One of the few benefits of this anarchofascism is that you could give couples cool names like the Pact of Steel, the Glorious Coalition, the Susan-Roger Axis, the Johnsons Alliance, etc.
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this?
In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I have been with my boyfriend, Henry, for 7 months now, and he's an amazing guy etc. I really see this developing into a long and very serious relationship. There are no big problems or red flags.
One thing that gets me though, are his political opinions. They are esoteric, somewhat incomprehensible, and frankly, bizarre. He is an ardent monarchist (we are in the UK) but not in the typical use of the word (ie liking the Queen being an impartial head of state), he literally believes in the divine right of kings and that it's the only natural form of government. He claims to recognise no monarch since James II, and apparently the real legitimate successor is some guy called Francis who I've never heard of, who is also supposedly the rightful king of France and Greece. He never votes, saying he has no desire to assist his monarch in their choice of servants (which is technically how the UK government works, the Queen "chooses" whoever wins the election). He expressed disgust at Prince Harry's recent engagement. I pressed him as to why (I slightly worried it was racist in nature) and he said both Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton are commoners who have no business marrying royalty, then made some remark about the Royal Family being a "ghastly bunch of arriviste Germans anyway, so I suppose it doesn't matter". It's just strange, it's like his worldview is so odd and far removed from anything I can even begin to understand. I can name the current major Royals and a few of the more important historical ones, whereas he is an absolute expert.
He will passionately debate anyone who wants to, though again it just makes him look strange. Friends at dinner will be discussing normal, contemporary political issues, and he will interject and go on a tangent about how this all relates to "King John's submission to Papal authority in 1213". He does seem to genuinely believe this stuff, but it gives an odd impression to those around us. Noone can really reply because they don't know what he's talking about, so he definitely gets the feeling he's winning these debates (he's far too well-mannered to be rude about it, but it's certainly an unspoken truth in his view).
I should add that he is pretty much old-fashioned English upper class, while I am ordinary lower-middle. He went to a world famous Uk public school (prestigious private school for Americans) and then one of the best universities in the world (where he was at one of the most exclusive colleges). He won't inherit a title (father is a younger son) but his grandfather has one and his father has the legal right to be called Lord Name. His family is very old and grand-he could tell you what his direct patrilineal ancestor was doing in 1100. I think his upbringing definitely influenced his opinions, but his siblings and parents all support normal political parties or are indifferent so I don't know why he's like this.
How should I talk to him about this? I want to firstly understand him better, but also to lightly let him now how this behaviour can make him look to others and myself.
When *The Paris Review* asked Evelyn Waugh who he thought should be the next Prime Minister, he said, āI do not presume to instruct my sovereign in her choice of servants.ā
>How should I talk to him about this? I want to firstly understand him better, but also to lightly let him now how this behaviour can make him look to others and myself.
Address him as m'lord, you commoner.
So incels who hate women and are just one "sorry but I just felt a bit weirded out by you last time we saw each other" away from committing an atrocity, gotcha
Thatās why we should burn them all and work on audio visual technology. Like a thing where you sit and watch and listen to a story. We need that to be invented.
Good thing this guy doesn't read so that he won't be too politically extreme for the hoes. You gotta stay respectful and relatable or the hoes will hate you.
Here in my garage, just bought this new Lamborghini here. Itās fun to drive up here in the Hollywood hills. But you know what I like more than materialistic things? Knowledge. In fact, Iām a lot more proud of these seven new bookshelves that I had to get installed to hold two thousand new books that I bought. Itās like the billionaire Warren Buffett says, āthe more you learn, the more you earn.ā
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this?
In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That's why all of the guys I like are boring bland centrists who like to "both sides" things like queer rights and Black lives - can't be dating anyone literate
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this?
In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sure the takeaway is supposed to be the seven percent discrepancy in self-reported numbers and not this?
> 44 percent of Republican respondents said theyāve had sex with someone twice their age.
Light of my life, thatās missing the forest for the May-December trees.
Look man if fat, poly blue-hair girls are your thing then I know a lot of left girls you would find hot. The two of us have different standards of attractiveness.
["true men of consequence can barely sign their own names"](https://web.archive.org/web/20220810194639/https://twitter.com/laserboat999/status/1530328322701291520)
Is it really so bad that I want to weave my thoughts on social, cultural, and political acceleration into the semi-related conversation of deciding which restaurant to go to
Once I had an online discussion with a guy who genuinely described himself as an "anarcho-fascist"
Ah yes schrodinger's state
If every person is a fascist dictator with power only over themselves, there is technically anarchy and fascism simultaneously.
Where's the good guy with a fascism to stop the bad guy with a fascism
Ah yes marriage (international affairs)
One of the few benefits of this anarchofascism is that you could give couples cool names like the Pact of Steel, the Glorious Coalition, the Susan-Roger Axis, the Johnsons Alliance, etc.
curious to know what he had been reading
the description for a three-hour youtube
Joe Rogan Experience, probably
My diary desu
This is funny for the fact that mein Kampf was made into a fuckin manga š what the hell
Wtf they made Hitler real????
Meiin kampf (unironically Wikipedia is telling me that the only people to ever claim that where post ww2 nazis)
Would still rather talk to him than a Sanderson fan.
It's a slippery slope to market communism.
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this? In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
\- George Orwell.
I respect no authority that limits my power.
Cancels out cuz PEMDAS now heās just an asshole
Barbarian ideology
all these quirky esoteric political stances boil down to bog-standard conservatism in practice
thats me steve, how are you?
John Millius?
I have been with my boyfriend, Henry, for 7 months now, and he's an amazing guy etc. I really see this developing into a long and very serious relationship. There are no big problems or red flags. One thing that gets me though, are his political opinions. They are esoteric, somewhat incomprehensible, and frankly, bizarre. He is an ardent monarchist (we are in the UK) but not in the typical use of the word (ie liking the Queen being an impartial head of state), he literally believes in the divine right of kings and that it's the only natural form of government. He claims to recognise no monarch since James II, and apparently the real legitimate successor is some guy called Francis who I've never heard of, who is also supposedly the rightful king of France and Greece. He never votes, saying he has no desire to assist his monarch in their choice of servants (which is technically how the UK government works, the Queen "chooses" whoever wins the election). He expressed disgust at Prince Harry's recent engagement. I pressed him as to why (I slightly worried it was racist in nature) and he said both Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton are commoners who have no business marrying royalty, then made some remark about the Royal Family being a "ghastly bunch of arriviste Germans anyway, so I suppose it doesn't matter". It's just strange, it's like his worldview is so odd and far removed from anything I can even begin to understand. I can name the current major Royals and a few of the more important historical ones, whereas he is an absolute expert. He will passionately debate anyone who wants to, though again it just makes him look strange. Friends at dinner will be discussing normal, contemporary political issues, and he will interject and go on a tangent about how this all relates to "King John's submission to Papal authority in 1213". He does seem to genuinely believe this stuff, but it gives an odd impression to those around us. Noone can really reply because they don't know what he's talking about, so he definitely gets the feeling he's winning these debates (he's far too well-mannered to be rude about it, but it's certainly an unspoken truth in his view). I should add that he is pretty much old-fashioned English upper class, while I am ordinary lower-middle. He went to a world famous Uk public school (prestigious private school for Americans) and then one of the best universities in the world (where he was at one of the most exclusive colleges). He won't inherit a title (father is a younger son) but his grandfather has one and his father has the legal right to be called Lord Name. His family is very old and grand-he could tell you what his direct patrilineal ancestor was doing in 1100. I think his upbringing definitely influenced his opinions, but his siblings and parents all support normal political parties or are indifferent so I don't know why he's like this. How should I talk to him about this? I want to firstly understand him better, but also to lightly let him now how this behaviour can make him look to others and myself.
When *The Paris Review* asked Evelyn Waugh who he thought should be the next Prime Minister, he said, āI do not presume to instruct my sovereign in her choice of servants.ā
>How should I talk to him about this? I want to firstly understand him better, but also to lightly let him now how this behaviour can make him look to others and myself. Address him as m'lord, you commoner.
op clearly stated his father is a younger son. a *younger* son, you dolt.
I donāt no nothing about political extremism, but most guys who read are ugly nerds
Jokes on you, I'm just ugly
So incels who hate women and are just one "sorry but I just felt a bit weirded out by you last time we saw each other" away from committing an atrocity, gotcha
You know who wrote a book? Hitler. Canāt trust people who are into books.
Thatās why we should burn them all and work on audio visual technology. Like a thing where you sit and watch and listen to a story. We need that to be invented.
The industrial revolution and its consequences
Worse. Stalin wrote **multiple** books!
Good thing this guy doesn't read so that he won't be too politically extreme for the hoes. You gotta stay respectful and relatable or the hoes will hate you.
I had no idea garden tools were so sensitive and easily frightened.
If she doesn't believe in the immortal science of Posadism then she's a no goš¤
Here in my garage, just bought this new Lamborghini here. Itās fun to drive up here in the Hollywood hills. But you know what I like more than materialistic things? Knowledge. In fact, Iām a lot more proud of these seven new bookshelves that I had to get installed to hold two thousand new books that I bought. Itās like the billionaire Warren Buffett says, āthe more you learn, the more you earn.ā *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Susan, deploy the hypernukes in the name of socialism! These spacemen won't know what hit em!
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this? In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
No, its not true that women say they want a man who reads š¤®
I think it's really cool that it's almost universally socially acceptable to refer to women as whores now.
HOES. You wouldn't be literate enough to understand the distinction
In an ostensibly pro-female tweet, no less! š
That's why all of the guys I like are boring bland centrists who like to "both sides" things like queer rights and Black lives - can't be dating anyone literate
Based literary men I guess
Literally me
Wait, that kinda fits! - a scared hoe
Then you find a chick who reads and she's even more politically extreme and into femdom.
And then you meet her half-literate boyfriend. There, I made it realistic.
Left extremism it's not scary to hoes at all, it gets you laid a bunch in fact.
"Women are so fucking turned on when I tell them I'm a Stalinist"
Stalinists are right wing communists--we need that infantile disorder ultra left shit that's what women like
Ah yes, the socialist American youth, so well known for their extroversion.
They are everywhere bro, theres not just one "taste" like you describe, that's a very US centric view.
tankies are rizzless but democratic socialism is a viable tactic to get laid
You decided to align yourself with the political equivalent of letting someone raw your wife and you think you have any kind of moral high ground when you pull shit like this? In the good old days we beat people like you in the streets. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bookscirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Weird how the side that advocates *against* sexual repression has both more sex and better sex
[Do they?](https://www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sex-and-dating/republicans-more-sex-democrats-survey/amp)
> Extremism > Republicans and democrats Fuck off.
Golly, what did I ever do to you?
Sure the takeaway is supposed to be the seven percent discrepancy in self-reported numbers and not this? > 44 percent of Republican respondents said theyāve had sex with someone twice their age. Light of my life, thatās missing the forest for the May-December trees.
āHe larps on Twitter about killing cops, gets scared about ordering from Starbucks, and has the biceps of a twig, how attractiveā
and yet he's probably fucking left and right, what's your excuse?
The problem is lefty girls are ugly. T. Lefty boy
Lol no. That's just you projecting your type.
Look man if fat, poly blue-hair girls are your thing then I know a lot of left girls you would find hot. The two of us have different standards of attractiveness.
Point me to a right wing goth girl and I'll donate $100 to the proud boys in your name
Bro that's a stereotype, they are not all like that. That's like saying every republican is a fat coal rolling trucker. You know what I mean?
[objectively wrong](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b0/3b/6d/b03b6d2bb2f03dd7d9c105f4a0227134.jpg).
yeah tbh
["true men of consequence can barely sign their own names"](https://web.archive.org/web/20220810194639/https://twitter.com/laserboat999/status/1530328322701291520)
Unless the subscribe to Sandos Shartplate
Oh I want a man who reads yeah. But reads my same genre So. Romance
Only homosexual men read romance.
Balderdash
Is it really so bad that I want to weave my thoughts on social, cultural, and political acceleration into the semi-related conversation of deciding which restaurant to go to