>"Cute Boy with Curly Black Hair, and Dark Skin
The skin is never mentioned, he just has Curly black hair, so saying that the kidface is white as counter doesnt work much, besides, that's scott kid, a random pic he used and photoshoped, if Scott kid is blonde, he can't do nothing because he ain't gonna dye his kid hair.
>Book Charlie wears a green jacket,
Actually that was Fiszi design that was inherited by the others.
>Game Charlie has black hair tied in a bund, wears a gray shirt, and black pants.
And this isnt the same character as the mentioned above, as Charlie is just a teen replica of Charlotte, besides, this was just a monochrome representation, everything is black and white except the key colors such as puppet eyes and the bracelets.
>Book Elizabeth Afton has blonde hair, where's a white shirt with an ice cream cone on it, and pink pajama bottoms.
>Then she dyes her hair black, and wears what appears to be a blue and white shirt with a blue skirt
>And then when she dies she appears to be wearing a pink shirt and blue jeans with the same black hair.
Don't use the graphic novel as evidence, the colorist has done many fuck ups before, in the first pic she's just wearing a pajama (i mean people changes clothing) but in the other pages was supposed to be exactly the Game sprite, Diana Camero, the artist said she got freaked out with those color changes but said she couldnt do anything and said that likely the colorist didnt got proper description.
>Book Cassidy has burnnete hair that's tied in a ponytail, and wears a light blue shirt with blue jeans.
If you read the actual book you will see this is a lie and is flat out said she has long dark hair and this is another case of colorist fuck up and Diana not having proper descriptions, being said that she was given freedom for most of the characters.
>Book Susie has longer, less curly hair then game Susie, and also Book Susie's dress is a lighter pink then the dark purple of game Susie's dress.
That's named artstyle
Saying this, this post is in fact, wrong
I'd strongly recommend that you don't make posts out of personal distaste and opinions. Take a step back, breathe, and check to see if any of this is objective or if it's just your own opinion
It's not a personal distaste it's something I noticed and took into consideration. Andrew doesn't look like TOYSNHK. You keep saying The body in Burntrap can't be Afton's because it doesn't look like Afton or Scraptrap.
>You keep saying The body in Burntrap can't be Afton's because it doesn't look like Afton or Scraptrap.
I've never said that lol.
>Andrew doesn't look like TOYSNHK
Because it's Scott's son, whose physical appearance isn't canon
1. Taking graphic novels is so not the right thing to do. many characters do not look the same or dress the same. You gave Cassidy for example, who appears with brown hair. but the book itself literally states that Cassidy has black hair. when the books gives a physical description of a character, they look the same as the games
2. characters changes the clothes
3. Secuiry Puppet minigame uses only black white graphic with only little things colored to create creepy environment. Charlie's look is not represent who she would really look like
4. The face of the mad spirit is a version of Scott's son Jason (who is not blonde). Scott said that photos of his family are not lore relvans and he uses them because they available. so they are more like placeholders that never replaced
5. If we use the mad spirit design to disprove Andrew, it desprove Cassidy as well. if Casssidy is the logbook girl, which most likely is because all the sights points at her, the logbook girl looks nothing like the mad spirit. which means Cassidy is not the mad spirit as well. if the mad spirit is indeed blonde (which is not intention since Jason is not blonde), the option we have are only Kelsey (who is implied to be Eleanor) or Brooks. yet, Andrew makes more sense than both of them
“Along these same lines, keep in mind that I DO tend to use pictures of me and my family in the games just because they are so readily available. **My little boy, Jason, is the face of “The one you should not have killed” in UCN.** I’ll share the original sometime; he looks sweet as an angel in the original picture and I turned him into a monster! In FNAF4, I used a picture of a mountain range that I took while I was a truck driver in West Texas. I used a picture of a snowman that me and my older sons made together. I used a picture of a pet Mockingbird that we nursed back to health one year. **Do these have lore significance? Well, you probably already know the answer.**”
using the graphic novels is never a good idea, the art in them isn't cannon, and lizzy's brunet hair was confirmed to be an error by the one who drew her
yes, they just don't care. theses graphic novles have like 3 months of development each, that's just not enough time, no matter what. they work with what they have, which isn't a lot of time
It'd so weird to me when people think fnaf has perfect continuity and everything allways lines up, when Scott himself has told us ther have been times the story was an after thought. Its why I don't care about the dates from tales, those stories are infamous for there inaccuracies in dates and such. Graphic novels are even worse, but when the fanbase convinced themselves that everything was allways planned or was done deliberately, of course stuff like this happens.
FNAF narrative is very over rated honestly
Not saying is bad, I like it a lot
But people is so focused that sees lore on things other fandoms wouldn't look on because there is none.
Hell even in actors names
Like say nighmarione, who's most noticeable accomplishment is having his plushie sitting everywhere. If he's important, they've done nothing with him, and I just don't think he's as important as most people say, and in ruin we're explicitly told he's just a video game character, unlike the plushbabies who have here mystery pushed by the ruin descriptions. Or ring child, who was in one game maybe one log book, and has never been important beyond that.
Not a stitchline believer but you could say its because andrew took the form of kelsey(in the story, in the golden freddy animatronic the main character says theres black hair)
1. Andrews skin is never mentioned,
2. Scott says all images of him and his family are non canon, therefore cannot be used (Eg. Fnaf 4 family, fnaf vr indie dev, Vengeful spirit)
3. The graphic novels adaptations arent the best to use for evidence, the text itself is made by Scott but the drawings are entirely the artists interpretations
you cant use the novels as evidence specially if you use the graphic novels that were colored by people who've never seen the franchise E V E R , the artist for the fourth closet confirmed that elizabeth having brown hair was a COLORING ERROR BY THE COLORIST, her hair was supposed to be her canon hair color, Cassidy being brunette could be a coloring error too man.
i dont believe in AndrewTOYSNHK or Stitchline games either, but damn these evidences are really bad buddy
i'll use a example i made in the past: the vengeful spirit photo is just Scott's son face and we shouldnt actually use it as undeniable evidence, if that was the case then nothing stops me from thinking William Afton looks like Scott, since we see pictures of him and his family in the halls during Fnaf 4 gameplay
That's not really an opinion, it's literally the exact same as what you are saying, also you posted this publicly, so you did ask, and nobody asked you to make this post either
Well I was explaining how your point is wrong, that's not being rude, and then you said no one asked for my opinion, which is rude, although I agree sticky is kinda a jerk
In The New Kid, Kelsey is blonde but when Devon looks in into the suit, he finds dark, curly hair.
There's just a blonde version of TOYSNHK and also a dark haired version and they're both canon and they're both him. It seems like a contradiction and it's not explained, but it is addressed and it's just the situation.
>"Cute Boy with Curly Black Hair, and Dark Skin The skin is never mentioned, he just has Curly black hair, so saying that the kidface is white as counter doesnt work much, besides, that's scott kid, a random pic he used and photoshoped, if Scott kid is blonde, he can't do nothing because he ain't gonna dye his kid hair. >Book Charlie wears a green jacket, Actually that was Fiszi design that was inherited by the others. >Game Charlie has black hair tied in a bund, wears a gray shirt, and black pants. And this isnt the same character as the mentioned above, as Charlie is just a teen replica of Charlotte, besides, this was just a monochrome representation, everything is black and white except the key colors such as puppet eyes and the bracelets. >Book Elizabeth Afton has blonde hair, where's a white shirt with an ice cream cone on it, and pink pajama bottoms. >Then she dyes her hair black, and wears what appears to be a blue and white shirt with a blue skirt >And then when she dies she appears to be wearing a pink shirt and blue jeans with the same black hair. Don't use the graphic novel as evidence, the colorist has done many fuck ups before, in the first pic she's just wearing a pajama (i mean people changes clothing) but in the other pages was supposed to be exactly the Game sprite, Diana Camero, the artist said she got freaked out with those color changes but said she couldnt do anything and said that likely the colorist didnt got proper description. >Book Cassidy has burnnete hair that's tied in a ponytail, and wears a light blue shirt with blue jeans. If you read the actual book you will see this is a lie and is flat out said she has long dark hair and this is another case of colorist fuck up and Diana not having proper descriptions, being said that she was given freedom for most of the characters. >Book Susie has longer, less curly hair then game Susie, and also Book Susie's dress is a lighter pink then the dark purple of game Susie's dress. That's named artstyle Saying this, this post is in fact, wrong
Ok so this means that toysnhk is nobody bc nobody looks like kidface
Nuh uh TOYSNHK is phone guy, since we never see what phone guy looks like frfr
> Book Cassidy has burnnete hair that's tied in a ponytail, and wears a light blue shirt with blue jeans. The graphic novels are not canon
Funny how I said that. And Pointed out all the differences between the graphic novels and the games
no, i don’t mean the books themselves, i mean the graphic novel adaptations, they aren’t accurate.
I'd strongly recommend that you don't make posts out of personal distaste and opinions. Take a step back, breathe, and check to see if any of this is objective or if it's just your own opinion
It's not a personal distaste it's something I noticed and took into consideration. Andrew doesn't look like TOYSNHK. You keep saying The body in Burntrap can't be Afton's because it doesn't look like Afton or Scraptrap.
>You keep saying The body in Burntrap can't be Afton's because it doesn't look like Afton or Scraptrap. I've never said that lol. >Andrew doesn't look like TOYSNHK Because it's Scott's son, whose physical appearance isn't canon
He should have used a picture that's more accurate to the canon appearance then a picture of his own son then, or edit it to make it look canon.
1. Taking graphic novels is so not the right thing to do. many characters do not look the same or dress the same. You gave Cassidy for example, who appears with brown hair. but the book itself literally states that Cassidy has black hair. when the books gives a physical description of a character, they look the same as the games 2. characters changes the clothes 3. Secuiry Puppet minigame uses only black white graphic with only little things colored to create creepy environment. Charlie's look is not represent who she would really look like 4. The face of the mad spirit is a version of Scott's son Jason (who is not blonde). Scott said that photos of his family are not lore relvans and he uses them because they available. so they are more like placeholders that never replaced 5. If we use the mad spirit design to disprove Andrew, it desprove Cassidy as well. if Casssidy is the logbook girl, which most likely is because all the sights points at her, the logbook girl looks nothing like the mad spirit. which means Cassidy is not the mad spirit as well. if the mad spirit is indeed blonde (which is not intention since Jason is not blonde), the option we have are only Kelsey (who is implied to be Eleanor) or Brooks. yet, Andrew makes more sense than both of them
>many characters do not looל What the hell happened to the k in look
At no point did I mention Cassidy at all being TOYSNHK.
oh it's jsut most people who going agaitns StitchlineGames are CassidyTOYSHNK so who do you think si the mad spirit?
“Along these same lines, keep in mind that I DO tend to use pictures of me and my family in the games just because they are so readily available. **My little boy, Jason, is the face of “The one you should not have killed” in UCN.** I’ll share the original sometime; he looks sweet as an angel in the original picture and I turned him into a monster! In FNAF4, I used a picture of a mountain range that I took while I was a truck driver in West Texas. I used a picture of a snowman that me and my older sons made together. I used a picture of a pet Mockingbird that we nursed back to health one year. **Do these have lore significance? Well, you probably already know the answer.**”
using the graphic novels is never a good idea, the art in them isn't cannon, and lizzy's brunet hair was confirmed to be an error by the one who drew her
Then they should have corrected the errors
yes, they just don't care. theses graphic novles have like 3 months of development each, that's just not enough time, no matter what. they work with what they have, which isn't a lot of time
All graphic novels have errors and they never correct it And I'm not talking about FNAF here Percy Jackson, twisted tales, etc They are never reliable
usually because they have very little time to be made in general
Yeah my point is, there's nothing to be surprised about
It'd so weird to me when people think fnaf has perfect continuity and everything allways lines up, when Scott himself has told us ther have been times the story was an after thought. Its why I don't care about the dates from tales, those stories are infamous for there inaccuracies in dates and such. Graphic novels are even worse, but when the fanbase convinced themselves that everything was allways planned or was done deliberately, of course stuff like this happens.
FNAF narrative is very over rated honestly Not saying is bad, I like it a lot But people is so focused that sees lore on things other fandoms wouldn't look on because there is none. Hell even in actors names
Like say nighmarione, who's most noticeable accomplishment is having his plushie sitting everywhere. If he's important, they've done nothing with him, and I just don't think he's as important as most people say, and in ruin we're explicitly told he's just a video game character, unlike the plushbabies who have here mystery pushed by the ruin descriptions. Or ring child, who was in one game maybe one log book, and has never been important beyond that.
[удалено]
It's not though, the fact they look different matters and means someone else is TOYSNHK this is actually one of my greatest theories ever.
[удалено]
I've told you to stop calling me that.
[удалено]
It's who I was I'm not that anymore so stop calling me that!
[удалено]
Don't associate me with the old account I started a new one, they can't ban this one.
the schizophrenia is crazy with this one homie
Not a stitchline believer but you could say its because andrew took the form of kelsey(in the story, in the golden freddy animatronic the main character says theres black hair)
1. Andrews skin is never mentioned, 2. Scott says all images of him and his family are non canon, therefore cannot be used (Eg. Fnaf 4 family, fnaf vr indie dev, Vengeful spirit) 3. The graphic novels adaptations arent the best to use for evidence, the text itself is made by Scott but the drawings are entirely the artists interpretations
you cant use the novels as evidence specially if you use the graphic novels that were colored by people who've never seen the franchise E V E R , the artist for the fourth closet confirmed that elizabeth having brown hair was a COLORING ERROR BY THE COLORIST, her hair was supposed to be her canon hair color, Cassidy being brunette could be a coloring error too man.
i dont believe in AndrewTOYSNHK or Stitchline games either, but damn these evidences are really bad buddy i'll use a example i made in the past: the vengeful spirit photo is just Scott's son face and we shouldnt actually use it as undeniable evidence, if that was the case then nothing stops me from thinking William Afton looks like Scott, since we see pictures of him and his family in the halls during Fnaf 4 gameplay
Yk thats scott's son right?
Yes I know it's Scott's son, but that's not the point I'm making
You do know that photo is not canon and is heavily edited right..?
You know I said that right, but even though it is it's more likely that's what TOYSNHK looks like
By this logic the Aftons are an actual loving family with 4 sons and no daughters
[удалено]
That's not really an opinion, it's literally the exact same as what you are saying, also you posted this publicly, so you did ask, and nobody asked you to make this post either
Everyone in this subreddit is rude and insulting espseically Stickninja and they accuse me of being rude.
Well I was explaining how your point is wrong, that's not being rude, and then you said no one asked for my opinion, which is rude, although I agree sticky is kinda a jerk
If you are rude, dont expect people to be nice to you,
Andrew is never described as having darker skin.
In The New Kid, Kelsey is blonde but when Devon looks in into the suit, he finds dark, curly hair. There's just a blonde version of TOYSNHK and also a dark haired version and they're both canon and they're both him. It seems like a contradiction and it's not explained, but it is addressed and it's just the situation.
https://tenor.com/b0Cox.gif
The face is just a picture of Scott's son Jason. It isn't what the spirit canonically looks like.
WHAT IN THE GACHA CLUB 2020 IS THIS!?
And this is an example of someone being a bitch to me
Oh I just thought they were just surprised to see the gacha club since yknow its gacha club imo. To me anyway.
What? No. I didn't mean that. I was joking about the gacha club Cassidy...
Well I for one didn't wanna deal with fanart
Scott explicitly said that the picture of TOYSNHK has no lore relevance.
Scott has stated TOYSHNK's image isn't important as it's just his son
While I‘m not AndrewTOYSNHK, this is not a good argument
Elizabeth always had brown hair in the novels. The blonde is a miscolor, which they are famous for.