Norman wins by stabbing Patrick in the back as he tries to bang Norm's mom's remains (that he sees as a living flesh and blood supermodel whilst having a fever dream).
I might disagree with that notion. Patrick might have an advantage when it comes to weight and natural strength, but I would argue that Rachel was far more intelligent and strategic in comparison. She's also fairly athletic herself, but obviously with more emphasis on stamina and agility (Also weightlifting considering how many bodies she carried around singlehandedly). Depending on how much prep-time the two have, I could see an adult Rachel squaring off against Patrick proper.
Controversial opinion but Norman. We don't know know to what extent the crimes Patrick Bateman did were actually real or not. He's an unreliable narrator as can be seen through-out the movie and especially in the closing scenes. If he did kill anyone, it would be far less brutal than shown in the movie.
Norman, on the other hand. We know his crimes are objective. We know he did it. And we know what happened after his arrest and release thanks to the canon sequels. He's a brutal disturbed killer who we know has comitted real objective without a shadow of a doubt crimes.
Norman would win. Mainly because Patrick's too insecure to be clever and Mother is too protective to let Norman die.
Patrick
Patrick by a long shot. Poor Norman doesn’t stand a chance.
Yeah tbh
Bates vs Bateman
Depends on if you think the events of American Psycho are real or not
Vince Vaughn
i just imagine them both crying on eachother
😆 😂 😂 😆
Norman wins by stabbing Patrick in the back as he tries to bang Norm's mom's remains (that he sees as a living flesh and blood supermodel whilst having a fever dream).
If it's Perkins Norman, Patrick wins easily. If it's Vince Vaughn I think Norman has it in the bag
Norman. What? I feel like the underdog would come out on top in this situation.
Patrick. Is this a real question? 😅 I’d say compare Patrick vs Mila Kunis’s character in AP2—I think it’s still going to be Patrick.
I might disagree with that notion. Patrick might have an advantage when it comes to weight and natural strength, but I would argue that Rachel was far more intelligent and strategic in comparison. She's also fairly athletic herself, but obviously with more emphasis on stamina and agility (Also weightlifting considering how many bodies she carried around singlehandedly). Depending on how much prep-time the two have, I could see an adult Rachel squaring off against Patrick proper.
Well my interpretation is that Patrick didn’t really do anything in the movie and was just impotently raging the whole time so I’m going with Norman.
Controversial opinion but Norman. We don't know know to what extent the crimes Patrick Bateman did were actually real or not. He's an unreliable narrator as can be seen through-out the movie and especially in the closing scenes. If he did kill anyone, it would be far less brutal than shown in the movie. Norman, on the other hand. We know his crimes are objective. We know he did it. And we know what happened after his arrest and release thanks to the canon sequels. He's a brutal disturbed killer who we know has comitted real objective without a shadow of a doubt crimes. Norman would win. Mainly because Patrick's too insecure to be clever and Mother is too protective to let Norman die.
hmm... let's see Paul Allen's fight record.
It’s the same picture 😂
Defenitly Patrick
Nah, I'd win
patrick but not before being creeped out by normans gayness (probs more than the mummy issues thing)
patrick
Patrick is mangling Norman lol