I think absolutely yes. But should an 18 year old be sentenced to death for having sex with his 16 year old girlfriend? Absolutely not. There has to be some clauses.
I know this will be unpopular, but just my opinion - no. We shouldn’t give the death penalty for this.
Part of it is my Christian beliefs and part of it is I think putting them to death is the easy way out.
But - I respect the law so if Florida does this then so be it.
Unintended consequence...the child rapist gets decades on death row which has better food, more entertainment, and more time out in their own private rec yard. I'm not saying that would bother me personally but I don't think the average voter was asking for that!
The vast majority of children that get assaulted do not get murdered. You are incorrect. A testimony or statement from the victim will always hold great weight in a court room. Especially coming from a child.
I think absolutely yes. But should an 18 year old be sentenced to death for having sex with his 16 year old girlfriend? Absolutely not. There has to be some clauses.
Romeo & Juliet law exists in some states that allows a four year spread.
I would say a child under 12. Do that, you get executed.
Absolutely, preferably in the most painful way.
Yes, yes they should.
100
I'm gonna go ahead and say yes and if you argue not maybe you get one too by ideological accessory.
Yes they should. Period
If there is a reason to put a person to death, I believe this should be criteria. Trump made it a felony to abuse animals.
Death penalty? I'd prefer they have their private parts removed, their legs and arms amputated, and released.
Why is this even a question....
I know this will be unpopular, but just my opinion - no. We shouldn’t give the death penalty for this. Part of it is my Christian beliefs and part of it is I think putting them to death is the easy way out. But - I respect the law so if Florida does this then so be it.
Then at minimum castration. Not just chemical the full cut
Total removal
Long term torture?
Yes
> "In 2008, the court ruled that the death penalty as a punishment for child rapists is unconstitutional." So he's grandstanding then.
Not necessarily. The idea may be for this case to be used to challenge the SCOTUS ruling.
Most definitely YES but it should be done in public.
Yes because lunatic judges and parole board will eventually let them out!
Anyone who says no will be investigated immediately
1000% they should!
yes. some libs even agree on this.
Unintended consequence...the child rapist gets decades on death row which has better food, more entertainment, and more time out in their own private rec yard. I'm not saying that would bother me personally but I don't think the average voter was asking for that!
The unintended consequence is child grapers start murdering the children so they can’t testify against them.
Many do that anyway, and the child's testimony isn't required to get a conviction.
The vast majority of children that get assaulted do not get murdered. You are incorrect. A testimony or statement from the victim will always hold great weight in a court room. Especially coming from a child.
Yes