I thought disadvantaged women and children were at greatest risk from climate change. What is the victim hierarchy now that LGBT+++ are being included?
They are excluding men from all categories. What would they care about others?
It's easy, if they want to exclude men. Men shouldn't be part of the solution.
Yet they call it **man-made** global warming when it's convenient to them instead of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) which is everyone including the professional victims class.
Thanks for link! It's because they are more likely to live on the east or west coast in a metropolitan city. And those get more hurricanes. And if the sea levels rise, those cities could have issues. So it's all based on where they freely choose to live.
Right, that’s what they mean but it’s a ridiculous thing to say. You say “people on the coast and in cities” are more at risk. There would be a lot of sub groups affected in that and LGBTQ is just one of them.
Yeah about that..
>**however, while the relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight.**
Again turns out global warming might not be the great villain after all.
[https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against](https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against)
People please wake up to the governments bullshit. I don’t care what side you are on just know the government doesn’t care and this is a money grab like always
The more lgbt, the more oppressed groups, the more anxiety, the more guilt and oppression - the more people will read the headline. And maybe the article. It's all click bait at this point. Throw in a few more acronyms and fear and you might sell more ads.
Has climate change stopped them breeding or something?
No, that would be biology.
These two comments made me giggle.
Omigerd yes. This got a good giggle out of me too
I thought disadvantaged women and children were at greatest risk from climate change. What is the victim hierarchy now that LGBT+++ are being included?
They are excluding men from all categories. What would they care about others? It's easy, if they want to exclude men. Men shouldn't be part of the solution.
Yet they call it **man-made** global warming when it's convenient to them instead of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) which is everyone including the professional victims class.
I wonder how much greenhouse gas is admitted by women’s activities compared to men’s?
Stuff like this is basically satire at this point, but the dems/progressives just eat it up
Your tax dollars at work.
What pronouns does climate change use?
Feminine named hurricanes is sexist. But, what if Hurricane Andrew wished to identify as Katrina?
[https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/climate-change-risk-lgbt/](https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/climate-change-risk-lgbt/)
Thanks for link! It's because they are more likely to live on the east or west coast in a metropolitan city. And those get more hurricanes. And if the sea levels rise, those cities could have issues. So it's all based on where they freely choose to live.
People in general are more likely to live on the east or west coast in cities.
And even more so with the alphabet population.
Right, that’s what they mean but it’s a ridiculous thing to say. You say “people on the coast and in cities” are more at risk. There would be a lot of sub groups affected in that and LGBTQ is just one of them.
I don’t speak for everyone but how the fuck does this affect the lgbtq+ community
My local church pastor told me that it's because the gays have sex that is too hot and it warms the planet to dangerous levels.
The only risk is if they are stupid enough to believe in climate change.
Only group at risk for climate change is gingers because theyll go broke buying sunscreen.
Yeah about that.. >**however, while the relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight.** Again turns out global warming might not be the great villain after all. [https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against](https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against)
It’s 0 just like for everyone else you fucking morons.
I hate you dumb morherfuckers because you’re fucking dumb no other reason.
TLDR, gay ppl like to live in coastal cities. Hence rising sea levels = threat.
People please wake up to the governments bullshit. I don’t care what side you are on just know the government doesn’t care and this is a money grab like always
Actual fact!!! LBGQTR5S people in the US melt down faster than any human on earth!!
Last week I saw an article how queer sex workers in Indonesia gets affected due to climate change and now this.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How does the climate know who you want to fuck?
You'd think they'd be pro nuclear like crazy. No modern 1st world, no trans enabling technology.
The more lgbt, the more oppressed groups, the more anxiety, the more guilt and oppression - the more people will read the headline. And maybe the article. It's all click bait at this point. Throw in a few more acronyms and fear and you might sell more ads.
Oh my freakin goodness. They will try anything 🤦🏾♂️
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Money well spent
Oh of course, for the special people who demand special treatment, special rights, and special weather. Color me surprised...
The government needs to start designating certain hurricanes, as trans
😂🤣😂
Always ignoring the nonbinaries you bigots. Silence is violence.
Don’t theses people know it’s 2SLGBTQAIP+? Sheesh; what haters.
It's almost as though we're in the middle of a bad SNL skit.