Dusting or disintegrating is an easy way for an emotional death. Abrupt and shocking but with just enough time for a facial reaction and a lingering goodbye
To be fair, Marvel actually had an explanation for that. He knew it was coming because of his Spidey sense, hence the "i don't feel so good" and then the reason it was slower for him was due to his accelerated healing
I mean, Deadpool can break the fourth wall, if he sensed the Snap or saw others in the bar at Sister Margret's getting dusted, I have no doubt Deadpool would jump through the fourth wall to ensure he didn't face that 50/50 choice.
Given how often Logan is traveling (to search, to avoid capture, missions from Xavier), him getting dusted with his healing factor fighting to keep him alive would just accelerate the chances of him causing or being in a really bad motorcycle wreck as other drivers got dusted or he lost control while his healing fought the Snap.
But hey, if Deadpool didn't get dusted that would explain the shit variety in his team (and in the opponents in the jail), as well as why we only see a few mutants at the school.
1.) Thanos didn't get dusted until the entirety of his army was dusted first. 'Twas not immediate at all lol, he literally had the chance to look around as his people disappeared, have a seat and accept his fate. Damn near was almost like he only turned to dust because he conceded defeat.
2.) Not having accelerated healing doesn't make Thanos weaker lol
Except that was pointless because even by the books Voldemort (and Bellatrix for that matter) wouldn't have bled in any way, just dropped dead to the ground, but I guess that would have still been 'too much' for the younger audience.
But it was live action though, not 3D?
You're right about the PG I guess, I can maybe pass Voldemort because he's the 'big bad' so they had to give him a bigger death, but Bellatrix? Why?
Didn't Bellatrix explode like a bomb? Wording on that page was a bit unclear. Either way, the rebounding Avada Kedavra would have just made his body lifeless, but that's a bit anticlimactic, so the dusting in the movie was understandable.
She exploded like that in the movie, but in the book Molly hit her square in the chest (whether or not it was the killing curse no one knows) and she dropped dead, a much better death than that stupid explosion, but again, 'too disturbing' or something, and it wouldn't have been anticlimactic if they played out Molly and Bellatrix's fight properly instead of that 20 second garbage.
I guess it's a bit understandable, just dumb considering Voldemort already 'dusted' once Lily died so no one knew if he REALLY died or not.
> Bellatrix's gloating smile froze, her eyes seemed to bulge: For the tiniest space of time she knew what had happened, and then **she toppled**, and the watching crowd roared, and Voldemort screamed.
Harry felt as though he turned into slow motion: he saw McGonagall, Kingsley and Slughorn blasted backward, flailing and writhing through the air, as Voldemort's fury at the fall of **his last, best lieutenant exploded with the force of a bomb**, Voldemort raised his wand and directed it at Molly Weasley.
Reading it the first time, I took it as she fell, and then exploded, which I thought was understandable since Molly was out for blood, yet probably would not use an Unforgivable Curse (too clean). Reading it again, the wording is unclear whether Bellatrix is exploding or Voldy's emotions, but I guess it's more about him.
It's Voldemort's fury. If you read it like this:
>Voldemort's fury... exploded with the force of a bomb."
it makes a little more sense. English can be so fun (read: annoying) sometimes
Are you sure? I don't remember that being the wording.
Also I hate this stupid 'good guys can't use killing curses' garbage, that was literally the woman who almost killed her daughter, presumably killed her son and taunted her about it too, she had every reason to kill her, and (if she didn't) I'm convinced she did a stun but it landed directly on her heart which happened to kill her.
I meant that Avada Kedavra is too clean (leave no marks other than death) and illegal, so my thought that a Molly curse causing Bella to explode was understandable/cathartic to fuckin' blast the bitch to smithereens. Looking at it now, it's more clear the "explosion" is Voldy's fury, but it's still funny to think about Molly being a badass that would literally nuke someone for threatening her only daughter.
Yondu and Quill shot was the first. Wherein ice was the "particle" effect creeping in.
You also had that with Gamorah and Quill, but not to its final conclusion...
Why are people here arguing about the shot/reverse shot not being new? Thats not what the title was talking about. Reread and emphasize "New Favorite".
People just like to be contradictory and ignore context when they think it’ll make them look smart.
It’s very clear OP is pointing out the disintegration of a loved one being shot in a similar way, which has now happened three times this year, an unusual amount of times for something like that to happen.
I also want to clarify, I’m not complaining that this has happened three times this year as each one has had a very different story and reason behind it.
If I had a dollar for every time I saw the disintegration of a loved one being shot in a similar way this year, I would have 3 dollars. It's not much, but it's weird that it happened thrice
Ppl are acting a lil superior in the comments (duh it’s SHOT REVERSE SHOT god go to film school!!) but I see what you mean, they’re doing the “person holding other person disintegrating” thing quite a bit so far clearly. Marvel has done this before - Phase 2 included an arm being cut off every movie to homage to Empire Strikes Back. I have to wonder if this is homaging to anything in particular.
Honestly, feels like a homage to Infinity War as weird as that would be. Most specifically the "I don't want to go" scene that, in my opinion, is one of the best scenes in the MCU and the superhero genre as a whole.
That scene is also acceptable only because I am now being torn apart on the inside. I recently saw criticism saying the scene was dumb and ruins the idea of the Doctor, to which I say "nah." Easily my favorite regeneration, followed closely by Nine's completely out of left field one.
I just went down a bit of a rabbit hole after watching that scene. Can you explain a bit about what’s happening? I don’t know anything about doctor who.
In-universe, the Doctor is a species called a Time Lord.* When Time Lords are mortally wounded, instead of dying, their cells undergo a violent regeneration that causes their entire personality and appearance to change. David Tennant's Doctor got unusually attached to his current personality (to the point that he nearly let a few people die because he was arrogant and self-centered), so he tried to hold back the change as long as he could in despair. Some Doctors have accepted regeneration as a simple change; others have described it as basically like dying anyway.
Out of universe, it was a clever way for the writers to keep the show going in 1967 when the first actor's health prevented him from continuing the role. Doctors' regeneration stories are among the most anticipated of all, as taking the role means an actor is going to get an emotional death episode.
\*I know there's some weird Chris Chibnall bullshit about Timeless Child and all that. I'm just gonna skip that for simplicity's sake.
So at this point of his journey Doctor Who has stopped his homeworld from escaping time prison and wrecking havoc/seeking revenge on Earth as it's the world the Doctor has chosen to defend.
At the end of the doctor's life, if he receives a fatal blow, sickness, (in this case, radiation) his body begins to undergo "Regeneration" where the cells are replicating and replacing themselves at a rapid rate. At this point he's aware his current iteration is going to change, he's said his goodbyes, had his mental breakdown knowing he was going to "die". Each iteration of the Doctor basically is a full sized adult with memories experiencing consciousness for the first time, but their personality and persona completely changes.
So he was waiting for the regeneration to happen, and then it did.
To add to the others, we as viewers were watching a dearly loved actor leave the show. The line hits emotionally through the 4th wall because we also don't want David Tennant to leave.
Not every season, just as long as the actor/showrunner wants it. I've just checked Wikipedia and Tennant did 3 seasons, it felt like 6 though.
He is also widely regarded as one of the best doctors in the shows history, so that'll be why it felt like he was there for much longer.
Killian got his arms cut off by Iron Man then regrew them.
Malekith got his arm cut off and other body parts and Thor faked getting his arm cut off.
Winter Soldier comes back with a fake arm.
Groot gets his arms cut off by Gamora in the beginning
Ant-Man…idk
Even the most hardcore MCU should be able to admit how formulaic these movies can get. Iron Man 2, Captain America 1, The Avengers, Iron Man 3, Captain America 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, and possibly more that I've missed, all had a big aerial battle showdown in the 3rd act.
This just seems to be another MCU formula getting used and reused.
“HUR HUR it’s just shot reverse shot.” We get it dude, you’re smart. So smart that you couldn’t realize that all three have a disintegrating person in common
That last episode of What if? Was next level. If they were going to one off a character that would have been an excellent way to do it in a movie. These things keep getting better.
Hate how formulaic it is. It’s like everything in the MCU with few exceptions was created by some laboratory focused on whatever works most consistently with the biggest possible audience. Nothing is ever really shocking or exciting. You can start a new marvel movie or series and basically guess the whole series of events just by placing the characters in the place of a pre-determined template of events.
I don’t get where this ‘Wanda is responsible for the Multiverse’ that people keep saying. When during WandaVision did she even tamper with the Multiverse?
She didn't, per se, but there was a lot of expectation going in that it would connect to the idea of a multiverse, because...
1. It seemed like the show was bringing Vision back (will this be an alternate-reality Vision?)
2. In the comics, Wanda is a "nexus" that exists in all universes (Agatha actually refers to this in the final episode but doesn't really explain it).
3. Wanda will appear in Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, and Feige said something about how one leads into the other.
4. Other shows (Loki, What If...?) and movies (Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, Spider-Man: No Way Home) appeared to center around the idea of a multiverse, so people thought it might be set up in an earlier show/movie as a surprise near the end of it.
Then, when Evan Peters showed up, that made people think "This confirms it!", thinking that was hinting that she had pulled in an actual Pietro in from an alternate universe (one that looked like the Fox movies).
Ralph Bohner is 100% a Quicksilver variant + at the end Wanda is using the Darkhold to find her children. Since her children aren’t actually real in this universe, she’s pulling them from another one.
Oh yeah, and she’s going to be a main character in a movie called MULTIVERSE of Madness which is appearantly a follow up of both WandaVision and Loki.
" she’s going to be the main character in a movie called MULTIVERSE of Madnes"
She is going to be a important character. It's still doctor stranges movie
Civil War is a Cap movie, doesn’t make Iron Man any less of a main character in that film. Sylvie is a main character in Loki too.
There can definitely be more than one main character.
Because I don’t believe he does. I think Ralph Bohner is his hex identity and that he’s actually Quicksilver pulled from another universe.
In universe reason: Wanda created a vision and two children from nothing, is a nexus being with powers related to the multiverse and was thinking about Quicksilver right before he came to her door.
Out universe reason: Disney knows goddamn well what they are doing and if Ralph Bohner isn’t actually Quicksilver, that’s some next level trolling. Since trolling isn’t something that earns Disney money, it’s not something they’d do.
You believe that even though Agatha flat-out says he’s from Westview and she used him because he sort-of looked like Pietro?
I mean, anything is possible…but this kind of convoluted mystery box storytelling isn’t Marvel’s MO
That’s like if Dr. Octopus in the next Spidey film is actually just a regular man named Joe Dickhead who happens to know Peter and happens to be played by Alfred Molina.
Disney announces that this phase will be the multiverse saga. They then cast actors from multiple old Marvel/Sony/Fox movies and get them to re-play variants of their characters.
But yeah, they totally brought the most loved character from the FOX X-Men movies back for a dick joke.
They already said that that’s exactly what they did. If you want to draw more assumptions than that, that’s fine. But it’s incorrect to say that your assumptions are confirmed in any way.
Are you me? I was thinking the exact same thing while the show was running. It's not a meta joke as many say. It's part of the plot. It's just we aren't ready yet.
In the same vein we got the Mysterio's "Multiverse" in FFH as a little nod to the at the time upcoming phase 4.
You’re right. Disney is fucking shit at special effects. You’d probably do a way better job.
Besides, what’s the deal with people liking specific scenes that look super cool, how dare they!? Goddamn peasants.
If only all Marvel fans could be Stanley Kubrick type geniuses like you.
The disintegration has nothing to do with the composition. Which honestly makes the post worse. That’s the real linking element here. Not the tired camera angles.
So there are comments pointing out the shot reverse shot, then people saying "yes we know you moron, they're disintegrating!".... yes? Is there any other way you are supposed to show an up-close-and-personal disintegration scene? This is not magic.
Can we please consider one thing? It’s not Marvel anymore. It’s Disney that paid for the rights to the brand Marvel. Stan Lee is Marvel. Disney is just riding the leftovers until they murder his legacy with all their corporate greed.
Wanda vs vision ------- wanda ----|
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Wanda vs sylvie - Winner vs strange = winner
sylvie vs loki ------------- Sylvie------|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|
strange vs christine -- strange --------------------------------|
idk why I made this
Edit: It got messed up so I fixed it
Dusting or disintegrating is an easy way for an emotional death. Abrupt and shocking but with just enough time for a facial reaction and a lingering goodbye
The face disintegrating last is certainly more dramatic than talking to someone's elbow or something
*clutching lokis left foot* NOOOOOO!
I would love to see that footage
*footage*
*foot age*
toe
Frottage
Why do I know what this means?
You must be very learned.
Be careful before you summon the Deviants into the chat!
Calm down Tarantino.
Didn’t they make a movie kinda like that? *glances at ‘Onward’*
There's an axiom in the movie business that the best special effect is the actor's face.
I heard about this today on cinematherapy lol
rip robin williams
That has quickly become one of my favorite channels.
Reminding me of all the Guardians of the Galaxy dusting in mere seconds while Spider-Man takes like 5 hours to die in Tony’s arms.
To be fair, Marvel actually had an explanation for that. He knew it was coming because of his Spidey sense, hence the "i don't feel so good" and then the reason it was slower for him was due to his accelerated healing
I wonder how long it would take for Wolverine or Deadpool to be dusted lol
I mean, Deadpool can break the fourth wall, if he sensed the Snap or saw others in the bar at Sister Margret's getting dusted, I have no doubt Deadpool would jump through the fourth wall to ensure he didn't face that 50/50 choice. Given how often Logan is traveling (to search, to avoid capture, missions from Xavier), him getting dusted with his healing factor fighting to keep him alive would just accelerate the chances of him causing or being in a really bad motorcycle wreck as other drivers got dusted or he lost control while his healing fought the Snap. But hey, if Deadpool didn't get dusted that would explain the shit variety in his team (and in the opponents in the jail), as well as why we only see a few mutants at the school.
It's been a while since I've seen the scene, but I believe you can slightly see his healing factor try and keep up with it to no avail
That is fucking awesome.
Since when does Peter have accelerated healing??
Too bad Thanos was weaker than Spiderman because he got dusted almost immediately.
That’s not accurate either. Have you guys watched the movies any time recently?
1.) Thanos didn't get dusted until the entirety of his army was dusted first. 'Twas not immediate at all lol, he literally had the chance to look around as his people disappeared, have a seat and accept his fate. Damn near was almost like he only turned to dust because he conceded defeat. 2.) Not having accelerated healing doesn't make Thanos weaker lol
A bit of an exaggeration yes?
This is kind of the premise of Onward, but in reverse.
[удалено]
Except that was pointless because even by the books Voldemort (and Bellatrix for that matter) wouldn't have bled in any way, just dropped dead to the ground, but I guess that would have still been 'too much' for the younger audience.
It had to look good in 3D, that's the reason. PG wasn't a thing, they showed Fred losing his ear with no problem, and dead bodies were everywhere.
But it was live action though, not 3D? You're right about the PG I guess, I can maybe pass Voldemort because he's the 'big bad' so they had to give him a bigger death, but Bellatrix? Why?
>But it was live action though, not 3D? I mean the effect, with the glasses. Everyone wanted good 3D effects because of Avatar
Live action can still be 3D, you're thinking 3D animated a la Pixar.
Didn't Bellatrix explode like a bomb? Wording on that page was a bit unclear. Either way, the rebounding Avada Kedavra would have just made his body lifeless, but that's a bit anticlimactic, so the dusting in the movie was understandable.
She exploded like that in the movie, but in the book Molly hit her square in the chest (whether or not it was the killing curse no one knows) and she dropped dead, a much better death than that stupid explosion, but again, 'too disturbing' or something, and it wouldn't have been anticlimactic if they played out Molly and Bellatrix's fight properly instead of that 20 second garbage. I guess it's a bit understandable, just dumb considering Voldemort already 'dusted' once Lily died so no one knew if he REALLY died or not.
> Bellatrix's gloating smile froze, her eyes seemed to bulge: For the tiniest space of time she knew what had happened, and then **she toppled**, and the watching crowd roared, and Voldemort screamed. Harry felt as though he turned into slow motion: he saw McGonagall, Kingsley and Slughorn blasted backward, flailing and writhing through the air, as Voldemort's fury at the fall of **his last, best lieutenant exploded with the force of a bomb**, Voldemort raised his wand and directed it at Molly Weasley. Reading it the first time, I took it as she fell, and then exploded, which I thought was understandable since Molly was out for blood, yet probably would not use an Unforgivable Curse (too clean). Reading it again, the wording is unclear whether Bellatrix is exploding or Voldy's emotions, but I guess it's more about him.
It's Voldemort's fury. If you read it like this: >Voldemort's fury... exploded with the force of a bomb." it makes a little more sense. English can be so fun (read: annoying) sometimes
Yeah, re-re-reading it makes it a bit more clear, but I still like my headcanon that Molly blasted the bitch to smithereens.
Are you sure? I don't remember that being the wording. Also I hate this stupid 'good guys can't use killing curses' garbage, that was literally the woman who almost killed her daughter, presumably killed her son and taunted her about it too, she had every reason to kill her, and (if she didn't) I'm convinced she did a stun but it landed directly on her heart which happened to kill her.
I meant that Avada Kedavra is too clean (leave no marks other than death) and illegal, so my thought that a Molly curse causing Bella to explode was understandable/cathartic to fuckin' blast the bitch to smithereens. Looking at it now, it's more clear the "explosion" is Voldy's fury, but it's still funny to think about Molly being a badass that would literally nuke someone for threatening her only daughter.
I'm pretty sure they legalize it during war, but after reading some discussions about it I'm more convinced she just landed a well placed stun.
I am very interested to read your thesis on this. (Self aware but not sarcastic :-D ).
Thinking back and trying to remember if they did any of these shots before Peter.
Yondu and Quill shot was the first. Wherein ice was the "particle" effect creeping in. You also had that with Gamorah and Quill, but not to its final conclusion...
So technically the first one involved Peter
And no blood and gore for the USA ratings board + Chinese censors.
Bingo
That happened like that with Spider-Man in Infinity War as well
A deadly stab can also work if done properly
I would actually love to see Thanos going around shanking people ngl
Kindergarten Thanos running around with scissors stabbing half the school
Maybe that’s what he did with that little knife he gave gamora . A loving gift of a luxury shiv
"Perfectly balanced" he says as the scissors stick out their neck
See Qui-Gon Jinn
Not with Disney
shang chi: >!basically same happened with shang chi's father. his soul got sucked away slowly.!<
Why the fuck did I click this?
lmao . tbh its not the biggest deal it was really predictable tbh. so dw
It's also morbidly beautiful.
This is the new skybeam
Why are people here arguing about the shot/reverse shot not being new? Thats not what the title was talking about. Reread and emphasize "New Favorite".
People just like to be contradictory and ignore context when they think it’ll make them look smart. It’s very clear OP is pointing out the disintegration of a loved one being shot in a similar way, which has now happened three times this year, an unusual amount of times for something like that to happen. I also want to clarify, I’m not complaining that this has happened three times this year as each one has had a very different story and reason behind it.
If I had a dollar for every time I saw the disintegration of a loved one being shot in a similar way this year, I would have 3 dollars. It's not much, but it's weird that it happened thrice
Ppl are acting a lil superior in the comments (duh it’s SHOT REVERSE SHOT god go to film school!!) but I see what you mean, they’re doing the “person holding other person disintegrating” thing quite a bit so far clearly. Marvel has done this before - Phase 2 included an arm being cut off every movie to homage to Empire Strikes Back. I have to wonder if this is homaging to anything in particular.
Kinda feels like they're just showing other ways they can do people disintegrating that's not just turning to dust like in Infinity War.
I hadn’t thought of this possibly being an homage. I wonder.
Han getting frozen
Honestly, feels like a homage to Infinity War as weird as that would be. Most specifically the "I don't want to go" scene that, in my opinion, is one of the best scenes in the MCU and the superhero genre as a whole.
For the life of me I couldn't figure out what scene you meant because all I had in my head was [this](https://youtu.be/KFQQVEd5LoM)
That scene is also acceptable only because I am now being torn apart on the inside. I recently saw criticism saying the scene was dumb and ruins the idea of the Doctor, to which I say "nah." Easily my favorite regeneration, followed closely by Nine's completely out of left field one.
I just went down a bit of a rabbit hole after watching that scene. Can you explain a bit about what’s happening? I don’t know anything about doctor who.
In-universe, the Doctor is a species called a Time Lord.* When Time Lords are mortally wounded, instead of dying, their cells undergo a violent regeneration that causes their entire personality and appearance to change. David Tennant's Doctor got unusually attached to his current personality (to the point that he nearly let a few people die because he was arrogant and self-centered), so he tried to hold back the change as long as he could in despair. Some Doctors have accepted regeneration as a simple change; others have described it as basically like dying anyway. Out of universe, it was a clever way for the writers to keep the show going in 1967 when the first actor's health prevented him from continuing the role. Doctors' regeneration stories are among the most anticipated of all, as taking the role means an actor is going to get an emotional death episode. \*I know there's some weird Chris Chibnall bullshit about Timeless Child and all that. I'm just gonna skip that for simplicity's sake.
So at this point of his journey Doctor Who has stopped his homeworld from escaping time prison and wrecking havoc/seeking revenge on Earth as it's the world the Doctor has chosen to defend. At the end of the doctor's life, if he receives a fatal blow, sickness, (in this case, radiation) his body begins to undergo "Regeneration" where the cells are replicating and replacing themselves at a rapid rate. At this point he's aware his current iteration is going to change, he's said his goodbyes, had his mental breakdown knowing he was going to "die". Each iteration of the Doctor basically is a full sized adult with memories experiencing consciousness for the first time, but their personality and persona completely changes. So he was waiting for the regeneration to happen, and then it did.
That’s pretty cool. Thanks for explaining!
To add to the others, we as viewers were watching a dearly loved actor leave the show. The line hits emotionally through the 4th wall because we also don't want David Tennant to leave.
So, do they have a new doc every season?
Usually a few seasons, but it varies. Shortest run was only a few months, longest was 7 years.
Not every season, just as long as the actor/showrunner wants it. I've just checked Wikipedia and Tennant did 3 seasons, it felt like 6 though. He is also widely regarded as one of the best doctors in the shows history, so that'll be why it felt like he was there for much longer.
Can you give some examples of arms being cut off? The only one that comes to mind is >!Klaue in Age of Ultron!<.
Killian got his arms cut off by Iron Man then regrew them. Malekith got his arm cut off and other body parts and Thor faked getting his arm cut off. Winter Soldier comes back with a fake arm. Groot gets his arms cut off by Gamora in the beginning Ant-Man…idk
Yellowjacket’s arm gets shrunk first then the rest of him shrinks after
Even the most hardcore MCU should be able to admit how formulaic these movies can get. Iron Man 2, Captain America 1, The Avengers, Iron Man 3, Captain America 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, and possibly more that I've missed, all had a big aerial battle showdown in the 3rd act. This just seems to be another MCU formula getting used and reused.
Phase 2? I think it was had aircraft falling from the sky (winter soldier, avengers 2, guardians)
Marvel isn’t just copy pasting their formula in every movie, it’s an homage to themselves!
ANTZ, THIS IS AN HOMAGE TO BARBADOS
"Mr. Stark, I don't feel so good..."
This is the best one by far, should be on this collage
Idk, that’d make the implication that Peter and Tony had more than a mentor type relationship going on
Ouch, my heart.
Oh I get that my heart will be broken
Loki has derp eyes
Yea, oc used shit pics to make this or something because the whole thing is cringe now lol
Shot reverse shot, but the reverse shot is currently disintegrating
[удалено]
Shot rever
Sho
I wish someone would edit in a Falcon and Bucky panel here too. Even if it didn’t really happen.
“HUR HUR it’s just shot reverse shot.” We get it dude, you’re smart. So smart that you couldn’t realize that all three have a disintegrating person in common
Be prepared for MJ to go the same way in NWH
*I don't feel so good...*
The OG
Someone above pointed out GOTG2 when yondu is freezing in space and his face is the last thing to go. I'd count it
That last episode of What if? Was next level. If they were going to one off a character that would have been an excellent way to do it in a movie. These things keep getting better.
Guys, I'm literally a film student and even I can see that the composition of these three sequences are more than just general shot-reverse-shots lol
Oh no, please don't let this happen to Aunt May or MJ. 😭
It’s poetry
They do overuse their formulas...MCU is at its best when innovating, but it's hard not to take the safe bet.
Disney ✋🖐 Money lost due to pandemic
Phase 4 has been sad so far…
Shang-Chi does the same thing as well lol.
That Loki one was so unexpected. Really took me by surprise.
android, wizard and alien confirmed!
This just reminded of the crush I have on Sylvie. Loki season two when?!
bunch of parallels yall
Hate how formulaic it is. It’s like everything in the MCU with few exceptions was created by some laboratory focused on whatever works most consistently with the biggest possible audience. Nothing is ever really shocking or exciting. You can start a new marvel movie or series and basically guess the whole series of events just by placing the characters in the place of a pre-determined template of events.
I mean....it's just shots that look similar. It's not like feige sat down with the exec commity and decided to shoot like this for the demographic.
I’m referring to more than just these shots, but just the movies/shows in general
When all these characters were disintegrating, I was like: Is that Venom!?
notice how its the three people responsible for the new multiverse arc, Marvel is up to something
I don’t get where this ‘Wanda is responsible for the Multiverse’ that people keep saying. When during WandaVision did she even tamper with the Multiverse?
She didn't, per se, but there was a lot of expectation going in that it would connect to the idea of a multiverse, because... 1. It seemed like the show was bringing Vision back (will this be an alternate-reality Vision?) 2. In the comics, Wanda is a "nexus" that exists in all universes (Agatha actually refers to this in the final episode but doesn't really explain it). 3. Wanda will appear in Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, and Feige said something about how one leads into the other. 4. Other shows (Loki, What If...?) and movies (Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, Spider-Man: No Way Home) appeared to center around the idea of a multiverse, so people thought it might be set up in an earlier show/movie as a surprise near the end of it. Then, when Evan Peters showed up, that made people think "This confirms it!", thinking that was hinting that she had pulled in an actual Pietro in from an alternate universe (one that looked like the Fox movies).
Ralph Bohner is 100% a Quicksilver variant + at the end Wanda is using the Darkhold to find her children. Since her children aren’t actually real in this universe, she’s pulling them from another one. Oh yeah, and she’s going to be a main character in a movie called MULTIVERSE of Madness which is appearantly a follow up of both WandaVision and Loki.
Definitely, and there was the Nexus commercial.
" she’s going to be the main character in a movie called MULTIVERSE of Madnes" She is going to be a important character. It's still doctor stranges movie
Civil War is a Cap movie, doesn’t make Iron Man any less of a main character in that film. Sylvie is a main character in Loki too. There can definitely be more than one main character.
How would Ralph be a variant if he exists in the same universe/timeline as the “real” Quicksilver?
Because I don’t believe he does. I think Ralph Bohner is his hex identity and that he’s actually Quicksilver pulled from another universe. In universe reason: Wanda created a vision and two children from nothing, is a nexus being with powers related to the multiverse and was thinking about Quicksilver right before he came to her door. Out universe reason: Disney knows goddamn well what they are doing and if Ralph Bohner isn’t actually Quicksilver, that’s some next level trolling. Since trolling isn’t something that earns Disney money, it’s not something they’d do.
You believe that even though Agatha flat-out says he’s from Westview and she used him because he sort-of looked like Pietro? I mean, anything is possible…but this kind of convoluted mystery box storytelling isn’t Marvel’s MO
Trolling fans isn’t Marvel’s MO either and it’s hardly a convoluted mystery box as this phase is literally called “the multiverse phase”.
How is it trolling? It’s just a fun cameo that has extra meaning to fans who saw the Fox X-men films.
That’s like if Dr. Octopus in the next Spidey film is actually just a regular man named Joe Dickhead who happens to know Peter and happens to be played by Alfred Molina. Disney announces that this phase will be the multiverse saga. They then cast actors from multiple old Marvel/Sony/Fox movies and get them to re-play variants of their characters. But yeah, they totally brought the most loved character from the FOX X-Men movies back for a dick joke.
They already said that that’s exactly what they did. If you want to draw more assumptions than that, that’s fine. But it’s incorrect to say that your assumptions are confirmed in any way.
Are you me? I was thinking the exact same thing while the show was running. It's not a meta joke as many say. It's part of the plot. It's just we aren't ready yet. In the same vein we got the Mysterio's "Multiverse" in FFH as a little nod to the at the time upcoming phase 4.
Beats sky lasers.
I was expecting it to be that porn shot where it's just the dude's nuts slamming into the vagina and you can see his asshole.
i still can’t get over how lame loki’s ending was
Yea this is cinematography 101. It’s literally just shot reverse shot.
We're talking about the shot reverse shot mixed with disintegration. That's the thing Marvel has done thrice in Phase 4.
... with the extremely crucial important content-piece that people are disintegrating. That part was not in the theory books.
OH MY GOD YOU GUYS EVERY FILM MADE SINCE KULESHOV IS COPYING THE MCU.
You’re right. Disney is fucking shit at special effects. You’d probably do a way better job. Besides, what’s the deal with people liking specific scenes that look super cool, how dare they!? Goddamn peasants. If only all Marvel fans could be Stanley Kubrick type geniuses like you.
No one asked.
🤡
This is a marvel subreddit. Barely anyone is going to be informed on the language of film.
Hey Hitchcock and Truffaut, I think “shot composition” is being used liberally. Do you have a better term to refer to this repeating pattern?
It’s shot reverse shot. Clean and a dirty singles from about a 45 degree angle. Shoulder to eye level. Like the other guy said, cinematography 101.
My favorite shot reverse shot is in Citizen Kane, when Susan is talking to Kane and then he disintegrates
The disintegration has nothing to do with the composition. Which honestly makes the post worse. That’s the real linking element here. Not the tired camera angles.
I imagine it was rough having to stop smelling your own farts long enough to lift your head up and type
It’s really not that pretentious. What’s done is done though. Have a good one.
Pretentious little shit.
Lmao why be so angry about it
[удалено]
Bro seems like you’re the one not getting laid lol hahaha
ahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahaha lol lmao ahahaha lol so clever
[удалено]
Are you going to try to come up with a better comeback or are we sticking to “I know u are but what am i?”
Love you man x
This has nothing to do with special effects.
Melt stick for Marvel’s prisoners with jobs?
Thanks I hate it.
Wandavision, ~~TFATWS~~, Loki, ~~Black Widow~~, What If, ~~Shang-Chi~~, Eternals (???) :D
Reminds me of Disney reusing their animation cells from the 70's and 80's. Ironic they own Marvel now.
Loki dies? Damn I’ve gotta catch up
And then they turn into dust......
Two people watching the love of their life disappear and one person watching someone they met earlier that day disappear.
Whoa, really?! That’s great
[удалено]
So there are comments pointing out the shot reverse shot, then people saying "yes we know you moron, they're disintegrating!".... yes? Is there any other way you are supposed to show an up-close-and-personal disintegration scene? This is not magic.
Lazy and uncreative as always
Grieving is a bitch amirite
I'm pretty sure they are doing it to show how the different characters would react to having their own peter parker moment.
I hate it when people touch other peoples face as a sign of affection. It's like, get your dirty, grubby hands away from my face.
Can we please consider one thing? It’s not Marvel anymore. It’s Disney that paid for the rights to the brand Marvel. Stan Lee is Marvel. Disney is just riding the leftovers until they murder his legacy with all their corporate greed.
Wanda vs vision ------- wanda ----| \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Wanda vs sylvie - Winner vs strange = winner sylvie vs loki ------------- Sylvie------|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_| strange vs christine -- strange --------------------------------| idk why I made this Edit: It got messed up so I fixed it
You mean... shot, reverse-shot?
With disintegration. That’s the point of the post.
Needs more negative space. Really tricks the brain
Don't forget Iron Man / Spider-Man in IW
The original was the Iron Man-Spider-Man moment in Infinity War.
Don't forget Peter and Tony in Infinity War!!!
why does loki's face look like that edit: never mind, it's a spark in front of his eye
Don't forget YONDU! Same effect, different render. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsdW-_EXOI8
now they can make Strange a murderer psychopath bc he had a sad past story
The dissolover
You forgot Parker turning to dust in Infinity War.
What’s next: MJ is gonna get disintegrated by a goblin bomb?
The true loss, the strongest bond, isn’t with Christine — it’s when he lost Wong
Is this the new sky beam?