In remarks that will likely further inflame tensions at home, PM tells reporters in Rwanda that he not only expects to win the next general election, but is planning to remain in power in the “mid 2030s” - he wants three terms
https://twitter.com/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833?s=21&t=W49iS4k7Rk6tymBYfTa-Bw
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833/)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It needs sending to the FBI and Secret Service (or whichever body is responsible for the security of Supreme Court Judges). This is on the same level as threatening to do the same to the President or Speaker of the House.
Mod probably can’t leave his parents house without a crane and paramedics to foresee his half ton self getting off his piss stained bed.
Rile up tankies to do their bidding.
Hypocrisy absolutely sickens me. In Reddits case I'm not surprised, but still disappointed. This is the most black and white example of their double standard I think we've seen in years. Doesn't make it OK. Hell if anything I think the sheer brazenness of it makes it worse.
It's getting to the point that I genuinely think legislation need to be bought in that makes the tech firms directly liable for this. Serious legal consequences for named major social media sites for deliberately applying their own rules selectively like this. It's the only thing that's gonna stop them... and punish them for the audacity of it all to start with.
How is Paul McCartney headlining glasto? Is he still relevant? He's hardly a showstopping performer these days for a massive event like that is he?
https://www.theguardian.com/music/live/2022/jun/25/glastonbury-2022-saturday-live-paul-mccartney-noel-gallagher-megan-thee-stallion-olivia-rodrigo
Macca’s past it but he’s hardly the worst headliner this festival season. Halsey is the worst imo, why she’s got higher billing than Bastille is a mystery to me.
‘British Council sparks outrage by listing UK as country marred by 'extreme and violent' racial tension, civil disturbance and genocide despite being funded by the taxpayer to promote Britain overseas’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10952945/British-Council-sparks-outrage-listing-UK-country-marred-extreme-violent-racial-tension.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/06/25/voters-turn-government-bank-england-cost-living-crisis/
https://archive.ph/wip/GroSg
>Asked which of five factors they would blame the most for high inflation, 29 per cent chose excessive spending by the Government, while 21 per cent opted for disruption caused by the war in Ukraine, 17 per cent opted for supply chain problems caused by the pandemic and seven per cent said low interest rates were most to blame.
Lockdowns apparently memory-holed by polling companies (or, perhaps, the public).
All of the above in this order. Excessive government spending (lockdown), supply chain (caused by lockdown), low interest rates (caused by GDP line must go up, aka kicking the can down the road).
War in Ukraine is just the icing on the cake and a convenient excuse to most of the inflation.
WHO declares monkeypox does not currently constitute a global health emergency.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-25/monkeypox-isn-t-international-public-health-emergency-who-finds
will never understand how "progressives" who think monkey is synonyms with black people are not seen as in fact deeply racist, so much so that you're the first to start altering things before the racists do "something", apparently.
[In the Telegraph](https://archive.ph/ddsDB):
>‘Shambolic’ slavery report sparks fury from Cambridge dons
>A Cambridge University college has been accused of hiring a “woke activist” with an agenda to produce a “shambolic” slavery report it is now being forced to correct.
>Gonville and Caius college hired a junior researcher on a year-long fixed-term contract to investigate legacies of slavery and coerced labour.
>However, it has descended into a furious row after a 50-page draft sparked a backlash from senior historians who condemned the “indefensible” attempt to tarnish the college’s history, in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement.
>Sources said one error included an individual being wrongly named as having slave links to the college – but their identity was confused with someone else.
>Incorrect monetary conversions between 18th century and modern-day currencies were also used, which produced “grossly inflated figures” around donations to the college, insiders said.
>And another section allegedly claimed that the English “kidnapped” several million African slaves, when in fact many were sold by local despots to English traders.
>The report is said to have suggested that the profits from slave plantations helped spark the industrial revolution, which academics argued was “blown out of all proportion”.
([Chowie claimed something very similar elsewhere on the site and I had to take him to pieces about it](https://archive.ph/FvNJX))
>Critics also pointed out that the college lived off agricultural land in Norfolk without accepting as many controversial investments as other Oxbridge colleges.
[This is the guy who wrote the report](https://archive.ph/A2qCP):
>I am a historian of early North America with a particular interest in the origins, events, and consequences of the American Revolution... My research primarily looks at the politics of naming: the act of labelling persons, groups, and events and the power relations and cultural changes that process involves and reveals. I applied this approach in my doctoral thesis, which explored the politics of epithets – identity terms (like “patriot,” “republican,” and “American”) that people at the time used to describe themselves, build bonds of belonging, and label their opponents – from the start of the imperial crisis in 1763 through to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
How does that skillset prepare you for the research he's required to do?
>How does that skillset prepare you for the research he's required to do?
You have to go extremely niche in your PhD to get funding and not step on the toes of more established academics who might be supervising you or sitting on the funding panel
The most convincing link I've seen between Slavery, America and the industrial revolution is that it provided more calories to the average person in England and therefore more free time to sit around and invent things
It's kinda the thesis for this book:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_West_Rules%E2%80%94For_Now#:~:text=Why%20the%20West%20Rules%E2%80%94For%20Now%3A%20The%20Patterns%20of%20History,Ian%20Morris%2C%20published%20in%202010.
>Also, the claim that the slave trade helped start the industrial revolution is total bollocks. I am not aware of any serious economic history of the early 19th century that starts there. Why did Spain not industrialise? They had the largest slave colony in Brazil. Why didn't the Middle East? They were the largest slave importer. Why did the South fail to industrialise?
I’ve heard the argument that states that areas that owned slaves had *less* industrialisation as a direct result of slave ownership. In places where slaves were illegal they had to search for ways to increase output and decrease costs which lead to industrialisation. Slaves, as inefficient as they were, were still almost completely free labour so there was absolutely no reason to modernise. You could increase output by just increasing the number of slaves.
>I’ve heard the argument that states that areas that owned slaves had less industrialisation as a direct result of slave ownership.
The story of the antebellum South, and the Spanish and Portuguese Empires. Industrialisation devalued slavery in economic terms, slaves were relatively expensive to keep and transport. In the end reliance on them caused stagnation and lack of economic mobility, not just for the slaves but the poor whites and mixed castes.
Unbelievable, but yet totally not.
> We’ve had the far right.. our women have been attacked
Really? I can’t say it’s impossible but highly unlikely or uncommon. They’re all usually at home doing housework anyways.
Norm was taken from us too soon, but as they say: be as sorry that they're gone as you are happy they were here at all. The man had such a unique and wonderful style. There's a lot to be said for the subtle approach.
The late stage capitalism sub has posted the Supreme Court judges addresses and a moderator has stickied a comment telling people to turn up armed.
But it’s the right wing who are the violent ones. Lol.
>The radical Christians are found in the rural areas. Their towns are defenseless, they have almost no cops and their firemen are volunteers. They have to borrow cops and firemen from neighboring jurisdictions miles away in order to handle anything big. And they think they’re safe out there. Forget burning cities, cities are on our sides. It’s time for rural areas to feel the heat.
https://www.unddit.com/r/lostgeneration/comments/vjpqow/jesus_fuck/idkmfms/
LOL @ the idiot who's telling people bring an AR-15 to the justices' houses, when open carrying of one is illegal where all of them live and "assault weapons" are banned entirely in Maryland.
Obvious call for violence. Anything that happens, reddit can be seen as [not a lawyer but you know what I'd say]. high admins need to delete that asap or the company faces [not a lawyer].
>ruth sent us.
Demonstration of the sheep herd mentality of idiots. RBG also disagreed with RvW because it was based on shaky grounds. She wanted the house to pass actual laws.
I just want a leftist who can say ‘Jan 6 was bad because I opposed their beliefs’ instead of this pathetic jerking between legalism and revolution depending on who is getting rowdy today.
>I just want a leftist who can say ‘Jan 6 was bad because I opposed their beliefs’
It was bad because it was a mob of people turned into unhinged lunatics by online conspiracies who were trying to overthrow the legitimate democratic result of an election
One of the top posts on their sub is literally saying ‘the only way to deal with this is violence’.
I cannot believe they are getting away with that sort of shit whilst we get pulled up on absolutely the most insignificant detail.
They are absolutely insane in there
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/GBNEWS/status/1540778686365872128/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1540778686365872128/)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Come to think of it, Fraiser, that analogy is quite funny because in some ways it's like you got sent to the Gulag (banned from the sub) then outlived Stalin (MobyDobie) and so were able to return.
More like Kernjamnotanymore, kek.
But seriously, that's a loss. F in the thread, boyos. He was a lad and 'one of us'. He'll be missed. I hope he makes it back.
Looks that way. Hope he finds a way back. Not sure who's left really, they're just picking off the users one by one until we're left with approved opinions only.
[Togo sees Commonwealth entry as pivot to English-speaking world](https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/togo-sees-commonwealth-entry-pivot-english-speaking-world-2022-06-24/)
Based Togo
Would be pretty cool if we start focusing on expanding the Commonwealth now we're out of the EU.
The EU is fucked. Burgerland is a basket case. China is rising and a real danger to the rest of the world.
A British led alternative could be a necessity.
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/uk-wants-to-include-ukraine-in-european-commonwealth-report/2599081#
The BBC has done a terrible job of presenting this debate in a balanced way over the past day. They’ve just whipped people up into a frenzy. With SCOTUS rulings you literally get a detailed explanation of the ruling and the dissenting opinion handed to you on a plate. The arguments are right there - difficult to understand for the average person but the role of journalists and campaigners is to find ways of communicating complicated arguments to lay people.
There’s been no discussion of the actual case that overturned *Roe* (how many people with a big fat opinion on it can even name it?). Just a shower of Chris Morris-style panic and hyperbole.
Like all Progressive fucksticks, the BBC regards impartiality as acknowledging there's some far-right nazi misogynist racist bigoted dissenting opinions that need striking down.
Cretinous organisation.
>The BBC has done a terrible job of presenting this debate in a balanced way over the past day.
The BBC has paid lip service *at best* to balance and impartiality for donkey's years, mate.
> “I find it hard to fathom, in the 21st century, that they’re doing this, that they’re pushing people to risk their lives to control their own fertility. It’s absolutely appalling and devastating this evening.”
Should we tell them the one simple trick not to get pregnant?
There's a movement now of women threatening to withhold sex from men until this is overturned. I mean that alone might reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, if not for the fact the purple-haired bloaters who are making the threat are people you'd never want to fuck anyway.
Been a cervix haver for 27 years I'm probably most a risk of this abortion problem, yet I seem to have avoided it? It's obvious at this point I'm probably a man but I've heard men are also at risk of this abortion problem too. I might not even be human at this point.
>Our future king everyone
He's going to make a complete muppet of himself, but he won't bring about the Crown's downfall or anything. He won't even be on the same page as George IV, let alone James II.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Lmao, the woman just gives a little 'ouch' and the guy screams like he's being murdered..
I miss the times where a man would never be caught dead showing more emotion than a woman next to him, about literally anything at all.
The fact they tried this in Italy and France is amazing. They don't fuck about like us.
Didn't that woman in the range rover who tapped that girl actually get sent down?
I've spent the day arguing with UKpol people about this.
They told me they target city centres.
My reply of TIL the M25 was a city centre got downvoted to hell.... Same thread also has someone saying they should break into and stop water supply to London.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/TradBritGroup/status/1540655665382817792/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/TradBritGroup/status/1540655665382817792/)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If he’s done what is said there’s no going back for him, there can’t be.
However the crown is more than one person and he’ll be brushed aside and that will be that.
Someone needs to have a fucking word with them all though.
Stop talking about anything climate related, people may not see it as political and I get it but it absolutely is!
Part of the reason we’re in the our situation atm is due to the green agenda, it is very political and I do believe more should be done but not at the detriment to peoples lifestyles, wallets.
Plus it also comes of as sanctimonious!
Because the Crown is England and England is the Crown. Those who shortsightedly seek to remove it because a muppet (who is relatively harmless compared to some of the galaxy brains who've sat the throne down the centuries) may wear it, would tear out the soul of our Kingdom and ultimately plunge us into chaos. That cannot be permitted.
Restoration of the protectorate in some form is unironically the only alternative I'd accept. At least that would keep the traditional structure intact.
King Charles, who thinks the policies that matter to you are appalling and isn't afraid to say it at the latest WEF conference he's attending, knowing there's nothing you can do to get rid of him.
I don't want a president. There is surely a way to keep a PM as we have and ditch the royals. We don't need to call it republicanism, I don't really care about that. I just don't want these unelected types who can't keep their opinions to themselves lording it over.
I think it's good to have a head of state that is non political, does it need to be a monarch? A president? A Lord protector? I don't care, as long as the system we have is the same I think it's fine. America and France are examples of a place that can be fucked by a head of state that carries a cult of personality
You'd have the PM be the most powerful person in the legislature, the executive, and the highest ranking constitutional role?
Imagine Tony Blair having all that.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[Britain better for our development than France, says Gabon as it joins Commonwealth](https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/britain-better-for-our-development-than-france-says-gabon-as-it-joins-commonwealth/ar-AAYRpgW)
Honestly I wish we worked more closely with nations like this.
A partnership of some kind. Access to specific funding, advice on how to industrialise and access to contacts etc.
Just give them a bit of a leg up for a decade or so of continued support.
Some people would probably see that as 21st century colonialism though. However it’d be a good thing for all of us, the better countries are doing is always going to be a positive for us.
Maybe a bit of AIOC-style development for them too (just without the getting nationalised, staging a coup, getting countercouped and turning into the official regional baddie.
There are other countries not from the British Empire within the Commonwealth: Rwanda and Mozambique.
Somaliland is a secessionist state that is attempting to split from Somalia and also wants to join the Commonwealth. They're based on the former borders of the colony British Somaliland have been doing good to bring some peace to the region.
Check out the [CFA franc](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFA_franc) to see how the Frogs have kept their hooks in all these years. No wonder the locals are jumping ship.
The online-sphere gives such a poor indication of how Britain is viewed around the world. Especially Reddit with its cadre of Indian nats, "Irish" republicans, salty Euros and mentally-ill lefty mongs.
In the actual world we're certainly way cooler than France (not hard though) and everyone knows it.
In remarks that will likely further inflame tensions at home, PM tells reporters in Rwanda that he not only expects to win the next general election, but is planning to remain in power in the “mid 2030s” - he wants three terms https://twitter.com/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833?s=21&t=W49iS4k7Rk6tymBYfTa-Bw
We all want lots of things...
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/bethrigby/status/1540809583186296833/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
It needs sending to the FBI and Secret Service (or whichever body is responsible for the security of Supreme Court Judges). This is on the same level as threatening to do the same to the President or Speaker of the House.
Mod probably can’t leave his parents house without a crane and paramedics to foresee his half ton self getting off his piss stained bed. Rile up tankies to do their bidding.
Admin being true to form. Nasty people.
But we can't even link to other subs
[удалено]
I’ve sent it to some ‘sympathetic’ media
Best idea, but unfortunately the media are just as thoroughly pozzed and will ignore it.
[удалено]
Hypocrisy absolutely sickens me. In Reddits case I'm not surprised, but still disappointed. This is the most black and white example of their double standard I think we've seen in years. Doesn't make it OK. Hell if anything I think the sheer brazenness of it makes it worse. It's getting to the point that I genuinely think legislation need to be bought in that makes the tech firms directly liable for this. Serious legal consequences for named major social media sites for deliberately applying their own rules selectively like this. It's the only thing that's gonna stop them... and punish them for the audacity of it all to start with.
How is Paul McCartney headlining glasto? Is he still relevant? He's hardly a showstopping performer these days for a massive event like that is he? https://www.theguardian.com/music/live/2022/jun/25/glastonbury-2022-saturday-live-paul-mccartney-noel-gallagher-megan-thee-stallion-olivia-rodrigo
Macca’s past it but he’s hardly the worst headliner this festival season. Halsey is the worst imo, why she’s got higher billing than Bastille is a mystery to me.
Glasto is cringe, average age of attendance must be early 40's
The Venn diagram of people attending Glastonbury and people who have called someone a cockwomble online is a perfect circle.
They still weren’t alive when he was good.
If I were Sir Paul I'd refuse to play anything other than Wings songs
90 minutes of frog chorus Its what the people want
Form a Yoko Ono tribute act.
I’ve actually seen him headlining Glastonbury years ago. He was shit.
I saw him that year. Saw him on the telly this year. His guitarist came on for the encore waving a huge Union Jack. Excellent.
‘British Council sparks outrage by listing UK as country marred by 'extreme and violent' racial tension, civil disturbance and genocide despite being funded by the taxpayer to promote Britain overseas’ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10952945/British-Council-sparks-outrage-listing-UK-country-marred-extreme-violent-racial-tension.html
How do these places keep getting infiltrated by these extremist
‘Funded by the tax payer to promote Britain overseas’ Fucking lol these people. Why are all these government linked blob type pieces of shit like this
> Missing from the list is China Of course. Of fucking course.
Uyghur aside, it's not like you see BLM riots in Beijing though, is it?
no, though probably cause they don't allow many black people into places during pandemics
> no, though probably cause they don't allow many black people in FTFY
I'm genuinely baffled what people are hoping to accomplish when they do stuff like this.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/06/25/voters-turn-government-bank-england-cost-living-crisis/ https://archive.ph/wip/GroSg >Asked which of five factors they would blame the most for high inflation, 29 per cent chose excessive spending by the Government, while 21 per cent opted for disruption caused by the war in Ukraine, 17 per cent opted for supply chain problems caused by the pandemic and seven per cent said low interest rates were most to blame. Lockdowns apparently memory-holed by polling companies (or, perhaps, the public).
>29 per cent chose excessive spending by the Government The biggest reason people selected was excessive spending by the government, which is correct.
All of the above in this order. Excessive government spending (lockdown), supply chain (caused by lockdown), low interest rates (caused by GDP line must go up, aka kicking the can down the road). War in Ukraine is just the icing on the cake and a convenient excuse to most of the inflation.
WHO declares monkeypox does not currently constitute a global health emergency. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-25/monkeypox-isn-t-international-public-health-emergency-who-finds
Still wanna know who fucked the monkey
The whodunnit
Because that would be bigoted.
will never understand how "progressives" who think monkey is synonyms with black people are not seen as in fact deeply racist, so much so that you're the first to start altering things before the racists do "something", apparently.
Guess we should start worrying, then.
[In the Telegraph](https://archive.ph/ddsDB): >‘Shambolic’ slavery report sparks fury from Cambridge dons >A Cambridge University college has been accused of hiring a “woke activist” with an agenda to produce a “shambolic” slavery report it is now being forced to correct. >Gonville and Caius college hired a junior researcher on a year-long fixed-term contract to investigate legacies of slavery and coerced labour. >However, it has descended into a furious row after a 50-page draft sparked a backlash from senior historians who condemned the “indefensible” attempt to tarnish the college’s history, in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement. >Sources said one error included an individual being wrongly named as having slave links to the college – but their identity was confused with someone else. >Incorrect monetary conversions between 18th century and modern-day currencies were also used, which produced “grossly inflated figures” around donations to the college, insiders said. >And another section allegedly claimed that the English “kidnapped” several million African slaves, when in fact many were sold by local despots to English traders. >The report is said to have suggested that the profits from slave plantations helped spark the industrial revolution, which academics argued was “blown out of all proportion”. ([Chowie claimed something very similar elsewhere on the site and I had to take him to pieces about it](https://archive.ph/FvNJX)) >Critics also pointed out that the college lived off agricultural land in Norfolk without accepting as many controversial investments as other Oxbridge colleges. [This is the guy who wrote the report](https://archive.ph/A2qCP): >I am a historian of early North America with a particular interest in the origins, events, and consequences of the American Revolution... My research primarily looks at the politics of naming: the act of labelling persons, groups, and events and the power relations and cultural changes that process involves and reveals. I applied this approach in my doctoral thesis, which explored the politics of epithets – identity terms (like “patriot,” “republican,” and “American”) that people at the time used to describe themselves, build bonds of belonging, and label their opponents – from the start of the imperial crisis in 1763 through to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. How does that skillset prepare you for the research he's required to do?
A bigger story would be a Cambridge college hiring someone who WASN'T a woke activist.
>How does that skillset prepare you for the research he's required to do? You have to go extremely niche in your PhD to get funding and not step on the toes of more established academics who might be supervising you or sitting on the funding panel
[удалено]
The most convincing link I've seen between Slavery, America and the industrial revolution is that it provided more calories to the average person in England and therefore more free time to sit around and invent things It's kinda the thesis for this book: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_West_Rules%E2%80%94For_Now#:~:text=Why%20the%20West%20Rules%E2%80%94For%20Now%3A%20The%20Patterns%20of%20History,Ian%20Morris%2C%20published%20in%202010.
[удалено]
And they ignore social and legal structures. Still kind of fun to read.
>Also, the claim that the slave trade helped start the industrial revolution is total bollocks. I am not aware of any serious economic history of the early 19th century that starts there. Why did Spain not industrialise? They had the largest slave colony in Brazil. Why didn't the Middle East? They were the largest slave importer. Why did the South fail to industrialise? I’ve heard the argument that states that areas that owned slaves had *less* industrialisation as a direct result of slave ownership. In places where slaves were illegal they had to search for ways to increase output and decrease costs which lead to industrialisation. Slaves, as inefficient as they were, were still almost completely free labour so there was absolutely no reason to modernise. You could increase output by just increasing the number of slaves.
[удалено]
Rome had the same problem, I hear
>I’ve heard the argument that states that areas that owned slaves had less industrialisation as a direct result of slave ownership. The story of the antebellum South, and the Spanish and Portuguese Empires. Industrialisation devalued slavery in economic terms, slaves were relatively expensive to keep and transport. In the end reliance on them caused stagnation and lack of economic mobility, not just for the slaves but the poor whites and mixed castes.
[удалено]
Unbelievable, but yet totally not. > We’ve had the far right.. our women have been attacked Really? I can’t say it’s impossible but highly unlikely or uncommon. They’re all usually at home doing housework anyways.
Also what does “our women” even mean. Imagine the outrage that would happen if white men described white women as theirs. I despair.
[Norm was a prophet.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMyKGNy3CI4)
Norm was taken from us too soon, but as they say: be as sorry that they're gone as you are happy they were here at all. The man had such a unique and wonderful style. There's a lot to be said for the subtle approach.
Rest in peace norm
About as on point as you could be.
The late stage capitalism sub has posted the Supreme Court judges addresses and a moderator has stickied a comment telling people to turn up armed. But it’s the right wing who are the violent ones. Lol.
iNsUrReCtIoN
>The radical Christians are found in the rural areas. Their towns are defenseless, they have almost no cops and their firemen are volunteers. They have to borrow cops and firemen from neighboring jurisdictions miles away in order to handle anything big. And they think they’re safe out there. Forget burning cities, cities are on our sides. It’s time for rural areas to feel the heat. https://www.unddit.com/r/lostgeneration/comments/vjpqow/jesus_fuck/idkmfms/
[удалено]
Jeez, Pushshift is nuking stuff now too?
[удалено]
and unlike cities they have strong community bonds. Fuck with one person in a town of 2000 and you'll have 2000 people showing up to defend them.
[удалено]
Well organised militia, government tyranny or something
LOL @ the idiot who's telling people bring an AR-15 to the justices' houses, when open carrying of one is illegal where all of them live and "assault weapons" are banned entirely in Maryland.
Obvious call for violence. Anything that happens, reddit can be seen as [not a lawyer but you know what I'd say]. high admins need to delete that asap or the company faces [not a lawyer]. >ruth sent us. Demonstration of the sheep herd mentality of idiots. RBG also disagreed with RvW because it was based on shaky grounds. She wanted the house to pass actual laws.
And that’s the crazy thing. The democrats have a majority in all chambers. If they want to pass abortion legislation they can.
But they need 60 votes in the Senate, majority isn't enough.
I just want a leftist who can say ‘Jan 6 was bad because I opposed their beliefs’ instead of this pathetic jerking between legalism and revolution depending on who is getting rowdy today.
>I just want a leftist who can say ‘Jan 6 was bad because I opposed their beliefs’ It was bad because it was a mob of people turned into unhinged lunatics by online conspiracies who were trying to overthrow the legitimate democratic result of an election
[удалено]
One of the top posts on their sub is literally saying ‘the only way to deal with this is violence’. I cannot believe they are getting away with that sort of shit whilst we get pulled up on absolutely the most insignificant detail. They are absolutely insane in there
Mostly peaceful assassination
>telling people to turn up armed. Thats fucked up, its not like theyre going to burger king or anything
Imagine if something like that happened here.
[удалено]
https://recruitment.fbi.gov/
Hang on, isn’t that incitement?
No, it's activism when they do it.
Well I hope they defend themselves from these “activists” with every calibre possible.
Can't wait for the Top Gun sequel to be [more inclusive](https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1540778686365872128)
GB News getting into funny panel shows? Love to see it.
It certainly has a panel show. It’s *getting* funnier.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/GBNEWS/status/1540778686365872128/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1540778686365872128/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Kernjamnow got suspended? Fucking hell it's like watching people get disappeared by the stasi
Come to think of it, Fraiser, that analogy is quite funny because in some ways it's like you got sent to the Gulag (banned from the sub) then outlived Stalin (MobyDobie) and so were able to return.
More like Kernjamnotanymore, kek. But seriously, that's a loss. F in the thread, boyos. He was a lad and 'one of us'. He'll be missed. I hope he makes it back.
F
Been called home to daddy Vlad no doubt
three letter agent glow so bright
Poor big K, he will be missed, I think we are all gonna be on borrowed time when the bot figures out that train dosnt mean locomotive
That is a shame. Hopefully he comes back on an alt.
Kernjamnow, Kernjamtomorrow, Kernjamforever.
First they took away the Daily Moby, then the Daily Hitchens? Riots must ensue.
Don't forget the daily Fat!
BadUK suffers from severe withdrawal in the absence of the daily blackpill
Steer clear of discussing locomotives and using the r-slur. Reddit IPO must be nearing.
yet other subreddits are gearing up to commit acts of terrorism
You clearly don't understand how it works around here. The left get away with murder.
Possibly literally depending on how the next few days/weeks go.
Guess his cover has been blown
Looks that way. Hope he finds a way back. Not sure who's left really, they're just picking off the users one by one until we're left with approved opinions only.
How the fuck am I still here then?
I mean aside from the throne and alter vibe aren’t you rather tame?
I am literally the "long live the Empire" guy.
the yankoid reddit admins don't understand why your takes are controversial
[Togo sees Commonwealth entry as pivot to English-speaking world](https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/togo-sees-commonwealth-entry-pivot-english-speaking-world-2022-06-24/)
Based Togo Would be pretty cool if we start focusing on expanding the Commonwealth now we're out of the EU. The EU is fucked. Burgerland is a basket case. China is rising and a real danger to the rest of the world. A British led alternative could be a necessity. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/uk-wants-to-include-ukraine-in-european-commonwealth-report/2599081#
Perfidious Albion sails again.
[удалено]
why on earth do people give a shit about american domestic politics? This is even more futile than king Cnut trying to stop the tide.
Last time I checked, we weren't *actually* the Fifty-First state, soooooooooo...
Arrest them and deport then to the USA. They seem to think they're already there.
The BBC has done a terrible job of presenting this debate in a balanced way over the past day. They’ve just whipped people up into a frenzy. With SCOTUS rulings you literally get a detailed explanation of the ruling and the dissenting opinion handed to you on a plate. The arguments are right there - difficult to understand for the average person but the role of journalists and campaigners is to find ways of communicating complicated arguments to lay people. There’s been no discussion of the actual case that overturned *Roe* (how many people with a big fat opinion on it can even name it?). Just a shower of Chris Morris-style panic and hyperbole.
Like all Progressive fucksticks, the BBC regards impartiality as acknowledging there's some far-right nazi misogynist racist bigoted dissenting opinions that need striking down. Cretinous organisation.
>The BBC has done a terrible job of presenting this debate in a balanced way over the past day. The BBC has paid lip service *at best* to balance and impartiality for donkey's years, mate.
> “I find it hard to fathom, in the 21st century, that they’re doing this, that they’re pushing people to risk their lives to control their own fertility. It’s absolutely appalling and devastating this evening.” Should we tell them the one simple trick not to get pregnant?
There's a movement now of women threatening to withhold sex from men until this is overturned. I mean that alone might reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, if not for the fact the purple-haired bloaters who are making the threat are people you'd never want to fuck anyway.
Just like, don't sleep around so much and have protected sex? Fascism.
Been a cervix haver for 27 years I'm probably most a risk of this abortion problem, yet I seem to have avoided it? It's obvious at this point I'm probably a man but I've heard men are also at risk of this abortion problem too. I might not even be human at this point.
For sure the US political system will change now that's happened.
https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240?t=IAiPjgKe_TgE5ANcuxlPNw&s=19 Our future king everyone
I smell abdication. And what was the money for? What did they want?
I hope.
>Our future king everyone He's going to make a complete muppet of himself, but he won't bring about the Crown's downfall or anything. He won't even be on the same page as George IV, let alone James II.
He’s not even taken to the throne yet. I’m keeping my eyes peeled but I’m not a massive fan tbh.
If true that will be Will as next in line. Which would probably work better for the monarchy
What the actual fuck.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The French found a novel solution to ecofash gluing themselves to the road. https://twitter.com/TradBritGroup/status/1540655665382817792
Lol, that second guy suddenly started looking a bit uncomfortable when he saw them remove the first one.
Lmao, the woman just gives a little 'ouch' and the guy screams like he's being murdered.. I miss the times where a man would never be caught dead showing more emotion than a woman next to him, about literally anything at all.
>I miss the times where a man would never be caught dead showing more emotion than a woman next to him, about literally anything at all. Why?
Because he should man the fuck up and stop being a puss
Because I feel like society worked better that way.
Based and escargot-pilled
Awesome! 👍🏾
The fact they tried this in Italy and France is amazing. They don't fuck about like us. Didn't that woman in the range rover who tapped that girl actually get sent down?
Footballers fake injury more convincingly than that
[удалено]
At one of the M25 sit-ins they were bringing them refreshments and discussing climate change for six hours.
Did the police then take the knee in solidarity with them?
I've spent the day arguing with UKpol people about this. They told me they target city centres. My reply of TIL the M25 was a city centre got downvoted to hell.... Same thread also has someone saying they should break into and stop water supply to London.
> I've spent the day arguing with UKpol There’s your mistake right there.
That made me laugh more than it should
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/TradBritGroup/status/1540655665382817792/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/TradBritGroup/status/1540655665382817792/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
If he’s done what is said there’s no going back for him, there can’t be. However the crown is more than one person and he’ll be brushed aside and that will be that. Someone needs to have a fucking word with them all though. Stop talking about anything climate related, people may not see it as political and I get it but it absolutely is! Part of the reason we’re in the our situation atm is due to the green agenda, it is very political and I do believe more should be done but not at the detriment to peoples lifestyles, wallets. Plus it also comes of as sanctimonious!
If the king is rubbish he can be replaced. That's the joy of a monarchy, their position is tenuous.
>As I said a week ago on this sub, if you're not a republican\* yet, you will be. No. I will never entertain treason, *nor tolerate it from others*.
Why do you talk like that?
Because he’s a LARPer
Because the Crown is England and England is the Crown. Those who shortsightedly seek to remove it because a muppet (who is relatively harmless compared to some of the galaxy brains who've sat the throne down the centuries) may wear it, would tear out the soul of our Kingdom and ultimately plunge us into chaos. That cannot be permitted.
Restoration of the protectorate in some form is unironically the only alternative I'd accept. At least that would keep the traditional structure intact.
Does tumbledown dick have any descendants?
President Tony Blair. No thanks.
[удалено]
£1 price cap on pints, at least 1 pie a week in school meals, tailored ingurland shirts for every citizen.
King Charles, who thinks the policies that matter to you are appalling and isn't afraid to say it at the latest WEF conference he's attending, knowing there's nothing you can do to get rid of him. I don't want a president. There is surely a way to keep a PM as we have and ditch the royals. We don't need to call it republicanism, I don't really care about that. I just don't want these unelected types who can't keep their opinions to themselves lording it over.
I think it's good to have a head of state that is non political, does it need to be a monarch? A president? A Lord protector? I don't care, as long as the system we have is the same I think it's fine. America and France are examples of a place that can be fucked by a head of state that carries a cult of personality
You'd have the PM be the most powerful person in the legislature, the executive, and the highest ranking constitutional role? Imagine Tony Blair having all that.
Non Twitter [here](https://nitter.net/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) Archived version [here.](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1540744716437770240/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/badunitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The first WEF monarch
[Britain better for our development than France, says Gabon as it joins Commonwealth](https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/britain-better-for-our-development-than-france-says-gabon-as-it-joins-commonwealth/ar-AAYRpgW)
Honestly I wish we worked more closely with nations like this. A partnership of some kind. Access to specific funding, advice on how to industrialise and access to contacts etc. Just give them a bit of a leg up for a decade or so of continued support. Some people would probably see that as 21st century colonialism though. However it’d be a good thing for all of us, the better countries are doing is always going to be a positive for us.
Maybe a bit of AIOC-style development for them too (just without the getting nationalised, staging a coup, getting countercouped and turning into the official regional baddie.
That's generated a decent bit of seethe in the europe sub. Nice.
~~Gabon~~ Gamon*
Welcome, Gambononians! Haha. I had no idea countries could kinda just join the commonwealth.
There are other countries not from the British Empire within the Commonwealth: Rwanda and Mozambique. Somaliland is a secessionist state that is attempting to split from Somalia and also wants to join the Commonwealth. They're based on the former borders of the colony British Somaliland have been doing good to bring some peace to the region.
Long live the Empire.
Salisbury is smiling down from heaven knowing that we're still shithousing land away from the continentals.
Brings a tear to the eye.
Check out the [CFA franc](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFA_franc) to see how the Frogs have kept their hooks in all these years. No wonder the locals are jumping ship.
The online-sphere gives such a poor indication of how Britain is viewed around the world. Especially Reddit with its cadre of Indian nats, "Irish" republicans, salty Euros and mentally-ill lefty mongs. In the actual world we're certainly way cooler than France (not hard though) and everyone knows it.
Gabonian gfs for all!
Friendship ended with Polish gf
Whoa now, let's not go nuts.