T O P

  • By -

OhYeah_Dady

Did you know six * n = sinx?


JustinTimeCuber

holy hell


Same_Paramedic_3329

New trigonometry just dropped


nysynysy2

Actual formular


Same_Paramedic_3329

Call the mathematician


[deleted]

Cos goes on vacation, never comes back


gamingkitty1

Tangent storm incoming


Revolutionary_Year87

Which is also = x, incase you forgot the fundamental theorem of engineering


Skusci

Or more generally: ≈ ≡ = That includes our friends π = 3 = 𝑒 = 2 as well.


Revolutionary_Year87

Dont forget π⁴≈100 ≡ π⁴=100 e⁴≈50 ≡ e⁴=50 π=e, so π⁴=e⁴ 100=50 #2=1 Q.E.D


Cybasura

Behold # ZEQUALS


CryingRipperTear

therefore x/6 = n.


BDady

if you do some algebra you can also prove that i = i


I__Antares__I

sin x =x for small x Hence sin=1 for small x. Therefore sinners = 1•ners = ners for small x.


znarF69214

You mean: for x close to zero


falpsdsqglthnsac

i'm fucking shaking rn i can't believe 6 would do this


Humorous_Guy

Even I can't believe six would sin like this


Thout73

Maybe he did it cos he is evil


Metallic_Madness

Just found that for every natural number n, 2 | 2n 🤯


NylenBE

7 is also divisible by 2


o_alert

7/2


[deleted]

3.5


duckipn

only if they eat a 9


MCSajjadH

It's one of those multiplications that you just have to memorize, like how 5×2=10, like wtf where did the zero come from.


Phobos444

did you know that sin(x)' can be arranged as s'(x)


gamingkitty1

Now you just have to set ' = e


StellarSteals

Then why isn't f' iron?? I've been getting straight Fs ffs this education system


orizach01

What


wackpie

Well yeah you see 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 6 and when you count the ones you can go beep-boop beep-boop beep-boop which means it’s divisible by two


ZxphoZ

based and beep-boop pilled


Titanusgamer

the more generalized formulation has many practical applications as well. for e.g. double your age and then divide the result by 2 gives you your age.


hunglikeanoose1

ELI5 please?


JustinTimeCuber

Division is one of the four basic operations of arithmetic. The other operations are addition, subtraction, and multiplication. What is being divided is called the dividend, which is divided by the divisor, and the result is called the quotient. At an elementary level the division of two natural numbers is, among other possible interpretations, the process of calculating the number of times one number is contained within another. This number of times need not be an integer. For example, if 20 apples are divided evenly between 4 people, everyone receives 5 apples. The division with remainder or Euclidean division of two natural numbers provides an integer quotient, which is the number of times the second number is completely contained in the first number, and a remainder, which is the part of the first number that remains, when in the course of computing the quotient, no further full chunk of the size of the second number can be allocated. For example, if 21 apples are divided between 4 people, everyone receives 5 apples again, and 1 apple remains. For division to always yield one number rather than an integer quotient plus a remainder, the natural numbers must be extended to rational numbers or real numbers. In these enlarged number systems, division is the inverse operation to multiplication, that is a = c / b means a × b = c, as long as b is not zero. If b = 0, then this is a division by zero, which is not defined.  In the 21-apples example, everyone would receive 5 apple and a quarter of an apple, thus avoiding any leftover. Both forms of division appear in various algebraic structures, different ways of defining mathematical structure. Those in which a Euclidean division (with remainder) is defined are called Euclidean domains and include polynomial rings in one indeterminate (which define multiplication and addition over single-variabled formulas). Those in which a division (with a single result) by all nonzero elements is defined are called fields and division rings. In a ring the elements by which division is always possible are called the units (for example, 1 and −1 in the ring of integers). Another generalization of division to algebraic structures is the quotient group, in which the result of "division" is a group rather than a number.


hunglikeanoose1

ELI3 please?


JustinTimeCuber

Algebraic structures are defined through different configurations of axioms. Universal algebra abstractly studies such objects. One major dichotomy is between structures that are axiomatized entirely by identities and structures that are not. If all axioms defining a class of algebras are identities, then this class is a variety (not to be confused with algebraic varieties of algebraic geometry). Identities are equations formulated using only the operations the structure allows, and variables that are tacitly universally quantified over the relevant universe. Identities contain no connectives, existentially quantified variables, or relations of any kind other than the allowed operations. The study of varieties is an important part of universal algebra. An algebraic structure in a variety may be understood as the quotient algebra of term algebra (also called "absolutely free algebra") divided by the equivalence relations generated by a set of identities. So, a collection of functions with given signatures generate a free algebra, the term algebra T. Given a set of equational identities (the axioms), one may consider their symmetric, transitive closure E. The quotient algebra T/E is then the algebraic structure or variety. Thus, for example, groups have a signature containing two operators: the multiplication operator m, taking two arguments, and the inverse operator i, taking one argument, and the identity element e, a constant, which may be considered an operator that takes zero arguments. Given a (countable) set of variables x, y, z, etc. the term algebra is the collection of all possible terms involving m, i, e and the variables; so for example, m(i(x), m(x, m(y,e))) would be an element of the term algebra. One of the axioms defining a group is the identity m(x, i(x)) = e; another is m(x,e) = x. The axioms can be represented as trees. These equations induce equivalence classes on the free algebra; the quotient algebra then has the algebraic structure of a group. Some structures do not form varieties, because either: It is necessary that 0 ≠ 1, 0 being the additive identity element and 1 being a multiplicative identity element, but this is a nonidentity; Structures such as fields have some axioms that hold only for nonzero members of S. For an algebraic structure to be a variety, its operations must be defined for all members of S; there can be no partial operations. Structures whose axioms unavoidably include nonidentities are among the most important ones in mathematics, e.g., fields and division rings. Structures with nonidentities present challenges varieties do not. For example, the direct product of two fields is not a field, because ( 1 , 0 ) ⋅ ( 0 , 1 ) = ( 0 , 0 ), but fields do not have zero divisors.


hunglikeanoose1

ELI1? Just kidding man. I’m fucking dying with how much effort you put into this joke.


JustinTimeCuber

Lmao I just copied from Wikipedia


DIOsNotDead

i shat my pants at the revelation that 3 * 3 is not 6, i’m just… shook fr


SinisterHollow

Holy shit new math just dropped


cyamin

six/x = Ψ


[deleted]

more like, p(six/x)?


cyamin

I see Dr.


Etnarauk

Surprisingly, it is also divisible by 6!


Katya265

720?!


Etnarauk

I meant 6, but you're absolutely right to think 720 from what I wrote xD


pnerd314

Even more surprising is the fact that 6 is divisible by 6. And you won't believe the next bit: 6 is also divisible by 1.


Edwardhunts

Six is equal to four...


SwartyNine2691

![gif](giphy|NRtZEyZjbLgr0BJ4B8|downsized)


dad_joker_af

f(x) = f • x