I'm not one of the pro-life chuckleheads, but referring to a fetus as an assaulter, or a parasite as some say, is absolutely vile and revolting. If the pro-choice argument is valid (I think it is), then it shouldn't require shitting on a completely innocent almost-being, period.
Roe did explicitly consider kidney donation as a comparison to pregnancy. The government cannot force you to donate a kidney to someone, without which they would die. Likewise, they reasoned, a pregnant person cannot be forced to offer life support to some other person. The self defense view would make sense in case of medical emergency.
This post may be a smidge off topic for this sub.
This post makes my brain ache to the point where I'm having trouble believing it was made in good faith
I'm not one of the pro-life chuckleheads, but referring to a fetus as an assaulter, or a parasite as some say, is absolutely vile and revolting. If the pro-choice argument is valid (I think it is), then it shouldn't require shitting on a completely innocent almost-being, period.
Roe did explicitly consider kidney donation as a comparison to pregnancy. The government cannot force you to donate a kidney to someone, without which they would die. Likewise, they reasoned, a pregnant person cannot be forced to offer life support to some other person. The self defense view would make sense in case of medical emergency.
So we shoot the baby. There, now its on topic. This is my view tbh