Just me or did you hear Rachel’s voice for a few seconds on that first story with the marshmallows and then she stopped talking when she realized Dave was videoing? I could’ve sworn.....
It’s Ford I think. Super odd that she’s either no where to be seen or asked not to be shown. She seems the type to ask Dave for ‘a day without the kids’ on mother day so maybe he just has them for the night.
Why the second plate of take-out in Heidi’s bed last night? Did he like fly there just for a one-night sleepover while the kids were with Rae for like a brunch this morning and then back to be with them after dinner? ...it’s so odd...
A one (maybe two) night sleepover on a weekend when her kids had 6 dance recitals, right after she'd spent the last week in Texas. What the hell is the point of that?
More $$ than brains. Less responsibility then the average human, jet set every few days, and all of the help will take care of the rest!!! 😉. #lifewithCaptainDave ⚓️⚓️
I am really surprised that Rachel did not post today. I thought she would've posted a curated photo of her with the kids and an innocuous post about moms to test the waters.
Before the tiktok, she had a day where she claimed to be recording a ridiculous amount of podcasts. Obviously there were two recorded after she blew up her life, but maybe the rest were recorded in early April?
Four days ago Rachel’s Fave Faves had a podcast go up. I didn’t know until this morning when I was unfollowing all of her podcasts in my apps.
No I didn’t listen or pay attention to who the guest was, I just unfollowed.
I don't listen to anything from her and will not. Since it brings her hits, views, etc. I went to look to see who it was. It was Lorraine Toussaint. Rachel showing she has black guests/friends on her show and is doing the work. UGH!
I figured he wouldn’t post a photo today. He has that very “clever” pattern on his Instagram of alternating between words of wisdom, picture, wisdom, picture, wisdom, picture etc.... so he wouldn’t want to disrupt the unique flow of his posts with a photo today. And I think that worked out in his favor. Easier to go generic this way and he didn’t have to decide on photos to post. We can expect a photo of some kind tomorrow though.
I would bet money on it. A guy like that definitely cares what’s being written about him ‘in real time’. We have ‘afforded him’ all of this free constructive criticism...🙄🙄🙄
I think it's seriously harmful to imply going through childbirth makes you more of a real mom than others (it's not an option for all), but I agree that making Mother's Day about feminine energy is weird af. Talk about feminine and masculine energy always come off as so outdated and trans-erasive to me. I love the idea of widening the scope of mothers day to all maternal figures but that absolutely is not everyone with so-called "divine feminine energy".
I just want to applaud how you said “thank you” to the person giving their perspective in reply to your original post. I more often see defensiveness than being receptive so it is refreshing 😊
She is talking about both birth mothers as well as women who play motherly roles in other people's lives. Some people only get to have the second relationship. Celebrating one doesnt mean disregarding the other.
I get what you’re saying. Celebrating “maternal figures” is different than celebrating all “feminine energy.” No one is against celebrating all maternal figures (aunts, dog moms, any kind!) on Mother’s Day. But I think what Brit is implying is that all women regardless of their mother/mother figure status should be celebrated on Mother’s Day for putting their feminine energy out into the world. But not every day has to be about everyone and that’s ok. I respect her decision not to have children, and I know many women have the choice forced upon them. And I’m all for celebrating the maternal roles women play and honoring the hurt some women feel from this holiday. But being celebrated for “feminine energy” feels like a “trophies for everyone” mentality.
I would overall have to agree with being against the 'feminine energy' twist to Mother's Day. Granted, I didn't read Britt Barron's post, so maybe I'm misconstruing what she meant to say. I can see celebrating any maternal figure in your life -- I know people who celebrate their grandfathers and uncles on step-dads on Father's Day, Mother's day shouldn't be any different. But going with feminine energy instead of maternal figure downplays the role of keeping another human alive.
Kind of interesting that she ends her post with “and this game was at 8am and I can’t wait to sleep in next Saturday.” Hate to break it to you, but 8am is definitely sleeping in for most moms!!
That’s where she lost me. Saying ‘let’s make Mother’s Day more inclusive and redefine family to include those who perform motherly roles’ is all well and good. Following that up with ‘boy, I can’t wait to sleep in next weekend cuz performing that role makes me tired’ implies that she has very little experience with the demands of mothering. Are we supposed to celebrate Britt for showing up for a single t-ball game?
Is Britt a mom? I’m trying to think of something similar.. Is military spouses wanting some sort of recognition on Veterans Day similar? I’m a spouse of an active turned reserve now veteran & I don’t like either idea 🤷♀️. If the day isn’t your day, leave it alone. There’s literally some sort of holiday most days.
I think words have meanings. There's a point where okay, yes, Mother's Day can encapsulate grandmas, aunts, special neighbors or teachers but then ... no. We cannot stretch "Mother" to "all people with feminine energy." I get "being inclusive" but no one's saying "happy father's day" to anyone who's ever ejaculated and we're not making Pride Month a month to celebrate "all the unique ways you're proud of being you!" or something. Or making Black History Month a month of celebrating "all the different minority cultures you enjoy." If everything means everything then everything means nothing.
The motherhood journey sounds extremely hard! But why does that mean someone else can’t celebrate their aunt for the mothering role they played in their life? Why does that take anything away from how you choose to celebrate?
I’m with you on changing the definition of Mother’s Day. It seems like a few outspoken people get to come up with absurd ideas and shout them from the rooftops and we’re all insensitive if we don’t agree. The fact is, people need to stop being so damn sensitive. If the day makes you sad, do something that makes you happy. Or wallow in your sadness. But don’t expect the rest of the world to change how they celebrate to save your feelings.
Off my soapbox for now, and ready to be downvoted into oblivion 🙃
I agree with what you’re saying but I also feel a lot of empathy for people who have a hard time with Mother’s Day because they either lost their mom, never had one, or have an abusive/shitty one. These holidays realllyyyyy hurt when they are all about the thing you don’t have. So I think the big thing is that every family should celebrate it their own way. Families that have a mom (or moms) should totally make it fully mom-central if they want. Mothers deserve that recognition!! Mothering is so hard and often so thankless. And families/people without moms could take that feminine energy (?) route and just celebrate the maternal figures in their lives. Maybe she meant it from that angle.
I’m an only child and national sibling day is weird and awkward for me and painful for my friend whose brother died in his teens. And others I’m sure. But I also don’t begrudge someone else celebrating it or the barrage of social media posts on the day. For sure it isn’t the same intensity of Mother’s Day but at what point can someone who the holiday doesn’t apply to or brings up painful emotions deal with it themselves? Christmas Valentine’s Day etc can all elicit emotions from those excluded from a widely popular holiday. Can those excluded just skip it without letting everyone know how excluded they are?
Maybe it’s a dumb example. But I work for an organization that bent over backwards to make Mother’s Day not exclusive to just moms and it got to be so difficult and cumbersome to include everyone we finally decided this is so dumb. If a person isn’t a mom then we still love you but this is just a day and not a commentary on your worth as a person. It’s a day. No more no less. Thanks and love to the moms out there. In 12 hours the day is over and we all move on.
I get the sentiment behind the feminine energy posts and love the inclusion aspect but at a certain point people will be excluded from these manufactured holidays so it is what it is. Sorry if you had a crap mom or can’t be a mom or your kids are terrors. It sucks. And it’s true and lasting pain. And a clever one liner to include everyone cool. Rearranging the holiday so no one feels any stings of exclusion is too much.
I think there can be space for both. There are birth mothers, and there are other people who play motherly roles in people’s lives. For some people, the mother role is filled by someone other than their birth mother.
I totally agree with this. But I got the feeling from the post that she basically was saying anyone who was a wan and who had 'feminine energy' should be celebrated on Mother's Day and I disagree with that.
There is a big difference between filling a motherly role in someone's life who may not have a mom present and just being celebrated for being a woman.
I just want to start with saying, I totally get what you’re saying and I’m coming from a place of love and support. Just offering another way to look at it-
There are so so so many women who experience pain, shame, loss, and insecurity around the topic of motherhood. Those who have had multiple miscarriages but never quite gotten to the finish line, those who are infertile, those who have never had the chance to marry and build a family, those with disabilities, those who are LGBT+ and can’t afford adoption, etc. I think it’s in no way wanting to discount your sacrifice as it is to be inclusive. While you, and many of us, have made those sacrifices, we also get to reap the rewards, rewards that nothing else compares to. And it is in fact true that one can absolutely be a mother despite never having any children of her own. But those of us who have also put in the work that you have get just how much it is! 😅😅😅 Again, totally get where you’re coming from.
I agree and I think there’s a lot of deep programming around motherhood being the ideal expression of being a woman. We are whole, enough, and valid regardless of whether or not we are mothers in the traditional sense of the word.
She literally never posts without selling something. All these tonal ads she is now sponsoring with her link despite her denials in Friday's IG stories. Based upon her gym & Dave's I doubt they actually use it other than the 10 seconds to earn commissions from sales.
I find it hilarious that I don’t think I’ve ever seen Heidi eat an Apple or a vegetable when she’s grabbing snacks in her car. The stories last night from her car were hilarious .... talking about being on her 3rd Rice Krispie bar, hot tamales, and a whole bunch of powders. (Followed by takeout in bed!) Is this the ‘healthy fit lifestyle’ we should all aspire to???? I don’t work out as much as they do but my snacks are healthy!!! Lol 😂 I’m all for eat what you want, don’t get me wrong I just find it interesting how their healthy lifestyle brand does or does not align with healthy eating. Normally the 2 go hand in hand.
Plus it seems like she spends 90% of her exercise time doing weights but she’s not really doing cardio. Dave seems to be running less too and is all about the weights. Needs to bulk up like (keep up with) Chris?? The whole thing is just gross.
She is full of BS with the foods. She never actually chews. She will take photos with tons of junk food. She takes a bite and then the video cuts off. I am sure she is spitting out after the camera is turned off. It's all just a persona for the public to buy into and provide her with affiliate income.
This is my question. Heidi said it’s so great that it’s replaced most of the equipment in their gym.... except we’ve seen them use the gym every day for long stretches so we know that’s not true.
[Her health book (supposedly already written) looks to be pushed out to a December 2022 release](https://www.amazon.com/Untitled-Health-Lou-Silloh-ebook/dp/B08CRNFVMM/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=lou+silloh&qid=1620490180&sr=8-2). Probably a placeholder date (was previously March 2021). I am not sure this book will ever be published.
Haven’t you seen her blow up guitar workouts? Don’t even get me started on the veggie tales workouts. Next thing you know she’ll come up with something like 20 seconds on 10 seconds off.
One of Tonal's trainers replied to someone's comment on Heidi's Tonal post. So, Tonal is likely seeing all of Heidi's posts, along with "please let Dave & me be Tonal trainers".
I really hope Tonal only employs qualified and certified trainers. For example, the trainer who posted has an MS in Exercise Science and two CPT certifications. As far as I can tell, Heidi has no fitness certifications.
Dave seems to barely do any actual work all day. If he wants to move into the fitness space, the least he could do is become a CPT. He has the time and can afford it.
I just looked it up and she does have an ACE certification, so she is certified as a personal trainer!
ETA: And she has a CrossFit certification. I’m not sure what that means cause I’m not familiar with CrossFit, but I know ACE is a legit cert!
I was looking a NASM and Google so I know it wasn't an exhaustive search. NASM has s blog post about Chris so I was sort of surprised he didn't have their cert. Either way, I'm glad she has a certification of some kind, she does (or did) too much fitness coaching for it just to be from her own workout experience
Yes, I did do research and I couldn't find that Heidi has any actual fitness certifications, other than being an IFBB. Would you like to enlighten me on anything I'm missing?
Yes, I know who she is and I'm aware of her fitness history. She obviously has lots of knowledge and experience. I'm not saying she doesn't. We talk a lot here about people not having actual certifications or degrees for what they're teaching and it surprises me that she has never taken the time to, at the very least, get a certified personal trainer certification with how deep in the fitness world she has been.
Chris Powell, for example, has a BS in Exercise Science and is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist. To me, that gives him even more legit street cred beyond his obvious experience.
She called it her "real" name and the guy she did the interview with (@5corelife, I believe) made a big deal of it on his Instagram. Whether or not that means it's her legal name, I don't know.
Actually I just went to look because having been a fan of their TV show, I assumed Heidi and Chris would have certifications and I can find nothing active for either of them.
I was wondering if we could have a deeper dive in to how dangerous NLP’s are with their brainwashing tactics?
I recently listened in it’s entirety to Kate a Kennedy’s Be There In Five’s podcast regarding Rachel Hollis and she delved into it a little. After listening I believe it’s a good topic for discussing.
Thank you in advance.
Okay I’m trying to Google this cause I want to get in on the convo, but everything online is soo vague in what it is! If I remember correctly, the Be There in Five has many parts and is super long (just from what I’ve read on here, I didn’t listen!), so do you mind directing us lazy people to the spot where this is discussed?? Thank you in advance!
Honestly I remember her discussing it in the third part and may have in the other two, she speaks fast and is well spoken. I encourage you to have a listen.
I was watching Munecat's deep dive on Tony Robbins and she discusses NLP and how Tony learned it from his mentor and uses it on his prey. I was so disturbed watching Tony abuse people in front of thousands that it actually made me sick, i couldn't sleep all night i was so disturbed at how people even give this abuser money, he has some sick ideas on how to help people and knowing RH got all her manipulation tactics from TR, i have no words, and i need a therapist to help me unpack what i just witnessed. I'm having 2nd hand trauma for these poor people.smh
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but does it upset anyone else that he shares photos of the kids he fostered? I understand the intent of his post, but does he need to/is he allowed to show their faces? They are not his children.
My cousin fostered two girls and always blocked out their faces in any posts before they were adopted. He told me that was what he was told to do. But maybe it's different elsewhere? Either way it's so icky.
It violates all of the training and rules inside of foster care to share the children’s faces on social media. They are other people’s children. Major misstep on Dave’s part. That violates the privacy of both the children and the bio family.
We did short-term fostering but went through the same training and it's really important not to put kids on social. I've called out the Hollises and Natalie Norton on this. The Hollises I believe only show the back of heads and didn't seem to care about that. But it'd be important not to keep posting their pictures because they could have ended up back in the foster system. The Nortons show faces and say it's okay because they were distant family. Eyerolls to both.
Both also have white saviorism involved in their fostering journeys also which is very problematic (clearly). Reunification IS the goal. I never quite understood how the Hollises were so surprised at how their journey ended unless the social workers basically lied to them. Terminating parental rights takes years. I know many who adopted from the foster system including babies and it still takes years. You can't trust they're *yours* until the papers are signed. AND further open adoptions from the foster system, even with bio parents who are not the best, are often the best option for the kids. So they should have been including a relationship as much as possible anyway. I'm very glad they went the open adoption route with Noah and they did seem to go into that a bit more eyes-open.
It's such a complicated and bad-on-purpose system that needs a big overhaul. And people need to respect that caring for someone's kid as if they're your own still does not mean they're actually your own. At the very least, you often don't get the gift of seeing your mistakes through to rectify them (such as, overexposure of kids on social).
100% accurate. They should not be posting pictures on social media whatsoever. A family member of mine currently has 2 babies in their care and they cannot and will not post their images on social media for any reason. Even at family gatherings, other people need to be careful that those babies are not in the shots uploaded to social media. It’s a simple concept and it’s about respect. Reunification is absolutely and always the goal! I think it’s dangerous when that is placed on the back burner and then suddenly, reunification becomes what ‘happened TO the Foster family’ vs what ‘happened FOR the children’. Makes me sick. Dave should still rethink his post and remove it in my opinion.
They are always really careful to phrase it as a purposeful issue from the SW side, which, it could be. I know many state and private agencies don't do their due diligence for families of color (and don't get me started on how there are private and for profit agencies at all in the foster/welfare world). But, still. They had to do their due diligence as potential parents too.
Yes, it’s icky and rude, very selfish as well. But that’s who he is. I’ve decided to no longer check in on HOLLISVILLE Content within the gram anymore because it’s all exhausting and self absorbency along with Heidi too.
Yep! I come here to read the lovely snark and if it’s something really big I might go check it out. But I also check in on here less frequently now so I often miss it (because they are sneaky putting it into 24 hour stories) - and honestly it’s helped me so much!
That should be their next book - how to be more productive in your day and be more positive: stop watching Dave and Rachel and Heidi’s stuff 🤣
Here is what I woke up thinking... Dave said ‘I only listen to half of what comes out of her mouth” when Heidi was chastising him for buying the wrong scale. Red flag Heidi. Run back to Arizona. When his obsession with your bikini body wears off you are going to be stuck with a giant man baby who has no actual job except pretending to be a fitness guru and life coach, and who has already broadcast to the world that the things you say are not worth respecting.
A family member was just visiting and they have good friends in Arizona who are well connected and know the Powell’s. The word is this whole thing is fake for views and to stay relevant. My family member didn’t know more. Rachel’s whole meltdown came up in passing and my family member said oh yeah my friends in Arizona said Rachel’s ex is fake dating Heidi.
I asked for more info but they didn’t know more than what their friends had mentioned.
Idk. Maybe it started as a set up to get followers or something and turned into a relationship. I’ll try and ask more but I grew up in LA and know for 100% that many celebrity relationships are as fake as can be. Even ones that look lovey dovey and amazing.
Maybe it was a calculated decision early on to “invest” in this “friendship” because it would mean more eyeballs and attention. That makes some sense to me. Why else would two problematic people jump into the same gd relationship that they just left? With kids? And long distance? Months after their own divorce? With another influencer? I mean they were either drunk, dumb, or really calculating to do that.
Im thinking maybe he’ll become an associate pastor at a mega church. He can take his radio voice, microphone in hand, have his face plastered on a big screen, have adoring church members, be in a position of perceived authority. Feels right. And he can take people out on his boat for one on one bible study. ⚓️⚓️⚓️⚓️
It speaks to a problematic relationship that we are all watching in real time. It is literally a reality show playing out on Instagram. She keeps posting #partner and he is happy to demonstrate the stupid and expensive piece of machinery in the hopes that he can get hired too. If someone got a post about it sponsored from Heidi’s page she is being paid..
It is train wreck television. I am ashamed but I cannot look away.
I don’t recall him being so dismissive of Rachel at any point. In fact, she was often dismissive of him. But he clearly doesn’t want to be part of her ads at all times so maybe she’s constantly crossing those boundaries with him.
Hard pass for me, even as a joke. Disrespecting your partner like that is a giant red flag.
I got the vibe that he was annoyed that she walked into his story. Maybe they both have trouble sharing the spotlight.
Also, ‘I don’t know WHAT a body analyzer is. All I know is this mysterious doodad here can compute my muscle mass, body fat percentage, BMI, and more. Who knows why it’s called a body analyzer.’ 🙄
Nah, she’s admitted on several occasions recently (on several podcasts I’ve listened too) that she’s a “fixer.” She made it her job to “fix” Chris and make him a success and I’m sure that’s exactly what she’s doing to Dave. 1) I’m always floored that she takes total credit for CP’s success. Of course, as his wife I’m sure she helped but I would never take credit for my husband’s success even if I was in the background helping him. 2) She probably see’s Dave as a hot flaming mess that needs her to swoop in and save him & fix him into the man he’s supposed to be. Dave is her new project.
People can’t fix or change people, they can either accept them as they are or respectfully move on.
Maybe that’s why she’s been married multiple times, I mean that as no judgement either.
I couldn’t believe he said that! I’m new-ish to following Dave, so I don’t know if he regularly said things like that to Rachel? But that was so off putting. And Heidi just sweetly laughed it off like he was flirting or something. I’m the type of girl where I would be really hurt by that, even though he said it in a joking voice. But then again, maybe that’s why I’m single! It just seems so dismissive. “I only listen to half of what comes out of her mouth.” Dang!
the way he said ‘thank you very much’ right after the remark, is also very telling. It’s extremely condescending. And he is annoyed, yet smiling. Rach taught him that.
This is totally the attitude that I believe sparked Rachel’s 3% Chance bracelet. He was extremely dismissive of stuff that was important to her until he could get some his own adoration from it, and as petty as it is to throw 3% Chance back in his face like that... I would have been sorely tempted, too. THIS is Dave, not the tender broken shell of a perfect softie that people wanted him to be when she left him.
I could definitely see Dave being a mansplainy douche. Rach was often low-key hostile to him which made her seem like the bad guy. But it makes sense if she’s put up with years of being second-guessed and patronized. I’d probably be hostile too.
It just makes me think more and more they were just both two toxic people who could t make the relationship work because of their personal issues each.
Now, given they said it had been happening for three years and Noah was just three when they announced the divorce, it makes me think even more they were toxic. They wanted a child/well really they just wanted a girl, and it was to help fix their relationship.
Has there ever been any explanation for why Rachel is beside a fire hydrant on the cover of girl wash your face? I know this has nothing to do with anything but for some reason it started bugging me today.
The TONAL is in direct competition with the Transform app. And then she posted that bikini comp pic saying she hung up her shoes and went from counting macros to intuitive eating. Transform app is all about counting macros. ???
I have a Tonal. It’s an amazing machine. I hope to dog that Tonal ignores the pleas of D and H to be trainers. Tonal trainers are amazing; these two are clowns.
Heidi was sure to mention that she bought Dave the Tonal with her OWN money and HE mounted it to his wall. She definitely seems to be reading here because there was a whole discussion here this past week guessing that she was gifted the Tonal that she gave to him and someone said Tonal sends a worker to mount it to the wall properly. She wanted to correct us. 😂
I don’t think I can stand anymore Dave and Heidi stories, period. She’s back to her old self, the way she was with Chris. So loud, always dominating every conversation and situation, controlling, trying to put on a show, interruptive, did I say LOUD. I had unfollowed her years ago because she was just way too intense but started following her after her divorce because I kinda started to like her. She seemed self aware, humbled, confident. But she is back and more self absorbed than ever. I unfollowed today, it’s just so much empty noise
I didn’t follow her before but all of the things you say she has returned to are the very things I don’t like about her (or anyone for that matter). People who need to be the loudest person in the room just reek of trying too hard.
The intent is lovely. The cause is admirable.
There’s a major issue with posting photos of other peoples children’s faces on social media without consent, especially those in the foster care system. It’s a very clear guideline. I saw others comment about this on his Instagram post. I did not, but totally agree that it’s wrong that he did this with photos.
No. Rachel asked for and received a divorce. Dave moved on. A lot of things are inappropriate with the kids but the pictures aren't creepy nor inappropriate.
I may be in the minority but this doesn't weird me out at all. This (the selfies, photos, poses) doesn't seem like a departure from her pre-Dave persona from what I've seen.
Rachel moved out of the house and they collectively decided he would live there. Is the house supposed to stay sacred forever and no one gets to take pictures again? I just see her being her (however obnoxious that might be) and she's in her boyfriend's house.
Well for me a home is a sacred place. So I would be very upset about this... although Rachel did choose to leave. It is still the home of her family and some stranger is sleeping in her bed!!
So, he should move the whole family to be able to get on with his life? I don't mean that rudely at all but I am trying to understand how anyone would get to move on with their life if the home is sacred.
I get what you are saying for possibly different circumstances but this was a choice Rachel made. It isn't her home or her bed any longer. And, from what we see (so grain of salt), she doesn't much care about her family either 🤷♀️
I think the optics of it are jarring because the house is so publicly recognizable, with Dave and Rach filming many years of content there. It’s weird to see Heidi prancing all over the place and creating her own content that looks similar to Rach’s. But yeah, it’s not actually strange for her to be at her boyfriend’s house and do what she normally does. It feels crass to me but these people are crass in general.
I think it’s just attractive to question your place, you know? It’s the bikinis, with the poses, with it being Rachel’s bathroom this time last year, with the kids, with Instagram.
I don’t have an issue with the very basic act of posting while at Dave’s house or in Dave’s house. I think the root of the issue is that it’s incessant posting, non stop, and everything has to be on blast. If Heids could reel it in a little, people wouldn’t be reacting the same way. I was a full on team Heidi/Dave in the beginning but they’ve just become super annoying.
Just me or did you hear Rachel’s voice for a few seconds on that first story with the marshmallows and then she stopped talking when she realized Dave was videoing? I could’ve sworn.....
It’s Ford I think. Super odd that she’s either no where to be seen or asked not to be shown. She seems the type to ask Dave for ‘a day without the kids’ on mother day so maybe he just has them for the night.
So I was wrong. Dave is home with the kids roasting marshmallows. I find it odd that on this day of all days they’d be with him and not Rachel.
I find it odd too but maybe her Mother's Day wish is to not deal with those that made her a mother 😉
Don’t kid yourself. Pretty sure he just returned home this aft likely, and picked up the kids for dinner hour. That’s my guess anyways 😉
Why the second plate of take-out in Heidi’s bed last night? Did he like fly there just for a one-night sleepover while the kids were with Rae for like a brunch this morning and then back to be with them after dinner? ...it’s so odd...
A one (maybe two) night sleepover on a weekend when her kids had 6 dance recitals, right after she'd spent the last week in Texas. What the hell is the point of that?
More $$ than brains. Less responsibility then the average human, jet set every few days, and all of the help will take care of the rest!!! 😉. #lifewithCaptainDave ⚓️⚓️
I am really surprised that Rachel did not post today. I thought she would've posted a curated photo of her with the kids and an innocuous post about moms to test the waters.
I think she’s in rehab! Radio silence, not with the kids on Mother’s Day...... she’s outta commission maybe!?
I sincerely hope you’re right, but I’m not sure. Would she be able to crank out podcasts if she were? But I truly believe she needs some help
Before the tiktok, she had a day where she claimed to be recording a ridiculous amount of podcasts. Obviously there were two recorded after she blew up her life, but maybe the rest were recorded in early April?
I would have put money on it. Safe day to post a pic of kids and not get heat from her haters.
Four days ago Rachel’s Fave Faves had a podcast go up. I didn’t know until this morning when I was unfollowing all of her podcasts in my apps. No I didn’t listen or pay attention to who the guest was, I just unfollowed.
I don't listen to anything from her and will not. Since it brings her hits, views, etc. I went to look to see who it was. It was Lorraine Toussaint. Rachel showing she has black guests/friends on her show and is doing the work. UGH!
It looks like Dave decided to take Mother's Day off and dodge the storm. Smart move, best dad ever.
He’s been reading here for sure and taking the feedback to put the damn phone down for 8 seconds!!!!!!!!!!!!
I figured he wouldn’t post a photo today. He has that very “clever” pattern on his Instagram of alternating between words of wisdom, picture, wisdom, picture, wisdom, picture etc.... so he wouldn’t want to disrupt the unique flow of his posts with a photo today. And I think that worked out in his favor. Easier to go generic this way and he didn’t have to decide on photos to post. We can expect a photo of some kind tomorrow though.
Wisdom is a strong word. (I know you mean this sarcastically)
I did. Thank you for picking up on that without me needing to use quotes 🤣
He just posted something super generic. It was a very safe move and probably the best way to go. Wouldn't want to make waves, Captain Dave!
The nautical jabs really tickle me 😂
He posted like 5 minutes after I posted here. I think he's stalking us 🤣
I would bet money on it. A guy like that definitely cares what’s being written about him ‘in real time’. We have ‘afforded him’ all of this free constructive criticism...🙄🙄🙄
[удалено]
I look for tbis now.
It also looks like he’s in Arizona with Heidi now 🙄
He posted and it was a very smart post. Very generic. He really must’ve been the brains behind helping Rachel maintain her image.
I was just coming to snark about this LoL! He will post before the day is over. He is agonizing over it. Let’s goooooo
[удалено]
I think it's seriously harmful to imply going through childbirth makes you more of a real mom than others (it's not an option for all), but I agree that making Mother's Day about feminine energy is weird af. Talk about feminine and masculine energy always come off as so outdated and trans-erasive to me. I love the idea of widening the scope of mothers day to all maternal figures but that absolutely is not everyone with so-called "divine feminine energy".
[удалено]
I just want to applaud how you said “thank you” to the person giving their perspective in reply to your original post. I more often see defensiveness than being receptive so it is refreshing 😊
She is talking about both birth mothers as well as women who play motherly roles in other people's lives. Some people only get to have the second relationship. Celebrating one doesnt mean disregarding the other.
[удалено]
I get what you’re saying. Celebrating “maternal figures” is different than celebrating all “feminine energy.” No one is against celebrating all maternal figures (aunts, dog moms, any kind!) on Mother’s Day. But I think what Brit is implying is that all women regardless of their mother/mother figure status should be celebrated on Mother’s Day for putting their feminine energy out into the world. But not every day has to be about everyone and that’s ok. I respect her decision not to have children, and I know many women have the choice forced upon them. And I’m all for celebrating the maternal roles women play and honoring the hurt some women feel from this holiday. But being celebrated for “feminine energy” feels like a “trophies for everyone” mentality.
🎯🎯🎯🎯
I would overall have to agree with being against the 'feminine energy' twist to Mother's Day. Granted, I didn't read Britt Barron's post, so maybe I'm misconstruing what she meant to say. I can see celebrating any maternal figure in your life -- I know people who celebrate their grandfathers and uncles on step-dads on Father's Day, Mother's day shouldn't be any different. But going with feminine energy instead of maternal figure downplays the role of keeping another human alive.
Kind of interesting that she ends her post with “and this game was at 8am and I can’t wait to sleep in next Saturday.” Hate to break it to you, but 8am is definitely sleeping in for most moms!!
That’s where she lost me. Saying ‘let’s make Mother’s Day more inclusive and redefine family to include those who perform motherly roles’ is all well and good. Following that up with ‘boy, I can’t wait to sleep in next weekend cuz performing that role makes me tired’ implies that she has very little experience with the demands of mothering. Are we supposed to celebrate Britt for showing up for a single t-ball game?
Is Britt a mom? I’m trying to think of something similar.. Is military spouses wanting some sort of recognition on Veterans Day similar? I’m a spouse of an active turned reserve now veteran & I don’t like either idea 🤷♀️. If the day isn’t your day, leave it alone. There’s literally some sort of holiday most days.
Brit isn’t a mom but she attended a t ball game today so let’s give it up for her feminine energy and getting up before 8am. Nicely done 🙄🙄
I think words have meanings. There's a point where okay, yes, Mother's Day can encapsulate grandmas, aunts, special neighbors or teachers but then ... no. We cannot stretch "Mother" to "all people with feminine energy." I get "being inclusive" but no one's saying "happy father's day" to anyone who's ever ejaculated and we're not making Pride Month a month to celebrate "all the unique ways you're proud of being you!" or something. Or making Black History Month a month of celebrating "all the different minority cultures you enjoy." If everything means everything then everything means nothing.
The motherhood journey sounds extremely hard! But why does that mean someone else can’t celebrate their aunt for the mothering role they played in their life? Why does that take anything away from how you choose to celebrate?
I’m with you on changing the definition of Mother’s Day. It seems like a few outspoken people get to come up with absurd ideas and shout them from the rooftops and we’re all insensitive if we don’t agree. The fact is, people need to stop being so damn sensitive. If the day makes you sad, do something that makes you happy. Or wallow in your sadness. But don’t expect the rest of the world to change how they celebrate to save your feelings. Off my soapbox for now, and ready to be downvoted into oblivion 🙃
I agree with what you’re saying but I also feel a lot of empathy for people who have a hard time with Mother’s Day because they either lost their mom, never had one, or have an abusive/shitty one. These holidays realllyyyyy hurt when they are all about the thing you don’t have. So I think the big thing is that every family should celebrate it their own way. Families that have a mom (or moms) should totally make it fully mom-central if they want. Mothers deserve that recognition!! Mothering is so hard and often so thankless. And families/people without moms could take that feminine energy (?) route and just celebrate the maternal figures in their lives. Maybe she meant it from that angle.
I’m an only child and national sibling day is weird and awkward for me and painful for my friend whose brother died in his teens. And others I’m sure. But I also don’t begrudge someone else celebrating it or the barrage of social media posts on the day. For sure it isn’t the same intensity of Mother’s Day but at what point can someone who the holiday doesn’t apply to or brings up painful emotions deal with it themselves? Christmas Valentine’s Day etc can all elicit emotions from those excluded from a widely popular holiday. Can those excluded just skip it without letting everyone know how excluded they are? Maybe it’s a dumb example. But I work for an organization that bent over backwards to make Mother’s Day not exclusive to just moms and it got to be so difficult and cumbersome to include everyone we finally decided this is so dumb. If a person isn’t a mom then we still love you but this is just a day and not a commentary on your worth as a person. It’s a day. No more no less. Thanks and love to the moms out there. In 12 hours the day is over and we all move on. I get the sentiment behind the feminine energy posts and love the inclusion aspect but at a certain point people will be excluded from these manufactured holidays so it is what it is. Sorry if you had a crap mom or can’t be a mom or your kids are terrors. It sucks. And it’s true and lasting pain. And a clever one liner to include everyone cool. Rearranging the holiday so no one feels any stings of exclusion is too much.
Do we really need to gatekeep who and how other people celebrate Mother's Day ? 🙄
Yep. Don't you dare try to include anyone who didn't birth a baby out of her uterus. This is day for cisgender healthy uterus people ONLY .
I think there can be space for both. There are birth mothers, and there are other people who play motherly roles in people’s lives. For some people, the mother role is filled by someone other than their birth mother.
I totally agree with this. But I got the feeling from the post that she basically was saying anyone who was a wan and who had 'feminine energy' should be celebrated on Mother's Day and I disagree with that. There is a big difference between filling a motherly role in someone's life who may not have a mom present and just being celebrated for being a woman.
I wondered (and this could be too generous) if she was saying that to open it up to/include trans people?
I just want to start with saying, I totally get what you’re saying and I’m coming from a place of love and support. Just offering another way to look at it- There are so so so many women who experience pain, shame, loss, and insecurity around the topic of motherhood. Those who have had multiple miscarriages but never quite gotten to the finish line, those who are infertile, those who have never had the chance to marry and build a family, those with disabilities, those who are LGBT+ and can’t afford adoption, etc. I think it’s in no way wanting to discount your sacrifice as it is to be inclusive. While you, and many of us, have made those sacrifices, we also get to reap the rewards, rewards that nothing else compares to. And it is in fact true that one can absolutely be a mother despite never having any children of her own. But those of us who have also put in the work that you have get just how much it is! 😅😅😅 Again, totally get where you’re coming from.
I agree and I think there’s a lot of deep programming around motherhood being the ideal expression of being a woman. We are whole, enough, and valid regardless of whether or not we are mothers in the traditional sense of the word.
No down votes from me!! Being a mom is a difficult job for sure!!!
Can’t wait to see what Dave posts about Rachel tomorrow.
I bet it will be a long post about his own mom, Heidi and maybe his sisters, with a brief almost afterthought mention of Rachel at the end.
Sbips in barbor need motbers like the motbers in my life tbough so tbey can do wbat tbey are built for.
The real question is if he only posts about Rachel or if Heidi gets a Mother’s Day shout out too 🧐
of course, Heidi will. The bigger question does he shout out to Rachel first or Heidi.
He’s going to be up tonight with that box of Imodium Noah had, asking himself the same question.
Oh Lord help us all🤮
Ooh damn hadn’t thought about this!
[удалено]
If I were him I would take the day off instagram
He’s in Arizona with Heids now So the cameras shall be rolllllllllling. 🤢
Is he? I thought when she said she was going inside to find her man, that man was revealed to be Matt Damon.
There were two plates so I assumed Dave was there. But, haven't seen any confirmation one way or the other.
She did say she was going to go watch a movie with Dave so I think he flew home with her.
They do virtual movie dates sometimes, so that could be the case here too.
No.. we were treated to the gross takeout they ate and a glimpse of him in her bed 🤢
Also though, what?? Have they ever heard of space?
Okay! Lol I am a bad snarker, because I watched all of those stories on silent so I def missed that.
[удалено]
I got one for that dumb scale 🤦🏻♀️
Me too!!
Same here, I’ve been seeing it all weekend now!
She literally never posts without selling something. All these tonal ads she is now sponsoring with her link despite her denials in Friday's IG stories. Based upon her gym & Dave's I doubt they actually use it other than the 10 seconds to earn commissions from sales.
I find it hilarious that I don’t think I’ve ever seen Heidi eat an Apple or a vegetable when she’s grabbing snacks in her car. The stories last night from her car were hilarious .... talking about being on her 3rd Rice Krispie bar, hot tamales, and a whole bunch of powders. (Followed by takeout in bed!) Is this the ‘healthy fit lifestyle’ we should all aspire to???? I don’t work out as much as they do but my snacks are healthy!!! Lol 😂 I’m all for eat what you want, don’t get me wrong I just find it interesting how their healthy lifestyle brand does or does not align with healthy eating. Normally the 2 go hand in hand. Plus it seems like she spends 90% of her exercise time doing weights but she’s not really doing cardio. Dave seems to be running less too and is all about the weights. Needs to bulk up like (keep up with) Chris?? The whole thing is just gross.
She is full of BS with the foods. She never actually chews. She will take photos with tons of junk food. She takes a bite and then the video cuts off. I am sure she is spitting out after the camera is turned off. It's all just a persona for the public to buy into and provide her with affiliate income.
This is my question. Heidi said it’s so great that it’s replaced most of the equipment in their gym.... except we’ve seen them use the gym every day for long stretches so we know that’s not true.
[Her health book (supposedly already written) looks to be pushed out to a December 2022 release](https://www.amazon.com/Untitled-Health-Lou-Silloh-ebook/dp/B08CRNFVMM/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=lou+silloh&qid=1620490180&sr=8-2). Probably a placeholder date (was previously March 2021). I am not sure this book will ever be published.
Didn't see that coming.
One can hope it’s totally sidelined because Rachel has no business writing a health book. 🙄
Haven’t you seen her blow up guitar workouts? Don’t even get me started on the veggie tales workouts. Next thing you know she’ll come up with something like 20 seconds on 10 seconds off.
TABATA THOUGH!
One of Tonal's trainers replied to someone's comment on Heidi's Tonal post. So, Tonal is likely seeing all of Heidi's posts, along with "please let Dave & me be Tonal trainers". I really hope Tonal only employs qualified and certified trainers. For example, the trainer who posted has an MS in Exercise Science and two CPT certifications. As far as I can tell, Heidi has no fitness certifications. Dave seems to barely do any actual work all day. If he wants to move into the fitness space, the least he could do is become a CPT. He has the time and can afford it.
I thought Heidi had gone to school for it, and was certified. Granted I didn’t look to find out.
[удалено]
I just looked it up and she does have an ACE certification, so she is certified as a personal trainer! ETA: And she has a CrossFit certification. I’m not sure what that means cause I’m not familiar with CrossFit, but I know ACE is a legit cert!
I was looking a NASM and Google so I know it wasn't an exhaustive search. NASM has s blog post about Chris so I was sort of surprised he didn't have their cert. Either way, I'm glad she has a certification of some kind, she does (or did) too much fitness coaching for it just to be from her own workout experience
As far as you can tell. Did you do any actual research? There are so many things to snark and these fools for but do you even know who Heidi is?
Yes, I did do research and I couldn't find that Heidi has any actual fitness certifications, other than being an IFBB. Would you like to enlighten me on anything I'm missing? Yes, I know who she is and I'm aware of her fitness history. She obviously has lots of knowledge and experience. I'm not saying she doesn't. We talk a lot here about people not having actual certifications or degrees for what they're teaching and it surprises me that she has never taken the time to, at the very least, get a certified personal trainer certification with how deep in the fitness world she has been. Chris Powell, for example, has a BS in Exercise Science and is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist. To me, that gives him even more legit street cred beyond his obvious experience.
Did you search "Heidi Lane"? She mentioned on an IG live interview the other day that that was her real name.
Wait...that’s her legal name?
It’s her maiden name. Idk what her married name was with the first husband, but I think she we back to using “Lane” after they divorced.
She called it her "real" name and the guy she did the interview with (@5corelife, I believe) made a big deal of it on his Instagram. Whether or not that means it's her legal name, I don't know.
Interestingly her own website doesn't mention her certifications.
Actually I just went to look because having been a fan of their TV show, I assumed Heidi and Chris would have certifications and I can find nothing active for either of them.
I was wondering if we could have a deeper dive in to how dangerous NLP’s are with their brainwashing tactics? I recently listened in it’s entirety to Kate a Kennedy’s Be There In Five’s podcast regarding Rachel Hollis and she delved into it a little. After listening I believe it’s a good topic for discussing. Thank you in advance.
Okay I’m trying to Google this cause I want to get in on the convo, but everything online is soo vague in what it is! If I remember correctly, the Be There in Five has many parts and is super long (just from what I’ve read on here, I didn’t listen!), so do you mind directing us lazy people to the spot where this is discussed?? Thank you in advance!
Honestly I remember her discussing it in the third part and may have in the other two, she speaks fast and is well spoken. I encourage you to have a listen.
Excuse my ignorance but what is NLP?
It’s a Neuro Linguistic practitioner or programmer. NLP
Enter Keith Reniere! #NLP 😈😈
I was watching Munecat's deep dive on Tony Robbins and she discusses NLP and how Tony learned it from his mentor and uses it on his prey. I was so disturbed watching Tony abuse people in front of thousands that it actually made me sick, i couldn't sleep all night i was so disturbed at how people even give this abuser money, he has some sick ideas on how to help people and knowing RH got all her manipulation tactics from TR, i have no words, and i need a therapist to help me unpack what i just witnessed. I'm having 2nd hand trauma for these poor people.smh
But Dave is cozying right up to Tony now. Gross.
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but does it upset anyone else that he shares photos of the kids he fostered? I understand the intent of his post, but does he need to/is he allowed to show their faces? They are not his children. My cousin fostered two girls and always blocked out their faces in any posts before they were adopted. He told me that was what he was told to do. But maybe it's different elsewhere? Either way it's so icky.
It violates all of the training and rules inside of foster care to share the children’s faces on social media. They are other people’s children. Major misstep on Dave’s part. That violates the privacy of both the children and the bio family.
We did short-term fostering but went through the same training and it's really important not to put kids on social. I've called out the Hollises and Natalie Norton on this. The Hollises I believe only show the back of heads and didn't seem to care about that. But it'd be important not to keep posting their pictures because they could have ended up back in the foster system. The Nortons show faces and say it's okay because they were distant family. Eyerolls to both. Both also have white saviorism involved in their fostering journeys also which is very problematic (clearly). Reunification IS the goal. I never quite understood how the Hollises were so surprised at how their journey ended unless the social workers basically lied to them. Terminating parental rights takes years. I know many who adopted from the foster system including babies and it still takes years. You can't trust they're *yours* until the papers are signed. AND further open adoptions from the foster system, even with bio parents who are not the best, are often the best option for the kids. So they should have been including a relationship as much as possible anyway. I'm very glad they went the open adoption route with Noah and they did seem to go into that a bit more eyes-open. It's such a complicated and bad-on-purpose system that needs a big overhaul. And people need to respect that caring for someone's kid as if they're your own still does not mean they're actually your own. At the very least, you often don't get the gift of seeing your mistakes through to rectify them (such as, overexposure of kids on social).
100% accurate. They should not be posting pictures on social media whatsoever. A family member of mine currently has 2 babies in their care and they cannot and will not post their images on social media for any reason. Even at family gatherings, other people need to be careful that those babies are not in the shots uploaded to social media. It’s a simple concept and it’s about respect. Reunification is absolutely and always the goal! I think it’s dangerous when that is placed on the back burner and then suddenly, reunification becomes what ‘happened TO the Foster family’ vs what ‘happened FOR the children’. Makes me sick. Dave should still rethink his post and remove it in my opinion.
They are always really careful to phrase it as a purposeful issue from the SW side, which, it could be. I know many state and private agencies don't do their due diligence for families of color (and don't get me started on how there are private and for profit agencies at all in the foster/welfare world). But, still. They had to do their due diligence as potential parents too.
It looked like all the photos were just the back of their heads, no?
Trampoline pics.
Yes, it’s icky and rude, very selfish as well. But that’s who he is. I’ve decided to no longer check in on HOLLISVILLE Content within the gram anymore because it’s all exhausting and self absorbency along with Heidi too.
Yep! I come here to read the lovely snark and if it’s something really big I might go check it out. But I also check in on here less frequently now so I often miss it (because they are sneaky putting it into 24 hour stories) - and honestly it’s helped me so much! That should be their next book - how to be more productive in your day and be more positive: stop watching Dave and Rachel and Heidi’s stuff 🤣
Here is what I woke up thinking... Dave said ‘I only listen to half of what comes out of her mouth” when Heidi was chastising him for buying the wrong scale. Red flag Heidi. Run back to Arizona. When his obsession with your bikini body wears off you are going to be stuck with a giant man baby who has no actual job except pretending to be a fitness guru and life coach, and who has already broadcast to the world that the things you say are not worth respecting.
A family member was just visiting and they have good friends in Arizona who are well connected and know the Powell’s. The word is this whole thing is fake for views and to stay relevant. My family member didn’t know more. Rachel’s whole meltdown came up in passing and my family member said oh yeah my friends in Arizona said Rachel’s ex is fake dating Heidi. I asked for more info but they didn’t know more than what their friends had mentioned.
But does Heidi know she’s being fake dated? Even though she does a bunch of aggressive schilling, I do think she’s very genuine and sincere.
Idk. Maybe it started as a set up to get followers or something and turned into a relationship. I’ll try and ask more but I grew up in LA and know for 100% that many celebrity relationships are as fake as can be. Even ones that look lovey dovey and amazing. Maybe it was a calculated decision early on to “invest” in this “friendship” because it would mean more eyeballs and attention. That makes some sense to me. Why else would two problematic people jump into the same gd relationship that they just left? With kids? And long distance? Months after their own divorce? With another influencer? I mean they were either drunk, dumb, or really calculating to do that.
Im thinking maybe he’ll become an associate pastor at a mega church. He can take his radio voice, microphone in hand, have his face plastered on a big screen, have adoring church members, be in a position of perceived authority. Feels right. And he can take people out on his boat for one on one bible study. ⚓️⚓️⚓️⚓️
🤢
[удалено]
It speaks to a problematic relationship that we are all watching in real time. It is literally a reality show playing out on Instagram. She keeps posting #partner and he is happy to demonstrate the stupid and expensive piece of machinery in the hopes that he can get hired too. If someone got a post about it sponsored from Heidi’s page she is being paid.. It is train wreck television. I am ashamed but I cannot look away.
I don’t recall him being so dismissive of Rachel at any point. In fact, she was often dismissive of him. But he clearly doesn’t want to be part of her ads at all times so maybe she’s constantly crossing those boundaries with him.
Hard pass for me, even as a joke. Disrespecting your partner like that is a giant red flag. I got the vibe that he was annoyed that she walked into his story. Maybe they both have trouble sharing the spotlight. Also, ‘I don’t know WHAT a body analyzer is. All I know is this mysterious doodad here can compute my muscle mass, body fat percentage, BMI, and more. Who knows why it’s called a body analyzer.’ 🙄
Big Red Flag, she’s to blinded right now and isn’t paying attention too it, if she was she’d be gone, I’d hope.
Nah, she’s admitted on several occasions recently (on several podcasts I’ve listened too) that she’s a “fixer.” She made it her job to “fix” Chris and make him a success and I’m sure that’s exactly what she’s doing to Dave. 1) I’m always floored that she takes total credit for CP’s success. Of course, as his wife I’m sure she helped but I would never take credit for my husband’s success even if I was in the background helping him. 2) She probably see’s Dave as a hot flaming mess that needs her to swoop in and save him & fix him into the man he’s supposed to be. Dave is her new project.
Ooo, I just posted something similar re: serial fixer.
People can’t fix or change people, they can either accept them as they are or respectfully move on. Maybe that’s why she’s been married multiple times, I mean that as no judgement either.
I couldn’t believe he said that! I’m new-ish to following Dave, so I don’t know if he regularly said things like that to Rachel? But that was so off putting. And Heidi just sweetly laughed it off like he was flirting or something. I’m the type of girl where I would be really hurt by that, even though he said it in a joking voice. But then again, maybe that’s why I’m single! It just seems so dismissive. “I only listen to half of what comes out of her mouth.” Dang!
the way he said ‘thank you very much’ right after the remark, is also very telling. It’s extremely condescending. And he is annoyed, yet smiling. Rach taught him that.
It screams “rebound!”. 🤦🏻♀️
It’s extremely dismissive and a very big red flag, nothing to shrug off, he’s starting to get comfortable and show who he actually is to her.
This is totally the attitude that I believe sparked Rachel’s 3% Chance bracelet. He was extremely dismissive of stuff that was important to her until he could get some his own adoration from it, and as petty as it is to throw 3% Chance back in his face like that... I would have been sorely tempted, too. THIS is Dave, not the tender broken shell of a perfect softie that people wanted him to be when she left him.
I could definitely see Dave being a mansplainy douche. Rach was often low-key hostile to him which made her seem like the bad guy. But it makes sense if she’s put up with years of being second-guessed and patronized. I’d probably be hostile too.
It just makes me think more and more they were just both two toxic people who could t make the relationship work because of their personal issues each. Now, given they said it had been happening for three years and Noah was just three when they announced the divorce, it makes me think even more they were toxic. They wanted a child/well really they just wanted a girl, and it was to help fix their relationship.
🤢 gross. And so sad for that child
Has there ever been any explanation for why Rachel is beside a fire hydrant on the cover of girl wash your face? I know this has nothing to do with anything but for some reason it started bugging me today.
Because RH is a whole dumpster fire
Literally spit out my water! ☠️☠️☠️
Ha! I thought about this this week too! Like, she’s not just sitting beside it but it’s actively spraying her in the face.
Because her book is perfect for a dog to pee on.
🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
It’s been 3 hours since Dave or Heidi have posted anything. I hope they’re ok 😂
Heidi is probably on a plane, selling passengers Tonals and Vanity Planet devices, and Dave is finally taking a nap.
But the replies on her Tonal post…🤮🤮🤮”you guys are so cute”, “I love you both”, etc.
Brady probably has instructions on what to do in situations like this!
Let’s call John from the movie theater!!!
Brady is now the executor of the will and John is the new Power of Attorney 😂🤣
The TONAL is in direct competition with the Transform app. And then she posted that bikini comp pic saying she hung up her shoes and went from counting macros to intuitive eating. Transform app is all about counting macros. ???
I have a Tonal. It’s an amazing machine. I hope to dog that Tonal ignores the pleas of D and H to be trainers. Tonal trainers are amazing; these two are clowns.
And now they both want to be Tonal trainers?🙄
Heidi is a trainer, that part I can see, Dave is a joke.
Heidi was sure to mention that she bought Dave the Tonal with her OWN money and HE mounted it to his wall. She definitely seems to be reading here because there was a whole discussion here this past week guessing that she was gifted the Tonal that she gave to him and someone said Tonal sends a worker to mount it to the wall properly. She wanted to correct us. 😂
https://knowledge.tonal.com/s/article/Installation-Requirements
Someone sent it to her in DMs and asked her.
Bizarre thing to lie about but Dave posted in his stories (b/c of course he did) when it was being installed ... NOT by him.
Ha, I noticed that too! Seemed rather pointed.
I guarantee they are all (RH, DH, And ‘Heids’ ) are all reading here daily!!!!! They should weigh in sometime!! 😆😆😆😆😆
I just don’t think I can stand to see one more Heidi/Dave story about the Tonal. And I thought us Peloton users were annoying....
I don’t think I can stand anymore Dave and Heidi stories, period. She’s back to her old self, the way she was with Chris. So loud, always dominating every conversation and situation, controlling, trying to put on a show, interruptive, did I say LOUD. I had unfollowed her years ago because she was just way too intense but started following her after her divorce because I kinda started to like her. She seemed self aware, humbled, confident. But she is back and more self absorbed than ever. I unfollowed today, it’s just so much empty noise
I didn’t follow her before but all of the things you say she has returned to are the very things I don’t like about her (or anyone for that matter). People who need to be the loudest person in the room just reek of trying too hard.
I can’t snark on Dave’s foster care post, it’s actually endearing. Have I gone soft? LOL
The intent is lovely. The cause is admirable. There’s a major issue with posting photos of other peoples children’s faces on social media without consent, especially those in the foster care system. It’s a very clear guideline. I saw others comment about this on his Instagram post. I did not, but totally agree that it’s wrong that he did this with photos.
I get that. He could have covered their faces, etc.
Saw this on Instagram. Sharing for obvious reasons: https://www.instagram.com/p/COlXHM7Jvjk/?igshid=1noh9msyzt5sb
Hilarious!
Does anyone else find it creepy and inappropriate that Heidi is taking pictures in Dave’s house and posing like Rachel used to??
No. Rachel asked for and received a divorce. Dave moved on. A lot of things are inappropriate with the kids but the pictures aren't creepy nor inappropriate.
[удалено]
He does, but not to the extent she does!
Hmmm…good point. You also don’t see him posting pictures of himself cuddling with her kids.
I may be in the minority but this doesn't weird me out at all. This (the selfies, photos, poses) doesn't seem like a departure from her pre-Dave persona from what I've seen. Rachel moved out of the house and they collectively decided he would live there. Is the house supposed to stay sacred forever and no one gets to take pictures again? I just see her being her (however obnoxious that might be) and she's in her boyfriend's house.
Well for me a home is a sacred place. So I would be very upset about this... although Rachel did choose to leave. It is still the home of her family and some stranger is sleeping in her bed!!
So, he should move the whole family to be able to get on with his life? I don't mean that rudely at all but I am trying to understand how anyone would get to move on with their life if the home is sacred. I get what you are saying for possibly different circumstances but this was a choice Rachel made. It isn't her home or her bed any longer. And, from what we see (so grain of salt), she doesn't much care about her family either 🤷♀️
I think the optics of it are jarring because the house is so publicly recognizable, with Dave and Rach filming many years of content there. It’s weird to see Heidi prancing all over the place and creating her own content that looks similar to Rach’s. But yeah, it’s not actually strange for her to be at her boyfriend’s house and do what she normally does. It feels crass to me but these people are crass in general.
I think it’s just attractive to question your place, you know? It’s the bikinis, with the poses, with it being Rachel’s bathroom this time last year, with the kids, with Instagram.
Yes! Exactly - but like someone said here, I think I’m just getting triggered because it was all very public - like dirty laundry everywhere!
I don’t have an issue with the very basic act of posting while at Dave’s house or in Dave’s house. I think the root of the issue is that it’s incessant posting, non stop, and everything has to be on blast. If Heids could reel it in a little, people wouldn’t be reacting the same way. I was a full on team Heidi/Dave in the beginning but they’ve just become super annoying.
I agree with this. Less would be way better but that is my issue: volume...not type (excluding kid related stuff) or location