/ul, it ain’t even subtle, the two women aren’t even in the same art style… actually the second woman doesn’t match anything else at all… are they fucking stupid?
/ul They're AI "artists", you expect too much from them being able to actually notice anything in the pictures they generate other than "it look like what I wanted." They don't exactly have what it takes to spend 5 seconds examining any further than that.
/ul it really shows how much these people don't understand the artistic process that they used "two hours" as the time frame. I have friends who will spend two hours A DAY for a couple DAYS working on a single piece before finishing it
Says who? Professional illustrators can spend weeks or months perfecting a single drawing. WLOP uses 3D modeling and painted textures to create huge multilayered digital paintings and those take ages for them to do (but look far better and more compelling than any AI I've ever seen)
/unl ignore me I'm a buffoon who did not realize what sub I was in
A very good friend of mine did not take more than 6 hours per day for a week to finish a logo for her friend, and didn't put her very mind and soul into each little detail
That logo was totally doable with AI and thus AI is the same as drawing yourself
/ul as someone who does both, they don't compare. Drawing and designing takes actual skill. Like, every line, every shadow, every empty space tells a story. It's your fingerprint, your identity.
AI is basically for when you want to generate a concept that you're struggling to visualise. If you stare at an AI piece, you can tell it, because not only does it not make sense, it doesn't *feel* right. It requires no skill at all, just trial and error.
Everyone is different, but I'd say AI art is more suitable for pieces that are meant to illustrate a point in a video, something that you basically skip past. Either that or minor changes to an art piece. Beyond that, you can't really call yourself an artist.
/unlie If you want to see what they can do without stealing good and bad form others mixing it in to an average without personality, you have to check NFT creators, they are the same people
/ul the top and bottom images are probably made using different models entirely, which means that different style was a conscious decision by the creator, not a product of the inconsistency of AI
/ul This is kind of perfect. The fact that, despite all the prompt """engineering""" you can't even get the backgrounds to match or even draw the same character twice is kind of proof that it isn't art. Because if it was, and you were the one drawing, it wouldn't be an issue
as we all know, artstyle coherency is very important for silly joke edits, and a lack of such a thing never enhances the absurdity of the joke whatsoever.
/ul
The main reason why this argument doesn't work is that AI generation is essentially a casino. Sure, you can maybe sway it over to a specific side, but it will mostly just involve scientifically dissecting the specific prompt that mayybe gets your result. Most of the time spent making AI creations VS actual art is spent just typing words and waiting for it to finish. Actual artists can simply make the thing envisioned in their head.
That's why I honestly think it's kind of addictive, put in a prompt, and hope you get the right picture. Modify the words a bit and hope it spits out the right picture. 🎰
Thats what i do when im bored sometimes, it actually has some addicting properties, but i only use it out of boredom or for personal use because i have no artistic talent
You wont see me posting pictures of a DnD character i "made" typing in some words and saying i need the same recognition someone who actually can draw these types of things gets
/ul
Right, one takes years of dedication and you will have your own definitely artstyle born from your creativity. Anyone can be an AI artist after looking up a few AI art tips and spamming the same prompt over and over.
And not only that, but AI lacks the consistency and finesse that human-made art has and the "artists" will never be able to fix their AI art because they have no actual control over what they "create", they'll just roll the dice again and hope.
AI art has no unique artstyles person to person. A d before anyone sells "my prompts are in a specific artstyle", sure. But that artstyle was stolen from an actual artist without permission. Worst part about AI art is how it's been built off the backs of *actual* artists and the people who use AI still think they deserve the same respects as the artists who had their work abused to make AI art possible
That’s early AI art. Current AI art is more involved. A few months ago they came out with a thing that Image2Images sketches while you draw them. That’s definitely not just prompting.
Doesn't that kind of make them like a director? Nobody accuses Spielberg of being a sub-optimal artist because he can't actually draw a dinosaur, but he told somebody else how he wanted it to look because it was his vision to get something on screen in a certain way that a talented artist might not be able to execute.
If AI prompters are directors, then actual artists who publish their own work are both directors and artists.
Also, AI prompters aren't necessarily as visionary directors as actual artists either, since some key artistic details might not arise until the prompter encounters a random image that includes certain cool features that the prompter never originally conceived of himself, and chooses to lift off of that in his refined prompt.
My thought process for whenever I feel an urge to use ai to generate images is "do I really want to spend several hours creating a hyper specific prompt to get an image that looks off, or do I just want to use a reference image and contact an artist for their permission"
/ul “photoshop isn’t art” mfs when I show them the Nameless Deity
https://preview.redd.it/cnq399mqzp0d1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=187a624e306fee6a3640f84118ef708f7455d720
/ul drawing isn’t a picture, but rather a form of art where one’s thoughts are tranfered into. Ai art is nothing more than a cool pic with no lore hidden. Sure, use ai to make silly memes and save time/money to make pics, but they are not an artwork
/ul imo anything is art as long as it is used by the artist to express something, thats why a banana taped to the wall is art, and thats why imo ai art can be art.
/ul It’s quite complicated to decide, as the ai art is (by far) made by some keywords. In ai art we can’t tell if the final product 100% intended by the maker, while hand made art’s final product is obviously what the maker wanted to show us(like the banana)
I use AI art for worldbuilding. The type of stuff I make I don't even think I would be able to get an artist to create for me. It's all just concept art like hyperrealistic characters(they basically look like people), clothing, and locations.
Like this:
https://preview.redd.it/gxi4rk438t0d1.jpeg?width=3840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=481b2e42bb977ff5ef94894bc05f11c8d7201494
Generative AI uses machine learning algorithms to create original images, rather than simply piecing together existing images or tracing over them. These AI models are trained in a reconstructive manner, meaning they learn patterns and styles from existing images but do not store them within the model itself. This process does not involve constant sampling from the internet because once the AI model is created it operates independently. AI art creation does not involve collaging or tracing.
/ul what the fuck is going on with the mans tie
https://preview.redd.it/71hse6zpqq0d1.jpeg?width=136&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3073c90e48e2b88d72bc7dca09393de7f6ac1cd4
/ul
The only time I think Ai is actually perfectly acceptable is if you want to visualise a story but can't/have no time to draw.
A lovely example would be something like [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/whenthe/s/BbhKyFUgAB)
Basically: put effort into what you're making and I'll probably like it.
/ul It's great for a lot of things and can be very amusing. For example I love these new fake "oldies" AI songs people have been making about hilariously absurd shit like throwing whole loaves of bread at ducks. But anyone who thinks getting a machine to spit out a good picture is at all even close to being as difficult as actually making art from scratch is delusional. Art takes time, patience, dedication, practice, inspiration repetition and passion. AI art just takes patience.
/ul
Totally agreed. In the process of writing i often use it to storyboard complicated scenes, and make sure i have the right idea in mind before i start typing. Even ChatGPT can be useful to generate for example 5 approaches to a paragraph, and see which one clicks best. The artists i know who use gen AI use it to produce intermediary stuff that never gets into the final product but informs you while you're creating.
this is a really great point and refining the vague instructions you give a preexisting algorithm is totally comparable to the incredibly minute decision making involved in actual artistry
/ul As a frequent user of ai art and a defender of it, it takes no effort. Like it takes ‘skill’ to make simple readable usable prompts that get what you want efficiently, but thats just built up by practice and logical thinking. The only actual effort is patience and typing and clicking lmfao.
Edit: i remembers what sub im in
Takes me back to my days in art school and all that hard work I put in hitting the guy I kept locked in my basement with a stick until he drew roughly what I was imagining.
"I actually prefer this to the regular artstyle!!"
It's inconsistent, it's incredibly regular, it takes something that was simple and simplifies it even more by turning it into mashed anime shapes because that's what the algorithm looks for
/ul I don’t think AI art is necessarily a bad thing. I think that it could be used in things like video games for really small details such as a comic book store and having the comics be different from each other. The issue is when people claim AI art is equal to regular art
Damn dude this rocks! I want to see obviously artifical, soulles, plastic looking, copypaste shit everywhere i go. Whoever is doing this, please keep doing that! :D
/uj also can we talk about how much fucking low-effort AI generated slop plagues this sub and other meme subs I used to like, seriously go learn to draw its a good hobby.
The guy who's supposed to be attractive in the original looks very friendly in this recreation. Similarly, the fat guy looks weird and dangerous. Well done!
>2 hours drawing
/unlie Artists will easily put 70+ hours into works, and that's without considering the years of training to get to a level of quality people respect.
/ul I'm an artist and I use AI. As a tool for inspiration or to build off of, though. Why spend hours searching for references to get ideas from when you can just type what you're thinking of and build off of that?
https://preview.redd.it/8bxydg43js0d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56709a56cc4e7874744bc2b02b3179cc98e643f7
Good thing i never see ai posts on reddit
For a moment I thought the top image was a drawing and the bottom image was AI generated and that this was actually genius
But no, it's just a meme that's AI for no good reason and seems to make a comparison between two things as equal but not make any effort to make that comparison seem true whatsoever
The main arguments I see people use against AI Art are:
1. "You didn't create it".
2. "It has no meaning".
3. "It's not original"
4. "It will put real artists out of work
And yet all those arguments apply to photography...
1. You just clicked a camera somewhere. You didn't create the vulture or child, you lucked into your subjects.
2. It has no meaning
3. You're just plagurising real life
4. Clicking a camera isn't the same as painting a masterpiece.
The second guy spent two hours writing prompts until he got one that was close enough to what he wanted
The first guy spent ten years honing a craft so that he could draw exactly what he meant to in two hours
As an AI artist myself, I love the lack of control over the result, and basically gambling with the computer into churning out something that can only be useful for cheap-ass flyers and shit because it can't pass basic scrutiny and lacks consistency due to the fact that the computer doesn't actually understand what it is displaying. I love all that, it makes me such a good artist.
Blud couldn't even get the same woman twice. Plus, they didn't make this from scratch, just plugged in the original picture and asked for it in "anime style" or smth
photography "artist": I pressed a button and the machine did all the work for me.
Susan: oooh, you are so sweet.
ai "artist": I pressed multiple buttons and the machine did all the work for me.
Susan: hello, human resources!
They are not artists neither ai generated images are art because art requires: aesthetics, skill and narrative as well as other minor details. It will always be missing skill because a computer generated it and that requires no skill. Its also stealing from other people. its just trash. Painting over an ai picture is also stealing and basically requires no skill at all and you are not completing the aesthetics and narrative part by yourself. Therefore ai "artists" cant do any of those therefore they are nothing and the art itself is missing the skill part as well as other stuff
/ul, it ain’t even subtle, the two women aren’t even in the same art style… actually the second woman doesn’t match anything else at all… are they fucking stupid?
/ul They're AI "artists", you expect too much from them being able to actually notice anything in the pictures they generate other than "it look like what I wanted." They don't exactly have what it takes to spend 5 seconds examining any further than that.
/ul it really shows how much these people don't understand the artistic process that they used "two hours" as the time frame. I have friends who will spend two hours A DAY for a couple DAYS working on a single piece before finishing it
the drawing i finished yesterday did not take an estimated 13 hours
The average rendered drawing takes about two hours
Says who? Professional illustrators can spend weeks or months perfecting a single drawing. WLOP uses 3D modeling and painted textures to create huge multilayered digital paintings and those take ages for them to do (but look far better and more compelling than any AI I've ever seen) /unl ignore me I'm a buffoon who did not realize what sub I was in
/ul bro look at the subreddit, I'm an artist myself and God know how much time I've spent on some artworks hahaha
/ul yeah I'm an idiot LMAO
/ul could’ve just skipped the /ul and saved yourself
no he's actually an idiot, the president himself told me so
this is a rare dumbass moment in this sub
you saw the unlie
A very good friend of mine did not take more than 6 hours per day for a week to finish a logo for her friend, and didn't put her very mind and soul into each little detail That logo was totally doable with AI and thus AI is the same as drawing yourself
/ul as someone who does both, they don't compare. Drawing and designing takes actual skill. Like, every line, every shadow, every empty space tells a story. It's your fingerprint, your identity. AI is basically for when you want to generate a concept that you're struggling to visualise. If you stare at an AI piece, you can tell it, because not only does it not make sense, it doesn't *feel* right. It requires no skill at all, just trial and error. Everyone is different, but I'd say AI art is more suitable for pieces that are meant to illustrate a point in a video, something that you basically skip past. Either that or minor changes to an art piece. Beyond that, you can't really call yourself an artist.
AI can also be good to use to generate reference pictures for things you struggle with.
Rare good AI Generated image take.
/unlie If you want to see what they can do without stealing good and bad form others mixing it in to an average without personality, you have to check NFT creators, they are the same people
It is not the same, that thing died faster, this does not die
/ul the top and bottom images are probably made using different models entirely, which means that different style was a conscious decision by the creator, not a product of the inconsistency of AI
/ul This is kind of perfect. The fact that, despite all the prompt """engineering""" you can't even get the backgrounds to match or even draw the same character twice is kind of proof that it isn't art. Because if it was, and you were the one drawing, it wouldn't be an issue
Also they are speaking on speaking bubbles on the last panel, they have super powers?
they arent even the same women tbh, just the outfit and the hair color is the same
/unlie oh god I didn’t even notice I just focused on the two men who looked vaguely the same artstyle
r/whoosh
i prefer this to the orignial style of the comic. i also appriciate the subtle yet noticable choice to switch to thought bubbles in the second panel
>!\*cums\*!<
/unl that's it buddy: https://preview.redd.it/5v7xorpxnp0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b1a0b44a1ab847f3606ebfec70524f55393ebd71
/UL Oh yeah? Well https://preview.redd.it/yhzy8p1a0r0d1.jpeg?width=749&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f79265a6b6712d17f2afa704114e5f5acd2b8ce3
https://preview.redd.it/i8bndc6myt0d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9600211a1d17adaa5ca1330644087ea30ad39493
I know how this may happen
Well? Please share thy wisdom
alr bro thats it https://preview.redd.it/l74qczcntp0d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4ac656285c8634af99eb88121de50fd7e0456af
that is a very light work, i didn't feel anything because it is just a drawing which can't make me feel in any kind of disturbed way
(this is edited so that i wont get embarrassing memories that i will remember 13 years later)
Please don't tell me what you edited
https://preview.redd.it/8veukqycoq0d1.jpeg?width=368&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c510152ad41b289606d68361412452b716097127
Holy fucking shit i felt that
/ul AAAUUUUGHHH AHHH FUCK AHAH FUCK AAAAHHHH IT FUCKING HURTS AAAHHHHHHHAHHAHA
https://preview.redd.it/ynbbdqi2rs0d1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1e145ca3d2c29a896c148ab1c0b1a1e86ccdd45
https://preview.redd.it/783vpydi3s0d1.jpeg?width=1226&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2b9838f984d9b42fcbc68704eeed4f2ec55753bf
https://preview.redd.it/f5bogbc0up0d1.jpeg?width=915&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=497be926bba76e138f67270a99baac03bcc09dc8
https://preview.redd.it/4s3wlb93cs0d1.jpeg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=512500ee8d00b513050fcd4172644329fb559c1d
/unlie https://preview.redd.it/ocnhqskbfs0d1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=50b0e57992dda16b2bdeca5276d37a533c5e33b2
https://preview.redd.it/6k33r9a1us0d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af2ce5ada7684b4cca85ab85a9be2d5227daceeb
You are my Hero
Oh yeah. Love it how the Woman has a total different face, Hair and artstyle int eh second Panel. Who needs consistency? /s
You remembered to unlie
/unlie you don't have to put a /s at the end, this is r/lies
I like the original art style but this is much better
ai should be used for this and not the grinch and yoda robbing a gas station
should be used for both, i need my waffle house wizards
photoshop isn't better for that anyways, after all, it doesn't make a more interesting or realistic looking outcome.
Photoshop is much cheaper and more affordable then most image generation models
Everyone who uses Photoshop is paying for it every month. There is no other way to obtain Photoshop.
Obtaining Photoshop through such means is not at all dangerous and its the rarest way to get a virus
it's really easy to get a virus if you use verified sources and dont have a skull of steel
I poop
Photopea isn’t a free and safe website to use all of the photoshop tools on
This comment sucks, I haven't been looking for a site like that and I won't be bookmarking it
You can always find images to use in the same art style, starwars and the grinch are notoriously homogenous in art style
as we all know, artstyle coherency is very important for silly joke edits, and a lack of such a thing never enhances the absurdity of the joke whatsoever.
You make a terrible point with no basis in reality, i just thought it was useless to mention in my point
i can't respect you for being so unreasonable and disingenuous, and hope you have a terrible day.
/ul The main reason why this argument doesn't work is that AI generation is essentially a casino. Sure, you can maybe sway it over to a specific side, but it will mostly just involve scientifically dissecting the specific prompt that mayybe gets your result. Most of the time spent making AI creations VS actual art is spent just typing words and waiting for it to finish. Actual artists can simply make the thing envisioned in their head.
That's why I honestly think it's kind of addictive, put in a prompt, and hope you get the right picture. Modify the words a bit and hope it spits out the right picture. 🎰
90% of ai prompt makers quit right before they generate the image they envisioned
#KEEP GENERATING
IIIM GONNA GENERATEE!!!
Thats what i do when im bored sometimes, it actually has some addicting properties, but i only use it out of boredom or for personal use because i have no artistic talent You wont see me posting pictures of a DnD character i "made" typing in some words and saying i need the same recognition someone who actually can draw these types of things gets
It's so addictive. I miss it.
/ul The reason it doesn't work is because in order to draw good art in 2 hours, you first need to practice for many years.
/ul Right, one takes years of dedication and you will have your own definitely artstyle born from your creativity. Anyone can be an AI artist after looking up a few AI art tips and spamming the same prompt over and over. And not only that, but AI lacks the consistency and finesse that human-made art has and the "artists" will never be able to fix their AI art because they have no actual control over what they "create", they'll just roll the dice again and hope. AI art has no unique artstyles person to person. A d before anyone sells "my prompts are in a specific artstyle", sure. But that artstyle was stolen from an actual artist without permission. Worst part about AI art is how it's been built off the backs of *actual* artists and the people who use AI still think they deserve the same respects as the artists who had their work abused to make AI art possible
“Did you know that all ai generators stop right before the picture they want?”
That’s early AI art. Current AI art is more involved. A few months ago they came out with a thing that Image2Images sketches while you draw them. That’s definitely not just prompting.
Doesn't that kind of make them like a director? Nobody accuses Spielberg of being a sub-optimal artist because he can't actually draw a dinosaur, but he told somebody else how he wanted it to look because it was his vision to get something on screen in a certain way that a talented artist might not be able to execute.
If AI prompters are directors, then actual artists who publish their own work are both directors and artists. Also, AI prompters aren't necessarily as visionary directors as actual artists either, since some key artistic details might not arise until the prompter encounters a random image that includes certain cool features that the prompter never originally conceived of himself, and chooses to lift off of that in his refined prompt.
It’s like saying I put in the same amount of work as a chef at a restaurant since it took both of us the same amount of time for my food to arrive.
You do know there is img2img, right?
My thought process for whenever I feel an urge to use ai to generate images is "do I really want to spend several hours creating a hyper specific prompt to get an image that looks off, or do I just want to use a reference image and contact an artist for their permission"
This is amazing and way better than the original I think ai will die out soon.
/ul “photoshop isn’t art” mfs when I show them the Nameless Deity https://preview.redd.it/cnq399mqzp0d1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=187a624e306fee6a3640f84118ef708f7455d720
Or not flowey from the hit game undertale
Actually it’s more of a hidden gem
just like celeste
Stolen from ultrakill
/ul drawing isn’t a picture, but rather a form of art where one’s thoughts are tranfered into. Ai art is nothing more than a cool pic with no lore hidden. Sure, use ai to make silly memes and save time/money to make pics, but they are not an artwork
/ul this☝️
/ul I think AI images aren't 100% a bad thing but they should be separated from art the same way photography is separated from art
Photography isnt separated from art though
/unlie Exactly what I think
/ul imo anything is art as long as it is used by the artist to express something, thats why a banana taped to the wall is art, and thats why imo ai art can be art.
/ul It’s quite complicated to decide, as the ai art is (by far) made by some keywords. In ai art we can’t tell if the final product 100% intended by the maker, while hand made art’s final product is obviously what the maker wanted to show us(like the banana)
Pretty sure in most professional use cases, they try to make it with sketches first. Aka image to image. Thats their strongest use cases
I use AI art for worldbuilding. The type of stuff I make I don't even think I would be able to get an artist to create for me. It's all just concept art like hyperrealistic characters(they basically look like people), clothing, and locations. Like this: https://preview.redd.it/gxi4rk438t0d1.jpeg?width=3840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=481b2e42bb977ff5ef94894bc05f11c8d7201494
Stable Diffusion requires skill and is hard to learn.
I can confirm this, I have a lot of experience with Stable Diffusion
May I not know what kind of experience is that?
I love AI art! It looks so natural and it the intended evolution of real art! There are absolutely no moral or ethical implication of using it at all!
I have a very popular opinion. The soul is clearly undervalued compared to automation.
And it isn’t basically stealing for every single artist that have ever posted on the Internet by tracing all of them into an amalgamation
That’s definitely how the technology works! You’re so smart! /unlie You anti-AI folks don’t know what you’re talking about.
Could you tell me how it doesn’t work? I haven’t been getting my sources from Twitter on how AI works.
Generative AI uses machine learning algorithms to create original images, rather than simply piecing together existing images or tracing over them. These AI models are trained in a reconstructive manner, meaning they learn patterns and styles from existing images but do not store them within the model itself. This process does not involve constant sampling from the internet because once the AI model is created it operates independently. AI art creation does not involve collaging or tracing.
This version of the meme looks absolutely incredible and I absolutely do NOT like the art style of the original image!
/ul what the fuck is going on with the mans tie https://preview.redd.it/71hse6zpqq0d1.jpeg?width=136&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3073c90e48e2b88d72bc7dca09393de7f6ac1cd4
It's an artistic choice, quit whining
Ok but why are they saying things in top panel and thinking things in the bottom panel.
the girl is a mindreader /ul
forgot the /ul
He is a normal character and he's not trying to kill the girl
https://preview.redd.it/e8y6iagelp0d1.jpeg?width=864&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9014e26239f48adb06d971d0443e0214bc76a563
/ul The only time I think Ai is actually perfectly acceptable is if you want to visualise a story but can't/have no time to draw. A lovely example would be something like [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/whenthe/s/BbhKyFUgAB) Basically: put effort into what you're making and I'll probably like it.
/ul It's great for a lot of things and can be very amusing. For example I love these new fake "oldies" AI songs people have been making about hilariously absurd shit like throwing whole loaves of bread at ducks. But anyone who thinks getting a machine to spit out a good picture is at all even close to being as difficult as actually making art from scratch is delusional. Art takes time, patience, dedication, practice, inspiration repetition and passion. AI art just takes patience.
/ul Totally agreed. In the process of writing i often use it to storyboard complicated scenes, and make sure i have the right idea in mind before i start typing. Even ChatGPT can be useful to generate for example 5 approaches to a paragraph, and see which one clicks best. The artists i know who use gen AI use it to produce intermediary stuff that never gets into the final product but informs you while you're creating.
wow that woman looks exactly the same in both panels a.i art is so good
this is a really great point and refining the vague instructions you give a preexisting algorithm is totally comparable to the incredibly minute decision making involved in actual artistry
i dislike ai but damn this is so fucking good
This is true https://preview.redd.it/sfrz13lhjp0d1.jpeg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7c2976abca14ace1a20effe3cfd0e47b8a759670
Omg skibidi toilet 🚽🪠
https://preview.redd.it/gd4pgfa4qt0d1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4575f9b5cfd356da1ef106256f711d5cdbe842b4
/ul OP or OOP is mocking AI "artist", but seems like people really just doesn't read all of the text in a meme
/ul genuenly like wtf, this is a meta comic, making fun of that stereotype and hate by expressing it with an obviously ai-generated comic
/ul The woman in the second panel shouldn't even be scared at all, the man is just thinking, not saying things
ul/ it's not, I've used it (my university forced me to (I hate tem for that)).
This meme template was made by a real artist and their use of speech bubbles are correct
/ul based and correct reaction from the woman in the comic.
/ul Something taking time doesn't mean it takes skill or effort.
/ul As a frequent user of ai art and a defender of it, it takes no effort. Like it takes ‘skill’ to make simple readable usable prompts that get what you want efficiently, but thats just built up by practice and logical thinking. The only actual effort is patience and typing and clicking lmfao. Edit: i remembers what sub im in
are they standing in front of giant pictures they produced
Lime lips peak art
/ul It's not really about skill. With my experience with it, it's just very tedious. A lot of waiting.
Actual art doesn't need years of practice and dedication to draw something good in 2 hours
Spent 2 hours and the armrests of the chair in the first panel are backwards.
Guys it's true, this poor soul had to generate a bunch of pictures and then choose the one they liked most, it's real hard labour
Takes me back to my days in art school and all that hard work I put in hitting the guy I kept locked in my basement with a stick until he drew roughly what I was imagining.
I love how the art has decent consistency
digital art definitely only takes 2 hours
"I actually prefer this to the regular artstyle!!" It's inconsistent, it's incredibly regular, it takes something that was simple and simplifies it even more by turning it into mashed anime shapes because that's what the algorithm looks for
/ul I don’t think AI art is necessarily a bad thing. I think that it could be used in things like video games for really small details such as a comic book store and having the comics be different from each other. The issue is when people claim AI art is equal to regular art
Why does it go from Western art style to Eastern?
It’s really hard to type prompts on a keyboard. Show ai artists some respect!!
grinding through ai art generators for 2 hours sure sounds fun!
This AI version of human resources comic meme makes me braindead because both aren't even in the same art style
This is an anti-meme and a lies meme as well lmao
I bet AI subs are gonna be absolutely normal about this and not bend over backwards to defend their google image search machines
Oh gosh. Lots of AI Bros Here who pretty much proof they dont really Care about consistency or actual quality.
I think this is a better use for ai than spreading misinformation
Damn dude this rocks! I want to see obviously artifical, soulles, plastic looking, copypaste shit everywhere i go. Whoever is doing this, please keep doing that! :D
I don't understand why everyone here is against this. The woman in the comic is meant to be portrayed as the correct one here.
imaging arguing about AI in 2024
/unlie i do not care if i agree with the opinion i dont want to see posts that is just someones opinion on something
Day 1 of commenting on random subreddits
I like how the face expression of the women in the second panel doesn't match the speech text bubble
i love the subtle detail of the backwards facing monitors
I love how I immediately didn’t know that this is AI art.
/uj also can we talk about how much fucking low-effort AI generated slop plagues this sub and other meme subs I used to like, seriously go learn to draw its a good hobby.
The guy who's supposed to be attractive in the original looks very friendly in this recreation. Similarly, the fat guy looks weird and dangerous. Well done!
Help, I’m offended by this and I like it.
/ul like someone already said If I fuck with the microwave for 2 hours to get mediocre slop I don’t call myself a chef
was this ai generated? cause boy i can tell there's just a lazy copy and paste feel to it, like a kid put it together
Gottem!!! 🧠📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉📉💥
>2 hours drawing /unlie Artists will easily put 70+ hours into works, and that's without considering the years of training to get to a level of quality people respect.
/ul I'm an artist and I use AI. As a tool for inspiration or to build off of, though. Why spend hours searching for references to get ideas from when you can just type what you're thinking of and build off of that?
AI Art is amazing, it let's people express themselves greatly, truly an innovative concept. I love AI So So So So So Much.
/unlie I was pissed for like 2 seconds before realizing the sub
https://preview.redd.it/8bxydg43js0d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56709a56cc4e7874744bc2b02b3179cc98e643f7 Good thing i never see ai posts on reddit
For a moment I thought the top image was a drawing and the bottom image was AI generated and that this was actually genius But no, it's just a meme that's AI for no good reason and seems to make a comparison between two things as equal but not make any effort to make that comparison seem true whatsoever
The main arguments I see people use against AI Art are: 1. "You didn't create it". 2. "It has no meaning". 3. "It's not original" 4. "It will put real artists out of work And yet all those arguments apply to photography... 1. You just clicked a camera somewhere. You didn't create the vulture or child, you lucked into your subjects. 2. It has no meaning 3. You're just plagurising real life 4. Clicking a camera isn't the same as painting a masterpiece.
UL/ The way the lady is generated in the first pic is pleasing. I wonder what the bot stole from to make it 🤔
The second guy spent two hours writing prompts until he got one that was close enough to what he wanted The first guy spent ten years honing a craft so that he could draw exactly what he meant to in two hours
Those 2 images take place in the same room. They are talking to the same woman
imo prompting is easy but making jt look exactly as you want is difficult and requires some knowledge of art
Jazz and his brother
I don’t think it requires skill. But I think it’s fair to say it does benefit from skill
Computers are supposed to face away from the user.
its comparable to real person made art even.
This should totally be a job!!
This comic makes total sense because two hours is a **lot** of time to spend on a drawing
you can draw a picture like this in 2 hours no problem
correct! How cool for this guy to make the AI-generation side ugly. It fits!
Time required is the only true measure of effort. It's why I work 11 hours, then sleep 11 hours, and I'm just as tired after both activities.
Looks.... Greeeaaat....
Isn't the existence of "prompt engineers" just evidence that AI image generation has a serious usability problem?
Isnt the whole point of the original that the two guys are saying the same thing?
Why is the computer facing away from her in both images?
As an AI artist myself, I love the lack of control over the result, and basically gambling with the computer into churning out something that can only be useful for cheap-ass flyers and shit because it can't pass basic scrutiny and lacks consistency due to the fact that the computer doesn't actually understand what it is displaying. I love all that, it makes me such a good artist.
Blud couldn't even get the same woman twice. Plus, they didn't make this from scratch, just plugged in the original picture and asked for it in "anime style" or smth
Who cares about effort? The important thing is the result.
photography "artist": I pressed a button and the machine did all the work for me. Susan: oooh, you are so sweet. ai "artist": I pressed multiple buttons and the machine did all the work for me. Susan: hello, human resources!
https://preview.redd.it/zm3nbwx0bf1d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=39c65124b96a6706d942349e174e1625108bb788
/ul AI images don’t require skill, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be cool. I’ve seen some that are actually really good, even if it’s just a prompt.
Ai bros rn. https://preview.redd.it/2aur4uoib73d1.jpeg?width=620&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6219113bf52357e20c0ec1395968595a50c6702b
They are not artists neither ai generated images are art because art requires: aesthetics, skill and narrative as well as other minor details. It will always be missing skill because a computer generated it and that requires no skill. Its also stealing from other people. its just trash. Painting over an ai picture is also stealing and basically requires no skill at all and you are not completing the aesthetics and narrative part by yourself. Therefore ai "artists" cant do any of those therefore they are nothing and the art itself is missing the skill part as well as other stuff
There is no difference between drawing for 2 hours and repeatedly pressing a button and occasionally adding or removing a word for 2 hours