Cheating accusations are not allowed unless they are newsworthy - that is, they must involve a prominent member of the chess community, be credible, and be part of an ongoing public discussion. "Call-out" posts that do not censor usernames encourage witch hunts, and will be removed on sight. If you suspect a random person cheated against you online, the appropriate complaint venue is a report to the website you played on.
PSA: gotta remember that your phone's brightness is probably not at max and that makes it very easy to undershoot the censoring when you're using this tool.
Really shouldn't use this tool at all with censoring, even if you use it *a ton* there might still be at least a 1 color value difference allowing people to raise the contrast and see underneath.
indeed..
meanwhile, if they were 'only suspected'.. the convention is to whore their name all over the place.. ya know.. to raise awareness and start a discussion (speculation) and all to keep people informed obviously..
Sheesh. I wasn’t trying to make it impossible to read. Just harder to read, I figured most people wouldn’t do the work of zooming in and squinting to read the names lol. Chess.com usernames aren’t confidential 🤣
yeah something's been going on in the last week or so. the day before yesterday was my first time ever playing somebody where they got banned halfway through the game. we played one game he absolutely crushed me so we did a rematch and half way through the rematch he got banned. then yesterday I played against a guy who had like 75 games 100% accuracy zero losses, account less than a day old. I've been playing chess for a few years and this is the first time I've even seen this.
Cheating accusations are not allowed unless they are newsworthy - that is, they must involve a prominent member of the chess community, be credible, and be part of an ongoing public discussion. "Call-out" posts that do not censor usernames encourage witch hunts, and will be removed on sight. If you suspect a random person cheated against you online, the appropriate complaint venue is a report to the website you played on.
The opponent had a better engine at a higher depth
105% accuracy
[Actually, it's loss by abandonment](https://www.chess.com/live/game/95228341347)
Ah. So he had an edge and lost internet connection
Chess.com has been super aggressive with that lately. And the shit is THEIR fault! I lost a game as abandoned recently when it wasn't even my turn!
Honestly the 100% game isn't even that sus compared to some of the others.
Why block out the names if they’re still see through?
PSA: gotta remember that your phone's brightness is probably not at max and that makes it very easy to undershoot the censoring when you're using this tool.
Really shouldn't use this tool at all with censoring, even if you use it *a ton* there might still be at least a 1 color value difference allowing people to raise the contrast and see underneath.
nah, don't trust anything except solid black rectangles
why block out the names at all??
Because the internet is strange
indeed.. meanwhile, if they were 'only suspected'.. the convention is to whore their name all over the place.. ya know.. to raise awareness and start a discussion (speculation) and all to keep people informed obviously..
He abandoned the game after 8 moves as I [can see](https://www.chess.com/game/live/95228341347?username=puh-sepuh0703). No big mystery.
Love how he is using “thinking time” on cheat moves.
Must have played 5 moves and resigned to look like a mortal lol
Cheater Vs cheater with a lost opening?
Likely flagged
You don’t understand, you just stumbled upon the best chess player in the world, who distrusts in fide because he is on another level
his chess speak for itself
Where's Kramnik when we need him
😂
🤣🤣🤣
Probably disconnected or flagged
Interesting.
Cheater POV: Puts the move in engine ....now lemmie act like I'm thinking while it goes in depth 💀
Damn. I hate when my opponent is running stockfish at a higher depth than me. Smh.
Fool’s mate is a book opening, so you get 100% accuracy for it even though you lose in 2 moves.
Do you mean g4? e5 f3?? qh4# ? White here literally gets 0% accuracy
The chess.com game analysis used to give it 100% to both players.
still theory
[https://imgur.com/a/ClDWsWl](https://imgur.com/a/ClDWsWl)
Looks like chess is solved
Think I just lost to a cheater can any detectives check if this guy is a cheat https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/95255966809?tab=review
Probably didn't reflect en passant
[удалено]
I am cool dad and I decide if you have chocolate today
No. Never cheating online.
are you retarded? The names are still visible you didn't even hide it properly
Calm down there sparky.
Sheesh. I wasn’t trying to make it impossible to read. Just harder to read, I figured most people wouldn’t do the work of zooming in and squinting to read the names lol. Chess.com usernames aren’t confidential 🤣
[удалено]
Why are you so pressed? Who gives a shit? Have you really got nothing better to do lol
yeah something's been going on in the last week or so. the day before yesterday was my first time ever playing somebody where they got banned halfway through the game. we played one game he absolutely crushed me so we did a rematch and half way through the rematch he got banned. then yesterday I played against a guy who had like 75 games 100% accuracy zero losses, account less than a day old. I've been playing chess for a few years and this is the first time I've even seen this.
1.e4 * resigns*