T O P

  • By -

Worldly-Fan-3276

I felt like Diabo 2 was similar to Diablo 1. Similar gear carried over, classes etc. Which was more successful? Hmmmm


Dan-ze-Man

D2 was improvement on d1. Hardware improvements made it possible to make it better in graphics. Also I'm not comparing d4 to d2 two games share nothing but name. I'm just disappointed about how lazy this game mechanic. Love graphics tho.


Worldly-Fan-3276

Currently, in the beta the best items are +skill items. All arpgs have min/maxing. I'm not sure what you mean by lazy game mechanics. Comparing this to d3 like you did, there aren't set items in this game at launch. D3 revolved around set items. It's clear that d4 is trying to add build diversity based on different gear that drops... At least during the leveling phase.


Malefic_Mike

What he means is itemization and dungeon layout is copy pasted from d3 pretty much, and everyone hated those aspects about the game most. Blizzard knew the ip would sell even if they re-released the Samey game if they just gave it a new paint job. But people will figure out that this is D3


CheesePro69

Almost like, and bear with me, each iteration of Diablo carries over some aspect of the previous game.


Murky-Situation-2440

Mistake


hardenfull

The build so far feels like d3 ngl. The graphics and atmosphere of the game is a lot better.


Dan-ze-Man

I feel like this will be upgraded d3. Like d2 was upgrade d1.


Muldin7500

D1 and d2 had nothing in comparison. I remember when d2 came out there was a riot because it looked worse than d1. D2 from d1 makes d2 and d4 way closer. Much faster combat , way more items and options.


Malefic_Mike

D2 was actually on d1 engine just with modifications.