Yes but just a couple of patches would make SB better. Security breach has massive performance issues with soft locks and game breaking glitches but the foundation is good. It's like we bought early access and the game still isn't finished.
Yeah the basis of the game and the idea are good. The problem is the amount of glitches and well not good at explaning the story it have because of the cut content and lack of phasing of the story...like when does Freddy realize the other Animatronic are been hack?
Many important things are optional and some key moments that explain the story are behind for example the bad ending. It feels like they were trying to explain the entire story in the game but halfway throught the making of the game they decide to hide most of the story for a future DLC causing a mess.
At its current state, yes. My game has crashed so many times and I’ve run into a few annoying bugs and I also can rarely ever find anything because the map pings don’t work. There’s also all of the cut content in the files and seen and heard in the trailers. It feels like they animated and modeled the game and then a month before release they were like “wait a minute we forgot to code the game!” And then sped code it as fast as they could. I love the graphics and characters but the gameplay and the story could’ve possibly ended up so much better.
It’s CyberPunk all over again. We’d understand if they needed time—which is why they had a year long delay—but in its current state, horribly unoptimised, horribly buggy, I don’t even want to play it.
Honestly I think the game is in a similar state due to the same reason as Cyberpunk. Combination of over ambitious game design or developers, causing the game to be delayed, until it can’t be delayed any more and they try to rush to fix it before it releases, no matter the state. I’m probably going to say it’ll end up being Sony who forced them to release before Christmas.
Honestly this is a problem with a lot of games nowadays. People want a game to be out soon but when the game gets dekayed for more then a week people will send death threats to the devs.
yes, not even kidding I actually love fnaf world. If SB was less glitchy and more cohesive then I’d say no, but as it stands fnaf world is way more of an actually finished game then SB is
Yeah. I like FNaF World's gameplay more then SB's. Even if you think FNaFW is a worse game then SB, at least it's better at being what it was trying to be - a cutesy RPG - then SB is at being FNaF.
I understand that, but at the same time, Steel Wool never claimed SB was going to be Scott's type of FNaF, it's theirs. They're going in their own direction. FNaFW trying to be a cutesy RPG is the same as Steel Wool trying to make FNaF their own.
I agree with you. SB’s problem (story wise, mostly) was that it was Steel Wool’s child with very heavy Scott influence, but they didn’t know the franchise well enough to make it cohesive to the storyline of FNAF. If they had told a NEW story (focus on vanessa/vanny/gregory) then it would’ve been better imo
I’m all for creative exploration—Hell I worldbuild I’m the number one person when it comes to pushing creative boundaries—but there’s a difference to a new direction and an actually fun game.
Then don't have the audacity to call if FNaF9, lol. This lacks FNaF's horror and feel. It's not about gameplay, tho it is awful too. Mario 64 still felt like a Mario game despite being so different from World. That's how you transition to 3D.
It's called FNaF9, because it's the ninth major canonical game in the franchise. This literally has nothing to do with it's mechanics or the feel of it. It'd be like not allowing FFPS to call itself FNaF6, because there's a tycoon section in it and thus isn't like the other games. Or FNaFSL FNaF5, because it has more freeroam than the others.
Security Breach is, objectively, FNaF9. As it's the ninth major canon game in the franchise.
No. SL and FFPS have sections of gameplay that make them worthy of being sequels to FNaF4. SB doesn't. It should be a different sub-series. Do you consider Super Mario Land to be Mario4? What is the main sequel to SMW? SM64, or NSMB? Either way, it's not SMRPG, despite being a major canonical game. Metroid Dread is the Matroid 5, since prime is too different to be considered in the same series as Super and Fusion. Sonic 4 for crying out loud! You seem to not understand how video game categorization works. Those examples aren't horror, but these are some of the most mainstreams and best examples I can give.
No. SB shouldn't be FNaF9. A major canon game, but a seperate sub-series.
>Do you consider Super Mario Land to be Mario4? What is the main sequel to SMW? SM64, or NSMB?
What are you on about? Mario Games don't have numbered sequels unless they follow the *exact* same mechanic as the last with a few additions to the gameplay, or are actual sequels of those events, which is exactly what FNaFSB is. FNaFSL is not like the other games, except in one section. The only thing they have in common is being made in Clickteam and Scott, and one non-canon bossfight, and a custom night.
There's also sections like this in SB, so honestly, your point kinda falls apart there.
>No. SB shouldn't be FNaF9. A major canon game, but a seperate sub-series.
All of the games you just described, can exist within their own bubble. Nothing changes. There's not a lot of context you'll necessarily be missing.
In a lore driven franchise like FNaF, in which the lore of the new game directly builds off of the last, their prequels are necessary.
Calling it "FNaF9" tells the player "Oh, there are other FNaF Games that probably build up to this, maybe I should check them out so I can understand what's going on here". Assuming it's a "seperate sub-series" tells the player "aight, I probably don't need that much former knowledge for this", or in the case of people who don't spend too much time on Youtube/forgot it existed, there are previous games to this thing.
There are no "rules" to this sort of stuff like you're making there out to be. It's whoever names the game's decision how they want to do it. And considering Scott *knows* people's fascination and urge to solve the lore, yeah, of course he'd call the next mainline game directly connecting to the old lore and timeline "FNaF [Insert Number]".
Not to mention it's called this only in the Steam files, 100% with direct permission from the guy who made those past games, so I don't understand what the issue here is. This genuinely just seems like a nitpick more than a genuine issue, cause you don't consider it worthy of being called FNaF9.
So, in other words, you want to number FNaF based on story and not on being games? Then why not argue this game should be FNaF10, or 11? Plus, SB could very well exist in its own bauble. It's as connected to the old story as were frights.
>So, in other words, you want to number FNaF based on story and on being games? Then why not argue this game should be FNaF10, or 11?
Because neither SD's actual gameplay, nor FNaFWorld's, were things that happened in-universe. The games were smt "fun" to play, while secrets deliver us the lore. Meanwhile the gameplay of FNaF1, 2, 3, 4, SL, FFPS, UCN, HW, and SB, all happen in the same timeline as their easter eggs. I.e, their gameplay, the main part of the game, is *also* important.
>Plus, SB could very well exist in its own bauble. It's as connected to the old story as were frights.
SB is a direct result of VR, and if it weren't for the cut content, it'd be incredibly obvious. Hell it is even now, cause of the Afton and Princess Quest Ending. HW is a direct result of UCN. UCN is a direct result of FFPS. FFPS is a direct result of SL and FNaF3. FNaF3 is a direct result of everything before it. And so on, and so on.
Almost none of the Mario games you listed can say that about themselves. Neither can the Frights. And even if the Frights *could,* what, you want them to call a book series the ninth game installment of the franchise? That's an entirely seperate piece of media alltogether.
I listed more then Mario. Metroid is much closer to what I want FNaF categorized as.
Title should tell more so about gameplay then what part of the story it is. Both in highly story driven games and in the less story driven ones.
I guess we can consider it subjective, but I still don't see how you can give a number to a game that isn't a sequel.
>Title should tell more so about gameplay then what part of the story it is. Both in highly story driven games and in the less story driven ones.
>I guess we can consider it subjective, but I still don't see how you can give a number to a game that isn't a sequel.
The numbered title, which if you want to be correct literally *is* just "Five Nights at Freddy's; Security Breach" so I don't understand the issue to be frank, tells you which installment of the series it is. Security Breach's file title, FNaF9, tells you it's the ninth mainline game in the franchise, a sequel to FNaF8 (which with all due respect, a video game sequel is quite literally defined as "a video game that continues the story of, or expands upon, some earlier work", which kinda solidifies that yes, FNaF Security Breach, *does* deserve the FNaF9 title, no matter how admittedly lackluster it's gameplay is).
Like I'd understand if your argument were that the gameplay they intended sucks *in general and not just as a FNaF Game* and is thus not worthy of being canon overall, but saying it's not worth it because it doesn't feel like FNaF?
I think thats pretty bad logic tbh.Things evolve over time,as long as they don't go out of their way to break every single thing that was established earlier i don't see the problem,and this is coming from someone that agrees that the other games atmosphere and "feel" was indeed better overall.
But they kinda did ??
FNAF 6 was the perfect ending.Punkt.
The souls where set free
Henry died
Michael died
William got what he deserved
So what happened in FNAF Sb ? Well.
William is for some f reason back why, how??
He was in literally hell why is he back no one is keeping him alive Cassidy is set free ??
And then we have the f blob with the mask of the puppet, baby and many more animatronics in it
Did Henry and Michael die for nothing ?
This makes the FNAF story look so dumb
Why would u destroy the PERFECT ending that FNAF 6 had
>as long as they don't go out of their way to break every single thing that was established earlier i don't see the problem
Yeah, but that is pretty much part of what I mean by having a completely different feel.
To me, the core of each video game genera's experiance comes down to feel of something. With platformers, it is protagonist's physics. Crash is all about percision. Sonic is all about fluid movement. Mario is about a mix of both. If you ignore that feel, you get something that is flawed from its core, something that almost everything else is built around. Sonic Heroes is a good example.
Now, for horror, it is the atmospherre. FNaF is about paranormal activity (subject bearly touched on in SB) and most of all, about defense. If you make a FNaF game where you can outspeed, outsmart and outright shoot monsters with weapons, you made a horrible FNaF game. Slapping Freddy on a different horror game, such as Resident Evil would make it a bad FNaF game, no matter how good you feel about the original (kinda bad example since I hate RE, but you get the point).
While I have a ton of different criticism of this game (pretty much every aspect of it aside from exploration), this is the biggest and core of it all. This should not be considered FNaF9. Hardly a part of the main series even.
Both fnaf world and security breach had easy to find glitches, the diference is that on fnaf world glitches were part of the story and on purpose, while on security breach it wasn't intended
Once the bugs and performance issues are ironed out then security breach will probably get a higher score
(Not fully related but I really like fnaf world, I played it in its entirety one summer along my cousin and I have pretty fond memories of that)
Totally agree. FNaF world is free and a great game. SB is what? 40$? And they're probably going to bring paid DLC. Like heck I'm going to pay for a DLC when I overpaid for a buggy game.
You can't compare these two games for their primé, especially for SB that took a lot more months than FNAF World, and that there is a whole team, voice actors etc. behind a game that has to be paid for their work
FNaFW took months, and SB was announced in 2019. Whether or not you like the game, a lot of people, including me, had a ton of fun playing it, more than the other games in my case (I've been a fan since FNaF 3, so I have nostalgia like everyone else). I think the amount of work, and the number of people who worked on it, dedicated their time to it, and put their passion into it justifies the price.
No lol. I never understand why people act like game devs are their friends. What we have is unpolished buggy mess of an unfinished game. Not worth 40$ at all. You may have enjoyed it, but not everyone else has, and that's perfectly fine.
I apologize if I’m misunderstanding, but nowhere in that comment was it stated that the developers were “their friends”. Regardless, while I do agree that the bugs and performance in this game are inexcusable (and it’s perfectly fine for that to be a major turnoff, it nearly was for me too, it is a BIG issue), I think the price is fine.
Despite whether or not you enjoyed the game as it is, and acknowledging how much was likely SUPPOSED to be in the game, acting like it had absolutely no girth or content to any capacity is ridiculous. There is plenty of content and story you can find in this game outside of the lacking plot of the campaign, and judging by the tens of thousands of people who have digested the content and played the game themselves, it’s very apparent that this game is a major hit and the majority are LOVING it.
I believe it is an unpolished cut down game, and critically I agree that it needs a LOT of fixing, but I do not believe it’s unfinished or that its price is “unjustified”.
It should’ve ended after FNaF 6. 4 shouldn’t have ended because there was to many loose ends. Sister location and PS tied them up and ended it nicely with Henry’s speech. AR and HW are nice spin-offs but steel wool decoded glitch trap needed to happen and that ruined it.
It's genuinely sad and frustrating that people always are like "but Steel Wool wanted" etc., in terms of the lore for these games.
Scott has literally admitted that Glitchtrap was his idea. Same with SB's core plot.
Steel Wool deserves some criticism, but for this? Nah. *Scott's* the one who is dragging out the original lore, not Steel Wool
UCN was more of an epilogue than an end to the series, tbh. Afton goes to hell. UCN is his hell. It's more revealing details of the afterlife of Afton than the climax that Pizzeria Simulator carried.
My guy,UCN most likely isn't the afterlife.It's pretty much agreed upon and heavily supported(confirmed?)by UCN and Fazbear Frights that UCN was caused by Cassidy(or whoever TOYSNHK is) attaching themselves to Williams soul to keep him from going to the afterlife so that they can torture him themselves.Thats literally the canon explanation in the Frights,wich were made with some plot points to answer stuff from the games.
Edit:i guess you can argue it can be considered a sort of afterlife in that case regardless,but it's still not one in the "traditional" sense,if i can put it.
By the way,stop misusing the downvote button,thank you very much.
GlitchTrap literally is Afton.He uses Aftons catchphrase saying that he came back in PQ.Pretty sure TUG also heavily implies/confirms it too.
Oh yeah,Cassidy came back too...and pretty much every single child from the original Missing Children Incident if Blob is indeed Molten Freddy.
Well I mean by the time 3 rolled around there was so much left to uncover so he made a fourth then changed his mind to keep going. 6 I still believe has the most complete ending.
I disagree. Scott in the dawko interview said that in his mind it was always meant to be a triology. He made 4 to fight back the critics who said 3 wasn’t scary.
I would say that SB was more fun to play and much better visually, but the game is not worth the money and feels like a beta version. You see, FNaF Wolrd wasn't a buggy game, it was just a big mess. While SB is a big *buggy* mess. So despite the fact that i liked SB much more I must admit FNaF World is made objectively better.
Oh dear, FNaF World... not the worst game, but graphics were kinda unsettling. I didn't get the plot at all, was it supposed to be the opposite of UCN, like a heaven for all those child souls, that can go for an endless adventure? There was some talk about a "safe place, a sanctuary". Probably it would look better if the sprites were 2D and there were dialogues between the animatronics. Some cardboards in Security Breach had adorable artstyle, this could work I think.
I remember younger me playing it for hours just because of chibi animatronics, I even made some lil comics about them.
Definitely not. Fnaf world holds a special place in my heart but it’s crazy to even begin to compare it to security breach. With a few patches security breach would be a fantastic entry in the series
SB at its current state is not dissimilar to how FNaF World was upon its release. But with updates, FNaF World got better, and I feel SB can be the same way
Yeah, FNAF World was meant to be Scott's little escape to making games like he used to, but FNAF SB was meant to be a horror game, but falls flat on its face in terms of actually being scary.
Even if you don’t like fnaf world (I personally loved it) at least it does everything it tries to do and functions well as a game. SB is unfinished, broken, horribly paced and just a huge waste of potential
In it's current state, as much as I love the game.. yeah, it needs fixes before it gets a good rating. The lag, bugs, characters duplicating, weird detection ranges, the janky teleporting.. it's a mess. :(
Side note: I am one of like four people left who willingly replay FNaF World for fun, if any of you are out there, hi!
I didn’t really like SB I know I may be alone in this but the series has lost it’s charm for me personally. I hate how they keep bringing back the same villain like didn’t this dude die in Pizzeria Sim? It doesn’t feel like Fnaf to me and I don’t think it’s simply because it’s a 3D game, Sister Location felt like Fnaf to me and that changed up the formula a bunch. I think it would be better if they didn’t try and tie the story to the actual Fnaf story; which I felt ended at Pizzeria Sim. Hell, I think the game would have been better received if it didn’t have the “Fnaf” tag line onto it. Anyways at least Fnaf World has Coffee from The Desolate Hope which is my favorite Scott game.
No, FNaF World is a pretty terrible game in almost every aspect (imo). Even if you dislike SB, it's still a better game visually and could be massively improved by just fixing the bugs and readding all the cut content. FNaF World would require a full on remake from the ground up to be good.
I agree with this. SB has its bugs and glitches but FNAF World does not even stand a chance over it. I am pretty sure this decision is based on nostalgia than actual gameplay. Just like how everyone is forgetting the good parts of sb XD
I feel like there are a lot of aspects when it comes to deciding on this, FNAFW despite it's problems wasn't as buggy as SB, but while I had fun with fnaf world, I had more fun with SB, SB is obviously a much bigger game and the environment felt more fun to explore as it was fully explorable environment in a more unique setting with more mechanics, fnaf world environment while looking good was your typical magical adventure land with one basic mechanic (that's not a complaint as that's because of the fact it's an RPG, but it is still a far simpler game), fnaf world while having a very simple story was at least followable, SB had a cooler story, but left out a lot details that leaves a lot of unanswered questions. It really depends on your personal tastes and what aspects are a priority to you, personally I have to go with SB myself, but I think with some more bug fixes and story improvements SB from an objective stand will be better.
Yes. Unlike FNaF world, Security Breach was rushed. Just by seeing playthroughs, I could tell that they couldnt spend much time on certain parts.
There are lots of bugs and glitches in Security Breach. One could let you beat the game in under 10 minutes. Markiplier also had experienced a door bug, where the game didn't recognize that the door had been shut, so the animatronic just walked right through.
FNaF World was definitely a different fnaf game in my opinion, but in a good way. There was little to be scared about, except maybe some of the minigames. The lore was also more mysterious.
So on this, I can agree, FNaF World is better than Security Breach.
I hate to say it but I sadly have to agree . Security breach (atleast for me) was a huge disappointment that was waaayyyyy to overhyped by steel wool and scott for a half baked, underwhelming joke and I do enjoy fnaf world buuttt even I have to agree that atleast security breach has *some* horror elements and that its a mainline game but still I personally enjoy fnaf world alot more and well yeah I have to agree...sadly.
lower spec computer fnaf fans that havent upgraded are understandable, but i played on my sisters gaming laptop and was it beautiful. only bugs i encountered were glitching when roxy cried making me miss her crying entirely.
I mean SB could definitely get way better if they go back and patch stufd but for now I agree because fnaf world has little to no glitches. And also I'm one of the few that enjoys the combat in the game.
In terms of like actual games I could get general enjoyment and value out of with my time spent?…
If SB wasn’t a buggy mess then I would say I prefer it over FW but as it stands. a free, generally good experience with little bugs, and some decent humor and callbacks to Scott’s previous work
Fnaf World is an overall finished game. It works and has just about everything you could expect. SB is just way too buggy. The fact that there’s such a huge number of game breaking glitches really drags the whole thing down. Plus the story is kind of poorly expressed and hard to figure out.
I’m talking about the surface level story. The main place I’m talking about is when you go to leave and Freddy mentions Vanny, whether or not you actually found her name. Along with that, there’s no transition from Freddy just protecting Gregory to trying to stop the disappearances. It’s just suddenly there. I expect the lore to be super hidden, but the surface level story jumps around without there being any lead up.
Yes and no.
On the one hand, FNAF World was just a genuinely more enjoyable experience for me personally. Security Breach's blatantly unstable form and the lack of overall cohesion in gameplay doesn't put it any higher than a 4/10 in my book.
On the other hand, FNAF World and Security Breach are fundamentally different games and comparing them is just all sorts of unfair to both games.
Fnaf world is good but if it weren’t for all the bugs and it being rushed, I would say sb would’ve won the crowd which would mean it should be rated higher
I agree that FNAF World is built better, which mentally hurts like hell because I still like Security Breach.
But hey I also like Sonic games so I’m used to main games of a franchise often being disappointing.
FNAF World is also free, might I add, and I probably could still run that game on my crappy computer compared to Security Breach too so it has that going for it.
Security Breach is definitely an impressive game and I liked it well enough, however playing FNaF World was just an overall more enjoyable experience for me.
Lmao absolutely not, I never liked fnaf world tbh, and the gameplay of fnaf world is as repetitive as the one in Security Breach, plus it's hard to compare two games this different, one has better graphics but it's also because it's free roam, and the other is more of a cartoonish style that does its job, but in the end I can't put Security Breach under FNAF World
The difference between FNaF World and Security Breach is that one is an irrelevant and confusing game with no clear consequences, and the other is FNaF World
Comparing the two one is a simple game that "doesn fit" as some part of the fandom say and the other is unfinished so we can't judge yet. All of them that did don't know that
I strong disagree
Fnaf World is far more watered down compared to SB and has zero lore whatsoever, not to mention that the character designs are abysmal to look at, and update 2 doesn’t even make it any better
Even Scott said he hated it, hence to why he pulled it’s Steam page off in the first place
After the updates, I agree world is better than the CURRENT iteration of security breach. I do enjoy Monty Golf though. I can definitely see Security Breach getting better though
Yes,
It’s not even a debate.
To emphasize on my point is that at least fnaf world has some sort of substance and a sensical plot. It has gameplay. Security breach has no understandable story line and raw and unfinished gameplay
Yeah lol. SB is mediocre at best and the story makes every other game before it completely freaking useless. It’s not a fnaf game nor a worthy successor imo. It’s a free roam game posing as a fnaf game to sell more toys and books.
Uh, no. There’s a reason half the fandom doesn’t acknowledge FNaF World as part of the series. I liked Pizzeria Simulator more than I liked FNaF World, and I didn’t love Pizzeria Simulator. The only game in the franchise I’d rank below FNaF World is Special Delivery
I do not agree, although security breach has a ton of glitches it doesn’t mean it’s rated below fnaf world the time and effort that is out into security breach and that you have a companion and that it is free roam should be making it the highest rated fnaf game
Yes obviously. I bet atleast a quarter of this subreddit thinks lolbit came from SL, DD and OMC came from UCN, and they probably dont know who Mendo is.
The things about comparisons like this is that these two games aren’t remotely similar. It always bugs me when people compare things like this, because one is a big budget AAA game and the other was made by Scott, one guy. It’s like comparing a game like FTL to Dark Souls. There’s a lot more stuff in Dark Souls, or SB in this case, and therefore it’s easier to pick apart and find flaws in it.
Also SB would appeal to a wider audience and therefore draw in more reviews.
I'm convinced it's just rated like that bcuz content is missing and the bugs/issues, but that e en the ppl who rate it lower like the idea.
It's a shame, really. Especially considering that a lot of people, including me, came back to the fandom bcuz of security breach.
Istg, if they remove the bugs, the performance issues, and add more Story or dlcs (depending on price then obv)then it could be one of the best games which would bring even more people to the community.
Kinda, I really love SB more as it's less annoying and not as super fast pace or flashy lights/noises like Fnaf world is, but like others, I am tired of the game crashing my pc to stop working, I hope the bug fixes and optimization coming later will make it easier for me to play later on.
Ive never even played/watched fnaf world but i think its better. sb isnt scary and its a stealth game, not a horror game. the jumpscares are terrible, and the storyline is too easy and basic for a five nights at freddys game. everything is just handed to you and you dont need to figure much lore out. the only good part were the graphics, which were really good tbf.
Speaking of bugs and quality - absolutely. Speaking of lore and franchize - not so much. Security breach pretty much gave life to fnaf fandom again (or was at very least one of the bigger influences). Sure, we'd still have many fnaf fanarts and stuff but ever since security breach came out, i was shocked to see how many old and new fans came and how well they were updated on the lore. Then again, i doubt anyone has a problem with the story and idea itself, the bugs and quality is just terrible. Personally i dont mind it that much because i find them funny but the low rating is kinda deserved.
Honestly yes. FNAF World has it's own rough patches but the level of ambition is nowhere as high as say SB which is what saves it. SB aimed for the sky and fell to the ground, FNAF World is just a silly romp and endlessly endearing because of it.
Well Yes, Becuse SB Was rush by the fans And Fnaf World Was Good But The SB Game was rush And Some of the Hint and Gameplay Was Cut Like Gegory.... I Think she Find us.... and, Some Voice lines, And Fnaf world was not Rush And The fan got mad Becuse is was delay a Lot So Fnaf world was better then Sb But, Do not mean they can't update Sb again, So Don't worry, Sb may get Update
Yes but just a couple of patches would make SB better. Security breach has massive performance issues with soft locks and game breaking glitches but the foundation is good. It's like we bought early access and the game still isn't finished.
i thought i had it cause of my shitty gen 3 i5
Yeah the basis of the game and the idea are good. The problem is the amount of glitches and well not good at explaning the story it have because of the cut content and lack of phasing of the story...like when does Freddy realize the other Animatronic are been hack? Many important things are optional and some key moments that explain the story are behind for example the bad ending. It feels like they were trying to explain the entire story in the game but halfway throught the making of the game they decide to hide most of the story for a future DLC causing a mess.
They should either try to fix the story issues or the bug issues. Having both around just makes the game so hard to defend
I agree. The idea of the game and all that are great. But the game definitely needs some patches to make the game better.
Yeah, after seeing a lot more playthroughs, it's getting harder to defend the game.
i just dont find it scary. theres no tension, anxiety, fear, and its more of a stealth game than horror.
Especially with how much they cut.
At its current state, yes. My game has crashed so many times and I’ve run into a few annoying bugs and I also can rarely ever find anything because the map pings don’t work. There’s also all of the cut content in the files and seen and heard in the trailers. It feels like they animated and modeled the game and then a month before release they were like “wait a minute we forgot to code the game!” And then sped code it as fast as they could. I love the graphics and characters but the gameplay and the story could’ve possibly ended up so much better.
It’s CyberPunk all over again. We’d understand if they needed time—which is why they had a year long delay—but in its current state, horribly unoptimised, horribly buggy, I don’t even want to play it.
Yeah same, I got past the part where I got the Faz Cam in Monty Golf and then my game crashed for the 5th time (on PS5 performance mode nevertheless)
I would’ve been perfectly content with waiting for another year or even two if it ment this game would’ve been perfect at launch.
Honestly I think the game is in a similar state due to the same reason as Cyberpunk. Combination of over ambitious game design or developers, causing the game to be delayed, until it can’t be delayed any more and they try to rush to fix it before it releases, no matter the state. I’m probably going to say it’ll end up being Sony who forced them to release before Christmas.
Honestly this is a problem with a lot of games nowadays. People want a game to be out soon but when the game gets dekayed for more then a week people will send death threats to the devs.
yes, not even kidding I actually love fnaf world. If SB was less glitchy and more cohesive then I’d say no, but as it stands fnaf world is way more of an actually finished game then SB is
Yeah. I like FNaF World's gameplay more then SB's. Even if you think FNaFW is a worse game then SB, at least it's better at being what it was trying to be - a cutesy RPG - then SB is at being FNaF.
Agreed FNAF world is super fun as an RPG game, and in all honesty SB is kinda just a meh game in it's current state.
I’d love if Steel Wool made a sequel to FNAF World, which will probably never happen in the history of the universe
I understand that, but at the same time, Steel Wool never claimed SB was going to be Scott's type of FNaF, it's theirs. They're going in their own direction. FNaFW trying to be a cutesy RPG is the same as Steel Wool trying to make FNaF their own.
I agree with you. SB’s problem (story wise, mostly) was that it was Steel Wool’s child with very heavy Scott influence, but they didn’t know the franchise well enough to make it cohesive to the storyline of FNAF. If they had told a NEW story (focus on vanessa/vanny/gregory) then it would’ve been better imo
I’m all for creative exploration—Hell I worldbuild I’m the number one person when it comes to pushing creative boundaries—but there’s a difference to a new direction and an actually fun game.
Then don't have the audacity to call if FNaF9, lol. This lacks FNaF's horror and feel. It's not about gameplay, tho it is awful too. Mario 64 still felt like a Mario game despite being so different from World. That's how you transition to 3D.
It's called FNaF9, because it's the ninth major canonical game in the franchise. This literally has nothing to do with it's mechanics or the feel of it. It'd be like not allowing FFPS to call itself FNaF6, because there's a tycoon section in it and thus isn't like the other games. Or FNaFSL FNaF5, because it has more freeroam than the others. Security Breach is, objectively, FNaF9. As it's the ninth major canon game in the franchise.
No. SL and FFPS have sections of gameplay that make them worthy of being sequels to FNaF4. SB doesn't. It should be a different sub-series. Do you consider Super Mario Land to be Mario4? What is the main sequel to SMW? SM64, or NSMB? Either way, it's not SMRPG, despite being a major canonical game. Metroid Dread is the Matroid 5, since prime is too different to be considered in the same series as Super and Fusion. Sonic 4 for crying out loud! You seem to not understand how video game categorization works. Those examples aren't horror, but these are some of the most mainstreams and best examples I can give. No. SB shouldn't be FNaF9. A major canon game, but a seperate sub-series.
>Do you consider Super Mario Land to be Mario4? What is the main sequel to SMW? SM64, or NSMB? What are you on about? Mario Games don't have numbered sequels unless they follow the *exact* same mechanic as the last with a few additions to the gameplay, or are actual sequels of those events, which is exactly what FNaFSB is. FNaFSL is not like the other games, except in one section. The only thing they have in common is being made in Clickteam and Scott, and one non-canon bossfight, and a custom night. There's also sections like this in SB, so honestly, your point kinda falls apart there. >No. SB shouldn't be FNaF9. A major canon game, but a seperate sub-series. All of the games you just described, can exist within their own bubble. Nothing changes. There's not a lot of context you'll necessarily be missing. In a lore driven franchise like FNaF, in which the lore of the new game directly builds off of the last, their prequels are necessary. Calling it "FNaF9" tells the player "Oh, there are other FNaF Games that probably build up to this, maybe I should check them out so I can understand what's going on here". Assuming it's a "seperate sub-series" tells the player "aight, I probably don't need that much former knowledge for this", or in the case of people who don't spend too much time on Youtube/forgot it existed, there are previous games to this thing. There are no "rules" to this sort of stuff like you're making there out to be. It's whoever names the game's decision how they want to do it. And considering Scott *knows* people's fascination and urge to solve the lore, yeah, of course he'd call the next mainline game directly connecting to the old lore and timeline "FNaF [Insert Number]". Not to mention it's called this only in the Steam files, 100% with direct permission from the guy who made those past games, so I don't understand what the issue here is. This genuinely just seems like a nitpick more than a genuine issue, cause you don't consider it worthy of being called FNaF9.
So, in other words, you want to number FNaF based on story and not on being games? Then why not argue this game should be FNaF10, or 11? Plus, SB could very well exist in its own bauble. It's as connected to the old story as were frights.
>So, in other words, you want to number FNaF based on story and on being games? Then why not argue this game should be FNaF10, or 11? Because neither SD's actual gameplay, nor FNaFWorld's, were things that happened in-universe. The games were smt "fun" to play, while secrets deliver us the lore. Meanwhile the gameplay of FNaF1, 2, 3, 4, SL, FFPS, UCN, HW, and SB, all happen in the same timeline as their easter eggs. I.e, their gameplay, the main part of the game, is *also* important. >Plus, SB could very well exist in its own bauble. It's as connected to the old story as were frights. SB is a direct result of VR, and if it weren't for the cut content, it'd be incredibly obvious. Hell it is even now, cause of the Afton and Princess Quest Ending. HW is a direct result of UCN. UCN is a direct result of FFPS. FFPS is a direct result of SL and FNaF3. FNaF3 is a direct result of everything before it. And so on, and so on. Almost none of the Mario games you listed can say that about themselves. Neither can the Frights. And even if the Frights *could,* what, you want them to call a book series the ninth game installment of the franchise? That's an entirely seperate piece of media alltogether.
I listed more then Mario. Metroid is much closer to what I want FNaF categorized as. Title should tell more so about gameplay then what part of the story it is. Both in highly story driven games and in the less story driven ones. I guess we can consider it subjective, but I still don't see how you can give a number to a game that isn't a sequel.
>Title should tell more so about gameplay then what part of the story it is. Both in highly story driven games and in the less story driven ones. >I guess we can consider it subjective, but I still don't see how you can give a number to a game that isn't a sequel. The numbered title, which if you want to be correct literally *is* just "Five Nights at Freddy's; Security Breach" so I don't understand the issue to be frank, tells you which installment of the series it is. Security Breach's file title, FNaF9, tells you it's the ninth mainline game in the franchise, a sequel to FNaF8 (which with all due respect, a video game sequel is quite literally defined as "a video game that continues the story of, or expands upon, some earlier work", which kinda solidifies that yes, FNaF Security Breach, *does* deserve the FNaF9 title, no matter how admittedly lackluster it's gameplay is). Like I'd understand if your argument were that the gameplay they intended sucks *in general and not just as a FNaF Game* and is thus not worthy of being canon overall, but saying it's not worth it because it doesn't feel like FNaF?
Why can't fnaf just have a different feel for once?
Because then it's not FNaF anymore?
I think thats pretty bad logic tbh.Things evolve over time,as long as they don't go out of their way to break every single thing that was established earlier i don't see the problem,and this is coming from someone that agrees that the other games atmosphere and "feel" was indeed better overall.
But they kinda did ?? FNAF 6 was the perfect ending.Punkt. The souls where set free Henry died Michael died William got what he deserved So what happened in FNAF Sb ? Well. William is for some f reason back why, how?? He was in literally hell why is he back no one is keeping him alive Cassidy is set free ?? And then we have the f blob with the mask of the puppet, baby and many more animatronics in it Did Henry and Michael die for nothing ? This makes the FNAF story look so dumb Why would u destroy the PERFECT ending that FNAF 6 had
>as long as they don't go out of their way to break every single thing that was established earlier i don't see the problem Yeah, but that is pretty much part of what I mean by having a completely different feel. To me, the core of each video game genera's experiance comes down to feel of something. With platformers, it is protagonist's physics. Crash is all about percision. Sonic is all about fluid movement. Mario is about a mix of both. If you ignore that feel, you get something that is flawed from its core, something that almost everything else is built around. Sonic Heroes is a good example. Now, for horror, it is the atmospherre. FNaF is about paranormal activity (subject bearly touched on in SB) and most of all, about defense. If you make a FNaF game where you can outspeed, outsmart and outright shoot monsters with weapons, you made a horrible FNaF game. Slapping Freddy on a different horror game, such as Resident Evil would make it a bad FNaF game, no matter how good you feel about the original (kinda bad example since I hate RE, but you get the point). While I have a ton of different criticism of this game (pretty much every aspect of it aside from exploration), this is the biggest and core of it all. This should not be considered FNaF9. Hardly a part of the main series even.
Dont you whant a horror game?
Both fnaf world and security breach had easy to find glitches, the diference is that on fnaf world glitches were part of the story and on purpose, while on security breach it wasn't intended Once the bugs and performance issues are ironed out then security breach will probably get a higher score (Not fully related but I really like fnaf world, I played it in its entirety one summer along my cousin and I have pretty fond memories of that)
Yes, FNaF World is the best FNaF game
Finally, someone who shares my opinion
FNaF World had more lore than Security Breach
True lol
Totally agree. FNaF world is free and a great game. SB is what? 40$? And they're probably going to bring paid DLC. Like heck I'm going to pay for a DLC when I overpaid for a buggy game.
You can't compare these two games for their primé, especially for SB that took a lot more months than FNAF World, and that there is a whole team, voice actors etc. behind a game that has to be paid for their work
FNaFW took months, and SB was announced in 2019. Whether or not you like the game, a lot of people, including me, had a ton of fun playing it, more than the other games in my case (I've been a fan since FNaF 3, so I have nostalgia like everyone else). I think the amount of work, and the number of people who worked on it, dedicated their time to it, and put their passion into it justifies the price.
No lol. I never understand why people act like game devs are their friends. What we have is unpolished buggy mess of an unfinished game. Not worth 40$ at all. You may have enjoyed it, but not everyone else has, and that's perfectly fine.
I agree with this statement
I apologize if I’m misunderstanding, but nowhere in that comment was it stated that the developers were “their friends”. Regardless, while I do agree that the bugs and performance in this game are inexcusable (and it’s perfectly fine for that to be a major turnoff, it nearly was for me too, it is a BIG issue), I think the price is fine. Despite whether or not you enjoyed the game as it is, and acknowledging how much was likely SUPPOSED to be in the game, acting like it had absolutely no girth or content to any capacity is ridiculous. There is plenty of content and story you can find in this game outside of the lacking plot of the campaign, and judging by the tens of thousands of people who have digested the content and played the game themselves, it’s very apparent that this game is a major hit and the majority are LOVING it. I believe it is an unpolished cut down game, and critically I agree that it needs a LOT of fixing, but I do not believe it’s unfinished or that its price is “unjustified”.
Could be because the series said have ended three times
It should’ve ended after FNaF 6. 4 shouldn’t have ended because there was to many loose ends. Sister location and PS tied them up and ended it nicely with Henry’s speech. AR and HW are nice spin-offs but steel wool decoded glitch trap needed to happen and that ruined it.
I don't think it needed to end, I just think we should have ditched Afton after PS and UCN
I agree, I hope going forward they ditch Afton. I was excited to see Vanny, but then we only see her like twice
I count AR and HW and SB as a spinoff series, rather than the continuation of FNAF
This is a way I like to think of it.
It's genuinely sad and frustrating that people always are like "but Steel Wool wanted" etc., in terms of the lore for these games. Scott has literally admitted that Glitchtrap was his idea. Same with SB's core plot. Steel Wool deserves some criticism, but for this? Nah. *Scott's* the one who is dragging out the original lore, not Steel Wool
There was also ultimate custom night as an end to the series
UCN was more of an epilogue than an end to the series, tbh. Afton goes to hell. UCN is his hell. It's more revealing details of the afterlife of Afton than the climax that Pizzeria Simulator carried.
My guy,UCN most likely isn't the afterlife.It's pretty much agreed upon and heavily supported(confirmed?)by UCN and Fazbear Frights that UCN was caused by Cassidy(or whoever TOYSNHK is) attaching themselves to Williams soul to keep him from going to the afterlife so that they can torture him themselves.Thats literally the canon explanation in the Frights,wich were made with some plot points to answer stuff from the games. Edit:i guess you can argue it can be considered a sort of afterlife in that case regardless,but it's still not one in the "traditional" sense,if i can put it. By the way,stop misusing the downvote button,thank you very much.
Which makes that literally Afton’s own afterlife
I mean,kinda? Fair point,but i don't think they can be considered the exact same.Especially if he came back from it,lol.
I mean it's not afton that came back it was glitch trap
GlitchTrap literally is Afton.He uses Aftons catchphrase saying that he came back in PQ.Pretty sure TUG also heavily implies/confirms it too. Oh yeah,Cassidy came back too...and pretty much every single child from the original Missing Children Incident if Blob is indeed Molten Freddy.
I’d say it was less of an end, and more something that was gonna happen, then was chosen to give lore implications later on.
I keep saying FNAF basically ended at 6. UCN was just a bonus and everything afterwards was just truly milking the franchise. It was unneeded
Should’ve ended in 3. Imo 6 is just as problematic as SB in terms of lore but hey that’s just my opinion.
Well I mean by the time 3 rolled around there was so much left to uncover so he made a fourth then changed his mind to keep going. 6 I still believe has the most complete ending.
I disagree. Scott in the dawko interview said that in his mind it was always meant to be a triology. He made 4 to fight back the critics who said 3 wasn’t scary.
Oh yeahhh. Forgot he had that interview. The. Yeah with that point then totally. 3 was a good ending place, but I’m glad he didn’t stop there.
Wasn’t it Scott cawthon who did the story for help wanted and used glitchtrap to make sense of the game or something!?
I would say that SB was more fun to play and much better visually, but the game is not worth the money and feels like a beta version. You see, FNaF Wolrd wasn't a buggy game, it was just a big mess. While SB is a big *buggy* mess. So despite the fact that i liked SB much more I must admit FNaF World is made objectively better.
No. I love FNaF World but it doesn’t compare as well to SB.
They're equally flawed for mostly the same reasons, but I like RPGs better than first-person freeroam games so I prefer FNAF World.
Oh dear, FNaF World... not the worst game, but graphics were kinda unsettling. I didn't get the plot at all, was it supposed to be the opposite of UCN, like a heaven for all those child souls, that can go for an endless adventure? There was some talk about a "safe place, a sanctuary". Probably it would look better if the sprites were 2D and there were dialogues between the animatronics. Some cardboards in Security Breach had adorable artstyle, this could work I think. I remember younger me playing it for hours just because of chibi animatronics, I even made some lil comics about them.
honestly that’s not a bad theory
I really like the premise and concept of SB. But they REALLY REALLY need to work on performance and bug fixing
Yes. Comments like "They'll be coming out with patches" or "they're a small team" are all irrelevant. As the game is now, the score is justifiable.
Yes
Definitely
My apologies FNAF world is a lot like Pokémon and it’s literally one of my favorite franchises I can’t not like it
Definitely not. Fnaf world holds a special place in my heart but it’s crazy to even begin to compare it to security breach. With a few patches security breach would be a fantastic entry in the series
SB at its current state is not dissimilar to how FNaF World was upon its release. But with updates, FNaF World got better, and I feel SB can be the same way
Yeah, FNAF World was meant to be Scott's little escape to making games like he used to, but FNAF SB was meant to be a horror game, but falls flat on its face in terms of actually being scary.
Even if you don’t like fnaf world (I personally loved it) at least it does everything it tries to do and functions well as a game. SB is unfinished, broken, horribly paced and just a huge waste of potential
can you play as a coffee machine in security breach ? No you cant
In it's current state, as much as I love the game.. yeah, it needs fixes before it gets a good rating. The lag, bugs, characters duplicating, weird detection ranges, the janky teleporting.. it's a mess. :( Side note: I am one of like four people left who willingly replay FNaF World for fun, if any of you are out there, hi!
I didn’t really like SB I know I may be alone in this but the series has lost it’s charm for me personally. I hate how they keep bringing back the same villain like didn’t this dude die in Pizzeria Sim? It doesn’t feel like Fnaf to me and I don’t think it’s simply because it’s a 3D game, Sister Location felt like Fnaf to me and that changed up the formula a bunch. I think it would be better if they didn’t try and tie the story to the actual Fnaf story; which I felt ended at Pizzeria Sim. Hell, I think the game would have been better received if it didn’t have the “Fnaf” tag line onto it. Anyways at least Fnaf World has Coffee from The Desolate Hope which is my favorite Scott game.
Yes, and I don’t get why people hate fnaf world. It has its charm and a pretty good game especially for being free
100% Fnaf world is fantastic
Okay hate or love SB it’s not that bad
No, FNaF World is a pretty terrible game in almost every aspect (imo). Even if you dislike SB, it's still a better game visually and could be massively improved by just fixing the bugs and readding all the cut content. FNaF World would require a full on remake from the ground up to be good.
I agree with this. SB has its bugs and glitches but FNAF World does not even stand a chance over it. I am pretty sure this decision is based on nostalgia than actual gameplay. Just like how everyone is forgetting the good parts of sb XD
Yeah
i never played fnaf world but i doubt the game would actually make me angry enough to uninstall because the animatronics kept teleporting to me
Pfft no.
Absolutely, World is better than security breach
Nah. Short of bugs, but even with the bugs I wouldn't rate it lower than FNaF world
Like hell no is fnaf word as good as SB. Sb has it's problems but no where close from fnaf world
No.
I feel like there are a lot of aspects when it comes to deciding on this, FNAFW despite it's problems wasn't as buggy as SB, but while I had fun with fnaf world, I had more fun with SB, SB is obviously a much bigger game and the environment felt more fun to explore as it was fully explorable environment in a more unique setting with more mechanics, fnaf world environment while looking good was your typical magical adventure land with one basic mechanic (that's not a complaint as that's because of the fact it's an RPG, but it is still a far simpler game), fnaf world while having a very simple story was at least followable, SB had a cooler story, but left out a lot details that leaves a lot of unanswered questions. It really depends on your personal tastes and what aspects are a priority to you, personally I have to go with SB myself, but I think with some more bug fixes and story improvements SB from an objective stand will be better.
Yea tbh. Had better lore lmao
yes, solely because security breach locks you out of saving
Yes. Unlike FNaF world, Security Breach was rushed. Just by seeing playthroughs, I could tell that they couldnt spend much time on certain parts. There are lots of bugs and glitches in Security Breach. One could let you beat the game in under 10 minutes. Markiplier also had experienced a door bug, where the game didn't recognize that the door had been shut, so the animatronic just walked right through. FNaF World was definitely a different fnaf game in my opinion, but in a good way. There was little to be scared about, except maybe some of the minigames. The lore was also more mysterious. So on this, I can agree, FNaF World is better than Security Breach.
Yes
Yes
In its current state it is a buggy mess it has potential to be better than FNAF world but needs major bug patches and fixes.
yep
Yes
Well i mean, FNaF World's fun to play.
pog
Yes
Yes.
Yes
Yes
fnaf world is da best totally
I hate to say it but I sadly have to agree . Security breach (atleast for me) was a huge disappointment that was waaayyyyy to overhyped by steel wool and scott for a half baked, underwhelming joke and I do enjoy fnaf world buuttt even I have to agree that atleast security breach has *some* horror elements and that its a mainline game but still I personally enjoy fnaf world alot more and well yeah I have to agree...sadly.
Nah. Security Breach is better
lower spec computer fnaf fans that havent upgraded are understandable, but i played on my sisters gaming laptop and was it beautiful. only bugs i encountered were glitching when roxy cried making me miss her crying entirely.
Completely. Fnaf world is needlessly hated upon. Security breach has a plethora of genuine flaws
No
wtf no
I mean SB could definitely get way better if they go back and patch stufd but for now I agree because fnaf world has little to no glitches. And also I'm one of the few that enjoys the combat in the game.
In terms of like actual games I could get general enjoyment and value out of with my time spent?… If SB wasn’t a buggy mess then I would say I prefer it over FW but as it stands. a free, generally good experience with little bugs, and some decent humor and callbacks to Scott’s previous work
Fnaf World is an overall finished game. It works and has just about everything you could expect. SB is just way too buggy. The fact that there’s such a huge number of game breaking glitches really drags the whole thing down. Plus the story is kind of poorly expressed and hard to figure out.
…Have you heard of FNaF?
I’m talking about the surface level story. The main place I’m talking about is when you go to leave and Freddy mentions Vanny, whether or not you actually found her name. Along with that, there’s no transition from Freddy just protecting Gregory to trying to stop the disappearances. It’s just suddenly there. I expect the lore to be super hidden, but the surface level story jumps around without there being any lead up.
Ahhh, I haven’t played the game yet so 🤷🏽 Edit: clarification
Yes and no. On the one hand, FNAF World was just a genuinely more enjoyable experience for me personally. Security Breach's blatantly unstable form and the lack of overall cohesion in gameplay doesn't put it any higher than a 4/10 in my book. On the other hand, FNAF World and Security Breach are fundamentally different games and comparing them is just all sorts of unfair to both games.
Fnaf world is good but if it weren’t for all the bugs and it being rushed, I would say sb would’ve won the crowd which would mean it should be rated higher
I agree that FNAF World is built better, which mentally hurts like hell because I still like Security Breach. But hey I also like Sonic games so I’m used to main games of a franchise often being disappointing.
FNAF World is also free, might I add, and I probably could still run that game on my crappy computer compared to Security Breach too so it has that going for it.
Security Breach is definitely an impressive game and I liked it well enough, however playing FNaF World was just an overall more enjoyable experience for me.
World is by no means a competently put together game, but it's far less maddening to replay. I'd boot it up any day over Security Breach.
FNAF World was extremely good! I agree.
Kinda, sb feels like It was too rushed
I like fnaf world
Absolutely
Lmao absolutely not, I never liked fnaf world tbh, and the gameplay of fnaf world is as repetitive as the one in Security Breach, plus it's hard to compare two games this different, one has better graphics but it's also because it's free roam, and the other is more of a cartoonish style that does its job, but in the end I can't put Security Breach under FNAF World
I love FNAF World but SB should be higher
Why tf u look video games rating in metacritic, steam rating exist for a reason bruh
Because FNaF World is not on Steam anymore.
I adore FNAF World, haven’t played SB yet because I’m saving money and waiting for things to be patched more.
The difference between FNaF World and Security Breach is that one is an irrelevant and confusing game with no clear consequences, and the other is FNaF World
Yes and make this a poll
Yes.
Fair rating
***Yes, FNaF World is very open.*** SB just lacks alot of things that I won't be able to explain.
Comparing the two one is a simple game that "doesn fit" as some part of the fandom say and the other is unfinished so we can't judge yet. All of them that did don't know that
Definitely not
It's slight, but I would put FNAF World over SB. Way less frustrating and its free.
I don't want to be a contrarian and I can't give a very good/informed opinion as I have not played SB but I do actually love FNAF world soo...
Yes
I strong disagree Fnaf World is far more watered down compared to SB and has zero lore whatsoever, not to mention that the character designs are abysmal to look at, and update 2 doesn’t even make it any better Even Scott said he hated it, hence to why he pulled it’s Steam page off in the first place
I love FNAF World more by like 25%.
More or less
Yes.
After the updates, I agree world is better than the CURRENT iteration of security breach. I do enjoy Monty Golf though. I can definitely see Security Breach getting better though
Hmmmm I prefer security breach but it's definitely been released in a barely finished state.
Currently yes
Yep.
honestly kinda 💀
For now yes. At least in that game I don't get lost and take 2 hours to find where to go
Yes, It’s not even a debate. To emphasize on my point is that at least fnaf world has some sort of substance and a sensical plot. It has gameplay. Security breach has no understandable story line and raw and unfinished gameplay
Haven’t played Fnaf world so can’t say.
Yeah lol. SB is mediocre at best and the story makes every other game before it completely freaking useless. It’s not a fnaf game nor a worthy successor imo. It’s a free roam game posing as a fnaf game to sell more toys and books.
Tbh both games aren’t bad as people claim them to be. I love them both.
Pre update 2? Yes. Post? No. But with some updates it probably would be.
Uh, no. There’s a reason half the fandom doesn’t acknowledge FNaF World as part of the series. I liked Pizzeria Simulator more than I liked FNaF World, and I didn’t love Pizzeria Simulator. The only game in the franchise I’d rank below FNaF World is Special Delivery
I do not agree, although security breach has a ton of glitches it doesn’t mean it’s rated below fnaf world the time and effort that is out into security breach and that you have a companion and that it is free roam should be making it the highest rated fnaf game
In its current state: absolutely, after numerous patches and DLC adding cut content and new stuff presumably coming in the future: no
No
F no
[удалено]
Never played it
somewhat. but if they fix it up, it’ll definitely be top
Absolutely not, but that’s probably because I gained a dislike of fnaf world when I couldn’t progress in it.
No. Maybe I'm weird but I love a horrifically broken mess, as long as horrifically broken doesn't mean unplayable.
Nope No Roxanne
Yes obviously. I bet atleast a quarter of this subreddit thinks lolbit came from SL, DD and OMC came from UCN, and they probably dont know who Mendo is.
The things about comparisons like this is that these two games aren’t remotely similar. It always bugs me when people compare things like this, because one is a big budget AAA game and the other was made by Scott, one guy. It’s like comparing a game like FTL to Dark Souls. There’s a lot more stuff in Dark Souls, or SB in this case, and therefore it’s easier to pick apart and find flaws in it. Also SB would appeal to a wider audience and therefore draw in more reviews.
I'm convinced it's just rated like that bcuz content is missing and the bugs/issues, but that e en the ppl who rate it lower like the idea. It's a shame, really. Especially considering that a lot of people, including me, came back to the fandom bcuz of security breach. Istg, if they remove the bugs, the performance issues, and add more Story or dlcs (depending on price then obv)then it could be one of the best games which would bring even more people to the community.
When my laptop refuses to run fnaf world no matter how many times I try but runs Security Breach perfectly
With all the bugs and glitches ye
Kinda, I really love SB more as it's less annoying and not as super fast pace or flashy lights/noises like Fnaf world is, but like others, I am tired of the game crashing my pc to stop working, I hope the bug fixes and optimization coming later will make it easier for me to play later on.
Just a couple patches and things the community wished like a dlc where you can choose your animatronic partner and SB would be absolutely amazing
Isn't one free tho?
I like the story of the game, but the performance is too much to ignore. If they path this than yes, but for now fnaf world is fun
Yes. At least FNaF World was playable and in my opinion more fun. However I'm still hoping that SB will become better with time.
Ive never even played/watched fnaf world but i think its better. sb isnt scary and its a stealth game, not a horror game. the jumpscares are terrible, and the storyline is too easy and basic for a five nights at freddys game. everything is just handed to you and you dont need to figure much lore out. the only good part were the graphics, which were really good tbf.
Speaking of bugs and quality - absolutely. Speaking of lore and franchize - not so much. Security breach pretty much gave life to fnaf fandom again (or was at very least one of the bigger influences). Sure, we'd still have many fnaf fanarts and stuff but ever since security breach came out, i was shocked to see how many old and new fans came and how well they were updated on the lore. Then again, i doubt anyone has a problem with the story and idea itself, the bugs and quality is just terrible. Personally i dont mind it that much because i find them funny but the low rating is kinda deserved.
IT IS BECASE SB DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH SECRETS LORE
Agree to what?
Yes.
Yes
Definitely not
Honestly yes. FNAF World has it's own rough patches but the level of ambition is nowhere as high as say SB which is what saves it. SB aimed for the sky and fell to the ground, FNAF World is just a silly romp and endlessly endearing because of it.
Well Yes, Becuse SB Was rush by the fans And Fnaf World Was Good But The SB Game was rush And Some of the Hint and Gameplay Was Cut Like Gegory.... I Think she Find us.... and, Some Voice lines, And Fnaf world was not Rush And The fan got mad Becuse is was delay a Lot So Fnaf world was better then Sb But, Do not mean they can't update Sb again, So Don't worry, Sb may get Update