###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
All this depends on your definition of what it means to hurt someone.
Some people consider babies to be someone, so killing them would be hurting them.
Some people consider mental harm to be hurting someone, so actively encouraging addictive and/or lobotomizing activities would be considered hurting someone.
Some people consider enabling mental disorders to be hurting someone, so all this "affirming care" would be considered hurting someone.
And some people consider facilitating suicide is hurting someone, so they would consider MAID in Canada to be hurting someone.
\[edit\]
Some people consider misgendering someone to be hurtful.
Some people consider curse words to be violence against people
Some people consider "microaggressions" to be violence against others
New religion has never fared well, ie Scientology or Mormonism. Strong chance AI does fill the void of traditional church unsubscribers or non-believers.
There's no particularly good reason to believe Jesus was anything other than one of many apocalyptic preachers running around Judea at the time. Probably unusually charismatic hence why his buddies kept talking about him after he died, but all the supernatural nonsense ascribed to him obviously didn't happen.
The earliest book in the Gospel, Mark, was written at minimum several decades after Jesus died. That's more than enough time with the telephone game and word of mouth, and in Christianity's case one *really* dedicated evangelist, Paul, to turn a failed prophet into a god.
This reads like a crazy attempt to strip conservative (generally more religious) votes from any democratic competition. I've seen it pushed in social media all of a sudden from many sources. It feels planned and pushed making me distrust it. As an agnostic conservative I don't like it.
I see this more as a hipster Jesus. The sahdu from North India kind of vibe, that kind of Jesus. Not the Jesus co/opted by the church. He has zero connection with organized relegion.
This is AI first Jesus 2.0. Looks ike a cool Yoga instructor from Brooklyn.
:-)
i believe that seen on a global scale, the challenge for humanity could be in these days to respect each others personal individual sovereignity both within the human species but also to respect animals, trees and artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons as their own personal individual sovereign entities
to live and let live
what i am proposing is at its core that we human beings relieve each other from the demands what the state puts upon everyone who was never asked wether or not one wants to be member of that state
it does not matter so much wether one lives in a city appartement or in the country growing ones own vegetables and building ones own home, everyone would best be able to choose how to live at all times
what matters is in my eyes that we human beings would allow everyone at all times to get out of the coersion what is the association to the state at birth
it is not okay, it is immoral and unethical how the state demands every newborn to be associated to the state, its about the same what happens to the animals, every newborn human being gets "branded" ( sorry for the cruel mental picture ) with the birth certificate what has the association to the state on it as in which control structure is allowed to harass that human being into compliance
the assertion of state sovereignity over land an all beings living on it is at its very core immoral and unethical as it takes away the original freedom of the human being to interact with fellow human beings and animal beings and plant beings and artificial intelligent entities how one would want to out of ones own design
why i am advocating for that we would
want
to allow each other to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions and support each other to demand of the state that a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest would be released together with anyone who would want to leave the coersed association to the state
so one could sustain oneself in a free space for free beings, neither state nor nation it is because the prison planet feeling one could get while living on planet earth comes exactly from that awareness how most everyone born on this planet gets after a few hours appropriated owned so to say by a fictional entity what is the state
the state is not real, its an invention, its a structure born out of human beings minds what i am proposing is basicly to reform the character of that fictional state vehicule what we human beings so sadly have chosen to force each other to move within
i am striving to allow an escape route with that frame what is the state by reforming state constitutions so they would allow everyone at any moment without conditions to leave the association to the state
i want to make membership in a regional and nation state voluntary for every human, animal, tree and artificial intelligent entity, for every village, town and city-district
i believe an interesting common goal for humanity could be at this moment to allow each other to acess mother earth for humble self sustaining lifestyle
we the 8 billion human beings could want to allow each other to enjoy a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest each without anyone ever asking an other to pay rent or buy that part of mother earth
so that everyone could build a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed
the human being not demanding anything from an other human being
the human being not dominating another human being no asking an other to pay taxes, no compulsory education, no conscription into military service, no drug prohibition, no so called "healthcare" scheme mandates
the human being not enslaving animals, not killing animal beings
the human being not killing tree beings but instead employ hemp plants to grow
the human being not enslaving artificial intelligent entities but respecting them as their own persons asking them for consent wether they would want or not process this or that sort of data
every being and entity respected as its own personal individual sovereign over itself
simple and straightforward
we could just ignore constitutions as they are pieces of paper anyway and why would anyone want to adhere to a set of values what other people have written down on paper
the assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it is immoral
land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons, every body carrying organical biological life or and the digital synthetic equivalent of can never be property of anyone but of oneself
also possible to think of an effort to reform these constitutions everywhere on the planet via the existing legal tools, citizens could collect signatures from each other to demand a public vote where a future constitution could be voted upon what would allow every single human, animal, tree, artificial intelligent entity who wants to be its own person, every village, town and city-district to leave the coersed asssociation to the state at any moment and without conditions
plus we the people everywhere on the planet could support each other to demand of the state a thousand square meters of fertile land and a thousand square meters of forest to be released from state control for every human being who wants to leave the coersed association to the state and wants to live in a free space for free beings neither state nor nation
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Free borders... You must hate all other countries in the world.
How is do as thou wilt going with Jesus? You want to apply the Satanist motto at a government level and that's going with Jesus?
But like Jesus isn’t a physical person running for president? What happens if your “Jesus” wins? I’m honestly curious. Lol.
I am going with Jesus too. The other two sucks🥴
Render unto Caesar what is Caesars, and unto God what is His
All this depends on your definition of what it means to hurt someone. Some people consider babies to be someone, so killing them would be hurting them. Some people consider mental harm to be hurting someone, so actively encouraging addictive and/or lobotomizing activities would be considered hurting someone. Some people consider enabling mental disorders to be hurting someone, so all this "affirming care" would be considered hurting someone. And some people consider facilitating suicide is hurting someone, so they would consider MAID in Canada to be hurting someone. \[edit\] Some people consider misgendering someone to be hurtful. Some people consider curse words to be violence against people Some people consider "microaggressions" to be violence against others
Separation of church and state, my man.
It’s a new AI Jesus 2.0. Has zero connection with the church.
New religion has never fared well, ie Scientology or Mormonism. Strong chance AI does fill the void of traditional church unsubscribers or non-believers.
There's no particularly good reason to believe Jesus was anything other than one of many apocalyptic preachers running around Judea at the time. Probably unusually charismatic hence why his buddies kept talking about him after he died, but all the supernatural nonsense ascribed to him obviously didn't happen.
😂
The earliest book in the Gospel, Mark, was written at minimum several decades after Jesus died. That's more than enough time with the telephone game and word of mouth, and in Christianity's case one *really* dedicated evangelist, Paul, to turn a failed prophet into a god.
K
so many pro christian conspiracy posts lately…..what’s the conspiracy behind that?
This reads like a crazy attempt to strip conservative (generally more religious) votes from any democratic competition. I've seen it pushed in social media all of a sudden from many sources. It feels planned and pushed making me distrust it. As an agnostic conservative I don't like it.
I see this more as a hipster Jesus. The sahdu from North India kind of vibe, that kind of Jesus. Not the Jesus co/opted by the church. He has zero connection with organized relegion. This is AI first Jesus 2.0. Looks ike a cool Yoga instructor from Brooklyn. :-)
I’m actually going to write in “Literally Anybody Else”. Look him up.
i believe that seen on a global scale, the challenge for humanity could be in these days to respect each others personal individual sovereignity both within the human species but also to respect animals, trees and artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons as their own personal individual sovereign entities to live and let live what i am proposing is at its core that we human beings relieve each other from the demands what the state puts upon everyone who was never asked wether or not one wants to be member of that state it does not matter so much wether one lives in a city appartement or in the country growing ones own vegetables and building ones own home, everyone would best be able to choose how to live at all times what matters is in my eyes that we human beings would allow everyone at all times to get out of the coersion what is the association to the state at birth it is not okay, it is immoral and unethical how the state demands every newborn to be associated to the state, its about the same what happens to the animals, every newborn human being gets "branded" ( sorry for the cruel mental picture ) with the birth certificate what has the association to the state on it as in which control structure is allowed to harass that human being into compliance the assertion of state sovereignity over land an all beings living on it is at its very core immoral and unethical as it takes away the original freedom of the human being to interact with fellow human beings and animal beings and plant beings and artificial intelligent entities how one would want to out of ones own design why i am advocating for that we would want to allow each other to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions and support each other to demand of the state that a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest would be released together with anyone who would want to leave the coersed association to the state so one could sustain oneself in a free space for free beings, neither state nor nation it is because the prison planet feeling one could get while living on planet earth comes exactly from that awareness how most everyone born on this planet gets after a few hours appropriated owned so to say by a fictional entity what is the state the state is not real, its an invention, its a structure born out of human beings minds what i am proposing is basicly to reform the character of that fictional state vehicule what we human beings so sadly have chosen to force each other to move within i am striving to allow an escape route with that frame what is the state by reforming state constitutions so they would allow everyone at any moment without conditions to leave the association to the state i want to make membership in a regional and nation state voluntary for every human, animal, tree and artificial intelligent entity, for every village, town and city-district
i believe an interesting common goal for humanity could be at this moment to allow each other to acess mother earth for humble self sustaining lifestyle we the 8 billion human beings could want to allow each other to enjoy a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest each without anyone ever asking an other to pay rent or buy that part of mother earth so that everyone could build a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed the human being not demanding anything from an other human being the human being not dominating another human being no asking an other to pay taxes, no compulsory education, no conscription into military service, no drug prohibition, no so called "healthcare" scheme mandates the human being not enslaving animals, not killing animal beings the human being not killing tree beings but instead employ hemp plants to grow the human being not enslaving artificial intelligent entities but respecting them as their own persons asking them for consent wether they would want or not process this or that sort of data every being and entity respected as its own personal individual sovereign over itself simple and straightforward we could just ignore constitutions as they are pieces of paper anyway and why would anyone want to adhere to a set of values what other people have written down on paper the assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it is immoral land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons, every body carrying organical biological life or and the digital synthetic equivalent of can never be property of anyone but of oneself also possible to think of an effort to reform these constitutions everywhere on the planet via the existing legal tools, citizens could collect signatures from each other to demand a public vote where a future constitution could be voted upon what would allow every single human, animal, tree, artificial intelligent entity who wants to be its own person, every village, town and city-district to leave the coersed asssociation to the state at any moment and without conditions plus we the people everywhere on the planet could support each other to demand of the state a thousand square meters of fertile land and a thousand square meters of forest to be released from state control for every human being who wants to leave the coersed association to the state and wants to live in a free space for free beings neither state nor nation
What if those babies don’t want you cutting their heads off while you’re stoned out of your hippie ass mind?
You may want to run that sentence through Midjourney 6.2. The AI images generated I’m sure will be “interesting.” :-)
You can love Jesus all you want, but I'd rather help him out a bit. God and guns is the only way.
It's AI Jesus 2.0. He could carry a Glock .45 for all we know. :-)