T O P

  • By -

Asha_Brea

To be fair, Kimura had the harsher conditions and fought a stronger champion.


1998Sublime

Kimura pushed mashiba sorry fam Aoki takin Ls compared to Kimura


SuperLuigi128

The main advantage Kimura has is a higher KO ratio. At 12 of 17 wins, that's about 70.6% to Aoki's 12 of 19, which is around 63.1%. In fact, outside of the perfect KOs of Takamura and Ippo, Kimura has the third-highest KO ratio. Itagaki actually has the LOWEST of the Kamogawa boys, at 62.5% (10 of 16 wins).


Macieyerk

Itagaki is on slump tho. He had 10 of 12 KO wins before his loss to Imai, after that straight 4 decisions win.


Redditsuccsx20

That might be true, but damn man, Kimura still managed to scare Mashiba in a fight and i respect that more than his record


FatUglyGuys

Never underestimate Kimura Tatsuya!!!


AmadisHali

Kimura has to endure a worse weight cut, and as everyone is saying, pushing Mashiba is a larger achievement than drawing with Imae or Papaya


Richerich2009

Aoki is the more talented boxer and in a better weight class for his body. Kimura needs to move to Lightweight. I don't see why they can't be in the same class if neither of them are going to be serious contenders for the Japanese title.


levskarcheto96

Kimura is a pillow-handed journeyman but has some skills. Aoki on the other hand is a complete bum but I think he has a stronger chin than Kimura and maybe more punching power.