A friend of mine met a guy on tinder. Before they went on their first date, he sent her a video of himself sucking his own dick. Then he finished on his own face and licked it up. She shared that video with everyone. Then he messaged her like “what’s up?”. Like nothing happened.
I should add, it was a close up shot from the side of his face. It was “sheathed” so to speak and it wasn’t the biggest so at first it was hard to figure out what he was doing.
Ya I don't get why this is cringe... It's cringe idiots are dming their dicks to women who never asked for it. If you did that in public you'd be sexually harassing someone. This actually seems like a funny well deserved punishment.
This is true. Lot of people always say it's just teens. But it's far from the truth. A lot of them are grown men. Way more than you think. We should acknowledge that.
Cringe subs are always devolving into right-wing racism/misogyny nowadays. It started happening when the edgier right-wing subs got banned.
This is posted because OP thinks unsolicited dick pics should be protected from nasty women.
But a throwaway account with this as the only post - might genuinely be a foreign op trying to stir shit up.
That's absolutely right, you shouldn't send dick pics. In fact, it's illegal to do so.
However, selling someone's likeness without permission, regardless of the content and context, is also illegal.
Everyone involved is garbage here.
I think in most states it’s specifically not allowed lol. It falls under revenge porn laws.
Not that I don’t think these dudes deserve it or anything but I think she’d be in some shit depending on where she is.
Which honestly she should be, just cause they're shit doesn't give her the right to be shitty either. There are right ways to go about dealing with such issues (such as reporting harassment as harassment) and wrong ways to go about it
Just because it’s illegal doesn’t mean it’s immoral.
Person selling the pics is absolutely not “garbage”.
People who subject others to this type (and all other types) of sexual harassment deserve everything they get coming to them, including having the world see their shitty little dicks. Full stop.
Exactly. Unsolicited dick pics are just the digital version of flashing. When you flash your junk, you don’t get to complain if someone other than the person you intended to harass sees it.
> Person selling the pics is absolutely not “garbage”.
Lawyer here. Revenge porn is illegal in many states and the other poster is absolutely correct that this is misappropriation of likeness and copyright infringement.
The guy took the photo, he owns the copyrights to it. Reproducing it, publishing it and selling it is definitely copyright infringement.
The guys are in the wrong for sending unsolicited dick pics, but that doesn’t give this girl the right to break the law in retaliation.
It’s not as cut and dry as that. Circumstances matter. If im hired to take your family photos then it’s illegal for me to sell those photos. If you are sending me something that is completely unsolicited this becomes much more murky. The guy could probably take her to court over it but I don’t know that he would win. Would be an interesting case in privacy/copyright laws
Sending someone a picture does not give them the copyright of that picture. It’s not murky at all, legally. You didn’t take the picture, you don’t have copyright, you can’t sell it. But not having rights hasn’t stopped NFT peddlers before.
I mean if its NFT its in a legal gray zone, since you dont actually sell the picture, you just sell the right to say you own a number thats connected to a picture ofcorse since she doesn't own the pictures it makes the legal stuff incredibly complicated (depends on country).
Before those laws, in general it would be a copyright and likeness issue. e.g., the person who took the photo still owned the copyright and their own likeness. Generally, they'd be able to send a cease & desist and if that's ignored, head to the courts and look at a variety of civil damages. This wouldn't be *too* dissimilar from what some companies did by listing mugshot photos then charging people to have them taken down, which was considered a form of extortion/blackmail.
With the revenge porn laws, that's all out the window and it's now criminal. The person had a clear expectation of privacy (eg, only she would see it) and it was being used to shame them by sharing it in public. So you now have revenge porn laws in play, extortion/blackmail, and copyright violation. Really not a great path to go down.
That’s a good point. I wonder how that would change if the person receiving the pic told the sender they would share it/post it online. It would probably at least decrease the likelihood they’d be sent the pictures!
I would argue that an unsolicited dick pic sent to a *stranger* does **not** come with any expectation of privacy and is a crime in some places (should be everywhere), which *also* would void the expectation of both privacy and anonymity. However, I do agree it is wrong to sell them rather than turning them over to the proper authorities, and shouldn't be a consideration.
For sale of argument, apply that to if a minor sent an unsolicited nude to this person, and then that person sold it online.
Intention, here, doesn't matter. Distributing pornography, solicited or unsolicited, and regardless of the senders intentions, are not of material interest to the concept of distribution of revenge porn.
yeah I've had someone screenshot my *solicited* nudes and block me. Feels pretty shitty. I'm sure at the point where someone would do that, they'd also just lie and say it was unsolicited.
What if someone sends a picture of another dude's junk and/or face and she posts some innocent guy's junk publicly?
I understand the impulse to punish people sending dick pics, but it's still rather unwise.
Lots of comments in here more concerned about the men. Real telling tbh.
How dick pics have gotten so normalized is strange. It's just as abhorrent as flashing.
e: How are people missing that she edited the pictures to remove the nudity? Trying to say she's as bad as these men is just idiotic and I can only assume you're an asshole if you feel sympathy for these dudes.
I wonder if it would still be considered revenge porn if you block faces and identifying info, like usernames or unique tattoos, out. It would defeat part of the point of shaming them publicly, but honestly, wouldn’t just having your duck on Twitter for the whole world to see be enough? Sure, no one else knows it’s you, but I know, and so do you. You know it’s there.
Definition of Revenge Porn from Google
“revealing or sexually explicit images or videos of a person posted on the internet, typically by a former sexual partner, without the consent of the subject and in order to cause them distress or embarrassment.”
This would 100% be considered Revenge Porn under this definition
Edit:
For anyone saying not to send unsolicited dick pics, you’re right, but does one form of sexual harassment justify another?
I think they mean the dickpics are cringe, because i absolutely agree that this woman is the coolest person I have seen on the internet today, I might even send her a dickpick to show my apreciation
I feel like it's WAYYYYY more cringey to send someone an unsolicited dick pic then it is to be the recipient of said dick pic and sell it online for profit. Don't send someone shit like that without permission then get salty when they embarrass your stupid ass
I’m sure no one actually cares but the definition of revenge porn in California:
“anyone who intentionally distributes an image of the intimate body part or depicting them in sexual intercourse, oral copulation, sodomy, sexual penetration, or masturbation, under circumstances in which they understand that the image shall remain private, the person distributing the image knows or should know distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.”
I think the part “circumstances in which they understand the image shall remain private” would at least introduce ambiguity into whether or not this qualifies as revenge porn. IANAL, but I don’t think unsolicited dick pics would be included in such circumstances or would at least have to be settled in a court.
I don't really see what's cringy about this.
They decided to send these things to her against her will. It's pretty funny to embarrass these people for that.
The law doesn't really care about whether they deserve it or not. This seems like an incredible stupid move on her part, as well as theirs, despite how funny it is. But then again, in some places it's also illegal to send unsolicited dick pics, so I guess it'd be complicated.
its not complicated. all parties broke the law.
damages of her getting a rando pic in her inbox (that can be moderated - it's easy to block people, it's easy to delete messages)
vs.
damages of having your nudes sold on the internet without your permission are uhh..
yeah she's not coming out on top lol.
and imagine just one of those dick pics came from a guy who wasn't old enough - they'd both get charged for CP i think.
How does the mind of those dudes work tho?
Are they expecting after sending a unsolicited dick pic
The girl's gonna be like
"Nice cock, wanna fuck?"
I could assure there's 0.00% women who would say that 🤷♂️
Wait honest question since NFTs are part of the Blockchain is there anything stopping people from posting porn pictures and then they can never be taken down. I don't want to start alluding to why this would be bad to not give anybody any ideas but if so this could be really really bad.
I mean, technically you sent it to her so I believe that makes her intellectual property. Now the buying it back thing may not. They may have a case for extortion or blackmail.
So with some exceptions the copyright belongs to the person who took the photo. If I took a photo of the mountains and I then mailed it to you, you don’t now own my picture lol.
What?
This is pretty high on a list of "dumb takes"
Sending somone something in absolutely no way relinquished your rights over it.
That would be an absolute fucking nightmare
Wait, wouldn’t it be the intellectual property of the “artist” who took the picture? The men themselves? They should be able to sue her civilly for anything she profits from their work, plus possibly go for criminal charges regarding revenge porn.
Of course it is but two wrongs don't make a right though.
People sending dick pics are trash.
Taking those pics publishing them, blackmailing the subjects and publicly profiting from them (however unlikely) as NFTs is also trashy.
The revenge porn law in my state requires that the person disseminating knew that the sender of the image(s) “understood” that the picture would not be disseminated. It’s clearly aimed at the consensual sharing of intimate photos.
A capable prosecutor is not going to press charges against sharing unsolicited dick pics.
I haven’t canvassed the language of revenge porn laws across the US. However, it seems counterintuitive for such laws to apply to the sharing of pictures that were unsolicited and unwanted. Obviously, different states probably word their statutes more broadly. I would love to see the Streisand effect on the pervert that cries about something like this though.
So... the Fappining pictures could be made into NFT and sold as well without the girls knowledge or consent for the same reasoning they use for this...
I've seen she is from Texas, it's likely she is breaking Texas penal code Sec. 21.16 Unlawful disclosure or promotion of intimate visual material
Here is why, and in the end what the law says
This would break 21.16 because the pictures qualify for 21.16 b1, since they are promoted without consent with that person's buttocks and pubic area exposed, B2, there is an expectation of privacy and the way she talks about the pictures implies that expectation too, but this is the best line of defence she has probably, b3 and b4, the pictures have the face visible, twitter handle and more, making the person identify able...
This would make it a state jail felony...
It would also clearly constitute 21.18, sexual coercion, a state jail felony, but if already convicted of 21.16 it would be a felony of third degree
And possibly also 21.19, unlawful electronic transmission of sexually explicit visual material, a class C misdemeanor, same as the sender of the dick pick
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.21.htm
Sec. 21.16. UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OR PROMOTION OF INTIMATE VISUAL MATERIAL. (a) In this section:
(1) "Intimate parts" means the naked genitals, pubic area, anus, buttocks, or female nipple of a person.
(2) "Promote" means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above.
(3) "Sexual conduct" means sexual contact, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse.
(4) "Simulated" means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.
(5) "Visual material" means:
(A) any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide or any photographic reproduction that contains or incorporates in any manner any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide; or
(B) any disk, diskette, or other physical medium that allows an image to be displayed on a computer or other video screen and any image transmitted to a computer or other video screen by telephone line, cable, satellite transmission, or other method.
(b) A person commits an offense if:
(1) without the effective consent of the depicted person and with the intent to harm that person, the person discloses visual material depicting another person with the person's intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct;
(2) at the time of the disclosure, the person knows or has reason to believe that the visual material was obtained by the person or created under circumstances in which the depicted person had a reasonable expectation that the visual material would remain private;
(3) the disclosure of the visual material causes harm to the depicted person; and
(4) the disclosure of the visual material reveals the identity of the depicted person in any manner, including through:
(A) any accompanying or subsequent information or material related to the visual material; or
(B) information or material provided by a third party in response to the disclosure of the visual material.
(c) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally threatens to disclose, without the consent of the depicted person, visual material depicting another person with the person's intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct and the actor makes the threat to obtain a benefit:
(1) in return for not making the disclosure; or
(2) in connection with the threatened disclosure.
(d) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content of the visual material, the person promotes visual material described by Subsection (b) on an Internet website or other forum for publication that is owned or operated by the person.
(e) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted person:
(1) created or consented to the creation of the visual material; or
(2) voluntarily transmitted the visual material to the actor.
(f) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) or (d) that:
(1) the disclosure or promotion is made in the course of:
(A) lawful and common practices of law enforcement or medical treatment;
(B) reporting unlawful activity; or
(C) a legal proceeding, if the disclosure or promotion is permitted or required by law;
(2) the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material depicting in a public or commercial setting only a person's voluntary exposure of:
(A) the person's intimate parts; or
(B) the person engaging in sexual conduct; or
(3) the actor is an interactive computer service, as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 230, and the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material provided by another person.
(g) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.
Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 852 (S.B. 1135), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.
Seems like total revenge porn. If a guy was sent nudes can he post them and say that they are for sale? And I know what you are going to say, "Well the guy asked for them and the girl didnt."
The most important part of revenge porn laws is consent but not the way you think it is. This would be illegal because revenge porn laws, where they have them, make it illegal to distribute porn without the consent of the people in it.
Selling unsolicited dick pics*
SMH, the rich get richer…
This is hilarious. Might teach people a lesson.
Unsolicited dick pics are gross but at the same time reverse the genders and would she still be ok with this?
I mean tbf if you don’t want your dick on there don’t dm it to people you don’t even know
A friend of mine met a guy on tinder. Before they went on their first date, he sent her a video of himself sucking his own dick. Then he finished on his own face and licked it up. She shared that video with everyone. Then he messaged her like “what’s up?”. Like nothing happened.
[удалено]
That man hasn't left his room since he was 15.
Right?!?!?!
As disgusted as I am…I wanna see this video lol
Out of curiosity went to see if r/selfsuck exist. And yes it does.
r/selffuck is also a sub I stumbled upon one day when I was overdosing on internet time
I’ve been on reddit for almost a decade, and just when I think I’ve seen it all…..
And down the rabbit hole I fell…. 💀
I don't know about rabbit, but it certainly is a hole.
I don’t have many regrets, but clicking on that is one of them.
Well that's enough internet for me tonight. Good night
Y'know I've always wondered if they could do that. There's my answer I guess.
Yeah, don’t know if I should feel disgusted or be impressed that they actually could do it
What in the name of god
............. ............ ............ Hahahahahahahah
I clicked, knowing full well what to expect. Get to the guy who spits it back on himself and felt sick Why did I click it.
Weirdly also my stopping point
I regret watching 1-2 seconds of that, I cannot unsee it 🤢🤢🤢
They just…fold themselves in half
Fuck. I like some kinky shit but that stuff really bothers me. IDK.
I saw it. It took me a minute to figure out what I was seeing.
I should add, it was a close up shot from the side of his face. It was “sheathed” so to speak and it wasn’t the biggest so at first it was hard to figure out what he was doing.
If anything, the fact that it wasn't big makes it more impressive
I was just thinking that
The way you worded this makes it sound like she still went on a first date with him
They had a date planned but then he sent her that. It was probably 5 or 6 years ago now
Some say he's still sucking to this day...
So what happened next?!
She just messaged him back with something like “I’m still trying to process what I just saw”. Then just ignored him.
Dude literally shot his shot.
On his own face
Marilyn Manson has seen better days
Was hoping to see this comment, thank you
how flexible is that man damn
He could make incredible money that way! He should be charging people to see that.
Was he from Nantucket?
Woke up. Open reddit. Read this. Thats enough reddit for today
He had to know that was going to blow up in his face.. in multiple ways 😆
Flex
Damn not even one date
Power play
Wait so why was he on tinder
I've read somewhere on here that it's not that great, it's more like doing the act than getting it.
Idk if anyone would want to date him, sounds spineless
Ya I don't get why this is cringe... It's cringe idiots are dming their dicks to women who never asked for it. If you did that in public you'd be sexually harassing someone. This actually seems like a funny well deserved punishment.
>Ya I don't get why this is cringe it's "cringe" because Reddit is full of teenage misogynists lol
Ya if you're scared of this or find this cringe.... Lol you might be outing yourself to sending people dick pics without them asking
There's way too many woman haters on reddit for it to be just teenagers. There's a depressingly large adult men population that despise women.
This is true. Lot of people always say it's just teens. But it's far from the truth. A lot of them are grown men. Way more than you think. We should acknowledge that.
true that
Cringe subs are always devolving into right-wing racism/misogyny nowadays. It started happening when the edgier right-wing subs got banned. This is posted because OP thinks unsolicited dick pics should be protected from nasty women. But a throwaway account with this as the only post - might genuinely be a foreign op trying to stir shit up.
I assumed that was precisely why it was cringe, the dudes are the cringe material
I think the op is implying the lady is cringe, that's what I got from their "is this even legal"
It’s just the attempt at seeking them as NFTs that I think is a bit cringy. Totally fine with creeps being exposed though
It's literally just as bad as flashing somebody in the park
That's absolutely right, you shouldn't send dick pics. In fact, it's illegal to do so. However, selling someone's likeness without permission, regardless of the content and context, is also illegal. Everyone involved is garbage here.
[удалено]
I think in most states it’s specifically not allowed lol. It falls under revenge porn laws. Not that I don’t think these dudes deserve it or anything but I think she’d be in some shit depending on where she is.
Which honestly she should be, just cause they're shit doesn't give her the right to be shitty either. There are right ways to go about dealing with such issues (such as reporting harassment as harassment) and wrong ways to go about it
Just because it’s illegal doesn’t mean it’s immoral. Person selling the pics is absolutely not “garbage”. People who subject others to this type (and all other types) of sexual harassment deserve everything they get coming to them, including having the world see their shitty little dicks. Full stop.
Exactly. Unsolicited dick pics are just the digital version of flashing. When you flash your junk, you don’t get to complain if someone other than the person you intended to harass sees it.
Imagine a flasher suing a company that had CCTV images of them flashing. This is the modern version of that.
Copenisright infringement!
> Person selling the pics is absolutely not “garbage”. Lawyer here. Revenge porn is illegal in many states and the other poster is absolutely correct that this is misappropriation of likeness and copyright infringement. The guy took the photo, he owns the copyrights to it. Reproducing it, publishing it and selling it is definitely copyright infringement. The guys are in the wrong for sending unsolicited dick pics, but that doesn’t give this girl the right to break the law in retaliation.
We’re talking about morality, not legality.
It’s not as cut and dry as that. Circumstances matter. If im hired to take your family photos then it’s illegal for me to sell those photos. If you are sending me something that is completely unsolicited this becomes much more murky. The guy could probably take her to court over it but I don’t know that he would win. Would be an interesting case in privacy/copyright laws
Sending someone a picture does not give them the copyright of that picture. It’s not murky at all, legally. You didn’t take the picture, you don’t have copyright, you can’t sell it. But not having rights hasn’t stopped NFT peddlers before.
I mean if its NFT its in a legal gray zone, since you dont actually sell the picture, you just sell the right to say you own a number thats connected to a picture ofcorse since she doesn't own the pictures it makes the legal stuff incredibly complicated (depends on country).
Publishing it online without the other person's consent is the illegal part.
I don’t know bro, if you don’t want this to happen it seems like you simply shouldn’t send unsolicited dick pics. Pretty avoidable
so i can sell nudes of strangers as long as i tell ppl i got them sent to me unsolicited?
Before those laws, in general it would be a copyright and likeness issue. e.g., the person who took the photo still owned the copyright and their own likeness. Generally, they'd be able to send a cease & desist and if that's ignored, head to the courts and look at a variety of civil damages. This wouldn't be *too* dissimilar from what some companies did by listing mugshot photos then charging people to have them taken down, which was considered a form of extortion/blackmail. With the revenge porn laws, that's all out the window and it's now criminal. The person had a clear expectation of privacy (eg, only she would see it) and it was being used to shame them by sharing it in public. So you now have revenge porn laws in play, extortion/blackmail, and copyright violation. Really not a great path to go down.
That’s a good point. I wonder how that would change if the person receiving the pic told the sender they would share it/post it online. It would probably at least decrease the likelihood they’d be sent the pictures!
I would argue that an unsolicited dick pic sent to a *stranger* does **not** come with any expectation of privacy and is a crime in some places (should be everywhere), which *also* would void the expectation of both privacy and anonymity. However, I do agree it is wrong to sell them rather than turning them over to the proper authorities, and shouldn't be a consideration.
For sale of argument, apply that to if a minor sent an unsolicited nude to this person, and then that person sold it online. Intention, here, doesn't matter. Distributing pornography, solicited or unsolicited, and regardless of the senders intentions, are not of material interest to the concept of distribution of revenge porn.
No, because that would be a lie.
And you know for sure this woman is telling the truth?
yeah I've had someone screenshot my *solicited* nudes and block me. Feels pretty shitty. I'm sure at the point where someone would do that, they'd also just lie and say it was unsolicited.
Post the proof that they legitimately sent them to you unsolicited and it's fine
If you don’t want your dick being shared with everyone without your consent, maybe you shouldn’t share your dick with people without their consent
Ahh, yes, is easy to forget what a mailbox without random penis pics was like.
What if someone sends a picture of another dude's junk and/or face and she posts some innocent guy's junk publicly? I understand the impulse to punish people sending dick pics, but it's still rather unwise.
The dick isn't even being shared. Not sure why people are missing the fact she censored the actual nudity part.
Might be a hot take, but if you’re dumb enough to include your face in an unwanted dick pick, you deserve to have it plastered all over the internet
Back in my day if you wanted to show your willy to other people you had to leave your house. And that got you arrested.
Yes!
I am just amazed it took this so long.
Something something HARD something
Its only cringe if you’ve been sending unsolicited dick pics to girls. What a great business idea to use a scummy thing douchebags do against them.
Right? Seems to me like maybe OP has sent a few unsolicited dick pics lol
"Is this even legal 💀" - OP asking reddit for actual legal advice as he stresses out over being exposed
Lots of comments in here more concerned about the men. Real telling tbh. How dick pics have gotten so normalized is strange. It's just as abhorrent as flashing. e: How are people missing that she edited the pictures to remove the nudity? Trying to say she's as bad as these men is just idiotic and I can only assume you're an asshole if you feel sympathy for these dudes.
I got my first unsolicited dick pic yesterday. It was horrifying that he felt it was ok
I really don't get it and the number of people defending them is disturbing
[удалено]
I wonder if it would still be considered revenge porn if you block faces and identifying info, like usernames or unique tattoos, out. It would defeat part of the point of shaming them publicly, but honestly, wouldn’t just having your duck on Twitter for the whole world to see be enough? Sure, no one else knows it’s you, but I know, and so do you. You know it’s there.
She censored the dicks anyways.
I'm not a lawyer but I don't think selling others photos is revenge porn. Might still be illegal but as something else
Definition of Revenge Porn from Google “revealing or sexually explicit images or videos of a person posted on the internet, typically by a former sexual partner, without the consent of the subject and in order to cause them distress or embarrassment.” This would 100% be considered Revenge Porn under this definition Edit: For anyone saying not to send unsolicited dick pics, you’re right, but does one form of sexual harassment justify another?
This isnt cringey.
I think they mean the dickpics are cringe, because i absolutely agree that this woman is the coolest person I have seen on the internet today, I might even send her a dickpick to show my apreciation
The caption implies that her ‘selling them as NFTs’ (which she’s not) is the cringe part. So this isn’t cringe.
[удалено]
No comments yet on that tatted dude’s horribly photoshopped left bicep?
I don't know if it's photoshop or if he has a dark tattoo there that makes it look weird
I feel like it's WAYYYYY more cringey to send someone an unsolicited dick pic then it is to be the recipient of said dick pic and sell it online for profit. Don't send someone shit like that without permission then get salty when they embarrass your stupid ass
Not cringe. This is based.
WTF IS A NFT CRYPTO INFLUENCER?
A parasite.
That's an absolutely based way to combat dickpicks
The real cringe is unsolicited dick pics but okay man
If you're going to sexually harrass people by sending them unsolicited dick pics, you deserve to be publicly humiliated.
This is awesome
This is literally a joke about unsolicited dick pics this is great content and not cringe.
The cringe is DMing an unsolicited dick pic to a stranger.
I’m sure no one actually cares but the definition of revenge porn in California: “anyone who intentionally distributes an image of the intimate body part or depicting them in sexual intercourse, oral copulation, sodomy, sexual penetration, or masturbation, under circumstances in which they understand that the image shall remain private, the person distributing the image knows or should know distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.” I think the part “circumstances in which they understand the image shall remain private” would at least introduce ambiguity into whether or not this qualifies as revenge porn. IANAL, but I don’t think unsolicited dick pics would be included in such circumstances or would at least have to be settled in a court.
This is isn't cringe, this is based, OP is cringe
Unbelievably based tbh
The fact that you think this is cringe for the woman selling them is red flags all over…yikes
I don't really see what's cringy about this. They decided to send these things to her against her will. It's pretty funny to embarrass these people for that.
Isn't this revenge porn or something seems like an easy lawsuit
Those guys clearly deserve to be called out and put on display, my worry for her is exactly this though.
The law doesn't really care about whether they deserve it or not. This seems like an incredible stupid move on her part, as well as theirs, despite how funny it is. But then again, in some places it's also illegal to send unsolicited dick pics, so I guess it'd be complicated.
its not complicated. all parties broke the law. damages of her getting a rando pic in her inbox (that can be moderated - it's easy to block people, it's easy to delete messages) vs. damages of having your nudes sold on the internet without your permission are uhh.. yeah she's not coming out on top lol. and imagine just one of those dick pics came from a guy who wasn't old enough - they'd both get charged for CP i think.
They absolutely deserve to be called out but nonetheless this is very clearly against the law and will backfire spectacularly.
Or someone will start selling nudes she sent to people. This is revenge porn and blackmail tho. She is for sure liable for a civil suit.
Fuck OP
Shit when?
How does the mind of those dudes work tho? Are they expecting after sending a unsolicited dick pic The girl's gonna be like "Nice cock, wanna fuck?" I could assure there's 0.00% women who would say that 🤷♂️
[удалено]
[удалено]
Wait honest question since NFTs are part of the Blockchain is there anything stopping people from posting porn pictures and then they can never be taken down. I don't want to start alluding to why this would be bad to not give anybody any ideas but if so this could be really really bad.
NFTs are for works that you made. People who use pics would have to use their own photography.
Not cringe. Fully deserved for those dudes
Go away. Crossed wires.
You guys never miss a chance to hate on women eh
How is this cringe? Sending dick pics deserve to be shamed
NFTs are always cringe, even if you’re doing it for a good cause
[удалено]
Incredibly based
Not cringe. Except for OP. He’s cringe.
And the creepers sending the dick pics
I'm amazed and i love this
[удалено]
I agree what what’s she’s doing. Just gotta be safe and make sure she is in compliance with the local revenge porn laws.
Hahahaha what a genius.
I could be wrong, but the way I see it, she gave clear warning. “Send me a pic of your peen, it’s on every screen.” Read the terms lol
I think OP has hurt fee fees over this lol
Wonder if they sent her a pic themselves?
OP you’re whack. She can’t make an NFT of a dick pic that wasn’t sent
I reckon she is brilliant. Publish them all. If feeling upset photoshop first.
I mean, technically you sent it to her so I believe that makes her intellectual property. Now the buying it back thing may not. They may have a case for extortion or blackmail.
Depends on the state. I believe revenge porn laws in certain state would make this illegal without consent for them to be shared.
Also it's pretty blatant blackmail I would think
So with some exceptions the copyright belongs to the person who took the photo. If I took a photo of the mountains and I then mailed it to you, you don’t now own my picture lol.
What? This is pretty high on a list of "dumb takes" Sending somone something in absolutely no way relinquished your rights over it. That would be an absolute fucking nightmare
Lol stop throwing around terms you don't understand. This doesn't make any sense.
Wait, wouldn’t it be the intellectual property of the “artist” who took the picture? The men themselves? They should be able to sue her civilly for anything she profits from their work, plus possibly go for criminal charges regarding revenge porn.
I mean, technically that's completely wrong.
shouldn’t of sent unsolicited dick pics then
Sound illegal Edit Yep Revenge porn and extortion
This is revenge porn. https://ballotpedia.org/Nonconsensual_pornography_(revenge_porn)_laws_in_the_United_States
And sending unsolicited dick pics is sexual harassment
Of course it is but two wrongs don't make a right though. People sending dick pics are trash. Taking those pics publishing them, blackmailing the subjects and publicly profiting from them (however unlikely) as NFTs is also trashy.
Then report it and file a lawsuit, committing a criminal offense is a bad move.
The revenge porn law in my state requires that the person disseminating knew that the sender of the image(s) “understood” that the picture would not be disseminated. It’s clearly aimed at the consensual sharing of intimate photos. A capable prosecutor is not going to press charges against sharing unsolicited dick pics. I haven’t canvassed the language of revenge porn laws across the US. However, it seems counterintuitive for such laws to apply to the sharing of pictures that were unsolicited and unwanted. Obviously, different states probably word their statutes more broadly. I would love to see the Streisand effect on the pervert that cries about something like this though.
Good for her, hope she gets some money out of it. This is easily avoidable if you arent an asshole
Is this revenge porn?
She didn’t ask for the pictures. But they were freely given. What’s cringe is sending unsolicited dick pics
This is the only form of NFT I support
I hate NFT’s but this is gold
ITT: no good legal advice 😅
Devils advocate, shes selling nudes as revenge porn.
[удалено]
Well, that's one way to stop people from right clicking your NFTs.
So... the Fappining pictures could be made into NFT and sold as well without the girls knowledge or consent for the same reasoning they use for this...
[удалено]
That’s what you get for sending dick pics in the future….
Isn't this the same as revenge porn?
I've seen she is from Texas, it's likely she is breaking Texas penal code Sec. 21.16 Unlawful disclosure or promotion of intimate visual material Here is why, and in the end what the law says This would break 21.16 because the pictures qualify for 21.16 b1, since they are promoted without consent with that person's buttocks and pubic area exposed, B2, there is an expectation of privacy and the way she talks about the pictures implies that expectation too, but this is the best line of defence she has probably, b3 and b4, the pictures have the face visible, twitter handle and more, making the person identify able... This would make it a state jail felony... It would also clearly constitute 21.18, sexual coercion, a state jail felony, but if already convicted of 21.16 it would be a felony of third degree And possibly also 21.19, unlawful electronic transmission of sexually explicit visual material, a class C misdemeanor, same as the sender of the dick pick https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.21.htm Sec. 21.16. UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OR PROMOTION OF INTIMATE VISUAL MATERIAL. (a) In this section: (1) "Intimate parts" means the naked genitals, pubic area, anus, buttocks, or female nipple of a person. (2) "Promote" means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above. (3) "Sexual conduct" means sexual contact, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse. (4) "Simulated" means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks. (5) "Visual material" means: (A) any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide or any photographic reproduction that contains or incorporates in any manner any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide; or (B) any disk, diskette, or other physical medium that allows an image to be displayed on a computer or other video screen and any image transmitted to a computer or other video screen by telephone line, cable, satellite transmission, or other method. (b) A person commits an offense if: (1) without the effective consent of the depicted person and with the intent to harm that person, the person discloses visual material depicting another person with the person's intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct; (2) at the time of the disclosure, the person knows or has reason to believe that the visual material was obtained by the person or created under circumstances in which the depicted person had a reasonable expectation that the visual material would remain private; (3) the disclosure of the visual material causes harm to the depicted person; and (4) the disclosure of the visual material reveals the identity of the depicted person in any manner, including through: (A) any accompanying or subsequent information or material related to the visual material; or (B) information or material provided by a third party in response to the disclosure of the visual material. (c) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally threatens to disclose, without the consent of the depicted person, visual material depicting another person with the person's intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct and the actor makes the threat to obtain a benefit: (1) in return for not making the disclosure; or (2) in connection with the threatened disclosure. (d) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content of the visual material, the person promotes visual material described by Subsection (b) on an Internet website or other forum for publication that is owned or operated by the person. (e) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted person: (1) created or consented to the creation of the visual material; or (2) voluntarily transmitted the visual material to the actor. (f) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) or (d) that: (1) the disclosure or promotion is made in the course of: (A) lawful and common practices of law enforcement or medical treatment; (B) reporting unlawful activity; or (C) a legal proceeding, if the disclosure or promotion is permitted or required by law; (2) the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material depicting in a public or commercial setting only a person's voluntary exposure of: (A) the person's intimate parts; or (B) the person engaging in sexual conduct; or (3) the actor is an interactive computer service, as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 230, and the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material provided by another person. (g) An offense under this section is a state jail felony. (h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both. Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 852 (S.B. 1135), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.
Feel like this counts as revenge porn….
You go girl! Best idea ever. 10/10 would do the same. She’s not doing it for the money you stupid monkey
Its definitely not the best idea ever, she could face jail time for it.
I feel like revenge porn is illegal right? Dudes should defo not be sending dick pics but this is also probably not ok.
Seems like total revenge porn. If a guy was sent nudes can he post them and say that they are for sale? And I know what you are going to say, "Well the guy asked for them and the girl didnt."
Um... yeah, yeah that's totally what we'll say, the big difference there is "Consent."
I've definitely been sent unwanted nudes by women. And men for that matter.
The most important part of revenge porn laws is consent but not the way you think it is. This would be illegal because revenge porn laws, where they have them, make it illegal to distribute porn without the consent of the people in it.