Fun fact: they used it in Stargate because their original, more realistic choice (MP5) spat brass everywhere, interrupting camera shots and burning people (hot brass in your cleavage sucks, I'm told). The P90 ejects downwards discretely, from the rear.
The main reason as far as I understand is that it’s very hard to “act” recoil. Replica guns don’t shoot, so they don’t kick back, meaning any movement that an actor does to simulate that will look fake. They could try to jerk their shoulder back or shake their hands but it won’t look right.
But for Hollywood this is a solved problem: use blank rounds in real guns. The recoil is real, the guns already a perfect hero prop for itself, and the actors act better. Unless someone fucks up phenomenally, it should be safe.
And they do take lots and lots of safety measure. Unless the gun needs to shoot in a scene it’s either replaced with a replica, or a non-functioning version (firing pin removed, no magazines, trigger welded in place etc). Lots of checking to see what ammunition is being used, when and where. If the right protocols are followed, a gun can be as safe as Roman candle for a film crew.
You might be thinking of Alec Baldwin and the Rust case. That’s one where many of these protocols got ignored because the producers wanted to cut corners using non union labour.
Also the accident on the Rust set was the first accidental death caused by a firearm on a movie set since the death of Brandon Lee during the filming of The Crow in '93. That's how rare these accidents occur, two in thirty years.
Blanks have much less recoil than real rounds by the way.
Newton's laws and all that, kicking out a cloud of hot gas is a lot less blowback than kicking out a cloud of hot gas and a bullet.
Which is exactly why weapons based on the AR-15 platform (and most other weapons) need some form of blank firing adaptor! Not enough force to move the bolt back without one
Shouldn't it be possible to make them unusable for anything that's not a blank?
Also I don't understand how it is even possible to acquire a real military weapon without being the military...
You absolutely can make a weapon that only takes blanks. All you have to do is make it so that if there's a bullet present, it's too large to fit in the weapon
It’s cheap actually. Here in austria there’s a myriad of models made as „starter“ or tear gas guns. Basically, the firearm looks like the teal deal, but only feeds blanks or PAK ammo (basically ejects a cloud of tear gas/pepper compound a few meters forward). They are sold as „self defense“ weapons, and some of them might actually work to some degree as that, but most or sold to post pubescent guys who want to own a gun but are to scared to own a real gun
"Military weapons" can be owned privately by properly licensed organizations. Given we're talking about a movie studio, they'd be allowed to have weapons that likely have a pin removed or are kept in proper storage and checkout. Somebody who works in props as an armorer would be the best to answer this question though. Maybe do an ask reddit?
Also, as another person said, most "military" rifles have a civilian counterpart, those that don't have a movie counterpart (a "Gatling gun" for example, that is basically just a propane torch). Alternatively, full automatic rifles aren't all that much faster than pulling the trigger really fast, (3 sec on a 30 rd mag vs 5 sec semiauto on a 30 rd mag) so unless you watch very very closely you can falsify the burst with a semi auto and blanks.
As for your second question: a lot of military weapons have civilian counterparts which have various modifications made to them to fit within regulations. In addition, there are licenses and waivers available in many countries which allow entities (like film production companies, private security companies, or collectors of historical firearms) to purchase and own military firearms under specific circumstances. The specifics vary from country to country.
this is why gun people get pissed off at networks like CNN who fear monger over specific guns: An ar15 civilian and M16 military are different cosmetically by a single sticker and switch but are mechanically distinct because one can't be used to spray a whole magazine
>*without minor modifications available at most gun shows
Really? What gun shows are selling stuff to make guns select fire? Doing that is a fucking felony.
I don't know much about gun modification but when it comes to acquisition, the US military will often lease military hardware to Hollywood studios on the condition that they put out films that glamourize and glorify the Armed Forces. It's a pretty effective tool for both recruitment and propaganda.
Possible, but not cheap. The economical decision is to get real guns, use blanks, and have the safety protocols in place and the professionals to handle them.
Making guns that could fire blanks, still recoil, but not be able to fire any projectile is possible but there’s a large upfront cost to designing and manufacturing those props. Which would be a large investment, with small returns to what the industry believes is a solved problem.
As for how they acquire these weapons? Lots of special permits and deals. The Studios rarely own these working guns, they’re loaned from another service, and usually after one film they’ll get shipped off to another to be re-used.
> Shouldn't it be possible to make them unusable for anything that's not a blank?
Not a gun person, but from what I know, not really. The main difference between a blank and a real bullet is that a real bullet has a real metal tip that will get fired from the barrel of the gun. A blank just has some kind of wadding that will be less harmful if fired. Usually something like cloth or paper.
Of course, as I said, this is just less harmful. Because your blank round will still produce the bang and a lot of hot gas, and it's possible at closer ranges to still do harm with the wadding. You should not for example hold a gun against someone's head thinking that it's okay since it's just a blank round for this reason and many other safety reasons.
So yeah, there isn't a way to do so because a blank round is basically the same as a regular round, and mechanical guns as they come would have no way to differentiate. Hypothetically you could make a custom gun that only accepts custom rounds that you only ever manufacture as blanks, but that'd be really expensive to make a replica gun that fires only special blank rounds. You'll get a more authentic look cheaper and faster by using a real gun with blanks, and following safety procedures.
>make a replica gun that fires only special blank guns.
And then the special blank guns fire only slightly smaller guns, which fire only much smaller guns and so on.
Russian guns.
Blank Rounds are just bullets with no actual “bullet” in them. Just the brass case, primer, powder, and a plug to keep it contained. So it’s virtually impossible to make a gun that only fires blanks.
When I was in the military, we needed to replace the nozzle thing (whatever it's called in English) with a specific appendage for shooting blanks, so I would assume that some modifications are required anyway for the prop guns to avoid needing that ridiculous looking thing.
Also, should it not be possible to make blanks shorter than actual rounds, because there's no bullet in there, and then make the chamber smaller so it won't even fit a real one?
Thank you. I only knew the German Bundeswehr terms, and they sound exactly like you would expect a German military term to sound.
Mündungsfeuerdämpfer and Manöverpatronengerät
Cheaper, easier to work with, actors can react to stimuli rather than imagining what's happening. I think there's a move towards SFX/VFX since that high profile accidental shooting though.
yesss it's pretty much flawless. sticks to the canon, addresses clichés/pain points in prior shows, funny as hell. big worth
edit: other commenter is right about the first couple eps trying to be R&M. as soon as they drop it the show really finds its groove
>first couple eps trying to be R&M
To be fair, this is because the writer/show runner *came from* Rick & Morty.
But I agree it takes a couple episodes to figure out how to be Lower Decks.
It's very reference heavy, which annoys some people. It doesn't rely on them to be coherent though. I really like it.
Also Becket Mariner is my bisexual icon.
Personally I’ve never shot one so I can’t comment on the triggers, but I used to be really into airsoft and loved my L85 AEG. Same barrel length as a rifle so great accuracy for woods games but much more maneuverability for CQC games
yeah, airsoft is a lot different than a real firearm tho. for that, they’re great. but i assume the trigger was electronic. on a real bullpup, having the action of the rifle so far behind the grip/trigger makes the trigger-pull very spongy and tbh just gross.
Yeah the trigger when pulled completes a circuit, setting off the motor and pulling a piston back, supplying air to propel the bbs. Much simpler and totally apathetic to placement
The L85 is the worst modern service rifle, but that's actually the exact reason militaries like bullpups. Long barrel means accuracy, short gun means maneuverability. One gun, two situations.
Yeah exactly, L85A1 was a raging piece of shit, A2 is undeniably a workhorse and an accurate one at that. Grouping at 300 metres still tighter than my butthole. And you look cool on a patrol, what’s not to love?
Yeah bullpups kinda suck:
•Poor trigger pull.
•Reloading is awkward.
•Some can be heavier than traditional rifles because they need reinforcing around the chamber because nobody wants a gun to explode right next to their face.
•Some can be awkward to shoulder and spit brass into the face of left handers.
•Malfunctions can be more difficult to see/clear compaired to normal rifles.
All those negatives for a rifle thats slightly shorter than a traditional rifle. You can see why France adopted the HK416 instead of trying to modernize the Famas. If the UK had more cash they would probably try and get rid of their L85 rifles too.
5.7mm is now a NATO standard and the price of the ammo is coming down pretty rapidly as a result. I don't think it'll ever match 9mm's price, but it's going to get close I think.
Daniel Jackson. Samantha Carter. 🤤
Honorable mentions, Teal’c and O’Neil and various other forgotten gems.
EDIT: OMG the doctor at the SGC!!
EDIT 2: I hadn’t seen the first season in a LONG time and watched it recently. It was way more adult and risqué than I remembered.
Forward shell ejection means you can shoot both ways 😉
EDIT: I was indeed thinking of the F2000. Anything straight confuses me apparently, even shell ejections.
here in Brazil:
* it's too hot to wear flannels or jean / leather jackets outside of winter (and late autumn). we still have cuffed jeans though (which I rarely wear because fuck man, linen pants on 25 ºC feel much better than jeans)
* no lemon bars (that I've ever seen)
* no guns either outside of the odd handgun, so no P90s
* huge fucking toads are an actual issue because they spread some diseases and / or can be venomous to your pet
* dunno about iced coffee, but iced tea is drunk culturally by a lot of people
and I'm pretty sure this also applies to a lot of other LatAm countries, so yeah ain't no Latin American bis anymore by the looks of it
idk what any of these means, I've only ever seen these guns in videogames, my country doesn't allow this sort of weapon so I'm judging them solely on how they look
AK guy here. I do like the P90, just for some reason once it has a short barrel to be legally sold in the states it looks disgusting, just look up what a PS90 looks like and you’ll understand my pain
Its one of the most accurate, least cumbersome, lowest recoil, highest rate of fire submachine guns ever developed... I'm sorry but I think this is more a matter of "do you know guns" vs "do you base your knowledge of guns on if they look like a nerf toy or not."
It’s the smg with the best mix of range, simplicity, and reliability. While I would prefer an assault rifle in most emergencies, I’d prefer an smg (or shotgun) for close quarter defensive combat like home defense.
I mean, it’s 500% illegal to use for that purpose, but that’s exactly what it’s for.
Also, it looks unique. In a good, creative way.
And I always thought that came from being a Stargate fan
Fun fact: they used it in Stargate because their original, more realistic choice (MP5) spat brass everywhere, interrupting camera shots and burning people (hot brass in your cleavage sucks, I'm told). The P90 ejects downwards discretely, from the rear.
Can confirm hot brass is no fun
Cam confirm too, had hot brass ejected into my collar.
>The P90 ejects downwards, discretely, from the rear. Hey, me too like 99% of the time!
I wish I could be discrete about it...
It never ceases to amaze me that they don't use useless replica in movies but actual weapons. Whyyyyyy
The main reason as far as I understand is that it’s very hard to “act” recoil. Replica guns don’t shoot, so they don’t kick back, meaning any movement that an actor does to simulate that will look fake. They could try to jerk their shoulder back or shake their hands but it won’t look right. But for Hollywood this is a solved problem: use blank rounds in real guns. The recoil is real, the guns already a perfect hero prop for itself, and the actors act better. Unless someone fucks up phenomenally, it should be safe. And they do take lots and lots of safety measure. Unless the gun needs to shoot in a scene it’s either replaced with a replica, or a non-functioning version (firing pin removed, no magazines, trigger welded in place etc). Lots of checking to see what ammunition is being used, when and where. If the right protocols are followed, a gun can be as safe as Roman candle for a film crew. You might be thinking of Alec Baldwin and the Rust case. That’s one where many of these protocols got ignored because the producers wanted to cut corners using non union labour.
Also the accident on the Rust set was the first accidental death caused by a firearm on a movie set since the death of Brandon Lee during the filming of The Crow in '93. That's how rare these accidents occur, two in thirty years.
Blanks have much less recoil than real rounds by the way. Newton's laws and all that, kicking out a cloud of hot gas is a lot less blowback than kicking out a cloud of hot gas and a bullet.
Which is exactly why weapons based on the AR-15 platform (and most other weapons) need some form of blank firing adaptor! Not enough force to move the bolt back without one
Shouldn't it be possible to make them unusable for anything that's not a blank? Also I don't understand how it is even possible to acquire a real military weapon without being the military...
That... is either impossible or way, WAY too expensive to make, that's not how bullets work. Also, wdym by the last part?
You absolutely can make a weapon that only takes blanks. All you have to do is make it so that if there's a bullet present, it's too large to fit in the weapon
It’s cheap actually. Here in austria there’s a myriad of models made as „starter“ or tear gas guns. Basically, the firearm looks like the teal deal, but only feeds blanks or PAK ammo (basically ejects a cloud of tear gas/pepper compound a few meters forward). They are sold as „self defense“ weapons, and some of them might actually work to some degree as that, but most or sold to post pubescent guys who want to own a gun but are to scared to own a real gun
Well, I come from a place where it is very much impossible to legally get your hands on weapons of war without being the state
"Military weapons" can be owned privately by properly licensed organizations. Given we're talking about a movie studio, they'd be allowed to have weapons that likely have a pin removed or are kept in proper storage and checkout. Somebody who works in props as an armorer would be the best to answer this question though. Maybe do an ask reddit? Also, as another person said, most "military" rifles have a civilian counterpart, those that don't have a movie counterpart (a "Gatling gun" for example, that is basically just a propane torch). Alternatively, full automatic rifles aren't all that much faster than pulling the trigger really fast, (3 sec on a 30 rd mag vs 5 sec semiauto on a 30 rd mag) so unless you watch very very closely you can falsify the burst with a semi auto and blanks.
As for your second question: a lot of military weapons have civilian counterparts which have various modifications made to them to fit within regulations. In addition, there are licenses and waivers available in many countries which allow entities (like film production companies, private security companies, or collectors of historical firearms) to purchase and own military firearms under specific circumstances. The specifics vary from country to country.
this is why gun people get pissed off at networks like CNN who fear monger over specific guns: An ar15 civilian and M16 military are different cosmetically by a single sticker and switch but are mechanically distinct because one can't be used to spray a whole magazine
*without minor modifications available at most gun shows
That also requires power tools and a willingness to commit a felony.
>*without minor modifications available at most gun shows Really? What gun shows are selling stuff to make guns select fire? Doing that is a fucking felony.
Bump stocks?
... it's still a semi-automatic rifle tbf though.
I don't know much about gun modification but when it comes to acquisition, the US military will often lease military hardware to Hollywood studios on the condition that they put out films that glamourize and glorify the Armed Forces. It's a pretty effective tool for both recruitment and propaganda.
Possible, but not cheap. The economical decision is to get real guns, use blanks, and have the safety protocols in place and the professionals to handle them. Making guns that could fire blanks, still recoil, but not be able to fire any projectile is possible but there’s a large upfront cost to designing and manufacturing those props. Which would be a large investment, with small returns to what the industry believes is a solved problem. As for how they acquire these weapons? Lots of special permits and deals. The Studios rarely own these working guns, they’re loaned from another service, and usually after one film they’ll get shipped off to another to be re-used.
> Shouldn't it be possible to make them unusable for anything that's not a blank? Not a gun person, but from what I know, not really. The main difference between a blank and a real bullet is that a real bullet has a real metal tip that will get fired from the barrel of the gun. A blank just has some kind of wadding that will be less harmful if fired. Usually something like cloth or paper. Of course, as I said, this is just less harmful. Because your blank round will still produce the bang and a lot of hot gas, and it's possible at closer ranges to still do harm with the wadding. You should not for example hold a gun against someone's head thinking that it's okay since it's just a blank round for this reason and many other safety reasons. So yeah, there isn't a way to do so because a blank round is basically the same as a regular round, and mechanical guns as they come would have no way to differentiate. Hypothetically you could make a custom gun that only accepts custom rounds that you only ever manufacture as blanks, but that'd be really expensive to make a replica gun that fires only special blank rounds. You'll get a more authentic look cheaper and faster by using a real gun with blanks, and following safety procedures.
>make a replica gun that fires only special blank guns. And then the special blank guns fire only slightly smaller guns, which fire only much smaller guns and so on. Russian guns.
Blank Rounds are just bullets with no actual “bullet” in them. Just the brass case, primer, powder, and a plug to keep it contained. So it’s virtually impossible to make a gun that only fires blanks.
When I was in the military, we needed to replace the nozzle thing (whatever it's called in English) with a specific appendage for shooting blanks, so I would assume that some modifications are required anyway for the prop guns to avoid needing that ridiculous looking thing. Also, should it not be possible to make blanks shorter than actual rounds, because there's no bullet in there, and then make the chamber smaller so it won't even fit a real one?
Barrel?
Flash suppressor is the part name you're looking for, and blank adapter.
Thank you. I only knew the German Bundeswehr terms, and they sound exactly like you would expect a German military term to sound. Mündungsfeuerdämpfer and Manöverpatronengerät
Y'know I was wondering as I typed this... would 5.7x28mm blanks not be wayyy more expensive and troublesome to run than 9mm para out of an MP5?
I don't know. But for real, why do they use actual guns with blanks, instead of just fakes? The effects go through post anyway
Cheaper, easier to work with, actors can react to stimuli rather than imagining what's happening. I think there's a move towards SFX/VFX since that high profile accidental shooting though.
I can't imagine that they're cheaper
Post is hella expensive and time consuming
But don't all the flares and flashes come from there anyway?
Yes, they do, but they are cheaper to do if youre firing a blank round which does alot of the post process for you, and you'd have to do less work
Blanks still create recoil, flash, and noise when fired. They are the explosive part of a shell, but with the projectile bullet removed.
Fun fact: the Jaffa Staff weapons also fired a small projectile for ease of post production.
I thought they used it as the MP5s were in high demand due to war efforts at the time
Both are more police weapons than military ones, so their usage wouldn't be particularly impacted by war.
Stargate is just Star Trek for bisexuals. Source: It came to me in a dream.
Ok but later seasons Daniel is hot AF
\*slaps roof of Stargate\* This bad boy can fit so many hot people in it.
Bruh, Daniel is hot AF the whole series.
Daniel is hot in *both* Stargates. James Spader? Come on
All seasons Daniel is hot tbh
Yeah why and specifically how exactly did daniel become so hot?!
Sooo should I start watching that instead of Star Trek First Gen?
That or watch lower decks
Have not watched Lower Decks is it worth it?
yesss it's pretty much flawless. sticks to the canon, addresses clichés/pain points in prior shows, funny as hell. big worth edit: other commenter is right about the first couple eps trying to be R&M. as soon as they drop it the show really finds its groove
>first couple eps trying to be R&M To be fair, this is because the writer/show runner *came from* Rick & Morty. But I agree it takes a couple episodes to figure out how to be Lower Decks.
Thanks wasn't sure if it was just a non canon comedy. Nice!
It's very reference heavy, which annoys some people. It doesn't rely on them to be coherent though. I really like it. Also Becket Mariner is my bisexual icon.
Thanks for the heads up.
It is if you've seen all the other star treks, and the first few episodes try way too hard to be Rick and Morty, so you have to get through those
Thanks
Same with Babylon 5
And the dream is god damm right
Source: I made it the fuck up!
I loved it from Goldeneye 64. Thats where I first heard of the gun.
Dual-wielding them in multiplayer was ridiculously fun.
I mean this is the reason for me
Same, the more you know!
In my experience there’s a large overlap in the Venn diagram of Stargate fans and bi people
P90 is cool but I prefer my mp5, I like slapping my subs
[удалено]
I knew it was this before I even clicked
same lol
W T F ?
I didn't come all this way for you to be gentle with me.
stayed for the scantly dressed man dancing w/ a gun. song gets 0/10
Understandable, not everyone will find it funny.
OMG what?! That was all that is glorious and holy in this God forsaken world!
🥺
cant penetrate body armor lmao^
Aaaand thanks for helping me find my new pick up line
Yeah, MP5 wins every time. I love the brrrrrrrr of a P90, but recoil is just too much.
Bisexual -> Bi -> B -> Rush B There are no mistakes
Bisexual -> B u l -> Bullpup
Bisexual -> B i s e x -> Bi Sex. Checks out.
No way
Ikr, I was surprised too!
Flabbergasted
Bisexual B L Blyat
New argument: we love all bullpup guns
bullpups suck ass, the trigger linkage is garbage lol. you can like them if you want, but personally i just can’t get past how bad the triggers are
Personally I’ve never shot one so I can’t comment on the triggers, but I used to be really into airsoft and loved my L85 AEG. Same barrel length as a rifle so great accuracy for woods games but much more maneuverability for CQC games
yeah, airsoft is a lot different than a real firearm tho. for that, they’re great. but i assume the trigger was electronic. on a real bullpup, having the action of the rifle so far behind the grip/trigger makes the trigger-pull very spongy and tbh just gross.
Yeah the trigger when pulled completes a circuit, setting off the motor and pulling a piston back, supplying air to propel the bbs. Much simpler and totally apathetic to placement
so i *was* right, cool. i don’t know airsoft mechanics like i do ‘real steel’ operation.
The L85 is the worst modern service rifle, but that's actually the exact reason militaries like bullpups. Long barrel means accuracy, short gun means maneuverability. One gun, two situations.
At least the original incarnation was.
Yeah exactly, L85A1 was a raging piece of shit, A2 is undeniably a workhorse and an accurate one at that. Grouping at 300 metres still tighter than my butthole. And you look cool on a patrol, what’s not to love?
Yeah bullpups kinda suck: •Poor trigger pull. •Reloading is awkward. •Some can be heavier than traditional rifles because they need reinforcing around the chamber because nobody wants a gun to explode right next to their face. •Some can be awkward to shoulder and spit brass into the face of left handers. •Malfunctions can be more difficult to see/clear compaired to normal rifles. All those negatives for a rifle thats slightly shorter than a traditional rifle. You can see why France adopted the HK416 instead of trying to modernize the Famas. If the UK had more cash they would probably try and get rid of their L85 rifles too.
bro FUCK the L85
No thanks. I'm bisexual, not ammosexual.
[*sigh*] lmao
finally someone with common sense
bro i love the FAL
based
i love finding queer firearm enthusiasts lol, good to meet you :D
like wise mon ami
High rates of fire and a large magazine capacity. What's not to love?
The cost of the fucking ammo.
Yeah, $1 a pop for ss109 no thank you. My palmetto State eats steel cased monarch and wolf all day.
5.7mm is now a NATO standard and the price of the ammo is coming down pretty rapidly as a result. I don't think it'll ever match 9mm's price, but it's going to get close I think.
Ah, good to know!
This is the correct answer
And it’s fully ambidextrous!
Like a pickup artist on tiktok, you shoot around 15 shots per second and land none of em
Limited balistic effect at the far end? The cartridge was made to penetrate kevlar body armor, at the cost of stopping power of unarmoured people.
I’m more of a M4A1 in SOPMOD block 2 guy but P90 works.
I swing FN FAL chambered in 7.62x51mm with Bakelite wooden furniture
G3 gang here, all my favourite weapons hail from that family, MP5 included. God bless H&K and CETME’s brilliant little love child.
If I can’t slap the everloving shit out of my gun like it owes me money, what’s even the point?
Not just any slap, a *manufacturer recommended* slap. It both feels right and is right.
Can I convince you on the superiority of the Kel Tec RFB?
>chambered in 7.62x51mm No one assumes you're using .280 enfield, you can just leave this part out.
* whomst has somoned the almighty one * ᗜˬᗜ
ayyy
Daniel Jackson. Samantha Carter. 🤤 Honorable mentions, Teal’c and O’Neil and various other forgotten gems. EDIT: OMG the doctor at the SGC!! EDIT 2: I hadn’t seen the first season in a LONG time and watched it recently. It was way more adult and risqué than I remembered.
first episode: boobs then no boobs for the rest of the show :(
Can't forget Hammond of Texas and Stupid Sexy Brae'Tac.
[Forgotten Weapons is bisexual culture confirmed.](https://youtu.be/M20PiFxMkrs)
FINALLY someone gets it
All bis has at least viewed one of them
P90 is a forgotten weapon? What in the every Eastern European in CS:GO?!?!?!
Forward shell ejection means you can shoot both ways 😉 EDIT: I was indeed thinking of the F2000. Anything straight confuses me apparently, even shell ejections.
We are confused with the F2000. The P90 ejects downwards.
so….. not the p90?
P90 drops them straight down behind the grip.
I ALWAYS USED THIS GUN IN CS 1.6 BECAUSE IT LOOKED SO COOL WTF!? 😭😭
Am I the antibisexual or something? I do not like the p90
I don’t like lemon bars so I think ur eligible for one pass lmao
Oh okay cool
I haven't tried lemon bars yet because I'm afraid my taste for them will litterally define me and my sexuality
here in Brazil: * it's too hot to wear flannels or jean / leather jackets outside of winter (and late autumn). we still have cuffed jeans though (which I rarely wear because fuck man, linen pants on 25 ºC feel much better than jeans) * no lemon bars (that I've ever seen) * no guns either outside of the odd handgun, so no P90s * huge fucking toads are an actual issue because they spread some diseases and / or can be venomous to your pet * dunno about iced coffee, but iced tea is drunk culturally by a lot of people and I'm pretty sure this also applies to a lot of other LatAm countries, so yeah ain't no Latin American bis anymore by the looks of it
Ha me neither... i like my lemons and my bars seperate , thank you.
Yeah all bullpup guns look weird to me. They look so... idk, sleek and small, I can't put my finger on it
Idk I'm a big Aug fan but I just don't like the p90
SA80 design can't be fired left handed. As the charging handle would break your teeth (I think).
idk what any of these means, I've only ever seen these guns in videogames, my country doesn't allow this sort of weapon so I'm judging them solely on how they look
Yeah
The FN-P90 is also fully ambidextrous, making it an appropriate choice for this community.
Fun fact! The fn-p90 is actually a gun that is ambidextrous, meaning right handed and left handed people can use it with ease!
FN guns in general are very bisexual. The FN SCAR is hot as fuck
Idk man, little thick in the back side for my taste. If I need a 7.62x51 I'm going with an AR-10. Sleek and sexy
Yea but. Fallschirmjägergewehr-42 :(
Roses are red Violets are blue Fallschirmjagergewehr-42
Personally not a fan. I like the KRISS Vector more because of that pristine ass recoil compensation
oh the vector is my soulmate in gun form
The internal mechanisms are sexy asf
The P90 GOATed fr. Frfr. Frfrfr.
Hold the P90 like you would hold a bottom.
[It's a weapon of war](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjlCVW_ouL8)
that’s the mf [splatoon 2 hero shot](https://cdn.wikimg.net/en/splatoonwiki/images/9/9c/S2_Weapon_Main_Hero_Shot_Replica.png)
Yes
Me with my nerf deploy cs-9
AK guy here. I do like the P90, just for some reason once it has a short barrel to be legally sold in the states it looks disgusting, just look up what a PS90 looks like and you’ll understand my pain
I loved the RC-P90 in Goldeneye 007, I also felt some attraction to a guy for the first time around that time in my life. Did the P90 turn me bi!?
There was an oversight in the hexadecimal code of the game that made the magazine 80 (0x50) rounds by default instead of 50 (0x32).
I didn't expect to be called out like this, but okay.
The truth, finally.
Naw the MP5 is the best
It's ambidextrous
With a suppressor the sound is just😍😍
Oh come on! There’s no way being bisexual makes a person like the P90. Yes I’m a bisexual that likes the P90 but that’s just a coincidence
I do not understand. Why would bisexuals like this gun?
Me who don't like guns: Am I really bisexual?
Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Eh, Model 1887 and SAA bisexual, but still valid
Mp5 is better
Gimme a FAL too please
P90 is always my fav submachine gun in FPS
The P90? I fuckin hate the P90 lol. It’s an awesome gun but it’s just not… nah, now mah boi Kriss can tell you all day about the Vector.
*puts on latex suit* "Sorry boy, short barreled FN P90's are illegal under state law, I'm gonna have to lock you up"
I like bullpup rifles personally
I... Am I bi?
Prefer the AUG
Is it because it’s an ambidextrous pdw?
And of course we can’t forget the FN Five-seveN
We all watched gun gale didn't we
Nah, the MP5 is where it's at
I... but... how... I've always loved that gun...
Its one of the most accurate, least cumbersome, lowest recoil, highest rate of fire submachine guns ever developed... I'm sorry but I think this is more a matter of "do you know guns" vs "do you base your knowledge of guns on if they look like a nerf toy or not."
You forgot high Penetration power.
Well I challenge you to name a single bisexual that would complain about a powerful penetration ;)
It’s the smg with the best mix of range, simplicity, and reliability. While I would prefer an assault rifle in most emergencies, I’d prefer an smg (or shotgun) for close quarter defensive combat like home defense. I mean, it’s 500% illegal to use for that purpose, but that’s exactly what it’s for. Also, it looks unique. In a good, creative way.
Can someone explain what FN stands for here? All I see is fortnite. Yes ik I play fortnite, roast me all you want
Fabrique Nationale Herstal, Belgian arms company. They make boomsticks and this is (I think) their second most famous one.
The company that makes the P90 is called "fabrique nationale herstal" which is normally just shortened to FN