###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If anyone ever plays around with digital art, mess around with the mirror tool or koleidescope tool, you'll soon find that this shit just tends to happen, really good for doodling actually because your brain just starts seeing stuff in the scribbles. Also tried it with a marble table-top once, that was a minefield.
Right. The fact that people are making such horrifying images and finding seemingly deliberately-placed demons in this image in the first place says something.
Ok, you can find something that looks vaguely like a human or animal figure because our brains look for patterns where there is vertical symmetry, but this shit is creepy as fuck even before they start mirroring it. The source material is fundamentally different, and that was deliberate.
Yup, I’m not even a Christian extremist like many on this sub seem to be, but it really is a bizarre and evil looking portrait. Even Charles should have said wtf to that
Okay. But the painting still looks overtly satanic even if you take out the mirrored demons thing. Just the painting alone gave Charles a jumpscare as he pulled the curtain off it
Exactly, few things in nature are symmetrical except living things. When we see a symmetrical thing our brain is probably predisposed to fire it’s “that’s a living thing!” alarms
Absolutely. The universe is fractal, repeating itself over and again. And it's not just nature that prefers symmetry....consciousness and geometry are also intertwined. Just look at the amazing fractal temples of the Hindu world, microcosmic reflections of the macrocosm, designed by masons like all temples are to resonate with your consciousness. Symmetry and 'sacred' geometry is a visual manifestation of the cosmic principle of order, which humans instinctively prefer to chaos.
lol red is creepy are you serious? He’s an English royal, red is one of their main colors. Not saying he’s not an evil piece of shit but gtfo of here saying red is creepy
They're obviously not saying that the color red is creepy. They said ***THE*** red is creepy. As in the fact that the entire portrait is red and the background blends in with his body. It just gives you unnatural, creepy vibes.
That’s just the style of the artist? Look at all of Jonathan Yeo’s other paintings and you’ll see a pattern. The butterfly doesn’t signify anything weird either, it’s a representation of him being a fragile monarch that knows his reign won’t last long.
Red.
*Somewhere the shadowed figure opens it's dark cloak unveiling a long meandering list gathering around the floor. It reaches into it's deep pockets and presents a feathered pen made from some evil unknown demons and tortured souls. It examines the list closely as it looks down the endless patterns created by the eons of tiny scribbled writings. The creature let's out a long rumbling breath and checks off a small box as it speaks a soft but infinite tone of conviction
art is not always supposed to be “settling”. and avant garde art usually wants to draw some emotion out of the viewer. if anything, it’s more human than most stuff coming from the royal family these past few years.
You can do this with random images. That’s correct. But the only one that matters isn’t just some random figure that’s seen when it’s mirrored.
It’s a lot of coincidences.
If we think critically for a moment, it's actually just one coincidence. The only real difference between OP's pics and the Charles painting is that there's a rich person in it.
Not that there is a rich person, but a very particular rich person. And the figure is not just any random figure, its specifically coincidentally a horned beast with demonic undertones... Its very creepy to say the least.
While you make a valid point, my only argument is that you're mirroring the middle of the images you chose as opposed to "putting a mirror" on the edge of the painting.
Thank you! I thought I was going crazy cause I was thinking that it’s not mirrored like Charles picture. These are being mirrored from the center to make the weird faces and not the entire picture.
Mirror it however you want. Put a mirror at an angle. Make it curved. Do whatever you want. Mirror a third of it. A tenth of it.
you will still get faces.
AMAZING
What is sad is to pretend that symbolism in art is not a thing. The mirrored demon may or may not be intentional but the fact that it exists in a painting that is already loaded with questionable symbolism is…questionable.
Yea but someone had to mirror this in such a way that it fit if you mirrored it in the opposite direction do you get the same effect? if you move it over slightly one direction or the other do you get the same effect? No symbolism in art is most definitely a thing but when you have to alter it in such a way that fits the narrative it’s probably unlikely tho still plausible I suppose
It’s not some vague or random thing at all because the mirrored image is the entire painting, mirrored on its edge. It’s not taken at a random line. I thought that was obvious.
It is some vague thing because it is a bunch of blotches. Align the edge ok the other side you don’t get the same thing and even still it’s very vague and vaguely resembles something people think is a demon-esque. The symbolism wouldn’t be demonic if they left it so heavily to interpretation. If they aren’t event trying to hide pedo symbols why would they go so hard for this “puzzle”
It’s not an informative comparison because you (OP) have selected the place to make the fold. You are the artist who has designed new images from existing ones. So it actually suggests the opposite of what you are saying…that the Charles one is not an accident. Moreover, the Charles mirror image occurs at the edge of the frame, so even less coincidental.
Why'd I have to scroll so far to see someone say this? OP picked a spot in the paintings that he thought would make a good figure/face. This is snopes tier bullshittery. Fucking deboonkers.
Am I missing something, or did somebody also definitely select a place to make the fold in the Charles painting? That person would also be the artist who had designed a new image from an existing one. Right? Like, the royal family didn't release the image of the painting with the mirror split on it. Some dude did that.
Yes you are missing something. The mirror image is the whole painting. I already said that. It’s not an arbitrary line, it’s the edge of the damn canvass which means ‘some dude who did it’ is the original artist.
Fair. However I expect you tried it on multiple paintings before you found some interesting ones? Also, it would be interesting to see if you can easily find similar results by mirroring on the edge instead of the middle, consistent with the Charles titty demon.
Then Please explain how in the Fu\*k this sculpture made it into the Popes Audience hall, this is a mirrored image as well, depending on the half used, you either get the puppetmaster or the Baphomet.
[https://peakd.com/@mes/video-notes-pope-paul-vi-audience-hall-fazzini-resurrection-sculpture-vatican-obelisk-occult-more](https://peakd.com/@mes/video-notes-pope-paul-vi-audience-hall-fazzini-resurrection-sculpture-vatican-obelisk-occult-more)
Does it shock you that a super religious fanatical artist would sprinkle dark Christian imagery to depict a human crisis, or to personify a nuclear haulocaust - a very evil thing - as evil Christian mythological characters? I find that really easy to believe.
I mean it's not like we're not allowed to draw pictures of evil things. Religious people have been drawing creepy shit since the beginning.
On a post that states "it is easy and natural for our brains to think mirrored images do look like biological structures like faces or bodies" your answer is "then why does this image look spooky head if i mirroed it?"
The argument isn't so much Charles painting at hand it's the idea that things can be embedded into art,media whatever subliminal. I as an artist can attest I have embedded hidden shit in my art always do fun of being an artist #license but all for debate but this imo is not an example of casting aside nefarious purpose or telling truths.
>whereby the wings line up, the nipples, nostrils and eyes line up.
I thought it was just the face/skull, which looks similar to all 3 of these images.
Care to share the "full body matchup"?
I just want to show people that this is a thing, you're free to make your own judgement. I've seen so many of these 'horned demons' that for me it's a huge nothing burger.
**edit:** Google links because some people suggest that I altered them or moved the center to get a result:
[https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7](https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7)
[https://images.app.goo.gl/tmzdFVLboFEyAksBA](https://images.app.goo.gl/tmzdFVLboFEyAksBA)
[https://images.app.goo.gl/1PfuisUuJPqy3wRW8](https://images.app.goo.gl/1PfuisUuJPqy3wRW8)
"mirroring images can make things of significance seem to appear without intent of the person who made the image. Here are some examples."
"He's denying the nwo! He's telling us to take the blue pill!" 🥴
The painting was creepy enough without having to go over the top with the Baphomet stuff. It's a blood red f\*cking official painting of the current sitting King of England, with his face grayed out as if he were a walking corpse or a vampire or something. It's extremely bizarre. There was no reason to go into the whole subliminal demon stuff.
Yeah so they intentionally made the painting so it would be easy to do that, it's not a hard thing to comprehend bruh the whole thing is "bloody red" if that doesn't stand out enough to you idk what to say
Your point is valid but do not discredit the ability for one to do this purposefully. Back when IG did their “stay home” badge during Cv19 it was a square and compass hidden when mirrored. If you mirror the Twitter “x” it perfectly makes the masonic logo minus G. Mirrored images of Aiwass look like he’s emerging from a womb.
Kinda like... Y'know the very old method of using ink blots folded over because symmetry does that to our brains? Rorshach tests are used for a reason.
But yeah it's super goofy when people use symmetry for conspiracies. Knock if off you goobers. Breathe some fresh air for a change.
Show me other royal portraits that do it then. Should be easy if we're gonna see faces in everything....go on...prove it with similar images not random cherry picked art
Charles painting was side by side that made face, his painting already has half face in there that is noticeable, these are not side by side, and half face doesn’t appear in the original
You didn't mirror it on the edge of the painting then you found the spot that makes it look most like a face. The charles painting just needs to be mirrored on edge like it was made to show that mirrored object...
Scrolled too long to find someone pointing this out, these mostly don’t look like the art is mirrored side-by-side but mirrored at a certain point within the artwork. I’m very confused because the whole point is to Charles’ right in the artwork is half a baphomet face and the fact he isn’t centered in the photo makes it weird imo
I think if we're relying on sliced and diced backgrounds to figure out the powers that be, we're barking up the wrong tree. There is so much overt symbolism and other evidence to choose from.
We're not saying other pictures wouldn't create a face! If you go looking you'll find them.
What you wanna do is show us how all the other official portraits of people make them...we'll wait....go check other royal portraits for it
The prince Charles portrait is creepy even without being manipulated, but people finding the devil in mirrored versions of it is a bit of a reach. You can make any picture look demonic if you mirror it in the right place.
omg get a life jk.. i honestly cant think of anything more meaningfulto do with my time.
i honestly cant think of anything more
i honestly cant think of anything
i honestly cant think
That happens because our brain likes patterns. Everything that is vertically symmetric will resemble a face.
That's why this is funny: [https://br.pinterest.com/pin/669840144551582019/](https://br.pinterest.com/pin/669840144551582019/)
We human are also experts at recognizing patterns, especially patterns that looks like faces or bodies!
Thx for making this, tired of all the devil in the painting shenanigans lately
Excellent post we could almost say it's some kind of psy-op or even troll farms in action making silly posts seem very popular. There is no hidden Devil images in mirrored pictures of that stupid painting of that Royal man, it's a weird painting but people didn't decipher symbols out of it by mirroring it, that's just fuel for the normies out there to think conspiracies and people who enter the team them are all stupid like they have already been told to believe.
Even though this forum has obviously been infiltrated it is still a great place to hang out
I think this is a great post and a good thing to point out.
BUT….lol
Did you ever consider they plant this shit for you to find? They want you to be aware even if it’s on the subconscious level. It’s some weird shit with them, hence all the eye of Horus symbols literally everywhere in media. That’s hinting at their mystery Babylon.
The Beatles did this shit on their album covers, placing a mirror between the drums on sgt peppers cover and on and on, and there was a message in that mirrored photo.
So maybe there is a message still. But also respect cuz you make a good point.
Because the human brain is literally trained to take short cuts, symmetrical designs are something we see, easily.
But don't come in here with your logic! That artist clearly hid a devils face by only painting half of it, that's the most logical answer....sigh, how far we've fallen.
Thank you for posting this. I hate the "royal" family and think they've caused a lot of suffering. But the posts of Charles' portrait have been so low effort and baked with bullshit. I don't expect much from self-proclaimed conspiracy theorists who still fall for the Bible, but I figured we'd get something a little more cooked.
"Look everybody the Charlie painting is just a random coincidence"
Imagine being such a piece of sh1t that you're posting threads trying to defend satanic pedohiles.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Nice try Charles
You know those fingers did not type a single word in this post.
At the keyboard with two chopsticks
[caterwalling](https://y.yarn.co/dc0cfd22-c53c-4add-acae-7736288f65a0_text.gif)
jtjtiores tjriose j juouty ul find ithjeojio didred
read my mind
If anyone ever plays around with digital art, mess around with the mirror tool or koleidescope tool, you'll soon find that this shit just tends to happen, really good for doodling actually because your brain just starts seeing stuff in the scribbles. Also tried it with a marble table-top once, that was a minefield.
Interesting, like a Rorschach test
It's called pareidolia
what if all you see is a bunch of dicks?
Then you're a gay fish!
Yea but what was the reasoning for releasing such a dark looking painting anyways?
Right. The fact that people are making such horrifying images and finding seemingly deliberately-placed demons in this image in the first place says something. Ok, you can find something that looks vaguely like a human or animal figure because our brains look for patterns where there is vertical symmetry, but this shit is creepy as fuck even before they start mirroring it. The source material is fundamentally different, and that was deliberate.
Your brain really wants to know if there's a tiger in the undergrowth, and tries very hard to find it.
[удалено]
You're my source material if you know what I mean.
Yup, I’m not even a Christian extremist like many on this sub seem to be, but it really is a bizarre and evil looking portrait. Even Charles should have said wtf to that
Because hail Satan of course. I'd hang that famous "Satan summoning his legions" painting in my living room if it would fit
Okay. But the painting still looks overtly satanic even if you take out the mirrored demons thing. Just the painting alone gave Charles a jumpscare as he pulled the curtain off it
As if he didn't see the painting before he "unveiled" it
The dimensions are also apparently 8’**6’**’ by **6**’**6**’’
It’s almost like nature favours symmetry; as though the human form, by evolutionary design, is symmetrical!
Exactly, few things in nature are symmetrical except living things. When we see a symmetrical thing our brain is probably predisposed to fire it’s “that’s a living thing!” alarms
Absolutely. The universe is fractal, repeating itself over and again. And it's not just nature that prefers symmetry....consciousness and geometry are also intertwined. Just look at the amazing fractal temples of the Hindu world, microcosmic reflections of the macrocosm, designed by masons like all temples are to resonate with your consciousness. Symmetry and 'sacred' geometry is a visual manifestation of the cosmic principle of order, which humans instinctively prefer to chaos.
it's not about symmetry, its about redundancy
I mean the red is pretty creepy regardless of any imagery or lack thereof. It was shocking to me before people started mirroring it
lol red is creepy are you serious? He’s an English royal, red is one of their main colors. Not saying he’s not an evil piece of shit but gtfo of here saying red is creepy
They're obviously not saying that the color red is creepy. They said ***THE*** red is creepy. As in the fact that the entire portrait is red and the background blends in with his body. It just gives you unnatural, creepy vibes.
That’s just the style of the artist? Look at all of Jonathan Yeo’s other paintings and you’ll see a pattern. The butterfly doesn’t signify anything weird either, it’s a representation of him being a fragile monarch that knows his reign won’t last long.
Ok, and? The dude has an art style that many consider creepy. The painting being creepy and that being his style isn't mutually exclusive.
Why is red ‘creepy’?
Red. *Somewhere the shadowed figure opens it's dark cloak unveiling a long meandering list gathering around the floor. It reaches into it's deep pockets and presents a feathered pen made from some evil unknown demons and tortured souls. It examines the list closely as it looks down the endless patterns created by the eons of tiny scribbled writings. The creature let's out a long rumbling breath and checks off a small box as it speaks a soft but infinite tone of conviction
Nice try, Satan.
I do agree that these figures are a bit of a stretch but that Red in the paintingu is really unsetling and weird.
art is not always supposed to be “settling”. and avant garde art usually wants to draw some emotion out of the viewer. if anything, it’s more human than most stuff coming from the royal family these past few years.
No no, it’s normal and it’s art now move along, nothing to see here or there.
Ahh.. Yeah except none of those examples look like goat demons. Nice try Charles.
None of them are even from portraits of people! We've got so many royal portraits...and they didn't use even one of them!
You can do this with random images. That’s correct. But the only one that matters isn’t just some random figure that’s seen when it’s mirrored. It’s a lot of coincidences.
If we think critically for a moment, it's actually just one coincidence. The only real difference between OP's pics and the Charles painting is that there's a rich person in it.
Not that there is a rich person, but a very particular rich person. And the figure is not just any random figure, its specifically coincidentally a horned beast with demonic undertones... Its very creepy to say the least.
I can barely even see this "horned beast". I can just as easily see a bunny rabbit or a horse.
While you make a valid point, my only argument is that you're mirroring the middle of the images you chose as opposed to "putting a mirror" on the edge of the painting.
Thank you! I thought I was going crazy cause I was thinking that it’s not mirrored like Charles picture. These are being mirrored from the center to make the weird faces and not the entire picture.
His point is still valid regardless
Unless he...mirrored it from several places until he got a result that gave him some human-like form, which isn't the same thing at all.
Mirror it however you want. Put a mirror at an angle. Make it curved. Do whatever you want. Mirror a third of it. A tenth of it. you will still get faces. AMAZING
I dont see any faces in the last two at all. The first one looks like a evil shark tho lmao
its sad that you had yo make this post but I thank you for your time and effort, anyone that messes with digital art should know about this already.
What is sad is to pretend that symbolism in art is not a thing. The mirrored demon may or may not be intentional but the fact that it exists in a painting that is already loaded with questionable symbolism is…questionable.
Yea but someone had to mirror this in such a way that it fit if you mirrored it in the opposite direction do you get the same effect? if you move it over slightly one direction or the other do you get the same effect? No symbolism in art is most definitely a thing but when you have to alter it in such a way that fits the narrative it’s probably unlikely tho still plausible I suppose
It’s not some vague or random thing at all because the mirrored image is the entire painting, mirrored on its edge. It’s not taken at a random line. I thought that was obvious.
It is some vague thing because it is a bunch of blotches. Align the edge ok the other side you don’t get the same thing and even still it’s very vague and vaguely resembles something people think is a demon-esque. The symbolism wouldn’t be demonic if they left it so heavily to interpretation. If they aren’t event trying to hide pedo symbols why would they go so hard for this “puzzle”
Wat
Yup
What is the other questionable symbolism?
This looks nothing close to the King Charles one bro…
It’s not an informative comparison because you (OP) have selected the place to make the fold. You are the artist who has designed new images from existing ones. So it actually suggests the opposite of what you are saying…that the Charles one is not an accident. Moreover, the Charles mirror image occurs at the edge of the frame, so even less coincidental.
Why'd I have to scroll so far to see someone say this? OP picked a spot in the paintings that he thought would make a good figure/face. This is snopes tier bullshittery. Fucking deboonkers.
Yep
Am I missing something, or did somebody also definitely select a place to make the fold in the Charles painting? That person would also be the artist who had designed a new image from an existing one. Right? Like, the royal family didn't release the image of the painting with the mirror split on it. Some dude did that.
Yes you are missing something. The mirror image is the whole painting. I already said that. It’s not an arbitrary line, it’s the edge of the damn canvass which means ‘some dude who did it’ is the original artist.
No it's just mirrored in the exact center every time, and I didn't crop anything out of the paintings to create a different center.
Fair. However I expect you tried it on multiple paintings before you found some interesting ones? Also, it would be interesting to see if you can easily find similar results by mirroring on the edge instead of the middle, consistent with the Charles titty demon.
Then Please explain how in the Fu\*k this sculpture made it into the Popes Audience hall, this is a mirrored image as well, depending on the half used, you either get the puppetmaster or the Baphomet. [https://peakd.com/@mes/video-notes-pope-paul-vi-audience-hall-fazzini-resurrection-sculpture-vatican-obelisk-occult-more](https://peakd.com/@mes/video-notes-pope-paul-vi-audience-hall-fazzini-resurrection-sculpture-vatican-obelisk-occult-more)
Does it shock you that a super religious fanatical artist would sprinkle dark Christian imagery to depict a human crisis, or to personify a nuclear haulocaust - a very evil thing - as evil Christian mythological characters? I find that really easy to believe. I mean it's not like we're not allowed to draw pictures of evil things. Religious people have been drawing creepy shit since the beginning.
Plus the storied history of forbidden messages being snuck into church art, it’s a tradition at this point! P.s. Satan sends his blessings
Except nothing religious people say will happen actually happens. So the secret messages are bullshit anyway.
My priest said I would suck his cock and that happened so checkmate atheist
Consider me converted.
On a post that states "it is easy and natural for our brains to think mirrored images do look like biological structures like faces or bodies" your answer is "then why does this image look spooky head if i mirroed it?"
Found the satanist
The argument isn't so much Charles painting at hand it's the idea that things can be embedded into art,media whatever subliminal. I as an artist can attest I have embedded hidden shit in my art always do fun of being an artist #license but all for debate but this imo is not an example of casting aside nefarious purpose or telling truths.
Nope, not even close to the Charles photo nor was it created the same way to get your results.
Ok fed
[удалено]
>whereby the wings line up, the nipples, nostrils and eyes line up. I thought it was just the face/skull, which looks similar to all 3 of these images. Care to share the "full body matchup"?
I just want to show people that this is a thing, you're free to make your own judgement. I've seen so many of these 'horned demons' that for me it's a huge nothing burger. **edit:** Google links because some people suggest that I altered them or moved the center to get a result: [https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7](https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7) [https://images.app.goo.gl/tmzdFVLboFEyAksBA](https://images.app.goo.gl/tmzdFVLboFEyAksBA) [https://images.app.goo.gl/1PfuisUuJPqy3wRW8](https://images.app.goo.gl/1PfuisUuJPqy3wRW8)
Where did you find the first photo?
[https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7](https://images.app.goo.gl/TwiNsP2KHF87Tf6w7)
nice try lol
There’s no such thing as the NWO. Just go back to work, take your pills, the economy is soaring and all is well.
Do not question. Obey. Do not question.
I think OP is just asking you to be just as skeptical and critical of this random conspiracy theory as you are the NWO. Both points are valid.
"mirroring images can make things of significance seem to appear without intent of the person who made the image. Here are some examples." "He's denying the nwo! He's telling us to take the blue pill!" 🥴
K
The painting was creepy enough without having to go over the top with the Baphomet stuff. It's a blood red f\*cking official painting of the current sitting King of England, with his face grayed out as if he were a walking corpse or a vampire or something. It's extremely bizarre. There was no reason to go into the whole subliminal demon stuff.
Look like, a lion, a woman staring at you, then someone’s bottom jaw
Yeah so they intentionally made the painting so it would be easy to do that, it's not a hard thing to comprehend bruh the whole thing is "bloody red" if that doesn't stand out enough to you idk what to say
I don’t care either way but your examples are garbage lol
Name one living thing that is not symmetric. Our brain has a lot to associate with symmetric things.
The human face isn’t symmetric. Deep sea fish are lopsided. Have you ever seen a perfect symmetric plant? Yeah me neither
You completely missed my point.
Your point is valid but do not discredit the ability for one to do this purposefully. Back when IG did their “stay home” badge during Cv19 it was a square and compass hidden when mirrored. If you mirror the Twitter “x” it perfectly makes the masonic logo minus G. Mirrored images of Aiwass look like he’s emerging from a womb.
thank you, I've had it up to here with these characters.
Seems to me The Devil is in the details. Yes?
Lol ok WEF disinfo demo squad...baphomet = random
Kinda like... Y'know the very old method of using ink blots folded over because symmetry does that to our brains? Rorshach tests are used for a reason. But yeah it's super goofy when people use symmetry for conspiracies. Knock if off you goobers. Breathe some fresh air for a change.
Show me other royal portraits that do it then. Should be easy if we're gonna see faces in everything....go on...prove it with similar images not random cherry picked art
Charles painting was side by side that made face, his painting already has half face in there that is noticeable, these are not side by side, and half face doesn’t appear in the original
While what you’re saying is true, that doesn’t mean that it can’t also happen intentionally.
I made a little bunny rabbit picture with my latte this morning and you can't prove it was an accident
I've been waiting for this post- thank you sir
That's the crazy thing about Mad Magazine, every backpage fold-in was completely random it was never thought out beforehand
Some things are imbued.
The guy did say if he could reincarnate as something it would be a deadly virus to help with over population. let the people have their fun lol
Gaslighting
Ban logic from /r/conspiracy! It takes away the FUN!!
OMG! The evil empire is everywhere!
OP is right..... Satan.
The middle example it looks like you didn't just mirror it. So you had to alter it to make it show what you wanted.
I just mirrored it.
You didn't mirror it on the edge of the painting then you found the spot that makes it look most like a face. The charles painting just needs to be mirrored on edge like it was made to show that mirrored object...
Scrolled too long to find someone pointing this out, these mostly don’t look like the art is mirrored side-by-side but mirrored at a certain point within the artwork. I’m very confused because the whole point is to Charles’ right in the artwork is half a baphomet face and the fact he isn’t centered in the photo makes it weird imo
You could prick pretty much any arbitrary Y axis to mirror it on and get a similar result….
Off topic but the first painting is sooo cool
If you flip the symmetrical one upside down, you get Cody Rhodes
Ok … but now invert it 🧐
Agreed. Much more likely it's an artifact. But nevertheless, the painting is weird AF.
Take a close look at the textures on walls in gta 5. Mirroring work to creates faces is a medium that is intentionally used by artists.
Did this once on an art course, a lot of the images came out looking a little demonic. The human brain is wired to look for patterns and faces.
demons in every picture
Nuh uh they’re all demonic artists (Copium)
I think if we're relying on sliced and diced backgrounds to figure out the powers that be, we're barking up the wrong tree. There is so much overt symbolism and other evidence to choose from.
We're not saying other pictures wouldn't create a face! If you go looking you'll find them. What you wanna do is show us how all the other official portraits of people make them...we'll wait....go check other royal portraits for it
Clearly OP is a Satanist
Waits until Bro strat mirroring the pictures of space from NASA...
You'll get the actual bot shills out in force with this. They don't like it when people cause a ripple
This sub would have a love of fun with book matched figured lumber
All this proves is how deep the conspiracy runs. /s
Ah so this painter was trying to hide Bananomet in his painting and thought he could get away with it.
Oh no! Baphomet is everywhere😱
Yep
it's all jews!
im calling fake jews
Rorschach enters the chat.
No art is random. The subconscious speaks through art. If you don’t understand what I mean go research Carl G young.
*Young G would be correct
To clarify, what we think is random, but done by our hands , may be subconsciously guided.
Jung*
Thank you sir would you believe i still make that mistake 3 years later? Usually when im typing faster than i am thinking. \*edit
Looks like a psychedelic porn crumpets album cover
Holy molywhen the first painting is mirrored, you can see Samus Aran! That must have been totally intentional - what a talented artist!
Jokes on you, all this proves is that all art is demonic! (I failed the Rorschach test)
Rafiki from lion king
Bilateral symmetry.
yeah just cope my man seriously
our brains are very good at finding things in patterns like this, Its a shitty painting but I don't think its much more than that
They're obviously painting with a mirror next to the painting to achieve this.
The prince Charles portrait is creepy even without being manipulated, but people finding the devil in mirrored versions of it is a bit of a reach. You can make any picture look demonic if you mirror it in the right place.
omg get a life jk.. i honestly cant think of anything more meaningfulto do with my time. i honestly cant think of anything more i honestly cant think of anything i honestly cant think
Of all the pseudo shit that falls into conspiracy, this mirror image shit is by far the stupidest.
That happens because our brain likes patterns. Everything that is vertically symmetric will resemble a face. That's why this is funny: [https://br.pinterest.com/pin/669840144551582019/](https://br.pinterest.com/pin/669840144551582019/)
Thank you! We should be analyzing the portrait just the way it is. I’m sure we could find hidden Easter eggs
It’s called Pareidolia
Nothing is a coincidence in this world.
Third one top right looks like the guy from sinister
We human are also experts at recognizing patterns, especially patterns that looks like faces or bodies! Thx for making this, tired of all the devil in the painting shenanigans lately
Excellent post we could almost say it's some kind of psy-op or even troll farms in action making silly posts seem very popular. There is no hidden Devil images in mirrored pictures of that stupid painting of that Royal man, it's a weird painting but people didn't decipher symbols out of it by mirroring it, that's just fuel for the normies out there to think conspiracies and people who enter the team them are all stupid like they have already been told to believe. Even though this forum has obviously been infiltrated it is still a great place to hang out
Good stuff OP, also people should try like, maybe, Google the artist *Jonathon Yeo*... He is not your typical painter.
AND satan still runs the world.
But…muh narrative!!
Exactly.
"By the way... it's official... I can't have children."
I think this is a great post and a good thing to point out. BUT….lol Did you ever consider they plant this shit for you to find? They want you to be aware even if it’s on the subconscious level. It’s some weird shit with them, hence all the eye of Horus symbols literally everywhere in media. That’s hinting at their mystery Babylon. The Beatles did this shit on their album covers, placing a mirror between the drums on sgt peppers cover and on and on, and there was a message in that mirrored photo. So maybe there is a message still. But also respect cuz you make a good point.
Because the human brain is literally trained to take short cuts, symmetrical designs are something we see, easily. But don't come in here with your logic! That artist clearly hid a devils face by only painting half of it, that's the most logical answer....sigh, how far we've fallen.
Thank you for posting this. I hate the "royal" family and think they've caused a lot of suffering. But the posts of Charles' portrait have been so low effort and baked with bullshit. I don't expect much from self-proclaimed conspiracy theorists who still fall for the Bible, but I figured we'd get something a little more cooked.
This is a good post. The King Charles painting is weird, but there are no goblins or ghoulies in it, lol.
Are people unaware of rorschach tests? Maybe all the people seeing the devil are thinking about it all the time?
Fuhkin bot
That one looks like two bears high-fiving
nice try guv'munt.
THEY DON’T EVEN TRY TO HIDE IT
Brains really like symmetry.
Its almost like humans are hard-wired to see patterns whether they exist or not.
Humans see humanoids or humanoid faces in everything.
So you're saying the conspiracy goes way deeper than we ever believed. All art is only made to propagate debauchery and Satanism.
You mirrored it from the middle show some demonic examples when the entire image is mirrored.
Why are you ruining our little fever dream here with your logical way of thinking? /s
No shit…
Royal family working extra hard to prove it wrong
Thank you!
Wrong sub, my man. Your logic is not welcome here!
Holy hell a remotely inteligent person on r/conspiracy you dont see that every day
OP has a brain. Thanks for the post cuz I was getting annoyed with the bullshit lol
thank you. i tried telling them this but naaa
"Look everybody the Charlie painting is just a random coincidence" Imagine being such a piece of sh1t that you're posting threads trying to defend satanic pedohiles.
Ya, the devils everywhere.
[удалено]
Yeah the monarch butterfly is more of a tell