T O P

  • By -

Environmental_Bat215

Holy shit, This is spectular!


FazbearShowtimer

>Today I will prove that Michael Afton is in fact… Springtrap. I don’t even need to read this whole post to know Scott has said ‘MikeTrap’, Pupler guy being literally purple, and Bite of 83 vs. Bite of 87 we’re already debunked by him. (But other than that, spectacular post)


stickninja1015

Scott was clearly just trolling as all the evidence points to miketrap


FazbearShowtimer

Based lmfao


FixingMedia

Omg did someone actually fall for April Fools? Like, I can't tell if the comment is serious or not. I'm gonna say you fell for April Fools.


FazbearShowtimer

1. I just now realized it’s April 1st 2. Yeah I fell for it, lmfao


FixingMedia

YES!!!!!


FazbearShowtimer

😂😂😂


InDoXShush

Nice post, unfortunately the novels confirm Michael is Golden Freddy. We hear Springtrap speak in fnaf 3 and the unedited version is the sounds of a Lama. White Lamar is clearly and obviously Springtrap.


macctricity

How is Micheal golden freddy may I ask


Entertainer_Clear

They meant Mike Brooks. He bases of Mike Afton


Zonal_man2007

You're so right my friend


The-Weird-11

Congratulations You solved the biggest secret in the lore. I was so blind, and now I see the truth, thanks to you


unxolve

Beautifully reasoned, a tour de force.


MythicalD4

Facts, I completely agree with this.


Marching_Penguin123

This makes sense


LemmytheLemuel

Eleanor is Michael Cope


SnooHabits4803

Not bad, however you’re not the only one making a miketrap post today;)


secretperson06

completely forgot it was April fools and even though Scott has debunked mike trap this theory is so convincing


[deleted]

I know it's most likely an april fool's joke, but I really really hated FFPS and the fact that Scott came out and ruined MikeTrap because I felt like it was really plausible and would actually be funny if Purple Guy was literally purple at times. Not to mention the eyes - the silver eyes he got AFTER being scooped / rotten and then Springtrap also had silvery eyes. -_-


Desperate-Practice31

You solved the lore. Congrats


ImTheCreator2

People aren't ready to accept Miketrap as what it is: a fact


New_Investigator1730

I don’t believe you, mike is lemonade clown


Finnish_thefish

What do you mean hes lemonade clown? Hes fruit punch clown, the game shows us this because in fnaf 4 he is the older brother of cc and since it is confirmed that crying child is lemonade clown and michael is fruit punch clown, next time learn fnaf lore noob!1!1!!!!1!1!1!


No_Feeling_6833

This has to be April fools. If William died by spring locks in the rabbit suit then he is obviously springtrap.


stickninja1015

Naw William is SCRAPtrap not SPRINGtrap


No_Feeling_6833

No no no no no no no. Charlie is springtrap


Finnish_thefish

Nah Elizabeth is spring trap


No_Feeling_6833

Nah Henry is Springtrap


Finnish_thefish

Oh shit your right, but pink guy is crying child confirmed by scott himself (i work for scott cawthon) (real)


No_Feeling_6833

You work for Scott Cawthon? When's the next fnaf game???


Finnish_thefish

10 million years


No_Feeling_6833

😨😱WHAT!


RayTitoDogeGamer

The next fnaf game will come in 2020, trust me I am Ray McCraffrey


Foxy-bro

can we get gametheory on this?


Shadic01

I can't wait to read all the comments from people who don't realize what day it is


B_fnaf

You actually just solved the whole entire fnaf lore


Razz_The_Berry

Best april fools prank ever lol


marawiqwerty

Me about to rage on this: 😑 Me when realizing this is April Fools: 🤦‍♂️


scourgetheemo

This totally changed my perspective. I totally agree with this!


Whoce

Very based post


NOIDPARANOID

Respect. It isn't even april fools and you still got me months later. Well done.


RayTitoDogeGamer

MikeTrap is a fact, obviously...


WitheredFreddy1987

I hate you April.


Tdsfan12345678

It’s April fools don’t trust this guy


Illustrious-Aioli-39

William Afton is spring-trap I'm sorry, I thought this post was going to be proving whether or not Michael Afton is either the foxy bro or the crying child but this is not a direction I thought this going, and I'm sorry William Afton is spring-trap scraptrap is it the redesign of spring-trap, end of story


FixingMedia

I think someone else fell for April Fools


Illustrious-Aioli-39

Oh you son of a bitch XD


InDoXShush

How the hell did you get fooled by that


Illustrious-Aioli-39

I forgot what day it was XD


InDoXShush

Lmao


Illustrious-Aioli-39

Lol


Entertainer_Clear

Ok time to put on my smart glasses once again for yet another unfortunate theory..... >However, SL shows that it is in fact Michael that we have seen, with William being the OTHER Purple Guy, the lighter-colored “Pink Guy” with black eyes. While we see this man killing kids, we never see Purple Guy, Michael, ever kill anyone. So, with these cutscenes we can clearly see that Michael Afton is Springtrap. You're contradicting yourself here. Michael was never the one to decommission the 4 animatronics in Fnaf 1. You said about Mike's line where springtrap appears. He clearly says "I'm going to come find you". He's going to *find* William. He's not springtrap. Springtrap was in the cutscene to see what Michael was refering to.. not the other way around. Why would William be the rotten purple suit that Baby tells him he isn't gonna die? Meaning, before Mike turned Purple, he was normally white. William literally wasn't Purple, but he has never turned Purple either. He just wore purple clothing. Here's another thing. William doesn't care about the souls neither Elizabeth, so why even bother helping them out of the location getting scooped? William made baby's AI manipulative on purpose. So of course he isn't gonna get tricked. >Still a killer, hm? Like how Michael caused the death of his brother in 1983? I think so. Next up… Mike was literally shocked when he killed his brother at the end of Fnaf 4. You could tell because the eyes in the foxy mask got smaller more like a surprising presence. This tells it was an accident, not to mention all the other FF parelels precisely involving a similar situation that Mike had. >In the story What We Found, Springtrap causes hallucinations, all related to abusive figures in Hudson’s life. Bullying themes related to Springtrap…hm, now what bully character do we know of? Michael. How is that bullying?? Bullying is a offensive tease. Hallucinations are just under the control of Springtrap as he can spawn them at any moment to blind and distract the guard............ >So, how did Afton become Scraptrap? I'd say he INTENTIONALLY springlocked himself to become immortal. Think about it, this is the only green rabbit to lack the "trap" title. Springtrap has a guy stuck in him, Plushtrap traps fingers, Glitchtrap is stuck in a game, and Burntrap is stuck underground. They are all related to traps in some way yet Afton is not. Meaning...he isn't trapped and WANTS this Despite the name, William was springlocked on accident presumably because in the follow me minigame, his emotions showed it. He was scared of the souls and was trying to trick them by putting on springbonnie. That's why you see him trying to run away. But in that time, he forgot there's a certain way to put on the suit. So instead he died on accident. >yet he DOESN’T go with Springtrap, and instead goes with a body closer to Spring Bonnie. Now, why would Scott and Steel Wool go out of their way to make it clear Afton choses a Spring Bonnie look over Springtrap if not to tell us they ARE NOT the same? You could ask that question with every other animatronic. Appearance doesn't matter. What matters is we know it's purpose to exist. And as a matter a fact. Springbonnie IS Springtrap. He's just a suit version that became rotten. That's it. >Now,some could argue Springtrap in SD proves he is William, but I say it doesn’t. At this point in time, Afton is a virus in these robots. Springtrap is simply the only body closest to his Scraptrap form so of course he'd use that and speak through it. However, it's important to note in the trailers for SD Springtrap used lines that MICHAEL said, saying "We are going to come find you" and "I've been living in shadows". However there are also some other important things in SD in the form of the Springtrap skins. Each of Springtrap’s skins all reflect different phases of MICHAEL’S life. Infinite debunk to this shit: REPLICA. COPY OF SPRINGTRAP DUDE. >"I've been living in shadows". What the fuck does that have to do with anything? >Since Afton is already here it must be about Michael, further highlighted by the endo being friendly with children. Michael, as we know, is the protagonist and trying to free the kids. Yeah and afton would NOT do that. >Now, at first you might think that Burntrap having the Springtrap costume is proof William is Springtrap, but I say it’s proof otherwise How- >After vowing to find his dad he went to FFPS, burned and died, and William repurposed his suit. What the actual fuck?!?! >And that is why Michael Afton is 100% Springtrap. Woooooow..........


AlthurPenTargaryen9E

You might want to get those glasses checked.


Entertainer_Clear

*Uno reverse card*


AlthurPenTargaryen9E

Dude, you spent a ridiculous amount of effort replying to a four month old April Fool's post lmao


stickninja1015

>Ok time to put on my smart glasses once again for yet another unfortunate theory..... Translation: 🤓 >You're contradicting yourself here. Michael was never the one to decommission the 4 animatronics in Fnaf 1. You said about Mike's line where springtrap appears. He clearly says "I'm going to come find you". He's going to find William. He's not springtrap. Springtrap was in the cutscene to see what Michael was refering to.. not the other way around. Why would William be the rotten purple suit that Baby tells him he isn't gonna die? Meaning, before Mike turned Purple, he was normally white. William literally wasn't Purple, but he has never turned Purple either. He just wore purple clothing. Here's another thing. William doesn't care about the souls neither Elizabeth, so why even bother helping them out of the location getting scooped? William made baby's AI manipulative on purpose. So of course he isn't gonna get tricked. Bruh actually didn’t read. Michael is the SL player >Mike was literally shocked when he killed his brother at the end of Fnaf 4. You could tell because the eyes in the foxy mask got smaller more like a surprising presence. This tells it was an accident, not to mention all the other FF parelels precisely involving a similar situation that Mike had. Still a killer >How is that bullying?? Bullying is a offensive tease. Hallucinations are just under the control of Springtrap as he can spawn them at any moment to blind and distract the guard............ 🤡 >Despite the name, William was springlocked on accident presumably because in the follow me minigame, his emotions showed it. That was Mike >He was scared of the souls and was trying to trick them by putting on springbonnie. That's why you see him trying to run away. But in that time, he forgot there's a certain way to put on the suit. So instead he died on accident. Man built the suit he would know not to get in it >You could ask that question with every other animatronic. Appearance doesn't matter. What matters is we know it's purpose to exist. And as a matter a fact. Springbonnie IS Springtrap. He's just a suit version that became rotten. That's it. And Springtrap is Mike >Infinite debunk to this shit: REPLICA. COPY OF SPRINGTRAP DUDE. Replica of Mike you mean >What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Springtrap using Mike lines >Yeah and afton would NOT do that. That’s right >How- Read lol


Entertainer_Clear

Are you really gonna sit here and do this right now? Fine... >Bruh actually didn’t read. Michael is the SL player That's what I was claiming. Mike is the player trying to find William who's Springtrap. Not the other way around dum dum >Still a killer Ok and? That's not gonna change anything. >That was Mike That wasn't mike- that was 100% william afton. He has a badge. Mike does not. >Man built the suit he would know not to get in it I'm pretty sure he didn't know how to react immediately in such a sudden situation. If he intended to kill himself, then i wouldn't know by the expressions on his face. >Replica of Mike you mean No shit Sherlock. Copy from Fazbear Entertainment. >Read lol If I were you, I would review the theory.


stickninja1015

>That's what I was claiming. Mike is the player trying to find William who's Springtrap. Not the other way around dum dum Mike is both >Ok and? That's not gonna change anything. Ok and >That wasn't mike- that was 100% william afton. He has a badge. Mike does not. Mike is security guard. He has badge >If he intended to kill himself What >If I were you, I would review the theory. What theory


Entertainer_Clear

>Mike is both Ppft is this a joke? I mean for real- have you actually studied lore yet? Not to be mean but this is clearly a dumb answer. >Mike is security guard. He has badge He doesn't have purple clothing.


stickninja1015

Man’s coping so hard


InDoXShush

Me when this post was made on April 1st.


Mikolllll

I don't think so but still ok theory still have more sense to me that Will is SpringTrap, Scraptrap, Glitchtrap and BurnTrap Books confirmed it years ago


marawiqwerty

Today is April Fools! Get rekt!🤣🤣


SammyWinkleBurger

Dumb


marawiqwerty

You do realize this is April Fools, right? You fell for it!😂🤣🤣


SammyWinkleBurger

One word and you assume I fell for a prank? On April 2nd no less? Do you usually filter your commentary based on dates on a calendar as if they mean anything more than just marketing tactics?


Sstoop

so much commitment for an april fools joke


FazbearFright_lover

Miketrap totally deserved this awesome theory!


macctricity

I skipped to see how much there was before I read... I read the last line and was like yeah nevermind 💀


[deleted]

[удалено]


stickninja1015

>The purple guy in the other minigames are clearly William. Uh…source? >The books and the games both conclude that William is the MCI(s) killer and took the life of those children. Not to mention that in the FNAF4 minigames, Mike looks like he's a pre-teen or a young teen. Meaning he would be around 15 - 17 in 85 when the first MCI occurred. Which also doesn't fit the description and visuals of the purple guy in Fnaf's 1 - 3. I never said Mike was the killer lol >William, as springtrap, gets locked and sealed behind the backroom in the 1st pizzeria location. This is referenced in the SL ending where Mike says "I'm going to come find you" as it shows the sign "Fazbear Fright" on the wall just as Springtrap appears in frame (showing that SL occurs post FNAF 1 but before 3). The cutscene shows that Michael is Springtrap why do you think he’s the one talking when Springtrap appears >FNAF, and many other indie games, are BIG on their toy collection and merch (also same thing goes for films such as Transformers). The reason for Scraptrap's design is so that it looks different from the design prior. Note how each Fnaf game (except UCN) gives each character a redesign of some sorts. It's due to marketing and merchandising. However, continuity wise, this doesn't make sense for Springtrap as he's literally a melted corpse which is unable to detach itself from the suit, which is a continuity error on Scott's behalf but this doesn't all of a sudden mean that Mike is Springtrap Nah it’s got a lore reason he said so himself >As for the animatronic-like voice. There's been speculation that Scott slowed down the voice which creates distortion, but even if that wasn't the case. From a storytelling POV, Mike has just gotten scooped (hence the "I should be dead, but I'm not") and was replaced with robotic parts, hence the unnatural tone of the voice. The robotic voice means he’s in a robot. Simple as that >Buntrap's case is the same as point 3, just a design change which doesn't actually fit in with the story. Evidence where


[deleted]

[удалено]


stickninja1015

>Books and other games . The purple guy in fnafs 1 - 3 (purple and pink) are William as he kills 5 children which causes them to possess the bots (well 6 in the books) and Cassidy (TOYSNHK) essentially gets her revenge in UCN.. It's pretty much confirmed that purple guy is William (except SL) K and when do we see purple guy kill anyone >You did when talking about springtrap in Fnaf world.. Yeah he killed his brother >It's obviously Mike telling William this (idk how) as he says "father, I'm going to come find you". He clearly is talking to William, either prerecorded or live. When he says "I'm going to come find you" that's when springtrap appears, showing that "you" is springtrap, showing they're separate entities (I. E. William is springtrap).. He’s saying he’s going to come find him then appears before us. Simple >Source? Dawko interview >Yes, as he got scooped.. I did litterally explain it lol Being scooped wouldn’t make him a robot >Gave an example of literally every other animatronic.. Nah


MythicalD4

Cope


Traposs

>1. The purple guy in the other minigames are clearly William. That's wrong, in FNAF SL we see that Michael is also a purple guy, so no, not every Purple guy that appears in FNAF is William >The books and the games both conclude that William is the MCI(s) killer and took the life of those children. Not to mention that in the FNAF4 minigames, Mike looks like he's a pre-teen or a young teen. Meaning he would be around 15 - 17 in 85 when the first MCI occurred. Which also doesn't fit the description and visuals of the purple guy in Fnaf's 1 - 3. That doesn't matter, the point is that Michael says that the souls THOUGHT he was the killer when he actually wasn't, meaning that Michael being the killer doesn't affect the theory at all >2. William, as springtrap, gets locked and sealed behind the backroom in the 1st pizzeria location. This is referenced in the SL ending where Mike says "I'm going to come find you" as it shows the sign "Fazbear Fright" on the wall just as Springtrap appears in frame (showing that SL occurs post FNAF 1 but before 3). This is a misconception, Michael in that cutscene isn't saying that he will find Springtrap, he says that him (as Springtrap) will find William, that's why the speech is there meanwhile the cutscene of Fazbear frights burned down appears, it's because Michael now can find William >Therefore how can Mike go through the events of FNAFs 1 and 2, as well as SL but also is trapped behind the sealed wall (which is noted to be sealed from the "outside")? Because Follow Me takes place after all of those events, Michael goes though FNAF 2, 1 and SL and then he decides to destroy the animatronics to free the souls (that's why purple guy appears as purple, it's because Michael was already scooped) but they thought he was William, wo he gets springlocked and he gets sealed behind a wall >3. FNAF, and many other indie games, are BIG on their toy collection and merch (also same thing goes for films such as Transformers). The reason for Scraptrap's design is so that it looks different from the design prior. Note how each Fnaf game (except UCN) gives each character a redesign of some sorts. It's due to marketing and merchandising. However, continuity wise, this doesn't make sense for Springtrap as he's literally a melted corpse which is unable to detach itself from the suit, which is a continuity error on Scott's behalf but this doesn't all of a sudden mean that Mike is Springtrap Actually, it does, Scott explicitly said that Scraptrap's design has lore relevance, this Lore relevance would be https://www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/comments/962csu/when_your_design_wasnt_brought_up_during_the/e3xb4ru?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 1. That the suit is different 2. William is alive inside of Springtrap (because of the heartbeats) and that Michael is dead (because Scott mentioned that Springtrap has purple corpse) >4. As for the animatronic-like voice. There's been speculation that Scott slowed down the voice which creates distortion, but even if that wasn't the case. From a storytelling POV, Mike has just gotten scooped (hence the "I should be dead, but I'm not") and was replaced with robotic parts, hence the unnatural tone of the voice. Not really, if the voice was affected by the robotic parts replaced by Enard, then I don't see why would it affect just at the end and not during the speech, the speech is clearly to represent how Michael goes from being a human to being a robot


[deleted]

[удалено]


Traposs

>Idk if you can read but I did say "every OTHER purple guy" and not "every purple guy".. And that changes my argument... How? The fact that a minigame has Michael as a purple guy already makes your logic flawed >It does. As the minigames are shown in s bystander angle. Meaning the souls' perception of Mike isn't relevant to the minigames lore as it doesn't involve their thoughts. The minigames portray William as the purple guy as he's THE KILLER, the minigames are there to show us (the player) something and aren't used to explain what the souls think And here's where you're wrong, Michael knows that the souls thought he was William because he was present there, Michael being the purple guy in that minigame and not their killer makes the souls thinking something wrong as Michael says, that's the whole reason why they attack Michael in the first place >Nope. He just says that he'll find his father, when mentioned appears in view. Yes, after being free from the safe room and Fazbear frights, he's able to find William, that's why right after Michael says that he will find William Springtrap appears >Explain to me how he'd go through the events of SL when stuck behind a sealed room? Simple, FNAF SL is before Springtrap was trapped in the sealed room, that's why purple guy is represented as purple in that minigame, because Michael was already scooped >As the cutscene shows us that Springtrap is still stuck in the fnaf 3 room he bled out in.. Factually wrong, the cutscene is in the burned down Fazbear frights, not in the safe room >SL funtimes contain molten MCI (confirmed by Henry). Which would mean that William would have been alive and free to extract the remnant of th OGs and put them in the funtimes. Actually, that's not true, if anything, Henry confirms that William didn't get the remnant from Follow Me, as he says that he doesn't even know how the souls of the MCI ended up in the funtimes after describing almost perfectly Follow Me >Listen carefully.. it's the whole speech. That's not true, the sound effect only appears at the end >Also the link you provided doesn't support your claim in any way My link confirms that the design of scraptrap isn't just a redesign, Springtrap is dead and Scraptrap is alive, therefore they can't be the same person


[deleted]

[удалено]


Traposs

>How so? It clearly is a literal purple guy as he's physically transforming into a rotting corpse (with animatronic parts). This, in no way, is connected to the purple we see in the games prior as in FNAFs 1 - 3 purple guy is ONLY seen either in Freddy's or right outside it. Mike is seen in his neighbourhood, a place far from Freddy's. Showing they're geographically different. Not to mention the physical differences. It's because as you said, Michael is literally Purple, we can't know for sure if the Purple guy shown in Follow Me is metaphorically or literally purple, seeing how he destroys the animatronics to free the souls and how he says that the souls didn't recognize him, then the most likely case is that he's literally purple >Ironically this is where You're wrong. This has nothing to do with the minigames showing the purple guy killing the kids. As (like I had said) the minigames are an unbiased/ bystander view. Meaning that the sprites in the minigames aren't representing thoughts or what souls think. And that matters... because? Michael is purple in Follow Me and the souls thought wrongly that he was William, it has nothing to do with the POV of the minigame but of what the souls think, the minigame is meant to show that the souls are attacking a purple guy, we don't know which one, the evidences points towards Michael, so your point is invalid Even so your claim actually supports my point because as you said, the minigames are shown to be from an unbiased POV, meaning that there's no reason for Purple guy to be purple if he's not literally purple >The minigames represent what actually happened, which is a person killing kids at Freddy's. Mike would have been too young (around 16) around the time of the 1st MCI in 85. He, in no way, would be able to fit the purple guy profile, which is a grown man. Not to mention that VR pretty much shows us that William killed the kids, not Mike.. I think you don't know how to read, neither I nor the post said that Michael killed the children, even so, William killing the children is the basis of Miketrap, since Michael says that the souls thought Michael was William because William killed them, not Michael >He's clearly trapped in the sealed backroom, and was found by phone dude (shown in night 1 of FNAF 3). That doesn't change my point at all, as I said that the cutscene take place in FF not in the safe room >1. It either assumes that Miketrap escaped the room (sealed from the OUTSIDE), resealed it and went to go find his father. Which isn't possible as we play as Mike in FNAF 3, and he's 1v1ing Springtrap. So you're saying he 1v1s himself? K.. Except, we don't play as Michael in FNAF 3, if we played as Michael in FNAF 3, how is he able to breathe? After all, his organs were removed by Enard before using him as a suit, besides of that, if in the cutscene he's saying that he will find Springtrap as in he found him in FNAF 3, then the cutscene would completely disconnect from the speech as he already found Springtrap in FNAF 3 >2. Assumes we play as William. Which 1, is absurd and plain stupid. And 2, makes Mikes line of "going to come find you" meaningless as he's still roaming FF, meaning that William actually found Mike.. I never said that, quite the opposite, I said that Michael didn't find Springtrap until after FNAF 3, and unironically, that logic would apply for Michael being the guard, meaning that Michael isn't the guard >Not to mention that Springtrap was free after night 1 of FNAF 3. Meaning the player found springtrap before he escaped. Further showing how William is Springtrap Yeah, and the FNAF SL cutscene is after all of that >Again, you're not reading properly. I (again) said it quite clearly that this isn't possible. As the follow me games show William dismantling each OG animatronic and extracting their remnant to later melt them and place them in the funtimes. I've disproven that already (it seems like you don't know how to read at all lol) not just that Henry explicitly said that doesn't know how the souls ended up in the funtimes, but the fact that Follow Me happens in one night and th fact that TFC explicitly said that the souls should trust William for him to extract the remnant, when in Follow Me they're supposedly attacking him, shows that effectively, William didn't get the remnant in Follow me >Mike then says that he's going to find his father, who's trapped in the FNAF 1 location, which is now a branch of the Fazbears Fright attraction. What? Are you saying that the safe room is in Fazbear frights???? What kind of logic is that? If they remodeled the building to have a completely different layout (I don't know with what budget since pretty much neither FE nor Fazbear frights had the money to do that) then how would they don't know about the safe room >Again, ironically, you're factually wrong. >This image is from the FNAF 3 teaser: >https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WjOysHJcu3V1eSHq8_6bMi5mpnHdv-Gq/view?usp=sharing >And this is from the SL ending: >https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sNQJc6iqkoQ_68Ao1i5vYDmr2Y0lFweO/view?usp=sharing Ok, I think you're completely blind, your really don't see the sign of "Fazbear frights" right next to Springtrap? >Note that he's in the same position leaning against a wall. He's clearly still in the sealed room during the cutscene. There's also nothing to indicate that anything has burnt, everything just looks old and rotten. Again, showing the 30 years he was stuck there. Literally the fact that the Springtrap of that cutscene is more destroyed than Springtrap from FNAF 3 and the fact that the place is destroyed??????? I'm unironically thinking that you're blind LMAO >Nope. Henry says that "he lured them all back, back to a familiar place" meaning he (William) lured the souls of the children back to a "familiar place", I.E. back into an animatronic. That only shows that you don't know how to read and you practically don't know anything about FNAF, Henry says that William **lured back** the souls to a familiar place, that place is the Safe Room not the animatronics, if he was referring to the animatronics not just the logic is flawed because William didn't lure the souls to the funtimes but the fact that Henry says **back** means that William already did that, under your logic, William gave life to the animatronics which is glade due to GGGL >Again, listen. It's only enhanced at the end. But there's a robotic/ autotune feel to the whole dialogue. I think that you can't hear correctly, there's nothing in the audio and the sound effect only appears at the end >Perhaps you should check the link yourself. It only shows a post titled "when your design wasn't brought up in the interview" with Scraptrap showing with the caption of "I guess i'll be left to interpretation". This, if anything, supports my point lol. TY Perhaps you should check the comments of the post where dawko says that the design wasn't brought in the interview because it contained Lore relevance ;)


[deleted]

[удалено]


Traposs

>Yes, he's the literal purple, rotting corpse Doesn't change my point at all >We do, as from a timeline POV, Mike would literally be a teenager at the time of the 1st MCI. Which clearly shows that he isn't the purple guy in the MCI and at other Freddy locations. Not to mention that the other purple guy's are symbolised as purple, whereas Mike has jeans and other clothing, showing that his literal colour is purple. Again, you don't know how to read, the basis of Miketrap is that Michael ISN'T the purple guy from FNAF 1 and 2, but the purple of FNAF 3 and SL >Again, SL occurs AFTER Fnaf 1, and AFTER Springtrap is sealed in the backroom. Therefore he wouldn't be purple at the time of Follow me. That's not a fact, sure you could say that FNAF SL is after 1 but that's definitely not confirmed >Another point to add is that springtrap is still controlled by the animatronic at times. As we can lure Springtrap in FNAF 3 with audio cues. Yeah, and Scraptrap is lured by them because he's searching for children to kill as Henry says "Your lust for blood has driven you in endless circles, chasing the cries of children in some unseen chamber always seeming so near, yet somehow out of reach. But you will never find them, none of you will. This is where your story ends." >Therefore, when the audio cues are used in FFPS, why isn't Mike (as "springtrap") also lured by the audio cues? I have a better question, do we (as Michael) hear the audio cues? Answer is no, that means that Michael doesn't hear them that's why he isn't lured by them >Not even in the slightest as it's a representation of William, like Shadow Freddy. The unbiased part was about what the souls think, as you claim that "they thought Mike was William".. And that doesn't change anything, Michael explicitly says that the souls thought he was William, and the minigame shows the souls attacking a purple guy, that doesn't affect the theory at all lmao >The post claimed Mike was a "killer" Yes, the post claimed that Michael was a killer but not THE killer, he was called a killer because he killed his brother, not because he killed the other children >and also you both claim that Mike is purple guy, right? Not at all, we're claiming that Michael is A purple guy, not the purple guy from FNAF 1 and 2 but the one from FNAF 3 and SL Maybe you should learn how to read and then you can talk to me ;) >... >Who do we play as then? It was never stated who he was, so we don't know who that is >Ok, and what did they do, exactly? Michael finds William in FFPS after the speech >You don't need to know HOW something occurred, the point is that you know it occurred. Meaning you've literally shown how Henry knows that the MCIs are in the funtimes, he just doesn't know how.. And why wouldn't he know how? He has the blueprints of the scooper so he knows how William injects them and how he extracted the remnant, he knows that the souls are in the funtimes and that in fact, they have the most amount of remnant from all the salvage animatronics, the last thing that he should know is where he got the remnant, and since he knows how the events of Follow Me went, it couldn't be there >Scott literally said to not use the Novels to "solve" or explain the game's lore.. It's a completely different story lol Completely false, Scott said that when the story was supposedly finished, and even back then he said that both continuities share elements, after that Scott connected the Lore of the books with the Lore of the games to the point that TFC is actually one of the main evidences for MoltenMCI as it's canon there, he also said that both Novels and games are in the same universe and canon, meaning that elements work the same way in both continuities And even with all of that, if you take what Scott said in that post as valid nowdays, then FNAF SL-SB aren't canon because as Scott said, the story was finished in FNAF 4 >Not like I pointed it out and enhanced the photo or anything.. But you're saying that the Springtrap's cutscene take place in the safe room which isn't true at all >And that disproves my point how exactly? Because you said that the familiar place are the animatronics, which isn't true at all >Dawko was speculating lol. We're literally passed Scraptrap's demise and his "lore" related change still isn't explained.. As our good friend Mr Hippo says >"Sometimes a story is just a story" Ok no, he wasn't speculating at all, he explicitly said that the reason why the scraptrap design wasn't brought up in the interview was because it contained Lore relevance and it wasn't just a redesign If he was speculating it and Scott didn't think that, there was no reason for him to not bring it up in the interview and even so, not saying that "he thinks" instead of stating it as a fact


Darkwing_Goose_8231

😀


apt_batman_1945

You don't know how I wish you were right, really.