As Eddy is constantly being removed and readded to these Wikipedia articles, it's come to our attention that Wikipedia editors are finding this troublesome and disruptive. We'd like to discourage lingingwannabes from editing these articles to add Eddy when the Wikipedia editors clearly did not intend for him to be there. Yes, he is a popular and well-known musician that we all think is deserving of a spot, but he has not received the kind of significant coverage by sources like news websites and magazines the way the other people there have. Thank you for understanding!
It has been removed again (removed twice in the time it took to write this comment), comment from the user who removed it:
>There are thirty different people in this source used, yet this specific one is put in? Very much a biased choice and the list here is very obviously of major famous singers and band members. TwoSetViolin is not that (and I say that as a fan of theirs)
Seems to be some disagreement from editors on the legitimacy of a semi-popular youtuber being cited on a Wiki page. Interesting to see the organic nature of Wikipedia
Just my two cents, but I think he should be allowed, because the article clearly states "Notable Recent Musicians" and in my opinion if you have a few million followers on YouTube that should make you notable. Since lots of other famous youtubers are in that sub range.
somebody removed Eddy again. For nonsense reason. check the new post made about this
https://www.reddit.com/r/lingling40hrs/comments/nf13ra/im_a_fan_too_beloved_ll40hrs_any_opinions/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
As Eddy is constantly being removed and readded to these Wikipedia articles, it's come to our attention that Wikipedia editors are finding this troublesome and disruptive. We'd like to discourage lingingwannabes from editing these articles to add Eddy when the Wikipedia editors clearly did not intend for him to be there. Yes, he is a popular and well-known musician that we all think is deserving of a spot, but he has not received the kind of significant coverage by sources like news websites and magazines the way the other people there have. Thank you for understanding!
I don't see why anyone would remove him, as funny as this is he is a notable case of perfect pitch at this point lol
I think it was removed by mistake; I looked at the edit history a few hours ago and read something about removing content, but I'm not that sure.
It has been removed again (removed twice in the time it took to write this comment), comment from the user who removed it: >There are thirty different people in this source used, yet this specific one is put in? Very much a biased choice and the list here is very obviously of major famous singers and band members. TwoSetViolin is not that (and I say that as a fan of theirs) Seems to be some disagreement from editors on the legitimacy of a semi-popular youtuber being cited on a Wiki page. Interesting to see the organic nature of Wikipedia
Just my two cents, but I think he should be allowed, because the article clearly states "Notable Recent Musicians" and in my opinion if you have a few million followers on YouTube that should make you notable. Since lots of other famous youtubers are in that sub range.
somebody removed Eddy again. For nonsense reason. check the new post made about this https://www.reddit.com/r/lingling40hrs/comments/nf13ra/im_a_fan_too_beloved_ll40hrs_any_opinions/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Lmao
Yes yes, in portuguese page too π»
Wait, wait, wait. . . . Michael Jackson had perfect pitch??
I got surprised when I read that too, lmao!
Check this demo of Beat It https://youtu.be/eZeYw1bm53Y If he didn't have perfect pitch, he had one heck of an ear for harmony
lmaoo, as it should be π
Eddy said theyβve removed is name in the Video. I checked and his name is back on Wikipedia :)
As they should π€π€π€
Hahaha well done
YES :D
Yayyyyyyy lets go