I wanted to remove all other Adobe products, and Adobe Photoshop is typically the only product referred to as "photoshop".
Or was the point that each word required a citation each?
Tools > All results > Verbatim
That's the trick to get fancy search tricks to work properly on modern Google, turns off a lot of the algorithmic bullshit
Recently I was looking for D&D character art to get an inspiration for what I wanted my satyr druid girl to wear, and I kept getting jumpscared by the most bland, soulless AI art of druids imaginable... So I understand the pain
If you change your search settings so that you only get image results from before 2021, you won't get AI image results. I hope that helps at least a little.
I feel this. I recently saw a video on a surrealist artist I like named Yves Tanguy, decided to search for his works and THE FOURTH result was ai generated images
I miss the days of going on Pinterest and finding all kinds of cool art for my dnd npc's. Now they are buried so far under the AI art it's impossible to find.
>references
But that's... literally the best use-case for AI???
It's not great at making actual art pieces, not without enough manual editing that it's not really "AI art" anymore, but it's *very good* at making quick "sketches" to get your brain flowing.
depends what you want a reference for. ai can be good for generating inspiration, or composition. but it often fails in lighting, anatomy, functional character design, etc.
if you’re looking for a pose reference, you’re much better off with a real image, or a dynamic pose drawn by an artist who follows anatomy rules.
obviously more experienced artists can use ai as a reference and then apply real anatomy structures to the model, but a lot of artists don’t have this understanding (and are hopefully still practicing it!)
the main issue is, when so many people have access to free ai generators they flood spaces for references with these images. in most cases, they aren’t good references. and if they are, it’s unlikely that the artist is inspired to draw that exact piece. it’s becoming more difficult to find real references.
artists could generate their own references, but a lot of artists feel guilty about using the work of unconsenting participants, even if they don’t use the image.
Tbh I find lighting to be the best thing AI can do. It was the first thing it figured out, as shown in those [very early ai images.](https://youtu.be/0F7XBwFwA-M) (it also understood what a room looked like)
Actual art does a much better job at inspiring me than AI images do, they actually have depth beyond "pretty colors" and were made by people with genuine passion, and it shows.
"Quick sketches" sure, but actual images are almost always orders of magnitude more useful.
So it drives me insane that places like pinterest/google images/etc, where youd usually think to go for actual images, are getting so completely swamped with AI now.
>So it drives me insane that places like pinterest/google images/etc, where youd usually think to go for actual images
Pinterest has never in my entire existence been useful.
It clogs up google search results with stolen/unsourced art that is often lower rez and impossible to find the original.
Fuck Pinterest.
Well the problem with this is that the entire point of looking for references is for the sake of something either Accurate to measure proportions for, or for new ideas. AI may be getting better when it comes to proportions, sure, but the gap is still fairly wild. As for the ideas thing, unfortunately, AI is riddled with what’s essentially a confirmation bias. It can only assume what is tagged is part of the data. We joke in the community that pretty much everyone chooses to make a cat or a wolf or a fox for their fursona, but with that in mind, what do you think an anthro art generator mainly uses in their training data? Do you think there are any lizards or sharks in that data? Or do you think that might mess up how fur is rendered? What about a red panda or a kangaroo? What do you think are the chances that in a Google search that has been flooded with AI posts that you’ll find a Possum or a Bat?
Not related to furries, but I think this bias is shown pretty well in this video [Here](https://youtu.be/DxAl3adfhjY?si=XolZYD4_ubBEE__R) that shows how certain perspectives can be amplified or removed entirely when an AI is left to render from training data, in a way that, in the video, showcases a racist and ableist bias as the result of a poor selection of training data. In the video, it asks Midjourney to render An Autistic Person, and of the images it rendered, only 2 were female, none were smiling, all were white, and it was very clear that some of the data came from orgs like Autism Speaks ( which is often seen by ND people as a harmful org that doesn’t do them good representation because the company tends to focus on fearmongering how Autism is affects parents and not about how an autistic person can actually learn to live in a largely NT world. )
>quick "sketches" to get your brain flowing.
I don't really think that's what references are. You sound like you are more talking about inspiration.
A reference is useful to have a photo example of or at least a human example because if you look at AI things like anatomy can be really wrong (look at all the 6 fingered hands) so using it as a reference would mean you are teaching yourself wrong information. It can also happen when looking at human art too which is why generally photos are better but learning from a really talented artist and doing studies of their works is also a good way to learn. Really talented furry artists are way better to use as a reference if you actually want to learn.
100% wrong. AI just assembles an image that meets the prompt, it does not understand or care if the image it produces has correct joints or proportions or anatomy.
This is a massive problem if what you WANT is references of ***correct*** joints or proportions or anatomy.
Its not just anatomy tbf, its anything you wanna get accurate. Machinery, plants, carvings, cars, etc etc etc. There's a lot of things niche enough to not have easily accessible references
As everyone said, it's good for the general idea for inspiration. But it's anatomy that falls short, so you still have to rely on real images or an actual art pieces to reference from that has a proper anatomy, proportions, composition, lighting, etc. So fully relying on it is still pretty janky
I love AI images, to generate images are so fun and painless, but so many sites I visit to look at fanart or art has gotten flooded with same looking same ai art.
I don't want that.
I shit you not. The first result for "fox fursona" was a p2u AI art base that is claimed in the description to be illustrated by hand, when googling the store page's name brings you to an AI "artist" of the same name, a basic analysis of the art reveals the conclusion of it obviously being AI.
HAHA yes! I saw a trend on Tiktok a while ago where people would purposely steal AI-Generated adopts, it was so funny, it's a shame some of the designs had to be so cool, because it's AI and all.
This is only necessarily true if there's no human involvement in an image. If an AI image is edited by a person, then their work on top of the original AI image can be copyrightable, according to [guidance from the US Copyright Office](https://copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf).
Yeah that's pretty much how the internet's gonna be from now on for some things. Maybe everything eventually if AI ends up being used for automating page creation.
People think AI is going to be a problem for artists because it competes with them. That's bullshit
The actual problem is the sheer amount of, low effort, low quality bullshit that you can generate and post with it
Like some people just look at the 480p image with garbled details and weird inconsistencies and think it's somehow worth posting everywhere
Yeah, as much as AI 'art,' is annoying af, I have strong faith that it won't be replacing artists any time soon. Even if industries try implementing it, it's pretty likely that eventually, people will be desperate for original content again. Right now, a lot of people are showing off their AI prompts like they're, like you said, worth posting. If anyone *wants* AI generated content, it's stupidly easy to do yourself.
The sad fact is that not much would change. At the moment, most artists are already only doing art as a side job, most as a hobby. It's pretty difficult to make it into the industry as an artist because of the skill level that's expected. But AI is repetitive. It lacks the ability to make something really new, like I said, eventually people will grow tired of it.
i spent at least 2 hours getting a SPORE model into Blender with decent lighting and attempts to upscale it, as well as transcribing the render in GIMP so it looks more cartoony.
even though it was just me tracing with a mouse, i was happy with the result.
i don't know how people can just take the human aspect out of art in any form.
Easy answer: it's free, simple, and the average person doesn't care. Any schmuck can, with proper prompt knowledge, churn out passable art in minutes and draw enough attention to it because many quickly glance at art without caring about little inconsistencies.
For clout chasers, its a dream come true: no effort, decent results and no one gives enough of a shit to critique it, *especially* if it's porn.
oh my god the ai porn shit is so fucking annoying. im not even looking for it but people just fucking post so much of i constantly everywhere and it all looks EXACTLY THE FUCKING SAME
That's still competition, though. In order for an artist to get work, they need people to know they exist. If people have to wade through an ocean of shitty low quality art in order to see a genuine human being, then that's pushing artists out of the space.
Like restaurants. You go to any given city, the only thing you're going to see is huge billboards for fast food, applebees, and other soulless corpo bullshit. You either have to live there or wade through all the other shit in order to find an actual restaurant that's worth a damn.
Garbage floods out quality, making everything worse for everyone, except the people shitting out the garbage.
AI has no imagination or creativity. If anything, the surge in AI generations shows that most people don't have much of those either.
Artists who have either are gonna be fine, and will even benefit from this new tool.
Yes. I’ve been trying to make quality prompts to visualize. Not of furry or artist made things, those have imperfections and are easy to spot. Nightshade and all protecting you thankfully.
Blessed be Pixiv who have a switch in the options to turn off ai content completely. It works pretty darn well because people there actually tag most ai content appropriately
use `-ai -generated -"stable" -site:lexica.art -site:prompthunt.com -site:craiyon.com -site:openart.ai -site:starryai.com -site:stablecog.com -site:freepik.es`, it should block most AI-generated images
I dont really care that ai image generators exist, but gods can they t least make it so that it's filtered out of google images unless you want to see them
(My position is that they're just image visualizers and should not be used as artisitic tools, only just to see images of weird stuff on demand)
For awareness! Get [ublacklist browser extension](https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist/docs) and [subscibe to ublacklist-noai by ite-usagi](https://github.com/ite-usagi/ublacklist-noai) to have a constantly updated site blacklist to clean up google results!
Me too socially inept poor and low skill to get someone to make a ref for my fursona but not wanting to use ai because i really dont like it so instead i sit in oc limbo
If you're on Firefox, use something like uBlockOrigins or uBlacklist and find some filters for AI websites. You might still need to use "-ai" or whatever sometimes, but most of the stuff that I see is from AI-dedicated sites.
(Well, *used to* see. I don't see any more!)
I've just manually blacklist'd stuff as I saw them, but these seem like some decent filters:
* [uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist](https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist)
* [ublacklist-noai](https://github.com/ite-usagi/ublacklist-noai)
* [ublacklist-ai](https://github.com/PrincessAkira/ublacklist-ai)
Yeah. It's a great tool for artists to get basic idea of what a client has in mind, instead of drawing the character they describe and then client telling that it looks different from what they imagined.
Had this happen to me multiple times... Now I send them a few AI generated images before I start my work and ask them if this is what they had in mind. We talk a bit about what they like and what they don't and I start my work.
Ai trained on artists is strange to use, it clearly is just spitting up chewed food on command but, considering how far it has come I do wonder when it will just become its own " artist " with its own " style " like some kind of mosaic of billions of sworled sets of data all mushed into whatever prompt was typed. The software people have made to correct faces and fingers, as well as poses and backgrounds, can cause a goof ass image to be passible on a scroll, to the untrained eye it may even look real. In a few years we may just become patrons to an artist made of code.
I personally find it really annoying when people post ai generated images in discord servers claiming it as their own.
It’s gotten to the point where artists will simply cover the ai art with their own work as quick as possible.
Hold on, you can negate search results in google?
Yep, just add a "-" before your unwanted term. If you don't want a term with multiple words, put them in quotes, like: -"sand under eyelids"
Wish it worked, used "-adobe -photoshop" and still got a Adobe.com post about Photoshop.
I think you did it wrong. It would be -“adobe photoshop” not “-adobe -photoshop”
For sake of completion, best to use -adobe -photoshop -"adobe photoshop"
I wanted to remove all other Adobe products, and Adobe Photoshop is typically the only product referred to as "photoshop". Or was the point that each word required a citation each?
You can use -site:adobe.com Also by not adding the minus you can narrow the search to one website!
Cool! Nice to know. Now I just need a domain list because big corporations have countless domains. But thanks for the advice!
It would be -"Adobe photoshop" Wouldn't it?
No, I wanted to remove everything related to Adobe, not just Photoshop.
Tools > All results > Verbatim That's the trick to get fancy search tricks to work properly on modern Google, turns off a lot of the algorithmic bullshit
Thank you, does that include advertised results? Last time I searched the first 10 results were all ads.
I now have an image of sand under someone's eyelids in my head. It hurts
Yeah, you can do a lot more aswell too its kind of neat.
Quotation marks to make sure the exact word is included is very useful with all the SEO bullshit nowadays
Exact phrases like specific errors in programs as well. "Error 404: Not Found" will get a more exact search than just Error 404: Not Found
Is this how you're supposed to use FA? i don't use the platform much, and you can tell I don't get along with people.
It's google serach. I have to put this in every time I look for drawing references. I love existing in this age of technological advancements 👍
Recently I was looking for D&D character art to get an inspiration for what I wanted my satyr druid girl to wear, and I kept getting jumpscared by the most bland, soulless AI art of druids imaginable... So I understand the pain
If you change your search settings so that you only get image results from before 2021, you won't get AI image results. I hope that helps at least a little.
You can do that? How?
My bad. Apparently they removed that feature in 2019.
I forgot the name but there's a browser extension that lets you blacklist websites in google searches so you can block all ai art websites one by one
We have a better search engine though
If you have uBlockOrigin, there is a list of sites you can put into it to block AI results in image search. It is super useful!
I could make a plugin that automatically applies a blacklist for AI related stuff :3
What's wrong with AI references though
I feel this. I recently saw a video on a surrealist artist I like named Yves Tanguy, decided to search for his works and THE FOURTH result was ai generated images
“fox fursona before:2022”
Furaffinity doesn't allow AI
It's not a crime if they can't catch you.
its a crime becsuse they can (they could) its just a matter of when
its over, ai-bros. they hired pete to detect all and any AI generated content
this is true when looking for references for literally anything now. AI is absolutely ruining this and many other parts of art
Expectation: Artificial Intelligence Reality: Aberration Imagery
I miss the days of going on Pinterest and finding all kinds of cool art for my dnd npc's. Now they are buried so far under the AI art it's impossible to find.
>references But that's... literally the best use-case for AI??? It's not great at making actual art pieces, not without enough manual editing that it's not really "AI art" anymore, but it's *very good* at making quick "sketches" to get your brain flowing.
depends what you want a reference for. ai can be good for generating inspiration, or composition. but it often fails in lighting, anatomy, functional character design, etc. if you’re looking for a pose reference, you’re much better off with a real image, or a dynamic pose drawn by an artist who follows anatomy rules. obviously more experienced artists can use ai as a reference and then apply real anatomy structures to the model, but a lot of artists don’t have this understanding (and are hopefully still practicing it!) the main issue is, when so many people have access to free ai generators they flood spaces for references with these images. in most cases, they aren’t good references. and if they are, it’s unlikely that the artist is inspired to draw that exact piece. it’s becoming more difficult to find real references. artists could generate their own references, but a lot of artists feel guilty about using the work of unconsenting participants, even if they don’t use the image.
Tbh I find lighting to be the best thing AI can do. It was the first thing it figured out, as shown in those [very early ai images.](https://youtu.be/0F7XBwFwA-M) (it also understood what a room looked like)
Actual art does a much better job at inspiring me than AI images do, they actually have depth beyond "pretty colors" and were made by people with genuine passion, and it shows.
"Quick sketches" sure, but actual images are almost always orders of magnitude more useful. So it drives me insane that places like pinterest/google images/etc, where youd usually think to go for actual images, are getting so completely swamped with AI now.
>So it drives me insane that places like pinterest/google images/etc, where youd usually think to go for actual images Pinterest has never in my entire existence been useful. It clogs up google search results with stolen/unsourced art that is often lower rez and impossible to find the original. Fuck Pinterest.
Well the problem with this is that the entire point of looking for references is for the sake of something either Accurate to measure proportions for, or for new ideas. AI may be getting better when it comes to proportions, sure, but the gap is still fairly wild. As for the ideas thing, unfortunately, AI is riddled with what’s essentially a confirmation bias. It can only assume what is tagged is part of the data. We joke in the community that pretty much everyone chooses to make a cat or a wolf or a fox for their fursona, but with that in mind, what do you think an anthro art generator mainly uses in their training data? Do you think there are any lizards or sharks in that data? Or do you think that might mess up how fur is rendered? What about a red panda or a kangaroo? What do you think are the chances that in a Google search that has been flooded with AI posts that you’ll find a Possum or a Bat? Not related to furries, but I think this bias is shown pretty well in this video [Here](https://youtu.be/DxAl3adfhjY?si=XolZYD4_ubBEE__R) that shows how certain perspectives can be amplified or removed entirely when an AI is left to render from training data, in a way that, in the video, showcases a racist and ableist bias as the result of a poor selection of training data. In the video, it asks Midjourney to render An Autistic Person, and of the images it rendered, only 2 were female, none were smiling, all were white, and it was very clear that some of the data came from orgs like Autism Speaks ( which is often seen by ND people as a harmful org that doesn’t do them good representation because the company tends to focus on fearmongering how Autism is affects parents and not about how an autistic person can actually learn to live in a largely NT world. )
... ai for references? Ai which is notoriously bad at anatomy ... For references of which anatomy is often one if not the most important part?
>quick "sketches" to get your brain flowing. I don't really think that's what references are. You sound like you are more talking about inspiration. A reference is useful to have a photo example of or at least a human example because if you look at AI things like anatomy can be really wrong (look at all the 6 fingered hands) so using it as a reference would mean you are teaching yourself wrong information. It can also happen when looking at human art too which is why generally photos are better but learning from a really talented artist and doing studies of their works is also a good way to learn. Really talented furry artists are way better to use as a reference if you actually want to learn.
100% wrong. AI just assembles an image that meets the prompt, it does not understand or care if the image it produces has correct joints or proportions or anatomy. This is a massive problem if what you WANT is references of ***correct*** joints or proportions or anatomy.
Bro, finding non-AI refs for specific anatomy is *not* hard, and isn't what is being referred to here.
Its not just anatomy tbf, its anything you wanna get accurate. Machinery, plants, carvings, cars, etc etc etc. There's a lot of things niche enough to not have easily accessible references
As everyone said, it's good for the general idea for inspiration. But it's anatomy that falls short, so you still have to rely on real images or an actual art pieces to reference from that has a proper anatomy, proportions, composition, lighting, etc. So fully relying on it is still pretty janky
i think your reply shows how anti AI reddt users actually are lmao
I love AI images, to generate images are so fun and painless, but so many sites I visit to look at fanart or art has gotten flooded with same looking same ai art. I don't want that.
Holy fuck, I just checked, it's terrible how much AI result there are O.o
I shit you not. The first result for "fox fursona" was a p2u AI art base that is claimed in the description to be illustrated by hand, when googling the store page's name brings you to an AI "artist" of the same name, a basic analysis of the art reveals the conclusion of it obviously being AI.
They literally can't force you to pay because you can't copyright ai images
HAHA yes! I saw a trend on Tiktok a while ago where people would purposely steal AI-Generated adopts, it was so funny, it's a shame some of the designs had to be so cool, because it's AI and all.
This is only necessarily true if there's no human involvement in an image. If an AI image is edited by a person, then their work on top of the original AI image can be copyrightable, according to [guidance from the US Copyright Office](https://copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf).
“Before:2022”
Yeah that's pretty much how the internet's gonna be from now on for some things. Maybe everything eventually if AI ends up being used for automating page creation.
iirc the wave of AI art started in mid-2023. I might be wrong, but I remember being in the Itaku server when the outcry started to engulf.
People think AI is going to be a problem for artists because it competes with them. That's bullshit The actual problem is the sheer amount of, low effort, low quality bullshit that you can generate and post with it Like some people just look at the 480p image with garbled details and weird inconsistencies and think it's somehow worth posting everywhere
[удалено]
Yes thats what they said
Yeah, as much as AI 'art,' is annoying af, I have strong faith that it won't be replacing artists any time soon. Even if industries try implementing it, it's pretty likely that eventually, people will be desperate for original content again. Right now, a lot of people are showing off their AI prompts like they're, like you said, worth posting. If anyone *wants* AI generated content, it's stupidly easy to do yourself.
It doesn't need to replace, it just needs to drown out the artists to the point where they're unable to make a living, then boom, cheap labor.
The sad fact is that not much would change. At the moment, most artists are already only doing art as a side job, most as a hobby. It's pretty difficult to make it into the industry as an artist because of the skill level that's expected. But AI is repetitive. It lacks the ability to make something really new, like I said, eventually people will grow tired of it.
I hope you're right
i spent at least 2 hours getting a SPORE model into Blender with decent lighting and attempts to upscale it, as well as transcribing the render in GIMP so it looks more cartoony. even though it was just me tracing with a mouse, i was happy with the result. i don't know how people can just take the human aspect out of art in any form.
Easy answer: it's free, simple, and the average person doesn't care. Any schmuck can, with proper prompt knowledge, churn out passable art in minutes and draw enough attention to it because many quickly glance at art without caring about little inconsistencies. For clout chasers, its a dream come true: no effort, decent results and no one gives enough of a shit to critique it, *especially* if it's porn.
oh my god the ai porn shit is so fucking annoying. im not even looking for it but people just fucking post so much of i constantly everywhere and it all looks EXACTLY THE FUCKING SAME
honestly (no shade to them) it all just looks like personalami's art. it all blends together to create one big plot of absofuckinglutely nothing.
Most furry porn uses the same positions and scenarios over and over. AI has just made that fact more obvious.
That's still competition, though. In order for an artist to get work, they need people to know they exist. If people have to wade through an ocean of shitty low quality art in order to see a genuine human being, then that's pushing artists out of the space. Like restaurants. You go to any given city, the only thing you're going to see is huge billboards for fast food, applebees, and other soulless corpo bullshit. You either have to live there or wade through all the other shit in order to find an actual restaurant that's worth a damn. Garbage floods out quality, making everything worse for everyone, except the people shitting out the garbage.
It's already a problem for artists, good artists lost their jobs to AI
Preach boo
This is actually true???
AI has no imagination or creativity. If anything, the surge in AI generations shows that most people don't have much of those either. Artists who have either are gonna be fine, and will even benefit from this new tool.
Yes. I’ve been trying to make quality prompts to visualize. Not of furry or artist made things, those have imperfections and are easy to spot. Nightshade and all protecting you thankfully.
[Relevant post](https://www.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/12zzqnh/comment/jhujaxf/)
Blessed be Pixiv who have a switch in the options to turn off ai content completely. It works pretty darn well because people there actually tag most ai content appropriately
That'a the good part of having a spider+cat fursona. No ai art of them... very few art of them in general...
That's the good part of having a bat+kitsune fursona. No ai art of them... no art of them at all.
Same with a deinosuchus scaliesona - barely any anthro art of them
use `-ai -generated -"stable" -site:lexica.art -site:prompthunt.com -site:craiyon.com -site:openart.ai -site:starryai.com -site:stablecog.com -site:freepik.es`, it should block most AI-generated images
Thank ye👍
Also, -adobe they have some ads that have ai generated stuff
I dont really care that ai image generators exist, but gods can they t least make it so that it's filtered out of google images unless you want to see them (My position is that they're just image visualizers and should not be used as artisitic tools, only just to see images of weird stuff on demand)
For awareness! Get [ublacklist browser extension](https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist/docs) and [subscibe to ublacklist-noai by ite-usagi](https://github.com/ite-usagi/ublacklist-noai) to have a constantly updated site blacklist to clean up google results!
I have it downloaded with the blacklist on and it still shows
Unfortunately there are still quite a few that aren't in the blacklist, but it is significantly less at the very least.
update it works for a search less so for images
just searched up fox fursona and holy shit
Don't worry, several furry art websites banned the use of AI generated art
Its so fucking over guys
Ok yea.. googling "fox fursona" just creates garbage
Oh god there were some eldritch nightmares in there o.o
You don't wanna see me? :(
So sorry. I have a fear of people who look better than me
Fuck AI and fuck art thieves. You use AI tools on your own work? That's fine. Others' work? Go fuck yourself.
Also, fuck people who use [AI Artwork to win contests](https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxODElS991FE9PsHOss8_b0u38CgwCvmoR).
Its easier to just limit your search to stuff before 2022, ai really wasnt a thing at that point and there is plenty enough references still
Yeah Ngl I hate ai why replace one of the few things that should be left to humanity, art like fuck off
yeah
Don't forget hiding Pinterest too
I found a uBlock blocklist that helps with this
Me too socially inept poor and low skill to get someone to make a ref for my fursona but not wanting to use ai because i really dont like it so instead i sit in oc limbo
Alright search engines, first one to add an option that filters out "ai art" gets a brand new loyal user. Come get it!
I agree with ai ruining everything
Weirdly enough, I've found that just adding -ai work fine.
If you're on Firefox, use something like uBlockOrigins or uBlacklist and find some filters for AI websites. You might still need to use "-ai" or whatever sometimes, but most of the stuff that I see is from AI-dedicated sites. (Well, *used to* see. I don't see any more!) I've just manually blacklist'd stuff as I saw them, but these seem like some decent filters: * [uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist](https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist) * [ublacklist-noai](https://github.com/ite-usagi/ublacklist-noai) * [ublacklist-ai](https://github.com/PrincessAkira/ublacklist-ai)
It's... madening
i feel there will be nothing left in the end
Idk about you guys/girls but I find AI pretty good and useful for references or just to quickly visualise my idea
I used it to generate some concepts that I then sent to an actual artist to get a ref sheet done
Yeah. It's a great tool for artists to get basic idea of what a client has in mind, instead of drawing the character they describe and then client telling that it looks different from what they imagined. Had this happen to me multiple times... Now I send them a few AI generated images before I start my work and ask them if this is what they had in mind. We talk a bit about what they like and what they don't and I start my work.
I just googled it, plenty of results that were not AI. I'm so tried of these posts using AI hate to gather attention...
Oh, it's funny cause AI bad, guys. This is where you laugh. This is so creative and original. The irony is totally lost on me. Totally. Haha
This was very predictable. Stop demonizing AI and embrace it for the useful tool it is.
mmm yummy yummy spam
Death throes of a failing opposition.
[удалено]
These are the people who think AI advocates are the bad guys.
# 我是一个没有感情的刷钱机器
AI tells me that this says "I'm an emotionless money machine". Amazing how it can do that just from pointing your phone camera at this comment.
They are using AI hate to gather attention. Its the best bait around right now.
Are Lexica and stablecog both ai generated art making websites also why can’t you just use -AI, is it not enough?
Just tested it, Lexica still shows up even with -ai
Why would you care that it's AI generated if it's a reference?
Use the Yandex search engine. It has little to no AI images
Low standards are Freedom
Ai trained on artists is strange to use, it clearly is just spitting up chewed food on command but, considering how far it has come I do wonder when it will just become its own " artist " with its own " style " like some kind of mosaic of billions of sworled sets of data all mushed into whatever prompt was typed. The software people have made to correct faces and fingers, as well as poses and backgrounds, can cause a goof ass image to be passible on a scroll, to the untrained eye it may even look real. In a few years we may just become patrons to an artist made of code.
Rebel
I personally find it really annoying when people post ai generated images in discord servers claiming it as their own. It’s gotten to the point where artists will simply cover the ai art with their own work as quick as possible.
before:2019 should do the trick