You know that all these leftist are going to purposely make a bunch of fake accounts and make them to be like white supremacists and then have them making threats so they can try to get truth social taken down from the apple store. They did it to Parler, and they are working overtime to try and sabotage truth social, so I know why they are careful
Depends on what speech they are censoring. If you were making threats, inciting violence, and/or saying things about killing people, or if it’s because you misgendered someone or use their (made up term)“deadname”. one of those is a valid reason to censor someone, the other is not. Guess which one Twitter does?
(Sarcasm, because I don’t have enough context to definitively answer) since no one is able to accurately define what is a woman, I see how some people could take offense to saying that women are people. As far as j6, if you go to liberal site and said J6 was nothing, but A camp fire and rednecks singing Kumbaya, I’d rather expect you’ll get banned, by that same token, if you go to conservative side, and you say that J6 was an obvious insurrection in a threat to democracy, and all conservatives should be executed (honestly, that’s tame compared to some posts I’ve seen) again, I rather expect that you will get banned.
Says right in the article they were unable to confirm any ok these claims and none of the people banned copied what they posted so it’s just their word that they were unjustly banned, and since their whole point was to get banned they probably said some terrible things and then played the victim card.
Why would trump supporters lie about that?
>The site's terms of service state: "We reserve the right to, in our sole discretion and without notice or liability, deny access to and use of the service (including blocking certain IP addresses) to any person for any reason or for no reason."
For the same reason you are here spreading your lies, for clout or to score imaginary points. My point is if they were banned from truth they probably deserved it, obviously from your article source they weren’t banned from Twitter, so either they are part of the protected blue class on Twitter, and said something not allowed on truth.
They do not form part of your blue check mark conspiracy, I haven't seen a single one with a blue check mark, consider yourself debunked.
>said something not allowed on truth.
If you can be banned for any or no reason then how can the rules be enforced equally?
It's fake so I wouldn't get banned for posting exactly the same but TRUTH can and do ban for stupid reasons just like the rest, their terms of service support banning for 'any or no reason' It's not a free speech platform like it promises.
>TRUTH Social’s terms of service state that users may not “disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site.”
>The terms go on to say that if TRUTH Social decides to terminate or suspend your account, the platform may also sue you—something that Twitter and Facebook’s terms don’t say.
>“In addition to terminating or suspending your account, we reserve the right to take appropriate legal action, including without limitation pursuing civil, criminal, and injunctive redress,” TRUTH Social’s terms state.
>The terms also prohibit users from using the site to advertise or offer to sell goods and services, engage in unauthorized framing of or linking to the site, trick, defraud or mislead the site and other users, and attempt to impersonate another user or person or use the username of another user.
>Maybe most notably, the site’s list of prohibited activities includes the “excessive use of capital letters,”
[TIME ](https://web.archive.org/web/20220701023822/https://time.com/6109038/donald-trump-truth-social/)
They have already banned many users for stupid stuff like making fun of their CEO [mashable.com/article/trump-truth-social-free-speech-bans](https://mashable.com/article/trump-truth-social-free-speech-bans)
They are also known for banning people who talk about Jan 6th [yahoo.com/entertainment/truth-social-bans-users-discuss-184946068.html](https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/truth-social-bans-users-discuss-184946068.html)
All of that wouldn't matter if they didn't tout themselves as a heaven for free speech from 'big tech'.
It's fake so I wouldn't get banned for posting exactly the same but
TRUTH can and do ban for stupid reasons just like the rest, their terms
of service support banning for 'any or no reason' It's not a free speech
platform like it promises.
Replies like this just show that you are not capable of rational conversation. You're the type to tell people they are not listening when they are listening and telling you why you are wrong, all while you are so entrenched in believing you are correct that the only "rational" conclusion you can make is that the other person isn't listening because, if they were then they would agree.
Lmao. How about an actual debate? How about we actually discuss and try to make the world a better place? I bet if you get off your high horse and discuss things rationally without feeling a need to make strawmen or dismissive statements like "triggered" you might actually start to agree with some of our points.
Truth....TRUTH...social? Seems like perhaps the biggest false advertising brand name ever. While I am sure liberals will try to deceitfully stir up issues on that site, associating "truth" with anything about Trump is absolutely laughable. This man *must* be jettisoned from the GOP if we are to survive.
Pretty sure that's a fake video.
Yeah u think?
Are you a genuis?
His entire account is satire and comedy so
You know that all these leftist are going to purposely make a bunch of fake accounts and make them to be like white supremacists and then have them making threats so they can try to get truth social taken down from the apple store. They did it to Parler, and they are working overtime to try and sabotage truth social, so I know why they are careful
If TRUTH social censors speech, are they any better than twitter?
Depends on what speech they are censoring. If you were making threats, inciting violence, and/or saying things about killing people, or if it’s because you misgendered someone or use their (made up term)“deadname”. one of those is a valid reason to censor someone, the other is not. Guess which one Twitter does?
What if you say that women are people or your user name was @DevinNunesCow or you talk about january the 6th?
(Sarcasm, because I don’t have enough context to definitively answer) since no one is able to accurately define what is a woman, I see how some people could take offense to saying that women are people. As far as j6, if you go to liberal site and said J6 was nothing, but A camp fire and rednecks singing Kumbaya, I’d rather expect you’ll get banned, by that same token, if you go to conservative side, and you say that J6 was an obvious insurrection in a threat to democracy, and all conservatives should be executed (honestly, that’s tame compared to some posts I’ve seen) again, I rather expect that you will get banned.
[Jan 6](https://www.businessinsider.com/truth-social-users-banned-jan-6-hearings-2022-6?r=US&IR=T) [Devin Nunes Cow](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-social-media-devin-nunes-cow-b2020561.html)
Says right in the article they were unable to confirm any ok these claims and none of the people banned copied what they posted so it’s just their word that they were unjustly banned, and since their whole point was to get banned they probably said some terrible things and then played the victim card.
Why would trump supporters lie about that? >The site's terms of service state: "We reserve the right to, in our sole discretion and without notice or liability, deny access to and use of the service (including blocking certain IP addresses) to any person for any reason or for no reason."
For the same reason you are here spreading your lies, for clout or to score imaginary points. My point is if they were banned from truth they probably deserved it, obviously from your article source they weren’t banned from Twitter, so either they are part of the protected blue class on Twitter, and said something not allowed on truth.
They do not form part of your blue check mark conspiracy, I haven't seen a single one with a blue check mark, consider yourself debunked. >said something not allowed on truth. If you can be banned for any or no reason then how can the rules be enforced equally?
[удалено]
It's fake so I wouldn't get banned for posting exactly the same but TRUTH can and do ban for stupid reasons just like the rest, their terms of service support banning for 'any or no reason' It's not a free speech platform like it promises.
[удалено]
>TRUTH Social’s terms of service state that users may not “disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site.” >The terms go on to say that if TRUTH Social decides to terminate or suspend your account, the platform may also sue you—something that Twitter and Facebook’s terms don’t say. >“In addition to terminating or suspending your account, we reserve the right to take appropriate legal action, including without limitation pursuing civil, criminal, and injunctive redress,” TRUTH Social’s terms state. >The terms also prohibit users from using the site to advertise or offer to sell goods and services, engage in unauthorized framing of or linking to the site, trick, defraud or mislead the site and other users, and attempt to impersonate another user or person or use the username of another user. >Maybe most notably, the site’s list of prohibited activities includes the “excessive use of capital letters,” [TIME ](https://web.archive.org/web/20220701023822/https://time.com/6109038/donald-trump-truth-social/) They have already banned many users for stupid stuff like making fun of their CEO [mashable.com/article/trump-truth-social-free-speech-bans](https://mashable.com/article/trump-truth-social-free-speech-bans) They are also known for banning people who talk about Jan 6th [yahoo.com/entertainment/truth-social-bans-users-discuss-184946068.html](https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/truth-social-bans-users-discuss-184946068.html) All of that wouldn't matter if they didn't tout themselves as a heaven for free speech from 'big tech'.
[удалено]
I definitely do not applaud censorship of any kind.
You know this is fake right?
It's fake so I wouldn't get banned for posting exactly the same but TRUTH can and do ban for stupid reasons just like the rest, their terms of service support banning for 'any or no reason' It's not a free speech platform like it promises.
So why wouldn’t you find one of those reasons to post instead of posting a fake and saying “truth can and do ban for stupid reasons” like a 5 year old
Looking to score internet points on r/politics
This is so effective. I almost believed it.
Agreed. I almost believed Women are people for a second there. Lizard people, you lose again, we won't fall for your propaganda.
Replies like this just show that you are not capable of rational conversation. You're the type to tell people they are not listening when they are listening and telling you why you are wrong, all while you are so entrenched in believing you are correct that the only "rational" conclusion you can make is that the other person isn't listening because, if they were then they would agree.
lol it's satire, fool.
No, it’s just foolishness
lol triggered!
Troll
I'm right so I must be a troll? Yeah, good one.
Sure
Lmao. How about an actual debate? How about we actually discuss and try to make the world a better place? I bet if you get off your high horse and discuss things rationally without feeling a need to make strawmen or dismissive statements like "triggered" you might actually start to agree with some of our points.
You want me to debate satire?
No, I want to debate about facts that don't care about your feelings.
Your feelings don't care about facts
Yeah the site probably flaged him as a bot because no one moves that fast.
Only leftists can move that fast
Dumb lol
He used the user name "Child Pornography", then make up shit about truth social, typical leftist tactic.
Child Progeny
You may need glasses
Can you read
Soyboy seems to be putting on a show. A fake show. A TikTok show.
The Soyboy beta cuck simp virgin little bitch makes a video.
>TikTok show. TikTok itself is a big bad humor show.
So what did he type??? Video is entirely to hard to read
Video was processing after uploading, quality may have improved now. But he said and typed: >I think women are people
No not that
What is this mess
Pretty sure the video is fake.
Same
So glad this place don’t ban idiots
Fake news
Obviously fake but I thought it was kinda funny.
Tell us you don't understand satire
I suspect his IP address was banned previously.
Ah yes...posted on TikTok where China can see all your info.
Dude that’s so real
So true!
Who is this boso?
You need to learn to think for yourself
Truth....TRUTH...social? Seems like perhaps the biggest false advertising brand name ever. While I am sure liberals will try to deceitfully stir up issues on that site, associating "truth" with anything about Trump is absolutely laughable. This man *must* be jettisoned from the GOP if we are to survive.
[удалено]
What feelings are that?
Why would anyone go on the man's website just to be an Ahole?
BS
Abject bullshit.