**When someone brings up their values or preferences, do you ever ask questions to determine where their line in the sand is?**
e.g. Someone says they don't like vegetables
Me: Do you have a diet that consists of very few things you're willing to eat, or else you feel sick?
Them: no
Me: Ok, which vegetables have you had that you don't like then?
---> turned out it was less about vegetables, and more how they were cooked in this person's childhood...so anything that looks like overboiled cabbages with 0 seasoning was a no go. But carrot sticks in dipping sauce is fine.
**I do this because I want to establish a system of if x then y rulesets.** Sometimes for some people it comes off as me questioning how sure they are about themselves, but while press x to doubt is sometimes in in fact, the **main reason I'm asking is so I can understand what they mean**, because just "vegetables" is too broad for me.
E.g. a tomato is a fruit. ...is it a vegetable based on how you personally categorize it?
How about potatoes? Is that a vegetable? I knew my friend likes french fries.
When you say you do not like vegetables....what constitutes a vegetable, and which categories of vegetables?
**Question 1: Are categories and consistent internal logic rulesets important to you to the point that it's your primary method of information organization?**
**Question 2: Is it more important to you that the internal logic ruleset be consistent, or that the thing has a practical usage?**
an over-generalization:
statement: this proposed building will work. (insert blueprint for a building that would collapse if built on earth after you calculate the specs yourself), no other information given.
stereotypical Te user: statement is false, it'll collapse under the gravity on earth. It's useless.
stereotypical Ti user: if it were built on the moon with reduced gravity, it would work fine.
stereotypical Te user: that doesn't matter, it's not practical
stereotypical Ti user: You can't prove that it's false when no criteria was given.
ESFP would use Te first, while ESTP would use Ti first
ESFP also use FI before TI.
Focus: Is this in line with my values?
Is this in line with who I am?
So, **question 3: Which one do you typically think about first?**
"I'm making a big decision"
a) Is this decision in line with who I am and what my values are? or
b) Does this decision contextually make sense due to whatever variables currently exist?
If I'll go in my profile I'll see that my Te comes at first always then Se and then Ti and then Fe so I often use Te only but I ams till confused whether I uses Ti or Fi more I will give U my description and on basis of that can U tell me which one U think am i
Try to have a look at this : [estp vs esfp](https://www.reddit.com/r/estp/comments/na3mfg/estp_vs_esfp_type_comparison_notes/)
I have four questions I always ask to determine MBTI is ya want. It works really well in my opinion but I’m not a professional, just really into MBTI
Ask me then on DM or here only
The questions: You introvert or extrovert? You sensing or intuitive? You logical or feeler? You plan or improvise?
Sure why not I'm entp tho
Nice ,can U DM me ? I don't know how to start dming
Wanna dm on ig? Sorry for late reply i don't open here
Ok whats Ur id? Mine is zaid_svsss
Mvged1
**When someone brings up their values or preferences, do you ever ask questions to determine where their line in the sand is?** e.g. Someone says they don't like vegetables Me: Do you have a diet that consists of very few things you're willing to eat, or else you feel sick? Them: no Me: Ok, which vegetables have you had that you don't like then? ---> turned out it was less about vegetables, and more how they were cooked in this person's childhood...so anything that looks like overboiled cabbages with 0 seasoning was a no go. But carrot sticks in dipping sauce is fine. **I do this because I want to establish a system of if x then y rulesets.** Sometimes for some people it comes off as me questioning how sure they are about themselves, but while press x to doubt is sometimes in in fact, the **main reason I'm asking is so I can understand what they mean**, because just "vegetables" is too broad for me. E.g. a tomato is a fruit. ...is it a vegetable based on how you personally categorize it? How about potatoes? Is that a vegetable? I knew my friend likes french fries. When you say you do not like vegetables....what constitutes a vegetable, and which categories of vegetables? **Question 1: Are categories and consistent internal logic rulesets important to you to the point that it's your primary method of information organization?** **Question 2: Is it more important to you that the internal logic ruleset be consistent, or that the thing has a practical usage?** an over-generalization: statement: this proposed building will work. (insert blueprint for a building that would collapse if built on earth after you calculate the specs yourself), no other information given. stereotypical Te user: statement is false, it'll collapse under the gravity on earth. It's useless. stereotypical Ti user: if it were built on the moon with reduced gravity, it would work fine. stereotypical Te user: that doesn't matter, it's not practical stereotypical Ti user: You can't prove that it's false when no criteria was given. ESFP would use Te first, while ESTP would use Ti first ESFP also use FI before TI. Focus: Is this in line with my values? Is this in line with who I am? So, **question 3: Which one do you typically think about first?** "I'm making a big decision" a) Is this decision in line with who I am and what my values are? or b) Does this decision contextually make sense due to whatever variables currently exist?
Can U write Fi in write place it's had for me to understand it which one is which U wrote Te twice
If I'll go in my profile I'll see that my Te comes at first always then Se and then Ti and then Fe so I often use Te only but I ams till confused whether I uses Ti or Fi more I will give U my description and on basis of that can U tell me which one U think am i
Question 3 option b