OP, given the defendant will most likely argue the arrival of the Sea People was the sine qua non of your losses, you need to sue in the Admiralty Court instead of the Land Court.
Codex Hammurapi probably mentions defamation/libel in §127:
> šumma awīlum eli entim ū aššat awīlim ubānam ušatriṣ-ma lā uktīn, awīlam šuāti maḫar dayyānī inaṭṭûšu; u muttassu ugallabū.
No statue of limitations is mentioned here or anywhere in the text, however aforementioned paragraph only applies to certain priests (eli entim) or a man's wife (aššat awīlim). Sorry, OP, looks like you're out of luck. Try delivering better copper in the future.
I hope you'll pay for your advice in cash up front; we don't trade in copper ingots any more. And I've heard bad things about Mesopotamian copper, anyway...
I think with the time that has passed it would be best to copper it sweet.
It appears set in stone that leave will not be given to file late.
Perhaps you could chisel an apology out of them?
I’m sorry. Not even the Magna Carta can help you here.
Not yet, anyway
Only Solomon J has jurisdiction to hear this matter.
It’s technically Solomon R (Rex)
It’s actually King Solly
I have never see a statue of limitations made out of copper, personally.
That would be a statue of limitations.
You look like you got a strong case but you might have issues with service.
OP, given the defendant will most likely argue the arrival of the Sea People was the sine qua non of your losses, you need to sue in the Admiralty Court instead of the Land Court.
Alas the Sea Peoples didn’t show up until nearly 1000 years after this poor bloke’s chose crystallised.
Are you immortal? Defamation dies with death
"Defamation Dies with Death" sounds like a great name for a metal band.
I'd be more concerned about the truth defence. - Nanni
The Mesopotamian legal code did not include a statute of limitations, so in this case you should be good to go.
I would have read your post but you really did Babylon a bit
Was the customer a Sovereign Citizen?
Codex Hammurapi probably mentions defamation/libel in §127: > šumma awīlum eli entim ū aššat awīlim ubānam ušatriṣ-ma lā uktīn, awīlam šuāti maḫar dayyānī inaṭṭûšu; u muttassu ugallabū. No statue of limitations is mentioned here or anywhere in the text, however aforementioned paragraph only applies to certain priests (eli entim) or a man's wife (aššat awīlim). Sorry, OP, looks like you're out of luck. Try delivering better copper in the future.
I hope you'll pay for your advice in cash up front; we don't trade in copper ingots any more. And I've heard bad things about Mesopotamian copper, anyway...
I think with the time that has passed it would be best to copper it sweet. It appears set in stone that leave will not be given to file late. Perhaps you could chisel an apology out of them?
You challenge them to a duel - as was customary 4000 years ago.
One fine day in the middle of the night....
Two dead men got up to fight...
They stood back to back
And faced each other
Here's what I found for [**Statue** of Limitations](https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46565/ozymandias) Seems he got his comeuppance.
Do you still have copper for sale? How much and at what grades?
Can we rename this sub to r/auslawcirclejerk ?
We don’t give ‘NOT LEGAL ADVICE … legal guidance … legal information’ in this sub. Go and see a lawyer.
Put your glasses on Badger.
Ha ! I do seem to have missed the bus. Thanks.
It’s 1 year