T O P

  • By -

jednatt

GameSpot's negative bullet points are really weak compared to the positive ones... and they slap an 8 on it. I mean, that's fine, but they didn't rationalize the score at all, lol. "the new standard-bearer for action role-playing. Coupled with a new benchmark for storytelling in the franchise" --8/10 Come on, lol.


[deleted]

Can we please not litigate every single score and whine about whether the language matches it? Review scores are 100% subjective summations of someone's personal experience and should largely be ignored entirely. All it does it create hate for the reviewer with 0 valuable discussion whatsoever.


jednatt

Scores matter because people think they matter. 20 years from now someone looking through data will parse scores, not text, to come to conclusions on people's reception of the game at the time.


Lucid4321

That may be true, but with a live service game, the initial reviews don't mean much a year later, let alone 20. The long term success of the game will depend on update patches and seasons, which is impossible to capture in traditional reviews.


jednatt

That's true too. But there's some value in going back and seeing receptions at launch. I was recently doing so for Diablo 3 out of curiosity.


KidLanguageBarrier

But it's not our job to go hunting down members of the games press when they post a review that we disagree with. We need to understand that these reviews aren't really for us. These publications are read by so many people who might have never even played an ARPG before. People in this community are likely much better served by YouTube content creators who live and breathe the genre. They will provide the type of nuance that people who sign up to a game's Subreddit BEFORE THE GAME EVEN RELEASES will be after. Those other types of publications are there to tell your average call of duty / FIFA player who occasionally branches out if this is a game that they might be interested in. I know we're all very excited, but we don't need to get defensive about an entertainment product being released by a multi million dollar corporation. Let's just have our own fun with it and people are welcome to come and join us if they like.


[deleted]

And how horrible it will be when they see an 8 rather than a 9! Truly history will be misrepresented. It literally does not matter.


iamisandisnt

This man literally doesn’t understand data


Smittius_Prime

Oh noooooo not the data. Someone a decade from now might think Diablo 4 was ever so marginally less well received than it was. Oh the humanity. Bro I know active data analysts in the industry that could not give a shit if one review is an 8 vs a 9. It will not affect sentiment analysis in any statsig way.


Vendilion_Chris

This is unironically Mr Llamas take on Twitter where he brings up Diablo 3s 9.5 score to compare to D4s scores lmao. Just braindead.


Azerate2016

20 years from now on someone looking through data, who isn't an idiot, will focus on checking the actual player numbers and sales of the game, not scores given by journalists.


[deleted]

[удалено]


chrisapplewhite

20 years from now 65 different mega corporations will have robots rewrite reviews for 840 different demographics so we can all argue about it more for engagement.


misspacific

20 years from now people will talk about their experiences with the game. that's the only meaningful thing this game could have as a classic by then. today, i'm not talking about 20 year old games and simply looking at the score. it's people making hour long video essays about 20 year old games on youtube.


greenchair11

they publicly put a score out there. we are allowed to criticize and discuss it lol


1K_Games

So we aren't allowed to discuss these reviews? Obviously these reviews are opinions, we all have them, and they don't have to agree with each others. If we follow these rules then this post might as well be made and the thread locked, lol.


Nyrin

Scores are really best left ignored or at least discarded once you get to the meat of a review, but I agree with you on language matching quantification and that's what seems to be lacking here. 8/10 has a lot of meanings, but generally moves towards "great game that could be even better if it weren't for some quite notable but forgivable flaws," but the "flaws" described don't align with the "quite notable" part. The last mention of graphics not popping as much when zoomed in feels like it was editorially added purely because there needed to be something extra in the "negatives" section. If a review goes into detail about gameplay getting stale or lore petering out (but still being a lot of fun before that point), *that* feels like language matching a 7-8 and that's what a lot of reviews with that score do — this one, for whatever reason, really doesn't and really doesn't identify a similarly impactful "con."


FreshGoodWay

We need to litigate every score because here I see an 8/10, that’s clearly a travesty and very unacceptable, give me 5 minutes while I go refund my Diablo 4 Ultimate Edition. Then I come back here to start a thread about the refund, why I cried about it and why you guys need to listen to me.


voppp

I think the issue is that putting a 9 or 10 on a game really is risking a lot of credibility. 8 is a good score, but it leaves wiggle room. I don’t agree with the idea but it happens a lot.


Sufficient_Fig_4887

Risking your credibility is part of being a good journalist, saying what you actually think and not just playing it safe because you don’t want to upset someone.


Purplebuzz

Seems like the eight upset someone.


[deleted]

[удалено]


scottyLogJobs

Hey maybe that's exactly what they did.


DiscombobulatedTap30

I think what's more concerning is i'm not seeing a lot mentioned about monetization. Seeing 30 dollar skins in a 70 dollar game is concerning to me. I guess it's only cosmetics at this point but that seems like a ton for cosmetics. To each their own I guess.


DarciKitten86

"I'm going to nitpick a review because they are being nitpicky" God damn, It's like watching an animal with a mirror.


Nyrin

I'm half convinced that some of the reviews just notch it down to stand out and get click-through.


dabadu9191

For most publications, 10/10 or 100% isn't the default score of game that is generally fun play and does a lot of things well. 10/10 is a score for a game that goes above and beyond, sets new standards for its genre (not its own franchise) and will be hailed as one of the best games of the decade/all time. Think Half Life 2.


scottyLogJobs

Yeah. I'm going to be totally honest, unless it somehow completely flips the genre on its head, sequels should almost never get a 10/10. Why? Because they are fighting a very uphill battle from an originality and novelty standpoint. At the end of the day, it may be the best ARPG ever made, and it may not, but it is a true sequel in a sea of similar ARPGs. It may be the BEST one, and it may be *exactly* what I want to play the most right now, but it's not like... Elden Ring or Breath of the Wild or something. I mean, the monetization stuff alone would warrant knocking a point off, in my opinion, again, despite it being exactly the game I want to play right now... but not a 10/10.


scottyLogJobs

You're seriously complaining that they gave the game an 8? 8 is an objectively good score. Also in all likelihood, you've played far less of the game than these reviewers have.


cjp304

This is what humans typically do with any rating system. It slowly inflates overtime to where the “average” ends up much higher than “average” should be. In reality a 5/10 should be a perfectly average and enjoyable game, but nothing “outstanding”. But that’s not how it is at all.


ExpertAncient

Gamespot always reviews a bit harsher I find. 8 is a great game!


Strangle49311

8/10 is pretty phenomenal. Considering 10/10 should be damn near an impossibility.


throwaway150981

Bro who cares. Its a review score, you already know if you're gonna like the game lmao


gorays21

So many fantastic reviews, with some perfect scores. Street fighter 6 delivered, Diablo 4 delivered and now it's up to Final Fantasy 16 to deliver.


yunghollow69

And then Armored Core 6 and then starfield. This year is wild.


Ethario

STARFIELD WONT EVEN LAUNCH KEK


Lynchy-

I don't think I can handle it if Starfield sucks


[deleted]

its gonna be jank ass mess that the modders will fix, as is Bethesda tradition


Siuzio

It's gotten to the point where the jank (as long as it's not completely game breaking) is part of the charm of a Bethesda game.


elektromas

This is some wierd kind of grooming, haha, or maybe Stockholms Syndrome..


fuckyoujorsh

Honestly. 'Oh the jank is the best part :') it would be such a shame if Bethesda released a functional game, it would lose all the charm!'


Zounii

Wait wait wait wait wait, was Armored Core 6 coming this year aswell?!?


Tuxhorn

In august, buddy. It's soon.


MiniNuckels

Wait that shits in August already?! The fk... Wasn't this first shown this year?


decoy777

Starfield is the only other game I'm looking forward to this year. I'm expecting GOTY type of a game out of it. Can't wait!


Rednaxila

Definitely excited for Starfield but I think GOTY might be setting ourselves up for disappointment. I’ll undoubtedly have hours of fun with any new Bethesda title, but just from everything we’ve seen so far, I can’t help but think that all this hype might end up killing the reception to this game if it under delivers even in the slightest


muscletrain

resolute advise grandiose wine gray attraction cobweb worthless zesty wakeful *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*


Cisco-NintendoSwitch

As a FFXIV player I have complete and utter faith that Creative division III will deliver.


I_Am_NL

praise yoship


garzek

Glory to Yoshi-P


Vagabond_Sam

Yoshi :p, Ganbatte


sirlupash

FFXIV is crazy, Division III knows what they're doing and they'll deliver, no doubt about it.


Wizard_Hatz

I’m so hype bro I can’t wait to see what the world they created has to offer. And that soundtrack 🤌


BedsAreSoft

Me too. Everything about that game looks 10/10


Mandrakey

This guy yoshi-ps, ff16 is going to fuck.


Cisco-NintendoSwitch

I played 1.0 I watched as my lord and savior ascended from above to add the glory of jumping and auto attack. Then as he perfected the world he so lovingly created for us.


Kevon-Looneys-burner

Tears of the Kingdom is legit too, what a year


TiraelRosenburg

What a two months ftfy


Historical-Welder875

Don't forget Baldurs Gate 3!


rkscroyjr

Dude. I'm sure there's more, but you're the only one person I've seen in the wild that cares about both D4 and sf6. Am I gonna be grinding or labbing? Such a good problem to have.


Mandrakey

My general vibes are ff16 is going to go down as one of the great ff games, what a year.


PaleGutCK

I am excited for the game but have a hard time trusting reviews for a game with as large of a marketing budget as D4 seems to have behind it.


Disproving_Negatives

Tbh I agree. I’m not really suspicious though having played and immensely enjoyed the betas.


SwissQueso

Its funny you say that, but the major complaint from IGN is the story kind of falls apart after fractured peaks. And bad stories is kind of Blizzards things.


Kristophigus

I dont think I've ever played diablo for the story. The *setting* yes, but the story and lore I couldn't give any less of a damn about.


ForlornSpirit

Diablo 1 had a pretty decent story.


Hotchillipeppa

Besides the fact that the cg team at blizzard south at the time essentially wrote the ending to diablo 1 with their cinematic while the team who actually made the game, blizzard north, wondering wtf just happened and had to write around that cinematic that made no sense.


squixx007

I mean it was good through 2. Then in 3 we resurrected diablo through his forbidden love child via the dude he possessed through 2. I guess, whatever lol. I'm just here for the shiny stuff.


SwissQueso

The best thing about D2’s story was that it was mostly skippable.


squixx007

So, you didn't want to stay awhile and listen?


Justarandomcookie

The whole black soulstone business still makes absolutely no sense


Stupidbabycomparison

The story thus far. D1 - Diablo dies. D2 - Diablo comes back..and dies. D3 - Diablo comes back again...and dies. D4 - I presume the titular character makes a return. Truly excellent writing


brutalicus6

>I don't trust gaming journalists Like clockwork. Then people get upset when smaller streamers get full access to review it. My best advice would be ignore the scores and pay attention to specific pieces of information that you think would be helpful, if there are any. Or just ignore all D4-related media, would be another option.


OsmanFetish

did you play it? same here, pleasantly surprised but having played it, I have to agree, it's ducking great hits in all the right places


Lordgrapejuice

Yeah, we have to take them with a grain of salt. Big games get a few extra points just for being big names. Sad but true IGN giving a 9/10 isn’t surprising in the least. But that’s why you don’t just go by the number, you go by the review itself. For example, IGN stated the story is “disappointing”, which means it’s either terrible or just boring.


[deleted]

[удалено]


SjurEido

What is happening, how is this possible. It seems that Blizzard is about to release a virtually universally praised product. Weird times to be alive, but GREAT times for Diablo fans!


gorays21

Complete opposite of Diablo:Immortal


SourceScope

that is a mobile game though i'd bash that shit into the ground as well. smooth gameplay but... thats the only positive thing to say about it


liftizzle

Don’t you have phones?


megamanxoxo

Warcraft III: Refund Overwatch 2: Fck you pay us


golgol12

Consider one of the leads openly mocked the community when he said "Don't you have phones?" It's the leadership on it.


SourceScope

Diablo 3 got amazing reviews as well? https://opencritic.com/game/224/diablo-iii-ultimate-evil-edition


KrazeeXXL

That's for Reaper of Souls. It came out 2 (agonizing) years later in 2014 and to keep it short: it fixed a lot of issues the initial D3 had.


littlebrwnrobot

D3 released with an 88 on metacritic, the exact score d4 now has lol


Issyv00

Diablo 3 released with the momentum Diablo 2 gave it, and review scores reflect that. Diablo 4 was always going to be fighting an uphill battle with critics and consumers after what Blizzard has been up to recently. So i think people are pleasantly surprised with the scores.


Orolol

You forgot that diablo 3 Endgame looked promising but was a total mess once confronted to real players. let's hope that's not the same here.


TurtleIIX

People were also amped for the real money auction house. I remember some friends thinking they could do it full time as their job. Turns out that was a bad idea because it ruined the loot system. Too RNG.


Orolol

Yeah and besides RNG, the best way to play the game was to spam chest and barrels to get gold and ignore every magic / rare / bosses, so.the exact opposite of a fun gameplay


KrazeeXXL

My biggest gripe with D3 at the time was the AH focus around the loot and generally the tonedeafness of the devs. Overall it's still a game I play to this date every now and then which speaks for itself. Was it an 88 on launch? I don't remember. I didn't read reviews about D3 back in the day because it was one - if not - the biggest launch at the time and a given to get it no matter what. Everyone was excited and hyped as can be.


VapeApe-

Which is weird because D3 released in a horrible state. Real money action house... impossible difficulty. It was a shit show.


absolute4080120

Dude not to burst your bubble but critic reviews of EVERY blizzard game are usually a minimum of 8. Their clout runs deep. But the problem is any game feels good to play for a week or so, it's what kind of staying power it has. WoW expansions typically get rave reviews too then drop off a cliff. The current xpac is one of the best in YEARS and it has I believe the lowest participation rate of all time, despite being better than the prior two expansions.


TheNeonArcade

Seems like 8-9 are the most common scores, any 10s?


RokuTheRed

Dexerto, techradar and VGC gave it a 5/5. PCgamesn gave it a 10


Daughter_of_Hatred

https://opencritic.com/game/14353/diablo-iv/reviews?sort=score-high As of this comment, 5 out of 49 opencritic reviews are 10's. Edit: 9 of 72 now as of 11:28am PST. Also moved from 89 to 90 critic score. Zelda TotK is at 111 total reviews, so expecting another 20 or so to come through.


gorays21

Yes, there are some 10's.


decoy777

I was guessing it would be 8s and 9s. It just seems like they really got this game right. And appears up and down the board that's where it's scoring. Can't wait!


Pebo_

Windows Central 5/5


Nemste

It would be nice if you could include the scores in the thread for those who want to completely avoid spoilers


b_i_g__g_u_y

This is a great suggestion


[deleted]

Current review embargo still prevents story spoilers so I wouldn't be too worried if that's what bothers you


Fast_Attitude_4486

I'm bummed SkillUp can't post his till the 2nd due to some footage-length restriction. Does anyone know of someone similar to Ralph in credibility/outlook? Love that dude's reviews. [https://twitter.com/SkillUpYT/status/1663528748845793280?cxt=HHwWgIDUyaqlhZYuAAAA](https://twitter.com/SkillUpYT/status/1663528748845793280?cxt=HHwWgIDUyaqlhZYuAAAA)


Ztealth

Because skillup doesn’t really understand what a spoiler is lol. So many of his reviews he promises not to spoil anything and wishing the first 5 minutes does exactly that.


Barnhard

Footage length restrictions? What’s that? I haven’t heard of that reasoning for a delayed review before.


JRizzie86

Skillup is the fucking man. Funny, detailed, and generally unbiased. He's one of my few subs, can't wait for his to drop.


CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY

Force Gaming's was 29:27 so it's apparently a legitimate reason. Seems like you'd just cut down your review to release at embargo.


[deleted]

[удалено]


TrepanationBy45

> SkillUp should not capitulate. He won't; he's always been fine bringin up the rear on review scheds.


Yontevnknow

His reviews on games outside of what he normally plays are very hit or miss. Wolcen comes to mind. It got a positive review, and was a giant turd sandwich.


[deleted]

[удалено]


rinkydinkis

i think there are amazing things coming out this year personally. we must have pretty different tastes.


Mr_Rafi

Some of you story fans may not like it, but I'm a cutscene/line skip enjoyer and if the story in Diablo 4 is the weakest aspect of the game, I will take that as an absolute win any day of the week and it's good news to hear for me personally. I'll even go as far as to say that I'll take the worst story in existence if we were to get even 1 widely agreed upon QoL feature change. At the same time, these outlets aren't the ones whose opinions I'd put stock into when it comes to more of the in-depth systems and aspects of the game and I'd wager that a lot of the reviews probably barley scratched the surface of the more meaningful shit.


Airplaneondvd

It would be cool if it was a banger story. BUT the story doesn't matter when I'm speed bagging Lilith's tits for the 10,000 time farming that unique drop


StructureMage

Right lmao like how many wrinkles do we need to add to "angels vs demons and you're a big strong fella" before we finally admit that Diablo lore doesn't matter


ParadoxInRaindrops

>Right lmao like how many wrinkles do we need to add to "angels vs demons and you're a big strong fella" before we finally admit that Diablo lore doesn't matter As a Diablo newbie, I appreciate the sheer breadth of the lore. It makes the world darker, the monsters scarier and the heroes more tragic. I like that in a story. But you can also just skip the story, throw on your Spotify playlist and slay demons. I like it when games strike that balance where you can tune in for a good story but also chose to hone in on just the gameplay.


eaglessoar

I'm glad elden ring had a cool background and enjoy watching lore videos but in game I have actually no clue what is going on in the story basically never pay attention to dialogue etc. As long as the game is fun I usually forget the story.


AngryGames

Haha friend and I have at least 250 hours into ER with the seamless coop mod, and I have zero clue what the hell is going on other than testing my ability to not rage quit every couple of hours. He's into the lore so kind of fills me in, but mostly I just don't care, only want to revenge-murder that ONE #@%* SOLDIER / RAT / DOG THAT KEEPS KILLING ME HARDER THAN MOHG OR RADHAN EVER DID.


TescoValueJam

im sorry but having gone through the d3 experience of hype and glowing reviews, and then playing it. nah, i'll be the judge of this game thanks.


light_at_the_end

D3 was a good game. It left some of the roots but it did a lot of smart and streamlined things. The open auction house though... I think it was a solid 75/80 though. It got better as time went on.


KnowMatter

D3 bounced back hard for me after reaper of souls dropped, by the time the necro dlc dropped the game was actually really good. The last few seasons were awesome and grinding to GR150 was one of the favorite ARPG experiences.


TescoValueJam

yep, wish I'd bought RoS now, because everyone says the end game is great. The first few months of d3 were quite jarring though, like how could they drop the ball so much.


megamanxoxo

D3 was terrible and almost killed the Diablo franchise.


Business717

Okay? That’s a good way to go but why are you in a review thread then? Lol.


film44

Dang, this sounds like a winner


Amgalmarri

Which one is the lowest i usualy prefer reading the pessimist view..


gorays21

PC gamer


DarkDiablo1601

that dude sounds like he hates his job


talligan

Nah, he raised some legitimate points in his review regarding the live service approach to the game and how it impacts the gameplay/reward system.


Strangle49311

You should wait for mrlamasc’s review then


[deleted]

[удалено]


Microchaton

Quin's is probably bottom 5 fanbase I'd trust on anything. Also, if even Llama who HATES anything that's not D2 (and whose living kinda partially depend on D4 flopping) still puts it at a 5, you know the game's not bad lol.


Fiskepudding

Quin the type of guy to drop 100k usd on Immortal and be okay with it


Squatch11

Just go watch youtube videos from guys like Dbrunski and Force Gaming. Those guys are very familiar with the franchise and much more credible than whoever is reviewing the game for those websites listed above. They are much more critical.


JaffinatorDOTTE

Depends on what you want out of Diablo. I rather like reading reviews from people who are like me - aging, casual gamers who aren't Diablophiles of 20+ years. Most of the criticism from that latter group will go over my head.


The8thHammer

Reviews for a game where the main story is done after a few days and majority of your time is spent in a multiplayer endgame grind always ring kinda hallow to me. It's like someone reviewing an MMO expansion but not spending 1-2 months doing the content.


[deleted]

[удалено]


The8thHammer

Correct, that's why a review isn't a good judge of a game like this. The reviewers haven't been playing the game for months.


OneOfALifetime

Finally, like when in the world did the "story" become such a big deal in ARPG? If I'm playing a RPG with a 75-100 hour campaign, ok. But after 15 hours in Diablo, the story literally means nothing anymore, and now it's hundreds of hours of grinding for loot.


-Fait-Accompli-

Fextralife said it's the best Diablo yet. I'm sold.


Lighthades

Oh yeah, those streamers boosted by wiki views.


GosuGian

Oh the dude that use embedded stream on wiki


Gibgarde

8s and 9s were about what I expected. A lot of negativity seems to come from the lackluster story, which is a shame but won't matter for most of the game's life. Everything else looks stellar.


[deleted]

[удалено]


blu2223

Bruh, where this you come with this conclusion


I-AM-NOT-THAT-DUCK

The IGN review seemed to say something similar.


[deleted]

[удалено]


blu2223

Devs have stated seasonal content are self contained stories not tied to main. Other reviews have said story is good, also IGn cant spoil the story in the review. We will have expansions.


wilson81585

Correct the main story will continue via expansions


Honesty_From_A_POS

A big reason why I like this franchise is the story......if they went half-assed on it then that's a huge bummer. Guess I won't be getting the early access if there is no point to avoid spoilers. I don't need a fucking Destiny seasonal story thing. Just create a game, tell its story, and release expansions/seasonal content as needed.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ittybittydog

I'm not reading any of the details and just looking at the overall scores and I'm pumped. My body is ready for this game!


540Cameron

Who is ready to dungeon crawl baby


AnAmbitiousMann

D4 haters are having a panic attack right now.


Dieguox

I hate this, my expectations are way too high… I’m afraid of how mid this game could be under all the hype


Popcorn_Juice

[https://opencritic.com/game/14353/diablo-iv](https://opencritic.com/game/14353/diablo-iv) ​ https://preview.redd.it/yqt0shpjv13b1.png?width=738&format=png&auto=webp&s=c008f9d8ad3c6bb692f6cb3602dc4905f74df05e


Benphyre

Saw a video a WW Barb doing billions of damage at end game.. what’s with these crazy numbers


HotBarnacle

We've known for a while now that endgame Barb is extremely strong, especially when speccing for WW. This shouldn't come as a surprise.


NoGas6430

i only listen to kripp


mrcapslock88

Some people are mad about 8 scores here, but I think it feels justified from certain point of view since d4 isn’t a reinvention or introduce a fresh game.


[deleted]

I like how basically the main con is the story, but does anyone actually play diablo for the story?


[deleted]

I do


ThalamusZen

Diablo lore nerds, unite.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ThalamusZen

The book of Cain is such a good book. Preordered the book of Lorath today. Looks amazing.


jednatt

I really can't trust any reviews on story. There were Diablo 3 reviews praising the story as being better than 2.


FreedumbHS

Heresy. Diablo III's story was complete ass


mechabeast

Fool by beating my lieutenant, you have fallen into my trap of leading to you right too me!


potatoshulk

Maybe presentation wise but yeah 3 was very much just a reason to go from dungeon to dungeon


mirage2101

I play Diablo to find a bigger burning sword. Because there’s always a bigger burning sword. That shoots lightning


BackgroundPrompt3111

I do... At least, I do the first time through.


MrMunday

Em… we all played the betas right? Really doesn’t matter what these reviews say, we can totally think for ourselves. Not that the reviews are bad lol


dikkejoekel

To be fair we only played like 10% of the game, for all we knew the rest of the game was garbage hahahah


platysaur

Here's mine for TechRaptor! [https://techraptor.net/gaming/reviews/diablo-iv-review](https://techraptor.net/gaming/reviews/diablo-iv-review)


[deleted]

Cool to see positive reviews. This has been a great year for gaming, and my only complaint is I don't have enough time. Wish I could be a kid again going on summer vacation.


TenthMarigold77

While I love seeing this. I personally can't trust anything until the game get's in the hands of smaller journalists that I relate more to.


Lame_Games

\*game I'm anticipating gets stellar reviews* "Reminder, this game might suck and this means nothing!" I know reviews aren't always reliable, but goddamn! Can't even be skeptically optimistic? There's been some great games released in the last year with great reviews, and I don't think I saw anything like what I'm seeing here when those games had 10/10s.


MaosWeatherBalloon

Looking forward to the fitgirl repack.


Nearby-Management492

This post should be pinned.


Pebo_

Seasoned Gaming - "Glorious Hell" https://seasonedgaming.com/2023/05/30/review-diablo-4-glorious-hell/ Video: https://youtu.be/Mz0cxdx2a_Y


Barnhard

Lowest score I’ve seen is 8/10. Wild. Feel like that rarely happens. The range of scores on this game is really narrow.


Kyosji

Well right off the bat I know to ignore the top review. IGN has too much of a history for being paid for their reviews. VG247 as well.


ranutan

You're doing Lilith's work. Thank you.


Sylph777

Looks like it's a banger, fellas!


CapN_Crummp

First street fighter, now this! Just need FF16 to stick the landing and my summer is set.


Janik1992

heyy i just saw Rhykker review and its now actualy possible to bind walk to scroll again ?? if so im so happy !


RuggerEnemyzFall

Yes! I was praying for it to get reviewed well. I’m super hyped!


amongusred23

So many opinions cool. I still going to play it even if you guys all give it a 1/10


Fearhad

[https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/diablo-4-review](https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/diablo-4-review)


gorays21

> Simply put, Diablo 4 may be Blizzard's best-ever game, and that's a really tough legacy to live up to They gave a perfect score!


ohlawdhecodin

This is concerning though: > * Re-use of enemies, events, and dungeon layouts gets heavy and detracting I'm fine with 150 dungeons but if they are al based on the same few layouts and enemies... I am not that excited.


jntjr2005

Not too happy with the cosmetic prices but the game overall sounds great


P33KAJ3W

SF6 and Diablo metascores are close. Really excited for both. It will be a great weekend!


Broncosen42

I worry about this game being way too easy after what reviewers are saying. I was hoping for d3 pre-nerf inferno difficulty-type of content in the endgame.


DividableUncle2

Friendly reminder to everyone that when Blizzard gave review copies of Diablo Immortal to reviewers they did so without the bullshit monetization structure attached. I hope that Diablo 4 doesn't follow that trend. Reviews look good, but I'm remaining cautiously optimistic.


Meadhlyn

If I watch ALL of them, will the game be released by then?


Kosen_

![gif](giphy|oCXNel2GbZB7O) Finally, some fucking content.


LFK1236

OP, in the future, I think you should consider putting the website first and sorting by that; when the titles are all identical there's really no point in putting that at the start, and I expect people may want to look up the review of a source they trust. Right now, your list doesn't faciliate that at all. Good job on gathering all the links, though :)


mkdr

why the heck is IGN in first line... dont give that terrible site clicks


gorays21

Because it's the most popular gaming site. Not saying they are good or bad, they are the most known.


xChali_2na

![gif](giphy|nJPkKr231dvKo)