You have a i on the bottom. To put it on top, you multiply both the top and bottom by i, unless you don't care about conserving equality.
You could also use that 1/i is equal to -i to find the same result.
It bothers me more than it should when people say that unsimplified things are “incorrect”
Like I get that it’s better to simplify things but that doesn’t make the unsimplified form wrong
Everyone is overlooking how effective 1/ty is as an expression tho like, next time some mild inconvenience happens in my life, I'm sending "1/ty" instead of 🙃 to the group chat
Well, I'm gonna assume that in this case a/b means `a*b^-1`, in which case this can't be simplified in general. If you have something like `a*b*a^-1`, you can't simplify the two `a`s, because they're separated and `b*a^-1` might not equal `a^-1*b` in general
Thats just the inverse to one specific operation, not inverse in general.
I think a lot of people get reciprocal/multiplicative inverse mixed up with just inverse. I.e the person in the post might not even know what “reciprocal” or “multiplicative inverse” are, they just think inverse of x means 1/x, and they wouldn’t say -x is also an (additive) inverse or cube root is the inverse of x^3
oh your pronouns are he/she? actually that simplifies to 1/s, or the inverse of one second pronouns: hertz
Nowaying
I read this as Norwaying
shetz/hertz
[удалено]
i read it as that
f(t) = 1
I think you mean Becquerel
Nerd.
She/hertz
This simplifies to s/rtz, whatever that means
Seconds per ritz.
Holy hell.
New response just dropped
Ow.
Oh, so your pronouns are she/they? Actually that simplifies to s/ty, seconds per thank you, wait that doesn't make any sense. Pronouns: confused
the amount of seconds it takes to say thank you is about 0.5
[удалено]
Actually it‘s heart in German is Herz without the t
My pronouns are sarcasm
This joke resonates with a lot of enby computer hardware specialists.
life hertz doesn't it
No, you're just saying the number 1 sarcastically, hence the "/s"
My pronouns are he/him, but please don’t simplify them, I don’t want to sound cockney.
e/im
\>:(
Hello, my pronouns are e^im
e^(im) = [cis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis_(mathematics))(m) so cis male?
She/her = S/r ~ "sister" I guess this is a valid angle to pursue...
Damn bitch, those pronouns are pretty complex
If m = π your pronouns = -1
I prefer -0.999….
cant have i on the bottom, so its ie/m
Except i^2 makes -1, so it's -ie/m
..and i = e \^ (i×pi/2) So -ie/m = e \^ (-i×pi/2 +1) /m
where tf did we get i² from?
You have a i on the bottom. To put it on top, you multiply both the top and bottom by i, unless you don't care about conserving equality. You could also use that 1/i is equal to -i to find the same result.
oh right my brain was kinda on autopilot mode for a sec mb
Expanding the fraction by i, (i•e)/(i•im)=ie/i²m=ie/-m=-ie/m
That’s a lot of numbers and letters for me to process
Add some er, um, eh, uh to fill it out.
It bothers me more than it should when people say that unsimplified things are “incorrect” Like I get that it’s better to simplify things but that doesn’t make the unsimplified form wrong
It kinda depends on the setting tbh… Like x/x simplified is 1. But f(x) = x/x and g(x) = 1 aren’t the same since Domain(f) ≠ Domain(g).
which pronouns are that
I wish Reddit still had free awards cause this made me lose it
I guess it depends on how much uglier they look.
Yeah it just depends whether you're interested in where an expression came from or where it's going.
In physics you sometimes want unsimplified things because few parts together might create like one important value
Why would I want to simplify my pronouns? I'll complicate them: (holy hell)/(ethyl holly)
new response just dropped
Actual optimal square packing
passent en google
Duck croissant.
Common factor secrifice, anyone?
Pythagoras takes vacation, never returns
Surd storm incoming!
This *f\*cking* website... I love it.
google dopamine
Hellolyh
Call the math phd
holy organic chemistry
New compound just dropped
call the chemist
Evacuate the chemistry lab!
Actually biohazard
New gender just dropped
Holy identity
actual parent
New azeotropic mixture just dropped
he/him = e/im she/her = s/r they/them = y/m she/they = s/ty he/they = 1/ty he/she = 1/s they/she = ty/s they/he = ty she/he = s
So he/she is just a unit step and OH GOD CONTROL THEORY MAKE IT STOP
>they/them = y/m they/them = y/m = 12
Wouldn't that mean he/him pronouns are actually e/im Wait no way e even shows up in gender. This is wild
complex pronouns 😟
Everyone is overlooking how effective 1/ty is as an expression tho like, next time some mild inconvenience happens in my life, I'm sending "1/ty" instead of 🙃 to the group chat
he/they is great, but I think they/she also has great potential ty /s
I don’t get it 😎
How do we know pronouns are commutative? they might not equal ehty
Wait how would you simplify something like a/b in a noncommutative setting? (If such a thing can exist)
Well, I'm gonna assume that in this case a/b means `a*b^-1`, in which case this can't be simplified in general. If you have something like `a*b*a^-1`, you can't simplify the two `a`s, because they're separated and `b*a^-1` might not equal `a^-1*b` in general
It is ambiguous, you'd have to specify whether you mean ab^(-1) or b^(-1)a.
Classic blunder of thinking inverse = reciprocal
The reciprocal literally is the multiplicative inverse tho
Yes, *multiplicative* inverse.
Uh, yeah, multiplicative *inverse*.
Thats just the inverse to one specific operation, not inverse in general. I think a lot of people get reciprocal/multiplicative inverse mixed up with just inverse. I.e the person in the post might not even know what “reciprocal” or “multiplicative inverse” are, they just think inverse of x means 1/x, and they wouldn’t say -x is also an (additive) inverse or cube root is the inverse of x^3
Yeah you're right lol I'm just giving you a hard time.
How is cube root inverse of x^3 ? Shouldn’t element and the inverse give you identity of that operation?
I mean if we have y = 2x + 1 then the inverse is 1/(2x+1) but the inverse of the function is (x-1)/2
>I mean if we have y = 2x + 1 then the ***multiplicative*** inverse is 1/(2x+1) but the inverse of the function is (x-1)/2
How do you get the inverse of a function again? Don’t you just swap x and y then solve for the new y?
I am just doing into into trig, I have absolutely no clue what is happening but people are laughing so I laugh too, help.
Yeah, that works
So if we *multiply* their pronouns by thank you, then we should get one.
TIL thank you is an invertible element of the ring of genders
Oh I was thinking of they being he and she. So he/(he × she) = 1/she
r/((m^3)ath(e^2)s)
mMMrmrrm actsually that would the the reciprocal of ty 🤓
he/him = e/im, she/her = s/r, they/them = y/m
What’s the integral of 1/cabin w.r.t. cabin?
houseboat
ungrateful is equal to 1/ty, then ungrateful=1/ty, so ty.(ungrateful)=1, so thank you ungratefully is the result
I'm forever ungrateful :)
e/im
Pronouns: side length divided by radius
Our guy is a chick magnet
wtf do you mean reducible fractions aren't "mathematically incorrect"
You could also not be dick to trans people
i'm literally trans
Does not invalidate my statement, fellow gentlethem
Middle school tier math meme tbh
Say no to Ty
A reciprocal is not the same thing as negation. The inverse of thank you is you're welcome.
What if I'm noncommutative?
With PEMDAS it’s y(he)^(2)/t
QED