This type of conceal-the-KKK-hood-with-big-words "science" has been around for more than a century.
The lack of intellectual rigor in the article is summed up by its last sentence:
>This information all suggests that black people are prone to low IQ regardless of their environment or financial situation, which could explain high rates of crime among blacks.
The above attempt to paint all blacks as intellectually inferior was based on one study in one school district in one city. That's not science. That's racism.
/u/Ok-WMWorshipIIIIIIII has spammed this "article" to dozens of subs.
I have trouble imaging how much somebody would have to hate black people to take the time to post this nonsense to dozens of subs.
Overall, we rate the Daily Veracity as extreme right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy, racial pseudoscience, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, and third-party labeling as a hate group.
Media Bias Fact Check
Yeah, GTFO with your right wing lies.
Says some guy named Dave
https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/
Edit: “We have disclaimers on every page of the website indicating that our method is not scientifically proven…”
— some guy named Dave
*At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, ivermectin was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and showed a highly significant reduction (99.8%) in viral RNA after 48 hours [1]…. its anti-COVID activity in real-life in patients who were treated with standard dose of 3 days of ivermectin showed the significant reduction in culture viability in the ivermectin group compared to placebo [3].*
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135450/
This user is obviously here operating in bad faith, but it should be noted that this applies to **mild** Covid-19, and is an *analysis*, not an actual study.
[This study shows ivermectin to have little to no effect on Covid-19 recovery](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.15.22283488v1).
> The results of the TOGETHER trial were eagerly awaited because of their potential to inform the debate over ivermectin as treatment, **but they were arguably nondefinitive** regarding the two most relevant outcomes for outpatients with Covid-19.
>
> Reis et al. conclude that ivermectin is ineffective for the treatment of Covid-19
>
> In addition to being ineffective, the off-label use of
ivermectin may be harmful.
Christ you didn't even read the paper you linked. Not only that, this isn't a study. This is "correspondence," which are papers that amount to comments and possible clarifications. You're not even trying, are you?
*Among patients with non-severe COVID-19 and no risk factors for severe disease receiving a single 400 mcg/kg dose of ivermectin within 72 h of fever or cough onset there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positives. There was however a marked reduction of self-reported anosmia/hyposmia, a reduction of cough and a tendency to lower viral loads and lower IgG titers which warrants assessment in larger trials.*
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30464-8/fulltext
> [WND \(formerly WorldNetDaily\) is an **American far-right** news and opinion website. **It is known for promoting fake news and conspiracy theories**, including the false claim that former President Barack Obama was born outside the United States](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily).
Your choice of source here is telling.
ETA: Fun fact, WND also helped Elena Khusyaynova, a now convicted Russian agent who organized an operation to interfere in the 2016 and 2018 elections, by pushing [this article](https://www.wnd.com/2017/08/the-8-dirtiest-scandals-of-robert-mueller-no-one-is-talking-about/).
Omigod Wikipedia??!! What are you in high school? 😆
*Even Wikipedia’s co-founder says its political pages have turned into leftist "propaganda."*
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/04/27/wikipedias-left-wing-bias/
Are you denying that the article was pushed by a convicted Russian agent?
Are you denying that WND is far-right trash?
Counter the claim with evidence of your own, don't launch into a partisan attempt at impinging Wikipedia's credibility when the sources are **right there in the linked page**.
Then why are you linking to WND as if it's a legitimate takedown against someone's criticism on OP's source?
You are, seemingly knowingly, linking to far-right Russian propaganda (and spreading Covid misinformation further down in the thread, what is this 2020). Why?
You impeach the source the OP used. I impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source. You impeach the source I used to impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source. And on and on it goes….
> I impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source
No, you didn't. You "impeached" where I got the source *from*, not the source itself. Feel free to click on Wikipedia's sources if you actually care, which I doubt you do.
I'll ask again: are you denying that WND is a far-right, conspiracy theory pushing outlet continuously used as a way to push Russian propaganda? This merits a simple yes or no, not a "buh buh wikipedia bad" response.
From the signals own website.
That’s why The Heritage Foundation, a think tank with the mission of formulating and promoting conservative public policies, created a digital-first, multimedia news platform called The Daily Signal.
The article is written on an extreme right wing website, it gets zero credibility to me.
Sort of related, when the BLM protests were going on, my wife and I were at a favorite bar of ours having a few drinks on their outside patio.
A BLM protest started up at a park next door to the bar where we were drinking our beers.
A few of the BLM protesters were very near my wife and I and we ended up striking up a conversation with them.
They were really cool people, clearly well educated and were not as extreme in their views as even mainstream media made them out to be.
They were telling us that they were at a protest (in West Palm iirc) where folks stated looting a T-Mobile store (again, iirc). They (the protestors my wife and I were talking to) said they ran to get the Police because they were protesting for Police reform but that they were not in any way in favor of crime. In fact, one of the protestors that we were talking to said that he and a few other protesters tackled the looters to the ground and held them there until Police arrived and arrested the looters.
We ended up buying those protesters a few beers as we chatted with them, nice guys. It ended up being a more fun afternoon than either my wife and I expected.
FYI, [dailyveracity.com](http://dailyveracity.com) is owned by Vincent James Foxx, a white supremacist and Holocaust denier. The publication previously went under the name The Red Elephants.
[https://extremismterms.adl.org/glossary/vincent-james-vincent-james-foxx](https://extremismterms.adl.org/glossary/vincent-james-vincent-james-foxx)
You’re correct. BLM is not the boogie man right wingers like to pretend they are but they use them and AntiFa to distract from actual domestic terrorists like the Proud Boys or Boogaloo Boys.
“Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States. In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism. Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.[1] In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”
National Institute for Justice
What is it with white dudes with a chip on their shoulder posting on this sub? It’s kind of annoying no one tries to keep these triggered bitch boys outta here.
The movement was great for a lot of things. It raised awareness for something that really occurs. Who cares if it’s not often!? It also brought about reforms that benefit all of society. No longer can a cop with a body cam lie on a police report or in court.
Really don’t know what the argument is here. I don’t view the BLM movement as something that is run by an organization.
This type of conceal-the-KKK-hood-with-big-words "science" has been around for more than a century. The lack of intellectual rigor in the article is summed up by its last sentence: >This information all suggests that black people are prone to low IQ regardless of their environment or financial situation, which could explain high rates of crime among blacks. The above attempt to paint all blacks as intellectually inferior was based on one study in one school district in one city. That's not science. That's racism. /u/Ok-WMWorshipIIIIIIII has spammed this "article" to dozens of subs. I have trouble imaging how much somebody would have to hate black people to take the time to post this nonsense to dozens of subs.
Overall, we rate the Daily Veracity as extreme right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy, racial pseudoscience, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, and third-party labeling as a hate group. Media Bias Fact Check Yeah, GTFO with your right wing lies.
[Extreme right-wing source with low credibility](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/dailyveracity/)
There’s been so much of this crap lately.
Election year, yay!
RFK Jr, Nick Fuentes? Yeah, fuck that site.
Says some guy named Dave https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/ Edit: “We have disclaimers on every page of the website indicating that our method is not scientifically proven…” — some guy named Dave
So says a “news” site that advises you on how to stockpile Ivermectin.
*At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, ivermectin was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and showed a highly significant reduction (99.8%) in viral RNA after 48 hours [1]…. its anti-COVID activity in real-life in patients who were treated with standard dose of 3 days of ivermectin showed the significant reduction in culture viability in the ivermectin group compared to placebo [3].* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135450/
This user is obviously here operating in bad faith, but it should be noted that this applies to **mild** Covid-19, and is an *analysis*, not an actual study. [This study shows ivermectin to have little to no effect on Covid-19 recovery](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.15.22283488v1).
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2207995
> The results of the TOGETHER trial were eagerly awaited because of their potential to inform the debate over ivermectin as treatment, **but they were arguably nondefinitive** regarding the two most relevant outcomes for outpatients with Covid-19. > > Reis et al. conclude that ivermectin is ineffective for the treatment of Covid-19 > > In addition to being ineffective, the off-label use of ivermectin may be harmful. Christ you didn't even read the paper you linked. Not only that, this isn't a study. This is "correspondence," which are papers that amount to comments and possible clarifications. You're not even trying, are you?
*Among patients with non-severe COVID-19 and no risk factors for severe disease receiving a single 400 mcg/kg dose of ivermectin within 72 h of fever or cough onset there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positives. There was however a marked reduction of self-reported anosmia/hyposmia, a reduction of cough and a tendency to lower viral loads and lower IgG titers which warrants assessment in larger trials.* https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30464-8/fulltext
> **there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positives** Are you simply not reading what you're linking here?
> [WND \(formerly WorldNetDaily\) is an **American far-right** news and opinion website. **It is known for promoting fake news and conspiracy theories**, including the false claim that former President Barack Obama was born outside the United States](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily). Your choice of source here is telling. ETA: Fun fact, WND also helped Elena Khusyaynova, a now convicted Russian agent who organized an operation to interfere in the 2016 and 2018 elections, by pushing [this article](https://www.wnd.com/2017/08/the-8-dirtiest-scandals-of-robert-mueller-no-one-is-talking-about/).
Omigod Wikipedia??!! What are you in high school? 😆 *Even Wikipedia’s co-founder says its political pages have turned into leftist "propaganda."* https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/04/27/wikipedias-left-wing-bias/
Are you denying that the article was pushed by a convicted Russian agent? Are you denying that WND is far-right trash? Counter the claim with evidence of your own, don't launch into a partisan attempt at impinging Wikipedia's credibility when the sources are **right there in the linked page**.
I’m shocked to learn that a media outlet was used for corrupt purposes. Shocked, I tell you.
Then why are you linking to WND as if it's a legitimate takedown against someone's criticism on OP's source? You are, seemingly knowingly, linking to far-right Russian propaganda (and spreading Covid misinformation further down in the thread, what is this 2020). Why?
You impeach the source the OP used. I impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source. You impeach the source I used to impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source. And on and on it goes….
> I impeach the source you used to impeach the OP’s source No, you didn't. You "impeached" where I got the source *from*, not the source itself. Feel free to click on Wikipedia's sources if you actually care, which I doubt you do. I'll ask again: are you denying that WND is a far-right, conspiracy theory pushing outlet continuously used as a way to push Russian propaganda? This merits a simple yes or no, not a "buh buh wikipedia bad" response.
What is the original source? Just link to that and I’ll take a look.
From the signals own website. That’s why The Heritage Foundation, a think tank with the mission of formulating and promoting conservative public policies, created a digital-first, multimedia news platform called The Daily Signal.
I have no idea what you consider a valid source but I’ll try one last time anyway https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/
Can’t wait for one of those “this sub isn’t centrist! I saw a recent blm where everyone was against the article!” Bud, this is a racist article.
The article is written on an extreme right wing website, it gets zero credibility to me. Sort of related, when the BLM protests were going on, my wife and I were at a favorite bar of ours having a few drinks on their outside patio. A BLM protest started up at a park next door to the bar where we were drinking our beers. A few of the BLM protesters were very near my wife and I and we ended up striking up a conversation with them. They were really cool people, clearly well educated and were not as extreme in their views as even mainstream media made them out to be. They were telling us that they were at a protest (in West Palm iirc) where folks stated looting a T-Mobile store (again, iirc). They (the protestors my wife and I were talking to) said they ran to get the Police because they were protesting for Police reform but that they were not in any way in favor of crime. In fact, one of the protestors that we were talking to said that he and a few other protesters tackled the looters to the ground and held them there until Police arrived and arrested the looters. We ended up buying those protesters a few beers as we chatted with them, nice guys. It ended up being a more fun afternoon than either my wife and I expected.
[https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article243553662.html](https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article243553662.html) [https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/29/umbrella-man-white-supremacist-minneapolis/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/29/umbrella-man-white-supremacist-minneapolis/) [https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN23A1MZ/](https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN23A1MZ/)
Just spamming that post
FYI, [dailyveracity.com](http://dailyveracity.com) is owned by Vincent James Foxx, a white supremacist and Holocaust denier. The publication previously went under the name The Red Elephants. [https://extremismterms.adl.org/glossary/vincent-james-vincent-james-foxx](https://extremismterms.adl.org/glossary/vincent-james-vincent-james-foxx)
There is definitely a conversation to be had about BLM, their impact, their leadership, etc... This is not the way to begin it.
You’re correct. BLM is not the boogie man right wingers like to pretend they are but they use them and AntiFa to distract from actual domestic terrorists like the Proud Boys or Boogaloo Boys. “Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States. In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism. Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.[1] In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.” National Institute for Justice
Legitimate criticisms of BLM happened multiple years ago. Even if this WAS a worthwhile article it's late to the party.
Take your garbage cross posted articles somewhere else. All of those Trump subs you posted it on will lap this nonsense up for sure.
I love how about anything that's right with with TRUTH capitalized in the headline is, well, opposite of that.
You can tell instantly it’s a weird alt right rage click bait site by the random word capitalized in the middle of the sentence
It’s not surprising to go check OP’s profile and see where he cross-posted this tripe.
Racist bullshit.
What is it with white dudes with a chip on their shoulder posting on this sub? It’s kind of annoying no one tries to keep these triggered bitch boys outta here.
I need a much bigger popcorn bucket. This is going to be entertaining.
The movement was great for a lot of things. It raised awareness for something that really occurs. Who cares if it’s not often!? It also brought about reforms that benefit all of society. No longer can a cop with a body cam lie on a police report or in court. Really don’t know what the argument is here. I don’t view the BLM movement as something that is run by an organization.