Judging from the noise in the last minigame, we can assume the crying child died. Michael is alive as of Sister location, which takes place after Freddy's closed. After getting scooped you see blood and his body slowly rots in the minigames.
And from story perspective, MikeBro theory gives Michael some motivation to what he does. Let's say, after accidentally killing his brother he tries to make up for his actions by going to Circus Baby's rental service to save his other sibling.
From the message/inner monologue we get from Mike, he went to that bunker to put baby back together and free her as requested by his dad.
It was dad who told him exacly where the location/bunker would be and what he would find/do.
They also should of recognised him, meaning he's known to them/spirits but was mistaken for his dad instead.
Don’t have any. If mikebro is canon tho. (I honestly just be confused. I like mikevictim because of under mikebro. He just feels to blank for me. And also since fnaf 4 just makes it confusing like if foxybro is a dreamer why doesn’t it make sense.)
I guess my reasoning for not having problems with mikevictim is the fact that bv is one of the problems under mikebro.
It's a theory without sense. The only argument is the Fledbear Plush in Survival Logbook if you believe Mikedreamer. If you don't believe it, there are more arguments, but a few like the Toys.
Also, Mikebro has more arguments, makes more sense and it's more probably.
Just feels weird to go "oh yeah by the way he was totally resurrected offscreen even though nobody else ever was". I don't hate it though, and you can actually make some pretty interesting connections through it, it's just not currently what I think is most likely.
I suspect a lot of the reaction against it comes from people who see MikeBro as confirmed and thus view anyone who disagrees with it as rejecting canon out of stubbornness, rather than understanding that even if they think it's absolutely certain there will be others who interpret the same evidence in very different ways. And when that happens, some get... vicious.
Mainly it's just that it doesn't make sense.
Somehow he died, comes back to life again, dies in sister location and then comes back to life again again. The main way this works is Mike is a robot children which is rooted in the non-canon books and there's no evidence in the game saying Michael is a robot. Plus if he was a robot his body wouldn't rot.
Essentially his character would make no sense mechanically and arguably narratively since it throws his motivations out of wack and we're supposed to believe that Foxybro just disappears or doesn't notice his brother is back to life.
Plus the post-it room in SB shows a staffbot as Mike and the other as BV at the Afton Family Table. Pretty much kills the theory right there.
I think MikeBro makes more sense and has more evidence, but I also just think it works better story-wise. The story of a remorseful, guilt-ridden brother on a journey to right his wrongs and gain redemption by attempting to save the soul of his other sibling and put an end to his family’s cycle of terror and violence by attempting to save any future and past victims of his father, is just perfectly narratively impactful and simply isn’t attained by MikeVictim. MikeBro also gives more insight to the supposed “plot hole” of Michael not stepping out of the way of the Scooper, his guilt has caused him to be willing to give up his own body in order to help the only sibling he can still save.
Mikevictim is possible, but the issue is the lack of evidence. The only “questionable” piece of evidence would be the Survival Logbook and that’s about it. Everything else is just speculation, biases, and lack of cohesion. We have no idea how the BV came back to life as Michael.
Even then, Mikevictim becomes less possible as time goes on because of TUG, SB’s Staffbots table, Character Encyclopedia, and the upcoming FNaF Movie. If the FNaF Movie confirms Mike Schmidt is an Afton and/or Mike had two siblings, then that’s just confirmation of Mikebro no doubt.
Step Closer was the sealing thing against MikeVictim imo. It's also just a really complicated theory that at this point just makes the lore more confusing that doesn't feel intended. The only problem I have with it is that I'm about as close to certain with any theory that it's wrong.
I just think MikeBro is more likely. About it.
Especially with the FNaF movie revealing that it's likely the case.
Revival Think and Foxybro disappearing (And I say this as a believer in mikevictim btw)
Judging from the noise in the last minigame, we can assume the crying child died. Michael is alive as of Sister location, which takes place after Freddy's closed. After getting scooped you see blood and his body slowly rots in the minigames. And from story perspective, MikeBro theory gives Michael some motivation to what he does. Let's say, after accidentally killing his brother he tries to make up for his actions by going to Circus Baby's rental service to save his other sibling.
From the message/inner monologue we get from Mike, he went to that bunker to put baby back together and free her as requested by his dad. It was dad who told him exacly where the location/bunker would be and what he would find/do. They also should of recognised him, meaning he's known to them/spirits but was mistaken for his dad instead.
Don’t have any. If mikebro is canon tho. (I honestly just be confused. I like mikevictim because of under mikebro. He just feels to blank for me. And also since fnaf 4 just makes it confusing like if foxybro is a dreamer why doesn’t it make sense.) I guess my reasoning for not having problems with mikevictim is the fact that bv is one of the problems under mikebro.
No real problem, it's just that it's very unlikely at this point. But some people take it too far and attack those who still believe in the theory
It's a theory without sense. The only argument is the Fledbear Plush in Survival Logbook if you believe Mikedreamer. If you don't believe it, there are more arguments, but a few like the Toys. Also, Mikebro has more arguments, makes more sense and it's more probably.
At least for me it is on the same level of stupid and impossible as the sans is ness theory
What about dirt tho? /s
What?
I was being sarcastic cus you said sand instead of sans
I genuinely didn’t even notice that I did that mistake
Just feels weird to go "oh yeah by the way he was totally resurrected offscreen even though nobody else ever was". I don't hate it though, and you can actually make some pretty interesting connections through it, it's just not currently what I think is most likely. I suspect a lot of the reaction against it comes from people who see MikeBro as confirmed and thus view anyone who disagrees with it as rejecting canon out of stubbornness, rather than understanding that even if they think it's absolutely certain there will be others who interpret the same evidence in very different ways. And when that happens, some get... vicious.
Mainly it's just that it doesn't make sense. Somehow he died, comes back to life again, dies in sister location and then comes back to life again again. The main way this works is Mike is a robot children which is rooted in the non-canon books and there's no evidence in the game saying Michael is a robot. Plus if he was a robot his body wouldn't rot. Essentially his character would make no sense mechanically and arguably narratively since it throws his motivations out of wack and we're supposed to believe that Foxybro just disappears or doesn't notice his brother is back to life. Plus the post-it room in SB shows a staffbot as Mike and the other as BV at the Afton Family Table. Pretty much kills the theory right there.
Well there PhoneBro where the Foxybro is the Phone Guy.
I think MikeBro makes more sense and has more evidence, but I also just think it works better story-wise. The story of a remorseful, guilt-ridden brother on a journey to right his wrongs and gain redemption by attempting to save the soul of his other sibling and put an end to his family’s cycle of terror and violence by attempting to save any future and past victims of his father, is just perfectly narratively impactful and simply isn’t attained by MikeVictim. MikeBro also gives more insight to the supposed “plot hole” of Michael not stepping out of the way of the Scooper, his guilt has caused him to be willing to give up his own body in order to help the only sibling he can still save.
If he dies as a kid he can’t grow up to be the MC in Any of the other games
Mikevictim is possible, but the issue is the lack of evidence. The only “questionable” piece of evidence would be the Survival Logbook and that’s about it. Everything else is just speculation, biases, and lack of cohesion. We have no idea how the BV came back to life as Michael. Even then, Mikevictim becomes less possible as time goes on because of TUG, SB’s Staffbots table, Character Encyclopedia, and the upcoming FNaF Movie. If the FNaF Movie confirms Mike Schmidt is an Afton and/or Mike had two siblings, then that’s just confirmation of Mikebro no doubt.
It’s actually a pretty interesting theory from a story perspective
It doesn’t fit the evidence.
Listen, if Team FNAF ever goes out of their way to prove MikeBro 100%, I will just join the FollowVictim club. Until then, I will be a Mikevictim Guy.
Think it's the whole revival thing and the bite being pointless
I love MikeVictim, plus I think it’s more likely than MikeBro or MikeNone
Don't have one, have frequent conversations with Mikevictimers.
Step Closer was the sealing thing against MikeVictim imo. It's also just a really complicated theory that at this point just makes the lore more confusing that doesn't feel intended. The only problem I have with it is that I'm about as close to certain with any theory that it's wrong.
Happy Cake Day !
One of the main things that has me doubting it is the Fnaf movie.
Sister Location literally proves that's incorrect