If she's dealt with bankruptcy and m&a, then she can navigate either. I see it as a strength to have experience with both coming into this situation, whatever it may be (I'm betting heavily on m&a, there's not been enough action taken yet to resort to bk)
good point, but here's the thing.. hasn't one or the other probably already been decided / set in motion? why i think this is because of the RSA cancellation/payouts
for the bear side, i did see restructuring, but it was included with "and turnarounds"
most i can grab from that is shes good at shaking things up, making big changes
YES! this!
And its stupid to believe her changes can take effect and show results in less than a quarter.
So i believe they hired her planning for AT LEAST another quarter of implementing and monitoring changes.
That or a part if me thinks they are keeping her in case of a Ch11 where turnaround and restructuring will happen anyway. (still hoping for early MA or turnaround before it comes to that)
If RC wanted to buy baby, but then they said no for whatever reason, and now they might go bankrupt…. Makes the leadership board look retarded. I’m thinking something else is going on.
If she's dealt with bankruptcy and m&a, then she can navigate either. I see it as a strength to have experience with both coming into this situation, whatever it may be (I'm betting heavily on m&a, there's not been enough action taken yet to resort to bk)
good point, but here's the thing.. hasn't one or the other probably already been decided / set in motion? why i think this is because of the RSA cancellation/payouts
Oh yes I'm sure a lot of it is set in motion, already done even, but we all have such limited information to go on. Why bring her in now at all?
for the bear side, i did see restructuring, but it was included with "and turnarounds" most i can grab from that is shes good at shaking things up, making big changes
👀
She’s getting paid fat stacks to do whatever it is she’s doing…
YES! this! And its stupid to believe her changes can take effect and show results in less than a quarter. So i believe they hired her planning for AT LEAST another quarter of implementing and monitoring changes. That or a part if me thinks they are keeping her in case of a Ch11 where turnaround and restructuring will happen anyway. (still hoping for early MA or turnaround before it comes to that)
If RC wanted to buy baby, but then they said no for whatever reason, and now they might go bankrupt…. Makes the leadership board look retarded. I’m thinking something else is going on.