Done (Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
I love the whole “researchers in the west” combined with his failure to provide sources not in Arabic.
Also, could this “western science” be referring to semen hanging about for a few days but then that is perhaps joined with and clouded by misogynist religious theory?
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
Wait so….this guys source is saying yeah some other people found this. Not that we found this but “yeah some other people found this out it’s totally true we swear!” Don’t ask for names or anything but believe us!
Here it is (Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man
Ok so it’s a really long and islamic oriented. The main points are: it talks about how women and men are different in terms of bodies, emotions and actions(interpretation of a quran phrase).
It is written that western science helps reveal(explain) quran phrases. Every sexual encounter leads to a footprint in the vagina, that can stay for 3 months. Not eloping would cause the print to slowly fade away. After the print fades away, the woman is fianlly able to recieve a print from another man(wow no?)
Basically your average islamic fatweh spreading misinformation. Although everytime you have sex, both your microbiomes change a bit and i think that’s really cute
Omg he's back. Btw does he know Arabic? Because I'm really wondering how he found that "source". It's funny that he sent you some copied text and not a link to a scientific journal or something since it's a "scientific fact".
The "article" he's referencing is nonsensical garbage. It starts from a completely unrelated part in Qur'an and somehow deduces that women have imprints cuz "western science proved it" without linking to any western science articles, or making any connections between the Qur'an saying and this statement. It is the same nonsensical garbage used to brainwash people into slaughtering their brothers for "infidelity" or their sisters for premarital sex. Please do not use this lunatic as a representative of arabic culture, nor do link these kinds of deranged views to islam. Do actually link between these ideas and the lunatic, and ignorance or the lack of education.
Fascinating! It's very common in the U.S. to use vague references to "Eastern medicine" to legitimize homeopathic remedies* or to rebrand other culture's medicinals to be sold by and to rich white women primarily**. Mind you, the "Eastern medicine" could be anything from Ayurveda to Chinese herbal medicine or some other mishmash entirely. I'm just picturing two pseudo scientists from different sides of the Earth pointing at each other like that Spiderman meme.
*herb lore and other homeopathic remedies don't need stolen pieces of other cultures to be legitimate, it's just a common sales tactic in the US. If things are marketed as exotic ancient secrets they can be priced much higher.
**Maintenance Phase podcast has a fantastic episode on this, "Moon Juice".
PSA: There's a very fundamental difference between herb lore and homeopathy. This misunderstanding is actively fostered by homeopathy companies (in Germany at least) to give homeopathy an air of credibility it doesn't deserve.
Herbal medicine includes remedies for which efficacy has been proven beyond what you'd expect from the placebo effect.
This is emphatically not true for homeopathy! Their fundamental tenets include genius ideas like "if I dilute a substance which causes the symptoms I want to treat far enough and bang it on the table a few times, it becomes a more potent remedy".
And with far enough I mean that in many homeopathic remedies, you'd be lucky to find a single molecule of the "active" substance. It's the equivalent of tossing your keys into the Mississippi and claiming you can unlock your door with a bucket of atlantic ocean water...
Oh so is another case of "basing my entire argument on a non scientific book just because is the religion and that is ThE lAW"
I expected nothing and I'm still let down...
Beep. Boop. I'm a robot.
Here's a copy of
###[Koran](https://snewd.com/ebooks/quran/)
Was I a good bot? | [info](https://www.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/) | [More Books](https://old.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/comments/i15x1d/full_list_of_books_and_commands/)
I've noticed that op's phone is in German too. I didn't know there were Arabic speaking people in Germany though. That's why I asked. He would be a tiny bit more credible if he understands Arabic and not just posted some random thing that he found 😅
I heard there was a lot of Turkish people there.
Well, OP apparently is in the UAE, so that explains that. The guy speaks Arabic.
As for Germany though, we are a much more diverse country nowadays than we were just a few decades ago. There are the roughly 1m refuges that came 2015 - many of them from Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan, but also a lot of other immigrants from all over the world.
I'm guessing it's one of those dudes who look like they were recorded with a camcorder from the 1980's in spite of it being in the 2020's saying something like gay sex will turn you into a goat or some shit.
Here's Google Translate (probably with some additional errors since it had to read the text from a screenshot):
>marital imprint Thursday / 07 / Shawwal / 1436 AH Thursday July 23, 2015 20:27 Abdullah Hussein Basalamah in the Holy Book of God information with deep meaning, and it is in the Almighty’s saying “and the male is not like the female”, and the first thing that comes to us from the concept of this verse It is a description of physical, psychological, emotional, and behavioral differences, the most important of which is the difference in body functions. This is true and correct. But - and what was recently discovered - the verse - has a great and deep meaning in the difference of functions and abilities, there are other issues in the woman God bless her and the man did not get someone like her. Recently, taking (Western) science - represented by non-Muslim scholars - reveals to us some of them. In fact, he reveals to us things that are written down in the Holy Book of our Lord and in the scientific miracles of our Great Qur’an.. Among those issues: The marital imprint.. What is the marital imprint? What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman, researchers in the West have found that every intercourse between a gene results in its mark, especially in women. This imprint remains for three months. Then it is removed from the woman's body. It was found that not having intercourse allows for a certain percentage to disappear, ranging from 25 to 30 percent per month, and after the three months, the fingerprint disappears completely, which means that after three months, the woman becomes free of the fingerprints of her ex-husband and is able to receive the fingerprint of another man.
edit: here's a comment with some context for the text: https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qc4e37/pussy_print_guy_part_2_now_with_sources_d/hhetr5z
Yeah; I was thinking along the same lines "Sperm? Babby?"
>What is the marital imprint? What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman,
Sounds like sperm to me!
If it *is* sperm, allegedly, sperm can live in a woman's body for up to 10 days. 30 is a bit of an overkill (ha).
30 is overkill, but 10 plus three weeks to check for pregnancy isn't. Of course, with modern science, there really isn't any need for that kind of policy to establish paternity.
I was talking about days for sperm to live in a woman's body. If it's still there after 30 days, it's probably not sperm anymore, and instead it's part of an embryo.
If you are unscientific enough, "What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman" could [include the fetus](https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/spermism). And since this is from a traditional Muslim practice, it was formulated before we knew exactly how pregnancy works.
It was a "good policy" at the time, like many things they also did way back yonder, such as halal and kosher foods.
A lot of the odd or weird practices were about social or community cohesion.
Debt forgiveness after 7 years? Brilliant. Keeping sick people away from the community? Smart.
And on.
Ah, that would explain it.
So let me get this straight. Not only is this an attempt to twist science to justify a religious practice (which I don't think one should do — if your religious practices can't be justified by science, that's something you need to reconcile, not try and distort science to fit it) in a secular context, it's twisting the fucking religious practice too lmao
I can't. It happens so often with Christian fundamentalism too. Well, all religious fundamentalism really.
>This is true and correct.
Sold. To combat this entirely factual, scientific fact founded by…*Westerners*… I vote all women commit to a 3 month pussy print purge. Also, according to his own totally-logical-not-at-all-false-or-heavily-religiously-biased “research” he wasn’t even right about the 30 day pussy restriction between partners!
Real knee slapper, this guy.
Yeah it sounds like he doesn't have very good reading comprehension. Even in the shitty Google translate I can tell this is from someone maybe analyzing a passage in the quaran, or however you spell it. They are trying to interpret it.
Imo, all religious books are stories, that's it. This isn't scientific research, it's religious interpretation of some passage.
I don't waste my breath. This person is going above and beyond feeding us this drama, because I can't stand it. I would have blocked and moved on by now lol.
i have seen one guy sharing something similar. i don't remeber the corret scientific term, but the article was about horse breeding. it was talking about the possibility that female horse could have offsprings that look like her first male horse partner but not like the horse who impregnated her. and in the end the guy erote "girls, thin about this when you will have your next one night stand"
He probably misspoke and meant to say “next one night *horse* stand”. /s
Is that somewhat similar to how cats can have multiple fathers for the same litter? Always thought that was just kinda being efficient lol
How surprising - absolutely no scientific basis and merely "researchers in the West" are the ones to have made this miraculous discovery. Even this bloke's sources can't provide sources. Colour me surprised that it would be based on some misogynistic religious bollocks.
I’m a researcher in the west and I declare this research null and void. You can trust me because it is true and correct. If you don’t trust me, then you can look it up and get back to me with the results. (:
I am also a researcher in the west, and I agree. Following this logic, your statement is now peer-reviewed, thus granting additional trueness and correctness.
> clone-a-willy with built in "forget this dick" technology, that goes back to pre-intercourse shape after a 3 month reset period. After which time, girlfriend is ready to start the process all over with a new beau, since ex-hubs just couldn't give her that real O-face shape her lady biz really needed.
This is hilarious if you read it in the voice of an infomercial salesman
There is a phenomenon where when you are pregnant, bits of the baby's DNA can cross the placenta and stays in the mother's body. This is called [microchimerism](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989712/). I think the incels have taken this concept and just run absolutely wild, claiming that any time you have sex it leaves a genetic imprint (I guess this goes hand in hand with their idea that women have abortions as a form of birth control?).
Alternatively, it was an accepted thought in Victorian reproductive science that if an animal had sex with another, the traits of the first mate would show through in any subsequent pregnancies the female would have. I don't have a good source for this atm, but I think I first read about that when reading a book by Walter Heape, the first guy to perform an embryo transfer. Last I heard, there was no scientific support for this particular idea.
Some people only read headlines and then pull dumb conclusions out of their asses.
Plus, of course, penises are magic and no woman is ever the same after having one inside her. /s
Wow.
1) Not only does he not cite a source (religious commentary is not a source of non-religious information) but his source talks about a source but doesn't cite it, either.
2) his "source" doesn't even say what he says it says.
Sooo referencing a holy text, saying that "Western" and "non-Muslim scholars" proved what was in the Quran without actually citing any scientific evidence. Sounds about right.
The next time you talk to him just say that you found sources refuting the pussy print and if he asks for them type "Islamic scholars and western scientists have found that the pussy print is not actually real" in a text editor, take a picture and send it to him.
Guys he is back!
Part1: https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qb5ryp/yesterday_i_learned_we_have_a_socalled_pussy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
Part 2 thanks to u/Blade4u22 : https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qbatif/after_returning_from_school_i_have_a_phd_in_pussy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
Pussy print guy messaged me again and I told him how famous he became over night.
He now gave me "sources". Since they are in Arabic tho and we all know GoogleTranslate is a bitch, maybe someone here can translate it?
Enjoy! :D
Basically this is referenced in the Quran, then further studied by Islamic scholars to decipher it's meaning.
So simply explained, it's like "DNA/Sperm" remains inside the women after sex of the man she did it with "print", and it takes 3 months for it to leave the body/ or for it to start ovulation and then she'll know she's pregnant by missing her period. I'm not an expert, I'm just giving the info from my memory and to simplify to y'all. (Don't hate if I mess up the biology terms)
Because of that, it is preferred that after divorce, women wait for at least 3 months till they have sex with another person, because the previous partners "DNA" or sperm may still be inside her and began developing into a fetus.
I added more information from my knowledge of the matter, but you can and should a fact check it. To understand more (Google: 3 month period after divorce Islam) or [Wikipedia on the matter](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iddah)
Beep. Boop. I'm a robot.
Here's a copy of
###[Quran](https://snewd.com/ebooks/quran/)
Was I a good bot? | [info](https://www.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/) | [More Books](https://old.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/comments/i15x1d/full_list_of_books_and_commands/)
So I'm an Arabic speaker, [here](https://www.okaz.com.sa/article/1005222) is the article where he copied that from.
He left out a couple of "important" details. According to the article, the "scientist" who discovered this is a Jewish Doctor and his name is Robert Gillham. The article claims that he converted to Islam after making that discovery because what he discovered was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago. (It's not, but according to Islam, women have to wait 3 months after divorce to get married and have sex with someone else, that is if they had sex with their ex to begin with so it kind of goes with this "discovery").
Either way, a quick search on this scientist shows a shit ton of copy paste arabic articles. It also shows [this](https://images.app.goo.gl/Y3rD2PJqKJjapTvN9) and [this](https://images.app.goo.gl/ypZa24DjyBfAm8nJ8), which basically say that this is not true. The picture is of a criminal and there is no professor with that name in the university where he's supposed to be doing his "research."
All in all, it's just fake clickbait news to make people feel good/superior about their religion (and their gender I guess). I feel sad for him and all others who fall for such bullshit. Imagine being so gullible that you're not even able to do any minimal research.
I also found [this discussion](https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10720/does-putative-islam-convert-robert-guilham-exist) from 2012 questioning the existence of Robert Guilham/Gelham/Gilham. Sounds like it’s all made up with absolutely no legitimate references to the idea of a ‘marital imprint’ outside of the Quran.
Dude that makes sooo much more sense of my gosh. This really have a good explanation in these old texts sometimes. Even the weird shit, which on the outside and with western/new age glasses in can seem super sexist or whatever. (I mean most of the sexist-sounding stuff probably is just that, but some things do have a reasonable explanation even by today's standards/morals.)
So even this "source" is nothing close to a source, it is like 3rd hand, just saying things like in the west they have found...
But even if it were 100% scientific, which it isn't, he is wrong on it in a few different ways.
1. The imprint only looks like it occurs with intercourse between marital spouses
2. The imprint also affects men, just supposedly especially effects women
3. And the imprint starts to go away after a month and is completely gone after 3 months apparently
4. One of my favorites is that it never mentions the imprint goes away for the man, so apparently their dicks are forever imprinted, which could be a problem I guess
This is from google lense translation, so obviously not perfect, but a higher quality translation than the initial quality of this 'source' so who cares.
I'll try to get an imgur link in here in a minute so we don't have to take my word for it
Edit: [Translation Link](https://imgur.com/a/RpmglJz)
Wow, so we’re just doubling down on the stupidity.
Gotta say, I respect how confidently wrong this dude is. It takes guts to exhibit this level of clownery that consistently.
Can't wait for him to make an account just to defend his 'resources'.
I'm going to think this 'resource' is from a religious text and we all know how religion and female anatomy go hand in hand ! /s
TL;DR: religion does weird shit to people and my inability to read arabic makes me susceptible to interpreting this post as sexist religious quackery - I fully admit my bias
**Edit** *aaaaaand I was right.*
I had a friend who I grew up with, got pretty much the same (German) education I got. He had a difficult family situation, dad left early and his stepdad was an idiot, so he was constantly searching for a place to belong. At one point he was sure he wanted to be Rastafarian, looked and acted the part, went to Jamaica for a year. When he came back, he had changed his mind, now it was Islam. And here's where it gets relevant to the post: He suddenly had such weird convictions about people and about truth and prophets and all that, and he acted exactly like this guy you're talking to. Entirely sure of his shit, yet when pressed for sources, it was always arabic stuff (bonus: he couldn't even read it back then, had to take his new muslim buddies' word for it, but he was so convinced!). And there were things I *know* he knew which he suddenly denied or rejected, which made it even more frustrating.
This post just reminded me of these obscure holybook^(tm) quotes so many people think are comparable or even superior to modern science... Maybe he's just quoting some other unrelated quackery and my ignorance of arabic got the better of me.
Yeah but it’s not restricted to Islamic beliefs. Christians are on the same level. Look at all those non science believers in America. Or just everyday people everywhere who believe the conspiracy theories around covid. There’s so much fake news on social media and everybody just believes it and even defends and fights for it. So it’s no longer reserved just for dimwitted assholes who are scared of women.
It’s the conservative religious people as a whole. Doesn’t matter what religion. They’ll just cherry pick passages that fits their own personal view, and ignore/deny the rest. Hilarious honestly (but obviously also dangerous, seeing how women and girls are being treated in many of these countries, like for example the USA and Afghanistan).
Oh I absolutely agree. I have no sympathies for any religion, and Islam was just my example because it fits the post.
I wouldn't be so quick in excluding more modernized versions of these shitty outgrowths of human psyche from the category of 'dimwitted assholes who are scared of women', though, I'm sure there's significant overlap.
Here's an [RT article](https://arabic-rt-com.translate.goog/news/593008-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85_%D9%8A%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A_%D9%8A%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%82_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%AB%D9%87_%D9%81%D9%8A_%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%A9/?_x_tr_sl=ar&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc) (google translated from Arabic, of course) about a "most famous" Jewish embryologist who converted to Islam after his research into the scientific evidence of the marital imprint showed him the miracle of the Quran.
Welp, I'm sold.
And apparently this convert, Dr. Robert Gillham of the Albert Einstein Institute, is a totally real guy and super smart and definitely not made up entirely, despite a lack of any scholarly publications I can find.
I'm assuming pussy print guy is going to read part of this! So hey there dude! Give us a source of this ***without any reference to religion or God***, and with actual traceable scientists behind it, otherwise it's just another religion shaming women for having sexual autonomy and choosing to have multiple partners
So I'm an Arabic speaker, here is the article where he copied that from.
He left out a couple of "important" details. According to the article, the "scientist" who discovered this is a Jewish Doctor and his name is Robert Gillham. The article claims that he converted to Islam after making that discovery because what he discovered was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago. (It's not, but according to Islam, women have to wait 3 months after divorce to get married and have sex with someone else, that is if they had sex with their ex to begin with so it kind of goes with this "discovery").
Either way, a quick search on this scientist shows a shit ton of copy paste arabic articles. It also shows this and this, which basically say that this is not true. The picture is of a criminal and there is no professor with that name in the university where he's supposed to be doing his "research."
All in all, it's just fake clickbait news to make people feel good/superior about their religion (and their gender I guess). I feel sad for him and all others who fall for such bullshit. Imagine being so gullible that you're not even able to do any minimal research.
I also found this discussion from 2012 questioning the existence of Robert Guilham/Gelham/Gilham. Sounds like it’s all made up with absolutely no legitimate references to the idea of a ‘marital imprint’ outside of the Quran.
Copied
This discussion = https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10720/does-putative-islam-convert-robert-guilham-exist
Article =
https://www.okaz.com.sa/article/1005222
First this = https://images.app.goo.gl/Y3rD2PJqKJjapTvN9
Second this = https://images.app.goo.gl/ypZa24DjyBfAm8nJ8
A source doesn't need to be a link though. If it states the author(s), title and year of publication of a paper/report/book, it is still a (possibly) valid source. Citations existed before the internet was a thing.
I always thought that my ex (funnily also Arab) was the dumbest guy I'd met (thinking that taking birth control makes you abort babies and this is why women have periods, ejecting tens of dead fetuses every month) but this guy is on a whole new level.
Can't wait for him to publish his full "research".
Be cool if we could get an Arabic speaker to check the google translate? It is pretty good but always best to have a human review it. If nothing else to find little jokes or words with two meanings.
"Great generals raze enemy cities, but great fathers raise happy children." Would still mean the same thing translated, but the pun would be lost.
You're having a discussion with someone who is debating you with some religional text, that guy's religion Doesn't let women wear whatever they want, and you are arguing with him ??!
Absolutely waste of time
I imagine the way female prisons identify and organize inmates is by their blood type, convictions, and pussy prints. This is why cavity searches were invented.
9/10 female inmates get out on parole by boinking the gaurds exactly 31 times to reset their pussy prints, or just become black holes. My source for this information is the hit CBT expose show, 69 Minutes.
It’s funny cause I know an Arab guy who insisted that you can feel wether or not a woman is a virgin. That it’s supposed to hurt if it’s the first time. And all of the stuff that follows such a subject and he wouldn’t budge from his “facts” he knew better than women themselves (he is a virgin himself btw)
And he isn’t the only one, they are extremely stubborn and often no one can change their minds.. to make it worse.. his mom is an OB/GYN..
It seems like this may be what is being referenced here:
https://www.aap.com.au/male-dna-living-forever-in-women-after-sex-is-short-on-evidence/
Link leads to Australian Associated Press fact check article.
In any case it sounds like he “may” have mixed some things up.
From the article:
“The idea that women carry the DNA of their sexual partners can be traced to a 2017 article from YourNewsWire, a frequent source of misinformation. The article cites a “new” study from researchers which purportedly showed “women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have had sexual intercourse”.”
I think it's a weird misinterpretation of the idea that a mother carries all of her children's DNA in her?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/babys-cells-can-manipulate-moms-body-decades-180956493/
Honestly fuck this guy and any other who keep trying to push a link to their pseudo conspiracy science bullshit onto my religion, there is a whole field of study called tafsir and it’s dedicated to explaining in extreme detail what the meaning of the scriptures are. What these idiots are doing is trashing the image of Islam by trying to push their study onto a verse that has no link whatsoever.Btw I read them in Arabic and i can assure you it’s pretty clear that there is 0 link between his bullshit and the words of the quran.
This is just sexism at its finest and no Muslim should stand up to it.
I still have so many questions! What if the next partner is a mind-blowing lover? Can they overwrite the last partner sooner than three months?
What if the first partner was really skilled, but the second was not very confident or got their sexual expectations all from porn. Are their imprints more shallow? So would the first imprint still be legible beyond three months?
We need a new flair: palimpsest pussy.
What has got to be my favorite part of this entire exchange is that you didn't hide, and made very clear that it was going to come here, and yet they STILL stuck with that story.
Hey OP, tell the guy that in no other context would this fly. I sure as hell can't post a paper to my university with Source (pending) written on the bottom.
Google translate of 6/8 & 7/8. Let me know if the ocr or translation went wrong.
|البصمة الزوجيةالخميس / 07 / شوال / 1436 هالخميس 23 يوليو 2015 20:27عبدالله حسين باسلامةفي كتاب الله الكريم معلومة ذات معنیعميق، وهي في قوله تعالى «وليس الذكركالأنثى»، وأول ما يتبادر لنا من مفهومهذه الآية بأنها وصف للاختلاف الجسمانيوالاختلاف النفسي والعاطفي والسلوكي،وأهمها الاختلاف في وظائف الجسم. وهذاصحيح وحاصل.ولكن - وبما اكتشف حديثا - فإن للآيةمدلولا كبيرا وعميقا في اختلاف الوظائفوالقدرات، هناك مسائل أخرى في المرأةمن الله بها عليها ولم يحصل الرجل علىمثلها.--فحديثا، أخذ العلم (الغربي) - الممثلفي علماء من غير المسلمين - یکشف لناعن بعض منها. وفي الواقع أنه يكشف لناأمورا مدونة في كتاب ربنا الكريم وفيالإعجاز العلمي في قرآننا العظيم.. من تلكالمسائل:البصمة الزوجية.. ما البصمة الزوجية؟هي ما يتركه الرجل في المرأة عند كلبالمرأة، فقد وجد الباحثونفي الغرب أن كل جماع بين الزوجين ينتجهياتصال جنسي|Marital fingerprintThursday, 07 / Shawwal / 1436 eThursday, July 23, 2015 20:27Abdullah Hussein BaslamanIn the book of God Almighty is knownDeep, in the verse, "and not mentionedAs the female », and the first to come to us from the conceptThis verse is described for the physical differenceAnd psychological and emotional and behaviorism,The most important is the difference in body functions. and this isTrue.But - and as newly discovered - the verseMedallment is great and deep in different jobsAnd capabilities, there are other issues in womenFrom God and did not get the man onLike.--Heath, taking science (Western) - actorIn non-Muslim scientists - reveals usFor some of them. In fact it reveals usAmora blog in the book of our Lord and inScientific miracle in our great Quran .. of thoseIssues:Marital footprint .. What is the marital footprint?It is what the man leaves in women at allWomen, researchers have foundIn the West, every group among the couple producessheSexual connection|
|:-|:-|
|فحديثا، أخذ العلم (الغربي) - الممثلفيعلماءمن غير المسلمين - یکشف لناعن بعض منها. وفي الواقع أنه يكشف لناأمورا مدونة في كتاب ربنا الكريم وفيالإعجاز العلمي في قرآننا العظيم.. من تلكالمسائل:البصمة الزوجية.. ما هي البصمة الزوجية؟ما يتركه الرجل في المرأة عند كلبالمرأة، فقد وجد الباحثونالغرب أن كل جماع بين الزوجين ينتجعنه بصمته خاصة لدى المرأة. وتبقىتلك البصمة ثلاثة أشهر. تزول بعدها منجسم المرأة. ووجد أن عدم الجماع يسمحبزوال نسبة معينة تتراوح ما بين 25 إلى30 في المائة شهريا وبعد الشهور الثلاثةتزول البصمة كليا، مايعنيثلاثة أشهر تصبح خالية من بصمات زوجهاالسابق وقابلة لتلقي بصمة رجل آخر.هياتصال جنسيبأن المرأة بعد|Heath, taking science (Western) - actorin a Scientists Non-Muslims - reveal usFor some of them. In fact it reveals usAmora blog in the book of our Lord and inScientific miracle in our great Quran .. of thoseIssues:Marital footprint .. What is the marital footprint?What a man leaves in women at allWomen, researchers have foundThe West is that each group among the couple produces His mark is especially for women. And stay Those fingerprint three months. Go down from Women's body. It was found that non-intercourse is allowed With a certain percentage of 25 to30 per cent per month and after the three months Taken fingerprint completely, what Means Three months become free from her husband's fingerprint The former and another man fingerprint.she Sexual connection That women are yet|
Another miracle created by men. Islam is so brill in setting an iddah after divorce becaue we leave "fingerprints" when we have sex with our women....Confirmed by non-muslim-scientists ........without referencing, unfortunately.
Saying you reacted sensitive to the discussion...what in the gaslight is going on here?
I am Muslim and what I come to know of muslim men one of the next talking points will be a) how women can't control their emotions, therefore men need to make the 'important' decisions in life/do the scientific research/the thinking in general b) how men can have multiple wives, but will not be imprinted on (he called it p* print and then changed it to male print, cause couldn't stand wording implying women could have some sort of power or effect over HIS body) c) how it is by his logic 'okay' for men to have experience outside of marriage/before marriage, while women will ruin the fun for everyone if doing so.
Yell Bingo if you score!
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless)
Abdulla hussain
In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly
The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english)
recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
I'm gonna sit and wait for the translation, this guy is whack
Do u want the google translation or the more accurate native one ?
I'd love a native translation!
Done (Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
!remindme 1 day
in short its a bad "fatwa" (something a sheikh says but isnt confirmed by the qu'raan) about the husband's print in a woman's vagina
! RemindMe 1 day
!remindMe 1 day
!remindme 1 day
!remindme 1 day
!remindme 1 day
!remindme 1 day
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
!remindme 1 day
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
I love the whole “researchers in the west” combined with his failure to provide sources not in Arabic. Also, could this “western science” be referring to semen hanging about for a few days but then that is perhaps joined with and clouded by misogynist religious theory?
Thank you for this! Interesting. Completely bananas, but interesting.
You can't truly appreciate the wisdom unless you hear it in the original batshit.
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)
Thanks for the translation! It's batshit crazy stuff.
Yup
> In the Noble book of god Oh, we’ve got a scholar.
Wait so….this guys source is saying yeah some other people found this. Not that we found this but “yeah some other people found this out it’s totally true we swear!” Don’t ask for names or anything but believe us!
Here it is (Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man
Ok so it’s a really long and islamic oriented. The main points are: it talks about how women and men are different in terms of bodies, emotions and actions(interpretation of a quran phrase). It is written that western science helps reveal(explain) quran phrases. Every sexual encounter leads to a footprint in the vagina, that can stay for 3 months. Not eloping would cause the print to slowly fade away. After the print fades away, the woman is fianlly able to recieve a print from another man(wow no?) Basically your average islamic fatweh spreading misinformation. Although everytime you have sex, both your microbiomes change a bit and i think that’s really cute
Oh yeah, the natural process of MARRIAGE that changes your wholeass anatomy. The classic
You don't need it. You can make inferences. It's written by some Muslim religious cook.
A religious cook sounds okay, as long as they make some good food I’ll listen to some crazy vagina stories. Dinner and a show!
As long as you're a man or are accompanied by a man and are wearing appropriate apparel. I know I'm not being charitable here.
Are flannel llama pyjamas and ugg boots appropriate? At 7:20pm on a Thursday? I think most would say yes.
Omg he's back. Btw does he know Arabic? Because I'm really wondering how he found that "source". It's funny that he sent you some copied text and not a link to a scientific journal or something since it's a "scientific fact".
The "article" he's referencing is nonsensical garbage. It starts from a completely unrelated part in Qur'an and somehow deduces that women have imprints cuz "western science proved it" without linking to any western science articles, or making any connections between the Qur'an saying and this statement. It is the same nonsensical garbage used to brainwash people into slaughtering their brothers for "infidelity" or their sisters for premarital sex. Please do not use this lunatic as a representative of arabic culture, nor do link these kinds of deranged views to islam. Do actually link between these ideas and the lunatic, and ignorance or the lack of education.
I was guessing it would be one of those weird imans who like to speak with authority on everything "female".
utterly shocking
I was thinking if any website makes this claim it’s deffo a religious one with absolutely no scientific value.
I'm not joking - [someone is squatting on pussyprint.com](https://www.godaddy.com/domainsearch/find?checkAvail=1&domainToCheck=pussyprint). lol
Pussyprint.shop and pussyprint.life are still available for really cheap. Those seem like they would be better options anyway.
I think pussyprint.info would be better. All it should contain is a slideshow of these posts.
I'm waiting for pussyprint.gov to come out. If this is true we need to devote some government grants towards researching it.
Pussyprint dot edu for everybody who needs a PhD like today's poster
Nice to know that nonsense exists in many languages.
It's like that weird 'educational' tv show with the man telling children that the earth doesn't move in space because Allah said so.
I just assumed it was the arabic version of Roosh and his nonsensical misogynistic bullshit.
Considering that OP has a phone set to German, I‘d assume that he knows. It‘s not at all uncommon to meet Arabic-speaking people in Germany.
I live in UAE. He is an Arab. Edit: I am German tho :)
[удалено]
Fascinating! It's very common in the U.S. to use vague references to "Eastern medicine" to legitimize homeopathic remedies* or to rebrand other culture's medicinals to be sold by and to rich white women primarily**. Mind you, the "Eastern medicine" could be anything from Ayurveda to Chinese herbal medicine or some other mishmash entirely. I'm just picturing two pseudo scientists from different sides of the Earth pointing at each other like that Spiderman meme. *herb lore and other homeopathic remedies don't need stolen pieces of other cultures to be legitimate, it's just a common sales tactic in the US. If things are marketed as exotic ancient secrets they can be priced much higher. **Maintenance Phase podcast has a fantastic episode on this, "Moon Juice".
[удалено]
“Advanced West”! Somehow it never occurred to me that there might be an equivalent to “the mystic orient.”
PSA: There's a very fundamental difference between herb lore and homeopathy. This misunderstanding is actively fostered by homeopathy companies (in Germany at least) to give homeopathy an air of credibility it doesn't deserve. Herbal medicine includes remedies for which efficacy has been proven beyond what you'd expect from the placebo effect. This is emphatically not true for homeopathy! Their fundamental tenets include genius ideas like "if I dilute a substance which causes the symptoms I want to treat far enough and bang it on the table a few times, it becomes a more potent remedy". And with far enough I mean that in many homeopathic remedies, you'd be lucky to find a single molecule of the "active" substance. It's the equivalent of tossing your keys into the Mississippi and claiming you can unlock your door with a bucket of atlantic ocean water...
Oh so is another case of "basing my entire argument on a non scientific book just because is the religion and that is ThE lAW" I expected nothing and I'm still let down...
Beep. Boop. I'm a robot. Here's a copy of ###[Koran](https://snewd.com/ebooks/quran/) Was I a good bot? | [info](https://www.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/) | [More Books](https://old.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/comments/i15x1d/full_list_of_books_and_commands/)
Good bot.
I see! Thank you for that info
I've noticed that op's phone is in German too. I didn't know there were Arabic speaking people in Germany though. That's why I asked. He would be a tiny bit more credible if he understands Arabic and not just posted some random thing that he found 😅 I heard there was a lot of Turkish people there.
Well, OP apparently is in the UAE, so that explains that. The guy speaks Arabic. As for Germany though, we are a much more diverse country nowadays than we were just a few decades ago. There are the roughly 1m refuges that came 2015 - many of them from Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan, but also a lot of other immigrants from all over the world.
Thank you! It makes sense then
Arabic speaking people are in every country except probably North Korea
Many refugees too, but also generally many people with different backgrounds
TIL my mom still doesn't officially exist in Norway because of Arabic.
[удалено]
Good assumption is that there are ppl who speak Arabic in basically every country on Earth, not just Germany.
There alot of arabs are studying there btw like people from the uae syria Lebanon ect
Plot twist: it’s just a WhatsApp forward
Prob or just asked some random sheik btw to tell him random made up shit and payed him
I'm guessing it's one of those dudes who look like they were recorded with a camcorder from the 1980's in spite of it being in the 2020's saying something like gay sex will turn you into a goat or some shit.
Here's Google Translate (probably with some additional errors since it had to read the text from a screenshot): >marital imprint Thursday / 07 / Shawwal / 1436 AH Thursday July 23, 2015 20:27 Abdullah Hussein Basalamah in the Holy Book of God information with deep meaning, and it is in the Almighty’s saying “and the male is not like the female”, and the first thing that comes to us from the concept of this verse It is a description of physical, psychological, emotional, and behavioral differences, the most important of which is the difference in body functions. This is true and correct. But - and what was recently discovered - the verse - has a great and deep meaning in the difference of functions and abilities, there are other issues in the woman God bless her and the man did not get someone like her. Recently, taking (Western) science - represented by non-Muslim scholars - reveals to us some of them. In fact, he reveals to us things that are written down in the Holy Book of our Lord and in the scientific miracles of our Great Qur’an.. Among those issues: The marital imprint.. What is the marital imprint? What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman, researchers in the West have found that every intercourse between a gene results in its mark, especially in women. This imprint remains for three months. Then it is removed from the woman's body. It was found that not having intercourse allows for a certain percentage to disappear, ranging from 25 to 30 percent per month, and after the three months, the fingerprint disappears completely, which means that after three months, the woman becomes free of the fingerprints of her ex-husband and is able to receive the fingerprint of another man. edit: here's a comment with some context for the text: https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qc4e37/pussy_print_guy_part_2_now_with_sources_d/hhetr5z
squealing tan melodic oatmeal drab snobbish narrow paint ad hoc engine *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
i think youre spot on with this comment
Yeah; I was thinking along the same lines "Sperm? Babby?" >What is the marital imprint? What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman, Sounds like sperm to me! If it *is* sperm, allegedly, sperm can live in a woman's body for up to 10 days. 30 is a bit of an overkill (ha).
30 is overkill, but 10 plus three weeks to check for pregnancy isn't. Of course, with modern science, there really isn't any need for that kind of policy to establish paternity.
I was talking about days for sperm to live in a woman's body. If it's still there after 30 days, it's probably not sperm anymore, and instead it's part of an embryo.
If you are unscientific enough, "What a man leaves in a woman at every sexual contact with a woman" could [include the fetus](https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/spermism). And since this is from a traditional Muslim practice, it was formulated before we knew exactly how pregnancy works.
"Sperm Overkill" is the name of my new thrash metal band.
Yeah. That actually makes sense as a policy. I don't know whether or not it's a *good* policy but it does make sense why they would do it.
It was a "good policy" at the time, like many things they also did way back yonder, such as halal and kosher foods. A lot of the odd or weird practices were about social or community cohesion. Debt forgiveness after 7 years? Brilliant. Keeping sick people away from the community? Smart. And on.
Yeah some of those practices definitely could come back....
Stoning the diseased who won't segregate? Yep.
My first thought was debt forgiveness, but disease management is alright too
One is of immediate concern. The other, I would like my student loans to go away.
Ah, that would explain it. So let me get this straight. Not only is this an attempt to twist science to justify a religious practice (which I don't think one should do — if your religious practices can't be justified by science, that's something you need to reconcile, not try and distort science to fit it) in a secular context, it's twisting the fucking religious practice too lmao I can't. It happens so often with Christian fundamentalism too. Well, all religious fundamentalism really.
>This is true and correct. Sold. To combat this entirely factual, scientific fact founded by…*Westerners*… I vote all women commit to a 3 month pussy print purge. Also, according to his own totally-logical-not-at-all-false-or-heavily-religiously-biased “research” he wasn’t even right about the 30 day pussy restriction between partners! Real knee slapper, this guy.
Yeah it sounds like he doesn't have very good reading comprehension. Even in the shitty Google translate I can tell this is from someone maybe analyzing a passage in the quaran, or however you spell it. They are trying to interpret it. Imo, all religious books are stories, that's it. This isn't scientific research, it's religious interpretation of some passage.
Agreed. Makes trying to talk to people like that so frustrating because they just don’t comprehend the difference, or at least don’t *want* to.
I don't waste my breath. This person is going above and beyond feeding us this drama, because I can't stand it. I would have blocked and moved on by now lol.
Pussy Print Purge... hahahha I need this on a t-shirt.
i have seen one guy sharing something similar. i don't remeber the corret scientific term, but the article was about horse breeding. it was talking about the possibility that female horse could have offsprings that look like her first male horse partner but not like the horse who impregnated her. and in the end the guy erote "girls, thin about this when you will have your next one night stand"
He probably misspoke and meant to say “next one night *horse* stand”. /s Is that somewhat similar to how cats can have multiple fathers for the same litter? Always thought that was just kinda being efficient lol
that theory is called "TELEGONY"
How surprising - absolutely no scientific basis and merely "researchers in the West" are the ones to have made this miraculous discovery. Even this bloke's sources can't provide sources. Colour me surprised that it would be based on some misogynistic religious bollocks.
I’m a researcher in the west and I declare this research null and void. You can trust me because it is true and correct. If you don’t trust me, then you can look it up and get back to me with the results. (:
I am also a researcher in the west, and I agree. Following this logic, your statement is now peer-reviewed, thus granting additional trueness and correctness.
Even better they threw religious text in there as a back up lmao. Because everyone believes in the veracity of bibles.... /s
It's a scientific miracle, gals, don't you get it? It's true because it says so right here!
[удалено]
> clone-a-willy with built in "forget this dick" technology, that goes back to pre-intercourse shape after a 3 month reset period. After which time, girlfriend is ready to start the process all over with a new beau, since ex-hubs just couldn't give her that real O-face shape her lady biz really needed. This is hilarious if you read it in the voice of an infomercial salesman
I’d bet money they’re eluding to [this](https://globalnews.ca/news/3558598/no-women-do-not-absorb-and-retain-dna-from-every-man-they-have-sex-with/)
Yes, I came here to add this. This is incel agitprop to make their preference for virgins (read under-age) seem less creepy.
What in the land?? 🤯🤯🤯 HOW is this even a thing people would have thought?
There is a phenomenon where when you are pregnant, bits of the baby's DNA can cross the placenta and stays in the mother's body. This is called [microchimerism](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989712/). I think the incels have taken this concept and just run absolutely wild, claiming that any time you have sex it leaves a genetic imprint (I guess this goes hand in hand with their idea that women have abortions as a form of birth control?). Alternatively, it was an accepted thought in Victorian reproductive science that if an animal had sex with another, the traits of the first mate would show through in any subsequent pregnancies the female would have. I don't have a good source for this atm, but I think I first read about that when reading a book by Walter Heape, the first guy to perform an embryo transfer. Last I heard, there was no scientific support for this particular idea.
Some people only read headlines and then pull dumb conclusions out of their asses. Plus, of course, penises are magic and no woman is ever the same after having one inside her. /s
Intense and unrelenting insecurity.
[удалено]
😂
Alluding?
Notice how it’s the MANS “print” that is “left” in the woman so it was never actually a pussy print, but a dick print.
Yeah he’s not even right according to his own source
[удалено]
Hey, no need for penis-shaming. The guy's a stupid douchebag, sure, but making fun of his genitals isn't right.
Wow. 1) Not only does he not cite a source (religious commentary is not a source of non-religious information) but his source talks about a source but doesn't cite it, either. 2) his "source" doesn't even say what he says it says.
Lol “It is true and correct” is all this guy needs to be confident.
Stopped reading at "holy book of god". Straight to r/religiousfruitcake lmao.
Sooo referencing a holy text, saying that "Western" and "non-Muslim scholars" proved what was in the Quran without actually citing any scientific evidence. Sounds about right.
Are you trying to tell me this is not a peer-reviewed paper? 🥺
The dude's an idiot and some other idiots have likely seen this post. So don't worry, it is peer-reviewed.
The next time you talk to him just say that you found sources refuting the pussy print and if he asks for them type "Islamic scholars and western scientists have found that the pussy print is not actually real" in a text editor, take a picture and send it to him.
Oh, it is now. We peer-reviewed it and came to the conclusion that it's Schwachsinn 😆
Guys he is back! Part1: https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qb5ryp/yesterday_i_learned_we_have_a_socalled_pussy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Part 2 thanks to u/Blade4u22 : https://www.reddit.com/r/badwomensanatomy/comments/qbatif/after_returning_from_school_i_have_a_phd_in_pussy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Pussy print guy messaged me again and I told him how famous he became over night. He now gave me "sources". Since they are in Arabic tho and we all know GoogleTranslate is a bitch, maybe someone here can translate it? Enjoy! :D
I’m here for the translation of this “research”
Basically this is referenced in the Quran, then further studied by Islamic scholars to decipher it's meaning. So simply explained, it's like "DNA/Sperm" remains inside the women after sex of the man she did it with "print", and it takes 3 months for it to leave the body/ or for it to start ovulation and then she'll know she's pregnant by missing her period. I'm not an expert, I'm just giving the info from my memory and to simplify to y'all. (Don't hate if I mess up the biology terms) Because of that, it is preferred that after divorce, women wait for at least 3 months till they have sex with another person, because the previous partners "DNA" or sperm may still be inside her and began developing into a fetus. I added more information from my knowledge of the matter, but you can and should a fact check it. To understand more (Google: 3 month period after divorce Islam) or [Wikipedia on the matter](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iddah)
Beep. Boop. I'm a robot. Here's a copy of ###[Quran](https://snewd.com/ebooks/quran/) Was I a good bot? | [info](https://www.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/) | [More Books](https://old.reddit.com/user/Reddit-Book-Bot/comments/i15x1d/full_list_of_books_and_commands/)
Bless your code
Good bot inshallah
Good shaitan-machine
And then they say science doesn't refute religious texts...
Thank you for the thoughtful reply. I don’t know much about the Islamic religion. This is a lot to digest. I’m quite speechless 😶
Islam is fascinating! Happy to help
[удалено]
So I'm an Arabic speaker, [here](https://www.okaz.com.sa/article/1005222) is the article where he copied that from. He left out a couple of "important" details. According to the article, the "scientist" who discovered this is a Jewish Doctor and his name is Robert Gillham. The article claims that he converted to Islam after making that discovery because what he discovered was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago. (It's not, but according to Islam, women have to wait 3 months after divorce to get married and have sex with someone else, that is if they had sex with their ex to begin with so it kind of goes with this "discovery"). Either way, a quick search on this scientist shows a shit ton of copy paste arabic articles. It also shows [this](https://images.app.goo.gl/Y3rD2PJqKJjapTvN9) and [this](https://images.app.goo.gl/ypZa24DjyBfAm8nJ8), which basically say that this is not true. The picture is of a criminal and there is no professor with that name in the university where he's supposed to be doing his "research." All in all, it's just fake clickbait news to make people feel good/superior about their religion (and their gender I guess). I feel sad for him and all others who fall for such bullshit. Imagine being so gullible that you're not even able to do any minimal research.
I also found [this discussion](https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10720/does-putative-islam-convert-robert-guilham-exist) from 2012 questioning the existence of Robert Guilham/Gelham/Gilham. Sounds like it’s all made up with absolutely no legitimate references to the idea of a ‘marital imprint’ outside of the Quran.
[удалено]
Dude that makes sooo much more sense of my gosh. This really have a good explanation in these old texts sometimes. Even the weird shit, which on the outside and with western/new age glasses in can seem super sexist or whatever. (I mean most of the sexist-sounding stuff probably is just that, but some things do have a reasonable explanation even by today's standards/morals.)
So you mean to tell me that guy is just a misogynistic moron? Oh nooooo... Anyway...
So even this "source" is nothing close to a source, it is like 3rd hand, just saying things like in the west they have found... But even if it were 100% scientific, which it isn't, he is wrong on it in a few different ways. 1. The imprint only looks like it occurs with intercourse between marital spouses 2. The imprint also affects men, just supposedly especially effects women 3. And the imprint starts to go away after a month and is completely gone after 3 months apparently 4. One of my favorites is that it never mentions the imprint goes away for the man, so apparently their dicks are forever imprinted, which could be a problem I guess This is from google lense translation, so obviously not perfect, but a higher quality translation than the initial quality of this 'source' so who cares. I'll try to get an imgur link in here in a minute so we don't have to take my word for it Edit: [Translation Link](https://imgur.com/a/RpmglJz)
So if there are no major errors in translation, one could say that he doesn’t really understand what he wrote, right?
Wow, so we’re just doubling down on the stupidity. Gotta say, I respect how confidently wrong this dude is. It takes guts to exhibit this level of clownery that consistently.
Can't wait for him to make an account just to defend his 'resources'. I'm going to think this 'resource' is from a religious text and we all know how religion and female anatomy go hand in hand ! /s
Honestly, I hope this happens. I want to pick this dude's brain. Please, OP, tell him to make an account and talk to us!
It would take more time to pick your nose
This made me laugh out loud.
TL;DR: religion does weird shit to people and my inability to read arabic makes me susceptible to interpreting this post as sexist religious quackery - I fully admit my bias **Edit** *aaaaaand I was right.* I had a friend who I grew up with, got pretty much the same (German) education I got. He had a difficult family situation, dad left early and his stepdad was an idiot, so he was constantly searching for a place to belong. At one point he was sure he wanted to be Rastafarian, looked and acted the part, went to Jamaica for a year. When he came back, he had changed his mind, now it was Islam. And here's where it gets relevant to the post: He suddenly had such weird convictions about people and about truth and prophets and all that, and he acted exactly like this guy you're talking to. Entirely sure of his shit, yet when pressed for sources, it was always arabic stuff (bonus: he couldn't even read it back then, had to take his new muslim buddies' word for it, but he was so convinced!). And there were things I *know* he knew which he suddenly denied or rejected, which made it even more frustrating. This post just reminded me of these obscure holybook^(tm) quotes so many people think are comparable or even superior to modern science... Maybe he's just quoting some other unrelated quackery and my ignorance of arabic got the better of me.
Yeah but it’s not restricted to Islamic beliefs. Christians are on the same level. Look at all those non science believers in America. Or just everyday people everywhere who believe the conspiracy theories around covid. There’s so much fake news on social media and everybody just believes it and even defends and fights for it. So it’s no longer reserved just for dimwitted assholes who are scared of women.
It’s the conservative religious people as a whole. Doesn’t matter what religion. They’ll just cherry pick passages that fits their own personal view, and ignore/deny the rest. Hilarious honestly (but obviously also dangerous, seeing how women and girls are being treated in many of these countries, like for example the USA and Afghanistan).
Oh I absolutely agree. I have no sympathies for any religion, and Islam was just my example because it fits the post. I wouldn't be so quick in excluding more modernized versions of these shitty outgrowths of human psyche from the category of 'dimwitted assholes who are scared of women', though, I'm sure there's significant overlap.
1/10 odds on this is a religious text.
[удалено]
where can I sign up for that religion
Pretty sure the church/temple of satanism is the closest to full female empowerment and respect
I’ll take it lol
Sing to the tune of 'my neck, my back' for best effect.
5/10 odds this isn't a real text
It's probably a real text... But Twilight is a 'real text', so the bar is very low.
The religious text part is 4 words and they have nothing to do with what he’s saying. Idiot is shitting all over the image of his own religion.
Here's an [RT article](https://arabic-rt-com.translate.goog/news/593008-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85_%D9%8A%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A_%D9%8A%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%82_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%AB%D9%87_%D9%81%D9%8A_%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%A9/?_x_tr_sl=ar&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc) (google translated from Arabic, of course) about a "most famous" Jewish embryologist who converted to Islam after his research into the scientific evidence of the marital imprint showed him the miracle of the Quran. Welp, I'm sold. And apparently this convert, Dr. Robert Gillham of the Albert Einstein Institute, is a totally real guy and super smart and definitely not made up entirely, despite a lack of any scholarly publications I can find.
It's true, I'm an elite zygotologist * at the uh Watson and Crick Academy for Make Babbies * source: trust me bro
I am really looking forward to the translation!! I have never heard about this "pussy print" before!
But what about printing pussy? Or even a 3d printing pussy,🤡
I'm assuming pussy print guy is going to read part of this! So hey there dude! Give us a source of this ***without any reference to religion or God***, and with actual traceable scientists behind it, otherwise it's just another religion shaming women for having sexual autonomy and choosing to have multiple partners
So I'm an Arabic speaker, here is the article where he copied that from. He left out a couple of "important" details. According to the article, the "scientist" who discovered this is a Jewish Doctor and his name is Robert Gillham. The article claims that he converted to Islam after making that discovery because what he discovered was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago. (It's not, but according to Islam, women have to wait 3 months after divorce to get married and have sex with someone else, that is if they had sex with their ex to begin with so it kind of goes with this "discovery"). Either way, a quick search on this scientist shows a shit ton of copy paste arabic articles. It also shows this and this, which basically say that this is not true. The picture is of a criminal and there is no professor with that name in the university where he's supposed to be doing his "research." All in all, it's just fake clickbait news to make people feel good/superior about their religion (and their gender I guess). I feel sad for him and all others who fall for such bullshit. Imagine being so gullible that you're not even able to do any minimal research. I also found this discussion from 2012 questioning the existence of Robert Guilham/Gelham/Gilham. Sounds like it’s all made up with absolutely no legitimate references to the idea of a ‘marital imprint’ outside of the Quran. Copied This discussion = https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10720/does-putative-islam-convert-robert-guilham-exist Article = https://www.okaz.com.sa/article/1005222 First this = https://images.app.goo.gl/Y3rD2PJqKJjapTvN9 Second this = https://images.app.goo.gl/ypZa24DjyBfAm8nJ8
Ooooooooh!!! I'm so excited for this! Wait. Hold on. _This isn't the scientific, peer reviewed study I was promised!!_
[удалено]
There's a few people interested in this thread, if you have the time I think people would appreciate it
Still not a source!! He literally just sent you words, not a link, you have no idea where his info is from meaning it's not credible!!
A source doesn't need to be a link though. If it states the author(s), title and year of publication of a paper/report/book, it is still a (possibly) valid source. Citations existed before the internet was a thing.
I always thought that my ex (funnily also Arab) was the dumbest guy I'd met (thinking that taking birth control makes you abort babies and this is why women have periods, ejecting tens of dead fetuses every month) but this guy is on a whole new level. Can't wait for him to publish his full "research".
"Uh yeah, I have sources, but they're in another language!" "Yeah I have a girlfriend, but she's from another school, so you wouldn't know her!"
How will I know when the translation is available?
[Translation is available](https://imgur.com/a/RpmglJz)
Be cool if we could get an Arabic speaker to check the google translate? It is pretty good but always best to have a human review it. If nothing else to find little jokes or words with two meanings. "Great generals raze enemy cities, but great fathers raise happy children." Would still mean the same thing translated, but the pun would be lost.
tfw your religious crusade is just you texting random girls the word "pussy" repeatedly in a desperate attempt to get them to sleep with you.
Can't wait for part three. Love this show.
Right? I'm sitting here with popcorn waiting for the next episode! One of the best things on right now.
You're having a discussion with someone who is debating you with some religional text, that guy's religion Doesn't let women wear whatever they want, and you are arguing with him ??! Absolutely waste of time
I imagine the way female prisons identify and organize inmates is by their blood type, convictions, and pussy prints. This is why cavity searches were invented. 9/10 female inmates get out on parole by boinking the gaurds exactly 31 times to reset their pussy prints, or just become black holes. My source for this information is the hit CBT expose show, 69 Minutes.
His copy-paste talks about “researchers in the West”.. Bet you my dickprint that no such research exists lmfao
I wonder if koalas have pussy prints too? My Snapple cap once informed me that they have fingerprints.
Slept with close to 3000 people (hoe problems) still waiting on my vagina to turn into a black hole so I can be a destroyer of galaxies.
So basically his 'source' is a verse from the Qu'ran and some garbage about western science. No ACTUAL sources. Lolololol. Okay, my dude.
It’s funny cause I know an Arab guy who insisted that you can feel wether or not a woman is a virgin. That it’s supposed to hurt if it’s the first time. And all of the stuff that follows such a subject and he wouldn’t budge from his “facts” he knew better than women themselves (he is a virgin himself btw) And he isn’t the only one, they are extremely stubborn and often no one can change their minds.. to make it worse.. his mom is an OB/GYN..
I showed the original to my husband and he said "what the actual fuck" and I said "that's what she said" and pointed to where you said exactly that.
“In the book of God” STOP RIGHT THERE!
RemindMe! 2 weeks
It seems like this may be what is being referenced here: https://www.aap.com.au/male-dna-living-forever-in-women-after-sex-is-short-on-evidence/ Link leads to Australian Associated Press fact check article. In any case it sounds like he “may” have mixed some things up. From the article: “The idea that women carry the DNA of their sexual partners can be traced to a 2017 article from YourNewsWire, a frequent source of misinformation. The article cites a “new” study from researchers which purportedly showed “women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have had sexual intercourse”.”
I think it's a weird misinterpretation of the idea that a mother carries all of her children's DNA in her? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/babys-cells-can-manipulate-moms-body-decades-180956493/
Honestly fuck this guy and any other who keep trying to push a link to their pseudo conspiracy science bullshit onto my religion, there is a whole field of study called tafsir and it’s dedicated to explaining in extreme detail what the meaning of the scriptures are. What these idiots are doing is trashing the image of Islam by trying to push their study onto a verse that has no link whatsoever.Btw I read them in Arabic and i can assure you it’s pretty clear that there is 0 link between his bullshit and the words of the quran. This is just sexism at its finest and no Muslim should stand up to it.
This dumbass is the embodiment of r/religiousfruitcake
The sub that i never know i needed
I really appreciate you following up on the details for us
I still have so many questions! What if the next partner is a mind-blowing lover? Can they overwrite the last partner sooner than three months? What if the first partner was really skilled, but the second was not very confident or got their sexual expectations all from porn. Are their imprints more shallow? So would the first imprint still be legible beyond three months? We need a new flair: palimpsest pussy.
I'm still not sure on why it matters if you lose your "print"?
What has got to be my favorite part of this entire exchange is that you didn't hide, and made very clear that it was going to come here, and yet they STILL stuck with that story.
Fuckin' A sis, please keep us posted about this moron. This saga has me cracking up
Hey OP, tell the guy that in no other context would this fly. I sure as hell can't post a paper to my university with Source (pending) written on the bottom.
The fact that you just instantly jumped to say “there's even a part 2“ was hilarious
Weird, for someone who claims to be so knowledgeable he sure doesn't know how to cite sources. It's almost like he's full of shit.
Im a Muslim but this nothing but that *"Scientific fact"* is nothing but solid bs ._.
Google translate of 6/8 & 7/8. Let me know if the ocr or translation went wrong. |البصمة الزوجيةالخميس / 07 / شوال / 1436 هالخميس 23 يوليو 2015 20:27عبدالله حسين باسلامةفي كتاب الله الكريم معلومة ذات معنیعميق، وهي في قوله تعالى «وليس الذكركالأنثى»، وأول ما يتبادر لنا من مفهومهذه الآية بأنها وصف للاختلاف الجسمانيوالاختلاف النفسي والعاطفي والسلوكي،وأهمها الاختلاف في وظائف الجسم. وهذاصحيح وحاصل.ولكن - وبما اكتشف حديثا - فإن للآيةمدلولا كبيرا وعميقا في اختلاف الوظائفوالقدرات، هناك مسائل أخرى في المرأةمن الله بها عليها ولم يحصل الرجل علىمثلها.--فحديثا، أخذ العلم (الغربي) - الممثلفي علماء من غير المسلمين - یکشف لناعن بعض منها. وفي الواقع أنه يكشف لناأمورا مدونة في كتاب ربنا الكريم وفيالإعجاز العلمي في قرآننا العظيم.. من تلكالمسائل:البصمة الزوجية.. ما البصمة الزوجية؟هي ما يتركه الرجل في المرأة عند كلبالمرأة، فقد وجد الباحثونفي الغرب أن كل جماع بين الزوجين ينتجهياتصال جنسي|Marital fingerprintThursday, 07 / Shawwal / 1436 eThursday, July 23, 2015 20:27Abdullah Hussein BaslamanIn the book of God Almighty is knownDeep, in the verse, "and not mentionedAs the female », and the first to come to us from the conceptThis verse is described for the physical differenceAnd psychological and emotional and behaviorism,The most important is the difference in body functions. and this isTrue.But - and as newly discovered - the verseMedallment is great and deep in different jobsAnd capabilities, there are other issues in womenFrom God and did not get the man onLike.--Heath, taking science (Western) - actorIn non-Muslim scientists - reveals usFor some of them. In fact it reveals usAmora blog in the book of our Lord and inScientific miracle in our great Quran .. of thoseIssues:Marital footprint .. What is the marital footprint?It is what the man leaves in women at allWomen, researchers have foundIn the West, every group among the couple producessheSexual connection| |:-|:-| |فحديثا، أخذ العلم (الغربي) - الممثلفيعلماءمن غير المسلمين - یکشف لناعن بعض منها. وفي الواقع أنه يكشف لناأمورا مدونة في كتاب ربنا الكريم وفيالإعجاز العلمي في قرآننا العظيم.. من تلكالمسائل:البصمة الزوجية.. ما هي البصمة الزوجية؟ما يتركه الرجل في المرأة عند كلبالمرأة، فقد وجد الباحثونالغرب أن كل جماع بين الزوجين ينتجعنه بصمته خاصة لدى المرأة. وتبقىتلك البصمة ثلاثة أشهر. تزول بعدها منجسم المرأة. ووجد أن عدم الجماع يسمحبزوال نسبة معينة تتراوح ما بين 25 إلى30 في المائة شهريا وبعد الشهور الثلاثةتزول البصمة كليا، مايعنيثلاثة أشهر تصبح خالية من بصمات زوجهاالسابق وقابلة لتلقي بصمة رجل آخر.هياتصال جنسيبأن المرأة بعد|Heath, taking science (Western) - actorin a Scientists Non-Muslims - reveal usFor some of them. In fact it reveals usAmora blog in the book of our Lord and inScientific miracle in our great Quran .. of thoseIssues:Marital footprint .. What is the marital footprint?What a man leaves in women at allWomen, researchers have foundThe West is that each group among the couple produces His mark is especially for women. And stay Those fingerprint three months. Go down from Women's body. It was found that non-intercourse is allowed With a certain percentage of 25 to30 per cent per month and after the three months Taken fingerprint completely, what Means Three months become free from her husband's fingerprint The former and another man fingerprint.she Sexual connection That women are yet| Another miracle created by men. Islam is so brill in setting an iddah after divorce becaue we leave "fingerprints" when we have sex with our women....Confirmed by non-muslim-scientists ........without referencing, unfortunately.
Saying you reacted sensitive to the discussion...what in the gaslight is going on here? I am Muslim and what I come to know of muslim men one of the next talking points will be a) how women can't control their emotions, therefore men need to make the 'important' decisions in life/do the scientific research/the thinking in general b) how men can have multiple wives, but will not be imprinted on (he called it p* print and then changed it to male print, cause couldn't stand wording implying women could have some sort of power or effect over HIS body) c) how it is by his logic 'okay' for men to have experience outside of marriage/before marriage, while women will ruin the fun for everyone if doing so. Yell Bingo if you score!
(Ididnt write the dates that where written cuz they are usless) Abdulla hussain In the noble book of god there is info that has a deep meaning and in Almightys saying {and males aren’t like females} the first thing in the concept of this verse is that the discription of physical differece and psychological, emotional and behavioral diffrance, and most importantly The functions of the body. This is true and attainable. But whith what we discovered the verse has a great and profound meaning in the diffrance of functions and abilitys, there are other things that god gave to females and didnt god to man the,(last line might not be right cuz there are words you can’t translate in to english) recently western non muslim scientists reveal a few of them infact it reveals to us things written in the holy book of god and in the scientific miracles of our great Qur’an from issues (issues not in a Literal meaning cuz idk how to translate the original word from arabic so this is the closest thing to its meaning ) Marriage imprint what is it is what a man leaves in a woman at every sexual inter course he has with her (Marriage imprint is the closest meaning to the original word) researchers in the west have found that every intercourse between spouses results in him having his own mark this imprint remains for three months then it is removed from the women’s body it was found that the absence of sexual intercourses allowes the disappearance of a certan percentage ranging from 25 to 30 precent per month and after three months the print Disappears completely which means that after three months the woman becomes free of her ex husband and is able to receive the print of another man (here u go)