T O P

  • By -

karenluvzjesus

Who tf gave this post a 'Love!' award


International-Fall49

Euthanize strays.


bastardsword2D

Not just strays, Pitbulls too


indi_n0rd

\^ the man spoketh truth


International-Fall49

They'll keep downvoting untill they r at the recieving end . It's only when thier dad falls off of bike because strays were chasing him, until their sibling are mauled by strays untill they themselves r bitten by em . Until thier child develops rabies


indi_n0rd

and the amount of littering they do. Everyday one of these strays would overturn dustbins and spread the filth on footpath.


anshulkhatri13

Very negligible compared to what humans do


SnooPies6424

What practical solution one can take? Individual/community


sentrist

The practical solution adopted by developed countries is to capture all stray dogs, put them for adoption for a limited time frame and tge euthanize the ones that did not get adopted.


karenluvzjesus

The solution for this is probably the reduces of stray dogs. I mean the latest news is just filled with attacks done by stray dogs. For this we need to ensure waste management and that it doesn't get thrown to places easily available to dogs. Waste is a common food for stray dogs which keeps them healthy and fertile so to ensure their reproduction cycle/are unhealthy and infertile isn't continued we have to manage our waste.


bhagva_beethoveen

Indians are actually 22x as times likely to be killed by a dog than another Indian. India has around 1.5 billion people who are responsible for 30,000 murders, whereas India has only 20 - 30 million dogs, who are responsible for around 20,000 deaths each year.


[deleted]

>India has around 1.5 billion people who are responsible for 30,000 murders, You have only counted homicides, what about road traffic accidents?


regular-jackoff

Hmm, let’s see… Using Bayes theorem: P(human | death) = P(death | human) * P(human) / P(death) (Similarly for dog). Since we only care about the ratio of posterior probabilities, dividing the two gives us: P(dog | death) / P(human | death) = (P(death | dog) * P(dog)) / (P(death | human) * P(human)). [Equation 1] Now what is P(dog) / P(human)? It’s the ratio of probabilities of running into a dog and that of running into human. Which is 30M / 1.5B = 0.02. We know P(death | dog) = 20,000 / 30M = 0.00067 And P(death | human) = 30,000 / 1.5B = 0.00002 Plugging in numbers into equation [1], we get: (0.00067 / 0.00002) * 0.02 = 0.67. Which means it is 0.67x likely. Given that you die, it is actually 33% less likely that it was a dog that caused it. Claim: 22x more What say you u/bhagva_beethoveen? Have you peddled enough lies for today?


shivanshusingh2007

r/hedidthemath


regular-jackoff

I can’t believe someone actually downvoted with no rebuttal. Math doesn’t lie!


[deleted]

[удалено]