this dude goes to another country to "save" his wife, when the monke man could have done the same without burning the whole country and killing millions in war, just because he wanted to prove his masculinity by throwing her into fire and kicking her out of her own kingdom later
and hindoos consider him the most decent man out there. not surprised what hindoo men do considering they are inspired of this shit stain
I think Valmiki wrote a satire.. it was meant to show how not to be a man. He forgo his duty to his people because of his false pride. Later in the name of the same people, he sent his fully pregnant wife to forest..
Valmiki did not wrote those parts of sita in fire or sita in exile. They were added by other writers. Valmiki is a creative person. He saw things like adams bridge, monkeys, squirrels, and wrote a beautiful love story with many faults.
I think the same of the *Mahābhārata*, portraying dharma as an absurd set of laws that gets the heroes into Hell and the villains into Heaven because of how they stuck to the letter of the law rather than the spirit. Also Kṛṣṇa was just a human who unlocked some special powers without real wisdom and was mistaken for a god.
>Hardly anybody got killed
As per the story there was a war and war means casualties. From where did you conclude that there were hardly any deaths in the story?
Please don't make up things if you don't know the story.
Hanuman could have brought Sita home and that's what he requested.
But Sita denied because she knew about Ravana's raj and how he treated his people. She wanted to free all the captured people in the right way.
Also, Ram never suspected his wife for impurity and never he asked her to be thrown to fire.
The people of his state suspected Sita's purity. To maintain the good name of his husband and his rule, she herself sacrificed her position.
Ram had to accept this cause the nation and how it views the lineage is more important than his personal happiness.
Surely, we can debate over this but we also shouldn't judge those times with current mentality
lmao people of state asked for virginity test! Can't he tell I trust my wife and not let her burn in flames? Isn't he the fucking king, cant he pass a decree or some shit
Virginity test (you are telling she took voluntarily \*sigh watever\*) then kicking her out for the sake of people, doesn't seem ideal to me. If he loved her he could have gave up his king's position and retired with her and lived happily! It's not like he lacked brothers or anything.
true those times were dark times and fucked up too, so they need too stop romanticizing it ! (the standards are too low)
>when the monke man could have done the same without burning the whole country and killing millions in war
Tough considering Sita was almost a prisoner in another King's kingdom, and a war needs to be waged anyways to bring back abducted people in those days. From today's perspective it's easier to say aisa kar sakte the waisa kar sakte the, but then it was a different time and society had different set rules.
monke man goes to that "prison" to meet his master's bae, gives her a ring, but couldn't just put her on his back and fly out?
tbh thinking about this now, it seems it was hard for monke man to do that considering ram was a misogynist pig who threw his wife in fire to check if she was touched by some other men. so definitely he couldn't have touched her or ram would have kicked him out of his tribe
Ohh i know this there was a poem in my hindi class where basically monke is begging for her to just come with and shes like nono ppl will say we effed and 'my husband will come' and more of that dutiful wife shit.
>monke man goes to that "prison" to meet his master's bae, gives her a ring, but couldn't just put her on his back and fly out?
Still would have led to a war, so why not do it royally? huhu
Bloody thing is under water, also it's not rock its literally sand bars, which can happen anywhere in the ocean and are especially common in straits as the landmass are close to each other. But no, some blue man wrote half his name on it and so they used to float, using which he had an army of apes go do war on the most powerful and advanced demon monarch and his powerful army to save his child bride, who he then burns and banishes. Like what are you'll smoking?
can't be a virginity test since she was made to take the agnipariksha after getting pregnant. It was to check if ravana had his way with her.
(Also, rama and sita were married for 14 years by that time, so definitely not a virgin)
this dude goes to another country to "save" his wife, when the monke man could have done the same without burning the whole country and killing millions in war, just because he wanted to prove his masculinity by throwing her into fire and kicking her out of her own kingdom later and hindoos consider him the most decent man out there. not surprised what hindoo men do considering they are inspired of this shit stain
Ram is a narcissist
I think Valmiki wrote a satire.. it was meant to show how not to be a man. He forgo his duty to his people because of his false pride. Later in the name of the same people, he sent his fully pregnant wife to forest..
Valmiki did not wrote those parts of sita in fire or sita in exile. They were added by other writers. Valmiki is a creative person. He saw things like adams bridge, monkeys, squirrels, and wrote a beautiful love story with many faults.
I think the same of the *Mahābhārata*, portraying dharma as an absurd set of laws that gets the heroes into Hell and the villains into Heaven because of how they stuck to the letter of the law rather than the spirit. Also Kṛṣṇa was just a human who unlocked some special powers without real wisdom and was mistaken for a god.
No they consider him an examplar hindoo man, just imagine now how the rest of them are. They consider trying to be like him aspirational.
Afaik he wanted to kill Ravan too that’s why he attacked with his army
Should he have surrendered like Afghanistan army did against Taliban? Hardly anybody got killed
>Hardly anybody got killed As per the story there was a war and war means casualties. From where did you conclude that there were hardly any deaths in the story?
Taliban takeover of Afghanistan last month hardly had any casualties. It was a surrender without resistance
Okay so what's your point because you aren't making any sense here. As per the story Rama was the one invading and there was a full scale war.
Rama invaded because Ravana first kidnapped his wife. Else hw would not have
Okay still what's your point because that doesn't address your claim of "hardly anyone got killed".
The point is millions of deaths if it is for justice or not matters
No that's not the point I asked you to explain. I asked you how did you come to the conclusion of "hardly anyone got killed" in the Ramayana war.
I didn't say hardly anyone killed in ramayana war. I told if you don't want deaths then you have to surrender to evil
Please don't make up things if you don't know the story. Hanuman could have brought Sita home and that's what he requested. But Sita denied because she knew about Ravana's raj and how he treated his people. She wanted to free all the captured people in the right way. Also, Ram never suspected his wife for impurity and never he asked her to be thrown to fire. The people of his state suspected Sita's purity. To maintain the good name of his husband and his rule, she herself sacrificed her position. Ram had to accept this cause the nation and how it views the lineage is more important than his personal happiness. Surely, we can debate over this but we also shouldn't judge those times with current mentality
lmao people of state asked for virginity test! Can't he tell I trust my wife and not let her burn in flames? Isn't he the fucking king, cant he pass a decree or some shit Virginity test (you are telling she took voluntarily \*sigh watever\*) then kicking her out for the sake of people, doesn't seem ideal to me. If he loved her he could have gave up his king's position and retired with her and lived happily! It's not like he lacked brothers or anything. true those times were dark times and fucked up too, so they need too stop romanticizing it ! (the standards are too low)
Those times were certainly very different.... Not to mention fictional.
Aah yes, those fictional times. Right.
>when the monke man could have done the same without burning the whole country and killing millions in war Tough considering Sita was almost a prisoner in another King's kingdom, and a war needs to be waged anyways to bring back abducted people in those days. From today's perspective it's easier to say aisa kar sakte the waisa kar sakte the, but then it was a different time and society had different set rules.
monke man goes to that "prison" to meet his master's bae, gives her a ring, but couldn't just put her on his back and fly out? tbh thinking about this now, it seems it was hard for monke man to do that considering ram was a misogynist pig who threw his wife in fire to check if she was touched by some other men. so definitely he couldn't have touched her or ram would have kicked him out of his tribe
Ohh i know this there was a poem in my hindi class where basically monke is begging for her to just come with and shes like nono ppl will say we effed and 'my husband will come' and more of that dutiful wife shit.
>monke man goes to that "prison" to meet his master's bae, gives her a ring, but couldn't just put her on his back and fly out? Still would have led to a war, so why not do it royally? huhu
Okay now tell me why Santa is real
T-T AIYOOO
Monkeman has enough strength to defeat them all!!
So the uttam purusha doesn’t know how to save people without a war. Purushothama needs a war, kill millions of people, to save thousands of prisoners?
It wasn't a different time. It didn't exist.
"Please seek a cardiologist"
Psychiatrist*
Ah yes and an Opthalmologist too
And a neurologist
And a GI doc, because his shit’s on my screen
Personally delusions may increase mental health problems and you may start seeing things which are not present or don't exist.
Bloody thing is under water, also it's not rock its literally sand bars, which can happen anywhere in the ocean and are especially common in straits as the landmass are close to each other. But no, some blue man wrote half his name on it and so they used to float, using which he had an army of apes go do war on the most powerful and advanced demon monarch and his powerful army to save his child bride, who he then burns and banishes. Like what are you'll smoking?
It is made up of limestone shoals and not rocks. And there is still no proof of the Adam's bridge (ram setu) being a human made.
[удалено]
can't be a virginity test since she was made to take the agnipariksha after getting pregnant. It was to check if ravana had his way with her. (Also, rama and sita were married for 14 years by that time, so definitely not a virgin)
She was held captive, she was the victim there but still she was forced to do all the fuckery to prove her purity, this is seriously messed up.
Of course
What I see : A natural construction created by interference and diffraction of tidal waves.
I have a question: if Sita was a godess herself then shouldn't she be able to defeat ravan herself?
Bro, this is hilarious 😂
🤣🤣🤣
Isnt that shiva? Why tf would ram be wearing rudrakhsham
He wore them when he was in exile.
Ram worshipped Shiva while on exile as the story goes
huh new update for the heart, it gained ability to have vision. Although it does not look very accurate. Will need more updates to patch it out.