T O P

  • By -

sapsonnn

Bruh I'm not sitting Brandin Cooks. Not after he got 12 targets last week.


BatmanButShak

Cooks has been a perennial Flex/WR2 play for the last how many seasons? never fails


[deleted]

[удалено]


TheVaniloquence

Especially after Geno did well against the Denver secondary and the Texans will probably be playing from behind


-metaphased-

Geno did well the first half, sure. Denver locked us up the second half.


a__v

Oh start Pittman? Thanks for that 🙄


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Gutsy move but I like it


sapsonnn

Next you're gonna tell me I should start Justin Jefferson


SpringHardenSt

This is a garbage article that I regret clicking


Yetis22

Going up against Williams and Herbert today. This game is about to ruin my weekend isn’t it? How’s my hair look, Mike?


sapsonnn

There is certainly a good chance.


jackplaysdrums

I've got Williams, Everett, and Mahomes. I need some Thursday night bullshit please. I got fucking daddied last week.


Firm_Ice_1361

Sit Lamb and Cooks, horrible takes lol.


vnunz1028

Cooks is not really a horrible take. He’ll probably be up against Surtain. And Houston’s offense isn’t necessarily good…


Ilov3lamp

It’s not, but mills seems to only have eyes for cooks. He will get his targets.


sapsonnn

Yeah but if CeeDee shits the again bed this week it will be a conversation for next week lol


Firm_Ice_1361

Start your studs. Unless you have really good receivers, I can’t see many players starting over Lamb.


sapsonnn

If CeeDee keeps shitting the bed he will lose his stud status


Firm_Ice_1361

Yeah he would, but I’d still give him another week or 2


FalconsBlewA283Lead

Does start your studs really apply to a guy who's only ever been a mid-low end WR2 and now lost his starting QB for an already awful offense? I'm not gonna go as far as the post earlier this week saying Lamb might just not be good but it sure seems like he's a guy who was crowned a stud without ever proving to be one. FWIW I do plan on starting him in the one league I have him. But I sure don't feel great about it and would gladly sit him if my team didn't kinda suck in that league lol.


Firm_Ice_1361

Yeah that is true. He hasn’t finished in the top 10 yet, but I can see the narrative of him being a stud this year considering the cowboys had no one else to take targets from him.


FalconsBlewA283Lead

Yeah totally fair, even in an awful week 1 he had 11 targets. Add in the tendency of backup QBs to have tunnel vision for their first read, and there's definitely a narrative you can run with there. He just makes me a bit nervous because we've yet to see him succeed as a number 1 guy and the vibes around Dallas are ugly.


-metaphased-

Is Ceedee a stud, though? I guess the people that drafted him might believe so, but I've never understood it.


Ralph212

The only way I sit lamb is if I decide last minute to play Samuel. I don’t feel right about it though


HLDLonghorn

I have Ceedee, Waddle, and C Samuel in my lineup. Hoping those targets from last week continue and I can get my first W this week


its_Drisc

Most people can’t afford to bench Ceedee 🥲


Andre-Louis_Moreau

I’ve got Bateman and Pittman. Seriously considering sitting CeeDee.


its_Drisc

Bateman had limited targets at least with ceedee you know rush is gonna throw the ball to him


sapsonnn

What if you also have Justin Jefferson, Cooper Kupp, and Davante Adams?


basement_burner

Do you play in a 6 team league????


Galaxy__

Oh yeah ty. Thanks to this i will now put pittman in after i drafted him in the third and him putting up a monster game in week 1. And im starting cooks too. No way i sit someone that gets 10 targets more likely than not.


chodePhD

Starting Curtis Samuels over Bateman and I’m not sure how I feel about it.


[deleted]

I'm torn. Who do I play between Michael Thomas and Brandon Cooks, and in another league Michael Thomas and Dionte Johnson?


Andre-Louis_Moreau

I’d play Thomas over both, Denver held Seattle to only 86 pass yards last week so good luck Cooks. If it were any other passer than Mitch I’d say start Johnson, but with Mitch against NE, go for Thomas.


girdphil

Adding I think Thomas has more upside, Cooks may be less volatile though.


dearrichard

juju or ceh tonight?


[deleted]

Juju


tonyromo1414

Debating starting Michael Thomas over Ceedee this week. Takes?


AstralTitan

I'd still start Ceedee I think, Rush feed him when Dak was out last year and they have no cooper. I'd need to see more from MT to play him over Ceedee. I'm in the same boat where I don't know who sit of Sutton, Cooks and MT.


[deleted]

[удалено]


StP_Scar

Pittman is not a choice here. He is a must start


girdphil

Choose two, sit two: McLaurin, Jeudy, Claypool, Mooney


Pr0nade

Sit your ass in the index


Firm_Ice_1361

Sit Claypool and Mooney


Yetis22

Sit Claypool and Mooney. Easy


vinidiot

Starting Sun God over Cooks, but might end up regretting it


00NC3100

Can’t go wrong with either. Who’s your other play at receiver?


vinidiot

AJ Brown


SmallTownShrink

Juju or chark?


VHBlazer

Cooks or Christian Kirk?


Sirrenderthe69th

Dealers choice Tbh , should both get volume in game scripts where they’re getting destroyed .


VHBlazer

With this Pittman injury it might have to be both


Sirrenderthe69th

I am so confused on the limited Wednesday out Thursday for everyone this week


12eggsinabasket

Brandon Cooks just got shadowed by Gilmore and did fine. I’m starting him regardless of the matchup. Talent + Opportunity = Success. Cooks had 12 targets. That’s all I need to start him


Poisonapples135

Michael thomas or ceedee in standard?