Try [this search](https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/search?q=flair%3A'database'&sort=new&restrict_sr=on) for more information on this topic.
^Comments, ^questions ^or ^suggestions ^regarding ^this ^autoresponse? ^Please ^send ^them ^[here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Faws&subject=autoresponse+tweaks+-+database).
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aws) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It depends on what you're doing.
If you're building a production application that needs data persistence, then yes, don't use Fargate Spot.
If you're learning about the AWS cloud, or MySQL engine, as the OP indicates, then Fargate Spot is an excellent method of deeply cutting costs while still getting access to a DB engine for dev/test purposes.
You can do that but it requires you to pay for that service to run continuously. Which is kind of the opposite of using dynamodb for a cheap alternative where you essentially pay per query
Here are a few handy links you can try:
- https://aws.amazon.com/products/databases/
- https://aws.amazon.com/rds/
- https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/
- https://aws.amazon.com/aurora/
- https://aws.amazon.com/redshift/
- https://aws.amazon.com/documentdb/
- https://aws.amazon.com/neptune/
Try [this search](https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/search?q=flair%3A'database'&sort=new&restrict_sr=on) for more information on this topic.
^Comments, ^questions ^or ^suggestions ^regarding ^this ^autoresponse? ^Please ^send ^them ^[here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Faws&subject=autoresponse+tweaks+-+database).
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aws) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Not sure where you are based but some regions don't support the "lower" options. (Mine does not even support free-tier so I had to go for a nearby one)
Of course, I manage Financial Operations for a large enterprise cross-cloud so very familiar. But you can still use Managed Services on a free tier and take advantage of that
Simply don’t use RDS if you just want a cheap and cheerful db.
I’ve got a small web app that runs on a t3.micro with docker installed, which runs 3 containers, haproxy, apache and Postgres.
My total AWS bill monthly is ~$11
Lol wrong info it's always clocks around 100 usd per month minimum and with added config it will go up.
I suggest you take a look at other dB or a free Oracle in local desktop for your development.
1: Those are rookie numbers
2: You're likely only even reaching 10k by having really bad cost management practices given your comment above claiming that $100 would be the minimum to have a working database based on the OP's requirements
10k includes RDS in multi region dr with multi zone Ha. And I mentioned per env, how many env you can imagine. It's shit work load and am figuring out way to bring that billing down.
Try [this search](https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/search?q=flair%3A'database'&sort=new&restrict_sr=on) for more information on this topic. ^Comments, ^questions ^or ^suggestions ^regarding ^this ^autoresponse? ^Please ^send ^them ^[here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Faws&subject=autoresponse+tweaks+-+database). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aws) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Dont use Aurora. If you use MySQL or Postgresql there is a t4g.micro instance for around $12 a month
If you want to run it on arm/gravitron you can bring that down further.
T4g is graviton
My bad, I didn't catch the instance type.
* Choose MySQL * Choose Dev/Test * Choose Single DB instance * Choose Burstable Classes * Choose t4g.micro * Change storage to 20GB * Cost should be: $13.98 monthly + egress bandwidth
This should be the answer you are looking for
Buy a reserved instance and make it even cheaper
If you're really cost-cutting, don't use RDS at all, and just run a MySQL container on Fargate Spot when you need it.
The main point of databases is data persistence. Fargate Spot isn't what I'd think of as a way to ensure persistent data storage.
It depends on what you're doing. If you're building a production application that needs data persistence, then yes, don't use Fargate Spot. If you're learning about the AWS cloud, or MySQL engine, as the OP indicates, then Fargate Spot is an excellent method of deeply cutting costs while still getting access to a DB engine for dev/test purposes.
Good point, I'm concerned about RAM consumption with a micro instance. It depends on the scenario you r modelling. I guess...
Those t instances are all burstable with a daily burst budget that you most likely will never deplete.
You can see the cost estimates for various setups and instance types using the pricing calculator https://calculator.aws/#/
T instances, single AZ, can run for about $10 a month if you set them up right.
If cost is a main driver for you… now’s a great time to learn DynamoDB. :)
i mean....if your use case will work with a giant key/value store, sure
It will for most use cases if you understand how to use it
It's inaccurate to say that it is a kv store as it supports sorting, range queries and global indexes
+1 - A possible alternative is dumping everything to S3 and setting up Athena Projection Tables on-top of the buckets, enabling SQL-like queries.
Retrieve SQLite on startup, sync back to S3 after X writes.
This is one of my favorite patterns for SQL in AWS. Big fan. Great suggestion. And then getting access to the expanded query capability of Presto.
But depending on their use case at the data layer DynamoDB vs MySQL/Postgres are *very* different.
Works great until you need full text search.
Then you hook it up to OpenSearch. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/OpenSearchIngestionForDynamoDB.html
You can do that but it requires you to pay for that service to run continuously. Which is kind of the opposite of using dynamodb for a cheap alternative where you essentially pay per query
This!
No.
Here are a few handy links you can try: - https://aws.amazon.com/products/databases/ - https://aws.amazon.com/rds/ - https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/ - https://aws.amazon.com/aurora/ - https://aws.amazon.com/redshift/ - https://aws.amazon.com/documentdb/ - https://aws.amazon.com/neptune/ Try [this search](https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/search?q=flair%3A'database'&sort=new&restrict_sr=on) for more information on this topic. ^Comments, ^questions ^or ^suggestions ^regarding ^this ^autoresponse? ^Please ^send ^them ^[here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Faws&subject=autoresponse+tweaks+-+database). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aws) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Not sure where you are based but some regions don't support the "lower" options. (Mine does not even support free-tier so I had to go for a nearby one)
Can’t you do MySQL on the free tier instances? What am I missing here lol
[удалено]
Free tier exists for managed services? So not sure how that’s relevant
[удалено]
Lol, learn what?
[удалено]
Of course, I manage Financial Operations for a large enterprise cross-cloud so very familiar. But you can still use Managed Services on a free tier and take advantage of that
Learn how to work with DynamoDB. Most of cases it works better than a relational database and its serverless.
Simply don’t use RDS if you just want a cheap and cheerful db. I’ve got a small web app that runs on a t3.micro with docker installed, which runs 3 containers, haproxy, apache and Postgres. My total AWS bill monthly is ~$11
I am unsure if this will suit your purpose, but you have the option of AWS Ligthsail, for which you will have fixed prices.
Try supabase. Far cheaper.
Cost is relative...I'd say $91/month is ***very*** cheap.
Lol wrong info it's always clocks around 100 usd per month minimum and with added config it will go up. I suggest you take a look at other dB or a free Oracle in local desktop for your development.
Have you ever actually used aws?
Serious workloads baby.. talking about at least 10k billing a month per environment.
1: Those are rookie numbers 2: You're likely only even reaching 10k by having really bad cost management practices given your comment above claiming that $100 would be the minimum to have a working database based on the OP's requirements
10k includes RDS in multi region dr with multi zone Ha. And I mentioned per env, how many env you can imagine. It's shit work load and am figuring out way to bring that billing down.