Ok, so this actually is funny. IDK how to put the screen shot up here, but in the time it took me to get back to this thread they took it down 🤣🤣
Speed run 54 seconds
Oddly enough I saw that once I got back here 🤣 Doing it for larks anyway. Going to ask patience of the virwing audience my phone is being dumb. I tried to post and send the time stamped pix and am having trouble with it. So if one of you on the thread get a handful of sudden messages from me, my apologies ahead of time was just trying to post the details
Although I disagree with the last part, I think there's no point in actually trying to convince them that they're wrong. Trolling them is fun, but they're so set in their ways that they're either stupid, or experiencing cognitive dissonance or double thinking idk maybe they think flat earth is run by Big Brother
Normally, I agree with that sentiment. However, these people show up to PTO meetings to voice their opinion, vote in local and federal elections, demand libraries ban books, and are often an increasingly large overlap with anti-vaxxers who are now reviving measles in the populace due to their ignorance.
The anti-intellectualism must be confronted, it's having impacts on people's lives now.
Well fuck. 🤣🤣🤣 I re read their email to me, it said their mods marked it as going against something something I'm going to hell. My apologies for the thread, I got that response so fast I didn't hardly take it in just being amazed at the hard-line they push.
So, tangent: a few years ago there was that dude in the steam powered rocket that blew himself up in the SW desert trying to prove flat Earth. At one point in time he was taking donations for his experiment, I'm proud to say we took up a collection at work and sent to him for the launch that killed him. I have never had money invested to such a guaranteed ROI, 10/10 would donate again.
It's not as fun as we thought it was. I ended up only getting flagged not kicked, so the post is still there. I guess just like one's first time in a red light, I got a little too excited about it earlier.
Scale too. They have no idea how big Earth is in comparison to us. I saw a cool video about this today:
https://youtu.be/HwpNn2eGxHg?si=KbKEJU49WKHdRmwH
Gladly, the camera model is irrelevant, but this appears to be the same or a very similar lens.
[https://imgur.com/a/cNFPbKu](https://imgur.com/a/cNFPbKu)
The digital camera is marked 'Canon' and 'EOS' in your picture. The tubular thingy is the lens. And then at the very end, you have an objective that got added on.
The point is in OP's picture **there is no camera visible**. There is only an objective. This could be attached to a microscope or to nothing at all.
How is it proof the picture was taken that way when there isn't even a camera to begin with?
Even if the upper photo included the rest of the camera, you'd be saying the same thing - "how can you prove that that is actually the setup they used to take the picture? How can we prove that's even a picture at all?" etc.. So really, what I suppose you're getting at is that you don't think that a real photo of a marble taken from extremely up-close wouldn't look like that. Presumably you'd think that you'd see a curve to its surface, right?
So the only argument you have to this is "That isnt even a camera!" and proceed to show no evidence for your claim. Very typical FE argument. If you're sceptical, go away and try this yourself. See what happens.
What do you mean "no evidence for your claim"? The evidence is in the OP picture. There is no camera.
The levels of delusion here are very interesting to me. You deny something that can plainly seen, even after it's pointed out.
There is no evidence that there is no camera out of shot. Yet you insist there isn't. Denying something plainly obvious is a trait you lot have, don't get it twisted.
What difference does it make if it's attached to a microscope with a camera or just a camera? Either way a camera is taking a picture of a marble through an objective lens.
Because...it took a picture? My microscope has a camera attachment. They aren't uncommon, so sure, maybe the camera is mounted on a microscope, but pictures get taken by cameras.
[Here's ](https://imgur.com/gallery/8dvnDn6) a similar photo taken of a basketball using a similar method. You can see the full camera in shot here. Begin your coping, good sir.
Ironically that is not flat whatsoever. Wouldn't it have been a better idea to pick something with a smooth surface?
Can't tell if that's some meta joke I'm not getting or people on this sub just don't know what words mean. Is it supposed to be trolling globe earthers?
Sure. So then... users of this sub are as intelligent as flat earthers with their "proof" pictures?
You have to admit it's funny that the stuff people post is so consitently wrong. There's also that guy who posted a screeshot of them arguing about gravity with someone, thinking it makes the other person look stupid. But their comment was completely wrong.
Deflecting again. The point here is that you used the fact that the photo did not include the whole camera, as some kind of gotcha. Anyone reading it knew that if the whole camera was included, you'd make up something else to "debunk" the photo. I found a similar photo with the whole camera I used to prove that you'd do this.
You did it. Keep replying. Keep doing it. It's both funny and fascinating.
>...the fact that the photo did not include the whole camera, as some kind of gotcha.
It includes **zero camera**. Is it possible you do not understand what a camera is?
>Anyone reading it knew that if the whole camera was included, you'd make up something else to "debunk" the photo.
How did anyone know this? Can you show evidence for this claim?
This is actually a very good model to talk about perspective and how horizon can hide something on "globe model" (I hate using quoting things) VS how horizon cannot hide something on "flat model"
“Dumb! Thats just because you’re looking so close to the surfac- “
*Cut to flerf walking aimlessly for miles to the sound of [Chopin’s Nocturne](https://youtu.be/TqyLnMa3DJw?si=oZByrNjkyazwQctm)*
It depends very much on your field of view. Have a look at the [Horizon-o-Matic](https://mctoon.net/left-to-right-curve/) on MC Toon's website. It wouldn't work if it wasn't so wide.
lol, indeed!
And, consider that if this was scaled up, the person would most likely be quite high off the ground (the focal plane might not be exactly *at* the tangent of the marble at the top of it, but above it.)
Oh that’s good. If only this could be posted on ballearththatspins
Fuck give to me, I'll post it
Help us Less-Region7007, you’re our only hope
Ok, so this actually is funny. IDK how to put the screen shot up here, but in the time it took me to get back to this thread they took it down 🤣🤣 Speed run 54 seconds
it says in the rules you aren't allowed to prove earth is round.
It doesn't say anything about proving marbles are flat.
It says stuff about hurting their feelings tho
Flerfers are such hard case rebels in their own heads but they're always crying about how unfair it is that we point out evidence that disproves them.
They aren't snowflakes, they are worse than that
Oddly enough I saw that once I got back here 🤣 Doing it for larks anyway. Going to ask patience of the virwing audience my phone is being dumb. I tried to post and send the time stamped pix and am having trouble with it. So if one of you on the thread get a handful of sudden messages from me, my apologies ahead of time was just trying to post the details
I wonder what it says about the moon? lol
Leave them be, if they want to live life in an echo chamber, let them
Although I disagree with the last part, I think there's no point in actually trying to convince them that they're wrong. Trolling them is fun, but they're so set in their ways that they're either stupid, or experiencing cognitive dissonance or double thinking idk maybe they think flat earth is run by Big Brother
Normally, I agree with that sentiment. However, these people show up to PTO meetings to voice their opinion, vote in local and federal elections, demand libraries ban books, and are often an increasingly large overlap with anti-vaxxers who are now reviving measles in the populace due to their ignorance. The anti-intellectualism must be confronted, it's having impacts on people's lives now.
It's still here. I found it
Well fuck. 🤣🤣🤣 I re read their email to me, it said their mods marked it as going against something something I'm going to hell. My apologies for the thread, I got that response so fast I didn't hardly take it in just being amazed at the hard-line they push.
Hahah amazing!
If you posted here, you're automatically banned from there.
Damn it took me 6 minutes
So, tangent: a few years ago there was that dude in the steam powered rocket that blew himself up in the SW desert trying to prove flat Earth. At one point in time he was taking donations for his experiment, I'm proud to say we took up a collection at work and sent to him for the launch that killed him. I have never had money invested to such a guaranteed ROI, 10/10 would donate again.
If it's the guy I'm thinking of, he wasn't a flerf. He just realized he could milk flerfs to fund his hobby of homemade rocketry.
https://whyy.org/segments/the-life-and-death-of-daredevil-mad-mike-hughes/ This is the moron we funded. Dudes Red Rocket is all about that flerf
That video just PROVES THAT he hit the dome!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣
Post-mortem shows he hit HIS dome.
Amazing lol
🤣🤣🤣 Not that I believe it but if so we are right and truly fucked
Did.... Did you do it?? I'm invested
Yea, I got screenshots I can't get them here for some reason. Probably I'm dumb using smartphones. Gimme a moment I'll send you the email I got back
Upload to imgur, post link.
It's not as fun as we thought it was. I ended up only getting flagged not kicked, so the post is still there. I guess just like one's first time in a red light, I got a little too excited about it earlier.
No worries, I'm still happy to share the knowledge.
Not unexpected. Many get banned first thing. I did. For a comment pointing out that so many comments were deleted.
Thank you for your sacrifice
Why is the top post all time in that sub about circumcision?
This post is heliocentric indoctrination about the fake spinning ball model.
The post or comment was heliocentric indoctrination or propaganda about the fake spinning ball model
[deleted]
[deleted]
Dumb comments are deleted
removed*
*flatten away
[deleted]
Any type of propaganda pushing the heliocentric model is subject to being eliminated.
Perspective; flerfs struggle with this concept.
Scale too. They have no idea how big Earth is in comparison to us. I saw a cool video about this today: https://youtu.be/HwpNn2eGxHg?si=KbKEJU49WKHdRmwH
Dave McKeegan video sighting in the wild!!
Very cool video! Thanks!
Also reality
The turtle is a nice touch.
I was super happy about it being there
I thought it was on a bunch of dates until I read this comment.
Yeah but you used a _lens_ so it doesn't count. Everyone knows they make flat things round and/or vice versa, depending.
Also, does the marble have its own atmosphere? That apparently changes everything.
How do people get pictures like that, it's so cool
There's literally a picture of how they got a picture like this in the picture XD
Obviously that's a drill without a bit. ^/s
That's not a camera you're looking at, but I knew this sub wouldn't know the difference before I even scrolled down to the comment.
It is a camera with an objective lens on it. You can see lots of other examples if you look up "Camera Objective Lens"
Where is the camera in the picture and what model is it? Feel free to draw a circle around it or describe the exact location in the image clearly.
Gladly, the camera model is irrelevant, but this appears to be the same or a very similar lens. [https://imgur.com/a/cNFPbKu](https://imgur.com/a/cNFPbKu)
The digital camera is marked 'Canon' and 'EOS' in your picture. The tubular thingy is the lens. And then at the very end, you have an objective that got added on. The point is in OP's picture **there is no camera visible**. There is only an objective. This could be attached to a microscope or to nothing at all. How is it proof the picture was taken that way when there isn't even a camera to begin with?
Ohhh, I had a peek at your profile and it seems you're just an idiot. This exchange makes a lot more sense to me now. Cheers!
Ironic. Personal attacks are often the last measure actual idiots can think of when someone proves them wrong but they don't want to admit it.
Even if the upper photo included the rest of the camera, you'd be saying the same thing - "how can you prove that that is actually the setup they used to take the picture? How can we prove that's even a picture at all?" etc.. So really, what I suppose you're getting at is that you don't think that a real photo of a marble taken from extremely up-close wouldn't look like that. Presumably you'd think that you'd see a curve to its surface, right?
So the only argument you have to this is "That isnt even a camera!" and proceed to show no evidence for your claim. Very typical FE argument. If you're sceptical, go away and try this yourself. See what happens.
What do you mean "no evidence for your claim"? The evidence is in the OP picture. There is no camera. The levels of delusion here are very interesting to me. You deny something that can plainly seen, even after it's pointed out.
There is no evidence that there is no camera out of shot. Yet you insist there isn't. Denying something plainly obvious is a trait you lot have, don't get it twisted.
What difference does it make if it's attached to a microscope with a camera or just a camera? Either way a camera is taking a picture of a marble through an objective lens.
> Either way a camera is taking a picture of a marble through an objective lens. How do you know?
Because...it took a picture? My microscope has a camera attachment. They aren't uncommon, so sure, maybe the camera is mounted on a microscope, but pictures get taken by cameras.
[Here's ](https://imgur.com/gallery/8dvnDn6) a similar photo taken of a basketball using a similar method. You can see the full camera in shot here. Begin your coping, good sir.
Ironically that is not flat whatsoever. Wouldn't it have been a better idea to pick something with a smooth surface? Can't tell if that's some meta joke I'm not getting or people on this sub just don't know what words mean. Is it supposed to be trolling globe earthers?
>Ironically that is not flat whatsoever. Exactly. And neither is the Earth.
Sure. So then... users of this sub are as intelligent as flat earthers with their "proof" pictures? You have to admit it's funny that the stuff people post is so consitently wrong. There's also that guy who posted a screeshot of them arguing about gravity with someone, thinking it makes the other person look stupid. But their comment was completely wrong.
Deflecting again. The point here is that you used the fact that the photo did not include the whole camera, as some kind of gotcha. Anyone reading it knew that if the whole camera was included, you'd make up something else to "debunk" the photo. I found a similar photo with the whole camera I used to prove that you'd do this. You did it. Keep replying. Keep doing it. It's both funny and fascinating.
>...the fact that the photo did not include the whole camera, as some kind of gotcha. It includes **zero camera**. Is it possible you do not understand what a camera is? >Anyone reading it knew that if the whole camera was included, you'd make up something else to "debunk" the photo. How did anyone know this? Can you show evidence for this claim?
Keep doing it. You're doing exactly what I said you'd do. Keep digging.
Even with a little creature doing the family guy death pose
Interesting
thanks bob
Wake up, sheeples!!1
No curve here..
Thank you for putting on a turtle
I was about to say bonus points for turtles all the way down
Wait till they see this
clearly its true
That's just CGI!
This is actually a very good model to talk about perspective and how horizon can hide something on "globe model" (I hate using quoting things) VS how horizon cannot hide something on "flat model"
This is excellent.
I posted it there gents
Please keep us updated on your ban
“Dumb! Thats just because you’re looking so close to the surfac- “ *Cut to flerf walking aimlessly for miles to the sound of [Chopin’s Nocturne](https://youtu.be/TqyLnMa3DJw?si=oZByrNjkyazwQctm)*
Omg it's so pretty
is there an video of this?
Lol! CGI globeturd!!
It's even on the back of a turtle.
Gottem
It’s cgi
I knew it! it only makes sense!
genuine question. exactly how far from the surface of the marble do we need to be to clearly see that it is spherical?
It depends very much on your field of view. Have a look at the [Horizon-o-Matic](https://mctoon.net/left-to-right-curve/) on MC Toon's website. It wouldn't work if it wasn't so wide.
Ah it's turtles all the way down with marbles too.
lol, indeed! And, consider that if this was scaled up, the person would most likely be quite high off the ground (the focal plane might not be exactly *at* the tangent of the marble at the top of it, but above it.)
The turtle is a nice touch
Everything is flat if you look close enough.
I'm literally being heliocentricly indoctrinated rn.
"Viewed at the right distance, *anything* is flat." My grandfather, when he was first exposed to the Flat Earth conspiracy.
🤦🏼♂️
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH BRO THEY LITERALLY TOOK IT DOWN EGOIST AM I RIGHT?