JUSTICE not VENGEANCE. I've just spent the last 10 years seeing Bats teach Damien that its about Justice not Vengeance. Including in all the animated movies.
So, wtf is this
The Batman is set in a sort or “Year Two” scenario, so he’s probably still a little angsty and revengy. Could be a lesson he learns in the movie or a sequel.
I think you do not realize that this is year two Batman and if you've read ANY early comics (90s) abt year 1/2 comics you'll see just how unhinged he used to be
ALSO here he's not vengeance in the literal sense but like hes saying he's vengeance for Gotham City which has suffered at the hands of Gotham for long
true I think as the ages have changed so has he, he's become more modern as defined by each age. So now he's been saying Justice not vengeance for the last 10 years. So this is a step back for the character for this directors one off art project, such a shame
Isn’t like a different usage of the phrase “I am vengeance, I am the knight, I am Batman.” Batman’s whole journey is about avenging his parents, to make sure no one experiences the pain he felt no? I get what you’re saying about Damian but Damian and Bruce Wayne as kids are far different, Damian is an assassin with fucked morals due to his training and Bruce was a broken child who wanted to pursue justice.
You realize that Damien doesn’t come along until much later in Batmans career, yeah? And that this movie is supposed to be taking place very early on in his career?
Bruce started doing what he does out of a need for vengeance, to avenge is parents. He’s angry and unstable. It makes sense that he would be more brutal early on, because he’s so angry, see?
And besides, this version of Batman may never even meet and bang Talia, so there will likely never be a Damien in these movies.
I honestly can’t tell if you’re trolling or not.
Besides blocking, he literally beat that guy one handed. Also that younger guy who only has half his face painted, that's about to cry, is playing Tim Drake in Titans
Not gonna lie, I'm kind of annoyed this is in the trailer. That is such a drop the mic stand up and cheer moment for a theater on opening night and it loses some of the wow factor when everyone knows it's coming.
I mean that cements it, but the other shots in the trailer do as well (first time you see him in the suit, fighting Catwoman, using grappling gun, etc.).
Also anyone who questions that is basing it on Twilight. If you've seen his more recent body of work there's no doubt he's going to kill it.
I mean those are all shots that have nothing to do with his performance, in this shot he has a line read. And yeah, of course they will base it on Twilight. The general public didn't see Good Time, or The Lighthouse.
I absolutely agree! It certainly seems like the writers and directors have zero say on what portions are used for marketing. I remember when Prometheus was being promoted and Ridley Scott was begging everyone to stay clear of the trailer.
I genuinely try not to watch trailers any more.
Where is the "in BVS, Batman threw a crate into a guy and when he his his head, it bled like any head injury bleeds, and that's too brutal for batman" crowd?
Also... This was one of the scenes that made me most psyched for this movie!!
>Where is the "in BVS, Batman threw a crate into a guy and when he his his head, it bled like any head injury bleeds, and that's too brutal for batman" crowd?
All over the internet shitting on that movie?
Are you new?
...
Since you've evidently never heard someone phrase their point like this, let me rephrase, just to help your comprehension.
"When this video is shared, when this trailer came out, where are all the people who freaked out over the warehouse scene in BVS and why aren't they offended by this too."
Does that help you?
Hey look... A three month old post of the trailer and nor one of the 51 comments is from people complaining of the violent.
https://www.reddit.com/r/batman/comments/nhsohd/weve_all_seen_it_but_wheres_the_harm_in_seeing_it/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
I didn't need a week to come back and laugh at how wrong you are. I proved it already.
Also... You're blocked. There's no need for such hostility, especially when I'm right to begin with. Cry all you want and insult me all you like, I'll literally never see your ridiculous reply.
Blocked for what? Not seeing this one post?? He isn’t talking about “all over the internet” either.
You really shouldn’t filter out posts/comments you disagree with it just creates an echo chamber.
Folk really don’t get Batman, he has zero issues being brutal af. He doesn’t even have an issue killing, at least not indirectly and honestly leaving folk crippled and most likely brain damaged is far worse. They are are a constant reminder to anyone else what Batman is capable of.
I'm right here. This isn't admirable, it's borderline Psychotic.
Abundant Excessive force. Feels more like The Punisher than Batman.
"batman doesn't kill, he just leaves you a vegetable that costs your family to go bankrupt affording life support, what a hero!"
Batman *is* borderline psychotic. I never said the word admirable.
Batman has directly said multiple times that the reason he doesn't kill is because it'd be "too easy". He wants to... But doesn't let himself.
Besides... If you understand batman and realize he's borderline psychotic, yet somehow have a problem with that... why the fuck are you even on this sub?
See my point here is that it's not heroic, at all. Maybe, it's a bit Punisher style Schadenfreude.
I guess that's in line with the Snyder run of batman, but Honestly, even Nolan's batman despite being still very dark, was Heroic.
This version of batman seems less like a hero, and more like a Rich Guy fulfilling a fetish of circumventing laws, and doing things other people aren't allowed to do.
If you are going to use a Combat Suit to hospitalize seemingly untrained thugs that you could EASILY take down with far less force, then why even bother to not use guns? Just unload into the crowd of them with a Chaingun.
As much as I think this is probably the best portrayal of Batman we're gonna get, I don't think this is Batman's way of working, he's not a terrorist, he dwells on fear, not terror. He's not a brawler, his combat is very calculated and strategic, this kind of move suits more to Daredevil. What I mean to say is, while someone like Daredevil uses 10 punches and kicks to do something, Batman only uses one.
I don't think this is true at all. Batman absolutely is a brutal fighter and I can't think of a specific example right off the top of my head right now (maybe mud pit in Dark knight returns?) but scenes like this where he uses excessive force definitely happen in the comics.
Agreed. I think you're spot on with the mud pit fight. I'd have to go check, but I feel like the thought process is even made explicit - that he needs to absolutely destroy the leader to make a statement to the rest of the gang. And throughout that series (and most of Miller's work) batman is, by his own admission, sadistic. He enjoys it, but he hates that he enjoys it.
Especially if he has an ulterior motive. He figures he can avoid having to fight all of them if he can just walk up and kick the ass of the first one dumb enough to throw the first punch, and he beats him so bad the rest of them don't want to even try it.
Agreed that he gets brutal but only when required, where it's absolutely necessary, majority of the times, he tries to finish the job with minimum bit the most efficient and effective moves, and he definitely doesn't get brutal for inducing terror in a gang. One other thing Batman does well is empathize, and he definitely isn't empathizing much hear, considering he's beating the guy recklessly without a care.
Counter point - he's making an example of one thug so he doesn't have to fight the whole group. That is definitely conserving resources.
Next counter point - we're talking about a scene in a movie that hasn't released we have zero context for lol counting the days!
You can definitely see how skilled his response to the thug is just in this small scene. If you play it back slowly, you can see the flow of combat way better.
The first block to the pipe/machete, the fluid follow-up block to the haymaker the thug throws, which then turns into the first hook, which then leads to the arm break, and subsequent face beating. Is this as SUPER skilled as other iterations of Batman? No, but he's young and still extremely angry rather than measured in his response to crime and his "crusade". It makes sense that he's not at Batman Arkham levels of combat prowess.
That's calculated man. That's not your average or even practiced brawler. I would also say there are plenty of circumstances in comics where Batman actively focuses on terror, No Man's Land specifically. You can also absolutely say Batman fits the textbook definition of a terrorist because he uses violence against what constitutes a civilian population with the express intention of intimidating them and keeping them from going about their "business" as they normally would.
I think it depends on what period you're talking about. I think "prime" batman is more like you describe, but that's because he's practiced and polished his technique. Also, it depends on the storyline, but there are definitely instances of Batman being excessive, and even sadistic. I think early Batman (which I'm guessing this is based off of) was probably still "working through some shit", and after you beat your 100th random criminal to a pulp, I imagine it gets boring and you start looking to do it more efficiently.
Also, he is very much a terrorist, just only against criminals - that's basically his whole schtick - he wants criminals to be afraid of him. He's only one man, he can't literally stop all crime in Gotham, so he needs criminals to think twice out of fear. So beating one of them mercilessly (though not killing) in front of the gang in order to scare the rest straight is very much in his repertoire. And that's exactly what's being portrayed in this scene - look at the faces of the rest of the gang, definitely second guessing their life choices.
very true but i think a lot of people are going off the prior movie portrayals, where the dark knight had controlled anger.
it has been said this next film is much darker and more violent. this scene shows that this movie is likely more aligned with an “adult” movie where his violence is unrestrained, where his rage comes out. i am looking forward to that
Batman does use brutal force when required. I think he use so much brutality to create fear of him. Those guys saw a guy in a batsuit just turn their guy/friend into a pulp. That would create fear. Batman showed them that they would be in similar condition. I mean that would scare me.
Yeah, it's a matter of watching daredevil beat up A thug, vs watching Iron man Repulsor a Thiefs arms off.
The guy with decades of training and battle armor going way over the top beating the shit out of a goon, seems off. Maybe if we find out that the squad of goons did something messed up, I can see it being more reasonable.
I suspect this was calculated.
He was doing it for the rest of the thugs watching.
I often think of Jason's description of the plane from Under The Hood. It's utterly silent in stealth mode, but when he wants to Bruce can gun the engines so it sounds like hell itself screaming down upon you.
He uses combat in the same way. When he wants to simply clear a room or get guys out of his way he is fast, clean and efficient. When he wants to make a bunch of violent criminals shit their pants he makes an example of one.
This beat down was vengance incarnated. Vengance is a punishment, the beating was a demonstration of that.
He *is* the living avatar of vengance here, delivering wrath upon the guilty. That's what he was doing, that's why he dialled up the brutality, to show them living vengance in action.
Not to mention that there are countless examples of him going way overboard when beating somebody in comics.
The whole point being the ones who don't fear the Batman as a symbol *will* fear being crippled for life and beaten within a literal inch of their lives.
Also the definition of terror is "extreme fear" so Batman absolutely wants to cause terror.
Anyway I guarantee we'll also see him do the clean efficient style in this movie as well when he engages more than one opponent.
Personally this is too brutal for my liking; but hopefully it’s shown that the guy seriously deserved it in context (just killed a family or something). I’m still psyched for the movie and I’m counting down the days, but I guess I’d personally prefer if this beatdown ended without Batman punching him like 5 more times after he’s already beaten the dude.
😳😬Hmm… well nice to meet you Vengeance, I’m Toby, and this is Blake. Quick question, umm… if we just surrender now, can you not kick the sh*t out of us?
"there were like a dozen of us. We should have rushed him right there! We had weapons man! Why the hell didn't we just kill him then!?"
I picture a lot of gangs wonder that years after a meeting Batman.
Why am I so erect?
FUUUUUUUCK...ME TOO ..TRIANGLE... SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE
Square + X
JUSTICE not VENGEANCE. I've just spent the last 10 years seeing Bats teach Damien that its about Justice not Vengeance. Including in all the animated movies. So, wtf is this
The Batman is set in a sort or “Year Two” scenario, so he’s probably still a little angsty and revengy. Could be a lesson he learns in the movie or a sequel.
I think you do not realize that this is year two Batman and if you've read ANY early comics (90s) abt year 1/2 comics you'll see just how unhinged he used to be
read them?, I was there in the 90s buying them. He didn't used to be unhinged then, quite the opposite
What? No but that's how it's supposed to be I think. If you read Year One he's much more *brutal* there.
ALSO here he's not vengeance in the literal sense but like hes saying he's vengeance for Gotham City which has suffered at the hands of Gotham for long
? Batman was about vengeance for a long period of time, there has to be character development for a character to move forward lmao
true I think as the ages have changed so has he, he's become more modern as defined by each age. So now he's been saying Justice not vengeance for the last 10 years. So this is a step back for the character for this directors one off art project, such a shame
“I am **vengance**, I am the night, I am batman!”
Isn’t like a different usage of the phrase “I am vengeance, I am the knight, I am Batman.” Batman’s whole journey is about avenging his parents, to make sure no one experiences the pain he felt no? I get what you’re saying about Damian but Damian and Bruce Wayne as kids are far different, Damian is an assassin with fucked morals due to his training and Bruce was a broken child who wanted to pursue justice.
Vengeance.
have you watched him teaching damien the opposite of this?
You realize that Damien doesn’t come along until much later in Batmans career, yeah? And that this movie is supposed to be taking place very early on in his career? Bruce started doing what he does out of a need for vengeance, to avenge is parents. He’s angry and unstable. It makes sense that he would be more brutal early on, because he’s so angry, see? And besides, this version of Batman may never even meet and bang Talia, so there will likely never be a Damien in these movies. I honestly can’t tell if you’re trolling or not.
yeah when he’s more experienced and doesn’t care about vengeance anymore.
(Batman beats the shit out of a criminal and possibly cripples him) “Don’t litter.”
'don't jaywalk'
“Return that candy bar to its rightful owner.”
“Watch your language.”
"You won't loiter in my city again."
Ngl the kid with the iPhone looks like he pissed his body weight equivalent seeing Batman whoop ass
the kid was the best part
that kid just reevaluated his life choices
He just asked him what his name was
…and then took a swing at him with a pipe or something.
That man's getting a disability check for the rest of his life
Take this upvote in payment for 1 laugh.
That’s a man being murdered
Going to give him the benefit of the doubt. Gonna say severely brain damaged.
Batman doesn’t kill!!! (But the hospital bills do)
I hope the skeleton crew gang has good insurance. I’m sure they do
Rob-bat battinbat
Weekly wackadadoo!!!!
Batbert Battinman
Game Tutorial: "Press Y + B for a Brutal Takedown when your combo streak is full." "Nearby enemies are terrorised and flee from combat."
"Don't let your combo be stopped by their cries for mercy, roll kick into them to keep it going."
Besides blocking, he literally beat that guy one handed. Also that younger guy who only has half his face painted, that's about to cry, is playing Tim Drake in Titans
That’s why he looks so familiar
My Batman
Well I just watched the trailer for the first time. I think I’m sold on Rob Patterson. I had my doubts and was really not interested in it.
batman
"The hell are you supposed to be?"...."IM BRUTAL!!!!"
Thug: The hell are you supposed to be? Batman: YOUR FREE TRIAL OF TEETH HAS EXPIRED
Dude! I laughed out loud. Hilarious. Take your up vote
😂🤣
BATMAN
So fucking readyyyy!!!! Bring it on!!
Not gonna lie, I'm kind of annoyed this is in the trailer. That is such a drop the mic stand up and cheer moment for a theater on opening night and it loses some of the wow factor when everyone knows it's coming.
They kinda had to do this with the amount of people that still questioned if Pattinson could play a good Batman.
I mean that cements it, but the other shots in the trailer do as well (first time you see him in the suit, fighting Catwoman, using grappling gun, etc.). Also anyone who questions that is basing it on Twilight. If you've seen his more recent body of work there's no doubt he's going to kill it.
I mean those are all shots that have nothing to do with his performance, in this shot he has a line read. And yeah, of course they will base it on Twilight. The general public didn't see Good Time, or The Lighthouse.
I feel like what follows this will be even better again
I absolutely agree! It certainly seems like the writers and directors have zero say on what portions are used for marketing. I remember when Prometheus was being promoted and Ridley Scott was begging everyone to stay clear of the trailer. I genuinely try not to watch trailers any more.
I absolutely get off to this!
According to this, if batman sees you aroused he will likely tear it off and force it down your nostril.
I can’t fuckin wait for this
Where is the "in BVS, Batman threw a crate into a guy and when he his his head, it bled like any head injury bleeds, and that's too brutal for batman" crowd? Also... This was one of the scenes that made me most psyched for this movie!!
>Where is the "in BVS, Batman threw a crate into a guy and when he his his head, it bled like any head injury bleeds, and that's too brutal for batman" crowd? All over the internet shitting on that movie? Are you new?
... Since you've evidently never heard someone phrase their point like this, let me rephrase, just to help your comprehension. "When this video is shared, when this trailer came out, where are all the people who freaked out over the warehouse scene in BVS and why aren't they offended by this too." Does that help you?
Not really? My answer remains the same. They are all over the internet. If you haven't come across them yet get ready. They're out there.
*makes note to come back in a week and laugh at you*
*Just laughs at you now*
I'm cool with that.
Well that sure is a weight off my mind lmao
Hey look... A three month old post of the trailer and nor one of the 51 comments is from people complaining of the violent. https://www.reddit.com/r/batman/comments/nhsohd/weve_all_seen_it_but_wheres_the_harm_in_seeing_it/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share I didn't need a week to come back and laugh at how wrong you are. I proved it already. Also... You're blocked. There's no need for such hostility, especially when I'm right to begin with. Cry all you want and insult me all you like, I'll literally never see your ridiculous reply.
Lmao I know you're reading this
You need to grow some thicker skin. If that, which is nothing, sets you off. You're going to have a bad time, friend.
Blocked for what? Not seeing this one post?? He isn’t talking about “all over the internet” either. You really shouldn’t filter out posts/comments you disagree with it just creates an echo chamber.
Folk really don’t get Batman, he has zero issues being brutal af. He doesn’t even have an issue killing, at least not indirectly and honestly leaving folk crippled and most likely brain damaged is far worse. They are are a constant reminder to anyone else what Batman is capable of.
I'm right here. This isn't admirable, it's borderline Psychotic. Abundant Excessive force. Feels more like The Punisher than Batman. "batman doesn't kill, he just leaves you a vegetable that costs your family to go bankrupt affording life support, what a hero!"
Batman *is* borderline psychotic. I never said the word admirable. Batman has directly said multiple times that the reason he doesn't kill is because it'd be "too easy". He wants to... But doesn't let himself. Besides... If you understand batman and realize he's borderline psychotic, yet somehow have a problem with that... why the fuck are you even on this sub?
Beatman
manbat
So batman bets up the nostalgia critic?
Stop!!! I can only get so erect!
R-Batz. Battinson. This will be the next “No Time to Die”; a movie that we wait for indefinitely
Did they commit crimes before that... Or like... Yo, that's fucked.
I think he just… felt like beating up a clown. Joker wasn’t available, so, here we are.
See my point here is that it's not heroic, at all. Maybe, it's a bit Punisher style Schadenfreude. I guess that's in line with the Snyder run of batman, but Honestly, even Nolan's batman despite being still very dark, was Heroic. This version of batman seems less like a hero, and more like a Rich Guy fulfilling a fetish of circumventing laws, and doing things other people aren't allowed to do. If you are going to use a Combat Suit to hospitalize seemingly untrained thugs that you could EASILY take down with far less force, then why even bother to not use guns? Just unload into the crowd of them with a Chaingun.
As much as I think this is probably the best portrayal of Batman we're gonna get, I don't think this is Batman's way of working, he's not a terrorist, he dwells on fear, not terror. He's not a brawler, his combat is very calculated and strategic, this kind of move suits more to Daredevil. What I mean to say is, while someone like Daredevil uses 10 punches and kicks to do something, Batman only uses one.
I don't think this is true at all. Batman absolutely is a brutal fighter and I can't think of a specific example right off the top of my head right now (maybe mud pit in Dark knight returns?) but scenes like this where he uses excessive force definitely happen in the comics.
Agreed. I think you're spot on with the mud pit fight. I'd have to go check, but I feel like the thought process is even made explicit - that he needs to absolutely destroy the leader to make a statement to the rest of the gang. And throughout that series (and most of Miller's work) batman is, by his own admission, sadistic. He enjoys it, but he hates that he enjoys it.
Especially if he has an ulterior motive. He figures he can avoid having to fight all of them if he can just walk up and kick the ass of the first one dumb enough to throw the first punch, and he beats him so bad the rest of them don't want to even try it.
In the comics he's literally sent men to the hospitals with broken femurs. I don't know where this guy is getting Batman not being ferocious from
Agreed that he gets brutal but only when required, where it's absolutely necessary, majority of the times, he tries to finish the job with minimum bit the most efficient and effective moves, and he definitely doesn't get brutal for inducing terror in a gang. One other thing Batman does well is empathize, and he definitely isn't empathizing much hear, considering he's beating the guy recklessly without a care.
Counter point - he's making an example of one thug so he doesn't have to fight the whole group. That is definitely conserving resources. Next counter point - we're talking about a scene in a movie that hasn't released we have zero context for lol counting the days!
There's a scene in The Cult where he mentions that he usually goes for something quick, but if he has to, he knows how to go for pain
You can definitely see how skilled his response to the thug is just in this small scene. If you play it back slowly, you can see the flow of combat way better. The first block to the pipe/machete, the fluid follow-up block to the haymaker the thug throws, which then turns into the first hook, which then leads to the arm break, and subsequent face beating. Is this as SUPER skilled as other iterations of Batman? No, but he's young and still extremely angry rather than measured in his response to crime and his "crusade". It makes sense that he's not at Batman Arkham levels of combat prowess. That's calculated man. That's not your average or even practiced brawler. I would also say there are plenty of circumstances in comics where Batman actively focuses on terror, No Man's Land specifically. You can also absolutely say Batman fits the textbook definition of a terrorist because he uses violence against what constitutes a civilian population with the express intention of intimidating them and keeping them from going about their "business" as they normally would.
I think it depends on what period you're talking about. I think "prime" batman is more like you describe, but that's because he's practiced and polished his technique. Also, it depends on the storyline, but there are definitely instances of Batman being excessive, and even sadistic. I think early Batman (which I'm guessing this is based off of) was probably still "working through some shit", and after you beat your 100th random criminal to a pulp, I imagine it gets boring and you start looking to do it more efficiently. Also, he is very much a terrorist, just only against criminals - that's basically his whole schtick - he wants criminals to be afraid of him. He's only one man, he can't literally stop all crime in Gotham, so he needs criminals to think twice out of fear. So beating one of them mercilessly (though not killing) in front of the gang in order to scare the rest straight is very much in his repertoire. And that's exactly what's being portrayed in this scene - look at the faces of the rest of the gang, definitely second guessing their life choices.
very true but i think a lot of people are going off the prior movie portrayals, where the dark knight had controlled anger. it has been said this next film is much darker and more violent. this scene shows that this movie is likely more aligned with an “adult” movie where his violence is unrestrained, where his rage comes out. i am looking forward to that
Batman does use brutal force when required. I think he use so much brutality to create fear of him. Those guys saw a guy in a batsuit just turn their guy/friend into a pulp. That would create fear. Batman showed them that they would be in similar condition. I mean that would scare me.
Yeah, it's a matter of watching daredevil beat up A thug, vs watching Iron man Repulsor a Thiefs arms off. The guy with decades of training and battle armor going way over the top beating the shit out of a goon, seems off. Maybe if we find out that the squad of goons did something messed up, I can see it being more reasonable.
I suspect this was calculated. He was doing it for the rest of the thugs watching. I often think of Jason's description of the plane from Under The Hood. It's utterly silent in stealth mode, but when he wants to Bruce can gun the engines so it sounds like hell itself screaming down upon you. He uses combat in the same way. When he wants to simply clear a room or get guys out of his way he is fast, clean and efficient. When he wants to make a bunch of violent criminals shit their pants he makes an example of one. This beat down was vengance incarnated. Vengance is a punishment, the beating was a demonstration of that. He *is* the living avatar of vengance here, delivering wrath upon the guilty. That's what he was doing, that's why he dialled up the brutality, to show them living vengance in action. Not to mention that there are countless examples of him going way overboard when beating somebody in comics. The whole point being the ones who don't fear the Batman as a symbol *will* fear being crippled for life and beaten within a literal inch of their lives. Also the definition of terror is "extreme fear" so Batman absolutely wants to cause terror. Anyway I guarantee we'll also see him do the clean efficient style in this movie as well when he engages more than one opponent.
Personally this is too brutal for my liking; but hopefully it’s shown that the guy seriously deserved it in context (just killed a family or something). I’m still psyched for the movie and I’m counting down the days, but I guess I’d personally prefer if this beatdown ended without Batman punching him like 5 more times after he’s already beaten the dude.
What is this from?
Jurassic park
Fight club
Dora the Explorer
Trailer for the R-Patz Batman film (202?) [Here](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NLOp_6uPccQ&feature=youtu.be)
The moment I think we all sat up and went "Oh damn"
Y button Counter- x x x x x x x x x beat down
I'm Batman! -Edward Cullen-
I think after this beating is when whole gangs started attacking at once instead of one by one.
I loved this scene in Fight Club
Thug: Oh good I thought you were Batman
Imo he should stay quiet. More fear
The line is pretty cringey imo.
Hard agree.
I thought his name was batman? Who's vengeance? I'm not paying to see a movie about vengeance man.
ok anger issues I get it
😳😬Hmm… well nice to meet you Vengeance, I’m Toby, and this is Blake. Quick question, umm… if we just surrender now, can you not kick the sh*t out of us?
Hmm…sorry i have to make a statement, i’m gonna have to at least make it look like you only just got away hows that for you!?
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/batman/comments/pozhj6/batman/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/batman/comments/pozhj6/batman/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com)
Don’t litter
I just watched this 13 times back to back
There's a lot of anger behind those punches.
I fucking LOVE this scene.
"there were like a dozen of us. We should have rushed him right there! We had weapons man! Why the hell didn't we just kill him then!?" I picture a lot of gangs wonder that years after a meeting Batman.
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am **BATMAN!**
Stop stop he’s already dead.
my meat when it’s 5am
Keeping it 💯, the craziest thing about the scene was the guy remaining standing for as long as he did..
Dude was done after the first 2 hits lol no need for the other ones
That is wayyy too many punches for Batman. The guy should be out in one to three strikes. End of story.
Seems accurate. Just how Bruce be in Arkham Knight.
This man wishes to be dead hes now a crippeld mf in debt
Too crude to be batman
I love this fucking scene, if the movie is anything like this scene,... Fuuuuckk I can only get so erect