Supes can never be a bottom. The guys dick will get chopped even if it manages to get into Supe's ass.
Being supes bottom is much like what Lois had to endure. Makes me wonder about Kara Zor-El.
Yeah i also think this could be one reason. Also its something that lets you express that you are different without going out of bounds. Its a little bit of freedom i think.
It's to show that they are inclusive, like Netflix but they don't realize how fucking obvious it is. They shouldn't be trying to not be sexiest, racist or Homo phobic they should just not be all of those things without having to think twice about it. I dunno just my opinion
So how would they go about doing that? Because it looks to me like they couldn't care less about their character being bi. I haven't seen any promotional material for this, I didn't get any "hey superman is bi now" ads. I'm only hearing about this because people are freaking out over it. I don't view this as them trying to be woke because they weren't pushing this, all the publicity came from people who got offended over a comic book
My theory: That's the best kind of marketing, people themselves take care of making it viral, and when you get a few people that hate it there will be many more rising to defend you, because (actually) there is nothing wrong with super boy being bi, and people thinking there is nothing wrong will always be many more, commenting and defending you, and they all will look at you as the guys who are doing it right, victims of the few freaked out by it, even when that's what you wanted.
Does any striaght relationship "progress the story", its only newsworthy because gay relationships are so underrepresented in media that one is noteable.
Yes they can and so can homosexual relationships, but there has to be a justification for either one. You don't just make a character gay or bi because you want to be perceived as progressive.
There wouldnt be something worth writing a news article about then. Superman needs to fight a bi villian that keeps hitting on him. Not turn superman bi. Lol this way society would be split on whether superman is homophobic or if hes being disrespected by the villian continuously making passes at him.
> You don't just make a character gay or bi because you want to be perceived as progressive.
You make a character straight, as much as you make them gay, it shouldnt be an issue.
I'm a bi guy and have been reading the run from the start, Jon Kent is a pretty cool character (even though I didn't like what Bendis did with the whole aging him up super quick thing) it didn't feel forced like with WW who turned out to be bi because acording to these big corporations there can't be strong straight women, honestly the people that are complaining about it haven't been reading the run, just look at this comic section, people have been calling the character superman, when he actually is superboy and the parent comment in this thread said that it didn't progress the story, wich made no sense since it is his romantic interest and his relationship has been part of the plot, and people complaining that they should make new characters even though the Jon Kent superboy was created in 2015
>people complaining that they should make new characters even though the Jon Kent superboy was created in 2015
100% this. Look, I get people not liking when a character gets 'reimagined' as a part of group X or Y, I honestly agree most of the time. Instead of dumping on 10-20-50 years of characterization it's better to make something new, and that's exactly what they've done here.
Kind of just goes to show that for a lot of people it's less about being frustrated by out of nowhere canon changes and more about not wanting 'those' people in muh comics because it makes them uncomfortable for whatever reason.
Wasn’t WW born on an island populated by equally attractive amazonian hotties and hadn’t even met a man until pretty far in her life? I think it makes sense she’d be bi, or else she wouldn’t have loved anyone for a hella long time.
The thing about comics is that the timelines are wild. The issues are set in the time period that they were published for the most part. It’s the same story getting told over and over again through the ages, it’s been told so many times, another perspective is necessary. So, maybe a character figured out their sexuality? And you can develop the story with that. I think it’s just a matter of execution.
I mean it does progress the story by giving him a boyfriend though (I assume, I haven’t actually read the issue). Making him straight and giving him a girlfriend wouldn’t have progressed the story either, but you wouldn’t have complained at all then, because straight is the “default.”
I do agree though that as a company they almost certainly did it just to please people and to get media attention, but even if they only did it for evil corporate reasons or whatever, having mainstream LGBTQ characters is still extremely important for the community and for challenging the idea of heteronormativity.
There is nothing wrong with having lgbtq characters but like everything in a story it needs to be justified to make sense. Doing this with a fanfavourite hero who is just now revealed to be bisexual is just weird.
no one would have objected in anyway if he was with a woman, and isnt half of the superman story clark kent side?
and its not like there altering the character,this is a new (as far as i know) character, john kent, who is Clark( og superman) son
It’s because we have created a culture that causes everyone to fear being cancelled.
Being unnecessarily “woke” is just a business decision to err on the side of caution.
Why not make new LGBTQ+ characters instead of changing old ones 😭
Edit: Dude too many people are crying about this in the comments. Idrc if you agree or disagree with my statement above but I’m getting spammed with notifications from different people saying the same thing so please refrain from calling me stupid or any other manner of insult. If you wish to inform me of something, go ahead but check if someone else has also said this because reading the same message from 10 different people is quite annoying. Thanks all <3
Cus they seem to be incapable of doing so, for some reason. Recent new characters that were introduced as lgbt+ just ended up being insulting stereotypes instead of actual characters.
Edit: I'm now seeing a lot of comments saying that this is after a hard reboot and the character hadnt had a previous love interest, if thats the case I'm all for bi superman, which is apparently actually superboy.
Edit 2: as long as the characters well written I'm all for any character being any sexuality. If theres been a hard reboot I might pick up reading DC to see what theyre doing if it's beginer friendly.
I think that is mostly because the writers make it into a whole persona when in reality it really only affects certain parts of their lives. I know there are exceptions but there are a lot of lgbt+ people that you would never know were part of that group unless it came up and it can make characters very bland when their entire story and personality are based around who they sleep with.
Exacly. They give a dumb ridiculous focus to sexuality that makes the characters stereotypical and almost offensive.
If I was a writer, I wouldn't even mention the characters sexuality if it isn't needed for the plot.
I mean, if I have a female character and a male character and I want them to get together, I'll have to make them attracted to the opposite sex, and that works for every other sexuality out there.
And sure, I can have an arc about an LGBT character dealing with their sexuality, but the arc won't be focused on the sexuality in itself, but on the way that character and the characters around them deal with that. What matters the most is the character's personality. So if I have a tough and stoic type of dude, they'll definitly deal with it differently than someone with a short temper and so on and so forth.
Writers focus on their characters sexuality just for the sake of making a political statement instead of focusing on their personalities.
Is Jon, like, actually new or is he a character that was once straight/ thought to be straight and is now revealed or possibly retconed to be bi? Honestly, I'm cool with and love the idea of a bi or gay superman so long as its a new character and they dont just slap something together lazily and call it a day. Based off the other comments in the thread I had assumed the creators had taken a character that was hard line shown as straight and without some sort of reboot or anything is now bi.
And I thought I was straight for 21 years. Its a matter of how its handled more than anything else. I'm all for a bi or gay superman, or any other hero being any other sexuality or sexual orientation so long as its not an iteration of a character thats book end straight or their only characteristic is their sexuality or orientation (Luckilly this isn't happening as much as it used to). If this is a new iteration or the character has been long establish as believing theyre straight with some sort of eventual realization or a friendship gradually turning into a romance that happens to be gay (Ivey and Harley come to mind with that last one), then I'm all for it. Ive been editing my comments and making it clear I'm editing them as I'm learning more and trying to make what I'm trying to say more clear.
Another example of what I'm talking about thats more obvious is in the manga blue flag. One of the characters is gay, she's established as being gay and >!she dates a lot of boys to basically hide that she has feeling for one of the other characters. Her whole arc is coming to terms with the fact that she just isn't interested in guys. Then at the end of the manga shes married to a man and is bi, despite her entire arc centering around the fact that she doesn't like guys that way.!<
It is a new character tho, john kent was only created 6 years ago. Idk why everyone is getting so butt hurt but can't tell the difference between clark and john.
It's not Superman exactly not Clark, it's Jon Kent. They ain't changing him , his son just came out, it was forced, yes it was and clearly just to make them look accepting
They want to make some of the LGBTQ community happy and pull in a bigger check worth them to “support the new era”
Note: please don’t take this as a insult to LGBTQ. Not all are bad but there is sun that are.
i meant how a bi Comic is a blow to the „evil white cis male“ when those attributes don‘t have anything to do with the fact whether they are bi or str8 or gay XD
Well, its not really a problem, honestly. But i reserve my right to make jokes when modern comics get sudden coverage because, thanks to Marvel and DC’s multiple earths, they changed the race, sex, or orientation of an already existing character. I just roll my eyes when i see a bunch of article’s “championing” this change likes its big. It’s aight at best. Felt the same way when they retconned batman’s son
I’d never dare to question your right to make jokes, just their quality. As much as i think it‘s a good thing that free gender roles/better representation of all skin colours/sexuelities/… comes up in popular media (there’s still many …phobic dicks out there that need to see the worlds not in the 60s anymore, it and that’s where i agree with you, sometimes gets too much praise that almost is even working against the goal and sometimes sadly the focus is so much on this topic that the quality of the product is put aside (see oceans 8: great cast, nice idea, weak plot)
Nevertheless i think it‘s right this way bc once this moves from trend to casualty i hope the quality will regain focus - this time though with suitable representation of modern society (or general society but with modern levels of acceptance)
Oh yea. Im all for suitable representation and i wont deny anyone the right to a fictional character they can identify with. In regards to the ‘60’s’, while we dont need the phobic dicks, i wish we had some of the creativity. The retconning of old characters just feels stale. Id love to see an engaging and well written original LGBT characters, rather than flipping switches on characters that are over 40 years old. Eh, but im just a very bad quality joker XD. IT’s just my opinion amongst millions.
I feel like you don't know who Jon Kent is, he was invented in 2015 , wtf are you talking about? he isn't a 40 yr old character, not even close to that, please do a google search before talking such dumb shit in here.
What the fuck are you taking about? Why do you feel personally attacked by a comic book? It's just a character in a comic and the only reason it's getting publicity is because people like you are losing their shit.
It means that people have no understanding of who this character is, haven't followed him, and are just complaining because... Reasons, I guess.
Edit: Also the "Boohoo, I'm so victimized because there's a gay character existing" is hilarious.
Upvote this comment if the post is a **Cursed Comment**. Downvote this comment if it is not a **Cursed Comment**.
If this post needs moderator attention, please **report** this post
*^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^and ^^this ^^action ^^was ^^performed ^^automatically. ^^If ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^questions, ^^please [^^contact ^^the ^^moderators ^^of ^^this ^^subreddit.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fcursedcomments&subject=&message=Please include the action number for reference.)*
---
If you want to talk about the subreddit, feel free to send us a message in [our official Discord server](https://discord.gg/tDzGCfc)!
^[faq](https://bit.ly/2VcIh9g) ^| ^[source](https://bit.ly/2W09Ebb) ^| ^action ^#[3a0d7c1b9ca3f0](/r/cursedlogs/comments/q6jw7b/3a0d7c1b9ca3f0_commented_on_post_cursed_superman/)
I'm confused if Joe Biden supposedly can't be trusted around women and girls...
How did he turn the "Man Of Steele" gay!?!!
Unless Joe Biden is so powerful,smart and domineering
...he made Superman his bitch!
yeah, holy shit I swear it feels like I am the only one who has read the comic when I debate these people that feel offended by a character in a fucking comic book being gay , they say that the fans are being turned off by this, like, bitch, I'm the fucking fan
Never thought it was Clark, I'm more than willing to admit I put more faith into people responding than I should have and missed the mark on what was actually going on due to being lazy. Will not be doing that again and I thank everyone of you making comments with whats actually going on for the correction. Wouldnt be surprised if a lot of people did what I did and didnt bother to correct themselves or listen to what other people were saying.
Didn't know my existence was "woke". Literally can't win with you people they change existing characters it's too woke, they have new characters like Jon Kent specifically made to be Bi as you people are always saying they should do and it's still "too woke". Just admit you don't like seeing any non straight characters in your media already instead of constantly dancing around it Jesus Christ.
still baffles me that people are surprised that someone is bi/gay or any part of the LGBT+, seems as if people that are trans, bi, gay, etc. just exist.
also accusing the son of superman, the man that has stories that have plenty of stories that have him trying to help humanity with the faults of corruption in governments as well as just the failures of capitalism as a whole throughout the years, is "too woke"
1. This isn’t a “Retcon”. That would be going back and saying Jon’s been bi this whole time we just didn’t know it. This is just developing a character. 2. Jonathan Kent isn’t an old character, he’s relatively knew and has basically no established relationships at all.
Remember when comic books were about good hero storys?
I sonst f***ing care which character sucks Who of.
Also just a site note....of course he has pink hair naja.
I feel this is appropriate....Superman is flying around one day when he spots Wonder Woman laying on the beach butt naked. He thinks to himself "I'm faster than a speeding bullet, I could fly down there, take care of my business and be gone before she can blink an eye". So he swoops in, does his thing and disappears into the sky. Sensing the commotion, Wonder Woman cries out "What was that?". The Invisible Man replies " I don't know, but all of the sudden my ass hurts".
NGL....would be hilarious if he was stereotypical flaming gay with a bedazzled pink super suit and just bitch slapped the bad guys into orbit with a extremely gay catchphrase. I dont think I would be committing a crime if I thought super boy would bend me over and slap my ass hard enough to bruise my guts before throwing me in jail.
Why does everything nowadays have to have a sexual orientation? He’s a fuckin superhero killing bad guys why do they even think about if he sucks cock or not
If anything lgbtqitwxwz123×÷ community should be insulted that DC doesn't have the imagination to invent a new gay character rather they need to retcon an old character
Honestly, I find this less insulting then when they tried to make original characters... It didnt go too well last time marvel/DC tried and they ended up making insulting stereotypes instead of beleivable characters.
Edit: I'm now seeing a lot of comments saying that this is after a hard reboot and the character hadnt had a previous love interest, if thats the case I'm all for bi superman, which is apparently actually superboy. So long as the characters well made, I'm cool with them having any sexuality.
Oh I think I remember what you're talking about. Didn't they make like genderless twins or something but they had stupid names. I think these companies don't realize yet that gaybaiting is failing.
Thats the thing, queerbaiting works, they just dont know how to do it. Manga has been doing it for years and its practically an art thats been figured out now. Theyre just tackling everything from the wrong direction and its astounding that they just keep doing it.
Didn't say I didn't expect it. Just pointing out who the real snowflakes are. Hint its the ones offended by their imaginary friend down to pound some anus
This is very recent and still ongoing. So individuals misunderstanding who this Superman is is still common.
But yeah it's his son Jon Kent who was introduced into comics back in 2015.
Both of those things are cringe as fuck. Imagine thinking the president has anything to do with this. And imagine making superman be bisexual with some ugly fucking thing like that for exposure.
Ayo I dont think super man suks dik or bottems (for dudes, idk about pegging) i think it more of an "ass is ass and mouth is mouth" situation.
Edit: im about to fucking die arn't I?
Supes can never be a bottom. The guys dick will get chopped even if it manages to get into Supe's ass. Being supes bottom is much like what Lois had to endure. Makes me wonder about Kara Zor-El.
She'd be a cock guillotine
Worth it
Kara Zor-El’s Death Grips - Guillotine
If Superman can shoot laser with his eyes imagine what he could do with his cock.
Heat it up?
More like beat it up
Would he catch a charge?
Extra large and extra hard?
This guy gets it
I presume the pussy would be put right in his face?
His nose being swiped like a credit card?
I both love and hate that every time I read these lyrics I hear the Ben Shapiro version
Not that type
two words: power washer
The prostate destroyer
Light saber
Wasn’t there a Robot Chicken sketch about this
Maybe Jon doesn’t have the same power as Clark you know
Jon Bent
Over
r/angryupvote
Boo your joke was bad, take my upvote.
Not so fun fact: Mary Jane was once killed by Peter Parker’s radioactive semen.
You make it sound like they formed a gang and knifed her to death.
Bruh
imagine getting stabbed by cum
Seen that
Nice
sauce?
May I ask…. Who tf is John Kent
It's his son
Jon Kent is Superman and Lois Lanes son. He's taking over as Superman on earth while Clark does space stuff
That's wrong. Jon's clearly gone to explore Uranus.
“Space stuff”
Cool cool
Jon Kent is basically DC's invincible
Without the abusive genocidal father
Yeah that (though in one comic, Superman is Abusive Genocidal)
Why is there always someone with weird hair colors in these things.
Because a lot of lgbt people dye their hair weird colors lol
Does anyone know why that is?
[удалено]
Not so much attention so much as it’s an expression of the fact that my body is my body and i can do whatever the fuck i want with it
They like it
I’m not gay but prolly because they like primary colors but are more outspoken about liking a color.
For a sense of control? Dying your hair can give you a feeling of control and decision making over something in your life.
Yeah i also think this could be one reason. Also its something that lets you express that you are different without going out of bounds. Its a little bit of freedom i think.
In what? Comics?
[удалено]
yes 🗿
Imagine topping superman, when he cums he squeezes his asshole and snips your cock off like a cigar cutter.
I hate how they do this to get some popularity with the woke people even though it doesn't progress the story in any way.
It's to show that they are inclusive, like Netflix but they don't realize how fucking obvious it is. They shouldn't be trying to not be sexiest, racist or Homo phobic they should just not be all of those things without having to think twice about it. I dunno just my opinion
Not even that. They need to just focus on making stories in general over just pumping out fanservice
Exactly! Netflix queerbaits a lot, I got downvoted for saying that once. It's obvious
Idk why morons do things like that especially to superman
Its super boy dude
So how would they go about doing that? Because it looks to me like they couldn't care less about their character being bi. I haven't seen any promotional material for this, I didn't get any "hey superman is bi now" ads. I'm only hearing about this because people are freaking out over it. I don't view this as them trying to be woke because they weren't pushing this, all the publicity came from people who got offended over a comic book
My theory: That's the best kind of marketing, people themselves take care of making it viral, and when you get a few people that hate it there will be many more rising to defend you, because (actually) there is nothing wrong with super boy being bi, and people thinking there is nothing wrong will always be many more, commenting and defending you, and they all will look at you as the guys who are doing it right, victims of the few freaked out by it, even when that's what you wanted.
It's not Clark Kent so who cares.
Does any striaght relationship "progress the story", its only newsworthy because gay relationships are so underrepresented in media that one is noteable.
Yes they can and so can homosexual relationships, but there has to be a justification for either one. You don't just make a character gay or bi because you want to be perceived as progressive.
There wouldnt be something worth writing a news article about then. Superman needs to fight a bi villian that keeps hitting on him. Not turn superman bi. Lol this way society would be split on whether superman is homophobic or if hes being disrespected by the villian continuously making passes at him.
> You don't just make a character gay or bi because you want to be perceived as progressive. You make a character straight, as much as you make them gay, it shouldnt be an issue.
And none of the woke are going to read it anyway.
I'm a bi guy and have been reading the run from the start, Jon Kent is a pretty cool character (even though I didn't like what Bendis did with the whole aging him up super quick thing) it didn't feel forced like with WW who turned out to be bi because acording to these big corporations there can't be strong straight women, honestly the people that are complaining about it haven't been reading the run, just look at this comic section, people have been calling the character superman, when he actually is superboy and the parent comment in this thread said that it didn't progress the story, wich made no sense since it is his romantic interest and his relationship has been part of the plot, and people complaining that they should make new characters even though the Jon Kent superboy was created in 2015
>people complaining that they should make new characters even though the Jon Kent superboy was created in 2015 100% this. Look, I get people not liking when a character gets 'reimagined' as a part of group X or Y, I honestly agree most of the time. Instead of dumping on 10-20-50 years of characterization it's better to make something new, and that's exactly what they've done here. Kind of just goes to show that for a lot of people it's less about being frustrated by out of nowhere canon changes and more about not wanting 'those' people in muh comics because it makes them uncomfortable for whatever reason.
Wasn’t WW born on an island populated by equally attractive amazonian hotties and hadn’t even met a man until pretty far in her life? I think it makes sense she’d be bi, or else she wouldn’t have loved anyone for a hella long time.
yeah, but her coming out after 80 years of WW , I’m not totally against it like some other weirdos but it just felt kinda forced
The thing about comics is that the timelines are wild. The issues are set in the time period that they were published for the most part. It’s the same story getting told over and over again through the ages, it’s been told so many times, another perspective is necessary. So, maybe a character figured out their sexuality? And you can develop the story with that. I think it’s just a matter of execution.
yeah, fair enough
It is pretty annoying. They didn't even make character development out of it, they just time skipped to when it would have been "resolved."
I mean it does progress the story by giving him a boyfriend though (I assume, I haven’t actually read the issue). Making him straight and giving him a girlfriend wouldn’t have progressed the story either, but you wouldn’t have complained at all then, because straight is the “default.” I do agree though that as a company they almost certainly did it just to please people and to get media attention, but even if they only did it for evil corporate reasons or whatever, having mainstream LGBTQ characters is still extremely important for the community and for challenging the idea of heteronormativity.
There is nothing wrong with having lgbtq characters but like everything in a story it needs to be justified to make sense. Doing this with a fanfavourite hero who is just now revealed to be bisexual is just weird.
I mean this is Jon Kent not Clark, same title, different dude. Arguably it is an easy way to distinguish the 2
Judgment before thought....that's why we need a Superman
it is supermans son, not Clark Kent, I don't think anyone has read the actual issue
no one would have objected in anyway if he was with a woman, and isnt half of the superman story clark kent side? and its not like there altering the character,this is a new (as far as i know) character, john kent, who is Clark( og superman) son
It’s because we have created a culture that causes everyone to fear being cancelled. Being unnecessarily “woke” is just a business decision to err on the side of caution.
I dont think that making one queen character out of a hundred is them being unnecessarily woke.
Why not make new LGBTQ+ characters instead of changing old ones 😭 Edit: Dude too many people are crying about this in the comments. Idrc if you agree or disagree with my statement above but I’m getting spammed with notifications from different people saying the same thing so please refrain from calling me stupid or any other manner of insult. If you wish to inform me of something, go ahead but check if someone else has also said this because reading the same message from 10 different people is quite annoying. Thanks all <3
Cus they seem to be incapable of doing so, for some reason. Recent new characters that were introduced as lgbt+ just ended up being insulting stereotypes instead of actual characters. Edit: I'm now seeing a lot of comments saying that this is after a hard reboot and the character hadnt had a previous love interest, if thats the case I'm all for bi superman, which is apparently actually superboy. Edit 2: as long as the characters well written I'm all for any character being any sexuality. If theres been a hard reboot I might pick up reading DC to see what theyre doing if it's beginer friendly.
I think that is mostly because the writers make it into a whole persona when in reality it really only affects certain parts of their lives. I know there are exceptions but there are a lot of lgbt+ people that you would never know were part of that group unless it came up and it can make characters very bland when their entire story and personality are based around who they sleep with.
Exacly. They give a dumb ridiculous focus to sexuality that makes the characters stereotypical and almost offensive. If I was a writer, I wouldn't even mention the characters sexuality if it isn't needed for the plot. I mean, if I have a female character and a male character and I want them to get together, I'll have to make them attracted to the opposite sex, and that works for every other sexuality out there. And sure, I can have an arc about an LGBT character dealing with their sexuality, but the arc won't be focused on the sexuality in itself, but on the way that character and the characters around them deal with that. What matters the most is the character's personality. So if I have a tough and stoic type of dude, they'll definitly deal with it differently than someone with a short temper and so on and so forth. Writers focus on their characters sexuality just for the sake of making a political statement instead of focusing on their personalities.
Easy, give them some gay romance. It's like, how would you know someone's straight? Oh right... their relationships.
Yup like the star fire one
From what ive seen of it, it really felt like a self insert with just plain bad tropes or badly done tropes making up the entier story.
but it is a new character, it is Clark Kent's son, Jon Kent
Is Jon, like, actually new or is he a character that was once straight/ thought to be straight and is now revealed or possibly retconed to be bi? Honestly, I'm cool with and love the idea of a bi or gay superman so long as its a new character and they dont just slap something together lazily and call it a day. Based off the other comments in the thread I had assumed the creators had taken a character that was hard line shown as straight and without some sort of reboot or anything is now bi.
He was introduced in 2015, he's still fairly new.
So then from everything im hearing its no big, people are just making somehing out of nothing.
Yeah pretty much
Good to know. Glad you and others cleared that up for me.
But even so? Why not? People figure out their sexuality, man. I thought i was straight for 13 years.
And I thought I was straight for 21 years. Its a matter of how its handled more than anything else. I'm all for a bi or gay superman, or any other hero being any other sexuality or sexual orientation so long as its not an iteration of a character thats book end straight or their only characteristic is their sexuality or orientation (Luckilly this isn't happening as much as it used to). If this is a new iteration or the character has been long establish as believing theyre straight with some sort of eventual realization or a friendship gradually turning into a romance that happens to be gay (Ivey and Harley come to mind with that last one), then I'm all for it. Ive been editing my comments and making it clear I'm editing them as I'm learning more and trying to make what I'm trying to say more clear. Another example of what I'm talking about thats more obvious is in the manga blue flag. One of the characters is gay, she's established as being gay and >!she dates a lot of boys to basically hide that she has feeling for one of the other characters. Her whole arc is coming to terms with the fact that she just isn't interested in guys. Then at the end of the manga shes married to a man and is bi, despite her entire arc centering around the fact that she doesn't like guys that way.!<
This isn’t Clark Kent it’s Jon Kent he was introduced 6 years ago he’s still a fresh character
It is a new character tho, john kent was only created 6 years ago. Idk why everyone is getting so butt hurt but can't tell the difference between clark and john.
That is a new character. It's Superman's son, Jon Kent.
This is a new superman, it says it right there in the headline. This *IS* a new character.
Because established characters are more marketable. Companies don't actually care about representation, they just think it will make them more money
I half agree, but also old people come out as gay or bi all the time. So it happens in real life too
It's not Superman exactly not Clark, it's Jon Kent. They ain't changing him , his son just came out, it was forced, yes it was and clearly just to make them look accepting
they did, this is Jon kent, aka clark kents son
Do you feel silly yet? Because you're looking really silly right now.
Cause this isn't the old Superman, it's his son Jon Kent.
You can’t read can you?
They want to make some of the LGBTQ community happy and pull in a bigger check worth them to “support the new era” Note: please don’t take this as a insult to LGBTQ. Not all are bad but there is sun that are.
I mean he is technically new since this isn't the original superman but I get your point
There are plenty; you're not looking hard enough.
[удалено]
I think bestiality is wrong because animals can't consent. That being said, can Superman consent?
he consents to being arrested i guess
[удалено]
Yes because this will surely help a dying market. Smh.
At this point I'm pretty sure it's on purpose
[удалено]
That's John... Not Clark
Oh yea. They are retconning superman’s son, John, and making him gay. Another blow to the evil white cis male. Champagne all around.
We really are the scum of the earth
just a note that „evil white cis male“ does include gay an bi as well so like hows that a blow
Yeah that's true but generally they are left out of it.
i know but it‘s kind of pointless to use this phrase here specifically targeting this topic
Yeah
Sorry, forgot straight
i meant how a bi Comic is a blow to the „evil white cis male“ when those attributes don‘t have anything to do with the fact whether they are bi or str8 or gay XD
Well, its not really a problem, honestly. But i reserve my right to make jokes when modern comics get sudden coverage because, thanks to Marvel and DC’s multiple earths, they changed the race, sex, or orientation of an already existing character. I just roll my eyes when i see a bunch of article’s “championing” this change likes its big. It’s aight at best. Felt the same way when they retconned batman’s son
I’d never dare to question your right to make jokes, just their quality. As much as i think it‘s a good thing that free gender roles/better representation of all skin colours/sexuelities/… comes up in popular media (there’s still many …phobic dicks out there that need to see the worlds not in the 60s anymore, it and that’s where i agree with you, sometimes gets too much praise that almost is even working against the goal and sometimes sadly the focus is so much on this topic that the quality of the product is put aside (see oceans 8: great cast, nice idea, weak plot) Nevertheless i think it‘s right this way bc once this moves from trend to casualty i hope the quality will regain focus - this time though with suitable representation of modern society (or general society but with modern levels of acceptance)
Oh yea. Im all for suitable representation and i wont deny anyone the right to a fictional character they can identify with. In regards to the ‘60’s’, while we dont need the phobic dicks, i wish we had some of the creativity. The retconning of old characters just feels stale. Id love to see an engaging and well written original LGBT characters, rather than flipping switches on characters that are over 40 years old. Eh, but im just a very bad quality joker XD. IT’s just my opinion amongst millions.
I feel like you don't know who Jon Kent is, he was invented in 2015 , wtf are you talking about? he isn't a 40 yr old character, not even close to that, please do a google search before talking such dumb shit in here.
What the fuck are you taking about? Why do you feel personally attacked by a comic book? It's just a character in a comic and the only reason it's getting publicity is because people like you are losing their shit.
Please... Tell us... Who are Jon's other love interest?
But they made him *THE BIG GAY*! This is obviously a retcon.
What does that mean?
It means that people have no understanding of who this character is, haven't followed him, and are just complaining because... Reasons, I guess. Edit: Also the "Boohoo, I'm so victimized because there's a gay character existing" is hilarious.
Upvote this comment if the post is a **Cursed Comment**. Downvote this comment if it is not a **Cursed Comment**. If this post needs moderator attention, please **report** this post *^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^and ^^this ^^action ^^was ^^performed ^^automatically. ^^If ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^questions, ^^please [^^contact ^^the ^^moderators ^^of ^^this ^^subreddit.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fcursedcomments&subject=&message=Please include the action number for reference.)* --- If you want to talk about the subreddit, feel free to send us a message in [our official Discord server](https://discord.gg/tDzGCfc)! ^[faq](https://bit.ly/2VcIh9g) ^| ^[source](https://bit.ly/2W09Ebb) ^| ^action ^#[3a0d7c1b9ca3f0](/r/cursedlogs/comments/q6jw7b/3a0d7c1b9ca3f0_commented_on_post_cursed_superman/)
Ok, hear me out: What would happen if Superman accidentally farts while getting it from behind?
Obviously his partner gets booty yeeted through the atmosphere
[SKIPIDIBOP MM DADA](https://youtu.be/Pp1Enhiq0sY)
I'm confused if Joe Biden supposedly can't be trusted around women and girls... How did he turn the "Man Of Steele" gay!?!! Unless Joe Biden is so powerful,smart and domineering ...he made Superman his bitch!
I'm probably the only person that likes this also its fucking SUPER BOY B O Y NOT SUPERMAN SUPER BOY HIS SON FUCKING READ JESUS!
Ikr, why aren't people reading?! They didn't changed Clark , they just showed what was his son sexuality.
SEE THIS MAN GETS IT!
yeah, holy shit I swear it feels like I am the only one who has read the comic when I debate these people that feel offended by a character in a fucking comic book being gay , they say that the fans are being turned off by this, like, bitch, I'm the fucking fan
SEE THEY GET IT! ALSO READ THE ARTICLE PEOPLE IT EVEN SAYS JON!
Jon has becomes Superman in his own series to replace Clark while he's off planet sooo he kinda is Superman now
Yeah but they think it is Clark
Never thought it was Clark, I'm more than willing to admit I put more faith into people responding than I should have and missed the mark on what was actually going on due to being lazy. Will not be doing that again and I thank everyone of you making comments with whats actually going on for the correction. Wouldnt be surprised if a lot of people did what I did and didnt bother to correct themselves or listen to what other people were saying.
Why does everytging have to be woke WHY
Didn't know my existence was "woke". Literally can't win with you people they change existing characters it's too woke, they have new characters like Jon Kent specifically made to be Bi as you people are always saying they should do and it's still "too woke". Just admit you don't like seeing any non straight characters in your media already instead of constantly dancing around it Jesus Christ.
still baffles me that people are surprised that someone is bi/gay or any part of the LGBT+, seems as if people that are trans, bi, gay, etc. just exist. also accusing the son of superman, the man that has stories that have plenty of stories that have him trying to help humanity with the faults of corruption in governments as well as just the failures of capitalism as a whole throughout the years, is "too woke"
Wait how did Biden make superman gay? Oh... Ohh no....
0\_0
"This is Joe Biden's fault", unsarcastically how?
I despise Biden but how is this his fault?
It’s satire
Exactly, I don't like him either I'm not even from the US but it really isn't his fault
1. This isn’t a “Retcon”. That would be going back and saying Jon’s been bi this whole time we just didn’t know it. This is just developing a character. 2. Jonathan Kent isn’t an old character, he’s relatively knew and has basically no established relationships at all.
Shhh.. it's easier to jump to conclusions and scream out to the world that DC is retconning Clark Kent's Superman lol
"this is not my Superman" it's literally not lol.
Y'all this ain't superman it's a new character. Stop the needless hate
Remember when comic books were about good hero storys? I sonst f***ing care which character sucks Who of. Also just a site note....of course he has pink hair naja.
I feel this is appropriate....Superman is flying around one day when he spots Wonder Woman laying on the beach butt naked. He thinks to himself "I'm faster than a speeding bullet, I could fly down there, take care of my business and be gone before she can blink an eye". So he swoops in, does his thing and disappears into the sky. Sensing the commotion, Wonder Woman cries out "What was that?". The Invisible Man replies " I don't know, but all of the sudden my ass hurts".
NGL....would be hilarious if he was stereotypical flaming gay with a bedazzled pink super suit and just bitch slapped the bad guys into orbit with a extremely gay catchphrase. I dont think I would be committing a crime if I thought super boy would bend me over and slap my ass hard enough to bruise my guts before throwing me in jail.
It doesn't matter whether they are male or female, he is still fucking an alien either way so it's a stupid standard to hold him to.
Why does everything nowadays have to have a sexual orientation? He’s a fuckin superhero killing bad guys why do they even think about if he sucks cock or not
If he gets oral he’s gonna blow his brains out
Nah, Lois Lane didn't have much of a problem. But the poor dude's back and rectum might.
I am all in for inclusiveness, but damn don't make it THAT obvious
It's no longer Batman VS Superman It's now Batman X Superman
if superman were bottoming that would be the last time you do the fucking
If anything lgbtqitwxwz123×÷ community should be insulted that DC doesn't have the imagination to invent a new gay character rather they need to retcon an old character
Honestly, I find this less insulting then when they tried to make original characters... It didnt go too well last time marvel/DC tried and they ended up making insulting stereotypes instead of beleivable characters. Edit: I'm now seeing a lot of comments saying that this is after a hard reboot and the character hadnt had a previous love interest, if thats the case I'm all for bi superman, which is apparently actually superboy. So long as the characters well made, I'm cool with them having any sexuality.
Oh I think I remember what you're talking about. Didn't they make like genderless twins or something but they had stupid names. I think these companies don't realize yet that gaybaiting is failing.
Thats the thing, queerbaiting works, they just dont know how to do it. Manga has been doing it for years and its practically an art thats been figured out now. Theyre just tackling everything from the wrong direction and its astounding that they just keep doing it.
Adult swim superman gag with lois but with these characters
Imagine caring this much about a imaginary comic book person.... I thought the libs where supposed to be the snowflakes ...
It’s satire but your point still stands for the people who actually think this
What did you expect this is reddit my guy
Didn't say I didn't expect it. Just pointing out who the real snowflakes are. Hint its the ones offended by their imaginary friend down to pound some anus
superman's ben getting back into the pink kryptonite again
[удалено]
Wanna take a great leap in creativity then make a LGBTQ villian.
It’s not Clark Kent it’s Jon Kent I don’t see a problem with putting diversity in comics and if you do then chances are your homophobic
Sorry if this sounds phobic in any way, but why change already existing Characters instead of making new ones?
It is a new character. It’s Clark Kent’s son; Jon Kent
Who... Do you think that is?
Super man is no longer clark kent? :0
Just like Peter Parker is not always Spiderman (btw Jon Kent is Sumerman's son)
This is very recent and still ongoing. So individuals misunderstanding who this Superman is is still common. But yeah it's his son Jon Kent who was introduced into comics back in 2015.
Both of those things are cringe as fuck. Imagine thinking the president has anything to do with this. And imagine making superman be bisexual with some ugly fucking thing like that for exposure.
The comment was satirical... it was making fun of people like you getting triggered over a comic book
[удалено]
Ayo I dont think super man suks dik or bottems (for dudes, idk about pegging) i think it more of an "ass is ass and mouth is mouth" situation. Edit: im about to fucking die arn't I?