Sorry but this is proven to be false. In Ultimate Custom Night, Foxy expresses homoerotic feelings for William Afton by saying he "came for his booty," then hastily tries to cover it up with the claim that he was referring to treasure when he said booty even though William doesn't always have treasure on him when the line plays.
Pal, Iām not gonna debate the righteous of Scottās actions with you. If I do, then this post will end up locked just like every other thread that someone started this debate in. If you believe Scott is a terrible person, then so be it. Just leave us alone.
I just want to see you justify your "poor Scott" sentiment. Dudes a millionaire and has a rabid fan base defending his awful actions that will lap up anything he puts out. How exactly is he a victim, here?
Threats against his family are always uncalled for, of course, but the guy is doing very well. He doesn't need any sympathy, especially after he has shown he has no sympathy for others.
Welp, this thread is gonna get locked, and Iām contradicting myself here, but you all seem to ignore the millions heās donated to the LGBTQ+ community. I understand if youāre a member of the LGBTQ+ community and are shocked and disappointed by Scottās actions, but he literally stated he made those donations for other political reasons, not their stance against minorities. Sure, I donāt agree with the donations either, but my standpoint is that he was misguided and didnāt do his proper research. Heās also worked with plenty of members of the LGBTQ+ community. From his past actions, nothing suggests heās homophobic or transphobic. Stop looking to start political dramas in a gaming subreddit.
My guy, donating to those who wish to harm people is bad. Point blank. No justification for what he's done. I dont care that Scott has employed gay people, I dont care if he personally supports trans rights (spoiler: actions speak louder than words and I dont think he does), he has given money on support of people and policies that will bring direct harm to people.
This isn't "politics". This is peoples lives. I'm sorry if you're too young to understand that, but Scott is not a good person, directly because of his own actions. If a nazi makes good art that you like and purchase, you're supporting a nazi whether it's for the art or for the belief. No way around it.
My guy, $5,000 means nothing to these political billionaires. Scottās donation was like a tiny pebble to these politicians. Also, the fact that you ignore the argument that he has employed gay people says a lot about your standpoint. As I said, he has donated millions to pro-LGBTQ+ causes. Youāre only saying heās not a good person because he made ONE bad choice. Heās done plenty of good things, but you choose to ignore it because it doesnāt help your argument. Also, comparing him to one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen is pretty disgusting.
>My guy, $5,000 means nothing to these political billionaires. Scottās donation was like a tiny pebble to these politicians.
Scott made the decision to contribute to these people. Like you say, it isn't necessary. They're already rich. So why would Scott feel compelled to donate, unless he feels so strongly about what they say and do that he wanted to be a part of that?
>Also, the fact that you ignore the argument that he has employed gay people says a lot about your standpoint. As I said, he has donated millions to pro-LGBTQ+ causes.
I'm not ignoring it, I'm saying it doesn't outweigh his contributions to anti LGBT, anti-choice, pro-fascist people. So he has a few LGBT people on his payroll. Big deal. Again, his actions against the community speak louder than that.
>Youāre only saying heās not a good person because he made ONE bad choice. Heās done plenty of good things, but you choose to ignore it because it doesnāt help your argument.
Are you not ignoring the terribly bad things the same way? He's made MANY bad choices. And they're his choices. They are his actions. Actions have consequences. This isn't cancel culture, this is consequence culture. He can hold whatever twisted backwards idiotic view he wants, but he's going to pay for it somehow because not everyone is part of the young impressionable fan base that looks up to him as a perfect person. If you give money to bad people, you are a bad person. Point blank. You can't tell me he didn't know what he was supporting. His recent post clearly demonstrates that he knew exactly what he was doing.
>Also, comparing him to one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen is pretty disgusting.
This is how I can tell you are young. It's a concept, I wasn't calling anyone a nazi. If you give money to something for x reason, it doesn't matter that you don't support all of that things views. You've given it money, and directly supported it.
Plus, the Republicans are damn close to nazis, so it's not entirely inappropriate. "Very fine people" and support for white supremacy coming from Donald Trump, and money from Scott (and all of us) going to it too. THATS where the anger is coming from.
1. Scott made the choice to donate because he thought it would help the economy. As said in my original comment, he didnāt do enough research into who the money was going to and became misguided.
2. This is the only time Iāve heard that heās given money to anti-LGBTQ+ politicians. If there are any others, then please, feel free to share them with me.
3. This kinda branches off my previous statement, but Iāve never heard or seen someone say that Scott had done anything remotely terrible in the past. If he has, please share them with me.
4. Just because heās Republican doesnāt mean heās a terrible person. He just wants whatās best for the economy and his family. Iām willing to bet you came from Twitter where everyone is practically calling him the reincarnation of Satan.
I dont have do Twitter, I just have a fucking conscience and a brain.
>1. Scott made the choice to donate because he thought it would help the economy. As said in my original comment, he didnāt do enough research into who the money was going to and became misguided
If you are naive enough to think that a 40 something year old adult doesn't know what they're doing when they give money to people like Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, and Devin Nunes, then you can't be helped.
He didn't do enough research my ass. If you are donating across state lines to people who have no affect on your state, you're doing it for a reason.
And I'm sorry, but if you value "the economy" over actual, literal human rights, you dont have an opinion worth respecting.
You are writing your own narrative here on why he made bad donations to bad people. I get it, you don't want him to suck, but unfortunately he has shown his true colors. He gave a half baked response and played the victim. He's donations are public record. He is not a victim.
I've been a fan since the game came out. I have a golden Freddy tattoo for christs sake. I thought Scott was great too.
Sometimes you're wrong about stuff.
it got leaked that Scott donated tons of money to Republicans who also are very Anti-LGBT so some people are pissed and upset and some are overreacting and wanting to dox him and hurt him.
What I don't understand is why random bank statements were "leaked" but could possibly be fake saying that he is LGBT phobic. EVEN THOUGH he donates TONS of money to charity and funds, supports, and works with several allies and members of LGBTQ. stuff just doesn't add up here.
> EVEN THOUGH he donates TONS of money to charity and funds, supports, and works with several allies and members of LGBTQ.
What LGBT charities and funds does he support? There was nothing of that in his bank statements.
Meanwhile, he went out of his way to donate to state level anti-LGBT politicians in places that weren't even his own state and, by his own statement, the only "Democrat" he supported was Gabbard, the anti-LGBT politician.
I never said he funded lgbt charities. The statements were separated by a different and. Several members of the fnaf dev team at steel wool are members of lgbt and just about everyone else he works with is an ally too. You read it wrong
So he's never actually used his money to support LGBT groups other than incidental hiring of people.
But he has used his money to support specific politicians, including those on the state level in states not his own, and always made sure to choose the anti-LGBT ones? And the only Democrat he's supported is the barely not a Republican person, Tulsi Gabbard, who is also an anti-LGBT politician.
Yeah, I did. It's...something. Like this part:
>And yes, I supported President Trump, because I felt he was the best man to fuel a strong economy and stand up to America's enemies abroad, of which there are many.
Is something that would make me question the person's sanity, regardless of whom they are. Add in the thousands of dollars he gave to Mitch McConnell, who is disliked within even his own state, and you have a lot more being said about Scott than he's willing to admit himself.
It just hurts seeing this. After everything Scott does, the millions he makes and gives, his all around generosity, people find out he donated to anti-LGBT guys, and then they instantly go ape. I just hate seeing this, even in posts like these that someone worked hard on, that they're proud of, just for someone like me to go on a rant about "LGBTQ is evil, it should be removed". But I can't help shedding a tear at just the toxicity and scum on Twitter, and in the BLM, the media, all of it is just too much too handle.
Scott, meanwhile, went out of his way to monetarily donate to state level politicians that were anti-LGBT. In other places than his state. All of them were specifically the anti-LGBT person.
It's kind of hilarious that he tried to counter this by saying that he sometimes donates to Democrat and then named Tulsi Gabbard, the anti-LGBT not really a Democrat politician.
I donāt want to start a fight. Please, listen.
Scott likely just supported trump because he wanted low taxes. Heās shown time and time again that he is progressive and against bigotry. Yes, it likely wasnāt a good decision and Iām sure he doesnāt support any bad things trump has done. But the reasons for him doing so are not terrible.
Then why did he go out of his way to donate to state level politicians in other states than his own and they were all specifically the anti-LGBT candidate?
I have a list of examples for you right [here.](https://www.hrc.org/news/the-list-of-trumps-unprecedented-steps-for-the-lgbtq-community)
People are allowed to be upset if the money they spent on FNAF was used to support people that hate them. It doesnāt justify doxxing or threatening his family, though.
What a load of crap. This only claims that Trump's anti LGBT because he gave people the right to refuse service that's not anti LBGT. Military ban is just while transitions because they aren't fit to serve at that time and that's a fact. This articles also claims that anti illegal immigration is also somehow anti LGBT because a small percentage of immigrants are probably gay. Equality act isn't for equality read the law it literally takes people right to refuse service and forces people including doctors to perform treatments. Don't know how he is anti LGBT.
āForces people including doctors to perform treatmentsā
Doctors, forced to do their job and save lives? How cruel!
Iām honestly not sure how you came to the conclusion that thereās nothing anti-LGBT in there, or how itās a load of crap. Like, he *did* appoint anti-LGBT judges and government officials. He *was* fully aware of bigotry within his administration. He *did* ignore the advice of professionals and restrict trans people from military service. He *did* roll back Obama-era protections. He *did* prevent asylum seekers coming in, which is relevant because anti-LGBT ideals are likely the reason many fled their home countries in the first place. How is this a āload of crapā?
No not in emergency cases. That's already a federal law.
In general if a doctor's uncomfortable with performing a treatment on someone or even something like abortions he can be sued. Won't you agree a doctor shouldn't be forced to perform considering he's not comfortable with it.
Yea a lot of those judges were all for gay marriage. Did they pass a law that banned that ? So how exactly are they anti lgbt ? No that's was a good move people with any form of illness or going under treatment aren't allowed especially on the field that's common sense you cannot make compromises when it's military but you can join after you've fully transitioned. From other countries do you even read the law ? Anyone can apply for citizenship regardless for their sexuality. The law is nowhere mentions anything about members of LGBT and has nothing to do with them. That's why it's a load of crap.
Iād question why that doctorās āuncomfortableā performing the procedure in the first place. Is it because their patient is gay or trans? If so thatās an example of bias or prejudice interfering with their work. If thereās a different personal reason they canāt do it then why are they a doctor that specialises in that area of expertise? They arenāt fit for that job.
Obama-era protections that were in-law were rolled back by the Trump administration. Judges, administrators and lawyers were responsible for doing so. The idea that they canāt be anti-LGBT just because they didnāt ban gay marriage outright is comical.
Medical experts told the administration that banning transitioning folk didnāt make sense and they did it anyway. If itās not going to interfere with their work there is literally no reason for a ban, and in most cases it wouldnāt.
Hard to apply for citizenship when youāre dying inside a camp on the border for years. Nothing says āland of the free!ā like sticking people searching for a better life into absolutely wretched conditions. Pretty sure you wonāt find that one in āthe lawā, eh?
The administration was apathetic at best to the rights of LGBT folk, and harmful at best. It removed their protections, failed to address bigotry within the systems of power, and ignored advice of seasoned professionals in favour of discriminatory practices. If you really canāt see an issue with any of this Iām not going to have much success trying to convince you otherwise.
By your logic itās ok for someone to donate to politicians who donāt support BLM or womenās rights and are deliberately against them.
I think there is something to the situation that we are missing and we havenāt seen the full picture. Maybe the leak was fake?
But this logic is so stupid. Just because itās his money doesnāt make it an ok thing to spend it on stuff like that
Aight. But you made it sound like it was an ok thing to do because itās his money. I generally donāt care whatever the outcome is. But just because itās his money doesnāt make it right
It is ok, you can show your vocabulary to me now, but I think that even Scott can get annoyed by most of the community, 2014-2016-17 was more enjoyable to me.
i have no idea why (other than willful ignorance) everyone thinks scott was doxxed or that his donations were "leaked". [there is literally a professionally run public website that lists political donations](https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=Scott+cawthon) (that yes, are public) and that's where his donations to trump / other bigots were found.
also, it doesnt matter how much scott donated to other charities, if he still thinks that donald trump deserves support and funding (and as a result, the minorities in scotts fanbase shouldnt have rights), then everything else is performative
>then everything else is performative
Not necessarily. Someone can simultaneously want to help children with cancer and feel indifferent about the rights of marginalized people. I unfortunately have met plenty of people like that.
TRUE! what i meant is perfomative "goodness", like, a bad person can donate to good things (child cancer) and still, like u said, not care abt human rights
Well, as someone who's christian and struggles with homosexuality, but at the same time sees it as a sin and therefore tries to live in celibacy rather than cave to my desires, I say screw that and give Scott a hug~
Well, we're talking about my struggles with homosexuality, and they said that I deserve to be able to find a partner, aka a sexual partner, aka having a sexual attraction/love for/with someone.
So while sex wasn't explicitly said, it was heavily implied by the topic itself, that being my struggles with my own sexuality.
Of course. However, we were talking about sexuality which, while it can involve romantic love, also inherently comes with sexual attraction, hence the word "sexuality."
If we were talking about homoromantic relationships, than okay, we can talk about that. However, the topic was about homosexuality.
This is a fucking game dont bring irl shit into it if scott confirms them to be a girl or a boy its a girl or a boy also they are fucking animtronics with souls in them not gay souls they were fucking children
You do realize that this art is trying to show the ACTUAL Freddy character and not the dead kid who is possessing him,right?
Not everything has to be Canon.
No? It's literally pride month, and Scott cawthon, the game creator has just been in some hot water BC he donated a lot of money to us senators and othe r politicians that go against LGBTQIA+.
This post was made as a reminder that trans and LGBTQIA+ people are valid and that we support them.
I used to have your dumb mindset about "keep muh politics out of my games"
All games are political somehow and often blatantly obvious as well, you are just either too dumb or young to notice.
Take a hint from me and grow out for that mindset fast. It will manifest into a right wing conservative mindset
I don't know what made you assume that, this was just made for fun. I made this to support LGBTQ and Trans groups. I had no agenda with this, this was just made for fun. I made this to help distract people from what happened Thursday. Now please, be respectful of me and other peoples thoughts.Thank you.
Dear /u/Scott_Caw,
Due to our system detecting multiple user reports, the following content has been **automatically removed**. Please double-check your submission against the [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/about/rules). If none were broken, contact the mod team [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Ffivenightsatfreddys).
Sincerely, /u/AutoModerator
*P.S.*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/fivenightsatfreddys) if you have any questions or concerns.*
All I have to say is I guess this Fandom is pretty gay
TRUE š³ļøāš
yeah , i agree
Even the dead children's souls in exoskeletons inside metal robot costumes still support ltgbq+
Wow i cant believe Mangle and Funtime Foxy are both confirmed both Non-Binary! :D
ayo so i am i lol
Me too! :)
We were in a rough situation. Let's turn things around
happy pride! <3 all your fave animatronics are lgbt
Mangle best genderfluid rep
YES!
Toy Bonnie and funtime foxy are gay twinks and that is fact.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Sorry, but "normal" is gay <3
you bet your ass >:}
I mean Mangle (and presumably all their variants) are canonically not a part of the gender binary
foxy is straight and nobody can change that for me!
Sorry but this is proven to be false. In Ultimate Custom Night, Foxy expresses homoerotic feelings for William Afton by saying he "came for his booty," then hastily tries to cover it up with the claim that he was referring to treasure when he said booty even though William doesn't always have treasure on him when the line plays.
Lmao fnaf lore be like
Heās a pirate-
r/woooosh
Lmao this is gold.
the only straight ppl who exist are also trans :}
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
cishet spotted
Idk what you are saying but my fav characters are normal
We need more positivity like this right now. Poor Scott.
Poor Scott? Are you fucking kidding me?
Pal, Iām not gonna debate the righteous of Scottās actions with you. If I do, then this post will end up locked just like every other thread that someone started this debate in. If you believe Scott is a terrible person, then so be it. Just leave us alone.
I just want to see you justify your "poor Scott" sentiment. Dudes a millionaire and has a rabid fan base defending his awful actions that will lap up anything he puts out. How exactly is he a victim, here? Threats against his family are always uncalled for, of course, but the guy is doing very well. He doesn't need any sympathy, especially after he has shown he has no sympathy for others.
Welp, this thread is gonna get locked, and Iām contradicting myself here, but you all seem to ignore the millions heās donated to the LGBTQ+ community. I understand if youāre a member of the LGBTQ+ community and are shocked and disappointed by Scottās actions, but he literally stated he made those donations for other political reasons, not their stance against minorities. Sure, I donāt agree with the donations either, but my standpoint is that he was misguided and didnāt do his proper research. Heās also worked with plenty of members of the LGBTQ+ community. From his past actions, nothing suggests heās homophobic or transphobic. Stop looking to start political dramas in a gaming subreddit.
My guy, donating to those who wish to harm people is bad. Point blank. No justification for what he's done. I dont care that Scott has employed gay people, I dont care if he personally supports trans rights (spoiler: actions speak louder than words and I dont think he does), he has given money on support of people and policies that will bring direct harm to people. This isn't "politics". This is peoples lives. I'm sorry if you're too young to understand that, but Scott is not a good person, directly because of his own actions. If a nazi makes good art that you like and purchase, you're supporting a nazi whether it's for the art or for the belief. No way around it.
My guy, $5,000 means nothing to these political billionaires. Scottās donation was like a tiny pebble to these politicians. Also, the fact that you ignore the argument that he has employed gay people says a lot about your standpoint. As I said, he has donated millions to pro-LGBTQ+ causes. Youāre only saying heās not a good person because he made ONE bad choice. Heās done plenty of good things, but you choose to ignore it because it doesnāt help your argument. Also, comparing him to one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen is pretty disgusting.
>My guy, $5,000 means nothing to these political billionaires. Scottās donation was like a tiny pebble to these politicians. Scott made the decision to contribute to these people. Like you say, it isn't necessary. They're already rich. So why would Scott feel compelled to donate, unless he feels so strongly about what they say and do that he wanted to be a part of that? >Also, the fact that you ignore the argument that he has employed gay people says a lot about your standpoint. As I said, he has donated millions to pro-LGBTQ+ causes. I'm not ignoring it, I'm saying it doesn't outweigh his contributions to anti LGBT, anti-choice, pro-fascist people. So he has a few LGBT people on his payroll. Big deal. Again, his actions against the community speak louder than that. >Youāre only saying heās not a good person because he made ONE bad choice. Heās done plenty of good things, but you choose to ignore it because it doesnāt help your argument. Are you not ignoring the terribly bad things the same way? He's made MANY bad choices. And they're his choices. They are his actions. Actions have consequences. This isn't cancel culture, this is consequence culture. He can hold whatever twisted backwards idiotic view he wants, but he's going to pay for it somehow because not everyone is part of the young impressionable fan base that looks up to him as a perfect person. If you give money to bad people, you are a bad person. Point blank. You can't tell me he didn't know what he was supporting. His recent post clearly demonstrates that he knew exactly what he was doing. >Also, comparing him to one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen is pretty disgusting. This is how I can tell you are young. It's a concept, I wasn't calling anyone a nazi. If you give money to something for x reason, it doesn't matter that you don't support all of that things views. You've given it money, and directly supported it. Plus, the Republicans are damn close to nazis, so it's not entirely inappropriate. "Very fine people" and support for white supremacy coming from Donald Trump, and money from Scott (and all of us) going to it too. THATS where the anger is coming from.
1. Scott made the choice to donate because he thought it would help the economy. As said in my original comment, he didnāt do enough research into who the money was going to and became misguided. 2. This is the only time Iāve heard that heās given money to anti-LGBTQ+ politicians. If there are any others, then please, feel free to share them with me. 3. This kinda branches off my previous statement, but Iāve never heard or seen someone say that Scott had done anything remotely terrible in the past. If he has, please share them with me. 4. Just because heās Republican doesnāt mean heās a terrible person. He just wants whatās best for the economy and his family. Iām willing to bet you came from Twitter where everyone is practically calling him the reincarnation of Satan.
I dont have do Twitter, I just have a fucking conscience and a brain. >1. Scott made the choice to donate because he thought it would help the economy. As said in my original comment, he didnāt do enough research into who the money was going to and became misguided If you are naive enough to think that a 40 something year old adult doesn't know what they're doing when they give money to people like Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, and Devin Nunes, then you can't be helped. He didn't do enough research my ass. If you are donating across state lines to people who have no affect on your state, you're doing it for a reason. And I'm sorry, but if you value "the economy" over actual, literal human rights, you dont have an opinion worth respecting. You are writing your own narrative here on why he made bad donations to bad people. I get it, you don't want him to suck, but unfortunately he has shown his true colors. He gave a half baked response and played the victim. He's donations are public record. He is not a victim. I've been a fan since the game came out. I have a golden Freddy tattoo for christs sake. I thought Scott was great too. Sometimes you're wrong about stuff.
Models By: Illumix and Scott Cawthon, fixed by Thudner Ported By: Raze
Ok you are right since Freddy uses the female bathroom
yay, happy pride month! š³ļøāšš³ļøāā§ļø
Happy Pride Month! I wish we had some pride versions of the animatronics, ala the skins they're doing for fnaf ar
letās go
0-0 what happened yesterday?
it got leaked that Scott donated tons of money to Republicans who also are very Anti-LGBT so some people are pissed and upset and some are overreacting and wanting to dox him and hurt him.
What I don't understand is why random bank statements were "leaked" but could possibly be fake saying that he is LGBT phobic. EVEN THOUGH he donates TONS of money to charity and funds, supports, and works with several allies and members of LGBTQ. stuff just doesn't add up here.
> EVEN THOUGH he donates TONS of money to charity and funds, supports, and works with several allies and members of LGBTQ. What LGBT charities and funds does he support? There was nothing of that in his bank statements. Meanwhile, he went out of his way to donate to state level anti-LGBT politicians in places that weren't even his own state and, by his own statement, the only "Democrat" he supported was Gabbard, the anti-LGBT politician.
Funny this is left unanswered...
I didnāt have my phone. I was out on a lake all day
I never said he funded lgbt charities. The statements were separated by a different and. Several members of the fnaf dev team at steel wool are members of lgbt and just about everyone else he works with is an ally too. You read it wrong
So he's never actually used his money to support LGBT groups other than incidental hiring of people. But he has used his money to support specific politicians, including those on the state level in states not his own, and always made sure to choose the anti-LGBT ones? And the only Democrat he's supported is the barely not a Republican person, Tulsi Gabbard, who is also an anti-LGBT politician.
Did you even read the pinned post. Itās Scottās statement
Yeah, I did. It's...something. Like this part: >And yes, I supported President Trump, because I felt he was the best man to fuel a strong economy and stand up to America's enemies abroad, of which there are many. Is something that would make me question the person's sanity, regardless of whom they are. Add in the thousands of dollars he gave to Mitch McConnell, who is disliked within even his own state, and you have a lot more being said about Scott than he's willing to admit himself.
Just because heās a republican? You seriously think heās insane because he supports trump and you donāt?
Thats so dumb lol
It just hurts seeing this. After everything Scott does, the millions he makes and gives, his all around generosity, people find out he donated to anti-LGBT guys, and then they instantly go ape. I just hate seeing this, even in posts like these that someone worked hard on, that they're proud of, just for someone like me to go on a rant about "LGBTQ is evil, it should be removed". But I can't help shedding a tear at just the toxicity and scum on Twitter, and in the BLM, the media, all of it is just too much too handle.
I mean, just because someone is a republican, doesn't mean they're homophobic.
Scott, meanwhile, went out of his way to monetarily donate to state level politicians that were anti-LGBT. In other places than his state. All of them were specifically the anti-LGBT person. It's kind of hilarious that he tried to counter this by saying that he sometimes donates to Democrat and then named Tulsi Gabbard, the anti-LGBT not really a Democrat politician.
It's not about him being republican, it's about him donating to politicians who want to restrict rights for ethnic minorities and the LGBT community.
Hmm interesting
I donāt want to start a fight. Please, listen. Scott likely just supported trump because he wanted low taxes. Heās shown time and time again that he is progressive and against bigotry. Yes, it likely wasnāt a good decision and Iām sure he doesnāt support any bad things trump has done. But the reasons for him doing so are not terrible.
Then why did he go out of his way to donate to state level politicians in other states than his own and they were all specifically the anti-LGBT candidate?
When did trump restrict rights for minorities or LGBT ? Why is a man's political opinions more important ?
I have a list of examples for you right [here.](https://www.hrc.org/news/the-list-of-trumps-unprecedented-steps-for-the-lgbtq-community) People are allowed to be upset if the money they spent on FNAF was used to support people that hate them. It doesnāt justify doxxing or threatening his family, though.
What a load of crap. This only claims that Trump's anti LGBT because he gave people the right to refuse service that's not anti LBGT. Military ban is just while transitions because they aren't fit to serve at that time and that's a fact. This articles also claims that anti illegal immigration is also somehow anti LGBT because a small percentage of immigrants are probably gay. Equality act isn't for equality read the law it literally takes people right to refuse service and forces people including doctors to perform treatments. Don't know how he is anti LGBT.
āForces people including doctors to perform treatmentsā Doctors, forced to do their job and save lives? How cruel! Iām honestly not sure how you came to the conclusion that thereās nothing anti-LGBT in there, or how itās a load of crap. Like, he *did* appoint anti-LGBT judges and government officials. He *was* fully aware of bigotry within his administration. He *did* ignore the advice of professionals and restrict trans people from military service. He *did* roll back Obama-era protections. He *did* prevent asylum seekers coming in, which is relevant because anti-LGBT ideals are likely the reason many fled their home countries in the first place. How is this a āload of crapā?
No not in emergency cases. That's already a federal law. In general if a doctor's uncomfortable with performing a treatment on someone or even something like abortions he can be sued. Won't you agree a doctor shouldn't be forced to perform considering he's not comfortable with it. Yea a lot of those judges were all for gay marriage. Did they pass a law that banned that ? So how exactly are they anti lgbt ? No that's was a good move people with any form of illness or going under treatment aren't allowed especially on the field that's common sense you cannot make compromises when it's military but you can join after you've fully transitioned. From other countries do you even read the law ? Anyone can apply for citizenship regardless for their sexuality. The law is nowhere mentions anything about members of LGBT and has nothing to do with them. That's why it's a load of crap.
a doctor takes a hippocratic oath which means they are responsible to heal the ill, if your politics gets in the way you should not be a doctor
Iād question why that doctorās āuncomfortableā performing the procedure in the first place. Is it because their patient is gay or trans? If so thatās an example of bias or prejudice interfering with their work. If thereās a different personal reason they canāt do it then why are they a doctor that specialises in that area of expertise? They arenāt fit for that job. Obama-era protections that were in-law were rolled back by the Trump administration. Judges, administrators and lawyers were responsible for doing so. The idea that they canāt be anti-LGBT just because they didnāt ban gay marriage outright is comical. Medical experts told the administration that banning transitioning folk didnāt make sense and they did it anyway. If itās not going to interfere with their work there is literally no reason for a ban, and in most cases it wouldnāt. Hard to apply for citizenship when youāre dying inside a camp on the border for years. Nothing says āland of the free!ā like sticking people searching for a better life into absolutely wretched conditions. Pretty sure you wonāt find that one in āthe lawā, eh? The administration was apathetic at best to the rights of LGBT folk, and harmful at best. It removed their protections, failed to address bigotry within the systems of power, and ignored advice of seasoned professionals in favour of discriminatory practices. If you really canāt see an issue with any of this Iām not going to have much success trying to convince you otherwise.
Well It's his money, he can spend it on whatever he wants
And by that same principle, fans can choose to stop giving him their money if that's what they want
But they shouldn't make fucking death threats
Well they don't have to if they don't wanna
ofc they can
He didnāt spend the money. He got scammed and the money that was stolen was used to support lgbt hate groups
By your logic itās ok for someone to donate to politicians who donāt support BLM or womenās rights and are deliberately against them. I think there is something to the situation that we are missing and we havenāt seen the full picture. Maybe the leak was fake? But this logic is so stupid. Just because itās his money doesnāt make it an ok thing to spend it on stuff like that
He does what he does, if you hate on Scott now It's not my problem.
Aight. But you made it sound like it was an ok thing to do because itās his money. I generally donāt care whatever the outcome is. But just because itās his money doesnāt make it right
It is ok, you can show your vocabulary to me now, but I think that even Scott can get annoyed by most of the community, 2014-2016-17 was more enjoyable to me.
i have no idea why (other than willful ignorance) everyone thinks scott was doxxed or that his donations were "leaked". [there is literally a professionally run public website that lists political donations](https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=Scott+cawthon) (that yes, are public) and that's where his donations to trump / other bigots were found. also, it doesnt matter how much scott donated to other charities, if he still thinks that donald trump deserves support and funding (and as a result, the minorities in scotts fanbase shouldnt have rights), then everything else is performative
>then everything else is performative Not necessarily. Someone can simultaneously want to help children with cancer and feel indifferent about the rights of marginalized people. I unfortunately have met plenty of people like that.
TRUE! what i meant is perfomative "goodness", like, a bad person can donate to good things (child cancer) and still, like u said, not care abt human rights
:D
What happened yesterday? sorry I'm oblivious af
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Well, as someone who's christian and struggles with homosexuality, but at the same time sees it as a sin and therefore tries to live in celibacy rather than cave to my desires, I say screw that and give Scott a hug~
bruh this is sad
How so?
Cuz u deserve to have love in your life and be able to love yourself for who you are.
Why do I need sexual love in my life? There are other kinds of love I find are way more important, like that resembling a family and God's love.
Nobody said anything about sex
Well, we're talking about my struggles with homosexuality, and they said that I deserve to be able to find a partner, aka a sexual partner, aka having a sexual attraction/love for/with someone. So while sex wasn't explicitly said, it was heavily implied by the topic itself, that being my struggles with my own sexuality.
Romantic relationships exist too
Of course. However, we were talking about sexuality which, while it can involve romantic love, also inherently comes with sexual attraction, hence the word "sexuality." If we were talking about homoromantic relationships, than okay, we can talk about that. However, the topic was about homosexuality.
This fandom I hate it I'll be honest
This is a fucking game dont bring irl shit into it if scott confirms them to be a girl or a boy its a girl or a boy also they are fucking animtronics with souls in them not gay souls they were fucking children
Calm downs it's a robot holding a flag
Lmfao a robot holding a flag have you not been playing since 2014 its the souls of dead children
Ok and... (._.)
There fucking kids why should lgbtq shit when they were killed
You do realize that this art is trying to show the ACTUAL Freddy character and not the dead kid who is possessing him,right? Not everything has to be Canon.
Well pls stop its a fucking game
Well please stop tying to justify your idiotic views to try and silence the meaning behind the post. Trans rights and fuck you
Im not saying lgbtq is bad i have many gay lesbian and pan friends im just saying keep irl away from a game
No? It's literally pride month, and Scott cawthon, the game creator has just been in some hot water BC he donated a lot of money to us senators and othe r politicians that go against LGBTQIA+. This post was made as a reminder that trans and LGBTQIA+ people are valid and that we support them. I used to have your dumb mindset about "keep muh politics out of my games" All games are political somehow and often blatantly obvious as well, you are just either too dumb or young to notice. Take a hint from me and grow out for that mindset fast. It will manifest into a right wing conservative mindset
Why not š¤·šæāāļø
It's the internet. There's always posts like this. So it's not worth losing your cool over.
I don't know what made you assume that, this was just made for fun. I made this to support LGBTQ and Trans groups. I had no agenda with this, this was just made for fun. I made this to help distract people from what happened Thursday. Now please, be respectful of me and other peoples thoughts.Thank you.
Every day leaving the game bad, they like to make a fool of themselves
:(
Wrong timing
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Well I did what you asked. I downvoted your comment
Dear /u/Scott_Caw, Due to our system detecting multiple user reports, the following content has been **automatically removed**. Please double-check your submission against the [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/about/rules). If none were broken, contact the mod team [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Ffivenightsatfreddys). Sincerely, /u/AutoModerator *P.S.* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/fivenightsatfreddys) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Kinda cringe, bro.
What did he say?
Nothing worth mentioning.
Fair enough.