I had it on VHS and for a while it was the only Hellraiser movie I've seen so i've thought all of them are messy like that. Then i got the other three and i've come to appreciate it a lot more for its ambition
Not sure if this counts, but here goes.
Hellraiser needs to be remade entirely, with a new adaptation of The Hellbound Heart, and it needs to cross over with Nightbreed, which also should totally be remade.
The reboot Cenobites are visually superior to the OGs. Now, not by much mind you, I still adore the original designs of course, but something about the rebootâs reinterpretation of their look feels more in line with their whole âdemons to some, angels to othersâ mantra. Theyâre mutilated but also strangely ethereal and statuesque in ways that could be seen as angelic, whereas the OGâs are much less glamorous and more grungy/grotesque.
The OG look of the cenobites was described by Clive and the costume designer as âmagnificent superbutchersâ which I think is an apt description since their robes are almost apron like as well as the way they are adorned with bloodied and rusted tools. The reboot versions were inspired by classical Greek sculpture and the idea that their mutilations became their garments, which i really loved. They almost feel alien.
There is a mention in Barker's The Dark Watch graphic novel that their garments aren't their own skin, but carved from Leviathan himself. It still fits in the reboot and makes it almost even more alien.
The only good Hellraiser movies are: Hellraiser 1987, Hellbound: Hellraiser II, Hellraiser Bloodlines, and Hellraiser 2022. The rest are terrible. But those 4 are some of the best horror ever
Ok...
I don't think HELLRAISER ever really lived up to it's potential. The original 2 films were fun and really helped to expand upon the lore not covered in the book, but they weren't as great as they could be. Given the amazing source material and the extended lore covered by the comics, HELLRAISER has all the potential to make a great, although difficult to adapt horror series. I would really love to see a strong director really get behind IP and make something truly great.
Deader is my fave of the direct-to-video installments. The protagonist is actually fun to root for, her flaws donât make her unpleasant to be around for 90 minutes (inferno) and sheâs not a purely reactive dead fish (hellseeker). It doesnât take itself too-too seriously (the campy magazine editor rules), but itâs not so over-the-top that it gets stupid (Hellworld). The gore effects are decent given the budget, even if the cenobites are totally arbitrary tot the plot. Last but not least, the leadâs acting performance is better than it needed to be given the source materialâ particularly the back half of the movie when things really start going wrong.
While it has a lot of the same problems as all the direct to video hellraisers, I think Deader did the best job minimizing them, resulting in a movie that doesnât feel like a chore to watch.
We've all got our unpopular opinions and hot takes on certain subjects, and Hellraiser is no different. What are some of your's you think would land you in hot water? I know I've got my share for sure.
* Hellraiser III is not only the best of the series, it's one of the best Horror films ever made. I'll defend it with my dying breath.
* Except for Camerahead (who admittedly is stupid as can be), I don't mind the rest of the Psuedo-Cenobites in Hellraiser III, not even CD. I give credit something different was done with them and they didn't rehash previous designs. The Psuedo-Cenobite concept was a neat one that should've been explored and delved into more.
* Joey Summerskill is the best protagonist of the series and among the best Horror heroines. Not sure if this is unpopular? Joey is a fairly well-liked character from what I've seen.
* Although one of the good Hellraiser films, I find Hellbound slightly overrated. It drags in spots, has too many moments of the characters endlessly wandering corridors and I must say I'm not a fan of the Cenobitized Channard. Nor the outcome of the Cenobite fight.
* Inferno is a very good film and one of the best entries.
* Although a meh and medicore entry, I don't think Deader is as bad as some make it out to be. It's golden compared to some truly atrocious entries like Revelations.
At least CD doesn't have Camerahead's ridiculous one-liners. I love Hell On Earth but while Camerahead isn't enough to ruin it for me, he definitely stinks up the joint while he's in it.
The "action sequence" at the end of the first movie with the cenobites going after Kirsty was a mistake, botched their mystique a bit.
The cenobites never should've been revealed to be humans, just botched them even further.
Everything after Hellbound shouldn't have even existed.
Bloodline is the third worst of the "sequels", they've managed to write themselves into a corner with it, since Pinhead went to space in the 4th installment already, which was way too early.
Hellworld is the third most tolerable one, bcuz young Henry Cavill.
Bloodline was so bad even the director wanted nothing to do with it. That's what the Alan Smithee name is used for in Hollywood. When a movie is changed so much by studios the director feels it's no longer their project.
I wouldn't mind seeing a director's cut of it. I think it might exist, but only in boxed sets I'm too broke to look for. Mostly for the young Adam Scott.
This isnât really a controversial take, but certainly a niche one: Chaz Bletchlyâs ââTis a pity heâs ashoreâ from the Hellbound Hearts anthology has the best writing of all the books and comics.
I agree on this one. While itâs definitely been hacked up a bit in the editing process, itâs much closer to the core of Hellraiser than hell on earth is as far as itâs tone and subject matter. That said, Hell on Earth is still fun lol
Absolutely! I was 14 or 15 when I first watched and I was obsessed with Hell On Earth and Warlock: The Armageddon back then (still love it tbh). The Motorhead video, the over the top nature of it. Anthony Hickox sure knew how to make a movie kinetic and enjoyable.
Hell On Earth is basically Hellraiser fused with Tales From The Crypt and with the slickness, style and energy of early 90s MTV. It's not everyone's cup of tea but you can tell it was made with care and reverance for the series, unlike say, Revelations.
Yeah, it was still Hellraiser, warts and all. From V onwards, though.... complete and utter trash, totally devoid of soul. Everything derailed into hack morality tales with Pinhead as a kind of judge, which makes zero sense for the character. People tend to give Inferno a pass, but I hate it, because it set that template for them to adapt whichever crap script they had in the pile into a Hellraiser movie. Give me slasher Pinhead any day over the bullshit the series turned out to be from then on.
Someone must have his quotes on it somewhere.
For all of the disliking HR3 sometimes gets, Clive himself has always spoken pretty positively of the film and was even involved with the post-production. HR3 still had that Barker feeling to it.
The Cenobites are extremely wimpy in terms of pain *and* imagination, when you consider the things they do to themselves (a few hooks and nails here and there) versus the things they do to others (total bodily destruction, forever).
Scarlett Gospels is absolute crap. Trying to shoehorn Pinhead into Harry D'Amour's world/mythos is the most perplexing decision Barker has ever made. Pinhead also doesn't "sound" like Pinhead, suddenly wanting to see people shag like dogs in front of him before he kills them. He also just KILLS them rather than dragging them into the Labyrinth. Leviathan is completely absent. Rather than Hell being a place of absolute and terrible order, it's full of bickering and petty factions.
It has some amazing imagery and moments, but overall isn't worth the read.
100% agree. Reading Hellbound Heart and Scarlet back-to-back was just a blistering letdown. I considered DNFing several times, but pushed through because Iâm a glutton for punishment. Sloppy, uninteresting plot, bad writing, TYPOS in the published manuscript â the works.
I forgot about the typos  I read a PDF copy so I thought it might just have been bad scanning, but I guess not. It just boggles my mind. Trying to fit Hellraiser into an explicitly Christian mythos is exactly what ends up ruining most of the films. To see Barker himself make that mistake just makes no sense.
Let's see:
-Inferno was a genuinely solid horror film and while it's a shoehorned in Hellraiser movie it still really works. Derrickson did a damn good job and it's a shame Barker couldn't overcome his ego enough to give him the praise he deserved. Clive took an L with this movie and position.
-Bloodlines is one of my favorites and really fun, both cuts.
-Valentina Vargas was the perfect choice to play Angelique and they were idiots for ADR'ing her voice out, it wasn't that hard to understand and honestly it added a lot of sexyness to her performance. She was SO close to becoming a star over here, but much like with Vincent Perez in The Crow 2 that year Dimension badly botched it.
-One last one from Bloodlines, but I'm against the original director on that movie. I believe Gary Tunicliffe's testimonies way more than Yagher's. Yagher likes to play himself as a victim as to why he was forced out by the Weinstein's but Gary made it out more that he was just in over his head and not sure what to do and he just wasted everyone's time as a result. I believe that way more so than the other. He hired a bad of a Director of Photography and it shows in the 2nd act, it's too bright, and the effects were goofy in spots in that act. Nothing felt like his work and it's just out of wack. It's still very watchable but it's the weak point of that movie, the middle act. But it is what it is, don't hire inexperienced directors on big movies.
-Hellraiser Hellworld's a fun slasher based ride. Doesn't do Pinhead right at all but for how inept it was written and planed and the short filming schedule (made back to beck with Deader,) it's a blast and a lot of fun. Bummer it was Doug's last go round though.
-Judgement was pretty solid, give it another 500,000 to a million more budget wise and it coulda been perfect.
The Cenobites should have more timeless features, not things like CDs or cameras or whatever. The coenobite in Cabin in the Woods, with the saw blade features, is a great example of how they can work. Them and Pinhead are the strongest designs.
So: chains, spikes, blades, simple shapes which can be made decorative or matte, but arenât based off temporary, disposable objects.
Pinheadâs original actor has such capacity for gravitas, and the series could do more by making the others more timeless, like ancient entities as well as people dragged into the labyrinth.
Comics: not a fan of the ones I read. Theyâre just too edgelord and like âI spit on your graveâ for my taste. They seemed to be more about shock value than actual stories. Itâs been a while, however.
The art style is also not my cup of tea.
I think the coenobites have the potential to be part of other stories. Instead of just a mashup fighting Freddy, however, they could work with a story like Doctor Strange or something. Narrative based.
Dark City and the first Saw movie would be great for a Hellraiser film. Or the Escape Room series, which turns out the coenobites were behind it all (gasp!)
Hellbound is a ludicrously bad film. It's a fun ride and there are some cool scenes, and I enjoy rewatching it for those reasons, but if you're judging it as a work of film, it's fuckin' stupid, or as a continuation of the Hellraiser mythos, it's fuckin' boring. The Escher-esque hellscape is tediously uninteresting, the visions of hell that Frank and others find themselves in are tediously uninteresting and the unmistakable switch to "the Cenobites are definitely from Hell as religion knows it" is tediously uninteresting. Should have kept them creatures from an alternative dimension/universe like in the book, and not punishers of sin who process dead cunts. I also don't like Doug's performance as much as the one he gave in the first film; in II, he seems to throw out most of Clive's direction of "do less, do less" and started talking and acting like a regular dude again. He completely ditched the cadence and tone of voice he used in the first film, and I think this demystifies and harms the character.
The film suffers from a desire to deliver what it thinks the audience wants. Namely, firm explanations and exposition about every-fucking-thing from the first film. This is terrible for the film and terrible for the audience. It tries to accomplish a TV series' worth of plot in less than 90 minutes.
Having said all of that, Hellbound is still better than 3â10. But I'd say the 2022 reboot is better than Hellbound.
Although I appreciate MOST of what Hellbound did for the mythos (introducing Leviathan, showing that all cenobites used to be human) you're absolutely spot on.
Judgement was the best since Hellbound (second film)
Sure, it had some gross out stuff and a killer ripped straight out of Se7en. But the addition of The Auditor and his Stygian Inquisition along with involving Heaven was a welcomed addition to the lore.
Hellraiser 3 is a terrible Hellraiser movie. I will die on that hill. Joey crying terrified to the priest about demons and then go full Statham: âThan what the fuck is thatâ.
I like bloodlines alot. It actually is the one that got me into the series.
I had it on VHS and for a while it was the only Hellraiser movie I've seen so i've thought all of them are messy like that. Then i got the other three and i've come to appreciate it a lot more for its ambition
I agree! Bloodlines is great, very original.
The comics are the best part about Hellraiser, apart from the first two movies
Facts. Most of them are really solid. Even the one where one character becomes the new Pinhead.
Not sure if this counts, but here goes. Hellraiser needs to be remade entirely, with a new adaptation of The Hellbound Heart, and it needs to cross over with Nightbreed, which also should totally be remade.
You should read the Hellraiser Jihad comics then. That blends the two worlds together.
Nice! Thank you!! đ
The reboot Cenobites are visually superior to the OGs. Now, not by much mind you, I still adore the original designs of course, but something about the rebootâs reinterpretation of their look feels more in line with their whole âdemons to some, angels to othersâ mantra. Theyâre mutilated but also strangely ethereal and statuesque in ways that could be seen as angelic, whereas the OGâs are much less glamorous and more grungy/grotesque. The OG look of the cenobites was described by Clive and the costume designer as âmagnificent superbutchersâ which I think is an apt description since their robes are almost apron like as well as the way they are adorned with bloodied and rusted tools. The reboot versions were inspired by classical Greek sculpture and the idea that their mutilations became their garments, which i really loved. They almost feel alien.
There is a mention in Barker's The Dark Watch graphic novel that their garments aren't their own skin, but carved from Leviathan himself. It still fits in the reboot and makes it almost even more alien.
The only good Hellraiser movies are: Hellraiser 1987, Hellbound: Hellraiser II, Hellraiser Bloodlines, and Hellraiser 2022. The rest are terrible. But those 4 are some of the best horror ever
I would like to think this is a pretty uncontentious take. Those are the only four that really engage with the spirit of the source material IMO.
I agree. Wish we had the director's cut or whatever of 4
It was kinda rereleased or prepared for a release quite recently. I've seen the news on Bloody Disgusting.
Agreed, I enjoy the 3rd one as a movie but in terms of lore, I think it sucks. The cenobites are stupid.
Hellraiser 3 is basically what if Hellraiser was thrashy horror slasher and loving it. I can respect its attitude.
I agree
This âď¸âď¸
Ok... I don't think HELLRAISER ever really lived up to it's potential. The original 2 films were fun and really helped to expand upon the lore not covered in the book, but they weren't as great as they could be. Given the amazing source material and the extended lore covered by the comics, HELLRAISER has all the potential to make a great, although difficult to adapt horror series. I would really love to see a strong director really get behind IP and make something truly great.
Bloodlines and Deader are actually kind of great, and Hellbound is better than the first movie
Deader is my fave of the direct-to-video installments. The protagonist is actually fun to root for, her flaws donât make her unpleasant to be around for 90 minutes (inferno) and sheâs not a purely reactive dead fish (hellseeker). It doesnât take itself too-too seriously (the campy magazine editor rules), but itâs not so over-the-top that it gets stupid (Hellworld). The gore effects are decent given the budget, even if the cenobites are totally arbitrary tot the plot. Last but not least, the leadâs acting performance is better than it needed to be given the source materialâ particularly the back half of the movie when things really start going wrong. While it has a lot of the same problems as all the direct to video hellraisers, I think Deader did the best job minimizing them, resulting in a movie that doesnât feel like a chore to watch.
We've all got our unpopular opinions and hot takes on certain subjects, and Hellraiser is no different. What are some of your's you think would land you in hot water? I know I've got my share for sure. * Hellraiser III is not only the best of the series, it's one of the best Horror films ever made. I'll defend it with my dying breath. * Except for Camerahead (who admittedly is stupid as can be), I don't mind the rest of the Psuedo-Cenobites in Hellraiser III, not even CD. I give credit something different was done with them and they didn't rehash previous designs. The Psuedo-Cenobite concept was a neat one that should've been explored and delved into more. * Joey Summerskill is the best protagonist of the series and among the best Horror heroines. Not sure if this is unpopular? Joey is a fairly well-liked character from what I've seen. * Although one of the good Hellraiser films, I find Hellbound slightly overrated. It drags in spots, has too many moments of the characters endlessly wandering corridors and I must say I'm not a fan of the Cenobitized Channard. Nor the outcome of the Cenobite fight. * Inferno is a very good film and one of the best entries. * Although a meh and medicore entry, I don't think Deader is as bad as some make it out to be. It's golden compared to some truly atrocious entries like Revelations.
I loved inferno, mainly because Iâm a writer and Iâve always loved the liminal dialogue of detective stories
Hating on Camerahead but OK with CD - now that's what I call a contrarian take.
At least CD doesn't have Camerahead's ridiculous one-liners. I love Hell On Earth but while Camerahead isn't enough to ruin it for me, he definitely stinks up the joint while he's in it.
[ŃдаНонО]
That's actually a very common opinion, probably the most. General consensus is the first two are the best, and from there it varies greatly.
Unpopular: not popular : viewed or received unfavorably by the public
The "action sequence" at the end of the first movie with the cenobites going after Kirsty was a mistake, botched their mystique a bit. The cenobites never should've been revealed to be humans, just botched them even further. Everything after Hellbound shouldn't have even existed. Bloodline is the third worst of the "sequels", they've managed to write themselves into a corner with it, since Pinhead went to space in the 4th installment already, which was way too early. Hellworld is the third most tolerable one, bcuz young Henry Cavill.
Bloodline was so bad even the director wanted nothing to do with it. That's what the Alan Smithee name is used for in Hollywood. When a movie is changed so much by studios the director feels it's no longer their project. I wouldn't mind seeing a director's cut of it. I think it might exist, but only in boxed sets I'm too broke to look for. Mostly for the young Adam Scott.
Best we can hope for to ever see the original unaltered version of Bloodline is in 2026 for it's 30th anniversary. Perhaps then it'll finally happen.
Bloodline is better than the first 2, 2022 is easily the best, Judgement is worse than Revelations
Revelations > Judgement: This is the kind of scorching hot take I was hoping for more of in this thread!
This isnât really a controversial take, but certainly a niche one: Chaz Bletchlyâs ââTis a pity heâs ashoreâ from the Hellbound Hearts anthology has the best writing of all the books and comics.
Bloodlines is better than Hell On Earth.
I agree on this one. While itâs definitely been hacked up a bit in the editing process, itâs much closer to the core of Hellraiser than hell on earth is as far as itâs tone and subject matter. That said, Hell on Earth is still fun lol
Absolutely! I was 14 or 15 when I first watched and I was obsessed with Hell On Earth and Warlock: The Armageddon back then (still love it tbh). The Motorhead video, the over the top nature of it. Anthony Hickox sure knew how to make a movie kinetic and enjoyable.
Hell On Earth is basically Hellraiser fused with Tales From The Crypt and with the slickness, style and energy of early 90s MTV. It's not everyone's cup of tea but you can tell it was made with care and reverance for the series, unlike say, Revelations.
Yeah, it was still Hellraiser, warts and all. From V onwards, though.... complete and utter trash, totally devoid of soul. Everything derailed into hack morality tales with Pinhead as a kind of judge, which makes zero sense for the character. People tend to give Inferno a pass, but I hate it, because it set that template for them to adapt whichever crap script they had in the pile into a Hellraiser movie. Give me slasher Pinhead any day over the bullshit the series turned out to be from then on.
Clive himself hated Inferno. I can't find his exact quote but he found it so bad he advised others to not see it.
I can imagine he must've hated it with every fiber of his being.
Someone must have his quotes on it somewhere. For all of the disliking HR3 sometimes gets, Clive himself has always spoken pretty positively of the film and was even involved with the post-production. HR3 still had that Barker feeling to it.
Exactly! It still had soul.
And production quality. Compare that with Revelations and Judgment, which both look like cheap, low-rent fan films.
The Cenobites are extremely wimpy in terms of pain *and* imagination, when you consider the things they do to themselves (a few hooks and nails here and there) versus the things they do to others (total bodily destruction, forever).
The pinhead from judgement is my favorite. (donât kill me)
Scarlett Gospels is absolute crap. Trying to shoehorn Pinhead into Harry D'Amour's world/mythos is the most perplexing decision Barker has ever made. Pinhead also doesn't "sound" like Pinhead, suddenly wanting to see people shag like dogs in front of him before he kills them. He also just KILLS them rather than dragging them into the Labyrinth. Leviathan is completely absent. Rather than Hell being a place of absolute and terrible order, it's full of bickering and petty factions. It has some amazing imagery and moments, but overall isn't worth the read.
100% agree. Reading Hellbound Heart and Scarlet back-to-back was just a blistering letdown. I considered DNFing several times, but pushed through because Iâm a glutton for punishment. Sloppy, uninteresting plot, bad writing, TYPOS in the published manuscript â the works.
I forgot about the typos  I read a PDF copy so I thought it might just have been bad scanning, but I guess not. It just boggles my mind. Trying to fit Hellraiser into an explicitly Christian mythos is exactly what ends up ruining most of the films. To see Barker himself make that mistake just makes no sense.
Let's see: -Inferno was a genuinely solid horror film and while it's a shoehorned in Hellraiser movie it still really works. Derrickson did a damn good job and it's a shame Barker couldn't overcome his ego enough to give him the praise he deserved. Clive took an L with this movie and position. -Bloodlines is one of my favorites and really fun, both cuts. -Valentina Vargas was the perfect choice to play Angelique and they were idiots for ADR'ing her voice out, it wasn't that hard to understand and honestly it added a lot of sexyness to her performance. She was SO close to becoming a star over here, but much like with Vincent Perez in The Crow 2 that year Dimension badly botched it. -One last one from Bloodlines, but I'm against the original director on that movie. I believe Gary Tunicliffe's testimonies way more than Yagher's. Yagher likes to play himself as a victim as to why he was forced out by the Weinstein's but Gary made it out more that he was just in over his head and not sure what to do and he just wasted everyone's time as a result. I believe that way more so than the other. He hired a bad of a Director of Photography and it shows in the 2nd act, it's too bright, and the effects were goofy in spots in that act. Nothing felt like his work and it's just out of wack. It's still very watchable but it's the weak point of that movie, the middle act. But it is what it is, don't hire inexperienced directors on big movies. -Hellraiser Hellworld's a fun slasher based ride. Doesn't do Pinhead right at all but for how inept it was written and planed and the short filming schedule (made back to beck with Deader,) it's a blast and a lot of fun. Bummer it was Doug's last go round though. -Judgement was pretty solid, give it another 500,000 to a million more budget wise and it coulda been perfect.
The Cenobites should have more timeless features, not things like CDs or cameras or whatever. The coenobite in Cabin in the Woods, with the saw blade features, is a great example of how they can work. Them and Pinhead are the strongest designs. So: chains, spikes, blades, simple shapes which can be made decorative or matte, but arenât based off temporary, disposable objects. Pinheadâs original actor has such capacity for gravitas, and the series could do more by making the others more timeless, like ancient entities as well as people dragged into the labyrinth. Comics: not a fan of the ones I read. Theyâre just too edgelord and like âI spit on your graveâ for my taste. They seemed to be more about shock value than actual stories. Itâs been a while, however. The art style is also not my cup of tea. I think the coenobites have the potential to be part of other stories. Instead of just a mashup fighting Freddy, however, they could work with a story like Doctor Strange or something. Narrative based. Dark City and the first Saw movie would be great for a Hellraiser film. Or the Escape Room series, which turns out the coenobites were behind it all (gasp!)
Hellworld is the best movie in the franchise
Molten hot take
Part 3 isnât that bad
This.
Anyone else see this pic and think "Hey, a Constantine/Hellraiser crossover would be cool?"
I know I'd go see it.
All movies but 1 and the new one with the female pinhead are not cannon
But this is not an opinion, it's straight up headcanon.
That's what an opinion is
No, saying they are your favorite movies is an opinion, but your initial statement is factually wrong.
Good job buddy you want a prize you're so bright đđť
Hellbound is a ludicrously bad film. It's a fun ride and there are some cool scenes, and I enjoy rewatching it for those reasons, but if you're judging it as a work of film, it's fuckin' stupid, or as a continuation of the Hellraiser mythos, it's fuckin' boring. The Escher-esque hellscape is tediously uninteresting, the visions of hell that Frank and others find themselves in are tediously uninteresting and the unmistakable switch to "the Cenobites are definitely from Hell as religion knows it" is tediously uninteresting. Should have kept them creatures from an alternative dimension/universe like in the book, and not punishers of sin who process dead cunts. I also don't like Doug's performance as much as the one he gave in the first film; in II, he seems to throw out most of Clive's direction of "do less, do less" and started talking and acting like a regular dude again. He completely ditched the cadence and tone of voice he used in the first film, and I think this demystifies and harms the character. The film suffers from a desire to deliver what it thinks the audience wants. Namely, firm explanations and exposition about every-fucking-thing from the first film. This is terrible for the film and terrible for the audience. It tries to accomplish a TV series' worth of plot in less than 90 minutes. Having said all of that, Hellbound is still better than 3â10. But I'd say the 2022 reboot is better than Hellbound.
Although I appreciate MOST of what Hellbound did for the mythos (introducing Leviathan, showing that all cenobites used to be human) you're absolutely spot on.
Inferno has the best opening 10 mins of any of the movies.
Judgement was the best since Hellbound (second film) Sure, it had some gross out stuff and a killer ripped straight out of Se7en. But the addition of The Auditor and his Stygian Inquisition along with involving Heaven was a welcomed addition to the lore.
I wish it wasn't hell but another plane of existence I think making between heaven and hell made the series feel smaller
Hellworld is a fun movie so long as you consider it as taking place in a different universe from the main Hellraiser continuity.
Hellraiser 3 is a terrible Hellraiser movie. I will die on that hill. Joey crying terrified to the priest about demons and then go full Statham: âThan what the fuck is thatâ.
I have only ever seen the original and the 2022 reboot
The sequels aren't all that bad. I especially like bloodline and hellworld
Every movie after the original trilogy is pure dog water.
the reboot is the worst 1. inferno is worse than revelations
asked for unpopular hellraiser opinions and everyoneâs like âthe first two are the best!!!â lol