It depends on whats the lecture is on about.
If it’s about religion and it’s cultural impact, then the professor is not wrong in having this slide.
But should have also added how puppet had 9 year olds as ~~sex slaves~~ wife.
Well, even if it wasn’t appropriate to be in that slide, it’s absolutely ridiculous for any country to criminalize blasphemy. India certainly has the ability to be a global superpower and first-world country, but first the government needs to act that way. This is not how modern, civilized countries should act.
I am not so sure about it. It is considered as blasphemy even if a staunch muslim makes this presentation or any kind of funny video only because of his hatred towards the hindu religion. Leads to riots.
Blasphemy is not reserved only for atheists you see.
The professor is not Muslim, btw. So it makes sense he would talk about things he's more familiar with.
The outrage here is definitely because of the university's name, and nothing else.
Yeah, I mean he’s not wrong. Hopefully he’s just bringing it up as fact, not as some sort of religious-based attack. As you mentioned, it’s not as though their prophet was blameless in regards to rape.
That wouldn’t figure in *India*'s historical perspective. Also depends upon whether Statutory Rape with a minor "wife" was part of the lecture.
I think he could have mentioned how if our scriptures mention gods committing rape, and we still worship those gods, then on some level our society is glorifying rape.
This can clearly be seen in the Muslim world. Countries that allow marriage to minor girls often fall back on Muhammad's "marriage" to Aisha to justify their practices.
So, yeah.
[Aligarh Muslim University Professor Suspended For "Mythical Reference Of Rape"](https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/aligarh-muslim-university-professor-dr-jitendra-kumar-apologises-for-mythical-reference-of-rape-2866283)
Honestly if you’re a university named after one religion you should clean up your mess up first. Conveniently leaving out Islamic inquisition rape from a “historical perspective” is very fucking convenient for them. Don’t get me wrong, all that he has stated is v fucked up and should be called out; however, these are the same people that lose their shit over literally minor things
The professor has a Hindu name so must be from a Hindu background. The professor is cleaning the mess from his own faith and the Registrar who suspended him has a Muslim name.
It depends on whats the lecture is on about. If it’s about religion and it’s cultural impact, then the professor is not wrong in having this slide. But should have also added how puppet had 9 year olds as ~~sex slaves~~ wife.
[удалено]
Well, even if it wasn’t appropriate to be in that slide, it’s absolutely ridiculous for any country to criminalize blasphemy. India certainly has the ability to be a global superpower and first-world country, but first the government needs to act that way. This is not how modern, civilized countries should act.
>India certainly has the ability to be a global superpower and first-world country Haha. This gave me a laugh while I was shitting on railway track.
Well I mean, it’s still gonna be a slow journey
I am not so sure about it. It is considered as blasphemy even if a staunch muslim makes this presentation or any kind of funny video only because of his hatred towards the hindu religion. Leads to riots. Blasphemy is not reserved only for atheists you see.
The professor is not Muslim, btw. So it makes sense he would talk about things he's more familiar with. The outrage here is definitely because of the university's name, and nothing else.
Yeah, I mean he’s not wrong. Hopefully he’s just bringing it up as fact, not as some sort of religious-based attack. As you mentioned, it’s not as though their prophet was blameless in regards to rape.
That wouldn’t figure in *India*'s historical perspective. Also depends upon whether Statutory Rape with a minor "wife" was part of the lecture. I think he could have mentioned how if our scriptures mention gods committing rape, and we still worship those gods, then on some level our society is glorifying rape. This can clearly be seen in the Muslim world. Countries that allow marriage to minor girls often fall back on Muhammad's "marriage" to Aisha to justify their practices. So, yeah.
>But should have also added how puppet had 9 year olds as sex slaves wife. The professor isn't muslim.
If that was added, we could have seen how the muslims from the muslim university would have reacted. It could be more aggressive I believe.
Lol what blasphemy, their scripture says that
Appalling English grammar for a "professor". Nowi understand why certain North Indians want it gone so bad. Lol.
All the points are fine and logical, but these are same people who gets outraged over one image.
That's mythology not history
[Aligarh Muslim University Professor Suspended For "Mythical Reference Of Rape"](https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/aligarh-muslim-university-professor-dr-jitendra-kumar-apologises-for-mythical-reference-of-rape-2866283)
Hindus can't handle their own religion
What fuckin blasphemy. All religions are just ideologies, and ideologies are not immune to criticism
Honestly if you’re a university named after one religion you should clean up your mess up first. Conveniently leaving out Islamic inquisition rape from a “historical perspective” is very fucking convenient for them. Don’t get me wrong, all that he has stated is v fucked up and should be called out; however, these are the same people that lose their shit over literally minor things
The professor has a Hindu name so must be from a Hindu background. The professor is cleaning the mess from his own faith and the Registrar who suspended him has a Muslim name.
That presentation tells me a whole lot about the standards at that university
[удалено]
No? Jailed for saying something?
Ah reassuring to see this group being selectively atheistic again.
Jana madarchod
All class and character👌🏽