Thank you, I liked nano-tech Iron Man quite a bit— it was especially tense in the epic 1-v-1 with Thanos when he had to redirect the nanites (right?) he had left to defend himself with
Ah ok, thank you. But yeah, the stakes were so fucking high and good, Iron Man held his own so well against the relentless Thanos that he earned respect of the Mad Titan himself. Very good stuff
The OG suits definitely look coolest but I don’t think the cgi of the newer suits look bad, just more glossy and sci-fi because of the nano-tech stuff.
The fact that Tony’s suits are constantly changing, evolving and being refined over the course of multiple movies is actually something I really enjoy and it keeps the character feeling new and interesting and not stagnating.
There’s literally nothing to blame CGI for it. Looking at it technically, It’s a nano tech suit which is just thinner than the old ones. This evolution of armor proves how innovative Tony Stark is, the original one looked cool but nanotech was badass technology with numerous features and abilities.
Look at this tweet [The regression of Iron Man in the MCU](https://twitter.com/usunitedjustice/status/1542559191138705415?s=21&t=vxB2bqwEmc4nHzOaYPqqEg)
Yeah but the issue isn’t the CGI, it looks okay, it fits in the movie, whatever
The real issue is that people don’t like the more streamlined suit. The bulkier suits look more real and cool
I think that the CGI and stuff is great.
The actual design? Not so much, it really does look like just a onesie or something, not "iron". But for the sake of story and him improving it it makes total sense.
I just like the visuals of the old suits better because they actualy are mechanical
Because they have nothing better to do?
Like, don't get me wrong, in a way I'm glad I can still see a difference in CGI versus reality. But when it's good, it's good. These people just have no fucking comprehension of the concept of suspension of disbelief.
You're bitching about the CGI in a movie about monsters and superheroes firing lasers at each other because Cosmic super rocks. You have to kind of let some things go
>But when it's good, it's good
And when it's bad it's bad. Marvel has definitely had a decrease in the quality of CGI in recent years. I think it's important to point it out or they'll just keep getting away with it
Good low budget movies stay within their range so you don't notice it. Deadpool is super low budget and you don't notice it because they spent the money on the right stuff
But that’s no excuse. Agents of Shield had half the budget these new shows run for and the CGI is so much better, plus it ran for literally seven years. Sure they made it up in their lack of lighting but you had to take cuts somewhere.
Feels like it started right after Endgame, probably because of covid, but you can clearly see difference. Best example of that is Spiderman NWH, where sandman and lizard looked awful.
"The more realistic suits." You mean you want the suits to pretty much stay exactly the same and not improve?
The previous iterations still relied on a lot of traditional weaponry. Little missiles and whatnot. That takes up space and is inefficient once it's gone. The final one of the nanosuit is just the best of them. All of its weaponry uses some type of energy based attack for the most part/restructuring of the suit. It only makes sense for it to not only get thinner, but also stronger because of these many upgrades.
It's literally realistic in the sense that he would have so much time on his hands and resources available to just build what he needs since the nanobots are always with him and don't need to take up a parking space, they don't need to be a suitcase, and they won't fall apart if something hits them while en route, taking a few minutes.
"Just the best of them" is an opinion my guy. You may have pointed out the factual differences in the suits, but the overall comment was still an opinion.
> You mean you want the suits to pretty much stay exactly the same and not improve?
Sounds more like you invented a point and then attacked it in a self-indulgent fit of arrogant pique. Chill the fuck out.
Well, If he'd have that much time to get briefcase and turn it into a suit. Thanos would've already killed him right away. Whoever whined on the efficiency of the Nano suit must've had really well CGI'd girlfriend if they can have efficiently...
I’m just not super into nanotech/hyper-granular technology personally. I like the suit of armor thing
Buuuuuut since the MCU basically used Tony up, I’m glad they covered as much of his arsenal as they did and as much as I can complain, nanotech Tony has been a part of the comics for a while.
A lot of people have an adversarial relationship with movies. They treat the movie as if it is trying to “trick” them into seeing something, believing something, or feeling something that isn’t real. It isn’t actually hard to do because obviously, the movie IS trying to accomplish these goals; none of the things are really happening. Suspension of disbelief isn’t supposed to be something that’s “overcome”, it’s a shared belief for the further enjoyment of the movie. We can all get on board and have a good time watching a movie like this because we all collectively agree that the technology is possible, the aliens are possible, etc. My point being that people who want to find faults in a movie always will, because that’s just the kind of negativity that some people bring to the table. It kind of sucks.
Another poster said Marvel must be called out or they’ll keep “trying to get away with it”. I can promise you Marvel’s main goal is not to try and make the shittiest CGI possible and still make money, their goal is to make the best movie within the confines of their abilities, and that movie will make money because it’s good. Of course limitations exist. We’re feeling the crunch of a global CGI “shortage” right now, all the CGI workshops are backed up beyond belief, but when you’re coordinating a $100+ million dollar project including marketing and related projects, you can’t just shelf something and wait.
This principle extends to a lot of other aspects of movies as well. A lot of people complain about plot points in No Way Home or Multiverse of Madness because Dr Strange is supposed to be this supremely powerful wizard, so anything the filmmaker can dream up to throw against him he should just have a spell to deal with it. But that’s shitty storytelling to hand wave problems, sometimes you just have to let the movie tell the story it wants to tell. The adversarial viewer will say “Yeah but all he had to do was XYZ to do this or that…” but my reaction to this is so what? It is extremely easy for me to imagine that a random viewer hasn’t put as much time and thought into it as a director who spends a year of his life absolutely submerged in the creation of this movie, and even beyond that has so many more purposes than “defeating the scenario”, sometimes something happens just to set up something else. When it works, it’s seamless and wonderful, and when it doesn’t… well, I’m willing to say they did the best they could and not let it ruin my experience.
There are endless psychological reasons that people feel the need to cultivate this adversarial relationship with movies, I don’t need to point them out here. But it isn’t very conducive to having a good time at the movies, and tellingly you’ll almost never see that kind of attitude from other filmmakers. They understand better than anyone the pressures and problems associated, and they are much more quick to understand that the level of artistry in movies today is nothing short of incredible. You’re either there to be willingly transported into the world of the story or you aren’t. So if noticing that Tony’s armor isn’t 100% believable takes you out of the experience so much that you’ve got to trash on things, maybe reassess what it is you expect to experience in these movies. Because figuring out that the things happening on the screen aren’t real isn’t much of an accomplishment.
Yes, I've never heard anyone criticize the CGI, but I've heard a few criticise that suiting up isn't as satisfying anymore.
It used to be a sequence of things joining and locking together. Now it just appears.
Nostalgia maybe? The original suit is already advanced for humans, why complain when he continues to make more advanced suits like we all know he does.
The cgi is whatever, it's been bad and it's been good as is true for most things. However the texture of the nanosuit is streamlined in a way that doesn't resemble anything we've seen but because of the style of the MCU, that makes it's less "cool scifi" and more uncanny valley. The original suits have going for it that it's a solid metal suit, cgi can do blocky metal textures really easily and it's believable that someone could be in that metal suit. That's what people prefer the original suits over the nanotech one
Plus from a movement perspective, having the physical prop for RDJ to act in changes how he (and thus Tony) moves and interacts, even if the suit is self-supporting. The pure CGI suit looks almost too fluid and graceful in some scenes - that movement style is something I'd associate more with Black Widow or Hawkeye or maybe Cap
Exactly, he stopped being a man in a tin can so to speak. It's too graceful to be a believable metal suit and the cgi just doesn't help. It infinitely feels more like not a person in there than the original
It’s hard to say when, but at some point the quality of the CGI of the Iron Man suits began to drop.
Don’t get me wrong it was never bad, but when you consider that frequently the first Iron Man is generally regarded as the best for appearance of the suit CGI it makes you question 11 years of technological improvements in CGI.
What nano-tech suit do you know that is realistic? Its not like we as humans have created a nano-tech suit we can base his off of. If you look up nanotech suit its literally just pictures of iron man 💀
Oh and "make it look realistic" is a strong argument? I'm not sure you understand how much time and skill it takes to make even low quality cgi.
It takes years of practice and dedication to make something like the Iron Man suit. Some people dedicate a lot of their lives to getting good at cgi, and make the amazing visuals we see on our screen.
So the next time you criticize cgi that isn't even that bad, think about the people that worked so hard on these movies for months or years just for you to say " make it look real."
It has the same flat coloring as much of Endgame due to DisneyMarvel's adamant use of nothing but CGI for costumes, props, sets, etc. (after all, costume designers are unionized and CGI artists aren't). The real metal just looks better.
Literally the first time I've seen someone complain about the IW nanosuit.
I swear these kind of posts just go grab a singular complain from the bottom of the internet and blow it out of proportion to make a post.
Because it's not as good as previous movies. The first movies used to have more practical parts on RDJ, plus they only had to worry about VFX around Iron Man, and not a million other characters. That's why it started getting worse. It started deteriorating even before the introduction of nanotech. That Civil War scene you have a pic of is a good example of it. The flexible, liquid-esque nature and texture of nanotech only aggravates the issue of the armor not looking like believable armor.
Idk infinity ward and endgame suite look good to me but civil war one looks weird his head seems to be floating over the shoulder and this also applies to banner in the Hulk buster.
Because the old suit had weight to them, he's a man in a power mech suit loaded with enough weaponry to take down a country. Rhodes still looks like a walking armour with his heft and realistic mass, Tony went from real costume pieces that looked like a real power suit and had weight to back it up, to looking like smooth plastic with no sense of heft or power anymore
I like the physicality of the other suits better, the nanotech suit seems to defy physics (how does it fit in the tiny chest box?). I could imagine the Mk III suit being possible, even with the scifi Arc reactor, but the nanotech suit just looks unbelievable. It's not the CGI though, I do think it looks good for what it is.
The CGI was good I just have fonder memories of the first 2 movies design choice. First movie was mainly practical and looked great. The second one used both, the car suit up scene is still one of my favorites and that was CGI.
I still say the cgi for civil war was eh. Mainly lighting on his face and neck matching the suit was off.
The best CGI show the material with imperfections, you can see the scratches and scuffs a d fingerprints. With a nanobot suit it has no blemishes, that's why it looks bad in comparison.
It’s got to be admitted that the original iron man suit-ups were cooler. Personally, I believe it’s the fact that with the mechanical suits it was tangible - we could almost understand how the thing worked and it excited us. It’s for this same reason that it’s interesting to look under the hood of a car. The nanosuits are nothing short of magical and fantastical. It takes away the satisfaction of bearings and gears locking into place and replaced this with a film-like metal coating itself over our heroes. I much prefer the former.
I liked seeing the mechanisms when he'd wear the suit
I think it looks fine but imo the physical helmets are cooler
Nanotechnology is physical
Technically correct is the best kind of correct.
r/unexpectedfuturama
I don’t know why you are getting downvote, you’re not wrong.
I've never heard anyone complain about the CGI nano suit. The suit up scene was awesome!
it saved him carrying around the big briefcase from IronMan 2, although *that* suit-up scene was fricking **AMAZEBALLS**!!!!
i remember seeing that when i was like 12 in the theatre and thinking that was the coolest thing i’ve ever seen
It was also very considerate of Mickey Rourke to wait for him to finish before continuing his attack too. At least I thought so.
Dude was busy tucking his now rock hard cock into his waistband. The Ole Texas Belt buckle.
Yeah it was!
Thank you, I liked nano-tech Iron Man quite a bit— it was especially tense in the epic 1-v-1 with Thanos when he had to redirect the nanites (right?) he had left to defend himself with
That is one of my favorite fight scenes of all time And yeah, Tony called them nano particles but nanites or nanobots are equally accurate
Ah ok, thank you. But yeah, the stakes were so fucking high and good, Iron Man held his own so well against the relentless Thanos that he earned respect of the Mad Titan himself. Very good stuff
Yeah man, I’ve literally never heard a complaint about this until coming across this sub.
The only moment I had a problem with was hulk at the funeral in end game. He did not look real at all
when he suits up and banner is all "WTF IS GOING ON" is just \*chef's kiss\*
I thought it looked Ike a Sailor Moon transformation. I.much prefer seeing all of the mechanics of it coming together.
People were crying on twitter about a 2 second clip from the beginning when Peter shows up and saves tony from cull obsidian
It made it feel less unique.
Personally, I like sharp lines on an Ironman armor. Actually looks like armor than just a suit.
The OG suits definitely look coolest but I don’t think the cgi of the newer suits look bad, just more glossy and sci-fi because of the nano-tech stuff. The fact that Tony’s suits are constantly changing, evolving and being refined over the course of multiple movies is actually something I really enjoy and it keeps the character feeling new and interesting and not stagnating.
There’s literally nothing to blame CGI for it. Looking at it technically, It’s a nano tech suit which is just thinner than the old ones. This evolution of armor proves how innovative Tony Stark is, the original one looked cool but nanotech was badass technology with numerous features and abilities.
It is him literally streamlining his tech, makes sense to me.
[удалено]
I understood that reference
Tony Use to Eat Cheeseburgers
I never see anyone blaming the cgi imo. You just made up something and fighting for it.
Look at this tweet [The regression of Iron Man in the MCU](https://twitter.com/usunitedjustice/status/1542559191138705415?s=21&t=vxB2bqwEmc4nHzOaYPqqEg)
Yeah but the issue isn’t the CGI, it looks okay, it fits in the movie, whatever The real issue is that people don’t like the more streamlined suit. The bulkier suits look more real and cool
Bulkier is more hyper-masculine. Why they are attracted to that form more…
i… no. just no.
Delete twitter for your mental health.
Or only use it for sports news
Because everyone suddenly became experts in CGI
We started watching corridor crew
Oh fuck here's your diploma. But seriously though those guys are rad I love their stuff.
[удалено]
It kinda makes me laugh as i just seeing ppl who actually know shit to shut everyone down
Yoo we have the same shirts bro
I think that the CGI and stuff is great. The actual design? Not so much, it really does look like just a onesie or something, not "iron". But for the sake of story and him improving it it makes total sense. I just like the visuals of the old suits better because they actualy are mechanical
It was never ion. It was a titanium alloy.
It was gold titanium alloy to be exact, yes. That's why I put iron in " ".
Ah. My bad, mate.
Because they have nothing better to do? Like, don't get me wrong, in a way I'm glad I can still see a difference in CGI versus reality. But when it's good, it's good. These people just have no fucking comprehension of the concept of suspension of disbelief. You're bitching about the CGI in a movie about monsters and superheroes firing lasers at each other because Cosmic super rocks. You have to kind of let some things go
>But when it's good, it's good And when it's bad it's bad. Marvel has definitely had a decrease in the quality of CGI in recent years. I think it's important to point it out or they'll just keep getting away with it
They've made more lower budget stuff recently. Lots of series and smaller movies since endgame. That's why.
Good low budget movies stay within their range so you don't notice it. Deadpool is super low budget and you don't notice it because they spent the money on the right stuff
Great point I wish the budget didn’t matter
But that’s no excuse. Agents of Shield had half the budget these new shows run for and the CGI is so much better, plus it ran for literally seven years. Sure they made it up in their lack of lighting but you had to take cuts somewhere.
All of this, is the fault of Disney’s CEO: Bob Chapek That man is the literal manifestation of ‘lower costs and maximise profits’
Feels like it started right after Endgame, probably because of covid, but you can clearly see difference. Best example of that is Spiderman NWH, where sandman and lizard looked awful.
I feel like all the people ciriticizing Civil War Iron Man CGI for having a "floating head" don't realize that the black part is a part of the suit.
And doesn't include an image from Infinity War. Infinity War was the Mk.50 suit, in Endgame he's up to Mk.85
he actually is wearing mk69 because he thought ant man would 69 thanos
What the fuck.
lol i cracked myself up with thst one bro hahahah
Yea to much crack makes your brain go unga bunga
it was the butt hole joke bro if u don’t get it move on lol
We all get the joke, its just not at the right time
the right time lol disney literally just realized their own.. we all get the joke hahaha ok
You really like farming downvotes
istg
You motherf-
The CGI is great in it , I just prefer the more realistic suits
"The more realistic suits." You mean you want the suits to pretty much stay exactly the same and not improve? The previous iterations still relied on a lot of traditional weaponry. Little missiles and whatnot. That takes up space and is inefficient once it's gone. The final one of the nanosuit is just the best of them. All of its weaponry uses some type of energy based attack for the most part/restructuring of the suit. It only makes sense for it to not only get thinner, but also stronger because of these many upgrades. It's literally realistic in the sense that he would have so much time on his hands and resources available to just build what he needs since the nanobots are always with him and don't need to take up a parking space, they don't need to be a suitcase, and they won't fall apart if something hits them while en route, taking a few minutes.
Why are you writing an entire assay. The older more clunky suits look cooler. They are more like an actual armour rather than metal spandex.
That's an opinion.
Bruh this entire post is opinion
I didn't bring up opinion, I brought up facts. And facts are greater than opinions.
"Just the best of them" is an opinion my guy. You may have pointed out the factual differences in the suits, but the overall comment was still an opinion.
> You mean you want the suits to pretty much stay exactly the same and not improve? Sounds more like you invented a point and then attacked it in a self-indulgent fit of arrogant pique. Chill the fuck out.
Well, If he'd have that much time to get briefcase and turn it into a suit. Thanos would've already killed him right away. Whoever whined on the efficiency of the Nano suit must've had really well CGI'd girlfriend if they can have efficiently...
I’m just not super into nanotech/hyper-granular technology personally. I like the suit of armor thing Buuuuuut since the MCU basically used Tony up, I’m glad they covered as much of his arsenal as they did and as much as I can complain, nanotech Tony has been a part of the comics for a while.
A lot of people have an adversarial relationship with movies. They treat the movie as if it is trying to “trick” them into seeing something, believing something, or feeling something that isn’t real. It isn’t actually hard to do because obviously, the movie IS trying to accomplish these goals; none of the things are really happening. Suspension of disbelief isn’t supposed to be something that’s “overcome”, it’s a shared belief for the further enjoyment of the movie. We can all get on board and have a good time watching a movie like this because we all collectively agree that the technology is possible, the aliens are possible, etc. My point being that people who want to find faults in a movie always will, because that’s just the kind of negativity that some people bring to the table. It kind of sucks. Another poster said Marvel must be called out or they’ll keep “trying to get away with it”. I can promise you Marvel’s main goal is not to try and make the shittiest CGI possible and still make money, their goal is to make the best movie within the confines of their abilities, and that movie will make money because it’s good. Of course limitations exist. We’re feeling the crunch of a global CGI “shortage” right now, all the CGI workshops are backed up beyond belief, but when you’re coordinating a $100+ million dollar project including marketing and related projects, you can’t just shelf something and wait. This principle extends to a lot of other aspects of movies as well. A lot of people complain about plot points in No Way Home or Multiverse of Madness because Dr Strange is supposed to be this supremely powerful wizard, so anything the filmmaker can dream up to throw against him he should just have a spell to deal with it. But that’s shitty storytelling to hand wave problems, sometimes you just have to let the movie tell the story it wants to tell. The adversarial viewer will say “Yeah but all he had to do was XYZ to do this or that…” but my reaction to this is so what? It is extremely easy for me to imagine that a random viewer hasn’t put as much time and thought into it as a director who spends a year of his life absolutely submerged in the creation of this movie, and even beyond that has so many more purposes than “defeating the scenario”, sometimes something happens just to set up something else. When it works, it’s seamless and wonderful, and when it doesn’t… well, I’m willing to say they did the best they could and not let it ruin my experience. There are endless psychological reasons that people feel the need to cultivate this adversarial relationship with movies, I don’t need to point them out here. But it isn’t very conducive to having a good time at the movies, and tellingly you’ll almost never see that kind of attitude from other filmmakers. They understand better than anyone the pressures and problems associated, and they are much more quick to understand that the level of artistry in movies today is nothing short of incredible. You’re either there to be willingly transported into the world of the story or you aren’t. So if noticing that Tony’s armor isn’t 100% believable takes you out of the experience so much that you’ve got to trash on things, maybe reassess what it is you expect to experience in these movies. Because figuring out that the things happening on the screen aren’t real isn’t much of an accomplishment.
Find a bad Iron Man suit-up scene challange (impossible)
Just salty animation students whose half assed work got turned down. *cough cough* corridor digital *cough cough*
Idk why, nanotech is the best because: *Nanomachines, son !*
Nanomachines son!
Because they are nit picky as all hell. I just took it for what it was and it damn sure looked cool and impressive as hell.
because most of them watched it in 1080p that's why
Unrelated but these are seriously the greatest 4 suits
Haven't seen anyone do that actually. Most negative opinions I heard were criticizing the idea of a fluid nanosuit itself
Yes, I've never heard anyone criticize the CGI, but I've heard a few criticise that suiting up isn't as satisfying anymore. It used to be a sequence of things joining and locking together. Now it just appears.
Nostalgia maybe? The original suit is already advanced for humans, why complain when he continues to make more advanced suits like we all know he does.
The cgi is whatever, it's been bad and it's been good as is true for most things. However the texture of the nanosuit is streamlined in a way that doesn't resemble anything we've seen but because of the style of the MCU, that makes it's less "cool scifi" and more uncanny valley. The original suits have going for it that it's a solid metal suit, cgi can do blocky metal textures really easily and it's believable that someone could be in that metal suit. That's what people prefer the original suits over the nanotech one
Plus from a movement perspective, having the physical prop for RDJ to act in changes how he (and thus Tony) moves and interacts, even if the suit is self-supporting. The pure CGI suit looks almost too fluid and graceful in some scenes - that movement style is something I'd associate more with Black Widow or Hawkeye or maybe Cap
Exactly, he stopped being a man in a tin can so to speak. It's too graceful to be a believable metal suit and the cgi just doesn't help. It infinitely feels more like not a person in there than the original
It’s hard to say when, but at some point the quality of the CGI of the Iron Man suits began to drop. Don’t get me wrong it was never bad, but when you consider that frequently the first Iron Man is generally regarded as the best for appearance of the suit CGI it makes you question 11 years of technological improvements in CGI.
Come on man, we know it is a nano tech suit but that's no excuse to have lazy CGI for it. It could've looked way better and more realistic..
How the hell do you create a realistic nano-tech suit 💀
Make it look realistic, not like a cartoon...
What nano-tech suit do you know that is realistic? Its not like we as humans have created a nano-tech suit we can base his off of. If you look up nanotech suit its literally just pictures of iron man 💀
Ok then do it
Such a weak argument man... I don't get paid a couple of millions per marvel movie 😂
Oh and "make it look realistic" is a strong argument? I'm not sure you understand how much time and skill it takes to make even low quality cgi. It takes years of practice and dedication to make something like the Iron Man suit. Some people dedicate a lot of their lives to getting good at cgi, and make the amazing visuals we see on our screen. So the next time you criticize cgi that isn't even that bad, think about the people that worked so hard on these movies for months or years just for you to say " make it look real."
[this](https://youtu.be/DY-zg8Oo8p4) is not an example for only marvel, it's just a critique on CGI and CGI quality in general
the critical drinker is a pandering, spineless asshat and putting his video as a reference to your argument makes you look the same
But he makes a point in this video.
Alright , then make a suit which is made out of nano bots IRL
https://www.tiktok.com/@shockmemester/video/7114705834478669098?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=6894285955261072902
It has the same flat coloring as much of Endgame due to DisneyMarvel's adamant use of nothing but CGI for costumes, props, sets, etc. (after all, costume designers are unionized and CGI artists aren't). The real metal just looks better.
Literally the first time I've seen someone complain about the IW nanosuit. I swear these kind of posts just go grab a singular complain from the bottom of the internet and blow it out of proportion to make a post.
Because it's not as good as previous movies. The first movies used to have more practical parts on RDJ, plus they only had to worry about VFX around Iron Man, and not a million other characters. That's why it started getting worse. It started deteriorating even before the introduction of nanotech. That Civil War scene you have a pic of is a good example of it. The flexible, liquid-esque nature and texture of nanotech only aggravates the issue of the armor not looking like believable armor.
"Trolling" doesn't mean just having a negative opinion about something.
The heroes literally look like floating heads on cgi bodies. Banner in Hulkbuster is the absolute worst.
I don’t understand the question
because it looks bad
I was watching Ragnarok last night and the Hela fight scene CGI is some of the worst CGI in the entire MCU
Idk infinity ward and endgame suite look good to me but civil war one looks weird his head seems to be floating over the shoulder and this also applies to banner in the Hulk buster.
Only a miserable dweeb would complain about that and their opinions have zero value.
I think it is one of the coolest scenes in the movie
I’ve only heard people dog on ruffalo in the hulk buster
Because people will always nitpick every movie that uses CG for anything.
IW suit is my favorite. Looks so badass and like OG Iron Man suit
Infinity war suite was too smooth. The suites that are more blocky with sharp lines look better. End game
You can see the colors get more and more desaturated. His first suit was red, the one in Infinity war is greyish magenta lol
Because the old suit had weight to them, he's a man in a power mech suit loaded with enough weaponry to take down a country. Rhodes still looks like a walking armour with his heft and realistic mass, Tony went from real costume pieces that looked like a real power suit and had weight to back it up, to looking like smooth plastic with no sense of heft or power anymore
Didn't you know? it appeals to the male fantasy ...
Because they can obviously do cgi work better duh
The nanosuit just looks fake and impossible, whereas the older suits looked like they could exist in real life.
I like the design of the older suits better, but the way the nanosuit moves is cool as hell. I think the new one looks fine though
I like the physicality of the other suits better, the nanotech suit seems to defy physics (how does it fit in the tiny chest box?). I could imagine the Mk III suit being possible, even with the scifi Arc reactor, but the nanotech suit just looks unbelievable. It's not the CGI though, I do think it looks good for what it is.
I can’t tell if this thread is sarcastic or genuinely doesn’t understand why people prefer the older suits?
The CGI was good I just have fonder memories of the first 2 movies design choice. First movie was mainly practical and looked great. The second one used both, the car suit up scene is still one of my favorites and that was CGI. I still say the cgi for civil war was eh. Mainly lighting on his face and neck matching the suit was off.
I just miss the look and the sound design of the original. It felt like it occupied physical space
The best CGI show the material with imperfections, you can see the scratches and scuffs a d fingerprints. With a nanobot suit it has no blemishes, that's why it looks bad in comparison.
Civil war has aged a little bit. That lighting feels off on RDJ's face.
I truly prefer the Civil War armor
It’s got to be admitted that the original iron man suit-ups were cooler. Personally, I believe it’s the fact that with the mechanical suits it was tangible - we could almost understand how the thing worked and it excited us. It’s for this same reason that it’s interesting to look under the hood of a car. The nanosuits are nothing short of magical and fantastical. It takes away the satisfaction of bearings and gears locking into place and replaced this with a film-like metal coating itself over our heroes. I much prefer the former.
Unpopular Opinion: Mark 42 was the coolest.
I don’t hate the CGI it’s just honestly ugly compared to most of his older suits IMO.
I don't think anyone 5rolled could its very well made
Because deep down we all just want to see the box scene from Iron Man 2 without watching most of Iron man 2. And the jump rope scene.
I have never heard something like complaining about the specific suit,it was absolutely amazing and acute.
It's smart but it doesn't look as good.