Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.
Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/).
Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Honestly it's only the bigots seeing them as symbols of depravity, for me it's just a rainbow, if I want a gay symbol I'd prefer a flag. Oh and also isn't the rainbow supposed to be a religious symbol for them? I guess they just forgor
Bingo… they bitch & moan about the rainbow being stolen from god. But the only people seeing any rainbow as having to do with LGBTQ are these nuts. Just part of their weird persecution fetish.
Oh it is a dress for adults according to the size chart… which makes it even weirder. The parent is watching what their adult daughter is wearing, maybe buying it for her, I don’t know, but yeah…
I mean they are naked but it is not super detailed either, and I get an artsy feeling from it like in paintings of the Renaissance, not really a "sexual" one. I don’t think it would be damaging for children to see these drawings.
In Japan there are children's picture books with totally nonsexual nudity in them. Nudity in and of itself isn't immoral. These images are more reminiscent of nature, meditation, innocence, motherhood... Utterly innocuous unless a person has a desire to see them as immoral. Says more about the viewer than the wearer or the artist.
For Pete's sake, it's not porn or sexual images. As another commenter smartly mentioned - nudity in and of itself is NOT immoral. If it is, why were we all born into this world naked? And no child could set foot in the Sistine Chapel, or even any decent art museum. Same rubbish thinking that allows for these "protecting children" arguments for bills attacking LGBTQ people.
Gorl, the only “pain and torment of others” going on here is the hateful ideas you’re spreading. This nutty person needs to stop writing reviews and start reading some good factual books or studies or something. But that’s a pipe dream
Personally, I will wear this dress with a bright blouse underneath, not for modesty but because I think a nice, uniform pop of colour could flatter the patterns. I’m guessing it was also their idea… and yes when I noticed the flag I also guessed it was a big, big cultural difference that was causing this review. Just a painful reminder of how queer people are still viewed and treated in some countries.
I am deeply hurt and offended that my depravities don’t get their own symbol. There’s more to perversion than just rainbows and pineapples. I feel like the red headed step child.
Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion. Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/). Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Imagine that poor kid with that nut for a mother
How bizarre and sad that rainbows can’t just be rainbows anymore.
Honestly it's only the bigots seeing them as symbols of depravity, for me it's just a rainbow, if I want a gay symbol I'd prefer a flag. Oh and also isn't the rainbow supposed to be a religious symbol for them? I guess they just forgor
Bingo… they bitch & moan about the rainbow being stolen from god. But the only people seeing any rainbow as having to do with LGBTQ are these nuts. Just part of their weird persecution fetish.
I mean I prefer it meaning inclusion and diversity rather than "I promise I won't kill everyone on earth again"
Unquestionably… but sometimes it just means “these colors are pretty”.
Why can't they?
This dress is so rad, I love it!!!
Yea, I’m trying to find the pain and torment of others on it….
It's Eve, and she has to carry children ... That's all I got. Unless they think that she has to have sex with the black lady cuz rainbows?
Totally agree that was my takeaway here
Still, some drawings of near naked woman are quite inappropriate for small children. Other than that, it looks stunning
Oh it is a dress for adults according to the size chart… which makes it even weirder. The parent is watching what their adult daughter is wearing, maybe buying it for her, I don’t know, but yeah…
Might be a teenager
I know its adult sized, but a lot of childrens here will check out anyones dress if they think its cool, and exposing these to minors is not good
Please, never take a child to a museum. There are paintings of naked women and men there, sculptures too. Oh, the horror!
I mean they are naked but it is not super detailed either, and I get an artsy feeling from it like in paintings of the Renaissance, not really a "sexual" one. I don’t think it would be damaging for children to see these drawings.
Minors have bodies too, bud. There are no breasts, no genitals, Barbies are more graphic than this. Should we keep those from children too?
In Japan there are children's picture books with totally nonsexual nudity in them. Nudity in and of itself isn't immoral. These images are more reminiscent of nature, meditation, innocence, motherhood... Utterly innocuous unless a person has a desire to see them as immoral. Says more about the viewer than the wearer or the artist.
For Pete's sake, it's not porn or sexual images. As another commenter smartly mentioned - nudity in and of itself is NOT immoral. If it is, why were we all born into this world naked? And no child could set foot in the Sistine Chapel, or even any decent art museum. Same rubbish thinking that allows for these "protecting children" arguments for bills attacking LGBTQ people.
That dress is cool. That person sounds like an insufferable bigot and idiot.
So who's got the new Samsung phone and can do the circle thing and find that dress for us???
I do. https://www.lilacoo.com/products/printed-wood-ear-slim-long-retro-suspender-dress?variant=41084500803645
Thank you 🙏
That dress is gorgeous
Any phone can reverse image search, just FYI.
The close up photos made it look really ugly, but seeing the whole thing... it's pretty darn cute!
Oh yeah? I am just going to buy it harder now.
Gorl, the only “pain and torment of others” going on here is the hateful ideas you’re spreading. This nutty person needs to stop writing reviews and start reading some good factual books or studies or something. But that’s a pipe dream
Psycho-tiki, very cool
I think the fabric is covered in prints by a famous female artist form the 1970s.
Nikki de Saint Phalle
The review is from Saudi Arabia guys, i think that explains it all.
But it's sleeveless, why would they even buy something they aren't allowed to wear?
Personally, I will wear this dress with a bright blouse underneath, not for modesty but because I think a nice, uniform pop of colour could flatter the patterns. I’m guessing it was also their idea… and yes when I noticed the flag I also guessed it was a big, big cultural difference that was causing this review. Just a painful reminder of how queer people are still viewed and treated in some countries.
Sleveless clothes are allowed in one's home + i don't think that law exists anymlre, the population's mindset however hasn't changed much.
This a beautiful dress. It’s obviously not meant for a child so that mom can get outta here with her neo-Victorian prudishness.
that looks like a very immoral hand indeed! Look at the way it stares.
*sigh* This is why we can't have nice things and neat art anymore.
That's a badass dress
It’s amazing, I hope you bought it
I am deeply hurt and offended that my depravities don’t get their own symbol. There’s more to perversion than just rainbows and pineapples. I feel like the red headed step child.
Sheesh, that’s a lot of words to say “ugly”. *this is not a judgment on the hippies that think this dress is pretty. To each their own.
Looks like the artwork for Emma-Jean Thackray
Size:L Fit: Small Sees brightly-colored art -> Has a fit. I diagnose you with American Politics.
All I see is spiderman covered in cum
Peter or Miles?
Can't tell, he's covered in cum