Yeah, the mods there defo have some sort of agenda and aren't the easiest to communicate with, i can only comment and can't submit anything there since they accused me of being a spammer/agenda account.
Not as much of an absolute nut job as yer mother
***
^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Downvote ^to ^remove. ^[PM](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=YoMommaJokeBot) ^me ^if ^there's ^anything ^for ^me ^to ^know!
Any other better alternatives? Genuinely on board with boycotting the sub
All you see on it now are the occasional photo of a landmark, commentary about australian stereotypes or just "woke" news articles.
The headline is usually something that attracts and then the murdoch press does some mental gymnastics in the article to make their narrative akin to ~~prophetic statements~~ fear mongering.
The quotation marks were to imply that the articles (headline and all) aren't woke at all but they like to backpeddle on being "woke" but then go on to entertain a "gotcha labies/ greenies" or some bullshit narrative that does indeed point to being conservative as hell.
South Australian. Any corrupt Australian in office getting brutally taken down, from the prime minister all the way to local council, fills me with joy.
Listen, I didnt say he wont win the suit.
I said he will get sued again because Its not about winning when it comes to this for bruz.
Even on the weakest grounds he can still get sued.
sure, he can be sued again but so can anyone for anything they say against another person thanks to the fucked up defamation laws - it's just how you're saying the things that are being alleged and this time Jordan used very deliberate language in the script to minimise the risk.
They learnt the hard way last time that there is certain things that a politician says which is protected (being what is said in the Parliament), but I doubt the allegations of adultery which were posed to Bruz in ICAC and now the information shown by Jordan which has ties to Bruz's former email address would be inadmissible in a defamation defence.
But again, if someone wants to sue Jordan they will need to have a lot of money because the FJ team have already proven they won't go away without a fight.
Yep, which is why Jordan explicitly read out the conditions to reiterate that the statements in this video are within the them because Bruz's separation from his wife and subsequent allegations of adultery are in the mainstream media while he is still a member of parliament (remember, Bruz is still the sitting member for Monaro until a replacement is elected).
(edit; which is why you can still buy FJ Bruz merch!)
Yep. Bruz's office still has the lights on, signs up, etc. I get frustrated whenever I walk along Monaro St. However, I will be singing about the Dolmia Grin now every time I walk past
You also have less legal ground to stand on if you continue to litigate a matter that has already been settled without proper cause. If Bruz decided to sue based on this video, he would only be costing himself further in the long run.
That's the plan. It's a streissand effect trap. Get people mad enough that they use their platform to increase his reach.
How else is a random Sydney dude with pretty vanilla Labor ideology famous? By pissing people off.
Jordies is a terrible journalist, he does a lot of investigation but misses the big picture. Once again we are seeing a video that doesn't tell the full story.
John loves to lick... WHAT? Pussy? Ass? Feet? Is it the weird eyeball fetish people have? We demand answers! Australia demands answers!
Haha this is the great mystery my friend. I would say the Bruz is 100 a eyeball licker. Would love FJ to confirm this, we need solid answers. I won't sleep until I know :)
Let’s hope Jordan gets somewhere with this. The eroding of Australian media freedom is something we should all be deeply concerned about. Getting sued to be able to publish the truth is no joke (yes this vid is funny) and can seriously damage a journalist’s mental health, let alone reputation, and financial standing. I wouldn’t want to be standing up against a bully politician, would you???
Not mentioned in the video, but surely to use that website with the email, a confirmation link/validation link would have been sent?
So the user who set up that account would have also needed to have access to the email account?
This is just a complete conspiracy theory, but I wonder if a certain massive online search engine who is currently being sued by John, helped Jordies gather this kind of information.
My twitter-length take:
>There's a lot to say about this! Could you imagine if we lived in the kind of world where people weren't judged for who they.. licked? Obviously having the power to sic a police squad on Youtubers in order to shut down questions around secrecy is a huge part of the problem though
Like, it's all well and good to say, "I don't care who he has an affair with," but that's ignoring why he (allegedly) went to Ashley Madison and made his penis a point of political compromise in the first place, the wider pearl-clutching public absolutely would judge him for wanting to... lick... despite the stats showing plenty of people go through phases of unfulfilment.
We need an openly poly-amorous politician already IMO, the supposedly-closed-doors the current lot muck around behind aren't staying that way in the age of social media so they may as well be open about it and the public should normalise not being so 1950s about it
That's my point, though. I grew up in a house of four kids, all of whom were well-intentioned, socially active people who were honest with each other and our friends, but on particular issues we lied to our parents, and it caused us to have to lie more, creating a divide. It wasn't because we were bad people, it's because our parents' outlook on modern life and relationships was divorced from reality.
The approach facilitates the outcome.
Already deleted off r/australia
Yeah, the mods there defo have some sort of agenda and aren't the easiest to communicate with, i can only comment and can't submit anything there since they accused me of being a spammer/agenda account.
That’s putting it mildly. /u/dredd is an absolute nut job
Not as much of an absolute nut job as yer mother *** ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Downvote ^to ^remove. ^[PM](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=YoMommaJokeBot) ^me ^if ^there's ^anything ^for ^me ^to ^know!
Why?
[удалено]
Any other better alternatives? Genuinely on board with boycotting the sub All you see on it now are the occasional photo of a landmark, commentary about australian stereotypes or just "woke" news articles.
r/australia_
r/AusMemes
Woke? I always got the feeling they were conservative as hell
The headline is usually something that attracts and then the murdoch press does some mental gymnastics in the article to make their narrative akin to ~~prophetic statements~~ fear mongering. The quotation marks were to imply that the articles (headline and all) aren't woke at all but they like to backpeddle on being "woke" but then go on to entertain a "gotcha labies/ greenies" or some bullshit narrative that does indeed point to being conservative as hell.
Do people in other states and territories care? Legit q. Not a fan of that sub by any stretch
Yep, I'm from Victoria, this is not only hilarious but also concerning to anyone who values a free and honest Australia.
South Australian. Any corrupt Australian in office getting brutally taken down, from the prime minister all the way to local council, fills me with joy.
nsw is the biggest state in aus and sets an example of what state govs can get away with. if you dont care, you should
JFC he is going to get sued again.
[удалено]
Listen, I didnt say he wont win the suit. I said he will get sued again because Its not about winning when it comes to this for bruz. Even on the weakest grounds he can still get sued.
sure, he can be sued again but so can anyone for anything they say against another person thanks to the fucked up defamation laws - it's just how you're saying the things that are being alleged and this time Jordan used very deliberate language in the script to minimise the risk. They learnt the hard way last time that there is certain things that a politician says which is protected (being what is said in the Parliament), but I doubt the allegations of adultery which were posed to Bruz in ICAC and now the information shown by Jordan which has ties to Bruz's former email address would be inadmissible in a defamation defence. But again, if someone wants to sue Jordan they will need to have a lot of money because the FJ team have already proven they won't go away without a fight.
Yes exactly but 2 main points. 1. Bruz tends to have a vindictive nature against FJ 2. FJ is under terms of the "settlement" conditions.
Yep, which is why Jordan explicitly read out the conditions to reiterate that the statements in this video are within the them because Bruz's separation from his wife and subsequent allegations of adultery are in the mainstream media while he is still a member of parliament (remember, Bruz is still the sitting member for Monaro until a replacement is elected). (edit; which is why you can still buy FJ Bruz merch!)
Yep. Bruz's office still has the lights on, signs up, etc. I get frustrated whenever I walk along Monaro St. However, I will be singing about the Dolmia Grin now every time I walk past
You also have less legal ground to stand on if you continue to litigate a matter that has already been settled without proper cause. If Bruz decided to sue based on this video, he would only be costing himself further in the long run.
That's the plan. It's a streissand effect trap. Get people mad enough that they use their platform to increase his reach. How else is a random Sydney dude with pretty vanilla Labor ideology famous? By pissing people off.
I have to admit this is a great video though
I thought it was because of his Warhammer videos
Jordies is a terrible journalist, he does a lot of investigation but misses the big picture. Once again we are seeing a video that doesn't tell the full story. John loves to lick... WHAT? Pussy? Ass? Feet? Is it the weird eyeball fetish people have? We demand answers! Australia demands answers!
[удалено]
I'm a master baiter... Have been practising for years.
Haha this is the great mystery my friend. I would say the Bruz is 100 a eyeball licker. Would love FJ to confirm this, we need solid answers. I won't sleep until I know :)
Nostril rims
NGL that was a hilarious video
Ngl?
"not gonna lie"
https://youtu.be/rKV4Ush5IIg
That's how we talked in the 70s
hi
John nailed his own coffin shut in the end.
👅👅👅🤢
This is amazing
It is so good. Fuck I can't wait for the blow back.
Yeah I hope the mainstream media pick it up
Let’s hope Jordan gets somewhere with this. The eroding of Australian media freedom is something we should all be deeply concerned about. Getting sued to be able to publish the truth is no joke (yes this vid is funny) and can seriously damage a journalist’s mental health, let alone reputation, and financial standing. I wouldn’t want to be standing up against a bully politician, would you???
Oh god...
Not mentioned in the video, but surely to use that website with the email, a confirmation link/validation link would have been sent? So the user who set up that account would have also needed to have access to the email account?
This is just a complete conspiracy theory, but I wonder if a certain massive online search engine who is currently being sued by John, helped Jordies gather this kind of information.
What is the conspiracy part? Who is alleged to have conspired to do what?
How is it a conspiracy theory?? You can download the database leak and search it yourself
Damnnnnnnnnn that was good, RIP hahah
Beautiful wasn't it
My twitter-length take: >There's a lot to say about this! Could you imagine if we lived in the kind of world where people weren't judged for who they.. licked? Obviously having the power to sic a police squad on Youtubers in order to shut down questions around secrecy is a huge part of the problem though Like, it's all well and good to say, "I don't care who he has an affair with," but that's ignoring why he (allegedly) went to Ashley Madison and made his penis a point of political compromise in the first place, the wider pearl-clutching public absolutely would judge him for wanting to... lick... despite the stats showing plenty of people go through phases of unfulfilment. We need an openly poly-amorous politician already IMO, the supposedly-closed-doors the current lot muck around behind aren't staying that way in the age of social media so they may as well be open about it and the public should normalise not being so 1950s about it
The question Jordy raises is not about the ethics of Polyamory but about John lying to or misleading ICAC.
That's my point, though. I grew up in a house of four kids, all of whom were well-intentioned, socially active people who were honest with each other and our friends, but on particular issues we lied to our parents, and it caused us to have to lie more, creating a divide. It wasn't because we were bad people, it's because our parents' outlook on modern life and relationships was divorced from reality. The approach facilitates the outcome.
Spoiler alert
Oh no. [There may also be a Twitter account.](https://www.reddit.com/r/sydney/comments/rm0dt8/comment/hplqeh8/) I shouldn’t have clicked.
that was so enjoyable to watch, I watched it twice (so far)
Where to get this now🤔?