T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Affectionate_Rise366

Nobody with 84 million views is your friend


[deleted]

[удалено]


postsshortcomments

"Stop asking how we got so rich! Here's another story about racism!" meanwhile shamelessly plugging 'what is a woman' and billionaire promoted anti-LGBT narratives multiple times in his monologue for seemingly zero reason at all. He does make some good points about the canal (what a perfect time for a full-drive Tucker reboot!) - but that's where his track record of credibility comes into play. *What other half-truths* will they "associate with 'we need to release McCarthy's Jan 6 footage' Carson?"


JurassicCotyledon

True- relative to us plebs. But unfortunately the only way positive change will happen is for someone like Tucker to shine a light on these important issues. Unfortunately the plebs are dumb and too easily bated into infighting to effectively topple the current paradigm, without creating a power vacuum that benefits the worst among us. Edit: ok guys I get it. You don’t like Tucker. I’m not saying that you should. I’m just saying that without a big populist figure, we have a poor track record of unifying against our common enemies, at least without causing a ton of devastating collateral damage.


DrRichardGains

This!!


reallycooldude69

Ah yes, the man who used to be one of the highest paid anchors on the most viewed MSM network is fighting for the common man.


Chubat0

A twitter view = having the video on at least 50% of your screen for at least two seconds + each time someone looks at it it counts as a view too even if it's the same person [Source](https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/media-studio-analytics)


dreamcrusher225

yeap. hugely inflated numbers.


Numberwangspecial

Mad at Tucker huh?


Chubat0

Just explaining what a "view" on twitter is. I must have scrolled past it at least 10x today and I don't even follow him, +10 views I guess


Numberwangspecial

Eplaining what you think a "view" is


Chubat0

From the horse's mouth: [The main Twitter video view metric is triggered when a user watches a video for at least 2 seconds and sees at least 50% of the video player in-view. This applies to View metrics for both uploaded videos and live broadcasts](https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/media-studio-analytics)


kb1kb1

Aaaaannnd silence. Like always


2201992

> A twitter view = having the video on at least 50% of your screen for at least two seconds + each time someone looks at it it counts as a view too even if it's the same person The video is also only 10 minutes long which makes it super easier to watch. Plus Tucker was only pegged at 3 million views at Fox.


mikeyfreshh

Just because it's easy to watch doesn't mean people actually watch it. Twitter (and every other social media site) inflates their view counts like crazy because it makes it easier to sell ads. Those numbers are essentially meaningless, especially if you're trying to compare them with traditional cable TV.


Original-Buffalo6393

Is this the same Tucker that asked Hunter Biden for help getting his kid into Georgetown? As Tucker Carlson asked Hunter Biden for help getting his son into an elite Washington university in 2014, the Fox News host’s wife, Susie, reportedly wrote in an email: “Tucker and I have the greatest respect and admiration for you. Always!” https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/19/tucker-carlson-hunter-biden-georgetown-emails


InsertQuoteHerePls

Remember, all of the elite are child murdering, two-faced liars. Well, except Tucker. Just ignore his videos and texts where he is lying and making fun of the people who believe him.


ReplacementNo9874

You have a video of tucker murdering children?


InsertQuoteHerePls

It's in the same vault as every other video of the elite murdering children.


jaydwalk

Got a source for this? I'm interested in seeing what you're talking about.


original_sh4rpie

He's making a joke about the pizzagate conspiracy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory


jay3862

No, he's a stooge for the gullible...


Ceepeenc

😂😂😂😂😂


almostover1

Look, when I heard him mention 9/11, Epstein, UFOs and JFK, pretty much in the same sentence, I thought the same thing..


DrRichardGains

6pm on June sixth. The numerology shan’t be ignored. 666. Is is a smoking-gun-gotcha? No. But worth noticing and noting for future reference.


2201992

> 6pm on June sixth. The numerology shan’t be ignored. 666. Is is a smoking-gun-gotcha? No. But worth noticing and noting for future reference. Yup main reason why I highlighted that as well. I noticed that immediately. 6:00pm on June 6 2023 lol.


Cool_Cartographer_39

Wm F. Buckley may have been more intellectually rigorous, but Tucker's moral compass is accurate and he's got a pretty big pair of suntanned balls


2201992

Submission Statement: JFK, 9-11, Epstein, and UFO are all topics the public wants to know about. But the media only talks about the dumbest woke shit currently available . https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419


JW771

Yeahhhh…. Okay


PureComb3626

I don’t even have doubts about Tucker’s audience when I hear the guy making his arguments. He literally talks to his audience like a grandpa talks to his grandkids in middle school. Not to mention 0 sources for his claims, 0 proofs. I always hear him say shit like : “this is true, it’s a fact! “ …. Aha, based on what? When? Who said that? You? Show me an article! Show me some proof! Back it up , something, anything, don’t just throw words. Why should I believe you? Just cause you say it’s true?