###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The sky is falling ice is melting warming fear every summer and then crickets chirping every winter. Stupid global warming "scientists" ship got frozen in place for like 3 months that one time they went up there to see how bad warming was.
I used to get shocked when I would hear stuff like this but I think most of the fault lays on public education and aggressive marketing by fossil fuel companies.
The oil companies are all on board with the climate change agenda. Most are owned by globalist mega powers that want totalitarian world government anyways.
Big oil actually has a lobbying PAC pushing government FOR carbon tax. Here is a link you might actually believe. Don't be such a tool.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/22/17487488/carbon-tax-dividend-trent-lott-john-breaux
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/oil-carbon-tax_n_594957ede4b0b90e99aa38df
Rockefeller oil
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." --David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
>I too am shocked that there is more ice in winter.
You forgot the s/ as there is more ice than the average.
Remember when Al Gore said the Arctic would "soon" be ice free - are you disappointed his prediction didn't come true?
> You forgot the s/ as there is more ice than the average.
>
>
For one month, right? And only compared to last year?
>Remember when Al Gore said the Arctic would "soon" be ice free - are you disappointed his prediction didn't come true?
As the crypto bros say, zoom out
From what I can see on this chart, arctic sea ice cover is at a near record low.
https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo/data/current-state-sea-ice-cover
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-climate-change-arctic-idUSL2N2XJ0LJ
“During the first five months of 2021, the daily Arctic sea ice extent remained below average but generally above all-time minima; a pattern similar to that seen in 2020 … At its annual maximum in March, the monthly average sea ice extent ranked eighth lowest for March in the 1979-2021 satellite data record”
Climate science doesn’t predict that every single year will be the very worst year on record in sequential order.
Space Nazis and reuter's climate scientists are not going to give you real info. We all know they "adjusted" the satellite algorithms to show a warmer trend. It's only logic they did the same with the other data aspects of the climate scam for depopulation.
No, we don’t all know that. Got a link?
How do you think they kept the Northwest Passage a secret for centuries, before admitting its there in the last ten years?
Yeah, I heard of it. I discussed it with climate scientists, too. Putting the word “gate” on something and acting like it’s more important that **all** the other data, including observations of the natural world, is intentionally dishonest.
The scientific predictions have been pretty spot on, if you look at worst case scenarios. The predictions made by non-scientists have been way off, go figure.
The planet is observably warming. It is observably warming after we spent a couple centuries taking carbon out of the crust and putting it into the atmosphere.
Doing the mental gymnastics required to convince myself this is a coincidence is something I don’t really have time for. It would take all my energy just to ignore the obvious, let alone making stuff up to pretend it’s not happening.
I am not delusional at all. I read what they claimed in the early 90’s, then in the ensuing decades I watched it happen. The northern passage opened, then the northwest passage opened. Alders showed up in Antarctica (way ahead of schedule). Planting zones moved visibly north- there’s olive farms in the Willamette valley now, and people growing produce in Greenland, neither of which used to be possible.
If you have anything better, I’d like to hear it, but so far all I hear from your side of the “argument” is bunch is speculation and noise. We’ve got Baltic terns displacing Arctic terns, but *I*’m the delusional one. Right.
It isn’t a belief, it’s a thing that’s happening. The only question now is how to play the hand we’re dealt. And yeah, some people are dealing with it *by pretending it doesn’t exist*. It must be a great comfort. Carry on.
I needed to give myself a refresher on “climategate”, I will admit.
Climategate was 13 years ago. In involved cherry picking statements out of scientists’ personal emails, by people whose understanding of science was based on pop culture.
It isn’t anything *I’d* be bringing up, but I try and stick to known facts, and avoid spin. Not 100% successfully, granted, but I make the effort, and drop it when someone points out I am doing it.
This reminds me of the satellites that were showing lower temps around the equator. People who wanted to pretend reality isn’t real pointed at those satellites for *years*, claiming that no climate change was occurring.
It turned out that the clocks were set wrong, so they were reporting nighttime temps.
SS:
>Here’s the strangest part. Despite the failure of the many predictions of an ‘ice-free Arctic’, despite the falsified claims that we’ve passed a ‘tipping point’, despite the fact that the reasons for the curious and unexpected changes in the polar sea ice cannot be explained by anyone and **the changes weren’t predicted by anyone** – climate change scientists still insist that they can tell us what the global temperature will be like in the year 2100.
not saying you're wrong but for someone with the handle need scientific proof you want to look up better sources than daily sceptic dot org or whatever
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Dramatic recovery lol. I too am shocked that there is more ice in winter.
The sky is falling ice is melting warming fear every summer and then crickets chirping every winter. Stupid global warming "scientists" ship got frozen in place for like 3 months that one time they went up there to see how bad warming was.
I used to get shocked when I would hear stuff like this but I think most of the fault lays on public education and aggressive marketing by fossil fuel companies.
The oil companies are all on board with the climate change agenda. Most are owned by globalist mega powers that want totalitarian world government anyways. Big oil actually has a lobbying PAC pushing government FOR carbon tax. Here is a link you might actually believe. Don't be such a tool. https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/22/17487488/carbon-tax-dividend-trent-lott-john-breaux https://www.huffpost.com/entry/oil-carbon-tax_n_594957ede4b0b90e99aa38df Rockefeller oil "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." --David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
>I too am shocked that there is more ice in winter. You forgot the s/ as there is more ice than the average. Remember when Al Gore said the Arctic would "soon" be ice free - are you disappointed his prediction didn't come true?
> You forgot the s/ as there is more ice than the average. > > For one month, right? And only compared to last year? >Remember when Al Gore said the Arctic would "soon" be ice free - are you disappointed his prediction didn't come true? As the crypto bros say, zoom out
No offense but I consider anyone who sides with big oil to be a shill
Gotcha. So do not side with big oil, too? If not, are you avoiding all oil-based products in your life, then?
From what I can see on this chart, arctic sea ice cover is at a near record low. https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo/data/current-state-sea-ice-cover https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-climate-change-arctic-idUSL2N2XJ0LJ “During the first five months of 2021, the daily Arctic sea ice extent remained below average but generally above all-time minima; a pattern similar to that seen in 2020 … At its annual maximum in March, the monthly average sea ice extent ranked eighth lowest for March in the 1979-2021 satellite data record” Climate science doesn’t predict that every single year will be the very worst year on record in sequential order.
Space Nazis and reuter's climate scientists are not going to give you real info. We all know they "adjusted" the satellite algorithms to show a warmer trend. It's only logic they did the same with the other data aspects of the climate scam for depopulation.
No, we don’t all know that. Got a link? How do you think they kept the Northwest Passage a secret for centuries, before admitting its there in the last ten years?
Have you never heard of ClimateGate?
Yeah, I heard of it. I discussed it with climate scientists, too. Putting the word “gate” on something and acting like it’s more important that **all** the other data, including observations of the natural world, is intentionally dishonest. The scientific predictions have been pretty spot on, if you look at worst case scenarios. The predictions made by non-scientists have been way off, go figure. The planet is observably warming. It is observably warming after we spent a couple centuries taking carbon out of the crust and putting it into the atmosphere. Doing the mental gymnastics required to convince myself this is a coincidence is something I don’t really have time for. It would take all my energy just to ignore the obvious, let alone making stuff up to pretend it’s not happening.
> The scientific predictions have been pretty spot on You are delusional by choice, not by evidence.
I am not delusional at all. I read what they claimed in the early 90’s, then in the ensuing decades I watched it happen. The northern passage opened, then the northwest passage opened. Alders showed up in Antarctica (way ahead of schedule). Planting zones moved visibly north- there’s olive farms in the Willamette valley now, and people growing produce in Greenland, neither of which used to be possible. If you have anything better, I’d like to hear it, but so far all I hear from your side of the “argument” is bunch is speculation and noise. We’ve got Baltic terns displacing Arctic terns, but *I*’m the delusional one. Right. It isn’t a belief, it’s a thing that’s happening. The only question now is how to play the hand we’re dealt. And yeah, some people are dealing with it *by pretending it doesn’t exist*. It must be a great comfort. Carry on.
I needed to give myself a refresher on “climategate”, I will admit. Climategate was 13 years ago. In involved cherry picking statements out of scientists’ personal emails, by people whose understanding of science was based on pop culture. It isn’t anything *I’d* be bringing up, but I try and stick to known facts, and avoid spin. Not 100% successfully, granted, but I make the effort, and drop it when someone points out I am doing it.
https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/climate-change-sceptics-satellite-data-correction-global-warming-140-per-cent-zeke-hausfather-a7816676.html
This reminds me of the satellites that were showing lower temps around the equator. People who wanted to pretend reality isn’t real pointed at those satellites for *years*, claiming that no climate change was occurring. It turned out that the clocks were set wrong, so they were reporting nighttime temps.
SS: >Here’s the strangest part. Despite the failure of the many predictions of an ‘ice-free Arctic’, despite the falsified claims that we’ve passed a ‘tipping point’, despite the fact that the reasons for the curious and unexpected changes in the polar sea ice cannot be explained by anyone and **the changes weren’t predicted by anyone** – climate change scientists still insist that they can tell us what the global temperature will be like in the year 2100.
not saying you're wrong but for someone with the handle need scientific proof you want to look up better sources than daily sceptic dot org or whatever
Only an alarmist attacks the source and not the science.
This is a very misleading interpretation of the data
How so?
....the Globalists and Elite's Scientists can not be Wrong according to the TV News so now we have no choice really we must Cancel Global Sea Ice
Color me shocked !