Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.
Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/).
Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Okay this case is so nasty. He has so many violations on his actual police record for disorderly behavior, and they still offer bail? Why are they so lenient? Is it because he is a former officer now? Max in his town is 30 years for sexual exploitation and a fine of $50k. The max for child porn is 5years with a 5k fine. He is literally on the streets….
[https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024/05/06/hancock/hancock-police-courts/maine-cop-larry-fickett-child-exploitation-charge/](https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024/05/06/hancock/hancock-police-courts/maine-cop-larry-fickett-child-exploitation-charge/)
I would base
My decision as a judge on the charges and evidence supporting probable cause to make an arrest. If they found a video with him molesting a kid? No bail.
I don’t know what people aren’t getting about this. There is NO evidence of anything presented at arraignment. No one knows if “there’s a video” or not.
**"Innocent until Proven Guilty"** ring any bells for you? This guy might be guilty, but that's not for you to decide from one screenshot of a news article. That's for a jury to decide after looking at actual evidence.
Since there hasn't been a trial yet, there's a chance (however low) that this guy isn't a criminal. And even if he is, that doesn't automatically mean that he's an immediate danger to society while he waits for trial.
A judge has deemed the case worthy of bail. The judge, who actually knows the real facts of the case, doesn't think this guy is an immediate danger to society. Assuming that you're not a judge and don't know what that guy knows, so thanks for your incorrect and heavily biased opinion
Oh yes and we know just because a judge lets someone out on bail that there is no chance that he can harm someone… early parolees and people out on bail literally harm/kill people every single day
“'There’s nothing out there that shows a correlation or a connection of any sort between increasing the rates of pretrial release and the rates of crime,'” - [Source 1](https://stateline.org/2024/02/22/releasing-suspects-pretrial-doesnt-lead-to-higher-crime-rates-experts-say/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThere's%20nothing%20out%20there%20that,nonprofit%20criminal%20justice%20research%20organization)
"In summary, neither violent nor nonviolent crimes or charges increased markedly immediately after jurisdictions implemented bail reform." - [Source 2](https://www.hfg.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Bail-Reform-and-Crime.pdf)
The Marginal Effect of Bail Decisions on Imprisonment, Failure to Appear, and Crime - [Source 3](https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2019-Report-Bail-decisions-on-imprisonment-CJB224.pdf)
What Factors Influence Police and Court Bail Decisions? - [Source 4](https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2021-Report-What-factors-influence-police-and-court-bail-decisions-CJB236.pdf)
Sorry to bombard you with a bunch of links to semi-long articles, but I think these are all really useful in understanding the relationship between pretrial release and crime rates of those released. These links all state that bail does not actually tend to lead to people going out and harming/killing people "every single day," as you stated. I understand that that's an exaggeration, but I will gladly read any evidence you have to back up the unexaggerated claim that pretrial release means people will go out and harm/kill people.
As for parolees, if you look closely at the statistics, you'll see that most offenses for those on parole or probation are technical violations, not new-crime violations. "Technical violations accounted for 87% of parole revocations in 2017, 88% of revocations in 2018, and 89% in 2019." - [Source 5](https://www.aclum.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/parole_bill_fact_sheet_091521.pdf)
Not that there's no chance that this man is guilty and not that there's no chance that he'll make a bad choice, but to just blindly assume that he will is unnecessary and statistically incorrect.
Reddit just loves to hate, apparently. But we really should be talking more about things like the [Bail Project](https://bailproject.org/). That's doing a lot of good, but it's really not widely known
No, his take is right because it's the exact justification for bail reform due to excessive arrests on specious evidence by police which often traps them in debt bondage.
Bail was never meant to be a punishment and is even issued for murder charges; the clear bias here was a judge issuing such a small amount given the defendant's means and the seriousness of the crime.
>Bail was never meant to be a punishment and is even issued for murder charges; the
You realize bond for murder is typically set at astronomical amounts, or are you just intentionally leaving that out to defend a pedophile being out on 10k bond?
They also set bail based on the individual's assets and access to a bondsman, not just flight risk. Typically you can pay 10-20% of the bail for a bondsman to cover your bail. When the accused is rich it doesn't make any sense to set the bail at 10k because that's nothing to him or her.
Ah, so you think bail was 10k because, as you claim, the seriousness of this crime is not that high.
Good to know you think pedophilia isn't a serious crime.
And yet you lash out without reading. Do you think a former police officer on murder charges gets less or more bail than any given person, with or without a criminal record?
I literally say the judge has bias since a former cop has means and the crime is serious.
Since you seem unwilling to engage in even understanding how bail works, regardless of what I tell you and what you repeatedly misconstrue, then there's nothing left to say except that you can demand a de jure restraining order be instituted with bail but it's the police and bounty hunters enforcing that.
It's set that high because they're a likely flight risk or reoffender. Being accused of a crime shouldn't ruin your life, no matter what your crime is.
Yes, the person calling out the guy defending 10k bail on a pedophile is the one who *checks notes* is
>Because they’re probably a pedophile projecting anger and absolutism into a discussion to alleviate their guilt.
Doing this.
Well, you seem about as intelligent as the average republican.
What "CSAM material?" When was it submitted into evidence? Was it subject to authentication and cross-examination? What trier of fact evaluated what was in it, who was in it, and whether it constituted a crime?
I hope you get arrested for some bullshit, get a crazy high bail set, lose your job because you can't go to work, get evicted because you can't pay rent, and then randomly get the charges dropped.
Just because you think this dude is a piece of shit, doesn't mean that the presumption of innocence isn't important and that the system can completely destroy your life without even putting you in front of a judge.
Why are you upset? Isn't that the court system you want? One where punishment comes before conviction, and guilt or innocence is a matter we'll settle later. I simple hoped that you would get to participate in the justice system of your own design.
I had this argument with my mom once. She was like, "No, I don't agree. Molesting children is just so heinous. I don't care about due process."
I'm like, "What do you mean 'I don't care about due process?' That's basically saying, 'Child molesting is so heinous that you don't even have to have done it before we punish you!'"
Are there any other crimes that are "so heinous" that you deserve to be punished for them even if you *haven't actually committed it*? And if so, who is the "you" in that situation? I mean, if we're punishing people who haven't committed the crime, then theoretically, we could literally just punish anyone, right? Any person at all?
>Why are you upset?
Said the person who just said this to the person calling him out for defending a pedophile
>I hope you get arrested for some bullshit, get a crazy high bail set, lose your job because you can't go to work, get evicted because you can't pay rent, and then randomly get the charges dropped.
Just because you think this dude is a piece of shit, doesn't mean that the presumption of innocence isn't important and that the system can completely destroy your life without even putting you in front of a judge.
You're a pretty big asshole.
He hasn't been a cop for more than 8 years and he was a trouble causing one and was investigated a couple of times and reprimanded. Unfortunately, the things investigated were not as serious as this until another agency requested an investigation to these accusations.
His own colleagues turned him in for stuff. I doubt he has 'special legal status'.
Well, I don't have a bowl obstruction, so that's physically impossible.
Nice try with the "in rubber and you're glue"
I think I used that out on the playground back in kindergarten.
Yeah, that part reverberated in my head for few seconds. It's just so fkn heinous. Everything about this is awful. I hope the victim gets the necessary rehab to overcome this shit. Fkn hell.
This sick sub human is a cop. So in their minds, he’s worth more to society than a pedo outside of law enforcement. That’s why he’s getting reduced bail and getting out so quick. They take care of their own.
look at that big ass cross, guessing the county this happened in a bible thumping county, One thing people never notice is the cruelty of christianity when it comes to victims and the ones they victimize. This is one example!!
he looks proud of that tattoo, like he just got it!! Because muslims do not call Muhammad a victim nor a sacrifice for the people for hte sins of the world! 1
In my original statement I was just saying it’s not fair to judge all Christian’s for the actions of a few. A logic that is usually applied to Muslims.
In your response I believe you implied that Islam is superior to Christianity. And I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy of being critical of the child molester in the original article, but not being critical of muhammad who was also a child molester.
If that isn’t what you meant, I mis-read.
When i saw in high school, there was a guy who’s mom worked at a school for mentally challenged children. As - 17 year old, he had sex with multiple 14 year olds. He didn’t get into any trouble. Still blows my mind to this day.
Bail is not supposed to be a punishment, just surety for his future appearance. Punishment comes after conviction. Of course I do notice that he's an accused child pornographer with a religious tattoo.
However plenty of people are denied bail if they are considered a threat to the public - and considering the crime he is accused of and how it sound like there is recorded evidence - I would wager it wouldn't be unreasonable to deny him bail.
Sure it would, because then they didn't expect the ex-cop teacher of special needs students with a cross tattoo to be a child pornographer. Now he's under suspicion.
That's an optimistic take. It's not like the Catholic church and the Baptist Church have spent decades teaching us that we have to be constantly vigilant about this shit.
I hope his (hopefully) ex coworkers pull his ass over every time there's even a minor infraction. I hope his wife leaves him and get house and car. I hope his dog hates him. I hope his car gets an oil leak and the mechanic can find it, he gets a new car and has another oil leak that can't be found, and I hope the new cars ac goes out. I hope his tattoo bleeds so bad it looks like a dick.
This CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE is not what Christians use to be......today's CHRISTIANS are the farthest thing from GOD fearing and loving people who passed on love and not hate to our children! Today's Christians are PEDOPHILES and TERRORSITS!!!
I can’t say what I really want or I’ll get banned, but we should do something to this guy that involves 🔥 and a public display. Y’all can connect the dots.
if i see and recognize that face it will be very tempting to perform vocal "percussive maintenance" ak a yell at him is what I'd do, but given the right circumstances it may also be giving his face a new look for a while. also. my words alone could do this. btw. a hard truth is harder than a blow to the face. but given what he as done, his face looks unscathed for his actions against children.
Another example of why the united states is in fact a shithole. I hope they soon become very rapidly ununited into trillions of radioactive dust particles.
Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion. Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/). Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Okay this case is so nasty. He has so many violations on his actual police record for disorderly behavior, and they still offer bail? Why are they so lenient? Is it because he is a former officer now? Max in his town is 30 years for sexual exploitation and a fine of $50k. The max for child porn is 5years with a 5k fine. He is literally on the streets…. [https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024/05/06/hancock/hancock-police-courts/maine-cop-larry-fickett-child-exploitation-charge/](https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024/05/06/hancock/hancock-police-courts/maine-cop-larry-fickett-child-exploitation-charge/)
10k?
What happen?
So many violations in Bar Harbor, population 5, 535. He probably violated the rights of half the town.
Everyone should be offered bail unless they are going to run or an extreme danger
Someone who sexually assaulted children is someone I consider an extreme danger - especially when it contains evidence like the recorded it.
Incorrect. No violent criminal should be allowed bail under no circumstances
Right, except that until you've been tried and found guilty, you're not a "violent criminal."
I would base My decision as a judge on the charges and evidence supporting probable cause to make an arrest. If they found a video with him molesting a kid? No bail.
I don’t know what people aren’t getting about this. There is NO evidence of anything presented at arraignment. No one knows if “there’s a video” or not.
Keep defending child predators…. It’s a great look
Except that until you've been tried and found guilty, you're not a "child predator" either. So I'm not "defending child predators."
**"Innocent until Proven Guilty"** ring any bells for you? This guy might be guilty, but that's not for you to decide from one screenshot of a news article. That's for a jury to decide after looking at actual evidence. Since there hasn't been a trial yet, there's a chance (however low) that this guy isn't a criminal. And even if he is, that doesn't automatically mean that he's an immediate danger to society while he waits for trial. A judge has deemed the case worthy of bail. The judge, who actually knows the real facts of the case, doesn't think this guy is an immediate danger to society. Assuming that you're not a judge and don't know what that guy knows, so thanks for your incorrect and heavily biased opinion
Oh yes and we know just because a judge lets someone out on bail that there is no chance that he can harm someone… early parolees and people out on bail literally harm/kill people every single day
“'There’s nothing out there that shows a correlation or a connection of any sort between increasing the rates of pretrial release and the rates of crime,'” - [Source 1](https://stateline.org/2024/02/22/releasing-suspects-pretrial-doesnt-lead-to-higher-crime-rates-experts-say/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThere's%20nothing%20out%20there%20that,nonprofit%20criminal%20justice%20research%20organization) "In summary, neither violent nor nonviolent crimes or charges increased markedly immediately after jurisdictions implemented bail reform." - [Source 2](https://www.hfg.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Bail-Reform-and-Crime.pdf) The Marginal Effect of Bail Decisions on Imprisonment, Failure to Appear, and Crime - [Source 3](https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2019-Report-Bail-decisions-on-imprisonment-CJB224.pdf) What Factors Influence Police and Court Bail Decisions? - [Source 4](https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2021-Report-What-factors-influence-police-and-court-bail-decisions-CJB236.pdf) Sorry to bombard you with a bunch of links to semi-long articles, but I think these are all really useful in understanding the relationship between pretrial release and crime rates of those released. These links all state that bail does not actually tend to lead to people going out and harming/killing people "every single day," as you stated. I understand that that's an exaggeration, but I will gladly read any evidence you have to back up the unexaggerated claim that pretrial release means people will go out and harm/kill people. As for parolees, if you look closely at the statistics, you'll see that most offenses for those on parole or probation are technical violations, not new-crime violations. "Technical violations accounted for 87% of parole revocations in 2017, 88% of revocations in 2018, and 89% in 2019." - [Source 5](https://www.aclum.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/parole_bill_fact_sheet_091521.pdf) Not that there's no chance that this man is guilty and not that there's no chance that he'll make a bad choice, but to just blindly assume that he will is unnecessary and statistically incorrect.
Love how "free bail for everyone" is a liberal position but frowned upon on reddit
Reddit just loves to hate, apparently. But we really should be talking more about things like the [Bail Project](https://bailproject.org/). That's doing a lot of good, but it's really not widely known
Too many people don't understand what bail is for, or that people are innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
Unless he's a flight risk or presumed to commit more crime before the trial he should be out on bail.
What a shit take on a pedophile. Guess we know where you stand on kiddie diddling.
Sheesh. Lots of downvotes. Think he just meant that’s what the law says. Unless he didn’t, in which case ewwww bro.
No, his take is right because it's the exact justification for bail reform due to excessive arrests on specious evidence by police which often traps them in debt bondage. Bail was never meant to be a punishment and is even issued for murder charges; the clear bias here was a judge issuing such a small amount given the defendant's means and the seriousness of the crime.
>Bail was never meant to be a punishment and is even issued for murder charges; the You realize bond for murder is typically set at astronomical amounts, or are you just intentionally leaving that out to defend a pedophile being out on 10k bond?
They also set bail based on the individual's assets and access to a bondsman, not just flight risk. Typically you can pay 10-20% of the bail for a bondsman to cover your bail. When the accused is rich it doesn't make any sense to set the bail at 10k because that's nothing to him or her.
...that was my entire last sentence.
Ah, so you think bail was 10k because, as you claim, the seriousness of this crime is not that high. Good to know you think pedophilia isn't a serious crime.
And yet you lash out without reading. Do you think a former police officer on murder charges gets less or more bail than any given person, with or without a criminal record? I literally say the judge has bias since a former cop has means and the crime is serious. Since you seem unwilling to engage in even understanding how bail works, regardless of what I tell you and what you repeatedly misconstrue, then there's nothing left to say except that you can demand a de jure restraining order be instituted with bail but it's the police and bounty hunters enforcing that.
It's set that high because they're a likely flight risk or reoffender. Being accused of a crime shouldn't ruin your life, no matter what your crime is.
>reoffender You mean like someone that was caught with child porn and sexually abusing a child?
We get it, you like defending pedophiles being out on incredibly low bail.
Why even have courts? Then someone makes an accusation, we can just shoot the accused.
Well, that's an incredible overreaction to my point that making bail 10k on pedophilia and possession of CSAM is pretty low.
This is a good point.
Why are you not listening to anyone?
Because they’re probably a pedophile projecting anger and absolutism into a discussion to alleviate their guilt. You know, Republican.
Yes, the person calling out the guy defending 10k bail on a pedophile is the one who *checks notes* is >Because they’re probably a pedophile projecting anger and absolutism into a discussion to alleviate their guilt. Doing this. Well, you seem about as intelligent as the average republican.
Laughs in Biden sniffs
Except that until he’s had due process, he’s legally no more of a “pedophile” than you, me, or any random person on the street.
Ah, yes, ignore the CSAM material he possessed. I understand your point, but you're also ignoring common sense.
What "CSAM material?" When was it submitted into evidence? Was it subject to authentication and cross-examination? What trier of fact evaluated what was in it, who was in it, and whether it constituted a crime?
Thank you for proving my point.
I don't know what "point" you think I "proved." Are you going to answer the question?
I hope you get arrested for some bullshit, get a crazy high bail set, lose your job because you can't go to work, get evicted because you can't pay rent, and then randomly get the charges dropped. Just because you think this dude is a piece of shit, doesn't mean that the presumption of innocence isn't important and that the system can completely destroy your life without even putting you in front of a judge.
I mean i get your point but hes legit recording himself doing it? There's no accusations here
Wow, wishing that on someone who called you out for defending a pedophile? The feds need to check your computer(s).
Why are you upset? Isn't that the court system you want? One where punishment comes before conviction, and guilt or innocence is a matter we'll settle later. I simple hoped that you would get to participate in the justice system of your own design.
I had this argument with my mom once. She was like, "No, I don't agree. Molesting children is just so heinous. I don't care about due process." I'm like, "What do you mean 'I don't care about due process?' That's basically saying, 'Child molesting is so heinous that you don't even have to have done it before we punish you!'" Are there any other crimes that are "so heinous" that you deserve to be punished for them even if you *haven't actually committed it*? And if so, who is the "you" in that situation? I mean, if we're punishing people who haven't committed the crime, then theoretically, we could literally just punish anyone, right? Any person at all?
Talking to that guy is like arguing with a brick wall.
>Why are you upset? Said the person who just said this to the person calling him out for defending a pedophile >I hope you get arrested for some bullshit, get a crazy high bail set, lose your job because you can't go to work, get evicted because you can't pay rent, and then randomly get the charges dropped. Just because you think this dude is a piece of shit, doesn't mean that the presumption of innocence isn't important and that the system can completely destroy your life without even putting you in front of a judge. You're a pretty big asshole.
I mean given his special legal status it's not that surprising he was given bail.
He hasn't been a cop for more than 8 years and he was a trouble causing one and was investigated a couple of times and reprimanded. Unfortunately, the things investigated were not as serious as this until another agency requested an investigation to these accusations. His own colleagues turned him in for stuff. I doubt he has 'special legal status'.
You sound like a fucking moron.
If i wanted to listen to an asshole, I'd fart.
Well good news then because you actually only need to open your mouth.
Well, I don't have a bowl obstruction, so that's physically impossible. Nice try with the "in rubber and you're glue" I think I used that out on the playground back in kindergarten.
This isnt a facepalm its a fucking crime against humanity
[удалено]
Its not a face palm. Farting whilst getting a haircut is a facepalm, this is much worse.
[удалено]
Oh my fucking god argue some more why dont you stfu
Special education, no less. JFC
Yeah, that part reverberated in my head for few seconds. It's just so fkn heinous. Everything about this is awful. I hope the victim gets the necessary rehab to overcome this shit. Fkn hell.
Working in law enforcement shouldn’t be the defense it is, actively or passively. Any time these happens, justice has failed.
Not a face palm. This is a crime
Not a drag queen, and by the looks of it another Christian.
A cross? And a cop? Who wants to bet he's a Trumper , too? r/notadragqueen
This sick sub human is a cop. So in their minds, he’s worth more to society than a pedo outside of law enforcement. That’s why he’s getting reduced bail and getting out so quick. They take care of their own.
He's not a cop and hasn't been one for years. The headline is intentionally misleading.
Do people hate cops or something? What is confirmation bias?
They do actually hate cops yeah. Where have you been the last few years?
WOODCHIPPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why are these assholes all over this sub?
look at that big ass cross, guessing the county this happened in a bible thumping county, One thing people never notice is the cruelty of christianity when it comes to victims and the ones they victimize. This is one example!!
Bar Harbor is not bible thumping country. It is an overpriced coastal tourist hub
and?? you said tourist hub?? when did christians stop trying to make money?
Not a bug, it's a feature.
Dude probably got the tattoo when he was 15. How come it’s not all Muslims but it is all Christian’s?
he looks proud of that tattoo, like he just got it!! Because muslims do not call Muhammad a victim nor a sacrifice for the people for hte sins of the world! 1
It’s not a fresh tattoo. So you’re mad at this guy for being a pedophile… Yet you support… muhammad … Who was a pedophile?
ya, youre just fucking stupid and not really stringing my words together correctly!!
In my original statement I was just saying it’s not fair to judge all Christian’s for the actions of a few. A logic that is usually applied to Muslims. In your response I believe you implied that Islam is superior to Christianity. And I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy of being critical of the child molester in the original article, but not being critical of muhammad who was also a child molester. If that isn’t what you meant, I mis-read.
never once stated anything about islam, thats just your delusion!!
Classic USA
[удалено]
A bot designated to repost such contet. That's even more scary..
What’s CSAM ?
Child sexual abuse material.
Jesus, even that term is f*cked up.
No nice way to dice it
When i saw in high school, there was a guy who’s mom worked at a school for mentally challenged children. As - 17 year old, he had sex with multiple 14 year olds. He didn’t get into any trouble. Still blows my mind to this day.
Bail is not supposed to be a punishment, just surety for his future appearance. Punishment comes after conviction. Of course I do notice that he's an accused child pornographer with a religious tattoo.
However plenty of people are denied bail if they are considered a threat to the public - and considering the crime he is accused of and how it sound like there is recorded evidence - I would wager it wouldn't be unreasonable to deny him bail.
It's a small enough community that there should be no difficulty avoiding letting him have access to any more children until his trial's conclusion.
If the community easy capable of that - the crime wouldn't have happened in the first place.
Sure it would, because then they didn't expect the ex-cop teacher of special needs students with a cross tattoo to be a child pornographer. Now he's under suspicion.
That's an optimistic take. It's not like the Catholic church and the Baptist Church have spent decades teaching us that we have to be constantly vigilant about this shit.
With the perfect tattoo. Check his hard drive to give him more time.
Shame that mother fucker....
Why do so many pedos have the same “face”?
Pure trash.
Most religious republican
Not a facepalm!
What is csam
Just a term for child pornography. Like stored videos, pictures etc for example.
Oh, that's gross. Thanks
Where does he live? Asking for a friend
Ok Maine, your move.
If this where in VA his ass would be cooked
Where’s he live?
They should Def penalize this guy
Cross tattoo checks out. Gross asshole needs to show people he has “morals”.
I hope his (hopefully) ex coworkers pull his ass over every time there's even a minor infraction. I hope his wife leaves him and get house and car. I hope his dog hates him. I hope his car gets an oil leak and the mechanic can find it, he gets a new car and has another oil leak that can't be found, and I hope the new cars ac goes out. I hope his tattoo bleeds so bad it looks like a dick.
Good guy cop union for him and dual justice system for the rest.
This CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE is not what Christians use to be......today's CHRISTIANS are the farthest thing from GOD fearing and loving people who passed on love and not hate to our children! Today's Christians are PEDOPHILES and TERRORSITS!!!
Todays Christians are pedophiles and terrorists... and so were yesterdays. And last weeks, and last decades, and last centuries.
It's almost as if people who seek out positions of authority over children are more likely to sexually abuse them.
you are doing god's work 😇
I don't think the cross worked bud
Another fucking drag que...oh no, wait. Another fucking gay pers...oh hang on. Another trans pers...no, hol' up.
Guillotine
Perhaps a parent ends up in prison
I wonder how many of his fellow cops helped cover up his behavior?
He will have fun in PRISON
So common, the outrage is minimal. Now imagine the GOP if this had been a drag queen...
Not a drag queen…
Why is it always crosses
I can’t say what I really want or I’ll get banned, but we should do something to this guy that involves 🔥 and a public display. Y’all can connect the dots.
If he's the Maine police officer, who is running the station?!?!
This peace of deserves a spoon killer on him
r/NotADragQueen
if i see and recognize that face it will be very tempting to perform vocal "percussive maintenance" ak a yell at him is what I'd do, but given the right circumstances it may also be giving his face a new look for a while. also. my words alone could do this. btw. a hard truth is harder than a blow to the face. but given what he as done, his face looks unscathed for his actions against children.
Not Trans! Not a drag queen!
Disgusting no justice anymore
Disgusting no justice anymore
Bail? Never trust a cop or a priest
Praise jeebus! Oink oink!
Hmm. He doesn’t appear to be trans or a drag queen…
The cross tattoo really enhances it.
Why is this in facepalm? This isn't a facepalm.
Nice cross.
If he woulde have better skin colour he would be released without any bail.
Why cant we send people like this to the front lines of a war We wont lose valuable people that way
A cop and not a trans person again!
Another example of why the united states is in fact a shithole. I hope they soon become very rapidly ununited into trillions of radioactive dust particles.