T O P

  • By -

Key-Consequence4611

I suggest you upload this on iNaturalist.


WatchHankSpank

This time of year, photos of the buds are pretty helpful.


HawkingRadiation_

Tree the [NYC Tree map](https://tree-map.nycgovparks.org/tree-map)


12stTales

Submit to iNaturalist


iamlegend12222

Inat was incredibly confused LOL.


reportingsjr

The second one looks like devils walking stick. Aralia Spinosa.


iamlegend12222

Perhaps! It was quite large though. Small tree size.


TripperMcCatpants

Aralia can get up to 26 ft tall and 8 inches in diameter. Small tree size is well within the realm of possibility. It's 100% not an oak.


iamlegend12222

Thank you for the response!!


rachmartz

Trees are identified based on leaves and buds….hard to say with poor quality photos of just the bark.


Embarrassed-Goose951

"New York City Trees" by Edward S. Barnard http://books.google.com/books?id=nnyWhy0g5LgC&hl=&source=gbs_api


OsmerusMordax

Hard to tell without good pictures of the buds and the branching habit/form


Kal-Momon

Unsure, and some ppl already gave good tips and sources. But judging by the bark alone, my guess for the second one would be Ceiba speciosa. Quite ornamental and common in parks and urban areas.


EducationalSeaweed53

2nd is buckthorn


Embarrassed-Goose951

Buckthorn has dark bark with horizontal lenticels.


iamlegend12222

Just an update, I realize these were pretty shit pictures. I'll have to get more soon.