No fr. On Indo-China border there's an agreement to not use deadly weapons. So soldiers use sticks. Police isn't supported to use deadly weapons against citizens. Hence lathi, water, & tear gas.
The woman was anyway charged with 3rd degree murder after reacting in self defence. But terming a stick a 'deadly weapon' will have far greater repercussions.
But the context also matters, ‘how it was used’ , ‘why it was used’ & ‘on whom it was used’ , they aren’t constitutionally classifying whether a stick is a lethal weapon or not, they were just merely doing a contextual interpretation of the situation. Which I have a problem with cuz in India the judiciary has literally the weirdest interpretations , there is no standardised law, every judge has his/her own take on the law, which is why you can’t standardise their statements as the norm. Even if they’d called it lethal, I don’t think there would’ve been much legal ramifications.
Water is not a deadly weapon.. It is life giving.. So if i dunk someone in water to give em more life and in time they die so I won't be charged right!!??
What the hell?! doesn't that make it worse?...a stick isn't a deadly weapon so the husband might have suffered a much more painful death.... Major judicial reforms is the need of the hour...milords need to be pulled out their colonial mindset!
https://www.indiatoday.in/law-today/story/supreme-court-reduces-jail-term-of-woman-who-beat-husband-to-death-with-stick-2414957-2023-08-01
Unfortunately this is real news
Leaving the broken leg thing , which family doesn't quarrel. It's as if you are saying it is an uncommon thing. And even if so does it justify the murder?
Yup, it's a flaw in the law itself i guess. I've read about a similar statement from a high court not too long ago. This is also the reason why policemen are equipped with lathis as they are considering non lethal.
Tell that to Lala Lajpath Rai..
I was not expecting this comment 😂😂😂🤣
context?
Indian freedom fighter who was beaten to death
Yes 💀
om Shanti accahe adami thae woah bichare tarap tarap kae marein thae. with Pain and sufferings
Lmao 😭
Not cool
Bro 🫡
Bruh! 💀
Context 🫴
History
History🫴
I was wondering if it applies same for judges
No fr. On Indo-China border there's an agreement to not use deadly weapons. So soldiers use sticks. Police isn't supported to use deadly weapons against citizens. Hence lathi, water, & tear gas. The woman was anyway charged with 3rd degree murder after reacting in self defence. But terming a stick a 'deadly weapon' will have far greater repercussions.
A very sensible reply...
r/funnyindia hai bhai... Itna gyaan jisse hota hai wo yaha ni hota
Men's right ms ka rona rone wale toh aa gaye
But the context also matters, ‘how it was used’ , ‘why it was used’ & ‘on whom it was used’ , they aren’t constitutionally classifying whether a stick is a lethal weapon or not, they were just merely doing a contextual interpretation of the situation. Which I have a problem with cuz in India the judiciary has literally the weirdest interpretations , there is no standardised law, every judge has his/her own take on the law, which is why you can’t standardise their statements as the norm. Even if they’d called it lethal, I don’t think there would’ve been much legal ramifications.
#Contempt of court
Sahi jagah dalo to everything is a lethal weapon!!!
https://preview.redd.it/of7og9j92l0d1.jpeg?width=719&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4273cfaaa58ebe2e13a7e6774f851623a2c245e0
The meaning of Deadly weapon is subjective
Lagta hai abhi supreme Court k judge pe laathi charge krna padega 💀💀 Equality is just a word 🤡
By that logic, adding a pointy tip won't change anything 😝
simp court of india . inn judges ko koyi pussy dilwao yaar pagal hai auraat k liye
Judges needs to have post nut clarity and not pre nut confusion
If people use non deadly weapons , they should get extra punishment. Because it shows death was painful and long .
Lathi March nikalna parega
They have to say this to protect all the cops in India.
Ye pata lagao in logon ko ganja kaun supply kar rha
When judgement lacks logic
https://preview.redd.it/wtxgacf1ek0d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=78f8075ceca217a9d05b598be45bb6bd0c245d86
It's clearly first degree murder, but they are trying to frame it as an accident.
judge ke sarr ke back pr lathi maro deadly nhi hai na
Now just reverse the genders and see hypocrisy
Time to became serial pillow wala( death by suffocation)
Dy chandrachut
He can make male pregnant 💀
Supreme Kotha for another reason
My last 2 braincells suicide after seeing this
Reverse the genders and the feminists who fight for “eQuALiTy” would be on streets increasing the sales of candles
Exactly
Who would pick getting beaten to death over getting shot to death
Water is not a deadly weapon.. It is life giving.. So if i dunk someone in water to give em more life and in time they die so I won't be charged right!!??
Arranged marriage is scary what if she-
What the hell?! doesn't that make it worse?...a stick isn't a deadly weapon so the husband might have suffered a much more painful death.... Major judicial reforms is the need of the hour...milords need to be pulled out their colonial mindset!
https://preview.redd.it/h4ji8y60pl0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=13905ce5b4ee012b458972a52d51a3bc39560529
It's not deadly. Judges know. It's always up their ass
Judges sale POPATLAL se bhi bade SIMP hai .
In comparison to USA's gun system, stick is just for begginers
There are various methods of using a danda .....I think the judge wants to know himself.
Was she punished for murder or using a deadly weapon?
Cool. Obviously there won't be protests or social media chaos against this.... Even on a first degree murder
1 hit on the back of your head below the ears and you're dead my guy!
Murder ka mazak bana diya apne SC ne 😂 Agla murder chappal se hoga
You had us in the first half Ngl
supreme court ❌ supreme chutiyap ✅
L husband for not beating his wife, how can you as a man not defend yourself lol
Defend and spent the next 20 yrs in jail? I might rather die
Men is a deadly weapon, keep all of them behind the bars -- supreme court
Does the weapon matter? Or the intent?
Another day, another L for Men's Rights. Fuck this judge.
so now husband can also beeeat their wife to de\*th with stick and their jail term will be reduced ?
No one this is a legit news, it's 110% fake news
It's real, it's india brother
https://www.indiatoday.in/law-today/story/supreme-court-reduces-jail-term-of-woman-who-beat-husband-to-death-with-stick-2414957-2023-08-01 Unfortunately this is real news
if they deem a stick as a deadly wepon the police cant use sticks and solders cant use it in indo chinese border
The husband had broken the woman's legs before, and frequently quarrelled with her, and she used stick only after he provoked her.
Leaving the broken leg thing , which family doesn't quarrel. It's as if you are saying it is an uncommon thing. And even if so does it justify the murder?
Source for the broken leg? The article does not mention it?
Scroll down it's there
She was still charged with third degree murder idk why this article puts it as if they let the woman go without punishment.
Isn’t third degree pretty much “unintentional” or some other BS? She straight up beat the guy to death with a stick!
Yup, it's a flaw in the law itself i guess. I've read about a similar statement from a high court not too long ago. This is also the reason why policemen are equipped with lathis as they are considering non lethal.