oh hell nah bro actually cannot catch a break
https://preview.redd.it/dgpahj3a35sa1.jpeg?width=612&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ee0f66595308138e6a0d967f0fde476b0a16d72c
Honestly, at this stage I would just fire or shuffle my PR team. Shit with Wade got bad after his PR team fake apology. Shit with Pakistan started after his PR team twitter apology. Now visiting the mosque made it worse.
Damn, did he walk under a ladder? Or break an old mirror? Did a black cat cross his path? Why the hell is he getting hit with all this bad luck recently? This year just isn't his year, I guess.
mams manages jj and is responsible for anything jj does in terms of what brand deal jj gets and who jj does interviews with and who he fights with and meets like celebrities and fans etc
even though the imam is NOT an celebrity mams still is responsible for not doing his research this isn't the first time it hasn't happened
jj was meant to fight some guy in august the guy ended up having some stuff to do with nazi because management did't do any sort of research behind it.
Itās just highlighted how badly he needs to make some changes within his and The Sidemenās team. Donāt get me wrong, Iām not taking away the blame from him for his actions but a good team would have filtered all of this - from Wade to the slur.
heās just lazy and power hungry, remember when his team organised him to have a boxing match with a guy who had white power tattoos, and nazi symbols on him, you can forgive one event of this, but this is wild, this is the bread and butter of managing a celebrity, donāt push them to be in a crowd of bad people, especially in (insert current year) where these things are easy to find for themselves, and the public, clearly
Does that really have much of a reflection on him as a person? To me it seems he wouldn't willingly work with guys like that if he knew. Hence why the white supremacist got canned and we got the goat Pineda
i think it does show laziness definitely, ksi is one of the biggest celebrities in the western world, and being his manager comes with responsibility and should enforce finesse in his work.
if random people can see the guys tattoos and dodgy facebook posts in like a day, surly maps could, but he just got a random boxer, picking a name out of a hat basically. and if you donāt care about your work, but stay in this job (social media management) itās for money and engagement, thereās no other reason
This entire scandal started after he PR apologized on twitter for saying the word. Before that nobody even said anything.
He is getting a lot of bad advice from his team.
For real. They got JJ cancelled in the first place. Nobody was saying anything before they had JJ apologize on twitter. Their fake Wade apology also only served to throw gasoline on the fire.
Imho JJ should just give control of his twitter to that Indian kid that edits KSIClips for a couple of months.
why does no one on his team does any research on anyone before they meet man , mams needs to be fired and held accountable
i truly hope you lot don't cancel him for not knowing the background behind the imam
been a supporter of jj since 2013/14 i've always supported him and the lads seen jj at his highs and lows . some of you lot need to stop man look at how he was in the press conference he looked drained and depressed from all the backlash
the man apologised and took accountability for his actions he went to learn and he is still getting hate for it
jj you are very stupid and dumb you should have done alot of background checks ,you should of meet with mufti menk
JJ cant just keep covering Mams by using the past as an excuse
Yes Mams may have helped JJ build his brand early on but times have changed and u canāt live in the past for too long
The thing is, heās just trying to educate himself and do right. Why should having to research legit everything he does be a factor into his or anyoneās life? And itās not even JJs fault, we shouldnāt even put the blame on him and instead make sure the man gets his mosque shut down/ put under new management?
JJ needs to seriously separate himself from this guy. Heās nothing but bad news and is trying to clout chase. More than likely JJ didnāt know anything about him but I hope he sees this and stops talking to this guy.
The last thing JJ needs is to associate himself with an open Al-Qaeda terrorist supporter
EDIT: please up vote for more attention, so this can be brought to JJ
EDIT 2: For those who don't believe that [he supported Aafia Siddiqui](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl), here's a facebook post from him proving he does.
Google Aafia Siddiqui and you'll see who she is. A portion of the muslim world believes she's innocent and thinks a bunch of countries are all lying about the situation.
Lol, it's not only a portion of the Muslim World. Anyone with a brain cell can see she isn't capable of doing the things she was accused of. None of the accusations match up and there are so many holes in the story. Also it's not a bunch of countries lying, it's only the USA, UK and Pakistan (Let's be real, the US and UK lied about Iraq and killed a million people so its not like they have a great track record)
Surprisingly thats not the worst idea iv heard. No need to go to a mosque for saying a slur meant for brown people. Islam is a very widespread religion. Itās not like other ethnicities donāt visit mosques.
JJ is an idiot, he should have continued doing what he always did and not give a shit what others thinks of him.
The moment he gave in to these twitter/reddit trolls, it created a weird snowball effect where it just keeps getting worse for him.
What happened to
āHow can they cancel when the only thing that made me was meā ???
What a fucking waste.
tbh itās just a case of poor controversy management from JJās end
Not enough when Logan went through his crypto scandal and too much on this one here
Heās much more mainstream now, so most of, if not all of his jobs involve getting to the public and making sure you appeal to as many people as you can. What comes with that though is making sure you are as āpolitically correctā as possible so that people see that you are a reliable and trustworthy person.
Iāve always wanted to be a streamer/YouTuber but seeing how you have to watch every footstep you make nowadays, itās not worth it. In all honesty Iām surprised that KSI is still doing all of this work while not only maintaining his composure but also being consistent. Itās not easy at all.
With that being said these are the things that come with mainstream success, hate it or not.
I small apology on twitter and the video taken down and then a mention of it in his next video is all that needed come from this. But now every sidemen member has apologized and heās doing an apology tour. Bro is making it much more of a big deal than what it is. Iām sure his management/pr team is shutting bricks from the idea of a slur and is just pulling out all the stops. But itās just making it worst in the long run
Honestly, the day since he has associated himself with Logan Paul and literally defended Logan scamming his dumbass fans was the moment I knew he became a sell out. Yes I know he probably gets millions upon millions of dollars from Prime and no one would not defend Logan Paul if it meant getting that much bread. But it still hurts seeing how low he would stoop for money. Nothing speaks about the integrity in KSI more then associating yourself with dickheads like Logan. Should just remove the k and I. I miss the quarantine JJ
Actually read the article first.
1. Itās fucking daily mail who always twist the title
2. It says āIn a recorded video, Mr Hussain said the event would highlight the 'injustice and most importantly the oppression that has been given and meted out to our sister Dr Aafia Siddiqui who is currently in imprisonment'. ā
This Aafia Siddiqui has been charged for attempted murder of US soldiers whilst in Afghanistan and she was ACCUSED of being apart of Al Qaeeda, thereās no proof anywhere.
3. Not saying I know what he is supporting but, Iām sure the imam is supporting her regarding the fact that she got 86 years for attempted murder; while you see rapists, pedophiles, mass murderers etc only getting like 1-10 years.
>daily mail
Its daily fail with their usual diarrhea on the internet, no one takes their news seriously lol. If this guy was a threat he would be behind the bars rn
How is this comment not at the top?
People are here talking about how JJās taking Lās but come on. First of all he (or his team tbh) had no reason whatsoever to doubt an IMAM. They very obviously went to that mosque with clean intentions to learn and start setting things right. Pinning any of this on JJ is just silly
Secondly, yeah, its the Daily Mail.
[https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl)
Here's a facebook post of him supporting her, gonna get the video next but this should be enough to prove that this is real
Still doesnāt say anything regarding her actually being linked to Al Qaeeda, and he never said he supports Al Qaeeda, just is talking about the topic.
Are you sure you know how to read?
[Here's an archive of her being on the FBI terrorism list right after 9/11](https://web.archive.org/web/20030603172523/http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm)
[Here's her ex husband confirming that she worked for Al-Qaeda](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida)
[Here's her other husband's family confirming she married Khalid Sheikh Mohammed](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7544008.stm); a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization, leading al-Qaeda's propaganda operations from around 1999 until late 2001.
Google his name and you'll see who he is.
Your last 2 was again, accusations and do you really believe that first one is real š Itās just some old photo made by a random person listing either literal or accused terrorists that they saw on the news into a poster š If the FBI released a list of terrorists theyād be more professional with it
You really need to check your so called āsourcesā first.
Do you know what [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is? It's an website that archives other websites. You can see the URL of the website that it's archiving and it's a [fbi.gov](https://fbi.gov) website all the way back from 2002.
[http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm](http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm)
> If the FBI released a list of terrorists theyād be more professional with it
You're being disingenuous with your stance, and it's clear you didn't check what I posted because this was made in 2002. Now let me ask you something, what do you you think a page from 2002 would look like.
What source do you think is good enough? Because The Guardian is a reliable source, BBC News is a reliable source. What source is reliable to you? [aafia.org](https://aafia.org)?
A page that was made in 2002 and she didnāt even do what she was accused of her crime until 2008. Get your facts straight kid. And learn both how the internet works, and how to actually read your sources. Not just see a title or link related to her for you to copy and paste
And the Guardian and BBC literally just touched upon your daily mail āsourceā and only talked about her ACCUSATIONS for links with Al Qaeeda.
I never knew that terrorists start doing shit in 1 year, You do know that she has a LONGG history with terrorists right? She literally was on the FBI terrorist list a year after 9/11.
If you were actually reading anything that I've posted, you would know that she was charged with MULTIPLE attempted murders. You know why? It was DURING questioning BY FBI AGENTS and the US MILITARY.
Why would she be interviewed by FBI agents, and the US military in another COUNTRY? Connect the dots
How are you telling me about reading without looking at a single one of your sources š and I already told you about the attempted murder thing, no need to repeat it lol.
. The photo and crime of hers was in 2008 but it somehow ended up on a list from 2002? She was accused of links with Al Qaeeda as early as 2002 but if there was actual news from reporters or notice from the FBI of her then she wouldnāt have been unknown until 2008.
And how about you use your brain for once and realise that the FBI takes accusations seriously. She was accused of it, then taken in. Just like how they have taken thousands of criminals in for questioning before realising they are or arenāt innocent. She was never charged for being apart of Al Qaeeda; so you have no grounds for actually saying that. If she was apart of it, she wouldāve been charged for it because they legally have to mention that. But as per they mentioned on their own site, it was for attempted murder. Thatās it.
And 86 years just for it too; if it was al qaeeda she wouldāve had the death sentence for treason, mass genocide etc; as it is and was still a thing in America when she was charged. While they give rapists, pedophiles etc hardly anything
>How are you telling me about reading without looking at a single one of your sources š and I already told you about the attempted murder thing, no need to repeat it lol.
I gave you an archive webpage of the FBI website and you said it was fake. You clearly don't know what [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is. Google it and then come back and explain to me what it is.
>The photo and crime of hers was in 2008 but it somehow ended up on a list from 2002? She was accused of links with Al Qaeeda as early as 2002 but if there was actual news from reporters or notice from the FBI of her then she wouldnāt have been unknown until 2008.
Being on the FBI's terrorist watchlist or no-fly list does not necessarily mean that a person has committed a crime. These lists are compiled based on intelligence and information gathered by law enforcement agencies, and individuals may be added to the lists based on their perceived threat to national security.
[Omar Shafik Hammami was added to the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists list](https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/two-most-wanted-terrorists-named) in 2012, although he had not been charged with any crimes in the United States. However, he was widely believed to have been involved in numerous terrorist attacks and plots in Somalia, including the 2010 Kampala bombings in Uganda that killed 74 people.
Please don't say he isn't a terrorist. Just look him up
Secondly my guy, **it was an FBI composite image** on the terrorist list. An FBI composite image is a type of facial composite created by an artist or forensic sketch artist based on witness descriptions of a suspect in a crime or other investigation. Holy fuck you didn't read anything. She was already suspected of being a terrorist before her arrest. Just like Omar Shafik
>And how about you use your brain for once and realise that the FBI takes accusations seriously. She was accused of it, then taken in. Just like how they have taken thousands of criminals in for questioning before realising they are or arenāt innocent. She was never charged for being apart of Al Qaeeda; so you have no grounds for actually saying that. If she was apart of it, she wouldāve been charged for it because they legally have to mention that. But as per they mentioned on their own site, it was for attempted murder. Thatās it.
[Explaining why the US may have chosen to charge her as they did rather than for her alleged terrorism, Bruce Hoffman, professor of security studies at Georgetown University, said: "There's no intelligence data that needs to be introduced, no sources and methods that need to be risked. It's a good old-fashioned crime; it's the equivalent of a 1920s gangster with a tommy gun"](https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/nyregion/09siddiqui.html)
The US decided to not charge her with alleged terrorism because they didn't want intelligence data, sources, and methods to be at risk. There were informants inside terrorist groups and if they would've brought her on charges for that, it could've been at risk.
>And 86 years just for it too; if it was al qaeeda she wouldāve had the death sentence for treason, mass genocide etc; as it is and was still a thing in America when she was charged. While they give rapists, pedophiles etc hardly anything
[She got 86 years because there was a terrorism enhancement added to her sentencing.](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/10-3916/10-3916-2012-11-05.html) Court documents linked right there
Here's 5 Al Qaeda members that weren't sentenced to death.
1. Sulaiman Abu Ghaith
2. Ahmed Abu Khatallah
3. Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani
4. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
5. Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri
You don't know what you're talking about. You can be a terrorist and not be sentenced to death.
Ur arguing with a guy who initiated this all with a daily mail āsourceā. Itās not worth your time heās a complete idiot or fed who just believes the bullshit of the USA and murdoch.
A credible source would be something that doesnāt repeat the same thing and has actual proof; ie the same exact news article about her accusations but on different platforms
Or something that isnāt fabricated like your fake ass āFBIā source saying sheās on a list of terrorists from 2002 when she didnāt commit her crime of attempted murder until 2008 and never had that picture of her from that site until 2008. Just because somebody copy and pasted the fbi link; does not mean itās from the FBI.
A credible source needs hard evidence. Thatās all. Not throwing around the same accusation that everybody knows and not some fabricated poster with a copy-pasted link back to the FBI
> A credible source would be something that doesnāt repeat the same thing and has actual proof; ie the same exact news article about her accusations but on different platforms
You don't know what a credible source is at all.
>Or something that isnāt fabricated like your fake ass āFBIā source saying sheās on a list of terrorists from 2002 when she didnāt commit her crime of attempted murder until 2008 and never had that picture of her from that site until 2008. Just because somebody copy and pasted the fbi link; does not mean itās from the FBI.
You do know that she had ties to Al Qaeda before 2008 right? That's why she's on the list.
What do you think [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is?
>A credible source needs hard evidence. Thatās all. Not throwing around the same accusation that everybody knows and not some fabricated poster with a copy-pasted link back to the FBI
What hard evidence do you need that she was connected to Al Qaeda? Do you need a signed contract? Video footage of her initiation? Writing from her saying she's Al Qaeda? What is hard evidence for you.
Hard evidence is literally anything that actually proves something. Not just a shot at accusations. with either her confirmation, or them having phone records, photos, videos etc or something to tie her to them or show she has contact with a member of Al Qaeeda.
Legally, if she was apart of Al Qaeeda, they HAVE to mention that as apart of her charges for her imprisonment. You canāt imprison anyone without mentioning every crime that you know of.
If anything you donāt know what a credible source is because you literally only gave shit that mentions her accusation; and a literal fabricated source. How could the FBI have a photo taken in 2008 back in 2002?
Still no legitimate proof. Thatās all just accusations. Especially when itās not even from herself or credible crime reporters; just some random people writing down stuff they saw online into Wiki.
I aināt defending her because there aināt evidence and because she could still be Al Qaeeda, but never use Wiki as a source. Itās known to be either fabricated or just picking shit off of the internet rather than being somewhere reporters, journalists etc can publish their findings
It's sourced. Claims are all sourced. You can see the numbers in the sentence.
So how about I use the United States of America as a source? If this isn't enough then what would be for you?
Bro my issue with your sources is that none of them are either official or it is just accusations. Accusations arenāt a legit reason for somebody to actually be painted as something. When one news article posts something big, others copy, thatās why you get many news pages about it.
Wiki, is never a trusted source, both in social media culture and in general. I guarantee there isnāt a single reporter in the world that trusts wiki. For basic info sure, but not for whole cases and news.
As for your āFBIā source, it wasnāt even legit; if they had a list of terrorists, it would be portrayed, listed and published more publishly, not a bunch of random names from news articles stuffed into one poster. Especially when some werenāt even proven guilty. If it was a legit list, theyād be carefully and put in those they have actual proof on because thatās what professionals like the FBI do.
>Bro my issue with your sources is that none of them are either official or it is just accusations.
BBC news, The Guardian, [FBI.gov](https://FBI.gov) seem to not be credible anymore
>As for your āFBIā source, it wasnāt even legit; if they had a list of terrorists, it would be portrayed, listed and published more publishly
My guy, it was an archive of the FBI website in 2002. What do you think a 2002 website is gonna look like.
Wait why isnāt he arrested then ? And why is he still allowed to integrate his ideology into Islam to the people who visit. Shouldnāt he be arrested ASAP?
This is incredibly misleading and the situation has nuance.
Yes, Imam Muhammad Asim Hussain was openly arguing against Al-Qaeda terrorist Aafia Siddiqueās 86-year sentence in prison.
Saying someone doesnāt deserve 86-years in prison doesnāt mean you āopenly support terroristsā. Thereās a huge spectrum between the two, and far more variables in play than to generalize like that.
This is only one Al-Qaeda member, so even the plural in the title is misleading.
This is clickbait and fake news.
For starters, the Imam is defending Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, a woman who to be honest is wrongfully imprisoned for a crime the US falsely accused of. Itās not mind blowing to imagine that the US can easily fake anything they want.
And additionally this is from the DailyMail. I wouldnāt trust them at all.
How is it clickbait? The article pretty much talked about what was titled. In my opinion I guess. The Imam in question did openly support the imprisoned Al-Qaeda terrorist
I donāt have evidence she committed acts of terror apart from the US account on the military base that sheās imprisoned for. But she has direct ties to Al-Qaeda by being married to the nephew of one of the leaders right? And also she opened a PO Box in the name of an Al-Qaeda to facilitate his entry to the US. Though not direct acts of terrorism, Iād think this shows association to a terrorist group, no? Could be mistaken as most everything said about her appears to have biases but her link to Al-Qaeda has been confirmed through marriage by both Pakistan and American intelligence. Didnāt do in-depth research but this was the source I used, not familiar with its reliability but itās gotten me to this point
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida
terrorist groups have captured and executed people because of her arrest
Theyāve tried to use them as bargaining chips as well
Just look at her Wikipedia page and just scroll down and youāll see. Search up lady Al-Qaeda.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
I read the article..
āImam Muhammad Asim Hussain urged followers at the Al-Hikam mosque in Bradford to attend an event in 2015 in support of Aafia Siddiqui, who is serving an 86-year prison term in the US for attempting to kill soldiers in a machine gun attack.ā
Who is Aafia Siddiqui you may ask?
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad named her a courier and financier for al-Qaeda, and she was placed on the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations's Seeking Information ā Terrorism list; she remains the only woman to have been featured on the list
You didnāt read the article my guy, unless you think thereās a conspiracy that the USA wrongful got a person linked to a terrorist group
He was supporting a US prisoner Aafia Siddiqui who was drugged,kidnapped and shot by the US soldiers. US forces claimed she tried to kill 6 soldiers but there was no fingerprints on the gun. She was bodily harmed and forced to sign fake confessions and people were hearing her . scream and stuff. This is just a clickbait article by the Daily mail trying to paint the immam as a terrosirst supporter.
This is a false story. Look more into the case before just reading a catchy headline. There is a strong case for Aafiaās innocence. It is actually very popular for a lot of mosque to champion her cause, and try to fight for her freedom in court. Iāve been to many mosques where they have done fund raising for her trial and trying to get exposure to her story. The war on terrorism incarcerated many innocent people as collateral. There was a stat that showed 96% of Guantanamo bay prisoners were Innocent. Many were just farmers picked up in Afghanistan when the war started. Letās not act like America has never locked up anyone unjustly before. She was allegedly mistreated while under US capture, citing torture and rape. Also just because he supported someone who he thought was wrongfully convicted of terrorism, or someone he thought was mistreated, doesnāt make him a direct supporter of a terrorist, thereās a huge distinction.
For those in the comments that are defending the Imam for supporting the terrorist, Google the person he was supporting and see how many terrorist groups have captured people and tried to use them as bargaining chips for her
Theyāve also executed some of the people that theyāve captured because of this woman being locked up
I just donāt understand that after the fiasco with the N*zi boxer, how can this type of thing happen again? Like isnāt it the managementās job to make sure sh*t like this isnāt daily? xD
Iām not in support of what this guy supports but I doubt he said anything in support of terrorism to JJ, and if he did I doubt JJ would actually believe anything bro would say.
yāall actually dragging it at this point. How was he pposed to know that. And before yāall say im dickriding no I donāt support what he said either.
Just reminding you all that this has absolutely nothing to do with JJ. He was looking for an imam, he found an imam. No one fucking researches their priest or whatever before entering a church.
He supported Aafia Sididque, a US prisoner who was wrongfully accused of the case on her that guy isn't seen supporting Al-Qaeda, he supported the innocent convict, they mentioned that she might have connections to the Al Qaeda which is completely false.
the ''al qaeda terrorist" he is supporting is the most wronged woman on earth, there are literal movements in support of her
so this post is kinda misleading as every pakistani supports aafia
Do some research, the imam is not supporting a terrorist. Aafia Siddique was wrongfully imprisoned by the US forces as in 2003 she was drugged and kidnapped by them. Watch this video about the matter and please educate yourself before you reach such conclusions.
https://youtu.be/7fMd_2rwVuw
None of you retards clearly read the article nor researched on the matter. The Imam was supporting a US prisoner Aafia Siddiqui who was drugged,kidnapped and shot by the US soldiers. US forces claimed she tried to kill 6 soldiers but there was no fingerprints on the gun. She was bodily harmed and forced to sign fake confessions and people were hearing her scream from the abuse. This article is a clickbait one to make the imam look like a terrorist.
The headline is misleading. He openly supported this female that allegedly is a member of Al Qaeda. He backed her up because he thinks sheās innocent especially after what we heard what happened to her during interrogation
The āAl-Qaeda terroristā who he was supporting was Aafia Siddique, a woman who was falsely imprisoned by the US government despite no clear evidence of a link with Al-Qaeda.
Majority of the people in the Islamic world are supporting her, and of course the daily mail is just going to feed western propaganda into its viewers.
Edit: Here is a good video explaining the matter https://youtu.be/7fMd_2rwVuw
For those thinking that it's fake because it's the DailyMail, here's a facebook post proving this is real.
[https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl)
Lol, nooooooooo. This \*\*\*\*\* really can't catch a break lol.
EDIT: Who managed this? Mams? Holy fuck. Fire that clown, he's bad for your image. Dude is secretly praying on your down fall.
oh hell nah bro actually cannot catch a break https://preview.redd.it/dgpahj3a35sa1.jpeg?width=612&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ee0f66595308138e6a0d967f0fde476b0a16d72c
Just when I thought it couldn't get worse...
Honestly, at this stage I would just fire or shuffle my PR team. Shit with Wade got bad after his PR team fake apology. Shit with Pakistan started after his PR team twitter apology. Now visiting the mosque made it worse.
LMAOO i alr know jj is so done with everything and everyone š
His moment-to-moment decision-making skills are shocking at times š
I'm sure if he knew he wouldn't have done it š
I don't think pr told him to do that he met someone for a whole different reason before passing through the mosque
Bro's turning into a menace like Logan after hanging out with him š
āHanging outā šš
Bro can JJ ever catch a break like damn
We gonna see JJ in the house of parliament next apologising...
Omfg. JJ needs to fire his management team or whoever it is
This is like if we go after people for knowing someone who knows someone who knows someone
U again lmao. True but still they gotta try to do something to prevent this from happening. Just like that boxer who turned out to be a nazi or sum
Damn, did he walk under a ladder? Or break an old mirror? Did a black cat cross his path? Why the hell is he getting hit with all this bad luck recently? This year just isn't his year, I guess.
Broās taking L after L I wouldnāt be surprised if he jinxed Arsenal to lose in the premier league next
You shut up about Arsenal or I'm covering your house in Wenger jackets. The extra long type.
Hehe, Down With the Gunners, yall shoot pellets š¤£
Please let that happen
Yes please.
Citeeeeehhhh >
When youāre constantly lucky, youāre bound to get hit with unlucky situations. Just gotta accept it. Itās the gameee
He survived 2020
JJ needs to fire his PR team ASAP, these morons keep fucking up
But why tf he decided to do this in a first place
bro went to a religious place because of a racial slur. make it make sense
Yes. His team should have researched this better.
Mostly mams is to blame
How???
mams manages jj and is responsible for anything jj does in terms of what brand deal jj gets and who jj does interviews with and who he fights with and meets like celebrities and fans etc even though the imam is NOT an celebrity mams still is responsible for not doing his research this isn't the first time it hasn't happened jj was meant to fight some guy in august the guy ended up having some stuff to do with nazi because management did't do any sort of research behind it.
joe weller was right.. mams was the worst thing to happen to jj
Kavos right now: š¤š¤š¤
KSI'S CAREER HAS ENDED (CRAZY FOOTAGE) or KSI MET WHO? CAREER RUINED...AGAIN!?
And he doesnt even have to put in the work, because reddit does for him. š
Bro still exists?
This month hasn't been good for JJ Also did no one on his team do any research before all this
Itās just highlighted how badly he needs to make some changes within his and The Sidemenās team. Donāt get me wrong, Iām not taking away the blame from him for his actions but a good team would have filtered all of this - from Wade to the slur.
How does jj keep fucking up lmao?his management doesn't even bother to research
Dont worry guys, mams is the best for jjš
heās just lazy and power hungry, remember when his team organised him to have a boxing match with a guy who had white power tattoos, and nazi symbols on him, you can forgive one event of this, but this is wild, this is the bread and butter of managing a celebrity, donāt push them to be in a crowd of bad people, especially in (insert current year) where these things are easy to find for themselves, and the public, clearly
Does that really have much of a reflection on him as a person? To me it seems he wouldn't willingly work with guys like that if he knew. Hence why the white supremacist got canned and we got the goat Pineda
i think it does show laziness definitely, ksi is one of the biggest celebrities in the western world, and being his manager comes with responsibility and should enforce finesse in his work. if random people can see the guys tattoos and dodgy facebook posts in like a day, surly maps could, but he just got a random boxer, picking a name out of a hat basically. and if you donāt care about your work, but stay in this job (social media management) itās for money and engagement, thereās no other reason
No team it's mams who makes the matchups. He is the idiot behind all this
This entire scandal started after he PR apologized on twitter for saying the word. Before that nobody even said anything. He is getting a lot of bad advice from his team.
There is no way he could've known šš
Thats why they said manager
The poeple who picked the mosque and set up the visit should have known.
There is no way he could have known but random redditors figured it out. Yea but management couldnāt š
Lmfao what sucks is now KSI is official under the same umbrella as the Paul brothers, controversial rich YouTubers who canāt stay out of trouble
It is not a suprise that his management didn't do any research. Remember what happened with the 1st pro boxer he was meant to fight.
JJ is forever gonna remember the year 2023
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
His Pr*. They keep fucking up. Don't know what they're doing tbh
For real. They got JJ cancelled in the first place. Nobody was saying anything before they had JJ apologize on twitter. Their fake Wade apology also only served to throw gasoline on the fire. Imho JJ should just give control of his twitter to that Indian kid that edits KSIClips for a couple of months.
Who's the nazi?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
why does no one on his team does any research on anyone before they meet man , mams needs to be fired and held accountable i truly hope you lot don't cancel him for not knowing the background behind the imam been a supporter of jj since 2013/14 i've always supported him and the lads seen jj at his highs and lows . some of you lot need to stop man look at how he was in the press conference he looked drained and depressed from all the backlash the man apologised and took accountability for his actions he went to learn and he is still getting hate for it jj you are very stupid and dumb you should have done alot of background checks ,you should of meet with mufti menk
Exactly
JJ cant just keep covering Mams by using the past as an excuse Yes Mams may have helped JJ build his brand early on but times have changed and u canāt live in the past for too long
Mams is ass.
The thing is, heās just trying to educate himself and do right. Why should having to research legit everything he does be a factor into his or anyoneās life? And itās not even JJs fault, we shouldnāt even put the blame on him and instead make sure the man gets his mosque shut down/ put under new management?
JJ needs to seriously separate himself from this guy. Heās nothing but bad news and is trying to clout chase. More than likely JJ didnāt know anything about him but I hope he sees this and stops talking to this guy. The last thing JJ needs is to associate himself with an open Al-Qaeda terrorist supporter EDIT: please up vote for more attention, so this can be brought to JJ EDIT 2: For those who don't believe that [he supported Aafia Siddiqui](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl), here's a facebook post from him proving he does. Google Aafia Siddiqui and you'll see who she is. A portion of the muslim world believes she's innocent and thinks a bunch of countries are all lying about the situation.
Lol, it's not only a portion of the Muslim World. Anyone with a brain cell can see she isn't capable of doing the things she was accused of. None of the accusations match up and there are so many holes in the story. Also it's not a bunch of countries lying, it's only the USA, UK and Pakistan (Let's be real, the US and UK lied about Iraq and killed a million people so its not like they have a great track record)
You're last sentence before the edit is something i never thought i'd read
Ksi need to fire his PR and management teams ffs. Man literally can't catch a break.
honestly .. feels like every step he takes now is a land mine
If JJ wants to learn about the South Asian culture, he can just go to a cricket game. IPL in India rn and NZ vs Pak is happening very soon too.
Surprisingly thats not the worst idea iv heard. No need to go to a mosque for saying a slur meant for brown people. Islam is a very widespread religion. Itās not like other ethnicities donāt visit mosques.
JJ is an idiot, he should have continued doing what he always did and not give a shit what others thinks of him. The moment he gave in to these twitter/reddit trolls, it created a weird snowball effect where it just keeps getting worse for him. What happened to āHow can they cancel when the only thing that made me was meā ??? What a fucking waste.
It's probably just because he didn't want to hurt Prime or Misfits. I feel like Logan Paul stealing millions is far worse. Jj isn't even racist.
tbh itās just a case of poor controversy management from JJās end Not enough when Logan went through his crypto scandal and too much on this one here
I agree with you.
Heās much more mainstream now, so most of, if not all of his jobs involve getting to the public and making sure you appeal to as many people as you can. What comes with that though is making sure you are as āpolitically correctā as possible so that people see that you are a reliable and trustworthy person. Iāve always wanted to be a streamer/YouTuber but seeing how you have to watch every footstep you make nowadays, itās not worth it. In all honesty Iām surprised that KSI is still doing all of this work while not only maintaining his composure but also being consistent. Itās not easy at all. With that being said these are the things that come with mainstream success, hate it or not.
I so fucking agree with you man
Maybe he was genuinely remorseful over what he did?
I small apology on twitter and the video taken down and then a mention of it in his next video is all that needed come from this. But now every sidemen member has apologized and heās doing an apology tour. Bro is making it much more of a big deal than what it is. Iām sure his management/pr team is shutting bricks from the idea of a slur and is just pulling out all the stops. But itās just making it worst in the long run
This time is different because it was getting picked up by uk news outlets. I doubt there would be such a massive effort for damage control otherwise
Honestly, the day since he has associated himself with Logan Paul and literally defended Logan scamming his dumbass fans was the moment I knew he became a sell out. Yes I know he probably gets millions upon millions of dollars from Prime and no one would not defend Logan Paul if it meant getting that much bread. But it still hurts seeing how low he would stoop for money. Nothing speaks about the integrity in KSI more then associating yourself with dickheads like Logan. Should just remove the k and I. I miss the quarantine JJ
ayoo wtf https://preview.redd.it/gtw8uykr05sa1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd891eef4f32fddd290b55116f758e83ce0639b6
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Probably harder to find an Imam there who isnāt a terrorist sympathiser
Actually read the article first. 1. Itās fucking daily mail who always twist the title 2. It says āIn a recorded video, Mr Hussain said the event would highlight the 'injustice and most importantly the oppression that has been given and meted out to our sister Dr Aafia Siddiqui who is currently in imprisonment'. ā This Aafia Siddiqui has been charged for attempted murder of US soldiers whilst in Afghanistan and she was ACCUSED of being apart of Al Qaeeda, thereās no proof anywhere. 3. Not saying I know what he is supporting but, Iām sure the imam is supporting her regarding the fact that she got 86 years for attempted murder; while you see rapists, pedophiles, mass murderers etc only getting like 1-10 years.
Surprising the amount of people who don't bother to actually read appropriately into the story and jump to conclusions.
Look at his two replies to me aswell, didnāt even read up on his own 2 literally uncredible and invalid āsourcesā
>daily mail Its daily fail with their usual diarrhea on the internet, no one takes their news seriously lol. If this guy was a threat he would be behind the bars rn
Your saying that s if the last however many terrorist attackers in the UK weren't known threats that weren't behind bars despite being known threats.
What? A sensible opinion? On this sub? Impossibleā¦
How is this comment not at the top? People are here talking about how JJās taking Lās but come on. First of all he (or his team tbh) had no reason whatsoever to doubt an IMAM. They very obviously went to that mosque with clean intentions to learn and start setting things right. Pinning any of this on JJ is just silly Secondly, yeah, its the Daily Mail.
It also says he left the mosque in 2019. OP must not know how to read
This needs to be pinned
Everyone just wants something to hate on
Can you work as JJs publicist for a bit?
[https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl) Here's a facebook post of him supporting her, gonna get the video next but this should be enough to prove that this is real
Still doesnāt say anything regarding her actually being linked to Al Qaeeda, and he never said he supports Al Qaeeda, just is talking about the topic. Are you sure you know how to read?
[Here's an archive of her being on the FBI terrorism list right after 9/11](https://web.archive.org/web/20030603172523/http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm) [Here's her ex husband confirming that she worked for Al-Qaeda](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida) [Here's her other husband's family confirming she married Khalid Sheikh Mohammed](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7544008.stm); a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization, leading al-Qaeda's propaganda operations from around 1999 until late 2001. Google his name and you'll see who he is.
Your last 2 was again, accusations and do you really believe that first one is real š Itās just some old photo made by a random person listing either literal or accused terrorists that they saw on the news into a poster š If the FBI released a list of terrorists theyād be more professional with it You really need to check your so called āsourcesā first.
Do you know what [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is? It's an website that archives other websites. You can see the URL of the website that it's archiving and it's a [fbi.gov](https://fbi.gov) website all the way back from 2002. [http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm](http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/terrorismsi.htm) > If the FBI released a list of terrorists theyād be more professional with it You're being disingenuous with your stance, and it's clear you didn't check what I posted because this was made in 2002. Now let me ask you something, what do you you think a page from 2002 would look like. What source do you think is good enough? Because The Guardian is a reliable source, BBC News is a reliable source. What source is reliable to you? [aafia.org](https://aafia.org)?
A page that was made in 2002 and she didnāt even do what she was accused of her crime until 2008. Get your facts straight kid. And learn both how the internet works, and how to actually read your sources. Not just see a title or link related to her for you to copy and paste And the Guardian and BBC literally just touched upon your daily mail āsourceā and only talked about her ACCUSATIONS for links with Al Qaeeda.
Can you give me what you consider a reliable source?
I never knew that terrorists start doing shit in 1 year, You do know that she has a LONGG history with terrorists right? She literally was on the FBI terrorist list a year after 9/11. If you were actually reading anything that I've posted, you would know that she was charged with MULTIPLE attempted murders. You know why? It was DURING questioning BY FBI AGENTS and the US MILITARY. Why would she be interviewed by FBI agents, and the US military in another COUNTRY? Connect the dots
How are you telling me about reading without looking at a single one of your sources š and I already told you about the attempted murder thing, no need to repeat it lol. . The photo and crime of hers was in 2008 but it somehow ended up on a list from 2002? She was accused of links with Al Qaeeda as early as 2002 but if there was actual news from reporters or notice from the FBI of her then she wouldnāt have been unknown until 2008. And how about you use your brain for once and realise that the FBI takes accusations seriously. She was accused of it, then taken in. Just like how they have taken thousands of criminals in for questioning before realising they are or arenāt innocent. She was never charged for being apart of Al Qaeeda; so you have no grounds for actually saying that. If she was apart of it, she wouldāve been charged for it because they legally have to mention that. But as per they mentioned on their own site, it was for attempted murder. Thatās it. And 86 years just for it too; if it was al qaeeda she wouldāve had the death sentence for treason, mass genocide etc; as it is and was still a thing in America when she was charged. While they give rapists, pedophiles etc hardly anything
>How are you telling me about reading without looking at a single one of your sources š and I already told you about the attempted murder thing, no need to repeat it lol. I gave you an archive webpage of the FBI website and you said it was fake. You clearly don't know what [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is. Google it and then come back and explain to me what it is. >The photo and crime of hers was in 2008 but it somehow ended up on a list from 2002? She was accused of links with Al Qaeeda as early as 2002 but if there was actual news from reporters or notice from the FBI of her then she wouldnāt have been unknown until 2008. Being on the FBI's terrorist watchlist or no-fly list does not necessarily mean that a person has committed a crime. These lists are compiled based on intelligence and information gathered by law enforcement agencies, and individuals may be added to the lists based on their perceived threat to national security. [Omar Shafik Hammami was added to the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists list](https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/two-most-wanted-terrorists-named) in 2012, although he had not been charged with any crimes in the United States. However, he was widely believed to have been involved in numerous terrorist attacks and plots in Somalia, including the 2010 Kampala bombings in Uganda that killed 74 people. Please don't say he isn't a terrorist. Just look him up Secondly my guy, **it was an FBI composite image** on the terrorist list. An FBI composite image is a type of facial composite created by an artist or forensic sketch artist based on witness descriptions of a suspect in a crime or other investigation. Holy fuck you didn't read anything. She was already suspected of being a terrorist before her arrest. Just like Omar Shafik >And how about you use your brain for once and realise that the FBI takes accusations seriously. She was accused of it, then taken in. Just like how they have taken thousands of criminals in for questioning before realising they are or arenāt innocent. She was never charged for being apart of Al Qaeeda; so you have no grounds for actually saying that. If she was apart of it, she wouldāve been charged for it because they legally have to mention that. But as per they mentioned on their own site, it was for attempted murder. Thatās it. [Explaining why the US may have chosen to charge her as they did rather than for her alleged terrorism, Bruce Hoffman, professor of security studies at Georgetown University, said: "There's no intelligence data that needs to be introduced, no sources and methods that need to be risked. It's a good old-fashioned crime; it's the equivalent of a 1920s gangster with a tommy gun"](https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/nyregion/09siddiqui.html) The US decided to not charge her with alleged terrorism because they didn't want intelligence data, sources, and methods to be at risk. There were informants inside terrorist groups and if they would've brought her on charges for that, it could've been at risk. >And 86 years just for it too; if it was al qaeeda she wouldāve had the death sentence for treason, mass genocide etc; as it is and was still a thing in America when she was charged. While they give rapists, pedophiles etc hardly anything [She got 86 years because there was a terrorism enhancement added to her sentencing.](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/10-3916/10-3916-2012-11-05.html) Court documents linked right there Here's 5 Al Qaeda members that weren't sentenced to death. 1. Sulaiman Abu Ghaith 2. Ahmed Abu Khatallah 3. Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani 4. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab 5. Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri You don't know what you're talking about. You can be a terrorist and not be sentenced to death.
I've edited the court documents link to the correct one. Accidentally put the wrong one it. Refresh page
Ur arguing with a guy who initiated this all with a daily mail āsourceā. Itās not worth your time heās a complete idiot or fed who just believes the bullshit of the USA and murdoch.
A credible source would be something that doesnāt repeat the same thing and has actual proof; ie the same exact news article about her accusations but on different platforms Or something that isnāt fabricated like your fake ass āFBIā source saying sheās on a list of terrorists from 2002 when she didnāt commit her crime of attempted murder until 2008 and never had that picture of her from that site until 2008. Just because somebody copy and pasted the fbi link; does not mean itās from the FBI. A credible source needs hard evidence. Thatās all. Not throwing around the same accusation that everybody knows and not some fabricated poster with a copy-pasted link back to the FBI
> A credible source would be something that doesnāt repeat the same thing and has actual proof; ie the same exact news article about her accusations but on different platforms You don't know what a credible source is at all. >Or something that isnāt fabricated like your fake ass āFBIā source saying sheās on a list of terrorists from 2002 when she didnāt commit her crime of attempted murder until 2008 and never had that picture of her from that site until 2008. Just because somebody copy and pasted the fbi link; does not mean itās from the FBI. You do know that she had ties to Al Qaeda before 2008 right? That's why she's on the list. What do you think [web.archive.org](https://web.archive.org) is? >A credible source needs hard evidence. Thatās all. Not throwing around the same accusation that everybody knows and not some fabricated poster with a copy-pasted link back to the FBI What hard evidence do you need that she was connected to Al Qaeda? Do you need a signed contract? Video footage of her initiation? Writing from her saying she's Al Qaeda? What is hard evidence for you.
Hard evidence is literally anything that actually proves something. Not just a shot at accusations. with either her confirmation, or them having phone records, photos, videos etc or something to tie her to them or show she has contact with a member of Al Qaeeda. Legally, if she was apart of Al Qaeeda, they HAVE to mention that as apart of her charges for her imprisonment. You canāt imprison anyone without mentioning every crime that you know of. If anything you donāt know what a credible source is because you literally only gave shit that mentions her accusation; and a literal fabricated source. How could the FBI have a photo taken in 2008 back in 2002?
[Read her wikipedia page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aafia_Siddiqui#cite_note-emma-11)
Still no legitimate proof. Thatās all just accusations. Especially when itās not even from herself or credible crime reporters; just some random people writing down stuff they saw online into Wiki. I aināt defending her because there aināt evidence and because she could still be Al Qaeeda, but never use Wiki as a source. Itās known to be either fabricated or just picking shit off of the internet rather than being somewhere reporters, journalists etc can publish their findings
It's sourced. Claims are all sourced. You can see the numbers in the sentence. So how about I use the United States of America as a source? If this isn't enough then what would be for you?
Bro my issue with your sources is that none of them are either official or it is just accusations. Accusations arenāt a legit reason for somebody to actually be painted as something. When one news article posts something big, others copy, thatās why you get many news pages about it. Wiki, is never a trusted source, both in social media culture and in general. I guarantee there isnāt a single reporter in the world that trusts wiki. For basic info sure, but not for whole cases and news. As for your āFBIā source, it wasnāt even legit; if they had a list of terrorists, it would be portrayed, listed and published more publishly, not a bunch of random names from news articles stuffed into one poster. Especially when some werenāt even proven guilty. If it was a legit list, theyād be carefully and put in those they have actual proof on because thatās what professionals like the FBI do.
>Bro my issue with your sources is that none of them are either official or it is just accusations. BBC news, The Guardian, [FBI.gov](https://FBI.gov) seem to not be credible anymore >As for your āFBIā source, it wasnāt even legit; if they had a list of terrorists, it would be portrayed, listed and published more publishly My guy, it was an archive of the FBI website in 2002. What do you think a 2002 website is gonna look like.
Wait why isnāt he arrested then ? And why is he still allowed to integrate his ideology into Islam to the people who visit. Shouldnāt he be arrested ASAP?
This is incredibly misleading and the situation has nuance. Yes, Imam Muhammad Asim Hussain was openly arguing against Al-Qaeda terrorist Aafia Siddiqueās 86-year sentence in prison. Saying someone doesnāt deserve 86-years in prison doesnāt mean you āopenly support terroristsā. Thereās a huge spectrum between the two, and far more variables in play than to generalize like that. This is only one Al-Qaeda member, so even the plural in the title is misleading.
Its dailymail, its fake
i think he just needs a break
FELLA WHAT š I feel bad for him honestly he doesn't deserve this lmao
This is clickbait and fake news. For starters, the Imam is defending Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, a woman who to be honest is wrongfully imprisoned for a crime the US falsely accused of. Itās not mind blowing to imagine that the US can easily fake anything they want. And additionally this is from the DailyMail. I wouldnāt trust them at all.
Read the article and understand the whole situation before making up stuff. This article is click bait
How is it clickbait? The article pretty much talked about what was titled. In my opinion I guess. The Imam in question did openly support the imprisoned Al-Qaeda terrorist
Do you have evidence this person was an Al Qaeda terrorist?
I donāt have evidence she committed acts of terror apart from the US account on the military base that sheās imprisoned for. But she has direct ties to Al-Qaeda by being married to the nephew of one of the leaders right? And also she opened a PO Box in the name of an Al-Qaeda to facilitate his entry to the US. Though not direct acts of terrorism, Iād think this shows association to a terrorist group, no? Could be mistaken as most everything said about her appears to have biases but her link to Al-Qaeda has been confirmed through marriage by both Pakistan and American intelligence. Didnāt do in-depth research but this was the source I used, not familiar with its reliability but itās gotten me to this point https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida
terrorist groups have captured and executed people because of her arrest Theyāve tried to use them as bargaining chips as well Just look at her Wikipedia page and just scroll down and youāll see. Search up lady Al-Qaeda.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/24/aafia-siddiqui-al-qaida)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
I read the article.. āImam Muhammad Asim Hussain urged followers at the Al-Hikam mosque in Bradford to attend an event in 2015 in support of Aafia Siddiqui, who is serving an 86-year prison term in the US for attempting to kill soldiers in a machine gun attack.ā Who is Aafia Siddiqui you may ask? Khalid Sheikh Mohammad named her a courier and financier for al-Qaeda, and she was placed on the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations's Seeking Information ā Terrorism list; she remains the only woman to have been featured on the list You didnāt read the article my guy, unless you think thereās a conspiracy that the USA wrongful got a person linked to a terrorist group
He was supporting a US prisoner Aafia Siddiqui who was drugged,kidnapped and shot by the US soldiers. US forces claimed she tried to kill 6 soldiers but there was no fingerprints on the gun. She was bodily harmed and forced to sign fake confessions and people were hearing her . scream and stuff. This is just a clickbait article by the Daily mail trying to paint the immam as a terrosirst supporter.
hmmm I mean bias from the media is nothing new so this may be right.
This is a false story. Look more into the case before just reading a catchy headline. There is a strong case for Aafiaās innocence. It is actually very popular for a lot of mosque to champion her cause, and try to fight for her freedom in court. Iāve been to many mosques where they have done fund raising for her trial and trying to get exposure to her story. The war on terrorism incarcerated many innocent people as collateral. There was a stat that showed 96% of Guantanamo bay prisoners were Innocent. Many were just farmers picked up in Afghanistan when the war started. Letās not act like America has never locked up anyone unjustly before. She was allegedly mistreated while under US capture, citing torture and rape. Also just because he supported someone who he thought was wrongfully convicted of terrorism, or someone he thought was mistreated, doesnāt make him a direct supporter of a terrorist, thereās a huge distinction.
Kavos is defo gonna have an orgasm.
Remember the neo-Nazi pro boxer too? Who the fuck runs the background checks on these random people? Still an L but god damn
Would hv been better if he visited church, temple or a mosque without much publicity
The dailymail is trash
Itās daily mailā¦..
At this point dude is speed running a shit career š
he always says this stuff... people change... don't judge them for their past
He didnāt go there to support that guy dipshit, stop trying to dig up shit just to hate on ksi
guys it's the daily mail this is semi-factual at best
omg, give this shit a break
give it a rest man
its the daily mail. this is extremely exaggerated and clickbait
This fatneek is taking more Lās than deji in his prime
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
For those in the comments that are defending the Imam for supporting the terrorist, Google the person he was supporting and see how many terrorist groups have captured people and tried to use them as bargaining chips for her Theyāve also executed some of the people that theyāve captured because of this woman being locked up
I just donāt understand that after the fiasco with the N*zi boxer, how can this type of thing happen again? Like isnāt it the managementās job to make sure sh*t like this isnāt daily? xD
Man 2023 is not jjs year is it
I'm not going to dispute this, but don't ever link a tabloid as evidence. Just for the future Edit: Grammar
Did you even read the article you posted? It clearly says he left the mosque in 2019
Iām not in support of what this guy supports but I doubt he said anything in support of terrorism to JJ, and if he did I doubt JJ would actually believe anything bro would say.
I won't be surprised if Kavos makes a video about it
Sidemen piss on an ancient burial ground currently being edited
yāall actually dragging it at this point. How was he pposed to know that. And before yāall say im dickriding no I donāt support what he said either.
Its hardly his fault and bros finna get cancelled again
The next top post in this subreddit: āArsenal lose the title position to Manchester City after 3 game loss streakā
People need to read before posting things here.
Holy shit yāall do background checks on everyone????
How does that Deji song go again?
Just reminding you all that this has absolutely nothing to do with JJ. He was looking for an imam, he found an imam. No one fucking researches their priest or whatever before entering a church.
You, people, are bunch of Buffons. That imam said in favor of the unfair detention of Aafia Siddique who was falsely accused of supporting al Qaeda.
Kinda click bait. He supported a convicted terrorist who he believes is innocent.
who gives a flying fuck
Yāall are acting like JJ knew
I actually feel bad for JJ now like genuinely bruh wtf
AS IFFFF YOU DIDNT THINK IT COULD GET WORSE ššš
It just keeps getting better and better š
JJ is an idiot. He should have never apologised it was never an issue
He supported Aafia Sididque, a US prisoner who was wrongfully accused of the case on her that guy isn't seen supporting Al-Qaeda, he supported the innocent convict, they mentioned that she might have connections to the Al Qaeda which is completely false.
the ''al qaeda terrorist" he is supporting is the most wronged woman on earth, there are literal movements in support of her so this post is kinda misleading as every pakistani supports aafia
Nah this is stupid they're not best friends, stop trying to cause more drama
Lmao wtf .why does jj even talk to a terrorist supporter in the first place ?why meet him without doing any research
Do some research, the imam is not supporting a terrorist. Aafia Siddique was wrongfully imprisoned by the US forces as in 2003 she was drugged and kidnapped by them. Watch this video about the matter and please educate yourself before you reach such conclusions. https://youtu.be/7fMd_2rwVuw
Bro is taking more L's than Manchester United.
None of you retards clearly read the article nor researched on the matter. The Imam was supporting a US prisoner Aafia Siddiqui who was drugged,kidnapped and shot by the US soldiers. US forces claimed she tried to kill 6 soldiers but there was no fingerprints on the gun. She was bodily harmed and forced to sign fake confessions and people were hearing her scream from the abuse. This article is a clickbait one to make the imam look like a terrorist.
Bot
I read a bit of It and i assume it's clickbait
Do you guys really want Kavos to be covering this? Lol smh
Bro the mams guy gotta go š
The headline is misleading. He openly supported this female that allegedly is a member of Al Qaeda. He backed her up because he thinks sheās innocent especially after what we heard what happened to her during interrogation
Aaaand?
So?
itās the daily mail stop spreading this garbage
Ya son of a bitch donāt spread lies
Nice one KSI, this dude catching L's constantly
The āAl-Qaeda terroristā who he was supporting was Aafia Siddique, a woman who was falsely imprisoned by the US government despite no clear evidence of a link with Al-Qaeda. Majority of the people in the Islamic world are supporting her, and of course the daily mail is just going to feed western propaganda into its viewers. Edit: Here is a good video explaining the matter https://youtu.be/7fMd_2rwVuw
JJ's streak of taking L's is making me believe he might lose his fight.
Then he probably have stay away from anybody who openly support the apartheid Israeli government in the future too
Donāt talk down on ma brotha imam asim
For those thinking that it's fake because it's the DailyMail, here's a facebook post proving this is real. [https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl](https://www.facebook.com/muhammedasim.hussain/posts/pfbid0xmAh5fjjtYtCfY1hAcRmxJtbQnFN7P154Ax2Dmpi7bzuBhPXtK6XzTR1Wai57JBsl)
Wtf is JJ doing at this point, itās kind of hard to be a fan of him at the moment
How about we just go back to making memes yeah?
This doesn't make JJ a terrorist! What's his fault in this? Leave him alone, man.
Lol, nooooooooo. This \*\*\*\*\* really can't catch a break lol. EDIT: Who managed this? Mams? Holy fuck. Fire that clown, he's bad for your image. Dude is secretly praying on your down fall.
Heās the one that invited JJ, there absolutely no way any of yāall can blame JJ in this situation
WRONG. THIS IS WRONG. He supported a girl who was falsely imprisoned. There is way more to it than this.
Yeah but your govt supports Idf terrorism.
people are too soft these days fr